feat(kyberforge): execute plugin-to-apm marketplace conversion

Why:
ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace
this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those
files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by
hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills.
Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88
(apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing).

Implementation notes:
- All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry
  apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills
  moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents
  were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md
  compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents
  now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field,
  no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory,
  permissionMode).
- Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus
  mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package,
  matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice.
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now
  apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained
  content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only
  cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs.
  url, Unicode escaping).
- plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based
  authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0
  for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped
  0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now
  documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated
  script (apm has no native version-bump automation).
- Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across
  .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml,
  scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh,
  scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json
  (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh
  validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures --
  including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one
  extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path
  isolation regression introduced mid-fix.
- Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in
  apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace
  package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote
  shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's
  marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side
  AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and
  hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin
  init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional
  name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot
  marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the
  compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no
  dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the
  correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments.
- Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to
  copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob
  stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive.

Impact:
plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on --
editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and
run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries
reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and
ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope
unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin
validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace
check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats,
13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean.

Fixes: #90
Refs: #88, #89
ADR: 0015
ADR: 0016

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-12 18:09:37 +00:00
parent 50d5c30a3c
commit 5e232503c4
289 changed files with 741 additions and 1974 deletions

View File

@@ -1,81 +0,0 @@
---
topic: branches
source_keys:
- gitea-mcp-repo
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
---
# Branch operations
Call signatures below were verified live against the deployed `gitea-mcp` server via `ToolSearch`
at authoring time, not copied from research docs — this is deliberate: research docs are generated
from source code at a point in time and can drift from the server actually deployed. Re-verify
against the live schema if these tools appear to behave differently than documented here.
## `list_branches`
**Parameters:**
- `owner` (string, required)
- `repo` (string, required)
- `page` (number, optional, default: `1`)
- `per_page` (number, optional, default: `30`)
**Call:**
```
list_branches owner: <owner> repo: <repo>
```
**Response:** one object per branch: `name`, `protected` (bool), `commit_sha` (present when the
underlying commit data is available).
Paginate if you need the full list (see Gotchas in SKILL.md) — iterate `page` until the returned
count is less than `per_page`.
## `create_branch`
**Parameters:**
- `owner` (string, required)
- `repo` (string, required)
- `branch` (string, required) — new branch name
- `old_branch` (string, optional) — source branch; if omitted, defaults to the repo's default
branch server-side (not necessarily your current local checkout)
**Call:**
```
create_branch owner: <owner> repo: <repo> branch: <new-name> old_branch: <source-branch>
```
Default dispatch: if the user gives a base ("branch off of X", "from X"), pass it as `old_branch`.
If they don't specify a base and you're mid-task on a local branch, pass your current branch
(`git branch --show-current`) as `old_branch` so the new branch forks from where you're actually
working, rather than silently falling back to the repo default. If neither applies (e.g. a fresh
top-level request with no working branch context), omit `old_branch` and let it default server-side.
A branch name collision returns `409 Conflict`.
## `delete_branch`
**Parameters:**
- `owner` (string, required)
- `repo` (string, required)
- `branch` (string, required)
**Call:**
```
delete_branch owner: <owner> repo: <repo> branch: <name>
```
Before calling this, see the hard-refusal Gotcha in SKILL.md. If the target branch's name isn't
obviously a scratch/feature branch, call `list_branches` first and check `protected` on the
matching entry — name-matching `main`/`master` alone isn't authoritative, since a repo can protect
a differently-named default branch. Confirm explicitly with the user before deleting anything
protected, every time, regardless of how the request is phrased.
## Token scope
All three — `list_branches`, `create_branch`, `delete_branch` — require `write:repository`. Gitea
gates reads behind write scope for repo-scoped operations, so `list_branches` needs the same scope
as the write operations, not `write:issue` alone. An earlier version of this doc claimed
`write:issue` alone was sufficient for `list_branches`, based on empirical testing under a token
that held both `write:issue` and `write:repository` simultaneously — that test didn't isolate the
variable, so it couldn't actually establish `write:issue` alone as sufficient.

View File

@@ -1,73 +0,0 @@
---
topic: commits
source_keys:
- gitea-mcp-repo
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
---
# Commit operations
Read-only commit history, scoped to a repo (optionally to one branch or one path). Call signatures
below were verified live against the deployed `gitea-mcp` server via `ToolSearch` at authoring time,
not copied from research docs, for the same drift-avoidance reason noted in `references/branches.md`.
This domain has no prior skill precedent — it's new coverage added alongside branches because commit
history is naturally scoped to a branch (a "what happened on this branch" question), not because it
shares any tool family with branch create/delete.
## `list_commits`
**Parameters:**
- `owner` (string, required)
- `repo` (string, required)
- `sha` (string, optional) — starting SHA or branch name; if omitted, gitea-mcp uses the repo's
default branch
- `path` (string, optional) — restrict results to commits that touched this file/path
- `page` (number, optional, default: `1`, minimum: `1`)
- `per_page` (number, optional, default: `30`, minimum: `1`)
**Call:**
```
list_commits owner: <owner> repo: <repo> sha: <branch-or-sha> path: <optional-path>
```
Dispatch defaults:
- "commits on `<branch>`" → pass `<branch>` as `sha`.
- "commits touching `<path>`" (no branch mentioned) → pass `path` alone, `sha` omitted (defaults to
the repo's default branch).
- Both given → pass both; the result is history for that path, walked from that branch/SHA.
- Neither given → omit both; this returns default-branch history, which is a reasonable default for
an open-ended "what's the recent history here" question.
**Response:** one object per commit: `sha`, `html_url`, `created`, `message` (when available),
`author` (`{name, email, date}`, when available).
Paginate per the manual-pagination Gotcha in SKILL.md if you need more than one page of history.
## `get_commit`
**Parameters:**
- `owner` (string, required)
- `repo` (string, required)
- `sha` (string, required)
**Call:**
```
get_commit owner: <owner> repo: <repo> sha: <commit-sha>
```
**Response:** same shape as a `list_commits` entry, but always fully populated (`message` and
`author` are guaranteed present, not conditional). Use this when the user asks about one specific
commit by SHA rather than browsing history — `list_commits` entries may omit `message`/`author` in
edge cases, `get_commit` will not.
## Token scope
Both tools are believed to require `write:repository`, even though they're read-only — inferred by
analogy with the scope-gating principle in `overview.md` (Gitea gates reads behind write scope for
repo-scoped operations), not a claim `overview.md` makes for commits by name: its explicit
`write:repository` enumeration lists PR, branch, file, release, and tag operations, but doesn't
mention commits. An earlier version of this doc claimed `write:issue` alone worked, based on
empirical testing under a token that held both `write:issue` and `write:repository`
simultaneously — that test didn't isolate the variable either. Treat this as unverified until
tested under a token scoped to `write:issue` only (no `write:repository`).

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Sources
**Note on call signatures:** per `docs/adr/0011-gitea-skill-deep-modules.md`, the tool parameter
signatures in `references/branches.md` and `references/commits.md` were re-verified live via
`ToolSearch` against the deployed `gitea-mcp` server at authoring time — they are not copied
verbatim from `api-reference.md` below. This resolves issue #6 comment #849's root-cause finding
that a prior skill was authored from API docs that had drifted from the actual MCP tool schema.
The research docs cited here informed gotchas, response shapes, and workflow context, not the
parameter lists themselves.
## gitea-mcp-repo
- **URL:** https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-mcp
- **Description:** Official gitea-mcp repository (v1.3.0); operation/*.go source files documenting all 55 MCP tools, their parameters, and CLI flags. Informed the dispatch table and pagination / 404-may-mean-403 gotchas in SKILL.md, and the list/create/delete branch and list/get commit mechanics (including 409 conflict and default-branch fallback behavior) in references/branches.md and references/commits.md.
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md, references/branches.md, references/commits.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## gitea-mcp-slim-go
- **URL:** https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-mcp/raw/branch/main/operation/repo/slim.go
- **Description:** Slim response shape structs from gitea-mcp source; defines exactly which fields the MCP server returns for branches (name, protected, commit_sha) and commits (sha, html_url, created, message, author), and informed get_commit's always-populated guarantee vs. list_commits' conditional fields.
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
- **Contributing files:** references/branches.md, references/commits.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## context7-websites-gitea
- **URL:** context7:/websites/gitea
- **Description:** Official Gitea docs mirror on Context7 — informed the protected-branch gotcha in SKILL.md (protected branches can block server-side operations regardless of client-side checks; admins aren't exempt by default).
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## context7-gitea-tea-cli
- **URL:** context7:/git_gitea_com/gitea_tea
- **Description:** Official `tea` CLI docs on Context7 — practitioner conventions for issues, PRs, and releases (semver tags, draft/prerelease flags). Consulted as part of the shared research pass but its content is scoped to releases/tags, out of scope for branches/commits — no content from it was used in this skill.
- **Research doc:** plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/sources.md
- **Contributing files:** (none)
- **Status:** `extracted`