Why: AGENTS.md's Structure bullet restated apm-install mechanics already owned by docs/spec/architecture.md:24 and README.md:55, and docs/VISION.md carried stack, framework and deployment choices for a product that lives in a separate repo. Implementation notes: AGENTS.md keeps two actionable one-liners plus pointers to the README layout table and architecture.md, preserving the session rule that .claude/skills/ and .claude/agents/ are install output and must not be edited. VISION.md's Phase 1 Architecture block becomes a one-line scope statement; the "Mobile/desktop (Phase 3)" line is dropped as an intra-file duplicate of the Phase 3 section. Impact: no behaviour change. README.md and docs/spec/architecture.md are untouched -- the finding's premise was inflated, and architecture.md had already been differentiated in a way it documents in the file itself. Refs: SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md finding 32 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
5.0 KiB
Working in this repo
The global AI development configuration repository — the authoritative source for agent definitions, skills, workflows, and prompts across all projects.
This file carries only what applies to every session. Setup, prerequisites, and test commands are in README.md; the reasoning behind each enforcement gate is in docs/spec/gates.md.
Structure
plugins/<name>/.apm/is the only authoring source for plugin content..claude/skills/and.claude/agents/are gitignoredapm installoutput — never edit them.providers/claude-code/is the Claude Code adapter, deployed to~/.claude/byscripts/install.sh.
Repo layout table: README.md. Deployment mechanics and plugin boundaries: docs/spec/architecture.md.
Prefer plugin skills over raw shell
This repo dogfoods its own plugins. Before shelling out, check whether a skill already owns the operation — it usually does:
- Commits, branches, history, worktrees, remotes →
git-commits,git-branches,git-history,git-worktrees,git-remotes - Pre-commit hook install/config/troubleshooting →
pc-run/pc-author - Issues, PRs, labels, milestones →
gitea-issues,gitea-prs,gitea-labels-milestones; alsogitea-branches,gitea-files,gitea-releases, orgitea-workflowwhen the domain is ambiguous - Vale prose linting →
vale-config/vale-run - This repo's own AGENTS.md →
agentsmd-author/agentsmd-audit
Use the bare, unnamespaced names. That is what apm install deploys and the only form this repo's own install produces — a project skill has no plugin to prefix (ADR-0018). Whether the <plugin>: form (gitea:gitea-prs) also resolves depends on native plugin installs at user scope, outside this repo; write the bare name either way.
Fall back to raw shell only when no skill covers it.
Session rules
- Do not add repo-owned keys to
.claude/settings.json. apm treats it as its own deployed artifact andapm audit --cireplays the install and diffs, so anything apm would not have written is permanent drift that fails theapm-audit-cipre-push hook. A hook you want here is authored inplugins/<name>/.apm/hooks/and deployed by apm, never hand-written into that file. TheSessionStartentry already in it is exactly that: kyberforge authors it inplugins/kyberforge/.apm/hooks/hooks.jsonand apm merges it in, so it is apm's own output, it is what the replay expects, and it belongs in the commit — do not strip it (ADR-0019). Machine-specific settings go in the gitignored.claude/settings.local.json; shared enforcement goes in.pre-commit-config.yaml. apm.lock.yamlturning up modified is expected, not a bug. kyberforge'sSessionStarthook keeps the install current on launch and rewrites the lock in the process (ADR-0019). Commit or discard it deliberately.- A
.apm/edit is not live in this session until it is pushed. The six dependencies resolve from the holocron remote, unpinned against the default branch.apm installdeploys from the lock;apm updateis what re-resolves refs. - No pre-push hook needs the network. Root
apm.yml's marketplace has no remote package entries, so every hook resolves locally. - This repo and Gitea are the only source of truth. All project state, decisions, and working conventions live here. Do not use an external memory system for this project — cached state diverges from the repo and you get a split brain. Before answering any design or architecture question, check
docs/adr/for an existing decision.
Key documents
Read CONTEXT.md at the start of every session — it is this repo's domain glossary, and the terms it defines are used unglossed everywhere else. It is not exhaustive: terms it does not carry are defined at their point of use, mostly in docs/spec/.
Read these on demand:
README.md— prerequisites, install, and test commandsdocs/VISION.md— the phased roadmap and where this is going; read when a decision turns on product directionLESSONS.md— patterns that went wrong once; read before repeating a class of change that has burned the repo beforedocs/spec/gates.md— what each pre-commit and pre-push hook enforces and why; read when a gate fails or before changing hook configdocs/spec/architecture.md— directory structure, install pipeline, provider modeldocs/adr/— architectural decisions; read before answering design questions or proposing structural changesdocs/ai-constitution.md— full governance evidence base; read when a governance decision needs justificationdocs/research/ai-coding-factory/ai-coding-factory-principles.md— factory design rationale; read when implementing, auditing, or reviewing skills or factory structuredocs/notes/factory-integration-decisions.md— decisions from the factory integration grill; read when making skill authoring or factory design decisions- Governance rules are always in effect —
core/instructions/governance.md(agent rules);docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md