The #113 sweep rested on CLAUDE.md's premise that rtk either filters or passes through unchanged, so prefixing is always safe. Measured against rtk 0.42.4, that premise is false for several of the commands the sweep prefixed, and two skills were left giving wrong answers silently. Why: - `rtk git worktree list --porcelain -z` discards both flags and renders its own format. The `locked`/`lock_reason` fields git-worktrees Step 2 must emit are absent entirely, and paths under $HOME are abbreviated to `~/`. - `rtk git branch --list <name>` prints a phantom `* ` line even when nothing matches, so git-branches' stated ambiguity test — "output from both means the name is ambiguous" — reported every name as ambiguous. `tag --list` is a clean passthrough, so only one half broke. - `rtk git diff --name-only`/`--name-status` append a `Changes:` trailer to output documented as "one per line"; `--word-diff` emits none of the `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers its table describes; `rtk git log -L` truncates each line at ~72 chars, on the one command whose purpose is showing line content. - `rtk git stash pop` prints only `FAILED: git stash pop`, swallowing the conflict diagnostic and retained-entry message the surrounding prose tells the agent to rely on. Implementation notes: - Eleven sites reverted to bare `git`, each carrying its reason inline so the next sweep does not undo it. `mergetool` and `rebase -i` are reverted on clause 3's interactive limb only: the TTY defect does not reproduce — rtk filters exactly twelve subcommands and execs the rest — and ADR-0023 records that measurement rather than a convenient one. - ADR-0023 states the rule repo-wide with a third clause: a command whose output the skill parses, or which is interactive, stays bare. `plugins/git/README.md` is reduced to a pointer; its claim that gitea skills "contain no git/rtk mentions at all" was false, and its citation of `hard-rules.md` pointed at a file containing no occurrence of "rtk". - Eight gitea sites swept, all verified byte-identical passthroughs first. - `scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh` gates clause 1. Run against main's pre-sweep corpus it reports 99 findings including every gitea site, so it would have caught the drift #113 was filed about. Impact: the gate covers clause 1 only, in shell-tagged fences and the opening span of Run cells. Clause 2 is not gateable — "Run `git switch`" and "`git switch` refuses" are the same tokens — and prose bullets are invisible to it. Both limits are recorded in gates.md rather than left implied. Refs: #113 ADR: 0023 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EeH8SCbcrCAQrtymkNuhKP
gitea-prs
List, read, create, update, merge, and review Gitea pull requests.
What it does
This skill handles the pull request lifecycle within the Gitea integration suite — listing and reading PRs (details, diff, changed files, CI status, reviews), creating them (title, body, labels), updating them (title, body, assignees, labels, milestone), adding and removing reviewers, closing/reopening, merging with a chosen strategy and post-merge branch cleanup, and the full code-review flow (create a review with inline comments, submit it, dismiss or delete it, reply to a review comment, and resolve or unresolve a comment thread). It composes gitea-labels-milestones for label/milestone ID resolution rather than duplicating that logic — milestone applies on an update only, never on create — and defers to gitea-issues for anything that turns out to be an issue rather than a PR (they share one number space) and to gitea-branches/gitea-files for the underlying branch/file operations behind a PR.
Usage
/gitea-prs
Describe the PR or review task: list PRs, get a PR's status/diff/reviews, create or update a PR, merge one, or create/submit/dismiss a code review. The skill resolves owner/repo from the origin git remote (or takes them from an orchestrating caller) and resolves any label or milestone names via gitea-labels-milestones before writing them.
Before you start
Requires a Gitea MCP server configured with a token holding write:issue + write:repository.
Requires a git remote named origin pointing at the Gitea instance, unless an orchestrating caller
(e.g. gitea-workflow) already resolved owner/repo for you.
Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
SKILL.md |
Skill instructions for agents — Gotchas, the dispatch table, and label/milestone ID resolution via gitea-labels-milestones |
references/pull-requests.md |
Execution detail for list_pull_requests, pull_request_read (get/get_diff/get_files/get_status), and pull_request_write (create/update/close/reopen/update_branch/add_reviewers/remove_reviewers) |
references/reviews.md |
Execution detail for pull_request_review_write (create/submit/delete/dismiss, plus the comment-thread methods reply_comment/resolve_thread/unresolve_thread) and the review-related pull_request_read methods |
references/merging.md |
The merge workflow — CI vs. review/branch-protection gates, merge styles, branch cleanup, and the post-merge issue-close check |
references/sources.md |
Research sources backing the PR/review guidance |