docs: trim repeated boilerplate in git, gitea, and bin skills
Finding 13: five blocks of near-identical wording were repeated across skills within a plugin — the gitea "resolve owner and repo" step (5 skills), the 404-masks-403 note (6 files), the manual pagination explanation (8 files), the git plugin's main/master force-push refusal (7 files, some with multiple internal restatements), and the bin skills' domain-glossary/ADR paragraph (5 skills). Tightened each instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting to a shared file, which ADR-0014's one-file-per-skill install constraint rules out. Left the three git skills' structured-result JSON shapes alone (coupled to the separate, out-of-scope git-orchestrate merge candidate, finding 19). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: >
|
||||
Not branch lifecycle -> `git-branches`.
|
||||
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
version: "0.1.5"
|
||||
version: "0.1.6"
|
||||
category: git
|
||||
source_keys:
|
||||
- conventional-commits-spec
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ allowed-tools: Bash
|
||||
## Gotchas
|
||||
|
||||
- **Run git as `rtk git <subcommand>`, never bare `git`** — org convention, in `&&` chains too, except where a skill's Gotchas name a specific bare-git case (interactive rebase here).
|
||||
- **Refuse to force-push `main`/`master`** — a rewrite leaves the branch diverged and the reflex is to force it back; safe only where nobody else has based work on it.
|
||||
- **Refuse to force-push `main`/`master`.** A rewrite diverges the branch and the reflex is to force it back — safe only where nobody else has based work on it.
|
||||
- **`reset --hard` is a confirmation gate, not a default.** It overwrites the working tree, and uncommitted edits it discards were never in git, so no reflog recovers them. Name what will be lost and offer a stash first.
|
||||
- **Never add `--no-verify`** — using it when a hook fails bypasses the QA gate the pipeline depends on. Only on the user's explicit demand, with a warning.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user