holocron/plugins/gitea/.apm/skills/gitea-labels-milestones/references/label-inference.md

topic, source_keys

topic	source_keys
label-inference	context7-websites-gitea gitea-mcp-repo

Label inference guide

Maps context-pattern signals from conversation content (an issue being drafted, a bug report, a PR description) to this repo's Kind/* / Priority/* / Status/* label taxonomy. Used by gitea-issues and gitea-prs before creating or updating an issue/PR, and directly when the user asks to label something without naming exact labels.

Exclusivity is per label — read it, never infer it

Gitea's exclusive flag is a real per-label boolean returned by list_repo_labels, and where it is true the server enforces one-label-per-scope itself. It is not an org-only setting, and the / delimiter in a name says nothing about it. Verified on Defame1297/holocron: every Priority/*, Reviewed/* and Status/* label is exclusive: true, while every Kind/* label — and Compat/Breaking — is exclusive: false and is used stacked.

So read each candidate label's own exclusive value from the resolution call and branch on it:

• exclusive: true — the server drops the sibling on write. Add the label and let it; do not pre-remove the label already there, and do not compute a replacement set client-side. Inferring Priority/High onto an issue carrying Priority/Medium needs no special handling.
• exclusive: false — add alongside, never replace. Stripping a co-existing label in the same scope destroys a valid one: an issue can legitimately carry Kind/Bug and Kind/Security at once.

There is no client-side exclusivity convention for this skill to enforce.

Signal → label mapping

Kind/* (what kind of work this is):

Signal in context	Label
Bug report, error, crash, unexpected behavior, "broken", "doesn't work"	Kind/Bug
New capability, "add support for", net-new functionality	Kind/Feature
Improvement to existing behavior, "make X better", refactor with behavior change	Kind/Enhancement
Docs-only change, README/comment/guide updates	Kind/Documentation
Vulnerability, credential exposure, injection risk, auth bypass	Kind/Security

Priority/* (urgency):

Signal in context	Label
"blocking", "critical", "urgent", production-down	Priority/Critical
"soon", "high priority", "should do this sprint"	Priority/High
No urgency signal present	Priority/Medium (default)

Status/* (workflow state):

Signal in context	Label
Explicit statement that the work is blocked on something else	Status/Blocked

Procedure

1. Read the conversation context (issue/PR title, body, or the triggering discussion) for the signals above.
2. Call label_read method: "list_repo_labels" (see references/labels.md) to get the current label set with IDs and each label's exclusive value — inference must never guess an ID, only a name, then resolve it. Both pools can apply to one issue, so for any inferred name absent from the repo pool, also call label_read method: "list_org_labels" with org set to the repo's owner before treating it as unresolved. Read that call's failure text: a required=[read:organization] scope error means the org pool was never queried — report the missing token scope rather than reporting the label unresolved. Only a not-found response means there is no org pool and the name is genuinely absent.
3. Match inferred label names against the resolved list (case-insensitive) and carry each match's exclusive value forward: true means the server replaces the sibling on write, false means the label is added alongside whatever is already applied (see above).
4. Low-confidence inference omits the label. If no signal confidently maps to a Kind/* value, do not guess — omit Kind/* entirely rather than default to one. Priority/Medium is the one exception: it's the explicit default when no urgency signal is present, not a guess.
5. Hand the resolved IDs, each with its exclusive value, to the caller's issue_write/ pull_request_write call — this skill does not apply labels to an issue or PR itself.