Quote the template description so the raw scaffold is valid YAML, reject newline-containing names in new-instructions.sh, correct the empty-compile facts (exit 1, --clean exits 0), and finish removing commit steps from the skill-author, agent-author and forge references. Adds regression tests. Refs #148 Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KkT7RSDwDbmrM9T34b6sTi
1.9 KiB
source_keys
| source_keys | |
|---|---|
|
Bumping the package version after a route
Reached from SKILL.md Step 3 after a route has finished. A skill route always lands here:
skill-author moves only a skill's own metadata.version, which is not the package manifest's
number, so the package version is still behind when it reports done. agent-author and instructions-author bump the
resolved package's apm.yml themselves (agent-author at plugin/APM scope), and apm-workflow's configure flow
carries the same policy — read those routes' output before acting here, because a second bump for
one change is wrong.
Find the owning package
Walk up from the artifact's path to the nearest ancestor apm.yml that declares a top-level
type: field (instructions, skill, hybrid or prompts).
An apm.yml with no type: field is a marketplace-only manifest: it lists packages rather
than declaring one, so it does not count as a match. Skip it and keep walking up.
Skip this step entirely if no ancestor apm.yml carries a type: field: the artifact is then
standalone or scoped to a user agent directory, and there is no package to version.
Delegate the bump
Invoke apm-workflow as a clean-context subagent — fresh, not forked — with this
brief:
"The package at
<package-path>gained a new<artifact-type>(<artifact-name>). Bump theversionfield in that package'sapm.yml. Determine whether to bump minor (0.1.0) or patch (0.0.1) based on whether this is a new capability (minor) or a fix/refactor (patch). Do not release or tag — just updateapm.yml."
Clean context rather than a fork is the point: the bump decision is made independently, without anchoring on the authoring conversation that just argued for the artifact's significance.
Then report to the user: "Updated <package-name> version from <old> to <new> to reflect the
new <artifact-name>."