feat(kyberforge): execute plugin-to-apm marketplace conversion
Why: ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills. Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88 (apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing). Implementation notes: - All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field, no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory, permissionMode). - Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package, matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice. - .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs. url, Unicode escaping). - plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0 for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped 0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated script (apm has no native version-bump automation). - Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml, scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh, scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures -- including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path isolation regression introduced mid-fix. - Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments. - Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive. Impact: plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on -- editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats, 13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean. Fixes: #90 Refs: #88, #89 ADR: 0015 ADR: 0016 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
topic: label-inference
|
||||
source_keys:
|
||||
- context7-websites-gitea
|
||||
- gitea-mcp-repo
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Label inference guide
|
||||
|
||||
Maps context-pattern signals from conversation content (an issue being drafted, a bug report, a PR
|
||||
description) to this repo's `Kind/*` / `Priority/*` / `Status/*` label taxonomy. Used by
|
||||
`gitea-issues` and `gitea-prs` before creating or updating an issue/PR, and directly when the user
|
||||
asks to label something without naming exact labels.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scoped labels are mutually exclusive — replace, don't stack
|
||||
|
||||
Each of `Kind/*`, `Priority/*`, `Status/*` is treated as a scoped-label group by convention (the `/`
|
||||
delimiter naming pattern). Gitea's `exclusive` flag — the mechanism that would let the server itself
|
||||
enforce one-label-per-scope — is documented as an org-labels-only setting, and the repo-level
|
||||
`label_write` methods used here don't accept it at all. So exclusivity within these scopes is a
|
||||
convention this skill enforces client-side, not something the server guarantees: applying a new
|
||||
label within a scope is expected to replace any existing label in that same scope on the target
|
||||
issue/PR, not add alongside it. When inference
|
||||
selects a `Priority/High` label and the issue already carries `Priority/Medium`, the write should
|
||||
result in only `Priority/High` remaining — use `replace_labels` scoped to that group's labels, or at
|
||||
minimum remove the superseded label before adding the new one. Never leave two labels from the same
|
||||
scope applied at once.
|
||||
|
||||
## Signal → label mapping
|
||||
|
||||
**`Kind/*`** (what kind of work this is):
|
||||
|
||||
| Signal in context | Label |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Bug report, error, crash, unexpected behavior, "broken", "doesn't work" | `Kind/Bug` |
|
||||
| New capability, "add support for", net-new functionality | `Kind/Feature` |
|
||||
| Improvement to existing behavior, "make X better", refactor with behavior change | `Kind/Enhancement` |
|
||||
| Docs-only change, README/comment/guide updates | `Kind/Documentation` |
|
||||
| Vulnerability, credential exposure, injection risk, auth bypass | `Kind/Security` |
|
||||
|
||||
**`Priority/*`** (urgency):
|
||||
|
||||
| Signal in context | Label |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| "blocking", "critical", "urgent", production-down | `Priority/Critical` |
|
||||
| "soon", "high priority", "should do this sprint" | `Priority/High` |
|
||||
| No urgency signal present | `Priority/Medium` (default) |
|
||||
|
||||
**`Status/*`** (workflow state):
|
||||
|
||||
| Signal in context | Label |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Explicit statement that the work is blocked on something else | `Status/Blocked` |
|
||||
|
||||
## Procedure
|
||||
|
||||
1. Read the conversation context (issue/PR title, body, or the triggering discussion) for the
|
||||
signals above.
|
||||
2. Call `label_read method: "list_repo_labels"` (see `references/labels.md`) to get the current
|
||||
label set with IDs — inference must never guess an ID, only a name, then resolve it.
|
||||
3. Match inferred label names against the resolved list (case-insensitive). If a scope group
|
||||
already has a different label applied on the target and a new one is inferred for that same
|
||||
scope, plan to replace rather than add (see above).
|
||||
4. **Low-confidence inference omits the label.** If no signal confidently maps to a `Kind/*` value,
|
||||
do not guess — omit `Kind/*` entirely rather than default to one. `Priority/Medium` is the one
|
||||
exception: it's the explicit default when no urgency signal is present, not a guess.
|
||||
5. Hand the resolved IDs (plus which scopes to replace) to the caller's `issue_write`/
|
||||
`pull_request_write` call — this skill does not apply labels to an issue or PR itself.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user