docs: trim repeated boilerplate in git, gitea, and bin skills

Finding 13: five blocks of near-identical wording were repeated across
skills within a plugin — the gitea "resolve owner and repo" step (5
skills), the 404-masks-403 note (6 files), the manual pagination
explanation (8 files), the git plugin's main/master force-push refusal
(7 files, some with multiple internal restatements), and the bin
skills' domain-glossary/ADR paragraph (5 skills). Tightened each
instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting
to a shared file, which ADR-0014's one-file-per-skill install
constraint rules out. Left the three git skills' structured-result
JSON shapes alone (coupled to the separate, out-of-scope git-orchestrate
merge candidate, finding 19).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-12 19:48:19 +00:00
parent f5e4d0d082
commit 6cfc3577e2
49 changed files with 128 additions and 135 deletions

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: >
Not branch lifecycle -> `git-branches`.
metadata:
version: "0.1.5"
version: "0.1.6"
category: git
source_keys:
- conventional-commits-spec
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ allowed-tools: Bash
## Gotchas
- **Run git as `rtk git <subcommand>`, never bare `git`** — org convention, in `&&` chains too, except where a skill's Gotchas name a specific bare-git case (interactive rebase here).
- **Refuse to force-push `main`/`master`** — a rewrite leaves the branch diverged and the reflex is to force it back; safe only where nobody else has based work on it.
- **Refuse to force-push `main`/`master`.** A rewrite diverges the branch and the reflex is to force it back — safe only where nobody else has based work on it.
- **`reset --hard` is a confirmation gate, not a default.** It overwrites the working tree, and uncommitted edits it discards were never in git, so no reflog recovers them. Name what will be lost and offer a stash first.
- **Never add `--no-verify`** — using it when a hook fails bypasses the QA gate the pipeline depends on. Only on the user's explicit demand, with a warning.