Why: PR #144 review round 4 reproduced hooks referencing $PLUGIN_ROOT or ${PLUGIN_ROOT} without a path separator passing the audit, although apm only rewrites ${TOKEN}/ and the deployed hook points nowhere. - FAIL unbraced or unseparated plugin-root tokens - check the exec bit for scripts run via an interpreter -c string - skip env NAME=value prefixes when locating bare relative paths - correct input: and empty-frontmatter messages, depth-walk applyTo braces - INFO on unrecognised targets; failing-case tests for untested checks - document tiers, blind spots and crash exit 2; drop rtk from portable flow - restore the after-a-hand-edit trigger; pin upstream apm source URL Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KkT7RSDwDbmrM9T34b6sTi
4.5 KiB
source_keys
| source_keys | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Instruction Flow
Steps 1 to 3 for an apm instruction — the target Step 0 matched as a *.instructions.md file.
Work them in order, then return to SKILL.md Step 4 to report.
Gotchas
apm compile --validateis not a gate. Every messageInstruction.validate()produces is a warning, and it reports success on a file with no description and an empty body — never cite it as evidence against a finding.descriptionnever reaches Claude, and it is index text elsewhere, never a routing description. Do not hold it to the skill description contract: no trigger clause, no boundary clause. A ValeKyberforge.DescriptionOpeneralert here means rewrite it as a plain statement of what the rule covers.
Step 1 — Deterministic checks
Resolve both paths against this skill's own directory. Run exactly:
bash scripts/validate.sh <instruction-file>
bash scripts/vale-wrap.sh <instruction-file>
validate.sh findings become the ### Structure dimension, FAILs and SUGGESTIONs both, at the tier the script assigned: path, a file that is not valid UTF-8, unfilled FILL IN or FILL_IN_ template placeholders, frontmatter, description, body, an applyTo that is neither a string nor a list, present but empty, or has unbalanced braces or brackets (a closer before its opener counts), a missing or list-form applyTo, extra keys, and a stem duplicated at the package root. It exits 0 with no FAIL, 1 on real findings, 2 when it never ran, including a crash inside the checks — report that as ### Structure unverified, quoting the stderr reason.
A missing applyTo is a SUGGESTION, not the FAIL primitive-author's instruction Must 4 implies: absence is legal after the author Gate's explicit yes, which the audit cannot see. The scope dimension's always-on FAILs below cover the misuse. Do not re-tier it by judgment.
vale-wrap.sh applies the bundled Kyberforge style. Every alert is a FAIL under ### Prose, cited by rule ID; do not re-derive it by judgment. That includes the rules scoped to the description (Kyberforge.DescriptionOpener, VagueWording, CompositionNote), a deliberate deviation from primitive-author, which holds description wording to at most a Should: the house prose rules apply to every model- or user-visible description, and a deterministic rule does not change tier by file kind. Do not re-tier them. 0 files scanned means NOT RUN, not clean — say so and judge prose by reading.
There is no provenance step: an instruction carries no source_keys.
Step 2 — Read the instruction and its context
Read the file, the package's apm.yml, and the repo's root AGENTS.md. For a scoped file, list the tracked files its applyTo matches (git ls-files filtered by the glob). List the instruction stems the installed dependencies ship (apm_modules/**/.apm/instructions/*.instructions.md) — the script checks only the package root for a duplicate.
Step 3 — Qualitative audit
Cite file and line for every finding.
scope — an instruction applies when files matching applyTo are touched; with no applyTo it loads into every session of every repo that installs the package.
- FAIL: the content is a rule for this repo alone, scoped or always-on — it belongs in
AGENTS.md(a nestedAGENTS.mdfor a subtree), which is the repo's own instruction source, not in a package that ships it to every consumer. This matchesprimitive-author's Gate, which routes every repo-only rule there. - FAIL: the stem matches an instruction an installed dependency ships — both deploy to
.claude/rules/<stem>.md, and one silently overwrites the other. - SUGGESTION: an
applyToglob that matches no tracked file here. It is legitimate for files the package's consumers have and this repo does not, so name the mismatch rather than failing it. - SUGGESTION: an always-on file whose content is really file-type specific — narrow it with
applyTo. - SUGGESTION: a glob much broader than the content (
**for a rule about Python).
description
- SUGGESTION: the description does not say what the rule covers, or contradicts the body. Any rationale Claude readers need belongs in the body, because Claude drops the description.
- SUGGESTION: a relative markdown link that does not resolve from the source file — apm rewrites links on deploy, and a broken one stays broken on every target.
Then return to SKILL.md Step 4, opening the report with this coverage line:
Checked: structure · prose · scope · description