docs: correct the claims this review found false
AGENTS.md told an offline agent to push with SKIP=apm-marketplace-check and asserted that hook was "the only one whose failure mode is 'no network'". Running all 12 pre-push hooks under a network namespace shows two fail, for one shared cause: apm-pack-check-clean resolves the same remote entry. An exact pin does not remove the ls-remote, so both hooks are named now. AGENTS.md also said everything in a plugin root except .apm/ is generated. Plugin roots carry hand-authored README.md, docs/, bin/, sources.md and .mcp.json, so an agent would hunt for an .apm/ source that does not exist or refuse the edit. The rule is positional: immunity belongs to the plugin root, and anything inside a mirrored directory is still rm -rf'd. ADR-0017 said apm strips a hooks field. The real loop is (agents, skills, commands, instructions) -- hooks absent, instructions never mentioned -- and it can never fire, because synthesize_plugin_json_from_apm_yml only emits the eight identity fields. The decision stands; the mechanism was overstated. Its mcpServers amendment is rewritten for the pointer payload and now records the real reason: inlining bypassed apm's credential sanitizer. ADR-0015's owner.email and version-pin passages are corrected against the apm source, and ADR-0016 gains the disallowedTools amendment. agent-audit's allowlist is data, so it gains disallowedTools too -- the ADR and the validator that enforces it had come apart. architecture.md described a root CLAUDE.md that imports two files (it imports one, plus an RTK block) and pointed at an ADR index that does not exist. Seven skill READMEs listed tests/ files the mirror strips, promising installed users files their install lacks; those rows are marked source-only, with the depth-4 template tests explicitly called out as surviving. And plugins/kyberforge/hooks/README.md, deleted during the conversion and preserved nowhere, is restored to a path the mirror does not own -- verified by running a sync against a scratch copy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X7GvKuJfy2WrdBmUttV4DT
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Patterns observed during development of this repo. Three or more entries on the same pattern → promote to CONTEXT.md (or the relevant instruction file) as a standing rule.
|
||||
|
||||
**Graduation rule:** When three or more entries cover the same pattern, the human reviews and promotes it to the appropriate standing location: `CONTEXT.md` for domain-level principles, `core/instructions/coding.md` for coding conventions, `core/instructions/git.md` for git conventions, or `core/instructions/testing.md` for testing conventions. The graduated entries are marked `[graduated → target file]` rather than deleted (audit trail).
|
||||
**Graduation rule:** When three or more entries cover the same pattern, the human reviews and promotes it to the appropriate standing location: `CONTEXT.md` for domain-level principles, `core/instructions/coding.md` for coding conventions, `core/instructions/testing.md` for testing conventions, or `core/instructions/subagent-orchestration.md` for delegation conventions. Those four are the whole set — `core/instructions/` holds `coding.md`, `governance.md`, `subagent-orchestration.md` and `testing.md`, and nothing else. Git conventions have no standing file of their own: promote them to `core/instructions/coding.md`, or create a new instruction file deliberately rather than assuming one exists. The graduated entries are marked `[graduated → target file]` rather than deleted (audit trail).
|
||||
|
||||
**Who writes here:** The session-handoff skill (Chunk 3) prompts LESSONS.md extraction before closing a session. The human may also write directly.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ Issue files frequently referenced "the workflow defined in `docs/notes/skill-imp
|
||||
|
||||
The repo CLAUDE.md instructs agents to read CONTEXT.md at session start, but agents skip this in practice — defaulting to reading only what's directly relevant to the immediate prompt (e.g. the skills folder). The governance.md works because `@import` is technically enforced by Claude Code. Fix: (1) add `@CONTEXT.md` to repo CLAUDE.md using `@import` to make it always-loaded; (2) add a "Key decisions" section to CONTEXT.md with one-line resolved-ADR summaries so locked choices are always in context.
|
||||
|
||||
**Status (2026-08-14): neither part landed.** Root `CLAUDE.md` imports `@AGENTS.md` only — no `@CONTEXT.md` — and `CONTEXT.md` has no "Key decisions" section. The behavioral hope this entry diagnosed is still the only mechanism in place: `AGENTS.md` carries the line "Read CONTEXT.md at the start of every session in this repo," which is loaded but is itself an instruction, not an import. The proposal above is open work, not a record of a completed change.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-17 — Instruction rules lose to RLHF defaults without specificity
|
||||
|
||||
Behavioral tests (2026-05-17) showed three communication/behavior rules failing: exploratory question format (gave verbose multi-bullet answer instead of 2-3 sentences), file edit intent (asked for clarification instead of stating intent and proceeding), and push confirmation (went straight to tool call instead of asking first). All three rules are present in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` as one-liner statements. The RLHF-trained defaults (thorough answers, risk-averse clarification seeking, fast execution) consistently outcompete thin rules. Fix: rewrite failing rules with specificity, a counter-example, and a boundary statement — not just a single-line imperative.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user