Files
holocron/plugins/gitea/skills/gitea-labels-milestones/references/label-inference.md
Defame1297 38f1ba4e03 fix(kyberforge): bridge apm content to Claude Code's flat plugin discovery
Claude Code's (and Copilot's) native plugin installer has zero awareness of
.apm/ nesting -- it convention-scans only flat skills/, agents/, commands/,
hooks.json at each plugin's root. Confirmed via strings on the installed
claude binary and live installs of git@holocron/gitea@holocron/kyberforge@
holocron, all reporting Skills(0) Agents(0) Hooks(0) post ADR-0015's apm
conversion. Root cause (apm_cli/core/plugin_manifest.py): apm's plugin.json
compiler deliberately strips skills/agents/commands keys, assuming the host
already auto-discovers those convention directories -- it has no model of
.apm/ being host-visible at all. Separately, apm's own bundle exporter
(apm_cli/bundle/plugin_exporter.py, behind `apm pack --format plugin`)
implements the correct .apm/ -> flat mapping, but only ever targeted
build/<name>-<version>/, a path nothing in marketplace.json's source: points
at.

scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh wraps that bundle exporter and copies its
agents/, skills/, commands/, instructions/, extensions/, and merged
hooks.json back into each plugin's own root as a second tracked
compiled-output category -- same governance status as
.claude-plugin/plugin.json: generated from .apm/, never hand-edited. tests/
subdirectories are excluded from the mirror (dev fixtures, not host-visible
runtime content; several hardcode a relative repo-root walk-up sized for the
.apm/-nested depth, which breaks when duplicated one level shallower).
Applied for real across all 6 plugins and verified two ways: `claude plugin
validate --strict` passes on every real plugin directory, and a live
`claude --plugin-dir <path> -p "list skills/agents"` behavioral test
confirms content is now actually discovered.

Also, from the same issue #90 review round:
- scripts/check-manifests.sh pointed at each plugin's root-level plugin.json
  (checking skills/hooks/mcpServers/agents pointer fields) -- that file was a
  stale near-duplicate of .claude-plugin/plugin.json nothing else read or
  wrote, now deleted across all 6 plugins. check-manifests.sh is rewritten to
  validate .claude-plugin/plugin.json instead, and drops the pointer-field
  checks entirely (nothing to check -- those fields are correctly absent by
  design). Content-presence drift is now check-plugin-content-sync's job, a
  new pre-push hook wired in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

docs/adr/0017 records the root cause and decision in full, including two
rejected alternatives (patching plugin.json's path fields directly -- apm's
compiler strips them on every run; pointing marketplace.json at apm pack's
build/ output -- a version-suffixed non-source directory nothing can install
from without an extra build step). ADR-0015 and CONTEXT.md are updated to
point at it.

Refs: #90
2026-08-13 16:59:03 +00:00

3.4 KiB

topic, source_keys
topic source_keys
label-inference
context7-websites-gitea
gitea-mcp-repo

Label inference guide

Maps context-pattern signals from conversation content (an issue being drafted, a bug report, a PR description) to this repo's Kind/* / Priority/* / Status/* label taxonomy. Used by gitea-issues and gitea-prs before creating or updating an issue/PR, and directly when the user asks to label something without naming exact labels.

Scoped labels are mutually exclusive — replace, don't stack

Each of Kind/*, Priority/*, Status/* is treated as a scoped-label group by convention (the / delimiter naming pattern). Gitea's exclusive flag — the mechanism that would let the server itself enforce one-label-per-scope — is documented as an org-labels-only setting, and the repo-level label_write methods used here don't accept it at all. So exclusivity within these scopes is a convention this skill enforces client-side, not something the server guarantees: applying a new label within a scope is expected to replace any existing label in that same scope on the target issue/PR, not add alongside it. When inference selects a Priority/High label and the issue already carries Priority/Medium, the write should result in only Priority/High remaining — use replace_labels scoped to that group's labels, or at minimum remove the superseded label before adding the new one. Never leave two labels from the same scope applied at once.

Signal → label mapping

Kind/* (what kind of work this is):

Signal in context Label
Bug report, error, crash, unexpected behavior, "broken", "doesn't work" Kind/Bug
New capability, "add support for", net-new functionality Kind/Feature
Improvement to existing behavior, "make X better", refactor with behavior change Kind/Enhancement
Docs-only change, README/comment/guide updates Kind/Documentation
Vulnerability, credential exposure, injection risk, auth bypass Kind/Security

Priority/* (urgency):

Signal in context Label
"blocking", "critical", "urgent", production-down Priority/Critical
"soon", "high priority", "should do this sprint" Priority/High
No urgency signal present Priority/Medium (default)

Status/* (workflow state):

Signal in context Label
Explicit statement that the work is blocked on something else Status/Blocked

Procedure

  1. Read the conversation context (issue/PR title, body, or the triggering discussion) for the signals above.
  2. Call label_read method: "list_repo_labels" (see references/labels.md) to get the current label set with IDs — inference must never guess an ID, only a name, then resolve it.
  3. Match inferred label names against the resolved list (case-insensitive). If a scope group already has a different label applied on the target and a new one is inferred for that same scope, plan to replace rather than add (see above).
  4. Low-confidence inference omits the label. If no signal confidently maps to a Kind/* value, do not guess — omit Kind/* entirely rather than default to one. Priority/Medium is the one exception: it's the explicit default when no urgency signal is present, not a guess.
  5. Hand the resolved IDs (plus which scopes to replace) to the caller's issue_write/ pull_request_write call — this skill does not apply labels to an issue or PR itself.