Defame1297
54d7bd80ba
Closes the second open design decision on PR #103. The `/compact` finding was recorded as a false positive needing an allowlist or a suppression mechanism. It is neither: the routing universe is the apm marketplace, so a target either resolves to a skill or an agent or it does not resolve, and `/compact`, `/clear` and `/init` are Claude Code slash commands with no counterpart in Copilot CLI or Codex. `.apm/` source compiles for all three, so a vendor-neutral description routing to one is a portability defect and the hard FAIL is a true positive. An allowlist was rejected for a concrete reason, not a stylistic one: it answers a different question ("does this exist on some host?"), it cannot answer that portably from a single source file, and it goes stale the next time a host ships a command — reintroducing the same-commit-two-verdicts failure ADR-0020 already closed for deployed trees. Nothing is blocked today: zero of the 43 descriptions name a host built-in, and an author who needs to mention one writes it un-slashed, which is not route notation and carries no routing claim. Recorded in ADR-0020 and in both author-facing contract references, so the next agent reads the decision rather than "fixing" the gate. ADR: 0020 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>