feat(kyberforge): execute plugin-to-apm marketplace conversion

Why:
ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace
this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those
files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by
hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills.
Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88
(apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing).

Implementation notes:
- All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry
  apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills
  moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents
  were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md
  compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents
  now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field,
  no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory,
  permissionMode).
- Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus
  mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package,
  matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice.
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now
  apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained
  content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only
  cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs.
  url, Unicode escaping).
- plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based
  authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0
  for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped
  0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now
  documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated
  script (apm has no native version-bump automation).
- Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across
  .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml,
  scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh,
  scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json
  (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh
  validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures --
  including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one
  extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path
  isolation regression introduced mid-fix.
- Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in
  apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace
  package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote
  shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's
  marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side
  AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and
  hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin
  init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional
  name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot
  marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the
  compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no
  dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the
  correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments.
- Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to
  copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob
  stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive.

Impact:
plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on --
editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and
run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries
reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and
ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope
unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin
validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace
check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats,
13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean.

Fixes: #90
Refs: #88, #89
ADR: 0015
ADR: 0016

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-12 18:09:37 +00:00
parent 50d5c30a3c
commit 5e232503c4
289 changed files with 741 additions and 1974 deletions

View File

@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
---
source_keys:
- agentskills-spec
- agentskills-best-practices
---
# Body Discipline Reference
Source: agentskills.io — skill-authoring
## The core test
For every sentence in the body, ask: **"Would the agent get this wrong without this instruction?"**
If no — cut it. The agent already knows it from general training. Adding it wastes tokens and dilutes the signal of what matters.
## What belongs in the body
Include content the agent lacks:
- Project-specific conventions and domain procedures it cannot infer
- Non-obvious edge cases and environment-specific gotchas
- The specific tools or sequences to use (not the full range of options)
- One default per decision point with one escape hatch
Do not include:
- Concepts the agent already knows (what JSON is, how HTTP works, what a CSV is)
- Exhaustive option lists — pick a default; the agent doesn't benefit from choosing
- Steps the agent handles independently — over-specifying leads to unproductive paths
- Restatements of the description — it's already in context
## Calibrating control
**Be prescriptive** when operations are fragile, consistency matters, or a specific sequence must be followed:
```markdown
Run exactly:
\`\`\`bash
python scripts/migrate.py --verify --backup
\`\`\`
Do not modify the command or add additional flags.
```
**Give freedom** when multiple approaches are valid. Explaining *why* outperforms rigid directives — agents make better decisions when they understand the purpose.
## Defaults not menus
Never present a list of equivalent options — pick one and mention the alternative briefly:
```markdown
# Too many options
Use pypdf, pdfplumber, PyMuPDF, or pdf2image...
# Default with escape hatch
Use pdfplumber for text extraction. For scanned PDFs requiring OCR, use pdf2image instead.
```
## Gotchas sections
Highest value content — environment-specific facts that defy reasonable assumptions. Place near the top of the body so the agent reads them before encountering the situation.
```markdown
## Gotchas
- The `users` table uses soft deletes. Always include `WHERE deleted_at IS NULL`.
- User ID is `user_id` in the database, `uid` in auth, `accountId` in billing. Same value.
```
Each entry must be a specific, surprising fact — not a general tip or reminder.
## Progressive disclosure
Keep `SKILL.md` under 500 lines. When more content is needed, move it to `references/` and load conditionally:
```markdown
If the API returns a non-200 status, read `references/api-errors.md`.
```
"If X, read Y" is more useful than "see references/ for details." The agent loads on demand rather than up front.
## Auditing guidance
Flag as FAIL if:
- A sentence answers "no" to the core test (would agent get this wrong without it?) — it is padding
- Decision points present a menu of options with no default
- Instructions repeat content already in the description
- Prescriptive sequences are used where flexibility is fine, or vice versa
Flag as SUGGESTION if:
- A rationale is missing from an include/exclude rule (present but unexplained)
- Gotchas are correct but placed late in the body rather than near the top
- A conditional reference trigger is vague ("see references/") rather than specific ("If X, read Y")

View File

@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
---
source_keys:
- agentskills-spec
- agentskills-optimizing-descriptions
---
# Description Quality Reference
Source: agentskills.io — optimizing-descriptions
## How triggering works
At startup, agents load only the `name` and `description` of each skill. When a user's task matches a description, the agent reads the full `SKILL.md` into context. **The description carries the entire triggering burden** — the body is never seen until after triggering.
Agents typically consult skills only for tasks requiring knowledge beyond their defaults. Specialized knowledge — unfamiliar APIs, domain-specific workflows, uncommon formats — is where description wording makes the difference.
## What a good description does
- **Imperative phrasing** — "Use when..." not "This skill does...". The agent is deciding whether to act.
- **User intent, not mechanics** — describe what the user is trying to achieve, not how the skill works internally.
- **Err toward being pushy** — explicitly name contexts where the skill applies, including cases where the user doesn't name the domain: "even if they don't mention X explicitly."
- **Specificity over vagueness** — "parses and validates OpenAPI specs" beats "helps with APIs."
- **Near-miss exclusions** — add "Do not use when..." only if a near-miss skill exists that could steal activations. Use strong near-misses (queries that share keywords but need something different), not weak ones ("write a fibonacci function").
- **Hard limit: 1024 characters** — descriptions grow during revision; check length before finalising.
## Before / after
```yaml
# Weak
description: Process CSV files.
# Strong
description: >
Analyze CSV and tabular data files — compute summary statistics,
add derived columns, generate charts, and clean messy data. Use when
the user has a CSV, TSV, or Excel file and wants to explore, transform,
or visualize the data, even if they don't explicitly mention "CSV" or
"analysis."
```
The strong version names capabilities precisely and broadens applicability beyond explicit keyword matches.
## Auditing guidance
Flag as FAIL if:
- Phrasing is descriptive ("This skill...") not imperative ("Use when...")
- Capabilities are vague ("helps with APIs") — require precise verbs and nouns
- No indirect trigger coverage when indirect cases clearly exist
- No near-miss exclusions when a sibling skill could plausibly steal activations
- Length exceeds 1024 characters
Flag as SUGGESTION if:
- Indirect trigger coverage exists but could be more specific
- Near-miss exclusions are present but target weak near-misses only

View File

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
# Sources
<!-- agentskills.io/llms.txt was used for initial source discovery and is not listed below; it contributed no skill file content directly. -->
## agentskills-home
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/home.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** Agent Skills overview — what it is, why it exists, progressive disclosure model, ecosystem of 35+ implementing tools
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## agentskills-spec
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/specification.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** Complete SKILL.md format specification — frontmatter fields, constraints, body content, optional directories, progressive disclosure levels, file references, validation
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md, references/body-discipline.md, references/description-quality.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## agentskills-best-practices
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/skill-creation/best-practices.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** Best practices for skill creators — starting from real expertise, spending context wisely, calibrating control, instruction patterns (gotchas, templates, checklists, validation loops)
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md, references/body-discipline.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## agentskills-optimizing-descriptions
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/skill-creation/optimizing-descriptions.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** How to systematically test and improve skill descriptions for triggering accuracy — eval queries, trigger rate testing, train/validation splits, optimization loop
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md, references/description-quality.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## agentskills-evaluating-skills
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/skill-creation/evaluating-skills.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** Eval-driven skill quality improvement — test case design, workspace structure, assertion writing, grading, benchmarking, human review, iteration loop
- **Contributing files:** (none — eval workflow not directly informing audit dimensions)
- **Status:** `extracted`
## agentskills-using-scripts
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/skill-creation/using-scripts.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** Using scripts in skills — one-off commands, self-contained scripts with inline dependencies, designing scripts for agentic use (no interactive prompts, --help, structured output, idempotency)
- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md
- **Status:** `extracted`
## agentskills-quickstart
- **URL:** https://agentskills.io/skill-creation/quickstart.md
- **Research doc:** plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/docs/agentskillsio/sources.md
- **Description:** Step-by-step guide to creating a first skill (roll-dice example), how discovery/activation/execution work in practice
- **Contributing files:** (none — creation guide not directly informing audit criteria)
- **Status:** `extracted`