gitea-files' always-loaded Gotchas said "content is base64 both ways" without
qualification. The `main` text carried an exception for `withLines: true` and both
halves were dropped. Verified live: `get_file_contents` with `withLines: true`
returns plain JSON text while the same response still reports `"encoding":"base64"`.
An agent that follows the recommendation two sentences later and applies the
unconditional decode gets garbage, with the response's own field confirming the
wrong answer. Exception restored, and the lying field named.
gitea-orchestrate was never updated for `rename_branch`: absent from the operation
enum, so an agent caller got "unknown operation", and absent from the
destructive-confirm list, though branches.md requires a rename with open PRs or a
protection rule to be confirmed exactly as `delete_branch` is. Added to both — the
confirm gate rather than the enum alone, because accepting the operation without it
routes around a rule the skill states while appearing to support it. The
compatibility frontmatter, which the agent reads, still omitted the tool too.
Two more always-loaded Gotchas contradicted their own reference files, and the
Gotcha was wrong both times: issues and PRs are distinguishable on a list item by
the `html_url` path segment (confirmed live — #129 at /pulls/, #128 at /issues/),
and `get_repository_tree` takes `tree_sha`, not `ref`.
`review_comments` was asserted as unconditionally present on the PR get response.
It is absent on a PR with no review comments, so the claim is downgraded to
present-when-non-zero rather than stated as response shape.
The label-exclusivity relocation moved the rule out of label-inference.md and into
labels.md without updating sources.md, leaving the one rule in this branch that
writes differently to live repos citing a file that no longer carries it. The rule
itself is correct as it stands and `main` was wrong — every Kind/* label on this
instance is exclusive:false, every Priority/* and Status/* is true — so only the
provenance record is corrected.
Routing: gitea-workflow lost the human-caller discriminator and widened from status
checks to any request, which sent "close #42" to a branch that resolves the number
and presents detail without ever closing it. gitea-branches and gitea-issues regain
trigger phrasings the retrofit dropped.
Refs: #92
gitea-issues asserted flatly that a merge never closes an issue, contradicting
gitea-prs' references/merging.md, which documents that closing keywords in
commits landing on the default branch do close one. The qualifier that made the
claim true had been deleted; both sides now agree.
gitea-releases had lost an epistemic hedge and its verification step, leaving
conventions.md asserting unconfirmed tag auto-creation as fact. Nothing in the
research corpus sources it, so the hedge and the verify-afterward instruction are
back rather than upgraded.
Descriptions were cut 50-240 chars under the 400 budget and shed routing with
them: gitea-workflow's boundary named no target, gitea-prs lost the issue/PR
number-space directive the suite is built around at 163/400, gitea-releases lost
its boundary and every trigger. Restored, inside budget. Also restores
delete_branch's hard-refusal strength and gitea-files' Read/Write/Edit pointer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
SKILL.md's headline Gotcha said `list_issues` "has no `type` filter", and
references/issues.md stated in bold that neither `type` nor `milestones`
exists, "despite both appearing in api-reference.md". Both parameters are
present on the deployed gitea-mcp v1.7.0 and both work: `type: "issues"`
returns only issues, `type: "pulls"` only PRs, and `milestones` filters by
name. Unfiltered, the same window returns them interleaved, so the mixing
the Gotcha describes is real — only the stated remedy was wrong.
This mattered most in gitea-workflow's no-args check-in, which lists open
issues through this skill and so reported PRs under "Open Issues" while
the skill forbade the one-parameter fix. The list flow now passes
`type: "issues"`.
references/sources.md recorded the absence as a live-verification win over
stale research docs; it now records that the earlier check was superseded
by v1.7.0, since drift runs in both directions. gitea-prs cited the same
parameter as its canonical drift example and no longer does — no
replacement example was substituted, because the obvious candidate was not
verified in this pass.
Also defaults label writes to `add_labels`: `replace_labels` clears every
label not in the array, and per-label exclusivity makes blanket replacement
destructive for a non-exclusive scope.
Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.
Refs #99
Description 827 -> 182 chars, body 902 -> 584 words, Gotchas 7 entries/43% of
body -> 4/23.1%. Clears both size FAILs, the dangling-target FAIL and the Vale
CompositionNote error.
The dangling 'gitea-labels' target is gone with the composition sentence that
carried it -- a YAML fold artifact, not a typo: the '>'-folded scalar joined
'gitea-labels-' and 'milestones' across a line break, leaving the name terminal
and danglable. Both boundary names now sit whole on one source line each, and
both resolve.
Cut the second trigger register, the seven-verb capability enumeration, the
issue_write implementation detail and a gitea-branches boundary that defended
nothing. Two Gotchas deleted as spec restatement carried in references/, one as
a paraphrase of the step below it.
Closes a capability hole rather than papering over it: gitea-labels-milestones
routes label application here and has no issue_write, but no dispatch row
existed for add/replace/remove/clear_labels or get_labels. Both rows added.
The label ID/name Gotcha is now stated per method -- issue_write takes IDs,
list_issues and search_issues filter by name, issue_read 'get' returns names
but 'get_labels' returns full objects with IDs.
Drops a stale quotation of gitea-labels-milestones' description from
references/enrichments.md; that string went with its composition note.
Refs #99
Why:
ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace
this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those
files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by
hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills.
Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88
(apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing).
Implementation notes:
- All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry
apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills
moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents
were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md
compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents
now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field,
no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory,
permissionMode).
- Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus
mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package,
matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice.
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now
apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained
content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only
cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs.
url, Unicode escaping).
- plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based
authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0
for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped
0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now
documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated
script (apm has no native version-bump automation).
- Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across
.pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml,
scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh,
scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json
(stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh
validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures --
including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one
extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path
isolation regression introduced mid-fix.
- Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in
apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace
package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote
shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's
marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side
AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and
hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin
init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional
name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot
marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the
compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no
dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the
correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments.
- Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to
copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob
stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive.
Impact:
plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on --
editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and
run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries
reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and
ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope
unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin
validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace
check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats,
13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean.
Fixes: #90
Refs: #88, #89
ADR: 0015
ADR: 0016
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
