Why The two audit skills carried 1,724 lines of byte-identical duplication: the ADR-0020 boundary resolver (1,061), vale-wrap.sh (526), the Vale style rules (44) and the Contributing-files parser (93). Nothing shared them — they were held in sync by a 413-line pre-push gate and its 797-line test suite. Sync-by-gate had already failed once: at484357athe two parser copies drifted into different spellings of the bullet loop while a docstring asserted they were identical. That drift was behaviour-neutral and was re-unified by hand at598a7c3, so the copies were identical at merge time — but nothing had caught it, and the next drift need not be neutral. Implementation Notes Self-containment binds BETWEEN skills, not within one. The agentskills.io spec forbids reaching across skill directories, which is why two separate skills needed embedded copies; two files inside ONE skill may source a third. That is the whole reason the merge removes duplication rather than relocating it. The union of both bodies measured 1,532 words against BODY_MAX_WORDS=900, and only 211 of those words were shared, so SKILL.md is a dispatch body. Step 0 resolves the flow from the target path before any validation, and its table mirrors validate.sh's detection exactly: a directory holding SKILL.md or a SKILL.md file (skill); a *.agent.md, or a .md directly under an agents/ directory (agent); anything else stops without running a validator. Steps 1-3 live in references/skill-flow.md and references/agent-flow.md, and gotchas that apply to one flow live in that flow's file, since it is loaded on every invocation anyway. If validate.sh reports on the other artifact type, the body restarts at Step 0. Named factory-audit rather than forge-audit because forge is a live skill, and a family prefix that matches a live sibling reads as ownership rather than membership. The description carries one arrow per boundary target, because ADR-0020 resolves only the first target after an arrow. It drops the quoted "audit this skill"-style phrases, which restated "audited" in a second register (ADR-0020's duplicate-register rule). 241 characters, Gotchas 16% of the body: no size SUGGESTIONs. The boundary resolver stays embedded in two files rather than imported: a cache-installed plugin cannot read outside its own directory, and the repo-root hook resolves via .pre-commit-hooks.yaml where entry[0] is the only token pre-commit rewrites, so no single file is reachable by both. tests/test-adr0020-contract.sh hashes both copies for byte-identity, and asserts validate.sh sources the resolver and that no third copy exists. The entry scripts classify the target from its resolved parent directory, so a bare agent filename typed inside agents/ works; resolve SCRIPT_DIR CDPATH-safely; and exit 2 when a lib-*.sh is missing, rather than dying with exit 1, the tier the flows relay as real findings. The provenance run functions stash their findings code in KYBERFORGE_PROV_RC and return 0, so validate-provenance.sh calls them UNTESTED. Testing a function's status (`f || RC=$?`) disables errexit for its entire body, and no subshell or `set -e` inside can re-arm it once the call sits in a condition context (measured, both spellings). Their error paths use `exit`, which is unaffected either way; this keeps errexit armed for anything added later. Case 0's readability guard reads the file instead of asking `[[ -r ]]`. `-r` is access(2), which answers yes for uid 0 even on a mode-000 file, and this repo's dev environment is root -- so the guard could never fire where it exists to fire. A read attempt is also the stricter question, catching EIO. This is the reasoning scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh carried before this commit deleted it; the hazard did not go with it. All three entry scripts are CDPATH-safe, vale-wrap.sh included: both of its cd sites are cleared, the --config resolution and the directory-mirror walk, where an exported CDPATH would otherwise print a decoy path into the -print0 stream and build the mirror from the decoy's files. The two remaining bare cd calls take absolute paths, which CDPATH is never consulted for. Impact BREAKING: skill-audit and agent-audit no longer exist as invocable skills. kyberforge goes to 2.0.0 (catalog 0.4.7). Check logic is unchanged: differential runs of the old and new validators across every skill and agent produced byte-identical stdout, stderr and exit codes, and the reconstructed Python payloads differ only in comments and the references/field-inventory.md -> agent-field-inventory.md rename. One doctrine governs the tiers: exit 0 is audited and clean, exit 1 is audited with findings OR a target present but unreadable, exit 2 is that nothing was audited at all. Edge paths DID change, deliberately (full table in ADR-0025): - a missing target exits 2 (never ran), not 1, under its own "does not exist" message; detection is by path shape, so a shape-matching path that is simply absent used to reach the validator and come back as a FAIL against a file that never existed; - an unshaped target exits 2 under the generic "matches neither" message, and a directory with no SKILL.md under a third, distinct one -- three exit-2 messages, not one; - a dangling symlink or a symlink loop stays exit 1: it is present but broken, which is a finding about the artifact rather than a usage error; - a SKILL.md file path is audited as its skill directory instead of refused; - a .md agent outside an agents/ directory is refused rather than audited; - a missing script library, a missing python3, a missing PyYAML, and no argument at all each exit 2. validate-provenance.sh already exited 2 for the last two; validate.sh now matches it. .pre-commit-hooks.yaml is a published contract consumed by external repos. Both hook IDs and both files: regexes are unchanged; only entry: and description: moved. scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh (413), scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh (21), tests/test-check-vale-style-sync.sh (797) and agent-audit/scripts/README.md (47) are deleted. The checker made 17 assertions: 6 compared the two Vale copies and are moot; 10 are rehomed into tests/test-vale-wrap.sh (case 0, cases 28-31, and the suite's Vale-absent skip); and the cross-manifest files: agreement check, which selected hooks by entry: and so could not survive both hooks sharing one, is ported as case 33 pairing hooks by id:. Cases 28, 30 and 33 carry mutation self-tests; narrowing the local skill prefilter to 6 of 38 SKILL.md files now fails the suite. Skills go 39 to 38. Pre-push goes 9 repo-authored hooks to 8. ADR: 0025 BREAKING-CHANGE: the skill-audit and agent-audit skills are removed. Both flows are served by factory-audit, which auto-detects whether it was handed a skill directory or an agent file. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
4.3 KiB
source_keys
| source_keys | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Description Quality Reference
Upstream source: agentskills.io — optimizing-descriptions, specification. House contract: the context budget. The house contract is narrower than the spec rather than a reinterpretation of it: where both speak, both must be satisfied.
Why the description is the expensive part
At startup an agent loads only the name and description of every installed skill. The body is
never seen until the skill triggers. The description therefore carries the entire triggering
burden and is paid for in every session, whether the skill fires or not.
A second cost is less obvious and is a correctness hazard rather than a token cost: a description that summarises the workflow is a shortcut the agent takes instead of reading the body. A measured failure upstream — a description saying "code review between tasks" — produced one review where the body's flowchart specified two.
Step 0 — establish which contract applies
Read the frontmatter before judging a single word.
disable-model-invocation: true— the skill is hand-invoked. Its description is never matched against user intent, so it is not a routing string. It carries one plain human-facing sentence stating what the skill does. Audit it for that and nothing else. Reporting a missing trigger clause, a missing boundary clause or absent indirect triggers on a hand-invoked skill is a wrong finding, not a strict one.- No such flag — the skill is model-invoked and the rest of this file applies.
The three-part shape
A model-invoked description carries exactly three things:
- Trigger clause. When to invoke, phrased imperatively:
Use when .... NotThis skill ...— the agent is deciding whether to act, not reading a catalogue entry. - At most one capability clause. What it does, in one clause. Never an enumeration.
- Boundary clause. Compressed form:
Not <thing> -> <skill-name>.The target must resolve to a real skill directory or agent file in the authoring source.validate.shchecks that deterministically and grades it by notation: an unresolved/nameor arrow target is an ERROR and reaches the report as a Structure FAIL, while an unresolved prose-form target ("useyinstead") is only a SUGGESTION unless a second target in the same sentence resolves. Take the script's tier as given and report it once, under Structure.
Everything else belongs in the body or in README.md.
Indirect triggers — conditional, never blanket
Add "even if the user doesn't say X" only where the user's natural phrasing genuinely omits the
domain word. True for the gitea-* family: people say "create an issue", not "create a Gitea
issue". False for git-commits: nobody asks for a commit without saying commit. A blanket
indirect-trigger clause on a skill whose domain word is unavoidable is padding charged to every
session.
Near-miss exclusions
Add a boundary clause only where a sibling skill could plausibly steal the activation. Use strong near-misses — queries that share keywords but need something different — not weak ones ("write a fibonacci function"). One boundary clause per genuine near-miss; a list of four is enumeration wearing a boundary's clothes.
Before / after
# FAIL — enumeration first, mechanics as the opener, a blanket indirect trigger,
# and 300+ characters of it preloaded into every session forever.
description: >
Analyze CSV and tabular data files — compute summary statistics, add derived
columns, generate charts, and clean messy data. Use when the user has a CSV,
TSV, or Excel file and wants to explore, transform, or visualize the data,
even if they don't explicitly mention "CSV" or "analysis."
# PASS — trigger, one capability clause, boundary. The four verbs the FAIL
# version enumerates are the body's job; the router cannot act on them.
description: >
Use when the user has a CSV, TSV, or Excel file and wants it explored,
transformed, or charted. Not schema design -> data-model.
(data-model is illustrative. In a real description the target has to resolve.)
The FAIL and SUGGESTION criteria for this dimension live in references/skill-finding-criteria.md,
which Step 3 loads on every run.