Adds the human-facing entry point and router for the Gitea integration, replacing the old flat /gitea skill per ADR 0011. It composes the six domain skills (gitea-issues, gitea-labels-milestones, gitea-prs, gitea-branches, gitea-files, gitea-releases) rather than calling any Gitea MCP tool directly, mirroring git-workflow's router shape. Preserves the old flat skill's default no-args status view (open issues + open PRs, two sections) and adds deterministic ambiguous issue-vs-PR number resolution via issue_read's is_pull field, since issues and PRs share one number space in Gitea. Authored via kyberforge:forge -> skill-author, with an independent clean-context skill-audit re-run confirming no findings. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FNJWdVvdgvZCHi1hZGqgVQ
5.0 KiB
name, description, compatibility, metadata
| name | description | compatibility | metadata | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gitea-workflow | Use when a human wants a general or ambiguous Gitea status check or isn't sure which Gitea domain skill applies — a no-args check-in ("what's going on in the repo", "any updates?"), a bare-numbered reference that could be an issue or a PR ("what's the status of #42", "what's happening with #17"), or a request to discover which Gitea capability handles a task. This is the human-facing entry point and router for the Gitea integration — it replaces the old flat `/gitea` invocation (now `/gitea-workflow`) and composes the six domain skills (`gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs`, `gitea-branches`, `gitea-files`, `gitea-releases`) rather than calling any Gitea MCP tool directly. Do not use this skill when the domain is already known and unambiguous — invoke the matching domain skill directly instead (e.g. "create an issue" → `gitea-issues`, "merge PR #10" → `gitea-prs`, "cut a release" → `gitea-releases`). Do not use for local git operations with no Gitea component (use `git-workflow`). | Requires Gitea MCP server configured with a token; delegates all calls to the six domain skills, which in turn require write:issue and write:repository scopes at minimum. |
|
Gotchas
- This skill never calls a Gitea MCP tool itself. Every read or write goes through one of the six domain skills. If a request needs a raw
mcp__gitea__*call that no domain skill exposes, that's a gap in a domain skill, not something to patch here. - Issues and PRs share one number space — a bare number like
#42could be either. Never guess from context clues alone; resolve it with a real call (see Step 2) before dispatching. - A 404 on the resolution call doesn't necessarily mean the number doesn't exist. Gitea hides permission errors as not-found (documented in
gitea-issues' Gotchas). If resolution 404s unexpectedly, say so and suggest checking token scope rather than reporting "no such issue or PR."
Step 1 — Default status view (no args)
When invoked with no specific request, give a status check-in:
- Invoke
gitea-issuesto list open issues (state: "open"). - Invoke
gitea-prsto list open PRs (state: "open"). - Run both in parallel — they're independent reads.
- Report as two sections, "Open Issues" and "Open Pull Requests", each as a compact list (number, title). This preserves the original flat
/giteaskill's default behavior.
Step 2 — Resolve an ambiguous number
When the user references a bare number without saying "issue" or "PR" (e.g. "what's going on with #42"):
- Invoke
gitea-issuesto runissue_read method: "get"on that number. - Check the response's
is_pullfield:true→ it's a PR. Invokegitea-prsfor full PR detail (status, diff, reviews as appropriate to the request) and present that instead.falseor absent → it's an issue. Present the issue detail already retrieved.
- If the resolution call 404s, don't conclude the number doesn't exist — report the 404 and suggest verifying token scope (
write:issue) pergitea-issues' Gotchas, since permission errors are hidden as not-found in Gitea.
Never dispatch to gitea-issues or gitea-prs based on guessing from phrasing alone ("that sounds like a bug" is not evidence) — always resolve first.
Step 3 — Route explicit but domain-unclear requests
For requests that name a capability but not obviously which skill owns it, use this index:
| Skill | Covers |
|---|---|
gitea-issues |
List/read/create/update issues, comments, search across issues and PRs. Composes gitea-labels-milestones for label/milestone resolution. |
gitea-labels-milestones |
Label and milestone CRUD, label inference from conversation context, resolving names/titles to the numeric IDs writes require. Cross-cutting — used by both gitea-issues and gitea-prs. |
gitea-prs |
List/read/create/update/merge PRs, code reviews. Composes gitea-labels-milestones the same way gitea-issues does. |
gitea-branches |
Branch list/create/delete, plus commit history (list commits, get a single commit by SHA). |
gitea-files |
Read/write/delete individual files, list a directory, walk the full repo tree. |
gitea-releases |
Release and tag CRUD — draft/prerelease flags, release notes, semver tags. |
If a request clearly names one of these (e.g. "create a milestone" → gitea-labels-milestones, "read this file from the repo" → gitea-files), invoke that skill directly rather than routing through here. Use this table only when the user or an upstream agent is unsure which skill applies.
Step 4 — Report
Present results in plain language. For the status view, two labeled sections. For a resolved ambiguous number, say which domain it turned out to be before showing detail ("That's a pull request:" / "That's an issue:"). For routing, name the skill and hand off — don't duplicate its output format, let it report.