feat(gitea): add gitea-files skill

Covers get_file_contents, get_dir_contents, get_repository_tree,
create_or_update_file, delete_file — all verified working with the
current write:issue/write:repository token scope.
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-05 10:38:52 +00:00
parent 828e79535f
commit 0c7dd04a46
4 changed files with 177 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# gitea-files
Read and write individual files and directory/repository trees in a Gitea repository via the Gitea MCP server.
## What it does
This skill handles file-domain operations within the Gitea integration suite: reading a single file's contents, listing one directory level, walking a full repository tree (optionally recursive), creating or updating a file, and deleting a file. It owns the SHA-based optimistic-concurrency pattern that Gitea requires for file writes — the domain's sharpest gotcha — and defers branch creation, commit history, and pull request mechanics to `gitea-branches` and `gitea-prs`.
## Usage
```
/gitea-files
```
Describe the file task: read a file or directory, walk a tree, create/update a file, or delete a file. Provide `owner`/`repo`/branch (or ask the user if not given) — this skill does not resolve them from a git remote itself.
## Files
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
| `references/examples.md` | Canonical call sequences: branch + file + PR, recovering a missing SHA before an update, deleting a file |
| `references/sources.md` | Research sources backing the SHA/concurrency and direct-commit-vs-PR guidance |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
---
name: gitea-files
description: >
Use when reading or writing individual files or directory trees in a Gitea repository via the
Gitea MCP server: reading a file's contents, listing a directory, walking a full repository
tree, creating a new file, updating an existing file, or deleting a file. Triggers on "read this
file from the repo", "what's in this directory", "show me the repo tree", "create/update a file
in Gitea", "commit this file to the branch", "delete this file from the repo" — even when the
user doesn't say "Gitea" explicitly, as long as the target is a Gitea-hosted repository. Do not
use for local filesystem file operations (use Read/Write/Edit), for branch or commit history
(use gitea-branches), or for opening a pull request around a file change (use gitea-prs after
the file write completes here).
compatibility: Requires the Gitea MCP server configured with a token scoped to at least
write:repository. Tested with a token holding write:issue + write:repository; write:issue
is not actually required for any of this domain's five tools.
metadata:
category: gitea
source_keys:
- gitea-mcp-repo
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
- context7-websites-gitea
allowed-tools: mcp__gitea__get_file_contents mcp__gitea__get_dir_contents mcp__gitea__get_repository_tree mcp__gitea__create_or_update_file mcp__gitea__delete_file
---
## Gotchas
- **SHA is the concurrency token for every write — and it lives at the top level of `get_file_contents`'s response, not nested under `content`.** `create_or_update_file` without `sha` is always treated as a *create*: if the path already exists, Gitea returns HTTP 409. `delete_file` has no optional path at all — omitting `sha` returns HTTP 422. The safe sequence for any update or delete is always: call `get_file_contents` first, read the top-level `sha` field, then pass that exact value to the write call. Never guess or reuse a stale SHA — a mismatched SHA is rejected the same as a missing one.
- **`get_dir_contents` and `get_repository_tree` are not SHA sources for a specific file's write.** `get_dir_contents` entries carry no `sha` at all. `get_repository_tree` entries do carry a `sha` (a blob/tree hash), but fetching it means an extra round trip with no content — `get_file_contents` is the canonical path since it returns the decoded content and the write-ready `sha` in one call.
- **`owner` and `repo` are always caller-supplied inputs, never resolved here.** This skill doesn't infer them from a git remote. If invoked directly by a human, ask for them if not stated. If invoked by `gitea-workflow` or an orchestrating agent, expect them to already be resolved and passed in.
- **Direct commits to a branch are a first-class action, not a workaround.** Gitea's own web UI defaults to editing files directly against a branch — `create_or_update_file`/`delete_file` used that way is normal, not an API escape hatch to avoid. The SHA-currency requirement above is the actual risk to manage, not the act of committing directly.
- **`ref` (reads) vs. `branch_name` (writes) are different parameters for the same concept.** `get_file_contents`, `get_dir_contents`, and `get_repository_tree` (as `tree_sha`) all accept a branch name, tag, or commit SHA to select what to read. `create_or_update_file` and `delete_file` instead take `branch_name` — the branch the commit lands on. Don't conflate the two when chaining a read into a write.
- **Content is base64.** `create_or_update_file`'s `content` parameter is base64-encoded file content, not raw text — encode before calling. `get_file_contents`'s response content is likewise base64-encoded (decode after reading), unless `withLines: true` is passed for a numbered-line view.
## Reading
- **Single file:** `get_file_contents(owner, repo, ref, path)`. Pass `withLines: true` only when you need line numbers for referencing specific lines (e.g. quoting a snippet back to the user); omit it for a normal content fetch.
- **One directory level:** `get_dir_contents(owner, repo, ref, path)` — returns immediate entries only (name, path, type, size), no recursion, no SHA, no content.
- **Whole tree:** `get_repository_tree(owner, repo, tree_sha, recursive)` — `tree_sha` accepts a SHA, branch, or tag name despite the name. Set `recursive: true` to walk subdirectories in one call. Response includes `truncated: true` when a page doesn't hold every entry — page through with `page`/`per_page` (default `page: 1`, `per_page: 30`) until you get fewer results than `per_page`.
## Writing
- **Creating a new file:** call `create_or_update_file(owner, repo, path, content, message, branch_name)` with `sha` omitted entirely.
- **Updating an existing file:** call `get_file_contents(owner, repo, ref: branch_name, path)` first, take the top-level `sha`, then call `create_or_update_file(..., sha: <that value>)`.
- **Deleting a file:** call `get_file_contents` first the same way, then `delete_file(owner, repo, path, message, branch_name, sha: <that value>)` — `sha` is required, no create-style fallback exists.
- **Creating a new branch as part of the write:** pass `new_branch_name` on `create_or_update_file` to branch off before the commit lands, instead of calling a separate branch-creation step.
If the change needs review before merging, or targets a protected branch, hand off to `gitea-prs` after the write lands here to open the pull request — this skill's scope ends at the commit.
If you need the full multi-call sequence rather than the single-call summary above — e.g. branching off as part of a file push ahead of opening a PR, or recovering a SHA you didn't capture earlier — read `references/examples.md`.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
---
source_keys:
- gitea-mcp-repo
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
---
# Canonical call sequences
## Push a file to a new branch, then open a PR
```
1. get_repository_tree or get_file_contents on the base branch — only needed if the
new file is actually replacing an existing one; skip for a brand-new path.
2. create_or_update_file
owner, repo
path: "docs/example.md"
content: "<base64-encoded content>"
message: "docs: add example"
branch_name: "main"
new_branch_name: "feat/add-example" ← branches off before the commit lands
(sha omitted — this is a new file)
3. Hand off to gitea-prs to open a PR from "feat/add-example" into "main".
```
`new_branch_name` on `create_or_update_file` replaces a separate branch-creation call — the branch is created and the commit lands on it in one step.
## Update a file when you don't already have its SHA
SHA is mandatory for updates. If it wasn't captured earlier in the conversation:
```
1. get_file_contents
owner, repo
ref: "main"
path: "docs/example.md"
→ read the top-level `sha` field (not content.sha)
2. create_or_update_file
owner, repo
path: "docs/example.md"
content: "<new base64-encoded content>"
message: "docs: update example"
branch_name: "main"
sha: "<sha from step 1>"
```
Do not guess or omit the SHA — the write either fails (409 on create-path fallback) or is rejected outright.
## Delete a file
Same SHA-first pattern, no fallback path:
```
1. get_file_contents owner, repo, ref: "main", path: "docs/old-example.md"
→ read the top-level `sha` field
2. delete_file
owner, repo
path: "docs/old-example.md"
message: "docs: remove old example"
branch_name: "main"
sha: "<sha from step 1>"
```

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Sources
## gitea-mcp-repo
**Description:** Official gitea-mcp repository (v1.3.0); operation/*.go source files documenting all 55 MCP tools, their parameters, and CLI flags.
**Source:** https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-mcp
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
**Contributing files:**
- SKILL.md (Gotchas, Reading, Writing — tool parameters and SHA/concurrency behavior, cross-checked live against the deployed MCP tool schemas via ToolSearch)
- references/examples.md (canonical call sequences)
## gitea-mcp-slim-go
**Description:** Slim response shape structs from gitea-mcp source; defines exactly which fields the MCP server returns for files (top-level `sha`, no nested `content.sha`) and directory/tree entries.
**Source:** https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-mcp/raw/branch/main/operation/repo/slim.go
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
**Contributing files:**
- SKILL.md (Gotchas — top-level `sha` field location, `get_dir_contents`/`get_repository_tree` not being usable SHA sources for a file write)
- references/examples.md (SHA-first update/delete sequences)
## context7-websites-gitea
**Description:** Official Gitea docs mirror on Context7 (docs.gitea.com content) — confirms direct-commit file editing through the web UI is a first-class, expected workflow rather than an API-only escape hatch.
**Source:** context7:/websites/gitea
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
**Contributing files:**
- SKILL.md (Gotchas — "Direct commits to a branch are a first-class action, not a workaround")