644a77b0cb7988eb1615262e9ebf18abf50935d0
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP
|
598a7c326a |
refactor(skills): retrofit the corpus to the ADR-0020 context contract (#129)
Retrofits all 39 skills to ADR-0020's description/body context contract, then fixes what six rounds of independent review found in that retrofit — including four ways the hot gate itself failed open. Closes #99, #107, #108, #110, #111, #114, #115, #120. ## The retrofit (waves 1-5) | | Start | Now | |---|---|---| | Description FAILs (>400 chars) | 26 | **0** | | Body FAILs (>900 words, body-only) | 9 | **0** | | Dangling routing targets | 2 | **0** | | `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` | 10 | **0** | | Preload tax | 21,005 chars | **~10,500** | Under the 12,000-char success criterion. Per-wave detail is on #99. ## The review fixes **The gate failed open four ways, three of them found after the retrofit shipped.** An unrecognised follower token made a dangling target vanish. A skill directory with no `SKILL.md` resolved as a valid target, so a commit could be green locally and red in a fresh clone — three existing fixtures were relying on that, one of which made the install-leak A/B pass vacuously. Then the free-standing `/name` sweep turned out to be gated on the sentence carrying a boundary marker, so route notation in any other sentence was invisible — not an ERROR, not a SUGGESTION, not an INFO — which left the documented "`/name` always blocks" promise false from a second direction. All four fixed and pinned. **Two checks were silently not running.** `validate-provenance.sh` checks 7-8 were dead across nine skills. Waking them exposed a deeper problem: they assume `Research doc:` names a source index, but 30 of 121 entries point at topic content documents, so every new check-7 INFO was a false positive and check 8 was saved from a false-FAIL flood only by an *unannounced* skip. Checks 7/8 are now scoped to source indexes and every skip announces itself (#121). **The retrofit's own anti-goal, four times.** ADR-0020 warns that a blunt gate gets satisfied by deleting content rather than relocating it. `diagnose` and `skill-audit` relocated prose and then read it unconditionally; `prototype` and `vale-config` deleted rules outright that survived nowhere. All four addressed. ## Verification - `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict` — 24 suites, 0 skipped, 0 failed - `bash tests/run-bats.sh` — 325 tests, 0 failures - `pre-commit run --all-files` — 17/17 - `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files` — 16/16, with `apm marketplace check` and `apm pack --check-clean` run against the remote, not skipped - `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` over all 39 skills — rc 0, 0 ERROR/FAIL, SUGGESTION-only - Preload tax measured at **10,498 chars**, max description 390 — both inside budget - Every new test proven non-vacuous by a deliberate mutation of the behaviour it covers **Per-commit sync, stated accurately:** the ten commits from the latest review round each pass `check-plugin-content-sync` in isolation, verified by checking each out in a detached worktree with a clean between. The earlier gitea window (`dfacf05..bedbd1d`, nine commits) does **not** — its mirror was regenerated in one batch at `bbc7300`. An earlier revision of this description claimed the property held for every commit; it does not, and a bisect through that window lands on a red commit. **Squash-merge** to collapse it, or accept that this range is not bisectable. ## Version bump Six plugins and the catalog take a **patch**, not a minor. The branch is **89 commits — 40 `fix` / 30 `refactor` / 12 `docs` / 5 `chore` / 2 `test` — zero `feat`, zero `!`, zero `BREAKING CHANGE`** — and adds no skill, agent, command or hook. (Two earlier revisions of this section cited a stale histogram, most recently 78 commits; the figures above are measured at HEAD.) Both rules this repo ships (`forge/references/version-bump.md`, landing in this PR, and `git-commits/references/conventional-commits-spec.md`) make that a patch, and the catalog set is unchanged at 7 entries. Not settled by that: four published files were removed from the installed tree, three moved, and `caveman` gained `disable-model-invocation`, retiring its old triggers. Under a strict reading those are major-class and currently ship under `refactor:` with no marker. Whether the deployed skill surface is a public contract is written down nowhere — worth deciding, but it outlives this PR. ## Deliberately not in scope #112 (cherry-pick ownership, now resolved in favour of `git-commits`), #113 (`rtk git` normalisation), #116 (research fan-out), #101 (audit-skill merge), #122 (non-spec skill-root files), #123 (no PRD producer) stay open. #117 is the one worth reading: the contract's remedy is to move prose into `references/`, which is exactly where neither the size gate nor Vale looks — and the blind spot is wider than #117 currently records, since there is no root `.vale.ini` at all, so every ADR, `CONTEXT.md` and `README.md` is unlinted too. That blind spot let this branch carry two `level: error` `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` violations into `references/` files it created — `provider-adapter-author/references/provider-matrix.md:31` and `agent-audit/references/finding-criteria.md:95`. Both are reworded in `afadaae`, confirmed by routing each file through the audit's own `vale-wrap.sh` (1 error each before, 0 after). Five further occurrences sit in `references/` files already on `main`; those are the pre-existing corpus and stay with #117, which is the real fix. Also unfixed and not this PR's: `apm install` appends a duplicate `SessionStart` entry to `.claude/settings.json`, so a fresh clone cannot get pre-push green without an edit AGENTS.md warns against. Reproduces identically on `main`. Co-authored-by: Defame1297 <gitea@rkdr.net> Reviewed-on: https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/pulls/129 Co-authored-by: Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP <claude@noreply.git.dev.rkdr.net> Co-committed-by: Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP <claude@noreply.git.dev.rkdr.net> |
||
| 967d3ade25 |
fix(gitea): document the remaining create/update parameter asymmetries
Follow-up to the review of #106, which found four parameter claims the first pass left wrong or missing. All four verified against gitea-mcp v1.6.0 source before changing anything. `remove_deadline` is dropped on "create" like the others, but the new Gotcha enumerated a closed list that omitted it — so the paragraph contradicted its own opening sentence. The list is now open ("including") and the parameter carries the same "update" only marker as its neighbours. `base` is settable on "update": editPullRequestFn reads it and retargets the PR onto a different base branch. The file documented it as required for "create" and said nothing else, hiding a real capability. This one is under-claiming rather than over-claiming, but a file whose subject is which parameter applies to which method is the place to fix it. applyDraftPrefix strips two prefixes, `WIP:` and `[WIP]`, matched with strings.EqualFold, while only "WIP: " is ever added. The un-draft correction said "the prefix" singular, which understates what a caller can hand it. README.md bundled `reviewers` and `milestone` into "creating and updating". Capability prose rather than a parameter contract, so not strictly false, but it is the same conflation that produced the original bug and it is not behind any gate. Not addressed here: SKILL.md's description still advertises updating reviewers, its draft guidance still prescribes the manual workaround, and its milestone-resolution instruction carries no method qualifier — so an agent working from SKILL.md alone can still reach the failure mode. Those edits trip skill-size-check and the Vale prefilter, pulling in the ADR-0020 retrofit; tracked on #99 rather than done silently here. Refs: #104 Refs: #99 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ETxbGFetkbJQBHsx442Brt |
|||
| 4c9d2d7751 |
fix(gitea): correct which pull_request_write params apply on create
The gitea-prs reference documented `milestone` as "settable on both "create" and "update"". It is not: `pull_request_write method: "create"` accepts the parameter, returns no error or warning, and discards it. Verified against the gitea-mcp v1.6.0 source rather than by observation alone. `createPullRequestFn` builds its `CreatePullRequestOption` from owner, repo, title, body, head, base, draft, labels and deadline only — so the drop is not limited to `milestone` as issue #104 supposed. `assignee`, `assignees`, `reviewers` and `team_reviewers` are discarded on create too, and `reviewers`/`team_reviewers` are discarded on "update" as well; they are only ever read by "add_reviewers" and "remove_reviewers". Two properties made the original error easy to make and hard to catch, so both are now written down next to the correction: `labels` sits beside `milestone`, reads identically, and does apply on create; and `issue_write method: "create"` honours `assignees` and `milestone`, so the asymmetry is specific to pull requests. While in the file, corrected the adjacent draft gotcha. It prescribed reconstructing the un-prefixed title by hand to un-draft a PR; `applyDraftPrefix` shows "update" with `draft: false` and no `title` fetches the stored title and strips the prefix server-side. Impact: documentation only, no behaviour change. Callers following the old text silently created PRs with no milestone, assignee or reviewer. Confined to references/pull-requests.md, so the ADR-0020 skill gates do not apply and gitea-prs needs no #99 retrofit first. Fixes: #104 Refs: #99 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ETxbGFetkbJQBHsx442Brt |
|||
|
Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP
|
bc7b3ecdbf | refactor(gitea): deep modules — split flat dispatch skill into 6 domain skills + orchestrator + agent (#67) |
