Why: two blind verifiers re-ran the five preceding commits and found four
defects of the same class this branch exists to close -- a confidently stated
measured claim that does not survive re-measurement -- this time inside the
fixes themselves.
- AGENTS.md:41 still carried both phrasings c68e864 reports having corrected.
`grep -rn repo-defined` returned exactly one hit repo-wide: that line, in the
file every session preloads. 4d336bb edited the line directly above it.
- ADR-0021 asserted twice, in the section justifying that no gate is added,
that the ADR-0020 validators "never open an apm.yml". All three open and
yaml.safe_load it (skill-size-check.sh:342, both validate.sh). The conclusion
survives -- none reads the description: key, and their globs are SKILL.md and
*.agent.md only -- but the stated mechanism is falsified by one grep.
- architecture.md said the ADR directory holds 20 numbered ADRs; c7ba3d2 made
it 21, and c68e864 audited that file for exactly this class of stale count.
The number is dropped rather than corrected: `ls docs/adr/` is already the
index, so a count in prose is a second thing to maintain.
- gates.md's new three-verdict table said `-> name` promotes an unresolved
target to ERROR. Reproduced with fixtures: NAME_HYPH (skill-size-check.sh:543)
requires a hyphen, so `-> gitea-prs` is checked and `-> triage` is not
extracted at all, and the unicode arrow is never recognised. The SUGGESTION
text advises that spelling, so taking its advice can silence the finding. The
gap is now documented as a defect; nothing covers it, since the one arrow case
in test-adr0020-targets.sh happens to use a hyphenated target.
Implementation notes:
- AGENTS.md:48's coverage claim is shrunk rather than chased. Restoring six
glossary entries did not make it true: 12 more sampled terms are undefined,
three of them (trigger/capability/boundary clause) used inside CONTEXT.md
itself. It now says CONTEXT.md is the glossary and is not exhaustive.
- CONTEXT.md's output profile and near-miss entries are corrected against their
sources. The first stated a false exclusion -- .github/plugin/plugin.json IS
apm-generated; only the marketplace mirror has no profile. The second
inverted its source's referent: description-quality.md defines a near-miss as
a query, not a sibling skill.
- The strict-mode message named jq, which no suite guards on (`command -v jq`
appears nowhere in tests/), while omitting python3/PyYAML, which three do.
- README's git and gitea bullets now name git-workflow and gitea-workflow.
ADR-0021 leaves README the only inventory and architecture.md now points at
it, so the two bullets that were short had to be completed.
- ADR-0018's 2026-08-14 correction is marked superseded in place. It asserted
machine state in the present tense that its own 2026-08-17 note retracts.
- ADR-0021's remaining errors: six files -> four (measured from de84d1b), the
wiki description's length 114 -> 96 chars, the codex self-contradiction, the
cost argument overstating bumps already owed for any skill addition, and two
claims about files this branch went on to edit.
- The "15 of 17 suites" figure is restored where I had removed it: it is a dated
record of one incident, not a live count, and four sites now describe it the
same way.
Impact: 16/16 pre-push hooks pass, suite 24 passed 0 skipped 0 failed. No
behaviour change; every edit is prose or a comment.
Refs: #105
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TmFqzpuExLJv3m114XVE9w
Defame1297
d42f6368fe