SKILL.md called `exclusive` "an org-labels-only flag" and concluded that applying a Kind/*, Priority/* or Status/* label "must replace the one already there, not stack on it". Live `list_repo_labels` on this repo returns `exclusive` on every REPO label: all seven Kind/* plus Compat/Breaking are false, while Priority/*, Reviewed/* and Status/* are true. So the field is not org-only, and the replace rule would strip a valid Kind/* label — a destructive write from a false premise. The nuance kept: label_write's `exclusive` parameter genuinely is annotated org-only, so that row was schema-accurate. The error was generalising a write-parameter restriction into a claim about where the field exists. The row is qualified rather than deleted. The rule is now per-label: where exclusive is true the server drops the sibling itself, so do not pre-remove; where it is false the label is legitimately stackable. Also fixes the org-label fallback, which treated any list_org_labels failure as proof the owner is a user account with no org pool and said so was "an answer, not an error to report". Under the token scopes this skill declares the call fails with required=[read:organization] before any org-vs-user determination is made, so a capability gap was being reported as an absent label. Scope errors are now distinguished and reported. Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls. Refs #99
4.1 KiB
topic, source_keys
| topic | source_keys | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| label-inference |
|
Label inference guide
Maps context-pattern signals from conversation content (an issue being drafted, a bug report, a PR
description) to this repo's Kind/* / Priority/* / Status/* label taxonomy. Used by
gitea-issues and gitea-prs before creating or updating an issue/PR, and directly when the user
asks to label something without naming exact labels.
Exclusivity is per label — read it, never infer it
Gitea's exclusive flag is a real per-label boolean returned by list_repo_labels, and where it is
true the server enforces one-label-per-scope itself. It is not an org-only setting, and the /
delimiter in a name says nothing about it. Verified on Defame1297/holocron: every Priority/*,
Reviewed/* and Status/* label is exclusive: true, while every Kind/* label — and
Compat/Breaking — is exclusive: false and is used stacked.
So read each candidate label's own exclusive value from the resolution call and branch on it:
exclusive: true— the server drops the sibling on write. Add the label and let it; do not pre-remove the label already there, and do not compute a replacement set client-side. InferringPriority/Highonto an issue carryingPriority/Mediumneeds no special handling.exclusive: false— add alongside, never replace. Stripping a co-existing label in the same scope destroys a valid one: an issue can legitimately carryKind/BugandKind/Securityat once.
There is no client-side exclusivity convention for this skill to enforce.
Signal → label mapping
Kind/* (what kind of work this is):
| Signal in context | Label |
|---|---|
| Bug report, error, crash, unexpected behavior, "broken", "doesn't work" | Kind/Bug |
| New capability, "add support for", net-new functionality | Kind/Feature |
| Improvement to existing behavior, "make X better", refactor with behavior change | Kind/Enhancement |
| Docs-only change, README/comment/guide updates | Kind/Documentation |
| Vulnerability, credential exposure, injection risk, auth bypass | Kind/Security |
Priority/* (urgency):
| Signal in context | Label |
|---|---|
| "blocking", "critical", "urgent", production-down | Priority/Critical |
| "soon", "high priority", "should do this sprint" | Priority/High |
| No urgency signal present | Priority/Medium (default) |
Status/* (workflow state):
| Signal in context | Label |
|---|---|
| Explicit statement that the work is blocked on something else | Status/Blocked |
Procedure
- Read the conversation context (issue/PR title, body, or the triggering discussion) for the signals above.
- Call
label_read method: "list_repo_labels"(seereferences/labels.md) to get the current label set with IDs and each label'sexclusivevalue — inference must never guess an ID, only a name, then resolve it. Both pools can apply to one issue, so for any inferred name absent from the repo pool, also calllabel_read method: "list_org_labels"withorgset to the repo'sownerbefore treating it as unresolved. Read that call's failure text: arequired=[read:organization]scope error means the org pool was never queried — report the missing token scope rather than reporting the label unresolved. Only a not-found response means there is no org pool and the name is genuinely absent. - Match inferred label names against the resolved list (case-insensitive) and carry each match's
exclusivevalue forward:truemeans the server replaces the sibling on write,falsemeans the label is added alongside whatever is already applied (see above). - Low-confidence inference omits the label. If no signal confidently maps to a
Kind/*value, do not guess — omitKind/*entirely rather than default to one.Priority/Mediumis the one exception: it's the explicit default when no urgency signal is present, not a guess. - Hand the resolved IDs, each with its
exclusivevalue, to the caller'sissue_write/pull_request_writecall — this skill does not apply labels to an issue or PR itself.