docs: trim repeated boilerplate in git, gitea, and bin skills
Finding 13: five blocks of near-identical wording were repeated across skills within a plugin — the gitea "resolve owner and repo" step (5 skills), the 404-masks-403 note (6 files), the manual pagination explanation (8 files), the git plugin's main/master force-push refusal (7 files, some with multiple internal restatements), and the bin skills' domain-glossary/ADR paragraph (5 skills). Tightened each instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting to a shared file, which ADR-0014's one-file-per-skill install constraint rules out. Left the three git skills' structured-result JSON shapes alone (coupled to the separate, out-of-scope git-orchestrate merge candidate, finding 19). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ runtime error from Gitea rather than a client-side validation error.
|
||||
label_read method: "list_repo_labels" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> per_page: 50
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Paginate (`page: 1, 2, ...`) until the returned count is less than `per_page`. This is the only way
|
||||
to build a complete name → ID map — there is no lookup-by-name endpoint.
|
||||
Paginate (`page: 1, 2, ...`) until the count is below `per_page` — the only way to build a complete
|
||||
name → ID map, since there's no lookup-by-name endpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
Every returned repo label carries its own `exclusive` boolean, so exclusivity is always *readable*
|
||||
per repo label. That does not contradict `label_write`'s schema, which annotates `exclusive` as
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user