Files
holocron/plugins/gitea/.apm/skills/gitea-prs/SKILL.md
Defame1297 3920dfab20 fix(skills): drop references to deleted config and .mcp.json files
Closes four PR #135 review findings in skill content.

#2 — plugins/git/config.example.json was deleted in f5e4d0d, but four
git-plugin files still told the agent to read it. The file only ever
carried branching_pattern, commit_style and rebase_strategy, so the
`base_branch` and scope instructions were wrong even before the
deletion. Each site now describes what the skill actually does: base is
`main` under GitHub Flow or `develop` when Gitflow is inferred, the
Gitflow fallback keys off the repo's own branches, the orchestrator
contract's `base` defaults to the inferred base branch, and the commit
scope is inferred from the changed files.

N6 — gitea-prs was the one gitea skill with no permission-scope caveat
on a 404. Added one alongside the existing issue/PR number-space
guidance rather than replacing it: a 404 is only evidence of
"that number is an issue" once write:repository scope is confirmed.

N4 — plugins/kyberforge/bin/README.md pointed at `.mcp.json`, but all
six plugin-root .mcp.json files were deleted in c96ca9c (ADR-0018).
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} itself is still live, so the sentence now points
at .apm/hooks/hooks.json, which kyberforge's own hook already uses.

N7 — not applied. The finding claimed a marketplace field override
emits a verbose BuildDiagnostic that `apm pack -v` surfaces, so
"silently wins" was wrong. apm 0.28.0 does construct the diagnostic in
marketplace/output_mappers.py, but nothing renders it:
_render_marketplace_result in commands/pack.py iterates `warnings`
only, and BuildReport.diagnostics has no consumer. Confirmed on a
fixture — neither `apm pack -v` nor APM_LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG prints the
override, and --check-versions reports [matches]. The existing wording
in configure.md and marketplace.md is correct, so both are unchanged.

Version bumps required by check-skill-version-bump.sh: git-branches
1.0.4 -> 1.0.5, git-commits 0.1.6 -> 0.1.7, gitea-prs 0.1.4 -> 0.1.5.
bin/README.md is outside any skill directory and needs no bump.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NwD8Egs5r4ndqeFLmhusX2
2026-09-19 21:17:14 +00:00

3.8 KiB

name, description, compatibility, metadata, allowed-tools
name description compatibility metadata allowed-tools
gitea-prs Use when listing, reading, creating, updating, merging, or reviewing Gitea pull requests — even when the user does not say "Gitea". A number the user names may be an issue or a PR — they share one number space — so confirm which domain applies before dispatching. Not issues -> `gitea-issues`. Not branch or commit operations -> `gitea-branches`. Requires Gitea MCP server configured with write:issue and write:repository token scopes. Requires git remote "origin" pointing to the Gitea instance for owner/repo resolution when invoked directly by a human; an orchestrating caller (e.g. gitea-workflow) may pass owner/repo already resolved.
category source_keys version
integration
gitea-mcp-repo
gitea-mcp-slim-go
context7-websites-gitea
context7-gitea-tea-cli
0.1.5
Bash mcp__gitea__list_pull_requests mcp__gitea__pull_request_read mcp__gitea__pull_request_write mcp__gitea__pull_request_review_write

Gotchas

  • Issues and PRs share one number space. #42 may be an issue rather than a PR. When unsure, call pull_request_read method: "get" and read a 404 as "that number is an issue" — hand it to gitea-issues.
  • 404 may also mean 403. Gitea masks permission errors as not-found, so a 404 is only evidence of an issue-not-PR once write:repository scope is confirmed — check the token scope before reporting a PR missing or handing the number to gitea-issues.
  • pull_request_write method: "create" discards most optional parameters in silence. milestone, assignee, assignees, reviewers and team_reviewers are accepted, dropped, and left out of the response, so a drop is indistinguishable from never passing them. labels does apply on "create", so labels landing is no evidence the milestone did.

Step 1 — Resolve owner and repo

Extract from the git remote before any tool call, skipping this when an orchestrating caller already passed them in:

rtk git remote get-url origin

No origin, or not a Gitea URL: stop and report "No Gitea remote found — set origin to your Gitea instance URL."

Step 2 — Dispatch

Confirm the number names a PR, not an issue, before writing to it.

Task Tool Reference
List PRs; read a PR's details, diff, changed files or CI status list_pull_requests, pull_request_read references/pull-requests.md
Create a PR — subject to the silent-drop Gotcha above pull_request_write references/pull-requests.md
Update, close, reopen or retarget a PR, sync it with its base, or add/remove reviewers pull_request_write references/pull-requests.md
Merge a PR, or judge whether it can merge pull_request_write method: "merge" references/merging.md
Read, create, submit, dismiss or delete a code review, or reply to and resolve a review comment thread pull_request_read, pull_request_review_write references/reviews.md

Read the reference for the row you land on before making the call. Each carries the parameter signatures, the per-method behaviour and the response-shape quirks the row cannot, and every write method has at least one parameter that behaves differently from its issue-side counterpart.

Step 3 — Resolving labels and milestones

labels and milestone take numeric IDs, never name or title strings. Before a pull_request_write call carrying either, resolve them through gitea-labels-milestones: label_read method: "list_repo_labels" for a label name, milestone_read method: "list" for a milestone title.

Resolve a milestone only when the call is an "update" — on "create" the lookup is wasted, per the Gotcha above. Recovering an existing PR's milestone ID needs the same lookup, because pull_request_read returns milestone as a bare title string and never an ID.