parse_contributing_files documented that callers depend on None vs [], because a
parse failure returning [] would silently disable the check. Only check 8
honoured it; checks 4/5 (skill-audit) and 3/4 (agent-audit) used a truthiness
test, so an unreadable block disabled them without a word.
Two live corpus entries were skipping this way. A sweep of all 32 sources.md
found 134 entries, exactly 2 parsing to None, both in gitea-files: one heading
carried an inline parenthetical that defeated both regexes, and one (none) was
written without its leading bullet. Also pins EMPTY_SOURCE_KEYS_RE to the two
indents parse_source_keys actually reads.
agent-audit had no INFO tier at all, so it gains one rather than reporting a
check that could not run as a FAIL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
gitea-releases was the weakest skill in the plugin: no allowed-tools, no
owner/repo resolution, and a checkbox list where a dispatch table belongs, so
an agent reaching it had to guess both its permissions and its inputs. The
id-vs-tag_name trap — deleting by tag name where the API wants the numeric id —
is restored as an explicit Gotcha because it destroys the wrong release
silently.
Elsewhere the `exclusive` flag was documented on the wrong side of the
read/write split, and label data from one instance was presented as though it
were universal, which invites an agent to assume a taxonomy that does not
exist on the target repo. rename_branch was missing from the branch surface.
Reference prose and fences are cleaned up in passing.
The retrofit left only a descriptive sentence on the loaded path — "Gitea
never infers a prerelease from a -beta/-rc tag name" — and moved the
imperative into references/conventions.md behind a trigger listing semver
naming, release-notes sourcing and release-to-tag relationships. Draft and
prerelease are not in that list, and "cut a v2.0.0-beta.1" is exactly the
request where the caller does not raise the topic, so the rule was
unreachable from the flow that needs it.
Severity comes from the repair path: the MCP surface has create, get,
get_latest, list and delete only — there is no update or edit tool. A
release published without is_pre_release can only be corrected by
delete_release plus a fresh create, and get_latest_release points
consumers at the beta meanwhile. Neither SKILL.md nor call-signatures.md
said so anywhere.
The flags are now set explicitly on every create, the missing update tool
and its delete-and-recreate consequence are stated in the body, and the
semver pass-through rule stranded behind the same trigger is promoted
alongside it. call-signatures.md now cites the deployed tool description
as direct evidence that get_latest_release excludes drafts, while keeping
the prerelease half hedged — that remains unconfirmed.
Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.
Refs #99
SKILL.md called `exclusive` "an org-labels-only flag" and concluded that
applying a Kind/*, Priority/* or Status/* label "must replace the one
already there, not stack on it". Live `list_repo_labels` on this repo
returns `exclusive` on every REPO label: all seven Kind/* plus
Compat/Breaking are false, while Priority/*, Reviewed/* and Status/* are
true. So the field is not org-only, and the replace rule would strip a
valid Kind/* label — a destructive write from a false premise.
The nuance kept: label_write's `exclusive` parameter genuinely is
annotated org-only, so that row was schema-accurate. The error was
generalising a write-parameter restriction into a claim about where the
field exists. The row is qualified rather than deleted.
The rule is now per-label: where exclusive is true the server drops the
sibling itself, so do not pre-remove; where it is false the label is
legitimately stackable.
Also fixes the org-label fallback, which treated any list_org_labels
failure as proof the owner is a user account with no org pool and said so
was "an answer, not an error to report". Under the token scopes this skill
declares the call fails with required=[read:organization] before any
org-vs-user determination is made, so a capability gap was being reported
as an absent label. Scope errors are now distinguished and reported.
Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.
Refs #99
SKILL.md's headline Gotcha said `list_issues` "has no `type` filter", and
references/issues.md stated in bold that neither `type` nor `milestones`
exists, "despite both appearing in api-reference.md". Both parameters are
present on the deployed gitea-mcp v1.7.0 and both work: `type: "issues"`
returns only issues, `type: "pulls"` only PRs, and `milestones` filters by
name. Unfiltered, the same window returns them interleaved, so the mixing
the Gotcha describes is real — only the stated remedy was wrong.
This mattered most in gitea-workflow's no-args check-in, which lists open
issues through this skill and so reported PRs under "Open Issues" while
the skill forbade the one-parameter fix. The list flow now passes
`type: "issues"`.
references/sources.md recorded the absence as a live-verification win over
stale research docs; it now records that the earlier check was superseded
by v1.7.0, since drift runs in both directions. gitea-prs cited the same
parameter as its canonical drift example and no longer does — no
replacement example was substituted, because the obvious candidate was not
verified in this pass.
Also defaults label writes to `add_labels`: `replace_labels` clears every
label not in the array, and per-label exclusivity makes blanket replacement
destructive for a non-exclusive scope.
Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.
Refs #99
The retrofit (dfacf05) collapsed a Gotcha into a bidirectional claim —
"deleting a tag never deletes the release wrapping it" — that
references/call-signatures.md never confirms; that file explicitly
marks the reverse direction unconfirmed and "the more dangerous
direction to get wrong." State only the confirmed direction (deleting
a release doesn't delete its tag) and flag the reverse as unconfirmed
with a verification step, on a destructive, irreversible operation.
Found by an independent post-closure audit of #99 (agent-audit +
skill-audit re-run against every changed skill/agent).
references/commits.md cited overview.md as the authority for a
scope-gating claim, but no such file exists in this skill's package —
the only overview.md is an external research doc not shipped with the
skill. Repoint to branches.md's own Token scope section, which states
and confirms the same principle, and drop the unverifiable
write:repository enumeration detail no file in this skill actually
makes.
Found by an independent post-closure audit of #99 (agent-audit +
skill-audit re-run against every changed skill/agent).
An independent audit of the ADR-0020 retrofit (issue #99) found that
git-submodules, git-worktrees, and gitea-files each collapsed their
description length correctly during retrofit but left the capability
clause as a verb enumeration (e.g. "Create, list, lock, move, remove,
prune, or repair") instead of ADR-0020's required single clause. The
deterministic char-count gate can't catch this — it's a qualitative
rubric violation the retrofit commits' own messages never claimed to
address, only measurable length/word-count fixes.
Validated clean via skill-audit and skill-size-check after the fix;
boundary clauses and routing targets left untouched.
Refs #99
body-discipline.md required every reference load to use the literal
'If X, read references/file.md' form and called anything else a generic
pointer. ADR-0020's own cited dispatch exemplar, apm-workflow, uses a
bare table plus one closing line, so an author could not satisfy both --
and the rule reliably produced duplication in exactly the bodies the
contract exists to keep short.
Resolves#109 with its option 1: a table row already pairs a condition
with a target, so where a body dispatches, the table is the wiring. The
literal form is what a body needs when it loads a reference without a
table.
Two corrections to the issue as filed. There is no Vale conflict --
PaddingPhrase.yml only matches 'see references/ for more info' and never
fired on the exemplar, so this is a one-file prose fix and no rule
changes. And gitea-workflow carried the predicted duplication: a
three-row table restated underneath as three conditionals. Removed, body
227 -> 148 words.
Closes#109
Description 1012 -> 347 chars, body 582 -> 170 words, Gotchas 3 entries -> 1 at
22.9% of body. Clears the description FAIL and all four Vale CompositionNote
errors -- the last carriers in the corpus, so that rule now fires nowhere.
Cut the 'human-facing entry point and router' architecture note, the /gitea
migration history and the six-skill composition list; all were already in the
README or the routing table.
Split three mutually exclusive flows into a dispatch table keyed on invocation
shape, each branch self-contained in references/: status-checkin.md,
number-resolution.md, skill-index.md. Report stays in the body as the gate
common to every branch; each branch's own format moved to its file. The old
Step 1-4 numbering presented three alternatives as a sequence.
The description grew from an intermediate 283 chars on purpose: that draft had
dropped flow 3's trigger entirely, leaving the domain-routing index -- a third
of the skill -- reachable only through a tail clause whose grammatical subject
was the request rather than the skill. Both gates were green over that.
Boundary clauses are one arrow per target, so both resolve (#107: the resolver
extracts only the first target per clause and reports 1 of 1 on a clause naming
two). The local-git exclusion keeps its wording but drops the route to
git-workflow, which would not resolve in a gitea-only install.
Known residual: the dispatch conditions are stated twice, as a table and as
literal conditionals. That is #109 -- body-discipline.md mandates the literal
form while the ADR's cited exemplar, apm-workflow, uses a bare table plus one
summary line. Fixing it here would settle that contradiction in a skill rather
than in the spec, so it rides with #109.
Refs #99, #107, #109
Description 835 -> 214 chars, body 669 -> 426 words, Gotchas 8 entries/63% of
body -> 3/20.4%. Clears the description FAIL, all three Vale CompositionNote
errors and both Gotchas suggestions. 63% was the worst Gotchas ratio in the
corpus.
Cut the composition sentence to README -- it changes no routing decision and an
agent picks this skill because the user asked about labels, not because two
other skills call it. Cut the capability enumeration; 'list, create, edit,
delete' decompose 'reading or writing' and add no trigger.
Boundary clauses are now one arrow per target. The resolver extracts only the
first name per arrow clause, so the previous '-> gitea-issues / gitea-prs' left
gitea-prs neither dangling nor checked while validate.sh reported 1 of 1. Now
2 of 2.
Makes org-scoped label resolution executable. The org label pool was reachable
in principle -- four *_org_label* methods, and a claim to own name-to-ID
resolution -- but list_org_labels takes org, and Step 1 derived only owner and
repo, so both resolution procedures stalled at the fallback. Fixed once at the
identity step rather than per-procedure. get_user_orgs is outside allowed-tools,
so the failing call is the discriminator: a failure means the owner is a user
account with no org pool, which is an answer, not an error.
Corrects a Gotcha that was false for create_repo_label/create_org_label and
collided with the literal tool name label_write. Same false claim removed from
README.
Refs #99
Description 827 -> 182 chars, body 902 -> 584 words, Gotchas 7 entries/43% of
body -> 4/23.1%. Clears both size FAILs, the dangling-target FAIL and the Vale
CompositionNote error.
The dangling 'gitea-labels' target is gone with the composition sentence that
carried it -- a YAML fold artifact, not a typo: the '>'-folded scalar joined
'gitea-labels-' and 'milestones' across a line break, leaving the name terminal
and danglable. Both boundary names now sit whole on one source line each, and
both resolve.
Cut the second trigger register, the seven-verb capability enumeration, the
issue_write implementation detail and a gitea-branches boundary that defended
nothing. Two Gotchas deleted as spec restatement carried in references/, one as
a paraphrase of the step below it.
Closes a capability hole rather than papering over it: gitea-labels-milestones
routes label application here and has no issue_write, but no dispatch row
existed for add/replace/remove/clear_labels or get_labels. Both rows added.
The label ID/name Gotcha is now stated per method -- issue_write takes IDs,
list_issues and search_issues filter by name, issue_read 'get' returns names
but 'get_labels' returns full objects with IDs.
Drops a stale quotation of gitea-labels-milestones' description from
references/enrichments.md; that string went with its composition note.
Refs #99
The reference files were last verified against v1.3.0 -- references/sources.md
still said so. PR #106 re-verified the write side only, so three defects had
accumulated on the read/review side. All three reproduced against the deployed
server before being fixed; get_gitea_mcp_server_version reports v1.7.0.
- reviews.md forbade review_comments on the "get" response and directed callers
to review_scomments, which does not exist. The upstream slim.go typo was
corrected; a live pull_request_read on PR #106 returns "review_comments":1 and
no review_scomments key. review_comments is an integer count, not comment
objects -- distinct from the get_review_comments method. Also fixed in
pull-requests.md's response-shape list.
- pull_request_review_write grants seven methods; only four were documented.
reply_comment, resolve_thread, unresolve_thread and the comment_id parameter
had zero mentions anywhere in the skill. Documented from the schema, in a
Comment threads section kept outside the numbered review state machine --
they are not lifecycle states.
- review_id was documented as required for get_review_comments. It is optional;
omitting it lists every inline comment on the PR. Confirmed behaviourally:
get_review without it errors, get_review_comments without it returns [].
sources.md now records v1.7.0 as the last-verified version, so the next reader
knows what these files were checked against.
Refs #99
Description 709 -> 161 chars, body 683 -> 353 words, Gotchas 8 entries/56% of
body -> 2/24.9%. Clears the description FAIL and both Vale CompositionNote
errors.
Fixes the three stale claims recorded on issue #99, all re-verified against the
deployed gitea-mcp schema during review:
- The description no longer advertises 'reviewers' as an update capability.
editPullRequestFn never reads reviewers or team_reviewers; only
add_reviewers/remove_reviewers do.
- milestone is now marked honoured on "update" only, in the Gotcha, the body
and the dispatch table's create row. On "create" the server discards it and
omits the key from the response, so the drop is indistinguishable from never
passing it -- and labels DOES apply on create, so labels landing is no
evidence the milestone did. The old text told callers to resolve a milestone
before any write, wasting the lookup on create.
- The superseded un-draft workaround is gone. "update" with draft:false and no
title makes the server strip the prefix itself, including [WIP],
case-insensitively -- carried by references/pull-requests.md, corrected in
PR #106.
The 22-row tool/method table becomes a 5-row dispatch table; all 20 operations
it named remain reachable, including update_branch and the reviewer methods.
Refs #99
Description 787 -> 263 chars, body 922 -> 302 words, Gotchas 9 entries/69% of
body -> 3/24.8%. Clears both size FAILs and both Gotchas suggestions.
Deleted the second trigger register outright -- ~300 chars re-quoting the same
six verbs as user phrasings, which ADR-0020 names this skill for specifically.
Split the body on the read/write boundary: one invocation cannot both read and
write, so a dispatch table is mandatory. Six operations collapse into two flow
files rather than six -- create/update/delete share one tool pair and one
SHA-first lifecycle whose preamble would otherwise be triplicated, and the three
read tools share ref selection plus a 'neither listing is a SHA source'
comparison that only exists between them.
references/examples.md removed; all eight of its content blocks and all nine
named parameters carry into references/writing.md, verified against git HEAD.
Two deltas are corrections: the repo tree is now ruled out as a SHA source, and
reusing a SHA captured earlier in the conversation is now forbidden.
Four Gotchas relocated to the flow file that needs them; two promoted to gates
(SHA-as-concurrency-token opens writing.md; owner/repo became ## Inputs).
Refs #99
Description 688 -> 282 chars, body 435 -> 293 words, Gotchas 5 entries/54% of
body -> 3/23.5%. Clears the description FAIL and the Gotchas suggestion.
Cut the second trigger register (six re-quoted user phrasings) and the capability
enumeration; both moved to a new Boundaries section in the skill's own README.
Kept all three boundary clauses -- git-branches, git-history and gitea-prs each
defend a real activation steal, and gitea-prs is now the only guard on the
branch/PR collision in either direction since gitea-prs's own retrofit narrowed
its boundary to issues. Written as one arrow per target: the resolver extracts
only the first name per arrow clause, so conjoined targets go unchecked.
Two Gotchas deleted -- one paraphrased the step below it (its non-obvious half,
the get_me/list_my_repos token-scope block, was folded into that step), the other
is carried in full by references/branches.md:40-52.
Repoint two reference pointers the rename broke: branches.md and commits.md named
Gotchas by titles this retrofit changed. Now named by stable descriptors.
Refs #99
Description 500 -> 211 chars, body 676 -> 462 words, Gotchas 5 entries/41% of
body -> 3/21%. Clears the description FAIL and both Gotchas suggestions.
Cut the second trigger register (the re-quoted user phrasings), the doubled
capability enumeration across releases and tags, and the gitea-issues/gitea-prs
boundary, which defended against nothing -- neither was going to win a release
request. Kept the indirect trigger and the one real near-miss, gitea-branches.
Releases and tags are one flow, not two: 'delete the release and its tag' is a
single invocation that takes both branches, which disqualifies mutual
exclusivity, so no dispatch split. Two Gotchas moved to references/ behind
explicit triggers; one deleted as a paraphrase of the step below it.
Refs #99
Follow-up to the review of #106, which found four parameter claims the
first pass left wrong or missing. All four verified against gitea-mcp
v1.6.0 source before changing anything.
`remove_deadline` is dropped on "create" like the others, but the new
Gotcha enumerated a closed list that omitted it — so the paragraph
contradicted its own opening sentence. The list is now open ("including")
and the parameter carries the same "update" only marker as its neighbours.
`base` is settable on "update": editPullRequestFn reads it and retargets
the PR onto a different base branch. The file documented it as required
for "create" and said nothing else, hiding a real capability. This one is
under-claiming rather than over-claiming, but a file whose subject is
which parameter applies to which method is the place to fix it.
applyDraftPrefix strips two prefixes, `WIP:` and `[WIP]`, matched with
strings.EqualFold, while only "WIP: " is ever added. The un-draft
correction said "the prefix" singular, which understates what a caller
can hand it.
README.md bundled `reviewers` and `milestone` into "creating and
updating". Capability prose rather than a parameter contract, so not
strictly false, but it is the same conflation that produced the original
bug and it is not behind any gate.
Not addressed here: SKILL.md's description still advertises updating
reviewers, its draft guidance still prescribes the manual workaround, and
its milestone-resolution instruction carries no method qualifier — so an
agent working from SKILL.md alone can still reach the failure mode. Those
edits trip skill-size-check and the Vale prefilter, pulling in the
ADR-0020 retrofit; tracked on #99 rather than done silently here.
Refs: #104
Refs: #99
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ETxbGFetkbJQBHsx442Brt
The gitea-prs reference documented `milestone` as "settable on both
"create" and "update"". It is not: `pull_request_write method: "create"`
accepts the parameter, returns no error or warning, and discards it.
Verified against the gitea-mcp v1.6.0 source rather than by observation
alone. `createPullRequestFn` builds its `CreatePullRequestOption` from
owner, repo, title, body, head, base, draft, labels and deadline only —
so the drop is not limited to `milestone` as issue #104 supposed.
`assignee`, `assignees`, `reviewers` and `team_reviewers` are discarded
on create too, and `reviewers`/`team_reviewers` are discarded on
"update" as well; they are only ever read by "add_reviewers" and
"remove_reviewers".
Two properties made the original error easy to make and hard to catch,
so both are now written down next to the correction: `labels` sits
beside `milestone`, reads identically, and does apply on create; and
`issue_write method: "create"` honours `assignees` and `milestone`, so
the asymmetry is specific to pull requests.
While in the file, corrected the adjacent draft gotcha. It prescribed
reconstructing the un-prefixed title by hand to un-draft a PR;
`applyDraftPrefix` shows "update" with `draft: false` and no `title`
fetches the stored title and strips the prefix server-side.
Impact: documentation only, no behaviour change. Callers following the
old text silently created PRs with no milestone, assignee or reviewer.
Confined to references/pull-requests.md, so the ADR-0020 skill gates do
not apply and gitea-prs needs no #99 retrofit first.
Fixes: #104
Refs: #99
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01ETxbGFetkbJQBHsx442Brt
Why:
ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace
this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those
files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by
hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills.
Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88
(apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing).
Implementation notes:
- All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry
apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills
moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents
were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md
compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents
now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field,
no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory,
permissionMode).
- Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus
mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package,
matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice.
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now
apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained
content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only
cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs.
url, Unicode escaping).
- plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based
authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0
for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped
0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now
documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated
script (apm has no native version-bump automation).
- Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across
.pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml,
scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh,
scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json
(stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh
validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures --
including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one
extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path
isolation regression introduced mid-fix.
- Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in
apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace
package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote
shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's
marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side
AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and
hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin
init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional
name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot
marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the
compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no
dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the
correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments.
- Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to
copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob
stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive.
Impact:
plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on --
editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and
run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries
reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and
ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope
unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin
validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace
check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats,
13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean.
Fixes: #90
Refs: #88, #89
ADR: 0015
ADR: 0016
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
