c5f754d3ad0640fd69064ccd89498dc5fd36b21c
15 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c5f754d3ad |
fix(gates): check body-level routing targets, not just descriptions
The ADR-0020 boundary resolver (boundary_targets()/unresolved_targets()) only ever read a SKILL.md's description. A target named in the BODY -- a dispatch table row, a "run X" step, both routine in a 900-word procedure -- was checked by nothing. Two real instances shipped before either was caught by reading rather than by a gate: bin/write-docs routed twice to a deleted `to-prd` skill, and bin/triage told an agent to run a nonexistent `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` (both fixed in 03abcff; that fix was the symptom, this gate is the actual ask per #124). Added a separate, narrower extractor -- body_targets() / unresolved_body_targets() in the shared lib-boundary-resolver.sh -- rather than reusing the description resolver at wider scope. The description gate's sentence-level heuristics (BOUNDARY_MARKER, the follower test, in-sentence corroboration) are tuned for a one-to-three-sentence routing clause and misfire on dispatch-table/procedure prose in both directions, so the body gate reads only explicit route notation (`/name`, backticked-or-slash-prefixed `-> name` / `-> name`), already the description gate's own unconditionally-blocking tier. Three guards were added after running the extractor over the real 39-skill corpus and reading every hit rather than assuming the design was correct: - a target must be hyphenated, even in notation -- single-word citations like `/fork` (forge, citing Claude Code's own /fork command) and `/name` (skill-author, a placeholder) are not routes. - a bare hyphenated word after any arrow is not notation -- only ARROW_MARKED (backticked/slash-prefixed) is used, not NOTATION_ARROW's bare form, so ordinary process-chain prose ("prop -> new ref -> re-render", caveman) is not read as a route. - a name immediately preceded by `<` is a closing tag (`</what-to-do>`, grill-with-docs), not /name notation. Wired into both consumers that must agree by contract: scripts/ skill-size-check.sh (the pre-commit hook) and factory-audit's lib-checks-skill.sh (the audit). Verified identical findings across both over the whole corpus. tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh gains a dedicated section pinning the two live true positives and all three guards. docs/spec/gates.md and ADR-0020 get a matching amendment. Fixes: #124 ADR: 0020 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EGHFJextYtVQseaHPDDhxB |
|||
| 44bde9e9c9 |
docs(adr): correct the records the branch left describing deleted things
Seven ADRs described code that no longer exists or behaviour the gates do
not have. Where the wrong text came from main it carries a dated
correction; where this branch introduced it, it is fixed in place, because
main never published it and there is no record to preserve.
Fixed in place, branch-introduced:
- ADR-0021's 2026-09-14 correction asserted apm audit --ci "was never a
drift gate at all". It is one: it replays the install and diffs. The
claim contradicted this branch's own AGENTS.md and gates.md.
- ADR-0015 said unconditionally that no pre-push hook needs the network.
The guarantee holds only once apm install has populated apm_modules/.
- ADR-0014's 2026-09-16 correction said restoring .pre-commit-hooks.yaml
would ship a hook that fails for every consumer, because their checkout
has no lib-boundary-resolver.sh. pre-commit clones the whole hook repo
and skill-size-check.sh resolves the library from BASH_SOURCE, so the
hook would work.
- ADR-0019's "twelve hooks pass under unshare -rn" matched neither HEAD
(8) nor main (14), and stated the offline guarantee unconditionally.
Corrected, inherited from main:
- ADR-0022 and ADR-0013 named skill-frontmatter's pre-commit hook as the
enforcer of mandatory metadata.version. That hook was deleted on this
branch; the check lives in skill-size-check.sh.
- ADR-0022 enumerated the tip rule's carve-outs as a closed list and
described a single merge-base. The gate also exempts a tree-identical
skill and intersects every base from merge-base --all, and emits a third
failure form.
|
|||
| e62188c3c3 |
docs(adr): record the author-pair drift decision in ADR-0020
The accepted ADR still called the skill-author/agent-author duplication an open input to #101. The branch decided it: continued drift, no sync gate, on the measured 150-180 line overlap. State that decision so the ADR stops contradicting the PR that closes #101, and mark the old skill-audit citation historical. Refs: #101 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| ef27c9751a |
refactor(gates): source the boundary resolver into skill-size-check
Why: scripts/skill-size-check.sh embedded a byte-identical 1,061-line copy
of the ADR-0020 boundary resolver only because it was also exported
through .pre-commit-hooks.yaml, whose consumers could not reach a file
inside the plugin.
|
|||
| 02d5774a99 |
docs: refute finding 15 on measurement
Why: finding 15 proposed merging skill-author and agent-author on the claim that they share most of contract.md and near-identical steps. Measured, the pair shares about 150-180 distinct non-blank lines, against the 2,934 the factory-audit merge removed. ADR-0020's exclusion of the pair holds, so the merge does not proceed. Implementation Notes: finding 15 is struck through and carries a dated Refuted note with per-file counts and the command that reproduces them. The §7 order and status notes and the §8 ADR-0012 bullet now show no open finding, with 22 deferred with bin. ADR-0020's rejected alternative records the measurement; ADR-0025 point 7 no longer calls the finding open and unmeasured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 69119f4754 |
docs: reconcile the ADRs, gates and audit log with the shipped behaviour
Why A six-agent review of the two preceding commits found their code sound -- the differential claim holds, the published hook contract is byte-unchanged -- but their prose drifted from it in three ways: statements of fact the code contradicts, markers in a convention this repo does not use, and figures that went stale when the merge changed what they counted. Implementation Notes ADR-0025's edge-path table is rewritten around one stated doctrine: exit 0 is audited and clean, exit 1 is audited with findings or a target present but unreadable, exit 2 is that nothing was audited. Its old row 1 promised "one generic matches-neither message" for three different inputs; there are three distinct messages, and the missing-path case exited 1 until the preceding commit fixed it. Rows are added for the preflight and CDPATH changes, because a table claiming to enumerate every entry-point behaviour change reproduces its own "an earlier revision of this ADR said they were behaviour-neutral" failure if it omits any. ADR-0025 also gains a Consequences supersession record in ADR-0016's form: partially-superseded entries for 0008, 0014, 0020 and 0021, and explicit "is not superseded" entries with reasoning for the rest. Twelve ADRs are amended and it previously listed none. ADR-0008 moves from an amendment note to partially superseded. Its contract genuinely narrowed -- an agent .md outside an agents/ directory was audited before the merge and is refused now -- and ADR-0020 already recorded that the merge "reopens ADR-0008". Its detector description said "a path under .apm/agents/", the phrasing ADR-0025 rejects as wider than the script and circular; the shipped rule is a .md whose immediate parent is named agents/, at any scope. ADR-0020's amendment claimed the boundary resolver is sourced by validate-provenance.sh. It is not, and never was; only validate.sh sources it, once per mode branch. Three Home-column entries pointed at reference filenames the merge renamed, one of which now resolves to two files because its row covers skills and agents. Five ADRs opened with "Skill renamed per ADR-0025", a form this repo does not use, in the same commit that used the conventional "Amended by ADR-0025" twice. They are normalized. "Renamed" was also wrong: the BREAKING-CHANGE trailer says the skills were removed and their flows merged. SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md had 2026-09-15 notes attached to headlines that were never updated, against its own convention of correcting in place with strikethrough. Every figure here was re-derived at HEAD by command, and several differed from the review's own numbers, so the notes record the basis rather than the result alone. LESSONS.md asserted the two review-time suite failures were the SIGPIPE race. The commit that fixed that race explicitly declined to claim it -- the suite was running while agents edited live config files -- so the hedge is restored. Impact No code, test or configuration change; documentation only. Suites stay 20/20 strict with 0 skipped and 374/374 bats. No gate parses ADR or gates.md content, so nothing here is load-bearing for a hook. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD |
|||
| 620f20b0fd |
refactor(kyberforge)!: merge skill-audit and agent-audit into factory-audit
Why The two audit skills carried 1,724 lines of byte-identical duplication: the ADR-0020 boundary resolver (1,061), vale-wrap.sh (526), the Vale style rules (44) and the Contributing-files parser (93). Nothing shared them — they were held in sync by a 413-line pre-push gate and its 797-line test suite. Sync-by-gate had already failed once: at |
|||
| a6434e0cdb |
docs: amend ADR-0021 and close the loose ends ADR-0024 left behind
A six-agent review of today's commits found three documentation defects that the apm-only change left behind. All three are records that describe deleted machinery in the present tense; no code or gate is affected. ADR-0021 was the one ADR that ADR-0024 invalidates without carrying an amendment note -- 0001, 0006, 0011, 0013, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0018 and 0019 all got one. Its Context section still compiles a plugin description into four generated files and its Consequences section still names eight, but |
|||
|
|
598a7c326a |
refactor(skills): retrofit the corpus to the ADR-0020 context contract (#129)
Retrofits all 39 skills to ADR-0020's description/body context contract, then fixes what six rounds of independent review found in that retrofit — including four ways the hot gate itself failed open. Closes #99, #107, #108, #110, #111, #114, #115, #120. ## The retrofit (waves 1-5) | | Start | Now | |---|---|---| | Description FAILs (>400 chars) | 26 | **0** | | Body FAILs (>900 words, body-only) | 9 | **0** | | Dangling routing targets | 2 | **0** | | `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` | 10 | **0** | | Preload tax | 21,005 chars | **~10,500** | Under the 12,000-char success criterion. Per-wave detail is on #99. ## The review fixes **The gate failed open four ways, three of them found after the retrofit shipped.** An unrecognised follower token made a dangling target vanish. A skill directory with no `SKILL.md` resolved as a valid target, so a commit could be green locally and red in a fresh clone — three existing fixtures were relying on that, one of which made the install-leak A/B pass vacuously. Then the free-standing `/name` sweep turned out to be gated on the sentence carrying a boundary marker, so route notation in any other sentence was invisible — not an ERROR, not a SUGGESTION, not an INFO — which left the documented "`/name` always blocks" promise false from a second direction. All four fixed and pinned. **Two checks were silently not running.** `validate-provenance.sh` checks 7-8 were dead across nine skills. Waking them exposed a deeper problem: they assume `Research doc:` names a source index, but 30 of 121 entries point at topic content documents, so every new check-7 INFO was a false positive and check 8 was saved from a false-FAIL flood only by an *unannounced* skip. Checks 7/8 are now scoped to source indexes and every skip announces itself (#121). **The retrofit's own anti-goal, four times.** ADR-0020 warns that a blunt gate gets satisfied by deleting content rather than relocating it. `diagnose` and `skill-audit` relocated prose and then read it unconditionally; `prototype` and `vale-config` deleted rules outright that survived nowhere. All four addressed. ## Verification - `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict` — 24 suites, 0 skipped, 0 failed - `bash tests/run-bats.sh` — 325 tests, 0 failures - `pre-commit run --all-files` — 17/17 - `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files` — 16/16, with `apm marketplace check` and `apm pack --check-clean` run against the remote, not skipped - `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` over all 39 skills — rc 0, 0 ERROR/FAIL, SUGGESTION-only - Preload tax measured at **10,498 chars**, max description 390 — both inside budget - Every new test proven non-vacuous by a deliberate mutation of the behaviour it covers **Per-commit sync, stated accurately:** the ten commits from the latest review round each pass `check-plugin-content-sync` in isolation, verified by checking each out in a detached worktree with a clean between. The earlier gitea window (`dfacf05..bedbd1d`, nine commits) does **not** — its mirror was regenerated in one batch at `bbc7300`. An earlier revision of this description claimed the property held for every commit; it does not, and a bisect through that window lands on a red commit. **Squash-merge** to collapse it, or accept that this range is not bisectable. ## Version bump Six plugins and the catalog take a **patch**, not a minor. The branch is **89 commits — 40 `fix` / 30 `refactor` / 12 `docs` / 5 `chore` / 2 `test` — zero `feat`, zero `!`, zero `BREAKING CHANGE`** — and adds no skill, agent, command or hook. (Two earlier revisions of this section cited a stale histogram, most recently 78 commits; the figures above are measured at HEAD.) Both rules this repo ships (`forge/references/version-bump.md`, landing in this PR, and `git-commits/references/conventional-commits-spec.md`) make that a patch, and the catalog set is unchanged at 7 entries. Not settled by that: four published files were removed from the installed tree, three moved, and `caveman` gained `disable-model-invocation`, retiring its old triggers. Under a strict reading those are major-class and currently ship under `refactor:` with no marker. Whether the deployed skill surface is a public contract is written down nowhere — worth deciding, but it outlives this PR. ## Deliberately not in scope #112 (cherry-pick ownership, now resolved in favour of `git-commits`), #113 (`rtk git` normalisation), #116 (research fan-out), #101 (audit-skill merge), #122 (non-spec skill-root files), #123 (no PRD producer) stay open. #117 is the one worth reading: the contract's remedy is to move prose into `references/`, which is exactly where neither the size gate nor Vale looks — and the blind spot is wider than #117 currently records, since there is no root `.vale.ini` at all, so every ADR, `CONTEXT.md` and `README.md` is unlinted too. That blind spot let this branch carry two `level: error` `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` violations into `references/` files it created — `provider-adapter-author/references/provider-matrix.md:31` and `agent-audit/references/finding-criteria.md:95`. Both are reworded in `afadaae`, confirmed by routing each file through the audit's own `vale-wrap.sh` (1 error each before, 0 after). Five further occurrences sit in `references/` files already on `main`; those are the pre-existing corpus and stay with #117, which is the real fix. Also unfixed and not this PR's: `apm install` appends a duplicate `SessionStart` entry to `.claude/settings.json`, so a fresh clone cannot get pre-push green without an edit AGENTS.md warns against. Reproduces identically on `main`. Co-authored-by: Defame1297 <gitea@rkdr.net> Reviewed-on: https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/pulls/129 Co-authored-by: Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP <claude@noreply.git.dev.rkdr.net> Co-committed-by: Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP <claude@noreply.git.dev.rkdr.net> |
||
| 54d7bd80ba |
docs: rule host built-ins out of the routing target universe
Closes the second open design decision on PR #103. The `/compact` finding was recorded as a false positive needing an allowlist or a suppression mechanism. It is neither: the routing universe is the apm marketplace, so a target either resolves to a skill or an agent or it does not resolve, and `/compact`, `/clear` and `/init` are Claude Code slash commands with no counterpart in Copilot CLI or Codex. `.apm/` source compiles for all three, so a vendor-neutral description routing to one is a portability defect and the hard FAIL is a true positive. An allowlist was rejected for a concrete reason, not a stylistic one: it answers a different question ("does this exist on some host?"), it cannot answer that portably from a single source file, and it goes stale the next time a host ships a command — reintroducing the same-commit-two-verdicts failure ADR-0020 already closed for deployed trees. Nothing is blocked today: zero of the 43 descriptions name a host built-in, and an author who needs to mention one writes it un-slashed, which is not route notation and carries no routing claim. Recorded in ADR-0020 and in both author-facing contract references, so the next agent reads the decision rather than "fixing" the gate. ADR: 0020 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 75a13c82f6 |
fix(kyberforge): scope corroboration to a real sentence boundary
A prose-form routing target blocks a commit only when its own sentence names another target that resolves. That makes the sentence splitter part of the ADR-0020 contract rather than an implementation detail, and the naive "period, space, capital" rule got it wrong in both directions: - OVER-SPLIT: `e.g. "..."` is not a sentence end, but the quote looks like a start. The clause was cut in half and the corroborator stranded on the far side, so a genuinely dangling target silently demoted to SUGGESTION — a measurement taken and then discarded, the vacuous-green shape this gate exists to prevent. Seven such splits are live in the current corpus. - UNDER-SPLIT: a sentence opening with a code span or a lowercase skill name was not seen as a start, so two sentences merged and a resolving target vouched for an unresolvable one it never stood beside — a hard FAIL with no escape hatch, which is the exact failure corroboration was added to prevent. The splitter now excludes the five abbreviations that occur in routing prose and admits a backtick or lowercase letter as a sentence opener. Applied byte-identically to all three copies of the shared resolver. Verified zero-delta against the corpus: 37 ERROR / 58 SUGGESTION / 2 dangling before and after, findings byte-identical. The exposure this closes is to the descriptions #99 is about to rewrite, not to the ones already measured — which is why the deferral reason recorded on PR #103 ("can move the documented corpus counts") does not hold and the fix lands here rather than after the retrofit. Three regression tests, one per direction plus the backtick opener, each proven non-vacuous by reverting the splitter alone and watching it go red. Refs: #99 ADR: 0020 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
| 79c9089122 |
docs: make the resolution contract match what the gate actually does
Both AGENTS.md and ADR-0020 said deployed .claude/.agents trees are consulted "only
when no authoring root exists". That stopped being true in
|
|||
| 64ffb9f35a |
docs: make ADR-0020 match what actually shipped, and record what did not
The ADR was written against base commit `f9b919d` and then not updated as the implementation moved, so several of its numbers were measuring one thing and being read as another — the exact conflation the ADR exists to stop, reproduced inside it. Corrections, all reproducible now that each figure states its method: - The preload tax is 23,427 chars / ~5,900 tokens, not 23,612 / ~6,200. - `MAX_WORDS=2770` is a density proxy for the agentskills.io ~5,000-token ceiling, not "2× p90". Neither percentile reaches it: 2× the body-only p90 is 2,698 and 2× the whole-file p90 is 3,052. Reading it as a percentile pairs a whole-file gate against a body-only distribution. - `apm-workflow` is a 421-word body; 554 is its whole-file count. `skill-author` and `agent-author` were 2,623 and 2,582 body words — 2,760 and 2,758 whole-file, which is where "within twelve words of the gate" comes from. Two numbers for one file is the point, and only one of them is what either gate measures. - Every `file:line` citation now says it resolves against `f9b919d`, since this change rewrites most of the cited files. Three things the ADR asserted that no validator implemented are now filed by tier in an exhaustive enforcement table — deterministic, prose-pattern, or auditor judgment — because a rule filed under "Enforcement" that nothing enforces is the failure mode this ADR is most exposed to. The Gotchas entry count moves to SUGGESTION to match the script; the paraphrase FAIL is marked as an auditor's, since semantic equivalence is not pattern-matchable. Two gaps recorded rather than quietly left: - The agent body-gate exemption lives in `agent-audit`'s validator and in the `skill-size-check` hook's `SKILL.md`-only `files:` pattern — *not* in `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`, which measures whatever path it is handed and today reports 900-word body FAILs on `git-orchestrate` (933), `gitea-orchestrate` (1,199) and `apm-orchestrate` (1,080). Agents escape by file pattern, not because the script knows the difference, so widening that pattern would silently enforce a gate this ADR declines to set. - The `skill-audit`/`agent-audit` merge is deferred to #101. This change made the split deeper, not shallower: the dispatch retrofit took them from 3 and 4 reference files to 7 and 8, and their two same-named `description-quality.md` files now differ on 100 of ~120 lines after normalising skill/agent. The merge reopens ADR-0008 and touches every call site in `skill-author`, `agent-author` and `forge`, so it is its own change. #100 carries the dangling-target fixes. AGENTS.md and CONTEXT.md take the same corrections plus the two live setup changes: PyYAML is now a hard requirement rather than an optional accelerator (a fallback that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file it never measured), and `.claude/settings.json`'s `pretty-format-json` exclusion is documented as load-bearing rather than as a tidy-up candidate. LESSONS.md's autofix entry is corrected on its own provenance, which it got wrong in both directions. `git log --date=iso` puts the introducing commit at 18:47 and the fix at 21:54 — three hours, not "weeks" — and `git branch -a --contains` puts the introducing commit on this branch only, not on main. It was manufactured inside the same PR that diagnosed it. The added lesson is that "pre-existing" is a claim about history and history is queryable: a defect found while working on a branch feels inherited, and the feeling is not evidence. Refs: ADR-0020, #99, #100, #101 |
|||
| 4a5c3c0cff |
feat(kyberforge): enforce the ADR-0020 context contract for skills and agents
Skill name+description pairs are preloaded into every session, costing ~6,200 tokens across 39 skills before any skill is invoked. The authoring rules mandated that growth: skill-author:104 and description-quality.md:21 both required padding, while skill-author:102 (the deflating rule) had no FAIL condition behind it. Gates (blocking, no baseline file): - description 250 chars SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL, measured on the folded YAML value - body-only 600 words SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL, independent of the unchanged whole-file 2770-word / 500-line spec backstop - every boundary-clause routing target must resolve to a real skill or agent; catches skill-improve, neuledge-context and gitea-labels - agents take the description gates but deliberately no body gate; a test pins that absence Vale: DescriptionOpener widened to ^This\b, new CompositionNote rule banning architecture notes from descriptions. 10 hits, 0 false positives. Kyberforge's own four skills retrofitted: descriptions 3,364 -> 938 chars (-72%), bodies 8,306 -> 2,487 words (-70%), all via the apm-workflow dispatch pattern. Fixes the skill-improve dangling route and the agent-author misroute to manual review. Also fixes a pre-existing false positive where any line-initial 'read ' was flagged as interactive input, which had already caused two scripts to be rewritten around it. Refs: ADR-0020 |
|||
| 1c6eababb0 |
docs(adr): set a context contract for skill and agent authoring
Every installed skill's name+description is preloaded every session - 23,612 chars (~6,200 tokens) across 39 skills. The authoring rules optimised for triggering reliability with no counter-pressure on size: skill-author:104 and description-quality.md:21 both mandate padding, while skill-author:102 (the rule that would deflate it) is judgment-only and absent from description-quality.md's FAIL conditions. ADR-0020 sets the description shape (trigger + one capability + boundary), two-tier size gates sitting below the unchanged agentskills.io ceilings, a mandatory dispatch pattern for multi-branch bodies, a Gotchas constraint, an agent-side delegation check, and invocation as a design axis. Gates ship blocking with no baseline. Adds five CONTEXT.md glossary entries: preload tax, skill context contract, dispatch body, hand-invoked skill, delegation discipline. Refs: ADR-0020 |