holocron/plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/agent-audit/SKILL.md

name, description, allowed-tools, metadata

name	description	allowed-tools	metadata
agent-audit	Use when the user wants an agent definition audited — "audit this agent", "review my agent file", "is this ready to ship" — or after hand-editing an agent outside agent-author. Not applying fixes -> agent-author. Not a skill directory -> skill-audit.	Bash Read	version category source_keys 1.0.1 factory context7-websites-code-claude claude-code-plugins-docs claude-code-subagents-docs context7-github-en-copilot github-custom-agents-configuration

Gotchas

• Do not narrate PASS/FAIL per check while auditing. Gather findings internally and surface them only in the Step 4 report. Narrating each check as you go is the default failure mode here.
• Agents take the same 250/400-character description gates as skills and no body word gate at all — an agent body becomes the system prompt of a fresh context, so the 900-word skill ceiling does not transfer. Judge an over-long agent body through the delegation check, never by word count.
• At plugin/APM scope the agent is a single vendor-neutral file by design, so provider safety stops meaning Claude-Code-versus-Copilot field leakage there.
• Vale reporting 0 files scanned means NOT RUN, not clean. Fall back to full Step 3 judgment for every dimension it would have covered.

Step 1 — Deterministic checks

Resolve all three paths against this skill's own directory so they work from a repo checkout and an installed plugin cache alike. Run exactly:

bash scripts/validate.sh <agent-file>
bash scripts/validate-provenance.sh <agent-file>
bash scripts/vale-wrap.sh <agent-file> [<counterpart-file>]

validate.sh takes either half of a project/user-scope pair or the single plugin/APM-scope file, detects the provider from the extension and the scope by walking up, then checks required fields, kebab-case name, FILL IN: placeholders, template HTML comments left in frontmatter, the ADR-0020 description budget (250 chars SUGGESTION, 400 FAIL, measured on the folded YAML value) and the fields that scope permits. Its findings become the ### Structure dimension — its FAILs and its SUGGESTIONs both — except the ones the Step 2 scope contract re-routes.

If a validation script fails or cannot run — Bash denied, python3 or vale absent, references/field-inventory.md missing — read references/validation-scripts.md; what these scripts measure is not reproducible by reading.

validate-provenance.sh prints nothing on success, so read its exit code before you read its silence. 0 is a genuine pass, including the silent exit 0 at project or user scope, where plugin-scope provenance does not apply. 1 means real findings: its FAILs and INFOs become a separate ### Provenance dimension, and it emits Why and Fix itself — surface those verbatim. 2 means the check never ran — a bad argument or a missing dependency, reason on stderr, no findings and often no stdout at all. On a 2, report ### Provenance as unverified and quote the stderr reason; never grade it as a clean pass. validate.sh uses the same 2 tier.

vale-wrap.sh applies the bundled Kyberforge style as a prefilter. Pass no --config; the wrapper locates its own. At project/user scope pass both files of the pair, not only the one you were handed. Every rule is graded error, so every alert is a FAIL. Report each one citing its rule ID, filed under the dimension it belongs to, and do not re-derive it by judgment:

Rule	Dimension
Kyberforge.DescriptionOpener, Kyberforge.CompositionNote, Kyberforge.VagueWording, KyberforgeCopilot.ProactivePhrase	description
Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs, Kyberforge.PaddingPhrase	body

Step 2 — Read the agent and load its scope contract

Read the agent file end to end, and at project/user scope its counterpart too. A path containing .apm/agents/ is plugin/APM scope; anything else is project or user scope. Each contract names the dimensions that apply there and where validate.sh findings other than Structure belong:

Scope	Read
plugin/APM	references/scope-plugin-apm.md
project, user	references/scope-project-user.md

Step 3 — Qualitative audit

Read references/finding-criteria.md first — every dimension's FAIL and SUGGESTION criteria. Load the rubric below only for a dimension the criteria put in play: one carrying a candidate finding, or one where the criterion alone does not settle the call.

Dimension	Rubric
description	references/description-quality.md
body, delegation, comment-discipline	references/body-and-delegation.md

Each rubric is the reasoning behind its criteria, not a second copy of them. Cite file and line number for every finding.

Step 4 — Report

Open with a coverage line naming every dimension checked. At project/user scope:

Checked: structure · provider-safety · description · body · delegation · comment-discipline · pair-consistency · provenance

At plugin/APM scope, drop pair-consistency — there is no pair to check.

Then output only the dimensions that have findings, grouped under H3 headings, FAILs before SUGGESTIONs within each. Omit clean dimensions — their absence is what confirms they passed.

Each finding:

FAIL/SUGGESTION  <finding> — file:line
                 Why: <why this is a problem>
                 Fix: <exact change — quote before/after where applicable>

Close with a ## Result block holding one line: PASS, PASS (N suggestions), or FAIL (N fails · M suggestions), each optionally followed by · P info. INFO findings are observational and never change PASS/FAIL; omit · P info when there are none. Add a second line, Run agent-author to address findings., whenever there is at least one finding. Do not apply fixes — report and propose only.