docs: trim repeated boilerplate in git, gitea, and bin skills
Finding 13: five blocks of near-identical wording were repeated across skills within a plugin — the gitea "resolve owner and repo" step (5 skills), the 404-masks-403 note (6 files), the manual pagination explanation (8 files), the git plugin's main/master force-push refusal (7 files, some with multiple internal restatements), and the bin skills' domain-glossary/ADR paragraph (5 skills). Tightened each instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting to a shared file, which ADR-0014's one-file-per-skill install constraint rules out. Left the three git skills' structured-result JSON shapes alone (coupled to the separate, out-of-scope git-orchestrate merge candidate, finding 19). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: >
|
||||
agent caller -> `git-orchestrate`. Not Gitea -> `gitea-workflow`.
|
||||
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
version: "1.0.1"
|
||||
version: "1.0.2"
|
||||
category: git
|
||||
source_keys:
|
||||
- nvie-gitflow-post
|
||||
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ owns the request.
|
||||
4. **Gate destructive operations** — before force-push, branch deletion, rebase, or
|
||||
force-checkout, show what will happen and ask "Proceed?". Cancel gracefully if the user
|
||||
declines. Never supply the confirmation on the user's behalf. Some operations are refusals, not
|
||||
confirmations: never offer "Proceed?" for a force-push of `main` or `master`.
|
||||
confirmations — never offer "Proceed?" for a force-push of `main`/`master`.
|
||||
5. **Invoke the `git-orchestrate` agent** with `operation`, `parameters` (user-provided or
|
||||
inferred), `context` (step 3 plus the session context), and `confirm: true` only for a
|
||||
destructive op the user approved in step 4.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user