fix(git): stop prefixing rtk where it rewrites the output skills parse
The #113 sweep rested on CLAUDE.md's premise that rtk either filters or passes through unchanged, so prefixing is always safe. Measured against rtk 0.42.4, that premise is false for several of the commands the sweep prefixed, and two skills were left giving wrong answers silently. Why: - `rtk git worktree list --porcelain -z` discards both flags and renders its own format. The `locked`/`lock_reason` fields git-worktrees Step 2 must emit are absent entirely, and paths under $HOME are abbreviated to `~/`. - `rtk git branch --list <name>` prints a phantom `* ` line even when nothing matches, so git-branches' stated ambiguity test — "output from both means the name is ambiguous" — reported every name as ambiguous. `tag --list` is a clean passthrough, so only one half broke. - `rtk git diff --name-only`/`--name-status` append a `Changes:` trailer to output documented as "one per line"; `--word-diff` emits none of the `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers its table describes; `rtk git log -L` truncates each line at ~72 chars, on the one command whose purpose is showing line content. - `rtk git stash pop` prints only `FAILED: git stash pop`, swallowing the conflict diagnostic and retained-entry message the surrounding prose tells the agent to rely on. Implementation notes: - Eleven sites reverted to bare `git`, each carrying its reason inline so the next sweep does not undo it. `mergetool` and `rebase -i` are reverted on clause 3's interactive limb only: the TTY defect does not reproduce — rtk filters exactly twelve subcommands and execs the rest — and ADR-0023 records that measurement rather than a convenient one. - ADR-0023 states the rule repo-wide with a third clause: a command whose output the skill parses, or which is interactive, stays bare. `plugins/git/README.md` is reduced to a pointer; its claim that gitea skills "contain no git/rtk mentions at all" was false, and its citation of `hard-rules.md` pointed at a file containing no occurrence of "rtk". - Eight gitea sites swept, all verified byte-identical passthroughs first. - `scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh` gates clause 1. Run against main's pre-sweep corpus it reports 99 findings including every gitea site, so it would have caught the drift #113 was filed about. Impact: the gate covers clause 1 only, in shell-tagged fences and the opening span of Run cells. Clause 2 is not gateable — "Run `git switch`" and "`git switch` refuses" are the same tokens — and prose bullets are invisible to it. Both limits are recorded in gates.md rather than left implied. Refs: #113 ADR: 0023 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EeH8SCbcrCAQrtymkNuhKP
This commit is contained in:
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ compatibility: Requires Gitea MCP server configured with a token with write:repo
|
||||
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
category: integration
|
||||
version: "0.1.2"
|
||||
version: "0.1.3"
|
||||
source_keys:
|
||||
- gitea-mcp-repo
|
||||
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ allowed-tools: Bash mcp__gitea__list_branches mcp__gitea__create_branch mcp__git
|
||||
Before any tool call, extract `owner` and `repo` from the git remote:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git remote get-url origin
|
||||
rtk git remote get-url origin
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`get_me` and `list_my_repos` are blocked under the token scope this skill assumes, so the remote is the only source. If origin is not set or the URL is not a Gitea URL, stop and report: "No Gitea remote found — set origin to your Gitea instance URL."
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ create_branch owner: <owner> repo: <repo> branch: <new-name> old_branch: <source
|
||||
|
||||
Default dispatch: if the user gives a base ("branch off of X", "from X"), pass it as `old_branch`.
|
||||
If they don't specify a base and you're mid-task on a local branch, pass your current branch
|
||||
(`git branch --show-current`) as `old_branch` so the new branch forks from where you're actually
|
||||
(`rtk git branch --show-current`) as `old_branch` so the new branch forks from where you're actually
|
||||
working, rather than silently falling back to the repo default. If neither applies (e.g. a fresh
|
||||
top-level request with no working branch context), omit `old_branch` and let it default server-side.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user