Claude Code's (and Copilot's) native plugin installer has zero awareness of .apm/ nesting -- it convention-scans only flat skills/, agents/, commands/, hooks.json at each plugin's root. Confirmed via strings on the installed claude binary and live installs of git@holocron/gitea@holocron/kyberforge@ holocron, all reporting Skills(0) Agents(0) Hooks(0) post ADR-0015's apm conversion. Root cause (apm_cli/core/plugin_manifest.py): apm's plugin.json compiler deliberately strips skills/agents/commands keys, assuming the host already auto-discovers those convention directories -- it has no model of .apm/ being host-visible at all. Separately, apm's own bundle exporter (apm_cli/bundle/plugin_exporter.py, behind `apm pack --format plugin`) implements the correct .apm/ -> flat mapping, but only ever targeted build/<name>-<version>/, a path nothing in marketplace.json's source: points at. scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh wraps that bundle exporter and copies its agents/, skills/, commands/, instructions/, extensions/, and merged hooks.json back into each plugin's own root as a second tracked compiled-output category -- same governance status as .claude-plugin/plugin.json: generated from .apm/, never hand-edited. tests/ subdirectories are excluded from the mirror (dev fixtures, not host-visible runtime content; several hardcode a relative repo-root walk-up sized for the .apm/-nested depth, which breaks when duplicated one level shallower). Applied for real across all 6 plugins and verified two ways: `claude plugin validate --strict` passes on every real plugin directory, and a live `claude --plugin-dir <path> -p "list skills/agents"` behavioral test confirms content is now actually discovered. Also, from the same issue #90 review round: - scripts/check-manifests.sh pointed at each plugin's root-level plugin.json (checking skills/hooks/mcpServers/agents pointer fields) -- that file was a stale near-duplicate of .claude-plugin/plugin.json nothing else read or wrote, now deleted across all 6 plugins. check-manifests.sh is rewritten to validate .claude-plugin/plugin.json instead, and drops the pointer-field checks entirely (nothing to check -- those fields are correctly absent by design). Content-presence drift is now check-plugin-content-sync's job, a new pre-push hook wired in .pre-commit-config.yaml. docs/adr/0017 records the root cause and decision in full, including two rejected alternatives (patching plugin.json's path fields directly -- apm's compiler strips them on every run; pointing marketplace.json at apm pack's build/ output -- a version-suffixed non-source directory nothing can install from without an extra build step). ADR-0015 and CONTEXT.md are updated to point at it. Refs: #90
gitea-prs
List, read, create, update, merge, and review Gitea pull requests.
What it does
This skill handles the pull request lifecycle within the Gitea integration suite — listing and reading PRs (details, diff, changed files, CI status, reviews), creating and updating them (title, body, reviewers, labels, milestone), closing/reopening, merging with a chosen strategy and post-merge branch cleanup, and the full code-review flow (create a review with inline comments, submit it, dismiss or delete it). It composes gitea-labels-milestones for label/milestone ID resolution rather than duplicating that logic, and defers to gitea-issues for anything that turns out to be an issue rather than a PR (they share one number space) and to gitea-branches/gitea-files for the underlying branch/file operations behind a PR.
Usage
/gitea-prs
Describe the PR or review task: list PRs, get a PR's status/diff/reviews, create or update a PR, merge one, or create/submit/dismiss a code review. The skill will determine owner/repo from context and resolve any label or milestone names via gitea-labels-milestones before writing them.
Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
SKILL.md |
Skill instructions for agents — Gotchas, composition with gitea-labels-milestones, and the dispatch table |
references/pull-requests.md |
Execution detail for list_pull_requests, pull_request_read (get/get_diff/get_files/get_status), and pull_request_write (create/update/close/reopen/update_branch/add_reviewers/remove_reviewers) |
references/reviews.md |
Execution detail for pull_request_review_write (create/submit/delete/dismiss) and the review-related pull_request_read methods |
references/merging.md |
The merge workflow — CI vs. review/branch-protection gates, merge styles, branch cleanup, and the post-merge issue-close check |
references/sources.md |
Research sources backing the PR/review guidance |