fix(kyberforge): announce every provenance skip and scope checks 7-8 to source indexes

The clean provenance bill was an artifact. Checks 7 and 8 assume `Research doc:`
names a source index whose H2s are slugs, but 30 of 121 corpus entries point at
topic content documents whose H2s are topics. Those 30 produced every new check-7
INFO — all false positives. Check 8 aimed at the same documents, which carry no
`Status:` line at all, would have emitted a large false-FAIL flood; the only thing
preventing it was an unannounced `rd_status != extracted` skip. So "0 new FAILs"
rested on exactly the fail-open class this branch exists to remove, and naively
fixing the skip would have turned the branch red.

Checks 7/8 now run only when the research doc's basename is `sources.md`, and every
other case emits a visible INFO naming the slug. The dangling-path INFO stays ahead
of the basename gate, because a path that does not resolve is rot whatever it is
named. `parse_status` accepts the bullet form and a trailing note after the
backticked value, so a status it cannot read no longer reads as "nothing to check".

Corpus: 36 INFOs of which 30 were false, to 56 of which none are. FAIL stays 0, and
no Status line flipped to `extracted` under the new parser, so no FAIL was
suppressed by luck.

Also closed, each a silent pass: a nonexistent directory, a directory with no
SKILL.md, and extra arguments now exit 2; a UTF-8 BOM no longer defeats frontmatter
parsing; the bare `except Exception: return False` that turned an unreadable file
into a clean pass is gone, with all reads pinned to UTF-8; check 3 walks nested
`references/` subdirectories; `FILL IN:` at end of line no longer escapes checks 1
and 6; duplicate `## slug` blocks and repeated `Research doc:` lines are announced
rather than half-read.

The agent-audit copy carried all of the above unfixed and is now ported, minus the
four fixes that are genuinely N/A at agent scope — it reads a plugin-root
`sources.md` and has no checks 7/8 and no `references/` tree. Its silent exit 0 for
a file outside plugin scope is preserved deliberately: that is a verdict about a
valid file, not a skip, and `check-scope-walkup-sync.sh` pins it. Every exit-2 gate
therefore decides from the argument alone, before the walk-up runs.

`validation-scripts.md` said flatly that silence from the validator is a pass, not
a skip. That sentence is what made a typo'd path dangerous, and both copies are
corrected here. The matching SKILL.md exit-code guidance lands with the audit
rubric change, which touches the same files.

Tests: skill-audit 45 to 65, agent-audit 24 to 43, every new case proven by mutation.

Refs: #111, #118, #121
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-01 12:37:32 +00:00
parent 9fe734573d
commit 88866b81a3
10 changed files with 1959 additions and 204 deletions

View File

@@ -99,9 +99,12 @@ Three ways to read the result wrong:
## Script-specific failures
- **`validate-provenance.sh` printed nothing.** That is a pass, not a skip. It also exits 0
silently when the skill has no `source_keys` and no `references/sources.md` — nothing to
validate is not a finding.
- **`validate-provenance.sh` printed nothing *and exited 0*.** That is a pass, not a skip — it
exits 0 silently when the skill has no `source_keys` and no `references/sources.md`, and nothing
to validate is not a finding. Check the exit code before you believe the silence: a target that
is not a directory, a directory holding no `SKILL.md`, a missing or extra argument, and an absent
`python3` all exit **2** with a message on stderr. Exit 2 means the script never ran — report it
as an unaudited dimension, never as a pass and never as a finding. Exit 1 is findings.
- **`vale` reports `0 files`.** Treat the pass as NOT RUN, not as clean, and fall back to full
Step 3 judgment for the dimensions it would have covered. The bundled `Kyberforge` style is
scoped by glob in `assets/vale/.vale.ini`; a file outside those globs is silently not linted.

View File

@@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ Arguments:
Exit codes:
0 All checks passed (or nothing to validate)
1 One or more checks failed
2 Usage error, or the argument is not a skill directory
An exit code of 2 is NOT a finding. SKILL.md tells the auditor to surface a
non-zero exit as findings, so a usage error leaving exit 1 with nothing on
stdout was indistinguishable from a clean-but-failing run. Environment and
argument problems exit 2; only real findings exit 1.
Checks performed:
0 source_keys present but references/sources.md absent
@@ -32,6 +38,12 @@ Checks performed:
resolved; a path that still does not resolve is reported as an INFO saying
checks 7 and 8 did not run, never skipped silently.
8 Extracted non-(none) slug in research doc present in sources.md
Checks 7 and 8 apply ONLY when the Research doc value names a research SOURCE
INDEX — a file whose basename is sources.md, whose H2 headings ARE source
slugs. A Research doc pointing at a topic document is reported as an INFO
saying the two checks are not applicable, and every other reason they do not
run is announced the same way.
EOF
}
@@ -40,11 +52,57 @@ if [[ "${1:-}" == "--help" || "${1:-}" == "-h" ]]; then
exit 0
fi
# Usage and environment problems exit 2, findings exit 1. See the usage text
# above for why the two must not share a code. This is a deliberate divergence
# from validate.sh, which has no 2 tier: validate.sh always prints PASS lines,
# so a usage error there is visibly not a findings report. This script prints
# NOTHING on a clean run, so exit 1 plus empty stdout was the only signal a
# caller got either way.
if [[ $# -lt 1 ]]; then
echo "Error: skill-dir is required." >&2
echo "" >&2
usage >&2
exit 1
exit 2
fi
# Extra positional arguments were silently dropped, so a typo'd flag or a second
# path looked like it had been honoured.
if [[ $# -gt 1 ]]; then
echo "Error: expected exactly one argument, got $#: $*" >&2
echo "" >&2
usage >&2
exit 2
fi
# python3 is a HARD dependency. Without this preflight a missing interpreter
# produced 'line NN: python3: command not found' and exit 127 — an exit code no
# caller maps to anything, from a message that names this script's line number
# rather than the missing dependency.
if ! command -v python3 > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "Error: python3 is required but was not found on PATH." >&2
echo " Why: skipping the provenance checks entirely would be a vacuous pass." >&2
echo " Fix: install python3 (pre-commit itself is a Python application, so it is almost certainly already present)." >&2
exit 2
fi
# A path that is not a directory, or a directory that is not a skill, used to
# reach the Python body, find no sources.md and no source_keys, take the
# "nothing to validate" early exit and report exit 0 with no output — which
# references/validation-scripts.md explicitly told the auditor to read as a
# pass. A typo'd target was therefore indistinguishable from a clean skill.
# vale-wrap.sh hard-errors on a nonexistent path for exactly this reason.
if [[ ! -d "$1" ]]; then
echo "Error: not a directory: $1" >&2
echo " Why: a nonexistent target would otherwise report a silent pass." >&2
echo " Fix: pass the path of the skill directory to validate." >&2
exit 2
fi
if [[ ! -f "$1/SKILL.md" ]]; then
echo "Error: not a skill directory (no SKILL.md): $1" >&2
echo " Why: a directory with no SKILL.md has no provenance chain to validate, and reporting that as a pass hides the wrong-target mistake." >&2
echo " Fix: pass the skill directory itself, not its parent or its references/ subdirectory." >&2
exit 2
fi
python3 -u - "$1" <<'PYTHON'
@@ -52,13 +110,67 @@ import sys
import os
import re
# Output is UTF-8 for the same reason input is: under LC_ALL=C the streams
# default to ASCII, and every finding this script prints contains an em dash.
# Pinning only the reads moved the crash from the read to the write — a
# UnicodeEncodeError inside print_findings(), which loses the whole report
# after all the checks have already run.
for _stream in (sys.stdout, sys.stderr):
try:
_stream.reconfigure(encoding='utf-8')
except AttributeError: # pragma: no cover — Python < 3.7
pass
skill_dir = os.path.abspath(sys.argv[1])
sources_md_path = os.path.join(skill_dir, "references", "sources.md")
refs_dir = os.path.join(skill_dir, "references")
# --- Helpers ---
PLACEHOLDER_RE = re.compile(r'(?<!`)FILL IN:[^`\n]')
# The trailing character class used to be CONSUMING — `[^`\n]` — so a
# `FILL IN:` at end of line matched nothing and escaped checks 1 and 6
# entirely. `- **Description:** FILL IN:` is the most likely spelling of a
# half-written entry, and it was the one spelling the placeholder gate could
# not see. The exclusion it was really expressing is "not inside backticks",
# which a lookahead states without eating a character.
PLACEHOLDER_RE = re.compile(r'(?<!`)FILL IN:(?!`)')
# --- Input ----------------------------------------------------------------
# Ported from validate.sh, where the same two problems were already fixed.
#
# read_text() pins UTF-8 explicitly instead of inheriting
# locale.getpreferredencoding(), which is ASCII under LC_ALL=C — an ordinary em
# dash in a references file then aborted the run with a bare UnicodeDecodeError
# traceback, or, at the one call site that wrapped its read in `except
# Exception: return False`, reported the unreadable file as having no
# source_keys and therefore as clean. A file that genuinely is not UTF-8 still
# fails; it just says which file and why.
#
# strip_bom() runs on every read because a leading BOM defeats
# parse_frontmatter()'s `^---` anchor, which silently disabled check 2 on a
# BOM-prefixed SKILL.md: no frontmatter parsed means no source_keys parsed
# means nothing to validate.
class EncodingError(Exception):
pass
def strip_bom(text):
return text[1:] if text.startswith(u'\ufeff') else text
def read_text(path):
"""File contents as text, UTF-8 and BOM-free, with a diagnostic instead of a traceback."""
try:
with open(path, encoding='utf-8') as fh:
return strip_bom(fh.read())
except UnicodeDecodeError as exc:
raise EncodingError(
"not valid UTF-8 (%s at byte %d) — re-save the file as UTF-8; "
"this gate does not guess at other encodings"
% (exc.reason, exc.start))
def parse_frontmatter(content):
"""Return (frontmatter_str, body_str) or (None, content) if no frontmatter."""
@@ -219,20 +331,25 @@ def parse_contributing_files(content, slug):
return files or None
# ===== END SHARED CONTRIBUTING-FILES PARSER =====
def parse_research_doc(content, slug):
"""Find the Research doc value for a given slug H2 in content."""
def parse_research_docs(content, slug):
"""Every Research doc value under a given slug H2, in document order.
The caller uses the first and reports the rest. Returning only the first —
what this did before — meant a second '- **Research doc:**' line in one
entry was silently ignored, so an author who added a doc rather than
replacing one got checks 7 and 8 run against the old path and no hint that
the new one was never looked at.
"""
pattern = re.compile(
r'^## ' + re.escape(slug) + r'\s*\n(.*?)(?=^## |\Z)',
re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL
)
m = pattern.search(content)
if not m:
return None
return []
block = m.group(1)
rd_m = re.search(r'^\- \*\*Research doc:\*\* (.+)$', block, re.MULTILINE)
if not rd_m:
return None
return rd_m.group(1).strip()
return [v.strip() for v in
re.findall(r'^\- \*\*Research doc:\*\* (.+)$', block, re.MULTILINE)]
# A Research doc value is a path, and very often a path PLUS an annotation
# naming the section the slug came from:
@@ -264,8 +381,27 @@ def research_doc_is_none(value):
"""
return re.match(r'\(?none\b', value.strip(), re.IGNORECASE) is not None
# The Status value is what gates check 8, so every spelling this parser fails
# to read is a check that does not run. Two were unreadable:
#
# - **Status:** `extracted` — partial fetch (a trailing note)
# **Status:** (the bullet form, the same
# - `extracted` shape parse_contributing_files
# already accepts)
#
# Both used to parse to a string that compared unequal to "`extracted`", and
# check 8 skipped on that inequality without a word. Returning the BACKTICKED
# TOKEN — not the whole line — is what makes the trailing note harmless, and it
# lets the caller name the actual status when it announces a skip.
STATUS_TOKEN_RE = re.compile(r'^`([^`]*)`')
def parse_status(content, slug):
"""Find the Status value for a given slug H2 in content."""
"""Find the Status value for a given slug H2 in content.
Returns the status with its backticks stripped ('extracted', 'referenced',
'no content extracted'), or None when the entry has no Status line.
"""
pattern = re.compile(
r'^## ' + re.escape(slug) + r'\s*\n(.*?)(?=^## |\Z)',
re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL
@@ -274,10 +410,28 @@ def parse_status(content, slug):
if not m:
return None
block = m.group(1)
raw = None
st_m = re.search(r'^\- \*\*Status:\*\* (.+)$', block, re.MULTILINE)
if not st_m:
return None
return st_m.group(1).strip()
if st_m:
raw = st_m.group(1).strip()
else:
st_m = re.search(r'^\*\*Status:\*\*\s*$', block, re.MULTILINE)
if not st_m:
return None
for line in block[st_m.end():].splitlines():
line = line.strip()
if not line:
continue
if not line.startswith("- "):
break
raw = line[2:].strip()
break
if raw is None:
return None
token = STATUS_TOKEN_RE.match(raw)
return token.group(1).strip() if token else raw
def find_repo_root(start_dir):
"""Walk up from start_dir until we find a directory containing .git."""
@@ -293,13 +447,22 @@ def find_repo_root(start_dir):
findings = []
has_fail = False
# A finding identical in every field is the same finding, and the same file is
# now reached by more than one check — the walk that looks for source_keys and
# check 3 both read every references/*.md, so an unreadable one would otherwise
# be reported twice with the same words. Distinct findings about the same file
# still both appear.
def _record(entry):
if entry not in findings:
findings.append(entry)
def emit_fail(desc, fpath, why, fix):
global has_fail
has_fail = True
findings.append(("FAIL", desc, fpath, why, fix, None))
_record(("FAIL", desc, fpath, why, fix, None))
def emit_info(desc, fpath, note):
findings.append(("INFO", desc, fpath, None, None, note))
_record(("INFO", desc, fpath, None, None, note))
def print_findings():
for entry in findings:
@@ -321,11 +484,22 @@ def print_findings():
# --- Scan for any file with source_keys ---
def file_has_source_keys(fpath):
def emit_unreadable(rel, exc):
"""Report a file this script cannot decode. Never a silent skip."""
emit_fail(
f"File is {exc}",
rel,
f"'{rel}' cannot be decoded, so its frontmatter — and any source_keys in it — "
f"cannot be read. This used to be swallowed by a bare 'except Exception: return False', "
f"which reported the unreadable file as having no source_keys and therefore as clean.",
f"Re-save '{rel}' as UTF-8."
)
def file_has_source_keys(fpath, rel):
try:
with open(fpath) as f:
content = f.read()
except Exception:
content = read_text(fpath)
except EncodingError as exc:
emit_unreadable(rel, exc)
return False
fm, _ = parse_frontmatter(content)
if fm is None:
@@ -338,26 +512,33 @@ def find_files_with_source_keys():
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(skill_dir):
# Skip hidden dirs
dirs[:] = [d for d in dirs if not d.startswith('.')]
for fname in files:
for fname in sorted(files):
if fname.endswith('.md'):
abs_path = os.path.join(root, fname)
if file_has_source_keys(abs_path):
rel = os.path.relpath(abs_path, skill_dir)
rel = os.path.relpath(abs_path, skill_dir)
if file_has_source_keys(abs_path, rel):
results.append((rel, abs_path))
return results
sources_md_exists = os.path.isfile(sources_md_path)
files_with_source_keys = find_files_with_source_keys()
# Early exit: nothing to validate
# Early exit: nothing to validate. The scan itself can raise a finding — an
# unreadable file — so print before leaving; the clean case still prints
# nothing and exits 0.
if not sources_md_exists and not files_with_source_keys:
sys.exit(0)
print_findings()
sys.exit(1 if has_fail else 0)
# Load sources.md if it exists
sources_content = None
if sources_md_exists:
with open(sources_md_path) as f:
sources_content = f.read()
try:
sources_content = read_text(sources_md_path)
except EncodingError as exc:
emit_unreadable("references/sources.md", exc)
print_findings()
sys.exit(1)
sources_slugs = set(parse_h2_slugs(sources_content))
else:
sources_slugs = set()
@@ -388,8 +569,11 @@ for line in sources_content.splitlines():
# --- Check 2: source_keys in SKILL.md → slug exists in sources.md ---
skill_md_path = os.path.join(skill_dir, "SKILL.md")
if os.path.isfile(skill_md_path):
with open(skill_md_path) as f:
skill_content = f.read()
try:
skill_content = read_text(skill_md_path)
except EncodingError as exc:
emit_unreadable("SKILL.md", exc)
skill_content = ""
skill_fm, _ = parse_frontmatter(skill_content)
skill_source_keys = parse_source_keys(skill_fm)
for slug in skill_source_keys:
@@ -402,16 +586,29 @@ if os.path.isfile(skill_md_path):
)
# --- Check 3: source_keys in references/*.md → slug exists in sources.md (INFO if no source_keys) ---
# os.walk, not os.listdir: find_files_with_source_keys() above already walks
# references/ recursively, so a source_keys-bearing file in
# references/<subdir>/ was collected there — and then never validated here,
# because the flat listdir could not see it. The two halves of the same check
# disagreed about which files exist.
if os.path.isdir(refs_dir):
for fname in sorted(os.listdir(refs_dir)):
if not fname.endswith('.md'):
continue
if fname == "sources.md":
continue
fpath = os.path.join(refs_dir, fname)
ref_paths = []
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(refs_dir):
dirs[:] = sorted(d for d in dirs if not d.startswith('.'))
for fname in sorted(files):
if not fname.endswith('.md'):
continue
fpath = os.path.join(root, fname)
if os.path.relpath(fpath, refs_dir) == "sources.md":
continue
ref_paths.append(fpath)
for fpath in ref_paths:
rel = os.path.relpath(fpath, skill_dir)
with open(fpath) as f:
ref_content = f.read()
try:
ref_content = read_text(fpath)
except EncodingError as exc:
emit_unreadable(rel, exc)
continue
ref_fm, _ = parse_frontmatter(ref_content)
ref_keys = parse_source_keys(ref_fm)
if not ref_keys:
@@ -442,9 +639,32 @@ if os.path.isdir(refs_dir):
repo_root = find_repo_root(skill_dir)
# Collect all research doc paths we'll check (for Check 8)
research_docs_seen = {} # abs_path → set of slugs in sources.md that reference it
research_docs_seen = {} # abs_path → (rel_path, slugs referencing it, content)
for slug in parse_h2_slugs(sources_content):
# Every per-slug parser below — parse_contributing_files, parse_research_docs,
# parse_status — locates its block with pattern.search(), so a slug written
# twice resolves to the FIRST block every time. Iterating the raw heading list
# therefore checked the first block's fields twice and the second block's
# never: a duplicated slug is half-validated, and looked fully validated. The
# duplicate is announced and the repeat visit dropped.
all_slugs = parse_h2_slugs(sources_content)
unique_slugs = []
for _slug in all_slugs:
if _slug in unique_slugs:
continue
unique_slugs.append(_slug)
_count = all_slugs.count(_slug)
if _count > 1:
emit_info(
f"Duplicate '## {_slug}' entry in sources.md — only the first block is checked",
f"references/sources.md (## {_slug})",
f"'## {_slug}' appears {_count} times. Every field parser here takes the first match, so the "
f"second and later blocks' Contributing files, Research doc and Status are never validated — "
f"checks 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 did not run for them. "
f"Merge the blocks into one entry, or give each a distinct slug and reference it from source_keys."
)
for slug in unique_slugs:
# Checks 4 and 5: Contributing files exist, and back-reference the slug.
# `[]` and None are NOT the same answer here. `[]` is the author writing
# "(none)" — there is nothing to check and the skip is correct. None is a
@@ -478,8 +698,11 @@ for slug in parse_h2_slugs(sources_content):
# Skip sources.md itself
if cf_rel == "references/sources.md":
continue
with open(cf_abs) as f:
cf_content = f.read()
try:
cf_content = read_text(cf_abs)
except EncodingError as exc:
emit_unreadable(cf_rel, exc)
continue
cf_fm, _ = parse_frontmatter(cf_content)
cf_keys = parse_source_keys(cf_fm)
if slug not in cf_keys:
@@ -491,7 +714,17 @@ for slug in parse_h2_slugs(sources_content):
)
# Check 6: Research doc field required
rd_value = parse_research_doc(sources_content, slug)
rd_values = parse_research_docs(sources_content, slug)
if len(rd_values) > 1:
emit_info(
f"Multiple '- **Research doc:**' lines for '{slug}' — only the first is used",
f"references/sources.md (## {slug})",
f"The '## {slug}' entry has {len(rd_values)} Research doc lines; checks 7 and 8 ran against the first "
f"('{rd_values[0]}') and never looked at the rest. "
f"Keep one Research doc line per entry — if a slug genuinely came from two documents, split it into two slugs, "
f"or name the extra document inside the first value's annotation where it is at least visible."
)
rd_value = rd_values[0] if rd_values else None
if rd_value is None:
emit_fail(
f"Research doc field missing",
@@ -537,9 +770,41 @@ for slug in parse_h2_slugs(sources_content):
f"Point the value at one existing file — a brace expansion, a comma-separated list of paths, or a bare section title does not resolve — "
f"or record '(none)' if no research doc backs this entry."
)
elif os.path.basename(rd_path) != "sources.md":
# Checks 7 and 8 both assume the Research doc is a research
# SOURCE INDEX — a sources.md whose H2 headings ARE source
# slugs. 30 of the 121 corpus entries point instead at a TOPIC
# DOCUMENT (remotes.md, gitflow.md, api-reference.md), whose
# H2s are headings like '## Core Philosophy'. A slug can never
# match one, so check 7 reported all 30 as "slug not found" —
# every one a false positive — and check 8, aimed at documents
# that carry no '- **Status:**' line at all, was saved from a
# matching flood of false FAILs only by an UNANNOUNCED skip on
# that missing status. The premise, not the corpus, was wrong.
#
# A topic-document reference is a legitimate, useful value; it
# just is not something these two checks can verify. Say that
# once, out loud, instead of failing 30 entries for it.
emit_info(
f"Upstream checks not applicable for '{slug}' — research doc '{rd_path}' is a topic document, not a source index",
f"references/sources.md (## {slug})",
f"Checks 7 and 8 match slugs against the H2 headings of a research source index — a file named 'sources.md', "
f"where each H2 IS a source slug. '{os.path.basename(rd_path)}' is a topic document, so its H2s are section "
f"headings and no slug will ever match one. Checks 7 and 8 did not run for this slug. "
f"This needs no fix: point the value at the research corpus's own sources.md only if you want the "
f"provenance link machine-verified."
)
else:
with open(rd_abs) as f:
rd_content = f.read()
try:
rd_content = read_text(rd_abs)
except EncodingError as exc:
emit_info(
f"Upstream checks skipped for '{slug}' — research doc '{rd_path}' is {exc}",
f"references/sources.md (## {slug})",
f"'{rd_path}' could not be decoded, so checks 7 and 8 did not run for this slug. "
f"Re-save the research doc as UTF-8."
)
continue
rd_slugs = set(parse_h2_slugs(rd_content))
if slug not in rd_slugs:
emit_info(
@@ -548,15 +813,15 @@ for slug in parse_h2_slugs(sources_content):
f"The research doc '{rd_path}' does not have a '## {slug}' heading. "
f"The provenance link may be imprecise — the slug name in sources.md may differ from the research doc's heading."
)
# Track for Check 8
# Track for Check 8. The content is carried with the entry so
# check 8 reuses this read rather than decoding the file a
# second time, with a second chance to fail differently.
if rd_abs not in research_docs_seen:
research_docs_seen[rd_abs] = (rd_path, set())
research_docs_seen[rd_abs] = (rd_path, set(), rd_content)
research_docs_seen[rd_abs][1].add(slug)
# --- Check 8: Upstream reverse ---
for rd_abs, (rd_rel, known_slugs) in research_docs_seen.items():
with open(rd_abs) as f:
rd_content = f.read()
for rd_abs, (rd_rel, known_slugs, rd_content) in research_docs_seen.items():
for rd_slug in parse_h2_slugs(rd_content):
# Parse this slug's Contributing files and Status in the research doc
rd_cf = parse_contributing_files(rd_content, rd_slug)
@@ -564,8 +829,25 @@ for rd_abs, (rd_rel, known_slugs) in research_docs_seen.items():
# Skip if the research doc explicitly records no contributing files
if rd_cf == []:
continue
# Skip if status is not `extracted`
if rd_status != "`extracted`":
# Skip if status is not `extracted` — and say so when the skip is what
# kept the slug out of the FAIL below. A status of `referenced` or
# `no content extracted` is a real reason not to demand the slug, but
# it was applied in silence, so an entry that should have been in
# sources.md and a status line nobody had updated produced the same
# output: nothing. Only a MATERIAL skip is announced; when the slug is
# already in sources.md the check passes either way and there is no
# fail-open to disclose.
if rd_status != "extracted":
if rd_slug not in sources_slugs:
shown = f"`{rd_status}`" if rd_status else "absent"
emit_info(
f"Check 8 skipped for research-doc slug '{rd_slug}' — its Status is {shown}, not `extracted`",
f"{rd_rel} (## {rd_slug})",
f"'{rd_rel}' has '## {rd_slug}' with contributing files but Status {shown}, and this skill's "
f"sources.md has no '## {rd_slug}' entry. Check 8 only demands an entry for an `extracted` slug, "
f"so it did not run here. If that status is stale — the content was extracted and the line was never "
f"updated — this skill is missing a source entry; if it is accurate, nothing needs doing."
)
continue
# This slug should be in sources.md
if rd_slug not in sources_slugs: