docs(adr): amend ADR-0007 and ADR-0015 for the CONTEXT.md trim
Why: b9c7762 gave dated amendments to ADR-0013, ADR-0015 and ADR-0017, but two
pointers were missed. ADR-0007 cited the "Provider-agnostic issue tracker"
glossary entry, which the trim renamed to "Issue". ADR-0015 cited the "lint
plugin" entry, which the trim deleted outright — and ADR-0015 was amended for
its other CONTEXT.md pointer in the same commit, so this one was missed inside
an already-edited file.
Implementation notes: ADR-0007 gets a dated parenthetical matching the pattern
the other three carry, confirming the entry survived under a new name rather
than being dropped. ADR-0015's Considered-options parenthetical is re-pointed
at docs/spec/architecture.md's plugin scope table, which now carries the
repo-agnostic-versus-marketplace-specific argument the deleted entry held, and
its existing 2026-08-17 supersession note is extended to record that second
redirect in one place.
Impact: all four ADRs that referenced moved CONTEXT.md content now say where the
content went. No decision is altered.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ Three alternatives were rejected. Keeping the file-based fallback adds code comp
|
||||
|
||||
The file-based model also had a structural weakness: issues in `docs/issues/` were invisible from the Gitea UI, making it impossible to track work, assign milestones, or filter by label without opening the repo locally. Gitea provides all of that natively.
|
||||
|
||||
The "Provider-agnostic issue tracker" glossary entry in CONTEXT.md is updated in the same workstream to remove the file-based phase framing. The `providers/gitea/` adapter path described in ADR-0011 was never implemented — Gitea integration runs entirely via MCP, not a provider adapter.
|
||||
The "Provider-agnostic issue tracker" glossary entry in CONTEXT.md is updated in the same workstream to remove the file-based phase framing. (Amended 2026-08-17: the CONTEXT.md trim renamed that entry to **Issue**; it still records Gitea as this repo's canonical tracker and still tells skills to say "linked issue" generically.) The `providers/gitea/` adapter path described in ADR-0011 was never implemented — Gitea integration runs entirely via MCP, not a provider adapter.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user