feat(kyberforge): execute plugin-to-apm marketplace conversion
Why: ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills. Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88 (apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing). Implementation notes: - All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field, no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory, permissionMode). - Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package, matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice. - .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs. url, Unicode escaping). - plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0 for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped 0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated script (apm has no native version-bump automation). - Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml, scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh, scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures -- including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path isolation regression introduced mid-fix. - Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments. - Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive. Impact: plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on -- editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats, 13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean. Fixes: #90 Refs: #88, #89 ADR: 0015 ADR: 0016 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: agentsmd-author
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Use when the user wants to create or update a repo's AGENTS.md file
|
||||
("write an AGENTS.md for this repo", "add setup/test instructions for
|
||||
agents", "update AGENTS.md", "give this package its own AGENTS.md") — even
|
||||
if they don't name the file explicitly, e.g. "document this for AI coding
|
||||
tools" or "make sure agents know how to run tests here". Writes/updates
|
||||
AGENTS.md by exploring the target repo for real build, test, lint, and
|
||||
style conventions — never invents commands. Supports nested monorepo
|
||||
placement (a subdirectory can get its own AGENTS.md following
|
||||
nearest-file-wins precedence). Closes every run by invoking agentsmd-audit
|
||||
inline, and calls provider-adapter-author when an existing provider file
|
||||
(CLAUDE.md, etc.) now duplicates what AGENTS.md owns. Do not use to review
|
||||
an existing AGENTS.md without changing it — use agentsmd-audit instead. Do
|
||||
not use to convert CLAUDE.md/.cursor/rules into a thin adapter — use
|
||||
provider-adapter-author instead.
|
||||
allowed-tools: Bash Read Write Edit
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
category: docs
|
||||
source_keys:
|
||||
- agents-md-official
|
||||
- context7-websites-agents-md
|
||||
- context7-agentsmd-agents-md
|
||||
version: "0.1.1"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Gotchas
|
||||
|
||||
- Never invent a command. Every line under a setup/test/build section must come from something you actually found in the repo (`package.json` scripts, a `Makefile` target, a CI workflow step, a README). If you can't verify a command, don't include it.
|
||||
- AGENTS.md has no required schema — don't force every common-sections-checklist heading into every repo. Include only sections that reflect something real about this repo; a thin, accurate file beats a padded, generic one.
|
||||
- Nested placement is for genuinely different conventions, not convenience. Only create a subdirectory AGENTS.md when that subtree has its own build tool, stack, or conventions distinct from the root — otherwise you're duplicating content the root already covers, which the nearest-file-wins rule doesn't merge back together.
|
||||
- This skill never touches CLAUDE.md, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`, or similar provider files directly — that's `provider-adapter-author`'s job. Detect and hand off; don't reconcile it yourself.
|
||||
- This skill never audits on its own judgment — the closing `agentsmd-audit` invocation is mandatory, not optional, even when the change looks trivial.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 1 — Explore the target repo
|
||||
|
||||
Before writing anything, gather real facts: package manager and scripts (`package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `Cargo.toml`, etc.), a `Makefile` or task runner, CI config (`.github/workflows/`, etc.) for the commands it actually runs, linter/formatter config files, and any existing docs (`README.md`, existing `AGENTS.md`) describing conventions. Note whether any subdirectory looks like its own package with a different stack.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 2 — Decide placement
|
||||
|
||||
- No `AGENTS.md` at the repo root yet → create one there first, covering whole-repo conventions.
|
||||
- A subdirectory has materially different build/test tooling or conventions than the root → create or update a nested `AGENTS.md` there, scoped to what's different. Don't repeat root-level content — the nearest-file-wins rule means the nested file is read alone, not merged with the root.
|
||||
- Otherwise → update the existing file(s) in place.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 3 — Write or update
|
||||
|
||||
Use only sections that reflect something real about the repo — never fill in every common-sections-checklist heading just because it exists. Read `references/content-guide.md` for section-by-section guidance, a worked example, and what separates useful content from generic padding, before writing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 4 — Check for an existing provider file
|
||||
|
||||
Look for `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, or similar in the target repo. If one exists and now duplicates content the AGENTS.md you just wrote/updated already owns, invoke the `provider-adapter-author` skill on it to reconcile — don't rewrite it yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 5 — Audit and report
|
||||
|
||||
Invoke the `agentsmd-audit` skill directly on the AGENTS.md file(s) you just wrote or updated. Resolve any FAIL findings before considering the work done — re-invoke this skill's own writing steps to fix them, then re-run the audit, same as any other close-the-loop check. Report what was created/changed, whether a provider file was reconciled, and the audit's final result.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user