docs(kyberforge): refresh the apm-workflow exemplar figures after its retrofit

body-discipline.md and contract.md both cite apm-workflow by hard number
as the reference dispatch shape, and instruct authors to calibrate against
its body word count. The retrofit in 1e4aab5 moved every one of those
figures: body 421 -> 237, whole-file 554 -> 304, references 3,006 ->
3,222. Measured, not estimated.

The quoted closing line was stale too -- it now carries a continuation
clause, so it is quoted with an ellipsis rather than as a full sentence.

These are positive exemplars in live guidance, so they are refreshed
rather than pinned. That is the opposite treatment from the git-commits
negative example in the same file, which is pinned to 5e23250 precisely
so it keeps describing the pre-retrofit state. ADR-0020 carries the same
figures and is deliberately left alone: it self-pins every citation to
base commit f9b919d, and refreshing it would destroy the record of what
the decision was taken against.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-30 16:31:43 +00:00
parent aa982b9d26
commit 264a5dbd67
4 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ table** plus the gates common to every branch, and each flow lives in its own se
`references/` file. Inlining all of them is a FAIL regardless of word count, because every
invocation then pays for every branch it did not take.
The reference shape in this repo is `apm-workflow`: a **421-word body** dispatching to roughly
3,000 words of references across five mutually exclusive invocations. Its whole-file count is 554
words — cite 421 when calibrating a body, or the conflation this section warns against reappears
The reference shape in this repo is `apm-workflow`: a **237-word body** dispatching to roughly
3,200 words of references across five mutually exclusive invocations. Its whole-file count is 304
words — cite 237 when calibrating a body, or the conflation this section warns against reappears
in the finding itself.
Note its wiring: a three-column table (invocation, action, reference file) closed by one line,
*"Read only the reference file matching the requested action."* That is the endorsed shape, and it
*"Read only the reference file matching the requested action …"* That is the endorsed shape, and it
is why the literal-conditional requirement above exempts a body that dispatches. Do not flag it.
## Gotchas sections

View File

@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ A generic pointer ("see references/ for details") is a Vale error — the agent
**Dispatch is mandatory at two or more mutually exclusive flows.** The body carries the dispatch
table and the gates common to every branch; each flow gets its own self-contained `references/`
file. Exemplar: the `apm-workflow` skill — a **421-word body** dispatching to 3,006 words of
references. Calibrate against 421: that file's whole-file count is 554 words, and aiming at that
file. Exemplar: the `apm-workflow` skill — a **237-word body** dispatching to 3,222 words of
references. Calibrate against 237: that file's whole-file count is 304 words, and aiming at that
number instead overshoots the body budget by ~30%.
**Length.** 600 words SUGGESTION, 900 words FAIL, counting the **body only** — everything after

View File

@@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ table** plus the gates common to every branch, and each flow lives in its own se
`references/` file. Inlining all of them is a FAIL regardless of word count, because every
invocation then pays for every branch it did not take.
The reference shape in this repo is `apm-workflow`: a **421-word body** dispatching to roughly
3,000 words of references across five mutually exclusive invocations. Its whole-file count is 554
words — cite 421 when calibrating a body, or the conflation this section warns against reappears
The reference shape in this repo is `apm-workflow`: a **237-word body** dispatching to roughly
3,200 words of references across five mutually exclusive invocations. Its whole-file count is 304
words — cite 237 when calibrating a body, or the conflation this section warns against reappears
in the finding itself.
Note its wiring: a three-column table (invocation, action, reference file) closed by one line,
*"Read only the reference file matching the requested action."* That is the endorsed shape, and it
*"Read only the reference file matching the requested action …"* That is the endorsed shape, and it
is why the literal-conditional requirement above exempts a body that dispatches. Do not flag it.
## Gotchas sections

View File

@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ A generic pointer ("see references/ for details") is a Vale error — the agent
**Dispatch is mandatory at two or more mutually exclusive flows.** The body carries the dispatch
table and the gates common to every branch; each flow gets its own self-contained `references/`
file. Exemplar: the `apm-workflow` skill — a **421-word body** dispatching to 3,006 words of
references. Calibrate against 421: that file's whole-file count is 554 words, and aiming at that
file. Exemplar: the `apm-workflow` skill — a **237-word body** dispatching to 3,222 words of
references. Calibrate against 237: that file's whole-file count is 304 words, and aiming at that
number instead overshoots the body budget by ~30%.
**Length.** 600 words SUGGESTION, 900 words FAIL, counting the **body only** — everything after