54d7bd80baa04836843e7f3c1996e54567a16874
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ede3f06689 |
fix(kyberforge): restore the authoring rules the ADR-0020 trim dropped
Diffing each retrofitted SKILL.md against its replacement references/ files found rules that existed on main and now existed nowhere — relocated in intent, deleted in fact. A trim that loses a rule is not progressive disclosure, it is data loss with a smaller word count. Three had no survivor. The least-privilege guidance for `tools` kept its mechanics and lost the "restrict to what the agent needs" half, so the remaining text read as encouragement to omit the field. The improve flow lost its regression check, so nothing compared the closing audit against the pre-edit state and a PASS quietly becoming a SUGGESTION went unnoticed — restored on both halves of the author pair, since agent-author had dropped its equivalent too. And agent bodies lost "would the agent get this wrong without it?", which mattered more than it looks: ADR-0020 deliberately sets no body word gate for agents, three of the four already sit between 933 and 1,199 words, and the delegation check only fires on procedure a skill already owns. That heuristic was the only brake left. Two more were reachable only from the wrong scope. agent-author tells the reader to load only the file for the resolved scope, but the mcp__ glob syntax for disallowedTools and the five tools no subagent ever receives had both landed in project-user-scope.md. disallowedTools is the ONLY permitted fence at plugin/APM scope, so the scope that needs the syntax most could not reach it, and a plugin-scope run could write a body telling the agent to ask the user a question. Two documents were actively wrong rather than merely thin. agent-audit told auditors that validate.sh resolves boundary targets for skills only; it runs at both scopes, so the auditor was hand-resolving what the script had already decided and could contradict it. And skill-audit routed to its script-troubleshooting reference whenever validate.sh "fails" — but it exits 1 on ordinary content FAILs, the normal outcome for the whole #99 population, so 1,302 words loaded on nearly every audit. A context-budget regression inside the skill that enforces the context budget. Finally, two illustrations taught the shape the gate ERRORs on, unfenced, while an adjacent rubric called it a hard ERROR. LESSONS.md records the reference-chain depth rule flipping from "one level deep" to "two hops, never three". ADR-0020 is silent on it and the reversal rode entirely on the diff; the looser rule is what mandatory dispatch requires. Refs: #99 ADR: 0020 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015W3iwF9ncfRZddGBxsMCYi |
|||
| 311e7cd22c |
fix(kyberforge): reconcile the authoring rules the ADR-0020 trim left disagreeing
Six defects, each one a place where two files that an author reads in the same sitting told them different things — or where the trim dropped a rule and nothing noticed because no gate covers prose. **"Use proactively" contradicted itself across the pair.** All three agent templates said to add it where the runtime should delegate unprompted, while `agent-audit`'s `KyberforgeCopilot.ProactivePhrase` rule grades it a hard FAIL in any `*.agent.md` — which is the Copilot half of every project/user pair *and* the vendor-neutral plugin-scope file, since that compiles to a real Copilot agent downstream. Following the template produced a file the repo's own gate rejects. The phrase is now permitted in exactly one place, the Claude Code `.md`, and `references/contract.md` carries the per-file table plus the consequence authors ask about next: a pair whose CC half has it and whose Copilot half does not is correct, because `agent-audit` checks that both halves describe the same job, not that they match word for word. **The output-schema rule contradicted itself inside one file.** `contract.md` said any content only one branch reaches moves to `references/`, and then offered an "Output format template" body pattern with no qualification. Stated once now, so it is not re-litigated: an output schema stays in the body only when every flow produces it and it is roughly 50 words or less. No third option. **Gotchas tiers disagreed with the script.** `validate.sh` emits the entry count through `suggest()` and exits 0, while `skill-author` and `skill-audit` both called more than five entries a FAIL. Whether a given gotcha earns its place is judgment, so the prose moves to the script's tier rather than the reverse. The paraphrase rule stays a FAIL and is explicitly marked as the auditor's call — no script detects it. **The dispatch exemplar was cited at the wrong number.** `apm-workflow`'s body is 421 words; 554 is its whole-file count. Both `contract.md` and `body-discipline.md` cited 554 while describing a body budget, so an author calibrating against the exemplar overshot by ~30% — the exact whole-file/body-only conflation those two sections exist to warn against, reproduced inside the warning. **"Error handling" came back as a required body element.** It was one of four and is the one that gets dropped, and dropping it is not neutral: an agent handed malformed input with no instruction invents a recovery, and a subagent's invented recovery is invisible to its caller until the output is wrong. Restored in `agent-audit`'s rubric as a SUGGESTION, in `agent-author`'s contract and both scope checklists as a required element, and as an `## Errors` section in all three templates. **`skill-author` Step 4 gains the one check the audit misses.** An empty body reports `PASS SKILL.md body word count 0` — a word gate cannot tell "concise" from "absent". Step 4 now hand-checks for a non-empty section, and its commit verification is conditioned on actually being inside a git worktree, which a skill under `~/.claude/skills/` is not. Also here: absolute repo paths removed from `skill-author`'s SKILL.md and contract.md in favour of naming the skill (`zoom-out`'s description is quoted inline instead of pointed at), the boundary-target universe documented to match the resolver, a two-hops-from-SKILL.md limit on reference chains, and `new-agent.sh`'s next-steps output naming the description budget and the deliberate absence of an agent body gate. Refs: ADR-0020 |
|||
| 4a5c3c0cff |
feat(kyberforge): enforce the ADR-0020 context contract for skills and agents
Skill name+description pairs are preloaded into every session, costing ~6,200 tokens across 39 skills before any skill is invoked. The authoring rules mandated that growth: skill-author:104 and description-quality.md:21 both required padding, while skill-author:102 (the deflating rule) had no FAIL condition behind it. Gates (blocking, no baseline file): - description 250 chars SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL, measured on the folded YAML value - body-only 600 words SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL, independent of the unchanged whole-file 2770-word / 500-line spec backstop - every boundary-clause routing target must resolve to a real skill or agent; catches skill-improve, neuledge-context and gitea-labels - agents take the description gates but deliberately no body gate; a test pins that absence Vale: DescriptionOpener widened to ^This\b, new CompositionNote rule banning architecture notes from descriptions. 10 hits, 0 false positives. Kyberforge's own four skills retrofitted: descriptions 3,364 -> 938 chars (-72%), bodies 8,306 -> 2,487 words (-70%), all via the apm-workflow dispatch pattern. Fixes the skill-improve dangling route and the agent-author misroute to manual review. Also fixes a pre-existing false positive where any line-initial 'read ' was flagged as interactive input, which had already caused two scripts to be rewritten around it. Refs: ADR-0020 |
