Files
holocron/plugins/gitea/skills/gitea-issues/SKILL.md
Defame1297 3324a73225 feat(lint): expand Vale audit prefilter into a broader plugin-content harness
Deferred item from PR #85 review. Per ADR-0013: cherry-picks two low-noise
rules from trialing write-good/alex against the real corpus (VagueQualifier,
SentenceOpenerThereIs) into styles/Kyberforge rather than adopting either
package wholesale (both are tuned for blog prose and were noisy on this
repo's terse, imperative instruction files - see the ADR's rejected-rule
list). Adds a new skill-size-check pre-commit hook enforcing agentskills.io's
500-line/5,000-token SKILL.md ceiling, currently unenforced. Fixes the 28
resulting violations across 20 existing SKILL.md/agent files so the
enforcing pre-commit hook lands clean.

governance.md/CONTROLS.md were evaluated and excluded as rule sources -
they're org/CI-infrastructure controls, not prose patterns Vale can express.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QUDczvw1H3eEeMD29Q9Lbi
2026-08-08 20:20:58 +00:00

7.5 KiB

name, description, compatibility, metadata, allowed-tools
name description compatibility metadata allowed-tools
gitea-issues Use when reading or writing Gitea issues: listing repo issues, getting a single issue's details/ comments/labels, creating an issue, updating its state, adding or editing comments, applying labels via issue_write, or searching issues/PRs across repositories. Triggers on "create an issue", "what issues are open", "get issue #N", "close issue #N", "comment on issue #N", "search issues for X" — even when the user doesn't say "Gitea" explicitly. Composes gitea-labels- milestones for all label inference/resolution and milestone lookup — do not use this skill to manage label or milestone definitions themselves (create/edit/delete a label, create/close a milestone), that's gitea-labels-milestones directly. Do not use for pull requests (use gitea-prs) or for local git branch/commit work (use gitea-branches or git-branches). Requires Gitea MCP server configured with write:issue and write:repository token scopes. Requires git remote "origin" pointing to the Gitea instance for owner/repo resolution when invoked directly by a human; an orchestrating caller (e.g. gitea-workflow) may pass owner/repo already resolved.
category version source_keys
integration 0.1.0
gitea-mcp-repo
gitea-mcp-slim-go
context7-websites-gitea
context7-gitea-tea-cli
Bash mcp__gitea__list_issues mcp__gitea__issue_read mcp__gitea__issue_write mcp__gitea__search_issues

Gotchas

  • list_issues has no type or milestones parameter — despite api-reference.md documenting both. The live MCP schema (re-verified via ToolSearch at authoring time — see references/sources.md) only accepts owner, repo (required), state (default "all"), labels (array of label names), since, before (ISO 8601), page, per_page (default 30). This tool provides no way to filter issues-vs-PRs or by milestone. Since issues and PRs share one number space, list_issues results can include PR entries with no client-side filter to exclude them. If you need to know whether a specific number is a PR, call issue_read method: "get" and check is_pull — that field only appears on the single-item response, never in a list item. This exact drift (a prior skill trusted the research doc's type param and broke) is why this skill's reference files were re-verified live rather than copied from api-reference.md.
  • search_issues does have a working type filter ("issues" | "pulls") — unlike list_issues. Its labels parameter is also shaped differently: a comma-separated string, not an array of names.
  • Labels are numeric IDs on write, name strings on read. issue_write's labels parameter (used by add_labels/replace_labels) takes IDs. list_issues/issue_read return names. Never resolve this yourself — compose gitea-labels-milestones (see references/enrichments.md) to get IDs.
  • Milestone on issue_read is {id, title} — an object, not a bare string. This skill only ever needs the id. (The bare-title-string case only happens on the PR side, which is gitea-prs' problem, not this skill's.)
  • Closing-keyword auto-close behavior is plausible but unconfirmed in our research docs. Our research docs confirm Gitea does NOT auto-close an issue on a plain PR merge (unlike GitHub) — closing keywords like Fixes #N/Closes #N in a commit message are not documented one way or the other. After a PR merges (a gitea-prs operation), always re-check the issue's state here via issue_read method: "get" before deciding whether to close it manually — closing an already-closed issue is a harmless no-op, but don't assume a manual close is always needed.
  • Pagination is manual. list_issues and search_issues return one page at a time. Iterate page: 1, 2, ... until the returned count is less than per_page.
  • HTTP 404 may actually mean 403. Gitea hides permission errors as not-found. If a call 404s unexpectedly, verify the token holds write:issue scope (see references/issues.md's Token scope note) before concluding the issue doesn't exist.

Step 1 — Resolve owner and repo

Before any tool call, extract owner and repo from the git remote (skip this if an orchestrating caller already passed them in):

git remote get-url origin

If origin is not set or the URL is not a Gitea URL, stop and report: "No Gitea remote found — set origin to your Gitea instance URL."

Step 2 — Dispatch

Invocation Action
/gitea-issues or /gitea-issues list List issues (optional state filter)
/gitea-issues create Create an issue from conversation context — infers labels, checks milestone fit, applies a configured default assignee if set
/gitea-issues <N> Get issue details (flag it as a PR if is_pull: true)
/gitea-issues <N> comments Get an issue's comments
/gitea-issues close <N> Close an issue
/gitea-issues comment <N> Add a comment from conversation context
/gitea-issues search <query> Cross-repo search via search_issues

For full parameter detail on list_issues/issue_read/issue_write, read references/issues.md. For search_issues, read references/search.md. For the create-flow enrichments (label inference, milestone assignment, assignee workaround, dependency-linking), read references/enrichments.md.

Step 3 — Execute

list (default)

Call list_issues owner: <owner> repo: <repo> state: <"open"|"closed"|"all", default "all">. Remember: results may include PR entries (see Gotchas) — if the caller needs issues only, this tool cannot filter that server-side; note the limitation rather than silently mislabeling PR entries as issues.

create

  1. Extract title and body from conversation context (the most recent task, bug description, or explicit statement). Fall back to an empty body if nothing is available.
  2. Run the enrichment sequence in references/enrichments.md: infer labels (composing gitea-labels-milestones), check for a well-matched open milestone (composing the same skill), and check for a configured default assignee.
  3. Call issue_write method: "create" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> title: <title> body: <body> labels: [<resolved IDs, or omit>] milestone: <resolved ID, or omit> assignees: [<default login, or omit>].
  4. Fire immediately — no confirmation step for the create itself.

<N> (get)

Call issue_read method: "get" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N>. If is_pull: true, report that this number is actually a PR and suggest gitea-prs for full detail.

<N> comments

Call issue_read method: "get_comments" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N>.

close <N>

Call issue_write method: "update" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N> state: "closed". No method: "close" exists.

comment <N>

Extract the comment body from conversation context (same sourcing as create). Call issue_write method: "add_comment" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N> body: <body>.

search <query>

Call search_issues query: <query>, adding owner, state, type, or labels filters if the request narrows scope (e.g. "search open PRs for X" → type: "pulls" state: "open").

Step 4 — Report

For reads: a compact table or numbered list — number, title, state, labels, milestone.

For writes: confirm what was created/updated with the issue number and URL if returned.

For errors: surface the HTTP code and message; check token scope per the Gotchas if a 404 looks wrong.