Follow-up to the review of #106, which found four parameter claims the
first pass left wrong or missing. All four verified against gitea-mcp
v1.6.0 source before changing anything.
`remove_deadline` is dropped on "create" like the others, but the new
Gotcha enumerated a closed list that omitted it — so the paragraph
contradicted its own opening sentence. The list is now open ("including")
and the parameter carries the same "update" only marker as its neighbours.
`base` is settable on "update": editPullRequestFn reads it and retargets
the PR onto a different base branch. The file documented it as required
for "create" and said nothing else, hiding a real capability. This one is
under-claiming rather than over-claiming, but a file whose subject is
which parameter applies to which method is the place to fix it.
applyDraftPrefix strips two prefixes, `WIP:` and `[WIP]`, matched with
strings.EqualFold, while only "WIP: " is ever added. The un-draft
correction said "the prefix" singular, which understates what a caller
can hand it.
README.md bundled `reviewers` and `milestone` into "creating and
updating". Capability prose rather than a parameter contract, so not
strictly false, but it is the same conflation that produced the original
bug and it is not behind any gate.
Not addressed here: SKILL.md's description still advertises updating
reviewers, its draft guidance still prescribes the manual workaround, and
its milestone-resolution instruction carries no method qualifier — so an
agent working from SKILL.md alone can still reach the failure mode. Those
edits trip skill-size-check and the Vale prefilter, pulling in the
ADR-0020 retrofit; tracked on #99 rather than done silently here.
Refs: #104
Refs: #99
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ETxbGFetkbJQBHsx442Brt
Defame1297
967d3ade25