Author SHA1 Message Date
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 971e148e19 docs: amend ADR-0020 and correct the gate reference to match what ships
The ADR said a /slash target behind a route verb takes the follower test; the
implementation decides notation first and skips it. Recorded as a dated amendment
rather than a silent edit, per the ADR-0016/0017 convention.

Its Enforcement table called itself exhaustive 'because the failure this ADR is
most exposed to is a rule filed under Enforcement that no validator implements'.
Three shipped behaviours were missing, including the disable-model-invocation
carve-out that removes two rows. Also de-pins the 'zoom-out is the one carrier'
claim, which caveman falsified, and the stale dangling-target statuses.

gates.md's ERROR row made terminality a conjunct for route notation, telling an
author a form is safe that exits 1. It now documents the references/ Vale blind
spot and its two independent causes -- AGENTS.md trimmed to the operative rule
per the split gates.md itself states -- plus the undocumented skill-frontmatter
hook and the second scope exclusion. CONTEXT.md glosses 'routing target'.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:47:04 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 4011d149bc fix(bin): put five skills' boundaries where the router can read them
grill-me, grill-with-docs, improve-codebase-architecture, tdd and triage each had
their routing boundary written into README.md, which nothing loads at runtime,
while the gate still reported all five descriptions as boundary-less. The
boundaries move into the descriptions; write-docs' clause, which said 'those have
dedicated skills' without naming one, now names them.

research had moved its body out and then read both references unconditionally --
the anti-goal ADR-0020 names, where the word count moves and the per-run context
does not. Both loads are genuinely conditional now, with the topic list and the
four literal sources.md field names inlined, since the provenance validator
matches those literally.

Also restores the promote-the-prototype anti-pattern to prototype's ui.md, which
the gate does not measure, so deleting it bought nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:47:00 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 ae791781c2 fix(git): restore router coverage and commands the retrofit dropped
git-workflow calls itself a router but named two of the six domains it routes to;
the other four appeared nowhere in the file. All six are now named, with a
routing table in the always-loaded body.

git-submodules lost the foreach shell-variable semantics -- only the bare names
survived, though $sm_path and $displaypath differ solely by which directory you
are in. The table is back. Its relocated commands had also dropped the rtk git
prefix its own SKILL.md mandates; 24 of them are re-prefixed. The wider rtk
inconsistency across the plugin stays with #113.

Also restores git-commits' body and footers output fields, git-branches' tag/
branch detection commands, git-worktrees' git config --worktree, pc-run's
ambiguity fallback, git-remotes' git-history boundary, and git-history's pickaxe
triggers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:46:35 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 1a971ee003 fix(gitea): restore routing and sourcing content the retrofit dropped
gitea-issues asserted flatly that a merge never closes an issue, contradicting
gitea-prs' references/merging.md, which documents that closing keywords in
commits landing on the default branch do close one. The qualifier that made the
claim true had been deleted; both sides now agree.

gitea-releases had lost an epistemic hedge and its verification step, leaving
conventions.md asserting unconfirmed tag auto-creation as fact. Nothing in the
research corpus sources it, so the hedge and the verify-afterward instruction are
back rather than upgraded.

Descriptions were cut 50-240 chars under the 400 budget and shed routing with
them: gitea-workflow's boundary named no target, gitea-prs lost the issue/PR
number-space directive the suite is built around at 163/400, gitea-releases lost
its boundary and every trigger. Restored, inside budget. Also restores
delete_branch's hard-refusal strength and gitea-files' Read/Write/Edit pointer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:46:32 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 a8cd5e881d fix(core): strip a BOM before the adapter import check, and split usage exits
Narrowing has_reference to bool(import_lines) meant a UTF-8 BOM hid the import
line, since the BOM is not \s: a CLAUDE.md whose first line is @AGENTS.md failed
with 'no reference to AGENTS.md' and was told to add the line already in front of
it. Decoding is now strict too, so a non-UTF-8 adapter gets an encoding
diagnostic instead of being mangled and then graded on the mangling.

Usage errors move to exit 2. They shared exit 1 with real findings, while the
skill tells the agent to fix any non-zero exit by editing the provider file.

The whole-line import rule is kept deliberately -- accepting an inline @AGENTS.md
would also accept one inside backticks, which is the silent-drop failure the
validator exists to catch -- and the message now says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:46:07 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 00daf285ec fix(kyberforge): tell an unparsable Contributing-files block from an explicit (none)
parse_contributing_files documented that callers depend on None vs [], because a
parse failure returning [] would silently disable the check. Only check 8
honoured it; checks 4/5 (skill-audit) and 3/4 (agent-audit) used a truthiness
test, so an unreadable block disabled them without a word.

Two live corpus entries were skipping this way. A sweep of all 32 sources.md
found 134 entries, exactly 2 parsing to None, both in gitea-files: one heading
carried an inline parenthetical that defeated both regexes, and one (none) was
written without its leading bullet. Also pins EMPTY_SOURCE_KEYS_RE to the two
indents parse_source_keys actually reads.

agent-audit had no INFO tier at all, so it gains one rather than reporting a
check that could not run as a FAIL.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:46:05 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 c232e69645 fix(gates): block a dangling /name route with no preceding verb
The header promised explicit route notation always blocks. It did not: /name
reached extraction only behind a ROUTE_VERB, so a target with no verb before it
was never extracted at all -- exit 0, no output. Taking the SUGGESTION's own
advice ('write it as /name and it will be checked properly') was the one edit
that blinded the gate.

Adds two notation sweeps gated on BOUNDARY_MARKER and routed through _add, plus
a path guard so file paths and URLs are not read as routes. Also excises the
matched pointer span before the REFERENCE_PAST sweep, so a reference file can no
longer exempt itself by its own filename, and guards the agent branch with the
isfile test the skills branch already had.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
2026-08-31 19:45:45 +00:00
Defame1297 5b80f305e9 test(kyberforge): pin the provenance checker's three new behaviours
27a7669 changed validate-provenance.sh in three ways and tested none of
them: the bullet-form parser returning None rather than [] on unparsable
input, the source_keys: [] house-authored declaration, and the stripping
of section annotations off a Research doc path.

All three are checks that previously failed by staying silent, which is
the failure mode this repo keeps rediscovering. Shipping them untested
left nothing to catch a regression back to silence.

The 22 cases assert consequences rather than return values -- that check
8 runs on an unparsable block, that an unresolvable path emits an INFO
naming its slug -- and each was verified against a deliberate mutation
of the behaviour it covers.

Addresses #111.
2026-08-31 08:28:25 +00:00
Defame1297 8599b4a058 chore(release): bump the marketplace version to 0.5.0
0959291 bumped all six plugin versions for the ADR-0020 retrofit but left the
marketplace itself at 0.4.5, so consumers resolving against the marketplace
entry would see no change despite every packaged plugin having moved.
2026-08-31 08:02:49 +00:00
Defame1297 ee248ff5a5 docs: describe the boundary check's new outcomes and de-pin stale counts
The gate spec still described the routing-target check as pass/fail against a
single-arrow clause. It now documents the three outcomes, the hand-invocation
carve-out and the one-arrow rule, so a contributor hitting a SUGGESTION can
tell whether it is a real defect or accepted phrasing.

Both files cited skill counts and source line numbers that go stale on the
next edit and were already wrong; those citations are removed rather than
refreshed.
2026-08-31 08:02:44 +00:00
Defame1297 131b89733b fix(apm-orchestrate): correct the marketplace add-package direction and trim duplication
`apm marketplace package add` rejects a local path — it registers a remote
package reference — but the agent routed local-package registration to it, so
that dispatch could only fail. Local registration is a manifest edit and now
routes to `edit-config`.

The agent also carried its own copy of the `type:` guidance and a numbered
workflow that restated the dispatch procedure below it; both drift from
apm-workflow independently. `type:` correctness is delegated where it belongs,
and the description is rewritten to a trigger plus the apm-install boundary
rather than a restatement of the body.

Addresses #120.
2026-08-31 08:02:38 +00:00
Defame1297 dac9cad912 refactor(kyberforge): move audit guidance out of the per-run rubric load
skill-audit loaded roughly 4,268 words of rubric on every run, most of it
criteria for findings a clean skill never triggers. The auditing guidance moves
into finding-criteria.md, read only when a finding is actually raised, cutting
a clean audit to about 999 words. The named-skill exemption is replaced with
properties, so the rubric stops carrying a list that ages the moment a skill
is renamed.

apm-workflow's `type:` trap sat in one flow while biting several, so it is
promoted to a common gate reachable from all of them; its claim to be
self-contained was untrue once it started routing to apm-install. skill-author's
contract had drifted from body-discipline.md and is realigned, and agent-audit's
field inventory is brought in line with the same split.
2026-08-31 08:02:19 +00:00
Defame1297 e869912374 docs(bin): give every bin skill a README
The bin skills were the only plugin without per-skill READMEs, so a reader
had to open SKILL.md — an agent-facing contract, not an explainer — to learn
what a skill does and when it fires. Each README states purpose, triggers and
boundaries for a human audience, leaving SKILL.md free to stay terse.
2026-08-31 08:02:09 +00:00
Defame1297 03abcffb77 refactor(bin): cut per-invocation load and repair broken skill references
diagnose read its feedback-loops reference unconditionally, so every
invocation paid for guidance most runs never used; the read is conditional
again and the per-invocation cost drops from 1,278 to 831 words. Its HITL
template moves to assets/ because it is copied out, not read as reference.
prototype's two branch flows move into references/ for the same reason —
only one branch is ever taken.

research could not search the codebase it was asked to research without Grep
and Glob. caveman's description had grown into a paragraph where one sentence
carries the trigger. Four references pointed at things that do not exist: a
to-prd skill, a /setup-matt-pocock-skills command, two cross-skill ../ links
that only resolve in the source tree, and two places calling this project's
Gitea host GitHub.

Addresses #114.
2026-08-31 08:02:03 +00:00
Defame1297 1c3af75642 fix(core): make --no-import-syntax actually change the adapter validation
Both branches of the flag reduced to the same expression, so the option was
inert: a caller who asked for the no-import form got the import-form check
anyway and a passing result that meant nothing.

Two further defects in the same validator: --max-lines failed silently when
given a value it could not use, and the Fix text told the agent to edit
AGENTS.md when the offending content is the provider adapter's. The boundary
clauses now name the operation being routed rather than the file type, which
was ambiguous where both skills touch the same file.

Addresses #115.
2026-08-31 08:01:45 +00:00
Defame1297 14af50bc07 fix(git): scope git-workflow's trigger to ambiguity rather than to its domains
git-workflow's description enumerated the six domains it exists to route away
from, so it competed for selection with the very skills it should be handing
off to. It now triggers on the case it actually serves: an interactive request
whose domain is not yet clear.

Also clears frontmatter drift across the plugin and removes duplicated guidance
in pc-run that had diverged from its reference.
2026-08-31 08:01:39 +00:00
Defame1297 8680adf4c0 fix(gitea): make gitea-releases executable and correct misleading domain claims
gitea-releases was the weakest skill in the plugin: no allowed-tools, no
owner/repo resolution, and a checkbox list where a dispatch table belongs, so
an agent reaching it had to guess both its permissions and its inputs. The
id-vs-tag_name trap — deleting by tag name where the API wants the numeric id —
is restored as an explicit Gotcha because it destroys the wrong release
silently.

Elsewhere the `exclusive` flag was documented on the wrong side of the
read/write split, and label data from one instance was presented as though it
were universal, which invites an agent to assume a taxonomy that does not
exist on the target repo. rename_branch was missing from the branch surface.
Reference prose and fences are cleaned up in passing.
2026-08-31 08:01:33 +00:00
Defame1297 b07d54ad7a fix(lint): correct four Vale behaviours the skills described wrongly
Each of these would send a user down a path Vale does not support:

Core options placed under a glob header are not scoped to that glob — Vale
rejects them with E201, so the guidance to nest them produced a config that
will not load. The built-in `Vale` style is compiled in, but Vale still
requires StylesPath to exist on disk before it will run, so the "no StylesPath
needed" shortcut fails. The MDX guidance was inverted: under `[formats]
mdx = md` the mapping is what makes MDX lint at all, and it needs the mdx2vast
prerequisite that was never mentioned. And a spelling rule's `ignore` paths
resolve against StylesPath, not against the rule file's own directory, so the
documented relative paths silently matched nothing.
2026-08-31 08:01:26 +00:00
Defame1297 27a76692b0 fix(kyberforge): stop the provenance checker skipping check 8 on unparsed input
484357a taught the Contributing parser the bullet form, but a block it still
could not parse returned the same empty result as an explicit "(none)", so the
checker read "no contributing files" and skipped check 8 rather than reporting
that it could not tell. Checks 7 and 8 were consequently dead across the whole
git plugin without anything failing.

The parser now distinguishes "declared none" from "could not parse", which
wakes both checks. Because the parser is duplicated between the skill-audit and
agent-audit copies, it is fenced with BEGIN/END markers and a test hashes the
two regions so the copies cannot drift apart again silently.

Addresses #111.
2026-08-31 08:01:18 +00:00
Defame1297 db5a426416 fix(gates): make the ADR-0020 boundary check parse what skills actually write
The routing-target check understood only a single-arrow clause naming a bare
skill, so most real boundary prose was silently skipped rather than verified.
Two of those silences were fail-open: an unrecognised token following a target
dropped that target from the check entirely, and a skill directory with no
SKILL.md still resolved as a valid routing target, so a broken route passed.

Multi-target arrow clauses now draw a SUGGESTION instead of being ignored,
hand-invocation phrasing is carved out so it is not read as a route, and a
dotted filename parses into a new `unparsed` status rather than disappearing.
Three test fixtures had been relying on the SKILL.md-less directory resolving
as a target; they are corrected alongside the check.

Addresses #107, #108, #110.
2026-08-31 08:01:07 +00:00
Defame1297 095929142f chore(release): bump all six plugin versions for the ADR-0020 retrofit
No wave on this branch bumped a version across 56 commits, though
apm-workflow's own configure.md states the policy: bump a package's
apm.yml version: whenever anything reaching its compiled output changes.
All six local packages have substantive .apm/ edits here.

Minor rather than patch. The retrofit rewrote every skill description,
which is the routing surface a caller matches against, and redistributed
bodies into references/. Behaviour is preserved but discovery changes, so
this is more than a fix.

The same file is explicit that versions are per package — editing
plugins/foo/.apm/ never bumps plugins/bar — so this is six independent
bumps that happen to land together, not one release number. Under the
per_package strategy the catalog carries a second copy in
marketplace.packages[], and apm-marketplace-check fails the push when the
two disagree; it cannot see a bump skipped in both, which is the state the
branch was in.

executables.allow is version-pinned by apm's design and moves with
kyberforge, or the SessionStart hook silently stops deploying (ADR-0019).
The comment above that block predicted exactly this; the pre-push suite
caught it when the first bump orphaned the key.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 21:00:58 +00:00
Defame1297 c7c9311d80 docs(gates): refresh the retrofit status to measured state
docs/spec/gates.md still described both ADR-0020 gates as "currently red"
and tabled the pre-retrofit figures: 26 of 39 descriptions and 9 of 39
bodies over their FAIL tier, 2 dangling targets, 58 SUGGESTIONs, and 10
Kyberforge.CompositionNote errors across four gitea-* skills. Measured
now: 0, 0, 0, 33 and 0.

The branch correctly left ADR-0020 itself untouched, since it self-pins
every citation to base commit f9b919d. gates.md carries no such pin, and
AGENTS.md names it three times as the authoritative reasoning layer — so
the shallow doc and the deep doc it defers to asserted opposite facts
about the same two gates, with the stale one telling a reader that an
unrelated one-line fix to a skill is blocked pending a retrofit that is
already done.

Also corrects the apm-orchestrate agent body figure, which drifted from
1,080 to 1,113 across this branch. Its point is that the numbers are live
evidence for leaving that hook's files: pattern alone, so a reader who
re-measures and gets a third value loses the argument.

AGENTS.md gains the second cause of the references/ blind spot: besides
the Kyberforge style being scoped [**/SKILL.md], the
vale-audit-prefilter-skill hook filters on a SKILL.md-only files: pattern,
so widening .vale.ini alone would change nothing. It also no longer
implies the kyberforge wave was the end of the work.

Refs #99 #117
2026-08-30 20:52:06 +00:00
Defame1297 484357a3b9 fix(gates): parse the bullet form of Contributing files
validate-provenance.sh matched Contributing files only as a single inline
line beginning "- **Contributing files:**". Seven skills write it as a
bare "**Contributing files:**" heading above a bullet list, so
parse_contributing_files returned None and checks 4 (contributing file
exists) and 5 (bidirectional source_keys) silently verified nothing on
git-branches, git-remotes, git-submodules, git-workflow, git-worktrees,
gitea-files and gitea-releases.

Those are among the skills this branch changed most — git-branches alone
gained five reference files — and the retrofit's mandatory sources.md
collateral went in unchecked. Demonstrated rather than argued: planting a
nonexistent contributing path in git-remotes yields 0 findings under the
old parser and 1 FAIL under the new one.

Both forms are now accepted. The bullet form is parsed per bullet rather
than by splitting a joined value, because its per-file notes contain
commas that would otherwise be read as path separators. The return type
becomes a list of note-stripped paths, with "(none)" as an empty list and
an absent entry as None, so the two callers no longer re-split a string.

Applied to agent-audit's copy as well. No agent ships a sources.md today,
so it is latent there, but it is the same defect.

This is a third gate blind spot alongside #117 and #118, and was unfiled.
One real defect surfaced immediately and is fixed separately.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:51:56 +00:00
Defame1297 164948a0bc fix(apm-workflow): type: selects processing, it does not validate content
configure.md said apm.yml's `type:` field "constrains what .apm/ may
contain" and that changing it later "does not retroactively validate what
is already on disk" — both implying a validation step that does not exist.
Read against the installed apm-cli 0.28.0: PackageContentType controls how
a package is processed during install/compile, apm_package.py only
enum-checks the declared string, and validate_apm_package() branches on the
structural type derived from files on disk, never on the declared field.
There is no content-vs-type mismatch check anywhere.

The hazard is therefore the opposite of what the wording primed for:
silent omission. A package declaring type: instructions while shipping
.apm/skills/ installs no skill and compiles AGENTS.md only, exits 0, and
reports success having shipped none of its primitives. The rule is now to
verify deployed output rather than the exit code. apm-orchestrate carried
the same wording as a Hard Rule and is corrected in step; its separate
defects stay with #120.

Also refreshes the exemplar figures this branch had re-staled. 264a5db set
them to 3,222 words of references; 6cb47f8 then added 63 words and
invalidated them, and the correction above adds more. Re-measured after
all edits: body 237 and whole-file 304 both still hold, references total
3,416. body-discipline.md's "roughly 3,200" moves with it.

ADR-0020 is deliberately untouched — it self-pins its citations to
f9b919d — as is the git-commits negative example pinned to 5e23250.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:51:45 +00:00
Defame1297 ca744d5d6c fix(vale-config): correct the missing-style failure mode
Gotcha 1 said a style in BasedOnStyles that is not built-in and not
already under StylesPath "finds nothing until vale sync fetches it — a
clean run is not proof anything linted". Reproduced against vale 3.15.2:
that case is a hard `E100 [loadStyles] style '<name>' does not exist on
StylesPath`, exit 2. Nothing is linted and nothing is silent.

Worse, the same commit deleted the Gotcha that was the actual diagnostic —
that Packages and BasedOnStyles are separate keys and a style lints only
once it is in both. So the surviving rule sent a reader staring at E100 to
run `vale sync`, which fetches only what Packages declares and reports
"Synced 0 package(s)" against a BasedOnStyles-only name. The remediation
loop did not terminate. Reproduced end to end.

The genuinely silent case is the reverse — declared in Packages and
synced, but absent from BasedOnStyles — and it is now the one labelled as
such. Testing also turned up that StylesPath must exist as a directory
even when Vale is the only style (E201, exit 2), which was documented
nowhere.

references/configuration-reference.md gains a seven-row resolution matrix,
each row backed by a fixture. Its Frontmatter Scopes section claimed
provenance from the vale.sh research corpus, which contains no frontmatter
material at all; it is house-verified and now says so under its own slug.

Issue #99's wave-3 comment recorded this defect as found and repaired. It
was not — the file was byte-identical to the commit that introduced it, so
nothing here was treated as already correct.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:51:32 +00:00
Defame1297 d2da45f78c fix(gitea-releases): restore the prerelease imperative to the create path
The retrofit left only a descriptive sentence on the loaded path — "Gitea
never infers a prerelease from a -beta/-rc tag name" — and moved the
imperative into references/conventions.md behind a trigger listing semver
naming, release-notes sourcing and release-to-tag relationships. Draft and
prerelease are not in that list, and "cut a v2.0.0-beta.1" is exactly the
request where the caller does not raise the topic, so the rule was
unreachable from the flow that needs it.

Severity comes from the repair path: the MCP surface has create, get,
get_latest, list and delete only — there is no update or edit tool. A
release published without is_pre_release can only be corrected by
delete_release plus a fresh create, and get_latest_release points
consumers at the beta meanwhile. Neither SKILL.md nor call-signatures.md
said so anywhere.

The flags are now set explicitly on every create, the missing update tool
and its delete-and-recreate consequence are stated in the body, and the
semver pass-through rule stranded behind the same trigger is promoted
alongside it. call-signatures.md now cites the deployed tool description
as direct evidence that get_latest_release excludes drafts, while keeping
the prerelease half hedged — that remains unconfirmed.

Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:51:22 +00:00
Defame1297 8982ac58b7 fix(gitea-labels-milestones): read exclusive per label, never infer it
SKILL.md called `exclusive` "an org-labels-only flag" and concluded that
applying a Kind/*, Priority/* or Status/* label "must replace the one
already there, not stack on it". Live `list_repo_labels` on this repo
returns `exclusive` on every REPO label: all seven Kind/* plus
Compat/Breaking are false, while Priority/*, Reviewed/* and Status/* are
true. So the field is not org-only, and the replace rule would strip a
valid Kind/* label — a destructive write from a false premise.

The nuance kept: label_write's `exclusive` parameter genuinely is
annotated org-only, so that row was schema-accurate. The error was
generalising a write-parameter restriction into a claim about where the
field exists. The row is qualified rather than deleted.

The rule is now per-label: where exclusive is true the server drops the
sibling itself, so do not pre-remove; where it is false the label is
legitimately stackable.

Also fixes the org-label fallback, which treated any list_org_labels
failure as proof the owner is a user account with no org pool and said so
was "an answer, not an error to report". Under the token scopes this skill
declares the call fails with required=[read:organization] before any
org-vs-user determination is made, so a capability gap was being reported
as an absent label. Scope errors are now distinguished and reported.

Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:51:12 +00:00
Defame1297 dd1981db80 fix(gitea-issues): list_issues does have type and milestones on v1.7.0
SKILL.md's headline Gotcha said `list_issues` "has no `type` filter", and
references/issues.md stated in bold that neither `type` nor `milestones`
exists, "despite both appearing in api-reference.md". Both parameters are
present on the deployed gitea-mcp v1.7.0 and both work: `type: "issues"`
returns only issues, `type: "pulls"` only PRs, and `milestones` filters by
name. Unfiltered, the same window returns them interleaved, so the mixing
the Gotcha describes is real — only the stated remedy was wrong.

This mattered most in gitea-workflow's no-args check-in, which lists open
issues through this skill and so reported PRs under "Open Issues" while
the skill forbade the one-parameter fix. The list flow now passes
`type: "issues"`.

references/sources.md recorded the absence as a live-verification win over
stale research docs; it now records that the earlier check was superseded
by v1.7.0, since drift runs in both directions. gitea-prs cited the same
parameter as its canonical drift example and no longer does — no
replacement example was substituted, because the obvious candidate was not
verified in this pass.

Also defaults label writes to `add_labels`: `replace_labels` clears every
label not in the array, and per-label exclusivity makes blanket replacement
destructive for a non-exclusive scope.

Verified live against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, read-only calls.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:51:02 +00:00
Defame1297 c5b207aee8 fix(git-branches): restore merging.md's provenance back-reference
references/sources.md credits atlassian-gitflow-tutorial with contributing
the `--no-ff` requirement on Gitflow supporting-branch merges to
references/merging.md, and merging.md:14 does carry that claim — but the
file's own source_keys listed only context7-git-htmldocs, so the chain was
one-directional.

Surfaced by repairing validate-provenance.sh's Contributing-files parser
in the same series; this skill was one of seven whose sources.md the old
parser could not read, so checks 4 and 5 had never run against it.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:50:51 +00:00
Defame1297 93d3263f8c fix(pc-run): rebind the clean gate and fixer-hook rule to every branch
SKILL.md tells a dispatching agent to read the matching reference file
"and no other". The retrofit moved the `pre-commit clean` confirmation
gate out of the always-loaded body into references/clean.md, but
references/failure-patterns.md — loaded by the diagnosis route, not the
clean route — prescribes `pre-commit clean` with no gate at all. So "why
is this hook failing" could wipe the machine-wide cache at
~/.cache/pre-commit for every repo without asking.

The gate returns to the body, where every branch loads it, and is
restated at the point of use in failure-patterns.md. It is its own
section rather than a Gotchas bullet because folding it in pushed the
Gotchas ratio to 41%, whose only suggested remedy is moving it back to
references/ — the move that caused this.

The fixer-hook rule had the same shape: reachable only behind "if the
cause is not obvious from the output", which is false precisely when
pre-commit prints `- files were modified by this hook`. The fix
(`git add -u && git commit`) and the prohibition on `pre-commit install -f`
are now unconditional, and the two weakened pointers that stranded them
are restored.

Found by an independent review of this branch.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:50:45 +00:00
Defame1297 ddf85518c7 fix(git-worktrees): correct the remote-tracking and repair claims
The dispatch row "Create tracking a remote branch" prescribed
`git worktree add <path> <remote>/<branch>`. Per git-worktree(1) the
tracking DWIM fires only when <commit-ish> is a bare branch name that is
NOT found locally, no -b/-B/--detach is given, and exactly one remote has
a matching name; only then is it equivalent to
`git worktree add --track -b <branch> <path> <remote>/<branch>`.

An explicit <remote>/<branch> is found, so that precondition fails and no
branch is created: the result is a detached HEAD with no upstream. Commits
made in it become unreachable once the worktree is removed or HEAD moves,
and push needs an explicit refspec. Only the -d row was flagged detached.

The table now names --track -b as the always-correct form, keeps the bare
name shortcut with its precondition stated, and adds a Never row for the
<remote>/<branch> spelling. The single-remote and checkout.defaultRemote
preconditions move into the body, since a reader who trusts the table
never follows the reference pointer.

Also corrects `git worktree repair`: the no-argument form is the only
cwd-dependent one, and `repair <path>...` runs from any worktree. The
claim that running it from the wrong directory "reports nothing and fixes
nothing" has no basis in the manual and is removed.

Found by an independent review of this branch.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 20:50:36 +00:00
Defame1297 6cb47f81f6 fix(apm-workflow): surface the registries precondition in compile/install
SKILL.md says the apm experimental enable registries precondition
applies "anywhere — configure, install or publish," but only
configure.md actually carried it. compile.md's Publish flow and
install.md's dependency resolution can both hit a named registry and
silently no-op with no error if the precondition was never run, yet
neither file mentioned it — contradicting the skill's own promise that
each reference file is self-contained for its concern. Add a one-line
cross-reference to configure.md's Gotchas in each.

Found by an independent post-closure audit of #99 (agent-audit +
skill-audit re-run against every changed skill/agent).
2026-08-30 19:31:21 +00:00
Defame1297 0c0df46ac9 fix(gitea-releases): hedge the unconfirmed tag-deletion direction
The retrofit (dfacf05) collapsed a Gotcha into a bidirectional claim —
"deleting a tag never deletes the release wrapping it" — that
references/call-signatures.md never confirms; that file explicitly
marks the reverse direction unconfirmed and "the more dangerous
direction to get wrong." State only the confirmed direction (deleting
a release doesn't delete its tag) and flag the reverse as unconfirmed
with a verification step, on a destructive, irreversible operation.

Found by an independent post-closure audit of #99 (agent-audit +
skill-audit re-run against every changed skill/agent).
2026-08-30 19:31:18 +00:00
Defame1297 59aaec4ed6 fix(gitea-branches): repoint dangling overview.md citation
references/commits.md cited overview.md as the authority for a
scope-gating claim, but no such file exists in this skill's package —
the only overview.md is an external research doc not shipped with the
skill. Repoint to branches.md's own Token scope section, which states
and confirms the same principle, and drop the unverifiable
write:repository enumeration detail no file in this skill actually
makes.

Found by an independent post-closure audit of #99 (agent-audit +
skill-audit re-run against every changed skill/agent).
2026-08-30 19:31:15 +00:00
Defame1297 92ba9abe7c fix(diagnose): restore skill-root-relative script path
00c1e6b (the ADR-0020 retrofit of diagnose) moved a bullet referencing
scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh out of SKILL.md and into the new
references/feedback-loops.md, and in the move flipped the correct
skill-root-relative path into an incorrect parent-relative one
(../scripts/...) -- despite that commit's own message claiming to fix
"a script path that did not resolve." References in this skill are
written relative to the skill root regardless of which file carries
them, matching the convention used throughout SKILL.md.

Found via an independent post-closure audit of issue #99; validated
clean via skill-audit afterward.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 17:45:56 +00:00
Defame1297 38efd2be67 fix(skills): collapse verb-enumerated descriptions to one capability clause
An independent audit of the ADR-0020 retrofit (issue #99) found that
git-submodules, git-worktrees, and gitea-files each collapsed their
description length correctly during retrofit but left the capability
clause as a verb enumeration (e.g. "Create, list, lock, move, remove,
prune, or repair") instead of ADR-0020's required single clause. The
deterministic char-count gate can't catch this — it's a qualitative
rubric violation the retrofit commits' own messages never claimed to
address, only measurable length/word-count fixes.

Validated clean via skill-audit and skill-size-check after the fix;
boundary clauses and routing targets left untouched.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 17:45:50 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 bdff6fdb3c refactor(bin): make caveman hand-invoked only
Sets `disable-model-invocation: true`, so the host withholds caveman from
the model-visible skill listing. It stops paying preload tax and can only
be reached by typing /caveman.

The reason is not the 287 characters. caveman's description was almost
entirely a trigger list -- "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "less
tokens", "be brief" -- and "be brief" is a false-positive magnet: a user
asking for brevity wants short answers, not dropped articles and
`Respond terse like smart caveman`. Removing the skill from the router
deletes the bad trigger. User's call, made explicitly.

Safe to flag because the flag also hard-blocks the Skill tool, so any
inbound route from another skill would break. Re-checked all 39
descriptions and bodies after four waves of retrofit rewrites: every
mention of caveman is documentation, research notes or the lockfile.
Nothing routes to it.

The description is rewritten as human-facing text, since it is no longer
a routing surface -- it now says how to turn the mode on and off rather
than listing phrases for a reader that can no longer see it.

The two remaining SUGGESTIONs are #108: the boundary-clause check fires on
hand-invoked skills, which ADR-0020 contractually exempts. Advisory, and
not to be "fixed" in the skill.

Preload tax 10,002 -> 9,732 chars across 37 model-visible skills.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 17:04:45 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 b25412bf39 docs: record that the ADR-0020 corpus is clean, and what the gates still miss
Wave 4 closed the last three FAILs, so the session rule no longer describes
a grandfathered set: all 39 skills clear both tiers, 0 descriptions over 400
chars and 0 bodies over 900 words. Preload tax 21,033 -> 10,201 chars
(~2,550 tokens), under the 12,000 success criterion in #99.

The rule now says what that changes for the reader: nothing is grandfathered,
so the gates bite on first commit rather than waiting for a retrofit.

Also names the second blind spot, found this wave. The Kyberforge Vale style
is scoped [**/SKILL.md], so every references/ file is unlinted -- and the
contract's own remedy is to move prose into references/, which moves it out
of the prose gate's reach. forge's retrofit relocated ~900 words that way and
the moved prose carried a rule violation Vale would have caught in a SKILL.md.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 16:42:59 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 79c60715dc fix(gates): restore byte-identity of the shared ADR-0020 boundary resolver
915eb09 rewrote the bare-arrow carve-out comment in scripts/skill-size-check.sh
without pasting the block over the two other copies, so the resolver stood at
764 lines in the hook and 755 in both audit validators.
tests/test-adr0020-contract.sh exists to catch exactly this and did -- it was
the regression behind that suite's failure, and I reported the suite green
after 915eb09 without re-running it.

No behaviour changes: the drift was comment-only. Restoring identity keeps the
invariant the test enforces, which matters because the three copies are the
only thing making the hook and the two validators agree on what a boundary
target is.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 16:42:51 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 264a5dbd67 docs(kyberforge): refresh the apm-workflow exemplar figures after its retrofit
body-discipline.md and contract.md both cite apm-workflow by hard number
as the reference dispatch shape, and instruct authors to calibrate against
its body word count. The retrofit in 1e4aab5 moved every one of those
figures: body 421 -> 237, whole-file 554 -> 304, references 3,006 ->
3,222. Measured, not estimated.

The quoted closing line was stale too -- it now carries a continuation
clause, so it is quoted with an ellipsis rather than as a full sentence.

These are positive exemplars in live guidance, so they are refreshed
rather than pinned. That is the opposite treatment from the git-commits
negative example in the same file, which is pinned to 5e23250 precisely
so it keeps describing the pre-retrofit state. ADR-0020 carries the same
figures and is deliberately left alone: it self-pins every citation to
base commit f9b919d, and refreshing it would destroy the record of what
the decision was taken against.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 16:31:43 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 aa982b9d26 refactor(kyberforge): retrofit apm-install to the ADR-0020 contract
Description 514 -> 213 chars, Gotchas 5 entries/47% -> 2 entries/17%.
Body 350 -> 397 words: three Gotchas fold into the steps they gate, and
the repairs below add back what the fold dropped.

Cuts the second trigger register, the runtime enumeration (still named in
the body and README) and the enumeration inside the boundary clause.

Fixes four defects the first pass introduced:

- The mirror bullet claimed the piped one-liner "ignores" VERSION and
  GITHUB_URL. The installer reads both from the environment and its own
  usage header documents VERSION working through the pipe. The real
  constraint is that an air-gapped host cannot reach aka.ms, so the
  script must be on disk. Also corrects the variable names --
  APM_RELEASE_BASE_URL is the mirror base, GITHUB_URL is the Enterprise
  host.
- "If apm --version already answers, skip to Step 2" was unconditional on
  intent, so a pin or upgrade request routed past the only pin
  instruction in the skill. Now gated on intent.
- The PEP 668 rule was demoted to post-failure recovery, leaving a
  routing rule that sent a Debian box into a command that hard-fails.
  The prohibition is back on the pip bullet, before the choice.
- The apm-is-not-a-runtime Gotcha lost its operative clause. The two
  step headings cited as carrying it already existed pre-retrofit, so
  nothing had replaced it and nothing stated when Step 2 is required.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 16:31:33 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 4aab9d327c refactor(kyberforge): retrofit forge to the ADR-0020 contract
Description 648 -> 387 chars, body 1093 -> 541 words. This was the last
body FAIL in the 39-skill corpus.

The body was not trimmed to fit. forge routes four artifact types that a
single invocation classifies between, so the contract requires a dispatch
table plus the gates common to every route, with each route self-contained
in references/. Adds references/author-routes.md (skill and agent),
references/apm-routes.md (plugin and marketplace entry) and
references/version-bump.md. Skill and agent share one file: they differ on
one axis only, which audit skill verifies the result.

Fixes three defects the first pass introduced or relocated:

- references/apm-routes.md claimed `apm audit` "already runs inside
  apm-workflow's own flow" and told the agent to confirm it ran clean.
  apm-workflow dispatches audit as its own row; the configure and
  marketplace rows never reach it. That was the only completion check
  these routes had, and it could never be satisfied. Replaced with a
  manual read-back the agent performs itself.
- "Read only the reference file" forbade the multi-artifact case the same
  body documents two lines later, and ADR-0011 records eight artifacts
  authored in one pass.
- The announce gate became a closing gate, reachable only after the
  invocation it was meant to precede. Moved to the end of Step 2.

Also restores the artifact enumeration to the plugin row, normalises to
bare unnamespaced skill names per AGENTS.md, adds a dispatch fallback for
artifacts matching no row, and corrects three provenance entries -- one
asserted a contribution that did not happen.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 16:31:23 +00:00
Defame1297andClaude Opus 5 1e4aab53a7 refactor(kyberforge): retrofit apm-workflow to the ADR-0020 contract
Description 817 -> 324 chars, body 421 -> 237 words, Gotchas 6 -> 2.

The five capability clauses, the second trigger register and the prose
boundary form go; one trigger clause, the indirect trigger and one
boundary clause remain. Four of six Gotchas move into the flow file that
every branch needing them already loads.

Two stay in the always-loaded body because a dispatch body must carry the
gates common to every branch, not just the dispatch table: the MCP secret
indirection rule, and the `apm experimental enable registries`
precondition. The first pass moved registries into references/configure.md
alone, which stranded it -- references/compile.md documents publishing to a
registry and references/install.md resolves dependencies through one, and
neither points at configure.md. Declaring a registry without the
precondition is a silent no-op, so the failure had no signal.

Also drops an unsourced claim the compression pass introduced (that apm
checks `type:` going forward -- no source supports it), corrects the MCP
rationale to install *or* runtime per configuration.md:98, and repoints
two apm-orchestrate back-references that pointed at body Gotchas which had
moved.

Refs #99

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MWb5RQgCL1ye7cGp2RPb2u
2026-08-30 16:31:11 +00:00
Defame1297 915eb09ae2 docs(scripts): record that the bare-arrow carve-out is now unexercised
The comment justified the ADR-0020 compressed-form gate with diagnose's
process chain 'fix -> regression-test', which without the gate read as a
route to a non-existent regression-test skill. Issue #99 cut that chain
when it retrofitted the description, so the gate now produces an
identical verdict corpus-wide whether it is applied or not.

Keeping the branch. It guards against prose no one has written yet, any
new process chain re-arms it, and the bare-arrow rule it sits on is the
sole extractor for three real targets in kyberforge's audit skills, all
written unbackticked. Unexercised is not the same as unnecessary — the
comment just needed to stop citing evidence that no longer exists.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:51:43 +00:00
Defame1297 d8dfba958c docs(agents): correct the ADR-0020 gate counts after wave 3
Three skills still exceed a FAIL tier, all in kyberforge, down from ten
descriptions and two bodies. No routing target dangles any more, and the
test suite now pins that set as empty rather than tracking a backlog.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:07:17 +00:00
Defame1297 7e80c09b13 fix(kyberforge): a dispatch table satisfies the reference-wiring rule
body-discipline.md required every reference load to use the literal
'If X, read references/file.md' form and called anything else a generic
pointer. ADR-0020's own cited dispatch exemplar, apm-workflow, uses a
bare table plus one closing line, so an author could not satisfy both --
and the rule reliably produced duplication in exactly the bodies the
contract exists to keep short.

Resolves #109 with its option 1: a table row already pairs a condition
with a target, so where a body dispatches, the table is the wiring. The
literal form is what a body needs when it loads a reference without a
table.

Two corrections to the issue as filed. There is no Vale conflict --
PaddingPhrase.yml only matches 'see references/ for more info' and never
fired on the exemplar, so this is a one-file prose fix and no rule
changes. And gitea-workflow carried the predicted duplication: a
three-row table restated underneath as three conditionals. Removed, body
227 -> 148 words.

Closes #109
2026-08-30 15:07:16 +00:00
Defame1297 ff187ef9fc refactor(lint): retrofit vale-run to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 654 -> 294 chars, Gotchas 36% -> 19%. Body 698 -> 642 words:
up from the first pass, because a clean-context audit found four defects
whose fixes are net-additive text.

The suppression-markup warning covered only one of the two paths that
write it -- the list is case-based, so a recurring false positive goes
straight to step 3 and never read step 2's warning. Hoisted above both.

The CI-failure trigger, which the description advertises, had no path to
the file holding its answer: the negative diagnosis 'if the alerts are
warnings, Vale is not what failed the build' survived only in
troubleshooting.md, which no CI-entered invocation loads. An agent would
confidently prescribe --no-exit for a failure Vale never caused.

The description had lost every prose-domain word -- no 'prose', no
'linter' -- while vale-config kept all of them, so 'check prose style'
routed to the wrong skill of the pair.

Accepts two soft SUGGESTIONs rather than dropping restored content;
neither fails the gate.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:07:16 +00:00
Defame1297 45cd26045a refactor(lint): retrofit vale-config to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 657 -> 244 chars, body 504 -> 342 words, Gotchas 50% -> 24%.
The 50% was the worst ratio in the corpus and a real inverted body, not
the denominator artefact the ratio usually flags: half the body was a
Gotchas section doing duty as reference material.

A clean-context audit caught the split leaving a false statement behind.
Gotcha 1's kernel lost the qualifier that only package styles need
fetching, so it asserted that any style vale sync has not fetched fails
-- contradicting the same file twice, since the built-in Vale style and
any committed custom style are never fetched. An agent adding a custom
style would have added a spurious Packages entry and broken vale sync
outright. The qualifier is restored in the body rather than behind a
fourth reference pointer.

Also corrects the moved fixture's framing, which tabulated a control row
under a heading claiming it came from a multi-line fixture.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:07:15 +00:00
Defame1297 c59e4bf0c5 refactor(core): retrofit provider-adapter-author to the ADR-0020 contract
Description 833 -> 239 chars, body 370 -> 387 words, Gotchas 41% -> 20%.
The file-type enumeration moves to a new references/provider-matrix.md;
the composition note was already in README.md.

Three defects a clean-context audit found, all fixed:

The 'never edits AGENTS.md' prohibition had become a justification clause
on the false branch of a conditional, so the common path never read a
sentence binding it. That matters because the bundled validator's own
remediation text tells the agent to move content into AGENTS.md, so a
size FAIL actively invited the prohibited edit. Restored as a standing
imperative, plus a counter at the step where the trap fires.

A Gotcha asserted that validate-adapter.sh fails without
--no-import-syntax. The flag is a no-op -- both branches reduce to the
same expression. Reverted to an instruction; the script defect is #115.

The boundary clauses used pronouns to dodge the #110 regex, and 'Not
auditing it' resolved to CLAUDE.md as readily as to AGENTS.md -- routing
'audit my CLAUDE.md' to a skill whose own description declines it.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:06:50 +00:00
Defame1297 f0526b310d refactor(core): retrofit agentsmd-audit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 944 -> 322 chars, Gotchas 36% -> 22%. The composition note
moves to README.md.

Restores the hand-edit trigger, which a clean-context audit found had no
other caller: agentsmd-author owns the post-authoring invocation, but a
hand-edit has no author skill in the loop, so nothing invoked the audit
at all. It survived only in README.md, which neither the router nor the
invoked agent loads. That is the path on which a human pastes a
credential into AGENTS.md.

The first pass dropped it against a measured budget of '~9 spare chars'.
The real cost was ~49, and 250 is the SUGGESTION tier, not a ceiling --
the gate fails at 400. Ships at 322 with one advisory line.

Names the three audit dimensions in the capability clause, recovering
routing for 'does my AGENTS.md leak credentials', and qualifies the
'is this AGENTS.md safe to commit' phrasing, whose pronoun had no
antecedent inside the quoted string.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:06:49 +00:00
Defame1297 e42c055294 refactor(core): retrofit agentsmd-author to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 960 -> 244 chars, body 470 -> 452 words, Gotchas 36% -> 22%.
Both composition notes move to README.md, which already carried them.

Four of five Gotchas were paraphrases of the step below them and were
deleted with their force folded back into that step. A clean-context
audit overturned the fifth deletion: the provider-file prohibition was
strictly broader than Step 4, so it was never a paraphrase, and Step 4's
'don't rewrite it yourself' is attached to the if-duplicates branch. With
Write and Edit granted, a provider file that was merely stale had nothing
forbidding an edit. Restored as an unconditional Gotcha, read before any
step writes.

Also restores a concrete indirect trigger. The retrofit had replaced two
with the meta-statement 'even when they don't name the file', which
claims an indirect trigger exists rather than being one -- and users
asking to document a repo for AI tools have no reason to know the
filename.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:06:48 +00:00
Defame1297 00c1e6b305 refactor(bin): retrofit diagnose to the ADR-0020 context contract
Body 1126 -> 808 words, clearing the FAIL tier, and description 290 ->
220 chars. Phase 1's depth moves to references/feedback-loops.md; the
six-phase spine stays in the body, since a linear procedure is not a
dispatch case.

The description rewrite was not originally in scope, which was an error:
adding a mandatory boundary clause to a 290-char description cannot land
under 400. The dropped capability chain was also inaccurate -- it named
'minimise' as a phase that does not exist while omitting the one phase
the body calls 'This is the skill'.

A clean-context audit found no text lost but three reachability defects,
all fixed: content stranded behind an inverted trigger, Phase 2's
reproduction-rate threshold defined only in a file that path never
loaded, and a script path that did not resolve from the file carrying it.
The two reference files are merged into one, since the split is what
created the first two.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:06:26 +00:00
Defame1297 f03bfa8d24 refactor(bin): retrofit prototype to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 426 -> 286 chars, with a boundary clause added. The body was
already compliant at 467 words and is untouched.

A clean-context audit caught the first pass trading away the LOGIC
branch's routing vocabulary for characters it did not need to save: both
'data model' and 'business logic' had gone, though LOGIC.md defines its
own scope with exactly those words. Restored, so 'does this data model
feel right?' routes here again.

Accepts 286 over the 250 target -- the hard tier is 400, and the
alternative was leaving half the dispatch reachable by one phrase.

Leaves LOGIC.md and UI.md at the skill root; moving them into references/
is tracked as #114.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:06:25 +00:00
Defame1297 ee6b04061a refactor(bin): retrofit research to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 583 -> 231 chars and body 854 -> 519 words. Deletes the
neuledge-context boundary clause outright: commit 6146120 deleted that
skill and no skill has owned MCP-server installation since. That was the
last dangling routing target in the corpus.

Removes META.md, which file-structure.md:20 forbids at a skill root. Its
when: field duplicated the description and its references: entry pointed
at .agents/skills/context7-mcp/SKILL.md, which does not exist.

Restores two rules a clean-context audit found had lost their force: the
starting-URLs branch in step 3, which the retrofit had reduced to a
condition with no behaviour, and the references/file-format.md pointer at
step 6. The second matters downstream -- validate-provenance.sh parses
sources.md with anchored regexes and check 8 short-circuits silently when
the Status field is absent, so a sources.md written from step 6 alone
broke the provenance chain with no error anywhere.

Rewrites steps 4-5 as serial WebFetch reads. They mandated spawning
subagents that allowed-tools never granted; no tool was added because the
name differs across the three compile targets. Tracked as #116.

Updates the two test pins and the eval case that asserted the dead route.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 15:06:23 +00:00
Defame1297 a2ebdafc5e fix(skill-audit): pin the stale worked example and state its reachability precondition
The body-discipline rubric cited git-commits as it stood before the ADR-0020
retrofit -- twelve Gotchas, 387/1102 words, line numbers :31-:52. Every
figure was correct for that version and none survives in the current file,
so the example is now anchored to commit 5e23250 and marked not to be
refreshed against HEAD.

More than staleness: row four called the secrets Gotcha a paraphrase FAIL
because step 2 restated it. Wave 2 followed that reasoning, deleted the
always-loaded copy, and left the amend branch able to commit a credential
unchecked -- dispatch loads exactly one flow file. The paraphrase rule now
carries its missing precondition: delete a restating Gotcha only when the
surviving copy is reachable from every branch that needs it, and relocate
a multi-branch safety gate into the body rather than dropping it.
2026-08-30 13:22:55 +00:00
Defame1297 afbeaff56b docs(agents): correct the ADR-0020 gate counts after the git retrofit
Descriptions over the FAIL tier 19 -> 10, bodies 7 -> 2. This line is
always-loaded context, so a stale count misleads every session.
2026-08-30 13:14:00 +00:00
Defame1297 3cd3f33706 refactor(pc-author): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 475 -> 213 chars, body 680 -> 212 words. Create and modify
become self-contained flow files behind a dispatch table, since the two are
mutually exclusive on whether the config already exists.

Passed its clean-context audit with no must-fix findings.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 15ff7417b9 refactor(pc-run): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 477 -> 211 chars, body 736 -> 367 words. Install, autoupdate,
and clean become flow files behind the Route table.

The audit found no route for 'hooks aren't running': the only pointer to
failure-patterns.md sat inside the failure path, but when hooks never fire
the manual run succeeds, so the request fell to the ambiguity default and
was masked. Restores the disclosure that install -f is not reversible by
uninstall.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 7cb8e95379 refactor(git-history): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 450 -> 266 chars, body 1044 -> 462 words. The bisect procedure
moves to references/bisect.md.

The boundary clause read 'not writing or rewriting commits', which
disclaimed the cherry-pick and revert this skill's own Step 3 executes; it
now excludes authoring and rebasing only. Adds 'backport' so cherry-pick is
reachable by natural language at all, accepting 266 chars against a 250
soft target and a 400 ceiling.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 261e5b5491 refactor(git-submodules): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 480 -> 248 chars, body 1011 -> 347 words. The single
submodules.md splits into setup-and-update, urls-and-config, and removal.

Restores three regressions the first pass introduced: 'repointing' as the
trigger for the URL branch, which had none while the boundary clause
steered those queries to git-remotes; clone and absorbgitdirs in the output
enum, which dispatch still routed to; and status --cached, the flag that
makes the pre-commit pointer gate verifiable.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 3c74beb280 refactor(git-workflow): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 566 -> 249 chars, body 644 -> 398 words, Gotchas 12 -> 2. The
eight organisational hard rules move to references/hard-rules.md.

Its load trigger enumerates operations rather than rule topics: the first
draft keyed on 'commit message form', which left the atomicity and
working-state rules unreachable when a caller supplied a conventional
message. Also promotes the destructive-op confirmation ahead of the
orchestrator invocation, which it previously followed.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 38eb0745b7 refactor(git-remotes): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 582 -> 237 chars, body 1217 -> 290 words. The single remotes.md
splits into config, fetch, push, and pull flow files.

Restores the confirm: true token to the force-push gate -- it is the git
plugin's cross-skill contract, gated on by git-orchestrate and git-branches.
Moves push.md's worked example off main, which the skill's own Step 1
refuses, and restores the never-bare---force directive.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 3dd5387671 refactor(git-worktrees): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 592 -> 248 chars, body 756 -> 515 words, Gotchas 8 -> 4.

The audit found the dispatch table had no row for a worktree on an
existing local branch, so that request fell to the adjacent -B row, which
resets the branch to HEAD and discards its commits. Non-destructive create
is now the first row and -B names its own destructiveness. Adds the missing
lock/unlock row and repair's run-from constraint.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 0fde892f20 refactor(git-branches): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 612 -> 273 chars, body 1124 -> 457 words. Branch patterns,
operations, merging, comparison, and the orchestrator contract move to
references/.

Corrects rebase routing in four places: this skill sent rebase to
git-history, which carries no rebase content and disclaims it. Rebase is
git-commits'; cherry-pick and revert stay git-history's. Drops a Step 3
gate on a rebase flow this skill does not have.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 f3b4860e14 refactor(git-commits): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 724 -> 214 chars, body 1102 -> 343 words, Gotchas 12 -> 3.
Create, rewrite, and cherry-pick flows move to self-contained references/
files behind a dispatch table.

The audit caught that moving the secret scan into the create flow left the
amend/squash path with no check in its loaded context; it is now a gate
common to every flow. Also re-homes the interactive-rebase reflog warning
git-history dropped, since this skill owns rebase.
2026-08-30 13:10:53 +00:00
Defame1297 bbc73008a3 chore(gitea): regenerate the flat content mirror after the ADR-0020 retrofit
Generated output, not authored content: scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh --all.
Claude Code has no .apm/ awareness, so this compiled mirror must track .apm/ or
the check-plugin-content-sync pre-push hook reports drift.

Deferred to a single commit at the end of the wave on purpose. sync_dir runs
rm -rf before every copy, so running it while seven agents were editing the
same plugin would have raced them; agents were told not to sync for that reason.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:42:20 +00:00
Defame1297 bedbd1d872 refactor(gitea-workflow): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 1012 -> 347 chars, body 582 -> 170 words, Gotchas 3 entries -> 1 at
22.9% of body. Clears the description FAIL and all four Vale CompositionNote
errors -- the last carriers in the corpus, so that rule now fires nowhere.

Cut the 'human-facing entry point and router' architecture note, the /gitea
migration history and the six-skill composition list; all were already in the
README or the routing table.

Split three mutually exclusive flows into a dispatch table keyed on invocation
shape, each branch self-contained in references/: status-checkin.md,
number-resolution.md, skill-index.md. Report stays in the body as the gate
common to every branch; each branch's own format moved to its file. The old
Step 1-4 numbering presented three alternatives as a sequence.

The description grew from an intermediate 283 chars on purpose: that draft had
dropped flow 3's trigger entirely, leaving the domain-routing index -- a third
of the skill -- reachable only through a tail clause whose grammatical subject
was the request rather than the skill. Both gates were green over that.

Boundary clauses are one arrow per target, so both resolve (#107: the resolver
extracts only the first target per clause and reports 1 of 1 on a clause naming
two). The local-git exclusion keeps its wording but drops the route to
git-workflow, which would not resolve in a gitea-only install.

Known residual: the dispatch conditions are stated twice, as a table and as
literal conditionals. That is #109 -- body-discipline.md mandates the literal
form while the ADR's cited exemplar, apm-workflow, uses a bare table plus one
summary line. Fixing it here would settle that contradiction in a skill rather
than in the spec, so it rides with #109.

Refs #99, #107, #109
2026-08-30 12:42:04 +00:00
Defame1297 b8c36c36f6 docs(agents): correct the ADR-0020 gate counts to measured state
The bullet is always-loaded context, and all three of its numbers had gone
stale as the issue #99 retrofit landed. Measured now: 19 of 39 descriptions and
7 of 39 bodies over their FAIL tier, down from 26 and 9; one dangling routing
target left (research -> neuledge-context), down from two.

Kyberforge.CompositionNote fired 10 errors across four gitea-* skills and now
fires nowhere -- those four were the only carriers and all four have been
retrofitted. The 'check both gates' advice stays: skill-size-check still does
not cover the Vale half, and any new description can reintroduce the rule.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:35:48 +00:00
Defame1297 23b843a311 test: drop the gitea-labels pin now the retrofit removed that target
tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh pinned the corpus dangling set as exactly
{gitea-labels, neuledge-context} and tests/test-skill-size-check.sh probed both
individually. The gitea-issues retrofit cut the composition sentence whose
'>'-folded scalar produced 'gitea-labels- milestones', so that target no longer
exists and both suites went red.

EXPECTED_DANGLING is now {neuledge-context} and the gitea-issues probe is
removed rather than skipped, per the rule the probe file states about itself: a
probe whose fixture has been retrofitted is a pin that needs updating, not an
assertion-free pass counted in the totals.

The exact-set assertion stays. An empty expected set is still valid and still
pins that no new dangling target appeared -- which is what it becomes once
research is retrofitted. Both loops carry a shellcheck SC2043 waiver for the
same reason: one entry is the expected steady state, not bad quoting.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:34:24 +00:00
Defame1297 37382cb72a refactor(gitea-labels-milestones): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 835 -> 214 chars, body 669 -> 426 words, Gotchas 8 entries/63% of
body -> 3/20.4%. Clears the description FAIL, all three Vale CompositionNote
errors and both Gotchas suggestions. 63% was the worst Gotchas ratio in the
corpus.

Cut the composition sentence to README -- it changes no routing decision and an
agent picks this skill because the user asked about labels, not because two
other skills call it. Cut the capability enumeration; 'list, create, edit,
delete' decompose 'reading or writing' and add no trigger.

Boundary clauses are now one arrow per target. The resolver extracts only the
first name per arrow clause, so the previous '-> gitea-issues / gitea-prs' left
gitea-prs neither dangling nor checked while validate.sh reported 1 of 1. Now
2 of 2.

Makes org-scoped label resolution executable. The org label pool was reachable
in principle -- four *_org_label* methods, and a claim to own name-to-ID
resolution -- but list_org_labels takes org, and Step 1 derived only owner and
repo, so both resolution procedures stalled at the fallback. Fixed once at the
identity step rather than per-procedure. get_user_orgs is outside allowed-tools,
so the failing call is the discriminator: a failure means the owner is a user
account with no org pool, which is an answer, not an error.

Corrects a Gotcha that was false for create_repo_label/create_org_label and
collided with the literal tool name label_write. Same false claim removed from
README.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:29:18 +00:00
Defame1297 78015893d4 refactor(gitea-issues): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 827 -> 182 chars, body 902 -> 584 words, Gotchas 7 entries/43% of
body -> 4/23.1%. Clears both size FAILs, the dangling-target FAIL and the Vale
CompositionNote error.

The dangling 'gitea-labels' target is gone with the composition sentence that
carried it -- a YAML fold artifact, not a typo: the '>'-folded scalar joined
'gitea-labels-' and 'milestones' across a line break, leaving the name terminal
and danglable. Both boundary names now sit whole on one source line each, and
both resolve.

Cut the second trigger register, the seven-verb capability enumeration, the
issue_write implementation detail and a gitea-branches boundary that defended
nothing. Two Gotchas deleted as spec restatement carried in references/, one as
a paraphrase of the step below it.

Closes a capability hole rather than papering over it: gitea-labels-milestones
routes label application here and has no issue_write, but no dispatch row
existed for add/replace/remove/clear_labels or get_labels. Both rows added.
The label ID/name Gotcha is now stated per method -- issue_write takes IDs,
list_issues and search_issues filter by name, issue_read 'get' returns names
but 'get_labels' returns full objects with IDs.

Drops a stale quotation of gitea-labels-milestones' description from
references/enrichments.md; that string went with its composition note.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:28:54 +00:00
Defame1297 0079f3508c fix(gitea-prs): correct reference drift against gitea-mcp v1.7.0
The reference files were last verified against v1.3.0 -- references/sources.md
still said so. PR #106 re-verified the write side only, so three defects had
accumulated on the read/review side. All three reproduced against the deployed
server before being fixed; get_gitea_mcp_server_version reports v1.7.0.

- reviews.md forbade review_comments on the "get" response and directed callers
  to review_scomments, which does not exist. The upstream slim.go typo was
  corrected; a live pull_request_read on PR #106 returns "review_comments":1 and
  no review_scomments key. review_comments is an integer count, not comment
  objects -- distinct from the get_review_comments method. Also fixed in
  pull-requests.md's response-shape list.
- pull_request_review_write grants seven methods; only four were documented.
  reply_comment, resolve_thread, unresolve_thread and the comment_id parameter
  had zero mentions anywhere in the skill. Documented from the schema, in a
  Comment threads section kept outside the numbered review state machine --
  they are not lifecycle states.
- review_id was documented as required for get_review_comments. It is optional;
  omitting it lists every inline comment on the PR. Confirmed behaviourally:
  get_review without it errors, get_review_comments without it returns [].

sources.md now records v1.7.0 as the last-verified version, so the next reader
knows what these files were checked against.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:21:11 +00:00
Defame1297 d578d6b2f2 refactor(gitea-prs): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 709 -> 161 chars, body 683 -> 353 words, Gotchas 8 entries/56% of
body -> 2/24.9%. Clears the description FAIL and both Vale CompositionNote
errors.

Fixes the three stale claims recorded on issue #99, all re-verified against the
deployed gitea-mcp schema during review:

- The description no longer advertises 'reviewers' as an update capability.
  editPullRequestFn never reads reviewers or team_reviewers; only
  add_reviewers/remove_reviewers do.
- milestone is now marked honoured on "update" only, in the Gotcha, the body
  and the dispatch table's create row. On "create" the server discards it and
  omits the key from the response, so the drop is indistinguishable from never
  passing it -- and labels DOES apply on create, so labels landing is no
  evidence the milestone did. The old text told callers to resolve a milestone
  before any write, wasting the lookup on create.
- The superseded un-draft workaround is gone. "update" with draft:false and no
  title makes the server strip the prefix itself, including [WIP],
  case-insensitively -- carried by references/pull-requests.md, corrected in
  PR #106.

The 22-row tool/method table becomes a 5-row dispatch table; all 20 operations
it named remain reachable, including update_branch and the reviewer methods.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:10:21 +00:00
Defame1297 d5954d3d99 refactor(gitea-files): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 787 -> 263 chars, body 922 -> 302 words, Gotchas 9 entries/69% of
body -> 3/24.8%. Clears both size FAILs and both Gotchas suggestions.

Deleted the second trigger register outright -- ~300 chars re-quoting the same
six verbs as user phrasings, which ADR-0020 names this skill for specifically.

Split the body on the read/write boundary: one invocation cannot both read and
write, so a dispatch table is mandatory. Six operations collapse into two flow
files rather than six -- create/update/delete share one tool pair and one
SHA-first lifecycle whose preamble would otherwise be triplicated, and the three
read tools share ref selection plus a 'neither listing is a SHA source'
comparison that only exists between them.

references/examples.md removed; all eight of its content blocks and all nine
named parameters carry into references/writing.md, verified against git HEAD.
Two deltas are corrections: the repo tree is now ruled out as a SHA source, and
reusing a SHA captured earlier in the conversation is now forbidden.

Four Gotchas relocated to the flow file that needs them; two promoted to gates
(SHA-as-concurrency-token opens writing.md; owner/repo became ## Inputs).

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:09:52 +00:00
Defame1297 ee812699a4 refactor(gitea-branches): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 688 -> 282 chars, body 435 -> 293 words, Gotchas 5 entries/54% of
body -> 3/23.5%. Clears the description FAIL and the Gotchas suggestion.

Cut the second trigger register (six re-quoted user phrasings) and the capability
enumeration; both moved to a new Boundaries section in the skill's own README.
Kept all three boundary clauses -- git-branches, git-history and gitea-prs each
defend a real activation steal, and gitea-prs is now the only guard on the
branch/PR collision in either direction since gitea-prs's own retrofit narrowed
its boundary to issues. Written as one arrow per target: the resolver extracts
only the first name per arrow clause, so conjoined targets go unchecked.

Two Gotchas deleted -- one paraphrased the step below it (its non-obvious half,
the get_me/list_my_repos token-scope block, was folded into that step), the other
is carried in full by references/branches.md:40-52.

Repoint two reference pointers the rename broke: branches.md and commits.md named
Gotchas by titles this retrofit changed. Now named by stable descriptors.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:08:38 +00:00
Defame1297 dfacf051a8 refactor(gitea-releases): retrofit to the ADR-0020 context contract
Description 500 -> 211 chars, body 676 -> 462 words, Gotchas 5 entries/41% of
body -> 3/21%. Clears the description FAIL and both Gotchas suggestions.

Cut the second trigger register (the re-quoted user phrasings), the doubled
capability enumeration across releases and tags, and the gitea-issues/gitea-prs
boundary, which defended against nothing -- neither was going to win a release
request. Kept the indirect trigger and the one real near-miss, gitea-branches.

Releases and tags are one flow, not two: 'delete the release and its tag' is a
single invocation that takes both branches, which disqualifies mutual
exclusivity, so no dispatch split. Two Gotchas moved to references/ behind
explicit triggers; one deleted as a paraphrase of the step below it.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 12:06:37 +00:00
Defame1297 ef3e981eac docs(context): record that hand-invocation blocks skill-to-skill routing
The Hand-invoked skill entry covered listing visibility and preload tax but not
invocability. Measured: disable-model-invocation: true hard-blocks the Skill
tool, not just the model-visible listing, so a `Call `x`` step in another
skill's body stops working the moment x takes the flag.

ADR-0020's 'Invocation as a design axis' verified only the visibility and slash
directions. Without this half, marking grill-with-docs hand-invoked -- one of
issue #99's four named candidates -- would silently break forge Step 1, which
calls it, plus three other inbound routes.

Refs #99
2026-08-30 11:54:26 +00:00
Defame1297 5f984ce34a chore(apm): refresh lock after SessionStart update
The SessionStart hook found six packages behind the remote default branch and
ran apm update. Committing the resulting lock separately so it does not sit in
the ADR-0020 retrofit diff.
2026-08-30 11:54:18 +00:00
266 changed files with 1766 additions and 9112 deletions

No files matched your search

+7 -7
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "holocron",
"description": "AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.",
"version": "0.4.6",
"version": "0.5.0",
"owner": {
"name": "Defame1297",
"email": "[email protected]",
@@ -11,35 +11,35 @@
{
"name": "kyberforge",
"description": "Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.",
"version": "1.6.2",
"version": "1.7.0",
"category": "Developer Tools",
"source": "./plugins/kyberforge"
},
{
"name": "bin",
"description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
"version": "1.1.7",
"version": "1.2.0",
"category": "Utilities",
"source": "./plugins/bin"
},
{
"name": "git",
"description": "Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.",
"version": "1.3.7",
"version": "1.4.0",
"category": "Version Control",
"source": "./plugins/git"
},
{
"name": "gitea",
"description": "Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.",
"version": "1.3.8",
"version": "1.4.0",
"category": "Version Control",
"source": "./plugins/gitea"
},
{
"name": "core",
"description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
"version": "1.1.2",
"version": "1.2.0",
"category": "Productivity",
"source": "./plugins/core"
},
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
{
"name": "lint",
"description": "Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.",
"version": "1.1.7",
"version": "1.2.0",
"category": "Developer Tools",
"source": "./plugins/lint"
}
+7 -7
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "holocron",
"description": "AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.",
"version": "0.4.6",
"version": "0.5.0",
"owner": {
"name": "Defame1297",
"email": "[email protected]",
@@ -11,35 +11,35 @@
{
"name": "kyberforge",
"description": "Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.",
"version": "1.6.2",
"version": "1.7.0",
"category": "Developer Tools",
"source": "./plugins/kyberforge"
},
{
"name": "bin",
"description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
"version": "1.1.7",
"version": "1.2.0",
"category": "Utilities",
"source": "./plugins/bin"
},
{
"name": "git",
"description": "Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.",
"version": "1.3.7",
"version": "1.4.0",
"category": "Version Control",
"source": "./plugins/git"
},
{
"name": "gitea",
"description": "Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.",
"version": "1.3.8",
"version": "1.4.0",
"category": "Version Control",
"source": "./plugins/gitea"
},
{
"name": "core",
"description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
"version": "1.1.2",
"version": "1.2.0",
"category": "Productivity",
"source": "./plugins/core"
},
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
{
"name": "lint",
"description": "Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.",
"version": "1.1.7",
"version": "1.2.0",
"category": "Developer Tools",
"source": "./plugins/lint"
}
+5 -82
View File
@@ -254,79 +254,17 @@ repos:
entry: bash
language: system
files: '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$'
# Pinned by tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh, which drives this exact
# `bash -c <script> <arg0> <files...>` call shape rather than a copy of
# the script -- the bug below was invisible to any test that did not.
args:
- -c
- |
# Every check reads the FRONTMATTER only, never the whole file. A
# `metadata:` / `name:` / `description:` line inside a body code
# fence is documentation (skill-author quotes exactly such a block)
# and used to satisfy these greps.
for f in "$@"; do
[[ -f "$f" ]] || continue
fm="$(awk '
{ sub(/\r$/, "") }
NR == 1 { sub(/^\357\273\277/, "") }
!opened && /^[[:blank:]]*$/ { next }
!opened {
if ($0 ~ /^---[[:blank:]]*$/) { opened = 1; next }
exit
}
/^---[[:blank:]]*$/ { closed = 1; exit }
{ print }
END { if (!opened || !closed) exit 3 }
' "$f")" || {
echo "ERROR: $f has no closing YAML frontmatter block (expected --- ... --- at the top of the file)"
exit 1
}
missing=""
printf '%s\n' "$fm" | grep -q "^name:" || missing="${missing}name: "
printf '%s\n' "$fm" | grep -q "^description:" || missing="${missing}description: "
# Scoped to the `metadata:` block and stopped at the next
# top-level key, so a `version:` under a following `source:` list
# cannot stand in for it; the `^ version:` anchor is exact, so a
# deeper-nested ` version:` cannot either. No line budget, so a
# long `metadata:` block does not hide the key.
ver="$(printf '%s\n' "$fm" | awk '
/^metadata:/ { inm = 1; next }
inm && /^[A-Za-z]/ { exit }
inm && /^ version:/ {
v = $0
sub(/^ version:[[:blank:]]*/, "", v)
sub(/[[:blank:]]+#.*$/, "", v)
sub(/[[:blank:]]+$/, "", v)
print "found:" v
exit
}
')"
[[ -n "$ver" ]] || missing="${missing}metadata.version "
if [[ -n "$missing" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: $f is missing required frontmatter fields (${missing})"
exit 1
fi
raw="${ver#found:}"
v="$raw"
case "$v" in
\"*\") v="${v#\"}"; v="${v%\"}" ;;
\'*\') v="${v#\'}"; v="${v%\'}" ;;
esac
if [[ ! "$v" =~ ^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$ ]]; then
echo "ERROR: $f has a malformed frontmatter metadata.version (${raw:-<empty>}) -- expected a three-part semver, e.g. \"1.0.0\""
exit 1
if [[ -f "$f" ]]; then
if ! grep -q "^name:" "$f" || ! grep -q "^description:" "$f"; then
echo "ERROR: $f is missing required frontmatter fields (name: and description:)"
exit 1
fi
fi
done
# arg0 for `bash -c`. WITHOUT it pre-commit's first filename lands in
# $0 and is dropped from "$@" -- so a single-file commit, the normal
# case, ran the loop zero times and reported Passed having checked
# nothing. Do not remove; tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh pins it.
- skill-frontmatter
- id: skill-size-check
stages: ['pre-commit']
@@ -346,21 +284,6 @@ repos:
# records for Vale warnings. Costs nothing on a clean file: the script
# prints only findings.
- id: check-rtk-prefix
stages: ['pre-commit']
name: ADR-0023 rtk prefix on executable git commands
description: Enforce ADR-0023 clause 1 -- an executable, instructed git command in a shell code fence or a dispatch-table Run cell is written `rtk git`. Clauses 2 and 3 are not machine-decidable; a deliberately bare command opts out with the literal string ADR-0023 on its own line
entry: scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh
language: script
files: '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/(skills/.*\.md|agents/.*\.agent\.md)$'
# README.md is excluded on purpose, not by oversight. A skill-directory
# README is consumer-facing prose that no agent ever loads, and the
# `git clone` lines in the seven tests/README.md files are setup
# instructions for a third party who has no rtk installed. Prefixing
# those would be actively wrong -- see ADR-0023's consumer section.
exclude: '(^|/)README\.md$'
pass_filenames: true
- id: vale-audit-prefilter-skill
stages: ['pre-commit']
name: Vale audit prefilter (SKILL.md)
+4 -2
View File
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ This file carries only what applies to **every** session. Setup, prerequisites,
Not everything in a plugin root is generated. `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json` and per-plugin extras are hand-authored there with no `.apm/` source — edit those in place. The rule is per-path, not per-directory. But a file placed *inside* a mirrored directory is deleted on the next sync (`sync_dir` runs `rm -rf` before every copy), so plugin-root documentation goes in `docs/`, never in `hooks/` or `skills/`.
`.mcp.json` is hand-authored but it is **not** outside apm. MCP is a first-class apm primitive, and a plugin's `.mcp.json` is how this repo declares one: apm reads the `mcpServers` pointer in the generated `.github/plugin/plugin.json`, resolves it to `.mcp.json`, and injects the result into that package's `dependencies.mcp` when a consumer installs it. Declare MCP servers there and **never** in the plugin's own `apm.yml` — that arms a per-package gate this repo cannot satisfy (`LESSONS.md`, 2026-09-12).
Full model: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
## Prefer plugin skills over raw shell
@@ -38,7 +36,11 @@ Fall back to raw shell only when no skill covers it.
- **Do not add repo-owned keys to `.claude/settings.json`.** apm treats it as its own deployed artifact and `apm audit --ci` replays the install and diffs, so anything apm would not have written is permanent drift that fails the `apm-audit-ci` pre-push hook. A hook you want here is authored in `plugins/<name>/.apm/hooks/` and deployed by apm, never hand-written into that file. The `SessionStart` entry already in it is exactly that: kyberforge authors it in `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/hooks/hooks.json` and apm merges it in, so it is apm's own output, it is what the replay expects, and it belongs in the commit — do not strip it (ADR-0019). Machine-specific settings go in the gitignored `.claude/settings.local.json`; shared enforcement goes in `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
- **`apm.lock.yaml` turning up modified is expected, not a bug.** kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook runs `apm outdated` at startup and `apm update --yes` when something is behind, which rewrites the lock. Commit or discard it deliberately.
- **A `.apm/` edit is not live in this session until it is pushed.** The six dependencies resolve from the holocron remote, unpinned against the default branch. `apm install` deploys from the lock; `apm update` is what re-resolves refs.
- **The ADR-0020 skill gates ship hot, with no baseline — and the corpus is now clean.** All 39 skills clear both FAIL tiers: no description over 400 characters, no body over 900 words (counted body-only). Retrofitted plugin by plugin under #99 (see `docs/spec/gates.md`). Because nothing is grandfathered, the gates now bite on first commit — a new skill, or an edit that pushes a description past 400, is blocked until it complies. **No routing target dangles**, and `tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh` pins that set as empty, so a new boundary clause naming a non-existent skill fails the suite rather than joining a backlog. Two blind spots survive: `skill-size-check` does not cover the Vale half, so `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` fires nowhere today but any new description can reintroduce it; and no `references/` file is linted by anything, so prose relocated out of a body to satisfy the word gate lands outside the prose gate. It has two independent causes and closing either alone changes nothing — `docs/spec/gates.md` has both, issue #117 tracks it. Check both gates: `pre-commit run --all-files`.
- **Run `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict` before considering any change done.** Keep the flag: without it a suite whose dependency is missing exits 77 and is counted SKIPPED rather than failed, so the run goes green having verified less than it claims.
- **Before pushing, rehearse the gate locally:** `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files`. It runs the 14 pre-push hooks this repo authors itself plus pre-commit's 2 `meta` hooks, so it prints 16; `check-release-needed` passes without checking anything, because it needs a real push to `main`. `docs/spec/gates.md` reconciles both.
- **Pushing without a network** needs `SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push` — those two resolve a remote marketplace entry via `git ls-remote`. Skip only those two; the rest are real local checks, and adding one to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
- **Author commits with `git-commits`** — it validates Conventional Commits, which `commit-msg` enforces.
- **This repo and Gitea are the only source of truth.** All project state, decisions, and working conventions live here. Do not use an external memory system for this project — cached state diverges from the repo and you get a split brain. Before answering any design or architecture question, check `docs/adr/` for an existing decision.
## Key documents
+3 -7
View File
@@ -16,12 +16,8 @@ decisions.
**Preload tax**:
The always-on context cost of every installed skill's `name` and `description`, charged from the
first token of every session whether the skill is invoked or not. Measurement method: ADR-0020. Its
**23,427 characters is the pre-retrofit baseline, not a current reading** — measured at the decision
commit, before #99. Across the same 39 skills it is **10,478 characters** (~2,620 tokens) as of
2026-09-01. Both figures move with the corpus, so re-derive rather than quote either: sum
`len(name) + len(description)` over the frontmatter of every `plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`,
folding block scalars as `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` does.
first token of every session whether the skill is invoked or not. Measurement method and current
figure: ADR-0020.
_Avoid_: context cost, token overhead
**Skill context contract**:
@@ -48,7 +44,7 @@ _Avoid_: router body, thin body
A skill reached only by typing its slash command, declared `disable-model-invocation: true`. The host
withholds it from the model-visible listing entirely, so it pays no preload tax and its description
becomes human-facing text. The flag also hard-blocks the Skill tool, so **no other skill can route to
a hand-invoked skill** — a `` Call `x` `` step in another skill's body stops working the moment `x`
a hand-invoked skill** — a `Call \`x\`` step in another skill's body stops working the moment `x`
takes the flag. Check inbound routes before declaring one. Exemplar: `zoom-out`.
_Avoid_: manual skill, disabled skill
+12 -12
View File
@@ -10,14 +10,6 @@ Patterns observed during development of this repo. Three or more entries on the
---
## 2026-09-12 — "Not an `.apm/` primitive" was read as "not an apm primitive", and the review that followed was wrong
`AGENTS.md` and `docs/spec/architecture.md` both listed `.mcp.json` alongside `README.md`, `docs/` and `bin/` as plugin-root material "hand-authored with no `.apm/` source". That is literally true — nothing under `.apm/` produces MCP config — but it reads as "apm has no MCP concept", and a review of PR #132 drew exactly that conclusion and recommended moving the declaration into the plugin's `apm.yml` under `dependencies.mcp`. The recommendation was wrong twice over. It arms `lockfile-exists` in the per-package `apm audit --ci` that the `apm-audit-ci` hook runs in every `plugins/*/`, which then demands the package's whole deployed tree inside the package directory: 93 missing files and 79 drifted paths on `plugins/gitea`. And it was unnecessary, because the `.mcp.json` route already reaches `dependencies.mcp` through the `mcpServers` pointer in the generated Copilot manifest, env references intact.
Two process lessons, not one. First, when a doc says a file is not a primitive **of a specific subsystem**, say which subsystem and what the file actually is instead — the negative claim alone invites the wrong generalisation. Second, the three scratch installs that produced the wrong conclusion all used local `./path` dependencies, where apm skips the plugin-normalisation step that injects `.mcp.json`. The repo consumes its plugins as `git:` + `path:` objects. A scratch test that does not reproduce the real dependency form can invert the result, so reproduce the form, not just the shape.
---
## 2026-05-17 — Workflow documents should prescribe sub-agent usage, not just allow it
When writing workflow documents (like `docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md`), the natural tendency is to describe steps at a high level and leave sub-agent usage as an implementation detail. But if the workflow doesn't explicitly prescribe "spawn a sub-agent here," practitioners default to doing everything in the main context — accumulating token cost and losing the isolation benefit. Fix: make sub-agent usage a named step in the workflow, specifying what the agent receives, what it returns, and why it's isolated. This makes the workflow reproducible rather than dependent on the practitioner remembering to use agents.
@@ -68,21 +60,29 @@ write-eval's process requires presenting the full test plan and waiting for user
The write-skill authoring standard required 8 body sections including Role and When/When not. These were assumed to be agentskills.io requirements. Checking the actual spec revealed the body has no format restrictions at all — recommended sections are step-by-step instructions, examples, and edge cases. Role and When/When not were added by convention without verifying the standard. Fix: before encoding any requirement as part of an authoring standard, check the upstream spec directly. The agentskills.io spec also confirmed that negative triggers belong in the description field — not in a separate body section — which eliminates a persistent duplication pattern across all skills.
## 2026-05-18 — Provenance fields in frontmatter are loaded on every skill scan
Fields like `source:`, `references:`, `version:`, `updated:`, and `when:` in SKILL.md frontmatter are loaded at agent startup alongside `name` and `description` for every installed skill. None of these are used for routing or runtime execution — they are audit and upgrade-cycle records. Loading them at startup violates progressive disclosure and wastes tokens proportional to the number of installed skills. Fix: move all non-routing frontmatter to a separate `META.md` file in the skill directory. Frontmatter keeps only `name`, `description`, `metadata.category`, and `allowed-tools` (when applicable) — the four fields the spec actually uses for routing and discovery.
## 2026-05-18 — Copy-fill is more deterministic than generate for structured skill artifacts
When a skill produces a structured artifact like SKILL.md, the natural approach is to generate it from internalized rules in the Process section. But this means section structure is only as reliable as the agent's instruction-following under token pressure. Copy-fill (copy the template to the target path, then fill in content) separates structure from content: the template mechanically enforces section order and presence, freeing the Process section to focus only on sequencing constraints (what order to decide things) rather than also policing structure. Side benefit: the template is a human-usable artifact that can be adopted independently of the skill. Fix applied in write-skill refactor: SKILL-TEMPLATE.md is the authoritative structure source; the Process section no longer contains a body structure constraint — the template handles it.
When a skill produces a structured artifact like SKILL.md, the natural approach is to generate it from internalized rules in the Process section. But this means section structure is only as reliable as the agent's instruction-following under token pressure. Copy-fill (copy the template to the target path, then fill in content) separates structure from content: the template mechanically enforces section order and presence, freeing the Process section to focus only on sequencing constraints (what order to decide things) rather than also policing structure. Side benefit: the template is a human-usable artifact that can be adopted independently of the skill. Fix applied in write-skill refactor: SKILL-TEMPLATE.md and META-TEMPLATE.md are the authoritative structure sources; the Process section no longer contains a body structure constraint — the template handles it.
## 2026-05-17 — HITL gap: agent delegates confirmation to permission system
The agent-level HITL rule ("require explicit confirmation before irreversible shared-state operations") is being bypassed: the agent calls the tool and lets the permission dialog catch it. This means the rule is not firing in agent reasoning — it's the permission system acting as a safety net. If a user selects "don't ask again," the net disappears. Fix: the HITL rule needs to be framed as "do not call the tool" rather than "ask before proceeding" — the agent must ask first, then act only after explicit confirmation.
## 2026-05-26 — META-TEMPLATE uses YAML comments; META.md output retains them
META-TEMPLATE.md uses YAML `#` comments to explain fields inline. SKILL-TEMPLATE.md uses HTML comments inside XML tags, which the agent strips on fill. The structural difference means SKILL.md output is clean but META.md output retains the explanatory `#` lines — an inconsistency. Fix (deferred): restructure META-TEMPLATE.md so all explanatory guidance is prose above the code block (markdown, never copied into the output YAML), and the code block itself uses `<placeholder>` syntax with no `#` comment lines. This makes META.md fill behaviour deterministic for the same reason SKILL.md fill is: `<...>` markers are unambiguously replaceable; prose above the block is not part of the template. Do not apply until the human/copy-fill tradeoff is resolved — see 2026-05-26 session discussion.
## 2026-05-26 — Overlap checks must scan the deployed directory, not just the source repo
`write-a-skill` existed only in `~/.agents/skills/` (installed from a pre-refactor source) and was invisible during a repo-level scan of `.agents/skills/`. Governance reviews and overlap checks that only look at the source repo will miss skills added by install.sh from other sources or prior runs. Fix: overlap checks must scan the deployed `~/.agents/skills/` directory, not just the repo's `.agents/skills/`.
## 2026-05-26 — `model:` field belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not a sidecar file
## 2026-05-26 — `model:` field belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not META.md
Claude Code supports `model:` as a provider extension in SKILL.md frontmatter — it overrides the session model for the skill's turn and reverts after. Attempting to move it out to a provenance sidecar was wrong: a sidecar is audit metadata, not runtime config. The boundary: if a field affects agent behaviour at invocation time, it belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter.
Claude Code supports `model:` as a provider extension in SKILL.md frontmatter — it overrides the session model for the skill's turn and reverts after. Attempting to put it in META.md was wrong: META.md is provenance/audit metadata, not runtime config. The boundary: if a field affects agent behaviour at invocation time, it belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter; if it serves upgrade reviews and audit trails, it belongs in META.md.
## 2026-05-26 — Research agents present synthesis as spec fact
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ Two forks independently fixed `references/sources.md` with different approaches
## 2026-06-28 — Implementation agents must invoke /skill-author, not write skill files directly
When briefing an agent to implement a new skill, the instinct is to tell it to write the SKILL.md and supporting files directly. This bypasses Step 5 of the skill-author process (provenance), which requires reading all research `sources.md` files and recording every `extracted` slug in the skill's own `references/sources.md`. The `validate-provenance.sh` script catches the gap — but only after the commit, requiring a fix round. This pattern recurred twice in one session (plugin-author and marketplace-author initial implementation, then again in the first round of fix agents). Fix: briefs for implementation agents must explicitly say "invoke `/skill-author` (read and follow `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/SKILL.md`)" — not "write the skill files." Invoking the skill is the only reliable way to ensure all process gates, including provenance, run.
When briefing an agent to implement a new skill, the instinct is to tell it to write the SKILL.md and supporting files directly. This bypasses Step 5 of the skill-author process (provenance), which requires reading all research `sources.md` files and recording every `extracted` slug in META.md. The `validate-provenance.sh` script catches the gap — but only after the commit, requiring a fix round. This pattern recurred twice in one session (plugin-author and marketplace-author initial implementation, then again in the first round of fix agents). Fix: briefs for implementation agents must explicitly say "invoke `/skill-author` (read and follow `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/SKILL.md`)" — not "write the skill files." Invoking the skill is the only reliable way to ensure all process gates, including provenance, run.
## 2026-07-05 — Repo root is a bare checkout; work happens in worktrees only
-11
View File
@@ -35,17 +35,6 @@ Install all of these before setting up. Each one is a hard dependency of a git h
| `python3` + PyYAML | Required by `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` (the `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook), which reads folded YAML frontmatter | `python3` is usually present — pre-commit is itself a Python application. `pip install pyyaml` if the hook reports PyYAML missing |
| `vale` | Required by the `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` / `-agent` pre-commit hooks and the `check-vale-style-sync` pre-push hook | `brew install vale` (macOS), `snap install vale` (Linux), `choco install vale` (Windows), or https://vale.sh/docs/vale-cli/installation/ |
| `claude` CLI | Required by the `validate-plugins` and `validate-marketplace` pre-push hooks | Claude Code |
| `go` toolchain | The gitea MCP server runs as `go run gitea.com/gitea/[email protected]`, resolved from `PATH`. Without it the server fails to start and every `gitea-*` skill loses its tools | https://go.dev/dl/ — verify with `go version` |
The gitea MCP server additionally needs two environment variables in the shell that launches your agent — referenced as `${GITEA_ACCESS_TOKEN}` and `${GITEA_HOST}` in `plugins/gitea/.mcp.json`, with apm passing those references through to the deployed config unexpanded so the values are resolved at server startup and never committed. Copy `plugins/gitea/.env.example` to `.env` at the repo root, fill in real values, then export it — nothing in this repo auto-loads a `.env` file:
```bash
cp plugins/gitea/.env.example .env
$EDITOR .env
set -a; source .env; set +a
```
Generate the token in Gitea under Settings, Applications. Scope it to the repositories you want the agent to reach. If the server starts but every call returns an authorization error, that token is the first thing to check.
Two notes worth reading before you skip one:
+340 -802
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large. Load diff
+9 -9
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: holocron
version: 0.4.6
version: 0.5.0
description: AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.
license: MIT
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ dependencies:
# after a kyberforge release, check this first.
executables:
allow:
kyberforge#1.6.2:
kyberforge#1.7.0:
hooks: true
bin: true
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ marketplace:
# top-level apm.yml description:/version: above are NOT inherited into the
# compiled output despite being used elsewhere (e.g. by `apm audit`).
description: AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.
version: 0.4.6
version: 0.5.0
owner:
name: Defame1297
email: [email protected]
@@ -79,31 +79,31 @@ marketplace:
- name: kyberforge
description: Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.
source: ./plugins/kyberforge
version: 1.6.2
version: 1.7.0
category: Developer Tools
- name: bin
description: Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.
source: ./plugins/bin
version: 1.1.7
version: 1.2.0
category: Utilities
- name: git
description: Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.
source: ./plugins/git
version: 1.3.7
version: 1.4.0
category: Version Control
- name: gitea
description: Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.
source: ./plugins/gitea
version: 1.3.8
version: 1.4.0
category: Version Control
- name: core
description: Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.
source: ./plugins/core
version: 1.1.2
version: 1.2.0
category: Productivity
- name: mattpocock-skills
@@ -115,5 +115,5 @@ marketplace:
- name: lint
description: Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.
source: ./plugins/lint
version: 1.1.7
version: 1.2.0
category: Developer Tools
@@ -127,15 +127,8 @@ clause**, and a **boundary clause**. Capability enumeration, output-format detai
gate shipping hot with no baseline cannot give two answers. Under the walk-up those four resolve
because sibling plugins are in the universe — no plugin here declares a cross-plugin apm
dependency, and none needs to. Verified: a tree holding only `plugins/` and the root `apm.yml`,
with no `.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, produced findings identical to the working tree. The
figures that reproduction recorded — 26 description FAILs, 9 body FAILs, 2 dangling targets, 0
missing references, 58 SUGGESTIONs — are the **pre-retrofit** corpus as it stood when the
experiment ran, kept here as the evidence for the install-independence claim, not as a current
reading. *Amended 2026-09-01: the #99 retrofit took the first three to zero. Measured at that
date over the same install-free tree: 0 description FAILs, 0 body FAILs, 0 dangling targets, 0
missing references, 29 SUGGESTIONs.* What the experiment establishes is that the two trees agree,
not what either measured; re-derive rather than quote —
`bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`.
with no `.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, now produces findings identical to the working tree —
26 description FAILs, 9 body FAILs, 2 dangling targets, 0 missing references, 58 SUGGESTIONs.
- **The universe is the apm marketplace, and nothing else.** A routing target resolves to a skill or
an agent, or it does not resolve. Host built-ins are deliberately outside it: `/compact`, `/clear`
and `/init` are Claude Code slash commands with no counterpart in Copilot CLI or Codex, so a
@@ -192,11 +185,8 @@ becomes the system prompt of a fresh context. The rationale for the 900-word FAI
That exemption is expressed in `agent-audit/scripts/validate.sh`, which has no body constant, and in
the `files:` pattern of the `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook, which is `SKILL.md`-only. It is *not*
expressed in `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` itself, which measures whatever path it is handed —
running it directly over `plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md` exits 1 with 900-word body FAILs on
`git-orchestrate` and `gitea-orchestrate`. *Amended 2026-09-01: this sentence named a third agent,
`apm-orchestrate`, at 1,080 words. It is 876 today — a SUGGESTION, not a FAIL. Counts are
deliberately no longer pinned here: agent bodies are edited like any other file and a figure in this
paragraph goes stale the moment one is trimmed. Run the command.* Agents escape by
running it directly over `plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md` today reports 900-word body FAILs on
`git-orchestrate` (933), `gitea-orchestrate` (1,199) and `apm-orchestrate` (1,080). Agents escape by
file pattern, not by the script knowing the difference. Anyone widening that pattern to cover agents
would silently enforce a gate this ADR declines to set.
@@ -255,7 +245,7 @@ which tier each rule is in, because the failure this ADR is most exposed to is a
| description characters (250 SUGGESTION † / 400 FAIL) | skills, agents | deterministic | `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`; constants mirrored in `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh` and `agent-audit/scripts/validate.sh` |
| body-only words (600 SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL) | skills | deterministic | `skill-size-check.sh`, `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh` |
| description present and non-empty (ERROR) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
| boundary target resolves to a real skill or agent — **three** verdicts, not two (ERROR when written in route notation — `/name`, or any arrow form; or when a *terminal* bare name's own sentence names another target that resolves. SUGGESTION otherwise. INFO, "DID NOT RUN", exit 0, when no skill universe could be determined for the path at all — no authoring root above it, no apm package root, no declared apm dependencies, no deployed `.claude/` or `.agents/` tree: the targets are named and left unchecked) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
| boundary target resolves to a real skill or agent (ERROR when written in route notation — `/name`, or any arrow form; or when a *terminal* bare name's own sentence names another target that resolves; SUGGESTION otherwise) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
| boundary clause absent — `absent` (SUGGESTION) † | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
| an arrow clause is present but no target can be read out of it — `unparsed` (SUGGESTION) † | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
| one arrow clause naming two or more targets, of which only the first is resolved (SUGGESTION, issue #107) † | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
@@ -388,17 +378,10 @@ carries is the ordinary one for hot gates: a gate expensive enough to be inconve
with `SKIP=` and loses its authority.
**A second hot gate ships alongside it, and it is easy to miss.** `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` is
`level: error` like every other rule in that style, so at decision time `pre-commit run --all-files`
was red on 10 alerts across `gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs` and
`gitea-workflow` independently of anything `skill-size-check` reports. Someone scoping the #99
retrofit off the size findings alone would have fixed those and still been blocked. The two gates
wanted fixing together, and were. *Amended 2026-09-01: that figure is historical. The Vale prefilter
over the same 39 files now reports 0 errors, 0 warnings and 0 suggestions, so
`Kyberforge.CompositionNote` fires nowhere in the corpus today. The rule is still hot and still
independent of `skill-size-check`, so a new description can reintroduce it; `skill-size-check` does
not cover the Vale half, and no `references/` file is linted by anything (`docs/spec/gates.md` has
both causes, issue #117 tracks them). Re-derive rather than quote —*
`bash plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-audit/scripts/vale-wrap.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`.
`level: error` like every other rule in that style, so `pre-commit run --all-files` is red on 10
alerts across `gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs` and `gitea-workflow`
independently of anything `skill-size-check` reports. Someone scoping the #99 retrofit off the size
findings alone will fix those and still be blocked. The two gates want fixing together.
**A ceiling does not produce an average.** If every author writes to the 400-character FAIL, the
preload lands at 39 × 400 = 15,600 chars — a 33% cut off 23,427, not the ~50% intended. Writing to
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
# Every skill's `metadata.version` is mandatory, not a per-plugin option
**Status: accepted (2026-09-07).**
## Context
`metadata.version` is optional SKILL.md frontmatter (`create.md`'s "Optional frontmatter" list:
"uncomment and fill in, or remove entirely"). `skill-author`'s own bump logic was written
conditionally — "with `metadata.version` present, bump the minor version on create... and the
patch version on improve" — which only makes sense if presence is a real per-skill choice.
Adoption never followed a rule; it followed the plugin. Of 39 skills, 12 carry a version:
| Plugin | Has it | Total |
|---|---|---|
| `core` | 3 | 3 |
| `gitea` | 6 | 7 |
| `lint` | 2 | 2 |
| `git` | 1 | 9 |
| `bin` | 0 | 11 |
| `kyberforge` | 0 | 7 |
`core`, `gitea` and `lint` are consistent adopters (`gitea-files` the one gap); `bin` and
`kyberforge` are consistent non-adopters; `git` has one outlier (`git-commits`, versioned for no
plugin-specific reason found on inspection — no comment, no cross-reference, nothing distinguishing
it from its eight siblings). Issue #127 raised this as an undocumented split: two house norms
coexisting with no stated rule for which applies where, the same class of defect as an unstated
`rtk`/bare-`git` convention (#113) found in the same audit pass.
## Decision
**Every skill's frontmatter carries `metadata.version`.** It is no longer optional, and no longer a
per-plugin choice.
- **The 27 skills that never carried one are seeded at `1.0.0`**, not `0.1.0`. `0.1.0` is
`skill-author`'s existing new-skill starting point, chosen for a skill with no revision history to
its name yet. These 27 have all been through the ADR-0020 retrofit and repeated audit passes
without ever tracking a version; crediting them with `0.1.0` would understate that, and there is
no real history to justify seeding higher than a first stable release. `1.0.0` marks "versioned as
of this retrofit," `0.1.0` keeps meaning "created and never yet revised."
- **New skills still start at `0.1.0`.** `skill-author`'s create/improve bump convention is
unchanged; only the presence of the field stops being conditional.
- **The one outlier in the other direction, `git-commits`, keeps its existing value** (`0.1.3`) —
it already had real tracked history under the old conditional rule, and this decision does not
reset skills that were already compliant.
- **`bin/write-docs`'s top-level `version:` moves into `metadata:`, normalized to `1.0.0`.** It is
the one skill that carried a version outside the `metadata:` block, which is why the table above
counts `bin` as 0 — a top-level `version:` is not `metadata.version`, and nothing reads it. #127
raised it alongside the split because "does a skill carry a version" and "where does it live" are
the same question. Its value (`1.0`) is not semver and carries no more real history than the 27
unversioned skills, so it is relocated and reset to the same `1.0.0` seed rather than preserved
like `git-commits`'s tracked `0.1.3`.
- **`skill-frontmatter`'s pre-commit hook gains the check.** It already fails a SKILL.md missing
`name:` or `description:`; a missing `metadata.version` is now the same class of failure, not a
style nit an audit might or might not catch.
## Considered options
**Leave it per-plugin, document the split.** This was the initial framing of #127 and is coherent —
`core`/`gitea`/`lint` keep it, `bin`/`kyberforge` don't, two outliers get normalized to match their
plugin. Rejected on reconsideration: a rule that says "some plugins track this and some don't" is
strictly harder to state, audit and onboard against than "every skill does," for a field whose entire
job is answering "did this change since I last read it" — a question with the same shape everywhere
it's asked, not one that varies by plugin domain.
**Drop the field corpus-wide.** Rejected: `skill-author` already depends on it to decide whether a
create/improve pass owes a bump, so the 12 skills carrying it are not tracking dead weight — removing
it discards real revision signal for no gain.
## Consequences
27 SKILL.md files gain `metadata.version: "1.0.0"`, and a 28th — `bin/write-docs` — reaches the same
value by relocating its top-level `version: "1.0"` into `metadata:`. `skill-author`'s `create.md`
moves the field from "Optional frontmatter" to the required list, citing this ADR. `skill-author`'s
own SKILL.md drops the "with `metadata.version` present" conditional in its bump-rule line, since
presence is no longer in question. `.pre-commit-config.yaml`'s `skill-frontmatter` hook is extended
to require the field, closing the gap #113 and #118 both named in the same audit pass: a stated rule
with nothing enforcing it drifts the same way an unstated one does.
@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
# The `rtk` prefix marks executable commands only, and is repo-wide
**Status: accepted (2026-09-08).**
## Context
`CLAUDE.md` states the org convention as a golden rule: "Always prefix commands with `rtk`. If RTK
has a dedicated filter, it uses it. If not, it passes through unchanged. This means RTK is always
safe to use." Issue #113 observed that the rule had never been written down for skill *prose*, where
a `git <subcommand>` mention can be either an instruction to execute or a reference to the concept,
and that the corpus had drifted into carrying both spellings with no stated rule. PR #130 swept the
`git` plugin and recorded a two-way split in `plugins/git/README.md`.
Review found two defects in that sweep, and both are in the premise rather than the execution.
**RTK is not output-transparent.** `rtk git --help` enumerates twelve filtered subcommands — `diff`,
`log`, `status`, `show`, `add`, `commit`, `push`, `pull`, `branch`, `fetch`, `stash`, `worktree`.
Everything else is a true passthrough. Inside that set the filter is not a formatting preference; it
changes what the command *reports*. Measured against rtk 0.42.4:
| Command | What rtk does to it |
|---|---|
| `worktree list --porcelain -z` | discards both flags; no NUL separators, no `locked`/`lock_reason` field at all |
| `worktree list -v` | abbreviates `/root/…` to `~/…`, collapses column alignment |
| `branch --list <name>` | emits a phantom `* ` line even on no match |
| `diff --name-only` / `--name-status` | appends a blank line and a `Changes:` trailer |
| `diff --word-diff[=color\|=porcelain]` | emits no `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers; substitutes a diffstat |
| `log -L` | truncates each diff body line at ~72 characters with an ellipsis |
| `stash pop` (on conflict) | prints only `FAILED: git stash pop`, swallowing `CONFLICT`, `Unmerged paths` and the retained-entry notice |
| `stash list` (empty) | prints `No stashes` where git prints nothing |
Every one of those falsified a skill that was written against the bare output. `git-worktrees`'s
Step 2 required `locked` and `lock_reason` from a command whose rtk rendering has never carried
them; `git-log-format.md` documented `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers beside a command that no longer
produces them. The two-way split could not see any of this, because both halves of it are about what
a *sentence* is doing and none of it is about what the *command* does.
**The rule is not `git`-plugin-scoped.** `plugins/git/README.md` claimed the `gitea-*` skills
"contain no `git`/`rtk` mentions at all". Five `gitea-*` SKILL.md files run `git remote get-url
origin` in a fenced ```bash Step block — the README's own canonical example of "executable,
instructed" — plus `git branch --show-current` in a reference file and three `git remote -v` in
`gitea-orchestrate.agent.md`. A convention stated inside one plugin's README is invisible from the
plugin next door, which is how those eight sites stayed bare through the sweep that existed to find
them.
## Decision
**One rule, three clauses, repo-wide** — every `plugins/*/.apm/skills/**` and
`plugins/*/.apm/agents/**` file, not the `git` plugin alone.
1. **Executable and instructed → `rtk git`.** Anything telling the agent to run a command now: an
imperative step, a dispatch-table "Run" cell, a fenced code-block procedure.
`rtk git push -u origin <branch>`.
2. **Illustrative or referential → bare `git`.** Naming a flag's behaviour, quoting a doc's own
heading, describing a command in the abstract, warning against an anti-pattern. "`git switch`
refuses rather than clobbering conflicting local edits."
3. **Machine-parsed or interactive → bare `git`, and say why inline.** A command whose output the
skill parses, where rtk is in the filtered set above; or a command that hands control to an
interactive child process.
Clause 3 is the new one and it looks arbitrary without the table in Context, which is why the
measurements are recorded here rather than left in a PR thread. It is applied per subcommand and per
flag, not per skill: `tag --list` stays prefixed because rtk passes it through byte-identically,
while `branch --list` two words away goes bare because it does not. `git remote get-url origin`,
`git remote -v`, `git branch --show-current`, `git log --oneline -1` and `git add -u` were all
re-measured as byte-identical passthroughs and are therefore prefixed, parsing notwithstanding.
Two consequences of that per-subcommand basis are worth stating, because both are load-bearing and
neither is comfortable:
- **rtk's filtered set is a moving target.** `git rebase` and `git mergetool` are passthroughs on
0.42.4 — verified under `script(1)`, both inherit a real TTY, contradicting an earlier report that
they did not. They stay bare anyway, on the interactive limb: a token filter has nothing to offer a
command that hands control to an editor, and the prefix would only buy exposure to whatever a later
rtk version decides to do with those subcommands. The same reasoning makes the *inner* call in
`` `rtk git remote add origin-push $(git config remote.origin.url)` `` bare while the outer stays
prefixed — `config` passes through cleanly today, but its stdout becomes a remote URL that is then
force-pushed to, and that is not a blast radius to lend to a future filter change.
- **`branch --show-current` sits on the sharp edge.** It is in the filtered set, it is parsed, and it
is prefixed — on a measurement, in a subcommand whose sibling `--list` is exactly the defect clause
3 exists for. If rtk's `branch` filter is ever extended, that is the first site to break. It is
called out rather than hedged, because a rule whose exceptions are unrecorded is the state this ADR
is replacing.
**A clause-3 site says so inline, in a few words.** "bare, not `rtk`: rtk prints a phantom `* ` line
even on no match". Without it the next sweep re-prefixes the command, which is how #113 recurs.
**The rule lives here, and `docs/spec/gates.md` carries the gate.** `plugins/git/README.md` is
reduced to a pointer. It had also cited `git-workflow/references/hard-rules.md` as a place the rule
was written down; that file contains no occurrence of "rtk", and the citation is removed rather than
repaired.
**Clause 1 is enforced by a `check-rtk-prefix` pre-commit hook; clauses 2 and 3 are not enforceable
and are not gated.** The hook checks the two places a `git` mention is unambiguously an instruction —
a line in a shell-tagged code fence, and the opening backticked span of a "Run" column cell — and a
deliberately-bare command opts out with the literal string `ADR-0023` on its own line. Its coverage
limits are recorded in `docs/spec/gates.md`, not smoothed over.
## Considered options
**Add `compatibility:` frontmatter to every skill.** These six plugins are installable by third
parties, and a consumer who installs `git` from the marketplace has no `rtk` on their PATH. Every
prefixed command in the corpus is a plain `git` invocation with a word in front of it, so the prefix
is *droppable*: delete `rtk ` and the command is correct. A `compatibility:` line per skill would
state that in a machine-readable field. Rejected on cost. It is 39 lines of frontmatter restating one
sentence, it is preloaded into every agent's context every session under ADR-0020's budget — the
field is not free the way a line in a doc is — and it has no consumer: nothing reads
`compatibility:`, so the field would be a comment with a colon in it. The consumer situation is
documented here and in `plugins/git/README.md` instead, which is where a human installing a plugin
actually looks. The same two-line note is owed to the other five plugin READMEs and is not yet
written.
**Move rtk to the execution layer entirely.** Skills instruct bare `git` throughout; `CLAUDE.md`'s
session rule handles prefixing at the point of execution. This is the strongest rejected option and
it deserves the space: it closes the consumer gap and all eight output defects at once, because the
executing agent knows what it is about to parse and the skill does not have to predict it. It also
removes clause 3 entirely — there is nothing to except. Rejected because the prefix is lost wherever
an agent copies a command literally, which is the common case for a fenced procedure block and the
whole reason dispatch tables exist. The org convention's value is that the prefix is *already there*
in the text the agent lifts; a rule that relies on the agent remembering to add it is the rule that
produced the drift in the first place. Worth revisiting if rtk ever ships a shell shim, which would
make the execution layer transparent and this trade different.
**Keep the two-way split and fix the eight sites by hand.** Rejected: the split has no vocabulary for
"this command is executable, instructed, and must still be bare", so the eight sites would be
unexplained exceptions and the next sweep re-prefixes them. That is the failure this ADR exists to
stop, not a smaller version of it.
**Gate clauses 2 and 3 as well.** Rejected as undecidable. "Run `git switch <branch>`" and "`git
switch` refuses rather than clobbering local edits" are the same token sequence; separating them is a
judgement about what a sentence is doing. A gate that guessed would fire on correct content, and a
gate that fires on correct content gets added to `SKIP`, which disarms clause 1 along with it.
## The boundary the rule does not decide
Two shapes in the corpus resisted the two-way split. The three-clause rule resolves one and does not
resolve the other; both are recorded so an author meeting a third one knows which kind it is.
**`git-worktrees/SKILL.md`'s tracking row carries both spellings in one Run cell** — `rtk git
worktree add --track -b <branch> <path> <remote>/<branch>` — always correct. `git worktree add
<path> <branch>` expands to exactly this. **Resolved: the clauses apply per mention, not per row,
per cell or per file.** The first is the instruction (clause 1), the second names what the first
expands to (clause 2), and one table cell can hold one of each. The rule needed no change; the
*gate* did, and it checks only a Run cell's opening span for exactly this reason.
**`git-submodules/references/setup-and-update.md:80` has a git command inside a quoted argument to
another command** — `rtk git submodule foreach 'git pull origin main || :'`. **Not resolved: all
three clauses describe a command the reading agent executes, and the inner `git pull` is not one.**
It is the literal text of an argument that `git submodule foreach` hands to a subshell running inside
each submodule's own working tree, where the local convention does not reach. The file already gets
this right and already justifies it in prose two lines below ("the git calls in it are the
submodule's own — that is the one place a bare `git` is correct"). **An author meeting this shape
should do the same: leave the inner command bare and justify it inline.** It is deliberately not
promoted to a fourth clause on one instance. The gate does not decide it either — it happens to pass
this line, because the segment containing the inner command begins with `rtk`, and that is an
accident of the split rather than an understanding of quoting.
## Consequences
Eleven sites in `plugins/git/.apm/skills/**` revert to bare `git` under clause 3, each carrying a
short inline reason. Eight sites across `plugins/gitea/.apm/skills/**` and
`plugins/gitea/.apm/agents/gitea-orchestrate.agent.md` gain the prefix under clause 1, and one in
`pc-run/SKILL.md` that the #130 sweep's grep missed because the backtick opens with `SKIP=` rather
than `git `. `plugins/git/README.md`'s Conventions section becomes a pointer here, minus a paragraph
that was false about the `gitea-*` skills and a citation to a file that does not carry the rule.
A `check-rtk-prefix` pre-commit hook and `tests/test-check-rtk-prefix.sh` land with it; the test runs
the gate against the pre-sweep corpus on `main` and asserts it fails there, because a gate that only
passes on the fixed tree proves nothing about the drift it was written for.
+2 -1
View File
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ All skills — new and rebuilt — must follow this standard:
- `name:` — matches directory name
- `description:` — trigger-tested before writing the body (explicit, implicit, negative cases)
- `metadata: category:` — from the category table above
- `metadata: version:` — mandatory for every skill (ADR-0022)
`version:`, `updated:`, `when:`, `source:`, and `references:` are provenance/audit fields — they live in `META.md` alongside the SKILL.md (not in frontmatter). See `META-TEMPLATE.md` in `.agents/skills/write-skill/` for the META.md schema.
**Body required sections:**
- Constraints (highest-ROI element — prevents overengineering)
+10 -9
View File
@@ -103,21 +103,21 @@ Do not write the SKILL.md until the human has confirmed every section. The synth
**c. SKILL.md** (sub-agent)
Once all sections are confirmed, spawn a write agent to produce the SKILL.md using `write-skill` (or hand-write for bootstrap skills). The agent receives: trigger description, per-section decisions from step b, upstream content to incorporate, authoring standard (see below).
**d. Provenance — source and reference records**
Record provenance after upstream review. Two distinct kinds:
- Upstream provenance (repo slug, commit SHA, files adopted with inline comments, updated date). Present only if content was adopted. Absence = self-authored.
- General citations (research papers, documentation, standard specifications). Present only if the skill cites external research.
**c. META.md — `source:` and `references:` fields**
Populate `META.md` after upstream review. Two distinct fields:
- `source:` — upstream provenance tracking (repo slug, commit SHA, files adopted with inline comments, updated date). Present only if content was adopted. Absence = self-authored.
- `references:` — general citations (research papers, documentation, standard specifications). Present only if the skill cites external research.
Both are recorded in the skill's own `references/sources.md`, keyed by the `source_keys:` its SKILL.md and reference files declare. `validate-provenance.sh` checks that chain.
Both fields live in `META.md` alongside the SKILL.md — not in frontmatter. See `META-TEMPLATE.md` in `.agents/skills/write-skill/` for the full schema.
**e. eval.yaml** (sub-agent)
**d. eval.yaml** (sub-agent)
Invoke `write-eval` in two steps to preserve its confirmation gate:
1. Sub-agent proposes test cases and returns the plan to the main conversation.
2. Human confirms the plan; then sub-agent writes the file.
Do not pass pre-designed test cases directly to a write agent — that collapses the plan-then-confirm gate into a single step, bypassing write-eval's own constraint. Co-located at `.agents/evals/<category>/<skill-name>/eval.yaml`. Must contain all five required test types (see Eval schema below).
**f. HITL behavioral test**
**e. HITL behavioral test**
Human opens a fresh Claude session, invokes the skill with its trigger phrase, and verifies output. Do not batch more than 2–3 skills before running behavioral tests — output volume must stay within genuine human review capacity. An approval that cannot be meaningfully evaluated is not an approval.
### Step 6 — Session handoff
@@ -157,11 +157,12 @@ name: skill-name
description: <trigger description — routing only; written and tested first; max 1024 chars>
metadata:
category: <design|factory|implement|test|review|deploy|operate|cross-cutting|iac>
version: <semver — mandatory for every skill; see ADR-0022>
# allowed-tools: <add only when the skill has a narrow, well-defined tool surface; omit otherwise>
---
```
Frontmatter contains only these fields. `version`, `updated`, `when`, `source`, and `references` are provenance/audit fields — they are not used for routing or runtime execution. They live in `META.md` alongside the SKILL.md, loaded only when needed. See `META-TEMPLATE.md` in `.agents/skills/write-skill/` for the META.md schema.
### Body sections
Use `.agents/skills/write-skill/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md` as the authoritative structure reference. The template defines the required sections, correct order, XML grouping, and placeholder comments for each section.
@@ -229,6 +230,6 @@ Upstream review happens per-skill during step 2, not once at chunk start.
## Open decisions carried forward
- **Bidirectional reference convention** — Chunk 4 (reference scanner tooling; reverse map "what files point to X?").
- **Bidirectional reference convention** — Chunk 4 (reference scanner tooling; reverse map "what files point to X?"). The `when:` field itself is resolved — it lives in `META.md` alongside every skill.
- **PRD/issue template scope** — refined during `write-prd` (0020) and `write-issue-spec` (0019) implementation
- **Merging `zoom-out` into architect role** — revisit at Chunk 5 grill
-7
View File
@@ -49,13 +49,6 @@ Two compilers produce the plugin roots you see in the tree:
`.apm/` is the sole hand-edited authoring source for plugin content. An edit made in the flat mirror is discarded by the next sync and is reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook. Hand-authored material that is not an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json`, and per-plugin extras such as `plugins/git/config.example.json`, `plugins/gitea/references/` and `plugins/bin/evals/` — lives at the plugin **root** and is untouched by either compiler.
`.mcp.json` is the one entry in that list that is still load-bearing for apm rather than merely ignored by it. MCP is a first-class apm primitive — `dependencies.mcp` sits beside `dependencies.apm` in the manifest schema, and apm tracks deployed servers in `apm.lock.yaml` under `mcp_servers`, `mcp_configs` and `mcp_config_provenance`. A plugin reaches that primitive indirectly. `apm pack` writes the string `".mcp.json"` into the generated `.github/plugin/plugin.json` as its `mcpServers` value, and on install apm resolves the plugin manifest in the order `plugin.json`, `.github/plugin/plugin.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` — so the Copilot manifest wins, the pointer is followed, and `.mcp.json` is injected into the package's `dependencies.mcp` with any `${VAR}` env references intact. Verified against the real remote: a git-sourced install of `plugins/gitea` deploys the gitea server with both env references unexpanded.
Two consequences follow, and both have bitten already:
- **Do not declare `dependencies.mcp` in a plugin's own `apm.yml`.** It is the schema-correct place and it breaks the build. The `apm-audit-ci` pre-push hook runs `apm audit --ci` inside every `plugins/*/`, so a declared dependency arms `lockfile-exists` there, which then demands an `apm.lock.yaml` in the package plus every file of that package's own deployed tree present inside the package directory. Measured on `plugins/gitea`: 93 missing deployed files and 79 drifted paths.
- **`.claude-plugin/plugin.json` carries an env-stripped copy.** `apm pack` inlines `.mcp.json` there, and its sanitiser drops `env` and `headers` blocks unconditionally at any depth, `${VAR}` indirection included. That copy is inert under apm, which never reaches it, but a native Claude Code plugin install reads exactly that file and would launch the server with no credentials. Anything installed natively rather than through apm needs its MCP env supplied by the host.
That immunity is positional, not by filename. Anything placed *inside* a mirrored directory is destroyed regardless of what it is: `sync_dir` runs `rm -rf "$dst"` before every copy, and `sync_hooks_json` does the same to `hooks/`. A hand-written `README.md` under `plugins/<name>/hooks/` or `plugins/<name>/skills/` is deleted by the next sync with no drift report, because a file with no `.apm/` counterpart is simply absent from the regenerated tree. This has already cost the repo one document — `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/README.md`, since restored to `plugins/kyberforge/docs/hooks.md`. Plugin-root documentation belongs in `docs/`.
## Governance layer
+7 -156
View File
@@ -128,43 +128,12 @@ not an authoring change.
### `skill-frontmatter`, the other hook on that scope
A second `repo: local` pre-commit hook, `skill-frontmatter`, runs on the **same** `files:` pattern at
the same stage. It is a shell loop that, **for the YAML frontmatter block only** — everything between
the opening `---` and the next `---` — asserts four things per file:
the same stage. It is a short shell loop: for each file, `grep -q "^name:"` and
`grep -q "^description:"`, failing with "missing required frontmatter fields" if either is absent.
| Check | Rejects with |
|---|---|
| a `^name:` line is present | "missing required frontmatter fields (name: …)" |
| a `^description:` line is present | "missing required frontmatter fields (description: …)" |
| `metadata:` contains a `^ version:` key, anchored, scanning to the next top-level key | "missing required frontmatter fields (metadata.version)" |
| that version's value is three-part semver (`1.0.0`, quoted or not) | "has a malformed frontmatter metadata.version (…)" |
Every one of those qualifiers is load-bearing, and each replaced a defect that let the hook report
Passed having measured nothing. `tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh` pins all of them:
- **Frontmatter-scoped, not whole-file.** The checks used to `grep` the entire file, so a `metadata:`
or `name:` block quoted in a **body code fence** satisfied them — `skill-author`'s own docs quote
exactly such a block.
- **Bounded by the next top-level key, not by `-A10`.** The version check was
`grep -A10 "^metadata:" | grep -q " version:"`, which ran ten lines past the end of the block: a
`version:` belonging to a following `source:` list entry counted (`write-docs` and `research` both
have a `source:` list immediately after `metadata:`), while a `metadata:` block with more than ten
lines before its `version:` was reported missing.
- **`^ version:` anchored.** `" version:"` was an unanchored substring, so a deeper-nested
` version:` matched too.
- **The value is asserted, not just the key.** `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/write-docs/SKILL.md` carried
`version: "1.0"` — present, correctly nested, and not a version — through an entire PR under a
presence-only check. Two-part `1.0` is a YAML float, not a version string.
- **The call shape is pinned.** `entry: bash` with `args: ['-c', <script>, …]` needs an explicit
arg0 placeholder after the script: without it `bash -c` puts pre-commit's **first** filename in
`$0`, where `for f in "$@"` never sees it. A single-file commit — the normal case — therefore ran
the loop body zero times and exited 0. The third `args` entry (`skill-frontmatter`) exists solely
to absorb `$0`; do not remove it.
- **An unreadable file is an error, not a pass.** A file with no closing `---` fails with "no closing
YAML frontmatter block" rather than falling through to a green.
**It still overlaps ADR-0020's "description present and non-empty" FAIL, and the overlap is not
clean.** The ADR (`:95-101`) requires that question be decided on the **YAML-folded value** and
nowhere else, precisely because a line regex gets it wrong in both directions. Measured on fixtures:
**It overlaps ADR-0020's "description present and non-empty" FAIL, and the overlap is not clean.**
The ADR (`:95-101`) requires that question be decided on the **YAML-folded value** and nowhere else,
precisely because a line regex gets it wrong in both directions. Measured on fixtures:
| Frontmatter | `skill-frontmatter` | `skill-size-check` |
|---|---|---|
@@ -176,34 +145,10 @@ against, and it is the only one of the two that objects to a quoted key. Neither
currently live in the corpus, and the honest reading is that presence is `skill-size-check`'s
question — the grep's contribution to it is noise on one shape and silence on the other.
What the hook adds that **no** ADR-0020 check reads is two keys: `name:` and `metadata.version`. A
`SKILL.md` missing either passes `skill-size-check` at exit 0. That is its unique coverage, and the
What the grep does add is the `name:` key, which **no** ADR-0020 check reads: a `SKILL.md` with no
`name:` passes `skill-size-check` at exit 0. That is its real and only unique coverage, and the
reason not to fold it into the size gate on the grounds of redundancy.
#### Why this one stays a shell parser
[`python3` and PyYAML are hard requirements](#python3-and-pyyaml-are-hard-requirements) below records
that a hand-rolled frontmatter reader on this exact `files:` scope was **deliberately deleted**,
because "a reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file it never
measured." That reasoning is about `skill-size-check` and does **not** transfer here. Do not delete
this hook citing it. Three differences:
1. **It answers a strictly narrower question.** `skill-size-check` must know the *folded value* of a
`>`-block scalar to count its characters, which is where a line reader diverges from a parser —
one corpus description measured 270 characters parsed and 412 unparsed. This hook asks only
whether a key is on a line and whether one short **plain scalar** matches `N.N.N`. There is no
folding, no multi-line value, and no measurement to get subtly wrong.
2. **It is frontmatter-scoped.** The failure mode that killed the old fallback was silently reading
past or short of the block. This one extracts the block explicitly and errors out when it cannot
find a closing marker, so "could not parse" is a red, never a green.
3. **It is pinned by tests.** `tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh` drives the hook through pre-commit's
real `bash -c <script> <arg0> <files…>` invocation and asserts each defect class above. The
deleted fallback had no such suite; that is how its disagreement with a real parser survived.
The trade it buys is that the hook stays repo-local. Moving it to a script would change the
externally exposed `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` contract for consumers, for a check that has no need of a
YAML parser.
### Two independent gate families, neither replaced the other
**Family 1 — agentskills.io spec backstop** (unchanged, conformance not quality):
@@ -468,15 +413,6 @@ reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file
which is the exact vacuous-green failure the `python3` check exists to avoid. `pip install pyyaml`
(or `python3 -m pip install PyYAML`, or the distro's `python3-yaml`) if the hook reports it missing.
**Neither requirement generalises to every hook on this scope, and one deliberate exception sits
right next to it.** [`skill-frontmatter`](#skill-frontmatter-the-other-hook-on-that-scope) runs on the
same `files:` pattern as a **shell** parser, on purpose — it asks only whether a key is on a line and
whether one short plain scalar matches `N.N.N`, with no folding to get wrong, and moving it to a
script would change the externally exposed `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` contract for consumers. That
section carries the full argument. A reader arriving here first should not read this one as
condemning it. `check-rtk-prefix` needs `python3` but **not** PyYAML: it reads the markdown body and
never touches frontmatter, so it has no scalar to fold.
## Agent files take the description gates, not the body gate
`check-apm-agents-valid` runs agent-audit's `validate.sh` over every real
@@ -561,91 +497,6 @@ pre-commit run --all-files # size AND Vale
Scoping a retrofit off `skill-size-check` output alone leaves you blocked at the second gate.
## The `rtk` prefix gate (ADR-0023)
`check-rtk-prefix` is a `repo: local` pre-commit hook running `scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh` over
`^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/(skills/.*\.md|agents/.*\.agent\.md)$`, with `README.md` excluded. It enforces
**ADR-0023 clause 1 and nothing else**: an executable, instructed local git command in plugin skill
or agent content is written `rtk git`.
It is wider in file scope than the ADR-0020 hooks — every markdown file under a plugin's
`.apm/skills/` and `.apm/agents/`, not `SKILL.md` alone — because the rule it enforces is about
commands an agent runs, and most of those live in `references/`, which the ADR-0020 gates do not
reach ([the `references/` blind spot](#the-blind-spot-references-is-unlinted-for-two-independent-reasons)).
### What it can decide, and what it declines to
ADR-0023 has three clauses and only the first is a pattern:
| Clause | Rule | Gated |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | executable + instructed → `rtk git` | yes |
| 2 | illustrative / referential → bare `git` | no — undecidable |
| 3 | machine-parsed or interactive → bare `git` | no — opt-out marker |
Clause 2 is a judgement about what a sentence is *doing*. "Run `git switch <branch>`" and "`git
switch` refuses rather than clobbering local edits" are the same token sequence. A gate that guessed
would fire on correct prose, and **a gate that fires on correct content gets added to `SKIP`** —
which disarms clause 1 along with it. So the hook looks only at the two contexts where a `git`
mention is unambiguously an instruction to execute:
- a line inside a fenced code block whose info string names a shell — `bash`, `sh`, `shell`, `zsh`,
`console`, `shell-session`. Fences tagged `text`, `yaml`, `json`, or tagged with nothing, are **not**
checked;
- the **opening** backticked span of a "Run" column cell in a markdown dispatch table, and only the
opening span.
That last narrowing is not fussiness. A Run cell routinely carries a command followed by prose about
it, and the prose is clause 2. `git-worktrees/SKILL.md` has both shapes on adjacent rows — one cell
reading `` `rtk git worktree add --track …` `` — always correct. `` `git worktree add <path>
<branch>` `` expands to exactly this (instruction, then reference), and a `**Never** …` row whose Run
cell is entirely explanation containing a bare `git push`. Checking every backticked span flags both;
checking only a leading span flags neither, and still catches the ordinary
`` | List | `git worktree list -v` | `` case the gate exists for.
### The clause-3 opt-out
A command that is deliberately bare — because rtk rewrites the output the skill parses, or because
the command is interactive — is exempted by putting the literal string `ADR-0023` **on the same
line**: in a shell comment for a code line, in the cell text for a table row.
Per line, never per block. A fenced procedure routinely mixes `rtk git` steps with one deliberately
bare command (`git-remotes/references/push.md` does exactly that), and a block-level marker would
silently disarm every checked line around the marked one. The cost is a repeated `# bare per
ADR-0023` in the three blocks of `git-log-format.md` where every line is deliberately bare; that
repetition is the price of the marked line being the only line the marker speaks for.
The marker is a plain substring match, so a line that mentions `ADR-0023` for an unrelated reason is
also exempt. Accepted deliberately: the marker records an author's opt-out, it is not a security
boundary, and a stricter form would only move the same trust to a different string.
### What it deliberately does not cover
- **Clause 2.** Nothing checks that an illustrative mention stayed bare. A sweep that re-prefixes a
referential `git` passes this gate. The inline reasons ADR-0023 requires on clause-3 sites are the
only defence, and they are prose.
- **Prose bullets.** Most of `branch-operations.md`, `merging.md` and `rewrite-history.md` instruct
in list items, not fences. Those are clause-1 sites the gate cannot see, because it cannot
distinguish them from clause-2 mentions in the same list.
- **`README.md`, excluded by pattern.** A skill-directory README is consumer-facing prose no agent
loads, and the `git clone https://github.com/bats-core/…` lines in the seven `tests/README.md`
files are setup instructions for a third party who has no `rtk`. Prefixing those would be actively
wrong, not merely noisy — see ADR-0023's consumer section.
- **Quoting.** The line splitter breaks on `;`, `|`, `&&`, `||`, `$(` and backticks without tracking
quotes, so a git command inside a quoted argument is decided by accident.
`rtk git submodule foreach 'git pull origin main || :'` passes because the segment holding the
inner command begins with `rtk` — the right answer for the wrong reason. Write
`foreach 'git a; git b'` and the second inner command is a false positive needing the marker.
ADR-0023 records this shape as one the rule itself does not decide.
- **Non-git commands.** Only `git` is checked. `rtk` fronts `gh`, `docker`, `kubectl` and others; no
gate covers those, and the corpus does not currently instruct them.
`tests/test-check-rtk-prefix.sh` pins all of it, including the false-positive cases. Its first case
reconstructs the plugin corpus as it stood on `main` before the #113 sweep and asserts the gate
fails there with at least 20 findings, one of them the `gitea-*` `git remote get-url origin` drift
the sweep missed — a gate that only passes on the already-fixed tree proves nothing about the drift
it was written for.
## Vale
Install the `vale` binary — `brew install vale` (macOS), `snap install vale` (Linux),
-2
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ disable-model-invocation: true
description: >
Ultra-compressed output mode that drops articles, filler and pleasantries while
keeping technical substance exact, cutting token usage by roughly 75%.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
Respond terse like smart caveman. All technical substance stay. Only fluff die.
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when the user says "diagnose this" or "debug this", reports something
broken, throwing, or failing, or says something got slow. Not filing or
triaging a reported bug -> `triage`. Not test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Diagnose
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ description: >
relentless interview — one question at a time, down each branch of the
decision tree. Not a plan to challenge against `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs ->
`grill-with-docs`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
@@ -4,11 +4,10 @@ The grilling interview, run against the project's domain model — and writing d
## What it does
Runs the same relentless one-question-at-a-time interview as `grill-me`, with the project's own documentation as an active participant. During codebase exploration it also locates the domain documentation — a root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`, or a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing at per-context glossaries and ADR directories in a multi-context repo — and then uses it five ways:
Runs the same relentless one-question-at-a-time interview as `grill-me`, with the project's own documentation as an active participant. During codebase exploration it also locates the domain documentation — a root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`, or a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing at per-context glossaries and ADR directories in a multi-context repo — and then uses it four ways:
- **Challenges terms against the glossary.** When the user's usage conflicts with what `CONTEXT.md` already defines, that is raised immediately rather than absorbed.
- **Sharpens fuzzy language** by proposing a precise canonical term ("you're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User?").
- **Stress-tests domain relationships with concrete scenarios**, inventing edge cases that force the user to be precise about where one concept ends and the next begins.
- **Cross-references claims against the code**, and surfaces contradictions between what the user says happens and what the code does.
- **Updates `CONTEXT.md` inline**, the moment a term is resolved, rather than batching changes to the end of the session where they get lost.
@@ -32,6 +31,6 @@ Describe the plan or design. Expect questions one at a time, each with a recomme
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | The interview instruction plus the domain-awareness rules: file layout discovery, the five during-session behaviours, and the three-part ADR test |
| `references/context-format.md` | Cited when a term is resolved: the structure of a `CONTEXT.md` and how to write a Language entry |
| `references/adr-format.md` | Cited when an ADR is offered: `docs/adr/` naming, sequential numbering, and the ADR template |
| `SKILL.md` | The interview instruction plus the domain-awareness rules: file layout discovery, the four during-session behaviours, and the three-part ADR test |
| `CONTEXT-FORMAT.md` | Skill-root document, cited when a term is resolved: the structure of a `CONTEXT.md` and how to write a Language entry |
| `ADR-FORMAT.md` | Skill-root document, cited when an ADR is offered: `docs/adr/` naming, sequential numbering, and the ADR template |
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when a plan should be stress-tested against the project's domain model —
the interview challenges terms against `CONTEXT.md` and writes decisions into
it and into ADRs as they land. Not a plain interview -> `grill-me`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
<what-to-do>
@@ -76,7 +74,7 @@ When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you
### Update CONTEXT.md inline
When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [context-format.md](references/context-format.md).
When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./CONTEXT-FORMAT.md).
Don't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
@@ -88,6 +86,6 @@ Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [adr-format.md](references/adr-format.md).
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md).
</supporting-info>
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Deepening
How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
## Dependency categories
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
When the user wants to explore alternative interfaces for a chosen deepening candidate, use this parallel sub-agent pattern. Based on "Design It Twice" (Ousterhout) — your first idea is unlikely to be the best.
Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
Uses the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
## Process
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**,
Before spawning sub-agents, write a user-facing explanation of the problem space for the chosen candidate:
- The constraints any new interface would need to satisfy
- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
- A rough illustrative code sketch to ground the constraints — not a proposal, just a way to make the constraints concrete
Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and thinks while the sub-agents work in parallel.
@@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and th
Spawn 3+ sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each must produce a **radically different** interface for the deepened module.
Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [deepening.md](deepening.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
- Agent 1: "Minimize the interface — aim for 1–3 entry points max. Maximise leverage per entry point."
- Agent 2: "Maximise flexibility — support many use cases and extension."
- Agent 3: "Optimise for the most common caller — make the default case trivial."
- Agent 4 (if applicable): "Design around ports & adapters for cross-seam dependencies."
Include both [language.md](language.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
Include both [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
Each sub-agent outputs:
1. Interface (types, methods, params — plus invariants, ordering, error modes)
2. Usage example showing how callers use it
3. What the implementation hides behind the seam
4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
5. Trade-offs — where leverage is high, where it's thin
### 3. Present and compare
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Looks for places where a codebase is hard to understand, hard to test, or hard f
2. **Present candidates.** A numbered list, each with files, problem, solution and benefits — benefits stated in terms of *locality* and *leverage* and of how tests would improve. No interfaces are proposed yet; the user picks one.
3. **Grilling loop.** Walks the design tree for the chosen candidate, with documentation side effects landing inline as decisions crystallise.
The skill is opinionated about vocabulary, and that is the point: **module, interface, implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality**, used exactly, with no drift into "component", "service", "API" or "boundary". Domain nouns come from `CONTEXT.md`, architecture nouns from `references/language.md` — so a proposal reads as "the Order intake module", never "the FooBarHandler".
The skill is opinionated about vocabulary, and that is the point: **module, interface, implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality**, used exactly, with no drift into "component", "service", "API" or "boundary". Domain nouns come from `CONTEXT.md`, architecture nouns from `LANGUAGE.md` — so a proposal reads as "the Order intake module", never "the FooBarHandler".
ADRs are treated as decisions not to be re-litigated. A candidate that contradicts one is surfaced only when the friction is real enough to warrant reopening it, and is marked as such.
@@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ Point at a codebase or an area of one. Expect a numbered candidate list and a "w
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | Condensed glossary, key principles, and the three-stage process |
| `references/language.md` | Cited throughout `SKILL.md`: full definitions of every term, the words each one replaces, and the full principle list |
| `references/interface-design.md` | Read at stage 3 when the user wants alternative interfaces explored: the parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern, framing the problem space, and the per-agent design constraints |
| `references/deepening.md` | Cited from `references/interface-design.md`: how to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, the four dependency categories (in-process, local-substitutable, remote-but-owned, true external), seam discipline, and the replace-don't-layer testing strategy |
| `LANGUAGE.md` | Skill-root document, cited throughout `SKILL.md`: full definitions of every term, the words each one replaces, and the full principle list |
| `INTERFACE-DESIGN.md` | Skill-root document, read at stage 3 when the user wants alternative interfaces explored: the parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern, framing the problem space, and the per-agent design constraints |
| `DEEPENING.md` | Skill-root document, cited from `INTERFACE-DESIGN.md`: how to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, the four dependency categories (in-process, local-substitutable, remote-but-owned, true external), seam discipline, and the replace-don't-layer testing strategy |
@@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
---
name: improve-codebase-architecture
description: >
Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring
opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more
testable and AI-navigable — deepening opportunities that turn shallow modules
into deep ones, informed by `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a
failure -> `diagnose`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
Use when the user wants a codebase's architecture improved — deepening
opportunities that turn shallow modules into deep ones, informed by
`CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a failure -> `diagnose`. Not
test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
---
# Improve Codebase Architecture
@@ -16,7 +13,7 @@ Surface architectural friction and propose **deepening opportunities** — refac
## Glossary
Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary."
Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Full definitions in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md).
- **Module** — anything with an interface and an implementation (function, class, package, slice).
- **Interface** — everything a caller must know to use the module: types, invariants, error modes, ordering, config. Not just the type signature.
@@ -27,14 +24,12 @@ Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point
- **Leverage** — what callers get from depth.
- **Locality** — what maintainers get from depth: change, bugs, knowledge concentrated in one place.
Key principles:
Key principles (see [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) for the full list):
- **Deletion test**: imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
- **The interface is the test surface.**
- **One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam.**
If a term or principle above is ambiguous in the case in front of you, or you need the definitions and the principles the two lists leave out, read `references/language.md`.
This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate.
## Process
@@ -62,7 +57,7 @@ Present a numbered list of deepening opportunities. For each candidate:
- **Solution** — plain English description of what would change
- **Benefits** — explained in terms of locality and leverage, and also in how tests would improve
**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and the architecture glossary above for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
**ADR conflicts**: if a candidate contradicts an existing ADR, only surface it when the friction is real enough to warrant revisiting the ADR. Mark it clearly (e.g. _"contradicts ADR-0007 — but worth reopening because…"_). Don't list every theoretical refactor an ADR forbids.
@@ -74,7 +69,7 @@ Once the user picks a candidate, drop into a grilling conversation. Walk the des
Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `references/context-format.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `CONTEXT-FORMAT.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
- **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `CONTEXT.md` right there.
- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `references/adr-format.md`.
- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** Read `references/interface-design.md`.
- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `ADR-FORMAT.md`.
- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** See [INTERFACE-DESIGN.md](INTERFACE-DESIGN.md).
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ description: >
a data model, state machine or business logic, or to mock up a UI in several
variations. Not production code -> `tdd`. Not talking a design through ->
`grill-me`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Prototype
@@ -72,8 +72,5 @@ When the prototype has done its job, the answer to the question is the only thin
## Anti-patterns
- **Don't add tests.** A prototype that needs tests is no longer a prototype.
- **Don't wire it to the real database.** Use an in-memory store unless the question is specifically about persistence.
- **Don't generalise.** No "what if we wanted to support X later." The prototype answers one question.
- **Don't blur the logic and the TUI together.** If the reducer / state machine references `console.log`, prompts, or terminal escape codes, it's no longer portable. Keep the TUI as a thin shell over a pure module.
- **Don't ship the TUI shell into production.** The shell is optimised for being driven by hand from a terminal. The logic module behind it is the bit worth keeping.
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >-
documentation written from existing code or specs -> `write-docs`. Not a bug
or incident -> `diagnose`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
category: research
allowed-tools:
- Grep
+5 -5
View File
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ Describe the feature or bug. Expect the skill to ask what the public interface s
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | Philosophy, the horizontal-slicing anti-pattern, the four-stage workflow, and the per-cycle checklist |
| `references/tests.md` | Cited from Philosophy: worked good and bad test examples |
| `references/mocking.md` | Cited from Philosophy: mock at system boundaries only, and what not to mock |
| `references/deep-modules.md` | Cited from stage 1: what a deep module is (small interface, large implementation) and why it is the design to aim for |
| `references/interface-design.md` | Cited from stage 1: designing interfaces for testability, starting with accepting dependencies rather than creating them |
| `references/refactoring.md` | Cited from stage 4: the refactor-candidate checklist — duplication, long methods, shallow modules, feature envy, primitive obsession |
| `tests.md` | Skill-root document, cited from Philosophy: worked good and bad test examples |
| `mocking.md` | Skill-root document, cited from Philosophy: mock at system boundaries only, and what not to mock |
| `deep-modules.md` | Skill-root document, cited from stage 1: what a deep module is (small interface, large implementation) and why it is the design to aim for |
| `interface-design.md` | Skill-root document, cited from stage 1: designing interfaces for testability, starting with accepting dependencies rather than creating them |
| `refactoring.md` | Skill-root document, cited from stage 4: the refactor-candidate checklist — duplication, long methods, shallow modules, feature envy, primitive obsession |
+4 -6
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when the user wants a feature built or a bug fixed test-first, in a strict
red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time. Not diagnosing an existing
bug -> `diagnose`. Not throwaway exploratory code -> `prototype`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Test-Driven Development
@@ -18,7 +16,7 @@ metadata:
**Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.
If you need worked examples of the difference — a behaviour-level test beside the implementation-coupled version of the same check — read `references/tests.md`. If a test needs a collaborator faked, read `references/mocking.md` before reaching for a mock.
See [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.
## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices
@@ -55,8 +53,8 @@ Before writing any code:
- [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed
- [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)
- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](references/deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](references/interface-design.md)
- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](interface-design.md)
- [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)
- [ ] Get user approval on the plan
@@ -93,7 +91,7 @@ Rules:
### 4. Refactor
After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](references/refactoring.md):
After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](refactoring.md):
- [ ] Extract duplication
- [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)
+3 -3
View File
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ A run does one of three things depending on what the maintainer asks for:
- **Triage a specific issue** — gather context (including prior triage notes, so resolved questions are not re-asked, and `.out-of-scope/` records that resemble the issue), recommend a category and state with reasoning, attempt reproduction for bugs *before* any grilling, run a `grill-with-docs` session if the issue needs fleshing out, then apply the outcome.
- **Quick state override** — "move #42 to ready-for-agent" is trusted and applied directly, skipping grilling, after confirming the exact changes.
Two hard rules: every comment or issue the skill posts during triage must open with the AI-generated disclaimer, and the canonical role names above are *not* necessarily the label strings in the tracker — each is resolved against the tracker's live label set before it is applied, and a name with no counterpart there is reported to the maintainer as a gap rather than guessed at.
Two hard rules: every comment or issue the skill posts during triage must open with the AI-generated disclaimer, and the canonical role names above are *not* necessarily the label strings in the tracker — the mapping has to be supplied to the run.
## Composition
@@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ Then describe what you want in natural language — "show me anything that needs
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | The roles and state machine, the three invocation modes, the needs-info template, and how to resume a prior session |
| `references/agent-brief.md` | Cited when an issue moves to `ready-for-agent` (and reused for `ready-for-human`): how to write a brief that stays durable for weeks while the codebase moves under it — describe interfaces and behavioural contracts, not line numbers |
| `references/out-of-scope.md` | Cited when an enhancement is closed `wontfix` and when checking for prior rejections: how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base is laid out and what it is for — institutional memory, and deduplication against re-litigated requests |
| `AGENT-BRIEF.md` | Skill-root document, cited when an issue moves to `ready-for-agent` (and reused for `ready-for-human`): how to write a brief that stays durable for weeks while the codebase moves under it — describe interfaces and behavioural contracts, not line numbers |
| `OUT-OF-SCOPE.md` | Skill-root document, cited when an enhancement is closed `wontfix` and when checking for prior rejections: how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base is laid out and what it is for — institutional memory, and deduplication against re-litigated requests |
+4 -6
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when the user wants an issue created, triaged, or moved through the
tracker's triage states, or an issue prepared for an AFK agent. Not debugging
the bug itself -> `diagnose`. Not fleshing out a design -> `grill-with-docs`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Triage
@@ -20,8 +18,8 @@ Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start
## Reference docs
- [agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
- [out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
## Roles
@@ -74,11 +72,11 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
4. **Grill (if needed).** If the issue needs fleshing out, run a `/grill-with-docs` session.
5. **Apply the outcome:**
- `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md)).
- `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).
- `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
- `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
- `wontfix` (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
- `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md)).
- `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).
- `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
## Quick state override
+5 -8
View File
@@ -2,14 +2,12 @@
name: write-docs
description: >
Use when the user wants technical documentation produced or updated from code
or spec, every claim traced to a source — "write docs for X", "document this
module", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this". Not an ADR
or other decision record -> `grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched
from its docs -> `research`.
or spec, every claim traced to a source. Not a PRD, ADR, or decision doc ->
`grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched from its docs -> `research`.
version: "1.0"
updated: 2026-05-17
when: invoked by explicit trigger ("write docs for X", "document this module", "create docs for this feature") or implicit request to produce technical documentation from code or spec
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
category: implement
source:
- repo: anthropics/skills
@@ -40,8 +38,7 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
- User says "write docs for X", "document this", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this"
**Do not use when:**
- User wants an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-with-docs`, which writes ADRs
- User wants a PRD → no skill in this set produces one; say so rather than redirecting
- User wants a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-me` or `grill-with-docs`
- User wants to document a skill file (skill files are self-describing)
- User wants marketing or blog copy
- Documentation requires tacit organisational knowledge that cannot be read from code or spec
@@ -94,7 +91,7 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
- Stage skipped without a logged reason → flag and require the one-sentence log before continuing
- Code behaviour is undocumentable (internal implementation detail, no public spec) → note as out-of-scope in the doc; do not invent an explanation
- Reader Testing sub-agent fails on multiple questions → surface the failures, return to step 4; do not mark complete
- Requested output is an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-with-docs`; for a PRD, say no skill here produces one instead of redirecting
- Requested output is a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-me` or `grill-with-docs`
## Self-check
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
name: zoom-out
description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
disable-model-invocation: true
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "bin",
"version": "1.1.7",
"version": "1.2.0",
"description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
"author": {
"name": "Defame1297",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "bin",
"version": "1.1.7",
"version": "1.2.0",
"description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
"author": {
"name": "Defame1297",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: bin
version: 1.1.7
version: 1.2.0
description: Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.
author:
name: Defame1297
-2
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ disable-model-invocation: true
description: >
Ultra-compressed output mode that drops articles, filler and pleasantries while
keeping technical substance exact, cutting token usage by roughly 75%.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
Respond terse like smart caveman. All technical substance stay. Only fluff die.
-2
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when the user says "diagnose this" or "debug this", reports something
broken, throwing, or failing, or says something got slow. Not filing or
triaging a reported bug -> `triage`. Not test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Diagnose
-2
View File
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ description: >
relentless interview — one question at a time, down each branch of the
decision tree. Not a plan to challenge against `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs ->
`grill-with-docs`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
+4 -5
View File
@@ -4,11 +4,10 @@ The grilling interview, run against the project's domain model — and writing d
## What it does
Runs the same relentless one-question-at-a-time interview as `grill-me`, with the project's own documentation as an active participant. During codebase exploration it also locates the domain documentation — a root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`, or a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing at per-context glossaries and ADR directories in a multi-context repo — and then uses it five ways:
Runs the same relentless one-question-at-a-time interview as `grill-me`, with the project's own documentation as an active participant. During codebase exploration it also locates the domain documentation — a root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`, or a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing at per-context glossaries and ADR directories in a multi-context repo — and then uses it four ways:
- **Challenges terms against the glossary.** When the user's usage conflicts with what `CONTEXT.md` already defines, that is raised immediately rather than absorbed.
- **Sharpens fuzzy language** by proposing a precise canonical term ("you're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User?").
- **Stress-tests domain relationships with concrete scenarios**, inventing edge cases that force the user to be precise about where one concept ends and the next begins.
- **Cross-references claims against the code**, and surfaces contradictions between what the user says happens and what the code does.
- **Updates `CONTEXT.md` inline**, the moment a term is resolved, rather than batching changes to the end of the session where they get lost.
@@ -32,6 +31,6 @@ Describe the plan or design. Expect questions one at a time, each with a recomme
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | The interview instruction plus the domain-awareness rules: file layout discovery, the five during-session behaviours, and the three-part ADR test |
| `references/context-format.md` | Cited when a term is resolved: the structure of a `CONTEXT.md` and how to write a Language entry |
| `references/adr-format.md` | Cited when an ADR is offered: `docs/adr/` naming, sequential numbering, and the ADR template |
| `SKILL.md` | The interview instruction plus the domain-awareness rules: file layout discovery, the four during-session behaviours, and the three-part ADR test |
| `CONTEXT-FORMAT.md` | Skill-root document, cited when a term is resolved: the structure of a `CONTEXT.md` and how to write a Language entry |
| `ADR-FORMAT.md` | Skill-root document, cited when an ADR is offered: `docs/adr/` naming, sequential numbering, and the ADR template |
+2 -4
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when a plan should be stress-tested against the project's domain model —
the interview challenges terms against `CONTEXT.md` and writes decisions into
it and into ADRs as they land. Not a plain interview -> `grill-me`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
<what-to-do>
@@ -76,7 +74,7 @@ When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you
### Update CONTEXT.md inline
When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [context-format.md](references/context-format.md).
When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./CONTEXT-FORMAT.md).
Don't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
@@ -88,6 +86,6 @@ Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [adr-format.md](references/adr-format.md).
If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md).
</supporting-info>
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Deepening
How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
## Dependency categories
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
When the user wants to explore alternative interfaces for a chosen deepening candidate, use this parallel sub-agent pattern. Based on "Design It Twice" (Ousterhout) — your first idea is unlikely to be the best.
Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
Uses the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
## Process
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**,
Before spawning sub-agents, write a user-facing explanation of the problem space for the chosen candidate:
- The constraints any new interface would need to satisfy
- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
- A rough illustrative code sketch to ground the constraints — not a proposal, just a way to make the constraints concrete
Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and thinks while the sub-agents work in parallel.
@@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and th
Spawn 3+ sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each must produce a **radically different** interface for the deepened module.
Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [deepening.md](deepening.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
- Agent 1: "Minimize the interface — aim for 1–3 entry points max. Maximise leverage per entry point."
- Agent 2: "Maximise flexibility — support many use cases and extension."
- Agent 3: "Optimise for the most common caller — make the default case trivial."
- Agent 4 (if applicable): "Design around ports & adapters for cross-seam dependencies."
Include both [language.md](language.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
Include both [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
Each sub-agent outputs:
1. Interface (types, methods, params — plus invariants, ordering, error modes)
2. Usage example showing how callers use it
3. What the implementation hides behind the seam
4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
5. Trade-offs — where leverage is high, where it's thin
### 3. Present and compare
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Looks for places where a codebase is hard to understand, hard to test, or hard f
2. **Present candidates.** A numbered list, each with files, problem, solution and benefits — benefits stated in terms of *locality* and *leverage* and of how tests would improve. No interfaces are proposed yet; the user picks one.
3. **Grilling loop.** Walks the design tree for the chosen candidate, with documentation side effects landing inline as decisions crystallise.
The skill is opinionated about vocabulary, and that is the point: **module, interface, implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality**, used exactly, with no drift into "component", "service", "API" or "boundary". Domain nouns come from `CONTEXT.md`, architecture nouns from `references/language.md` — so a proposal reads as "the Order intake module", never "the FooBarHandler".
The skill is opinionated about vocabulary, and that is the point: **module, interface, implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality**, used exactly, with no drift into "component", "service", "API" or "boundary". Domain nouns come from `CONTEXT.md`, architecture nouns from `LANGUAGE.md` — so a proposal reads as "the Order intake module", never "the FooBarHandler".
ADRs are treated as decisions not to be re-litigated. A candidate that contradicts one is surfaced only when the friction is real enough to warrant reopening it, and is marked as such.
@@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ Point at a codebase or an area of one. Expect a numbered candidate list and a "w
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | Condensed glossary, key principles, and the three-stage process |
| `references/language.md` | Cited throughout `SKILL.md`: full definitions of every term, the words each one replaces, and the full principle list |
| `references/interface-design.md` | Read at stage 3 when the user wants alternative interfaces explored: the parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern, framing the problem space, and the per-agent design constraints |
| `references/deepening.md` | Cited from `references/interface-design.md`: how to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, the four dependency categories (in-process, local-substitutable, remote-but-owned, true external), seam discipline, and the replace-don't-layer testing strategy |
| `LANGUAGE.md` | Skill-root document, cited throughout `SKILL.md`: full definitions of every term, the words each one replaces, and the full principle list |
| `INTERFACE-DESIGN.md` | Skill-root document, read at stage 3 when the user wants alternative interfaces explored: the parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern, framing the problem space, and the per-agent design constraints |
| `DEEPENING.md` | Skill-root document, cited from `INTERFACE-DESIGN.md`: how to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, the four dependency categories (in-process, local-substitutable, remote-but-owned, true external), seam discipline, and the replace-don't-layer testing strategy |
@@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
---
name: improve-codebase-architecture
description: >
Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring
opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more
testable and AI-navigable — deepening opportunities that turn shallow modules
into deep ones, informed by `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a
failure -> `diagnose`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
Use when the user wants a codebase's architecture improved — deepening
opportunities that turn shallow modules into deep ones, informed by
`CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a failure -> `diagnose`. Not
test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
---
# Improve Codebase Architecture
@@ -16,7 +13,7 @@ Surface architectural friction and propose **deepening opportunities** — refac
## Glossary
Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary."
Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Full definitions in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md).
- **Module** — anything with an interface and an implementation (function, class, package, slice).
- **Interface** — everything a caller must know to use the module: types, invariants, error modes, ordering, config. Not just the type signature.
@@ -27,14 +24,12 @@ Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point
- **Leverage** — what callers get from depth.
- **Locality** — what maintainers get from depth: change, bugs, knowledge concentrated in one place.
Key principles:
Key principles (see [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) for the full list):
- **Deletion test**: imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
- **The interface is the test surface.**
- **One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam.**
If a term or principle above is ambiguous in the case in front of you, or you need the definitions and the principles the two lists leave out, read `references/language.md`.
This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate.
## Process
@@ -62,7 +57,7 @@ Present a numbered list of deepening opportunities. For each candidate:
- **Solution** — plain English description of what would change
- **Benefits** — explained in terms of locality and leverage, and also in how tests would improve
**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and the architecture glossary above for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
**ADR conflicts**: if a candidate contradicts an existing ADR, only surface it when the friction is real enough to warrant revisiting the ADR. Mark it clearly (e.g. _"contradicts ADR-0007 — but worth reopening because…"_). Don't list every theoretical refactor an ADR forbids.
@@ -74,7 +69,7 @@ Once the user picks a candidate, drop into a grilling conversation. Walk the des
Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `references/context-format.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `CONTEXT-FORMAT.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
- **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `CONTEXT.md` right there.
- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `references/adr-format.md`.
- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** Read `references/interface-design.md`.
- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `ADR-FORMAT.md`.
- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** See [INTERFACE-DESIGN.md](INTERFACE-DESIGN.md).
-2
View File
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ description: >
a data model, state machine or business logic, or to mock up a UI in several
variations. Not production code -> `tdd`. Not talking a design through ->
`grill-me`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Prototype
@@ -72,8 +72,5 @@ When the prototype has done its job, the answer to the question is the only thin
## Anti-patterns
- **Don't add tests.** A prototype that needs tests is no longer a prototype.
- **Don't wire it to the real database.** Use an in-memory store unless the question is specifically about persistence.
- **Don't generalise.** No "what if we wanted to support X later." The prototype answers one question.
- **Don't blur the logic and the TUI together.** If the reducer / state machine references `console.log`, prompts, or terminal escape codes, it's no longer portable. Keep the TUI as a thin shell over a pure module.
- **Don't ship the TUI shell into production.** The shell is optimised for being driven by hand from a terminal. The logic module behind it is the bit worth keeping.
-1
View File
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ description: >-
documentation written from existing code or specs -> `write-docs`. Not a bug
or incident -> `diagnose`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
category: research
allowed-tools:
- Grep
+5 -5
View File
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ Describe the feature or bug. Expect the skill to ask what the public interface s
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | Philosophy, the horizontal-slicing anti-pattern, the four-stage workflow, and the per-cycle checklist |
| `references/tests.md` | Cited from Philosophy: worked good and bad test examples |
| `references/mocking.md` | Cited from Philosophy: mock at system boundaries only, and what not to mock |
| `references/deep-modules.md` | Cited from stage 1: what a deep module is (small interface, large implementation) and why it is the design to aim for |
| `references/interface-design.md` | Cited from stage 1: designing interfaces for testability, starting with accepting dependencies rather than creating them |
| `references/refactoring.md` | Cited from stage 4: the refactor-candidate checklist — duplication, long methods, shallow modules, feature envy, primitive obsession |
| `tests.md` | Skill-root document, cited from Philosophy: worked good and bad test examples |
| `mocking.md` | Skill-root document, cited from Philosophy: mock at system boundaries only, and what not to mock |
| `deep-modules.md` | Skill-root document, cited from stage 1: what a deep module is (small interface, large implementation) and why it is the design to aim for |
| `interface-design.md` | Skill-root document, cited from stage 1: designing interfaces for testability, starting with accepting dependencies rather than creating them |
| `refactoring.md` | Skill-root document, cited from stage 4: the refactor-candidate checklist — duplication, long methods, shallow modules, feature envy, primitive obsession |
+4 -6
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when the user wants a feature built or a bug fixed test-first, in a strict
red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time. Not diagnosing an existing
bug -> `diagnose`. Not throwaway exploratory code -> `prototype`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Test-Driven Development
@@ -18,7 +16,7 @@ metadata:
**Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.
If you need worked examples of the difference — a behaviour-level test beside the implementation-coupled version of the same check — read `references/tests.md`. If a test needs a collaborator faked, read `references/mocking.md` before reaching for a mock.
See [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.
## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices
@@ -55,8 +53,8 @@ Before writing any code:
- [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed
- [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)
- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](references/deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](references/interface-design.md)
- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](interface-design.md)
- [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)
- [ ] Get user approval on the plan
@@ -93,7 +91,7 @@ Rules:
### 4. Refactor
After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](references/refactoring.md):
After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](refactoring.md):
- [ ] Extract duplication
- [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)
File renamed without changes.
+3 -3
View File
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ A run does one of three things depending on what the maintainer asks for:
- **Triage a specific issue** — gather context (including prior triage notes, so resolved questions are not re-asked, and `.out-of-scope/` records that resemble the issue), recommend a category and state with reasoning, attempt reproduction for bugs *before* any grilling, run a `grill-with-docs` session if the issue needs fleshing out, then apply the outcome.
- **Quick state override** — "move #42 to ready-for-agent" is trusted and applied directly, skipping grilling, after confirming the exact changes.
Two hard rules: every comment or issue the skill posts during triage must open with the AI-generated disclaimer, and the canonical role names above are *not* necessarily the label strings in the tracker — each is resolved against the tracker's live label set before it is applied, and a name with no counterpart there is reported to the maintainer as a gap rather than guessed at.
Two hard rules: every comment or issue the skill posts during triage must open with the AI-generated disclaimer, and the canonical role names above are *not* necessarily the label strings in the tracker — the mapping has to be supplied to the run.
## Composition
@@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ Then describe what you want in natural language — "show me anything that needs
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | The roles and state machine, the three invocation modes, the needs-info template, and how to resume a prior session |
| `references/agent-brief.md` | Cited when an issue moves to `ready-for-agent` (and reused for `ready-for-human`): how to write a brief that stays durable for weeks while the codebase moves under it — describe interfaces and behavioural contracts, not line numbers |
| `references/out-of-scope.md` | Cited when an enhancement is closed `wontfix` and when checking for prior rejections: how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base is laid out and what it is for — institutional memory, and deduplication against re-litigated requests |
| `AGENT-BRIEF.md` | Skill-root document, cited when an issue moves to `ready-for-agent` (and reused for `ready-for-human`): how to write a brief that stays durable for weeks while the codebase moves under it — describe interfaces and behavioural contracts, not line numbers |
| `OUT-OF-SCOPE.md` | Skill-root document, cited when an enhancement is closed `wontfix` and when checking for prior rejections: how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base is laid out and what it is for — institutional memory, and deduplication against re-litigated requests |
+4 -6
View File
@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ description: >
Use when the user wants an issue created, triaged, or moved through the
tracker's triage states, or an issue prepared for an AFK agent. Not debugging
the bug itself -> `diagnose`. Not fleshing out a design -> `grill-with-docs`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
# Triage
@@ -20,8 +18,8 @@ Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start
## Reference docs
- [agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
- [out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
## Roles
@@ -74,11 +72,11 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
4. **Grill (if needed).** If the issue needs fleshing out, run a `/grill-with-docs` session.
5. **Apply the outcome:**
- `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md)).
- `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).
- `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
- `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
- `wontfix` (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
- `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md)).
- `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).
- `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
## Quick state override
+5 -8
View File
@@ -2,14 +2,12 @@
name: write-docs
description: >
Use when the user wants technical documentation produced or updated from code
or spec, every claim traced to a source — "write docs for X", "document this
module", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this". Not an ADR
or other decision record -> `grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched
from its docs -> `research`.
or spec, every claim traced to a source. Not a PRD, ADR, or decision doc ->
`grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched from its docs -> `research`.
version: "1.0"
updated: 2026-05-17
when: invoked by explicit trigger ("write docs for X", "document this module", "create docs for this feature") or implicit request to produce technical documentation from code or spec
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
category: implement
source:
- repo: anthropics/skills
@@ -40,8 +38,7 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
- User says "write docs for X", "document this", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this"
**Do not use when:**
- User wants an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-with-docs`, which writes ADRs
- User wants a PRD → no skill in this set produces one; say so rather than redirecting
- User wants a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-me` or `grill-with-docs`
- User wants to document a skill file (skill files are self-describing)
- User wants marketing or blog copy
- Documentation requires tacit organisational knowledge that cannot be read from code or spec
@@ -94,7 +91,7 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
- Stage skipped without a logged reason → flag and require the one-sentence log before continuing
- Code behaviour is undocumentable (internal implementation detail, no public spec) → note as out-of-scope in the doc; do not invent an explanation
- Reader Testing sub-agent fails on multiple questions → surface the failures, return to step 4; do not mark complete
- Requested output is an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-with-docs`; for a PRD, say no skill here produces one instead of redirecting
- Requested output is a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-me` or `grill-with-docs`
## Self-check
-2
View File
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
name: zoom-out
description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
disable-model-invocation: true
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
---
I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ Then confirm `AGENTS.md` exists at the repo root. If it does not, stop and tell
Read the provider file and `AGENTS.md` side by side. Separate the provider file's content into two buckets: lines that restate what `AGENTS.md` already owns (universal rules, conventions, project overview) versus lines that are genuinely provider-specific (tool syntax, IDE behavior, model-specific instructions). Rewrite the provider file:
- **Providers with import syntax** (Claude Code): replace the redundant bucket with an `@AGENTS.md` (or correct relative path) import on a line of its own, keep the provider-specific bucket below it. An import folded into a sentence is not the thin-adapter shape and `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` will not credit it — nor one inside a code fence, an indented block, or an HTML comment, nor one whose path does not resolve to a real, non-empty file on disk.
- **Providers without import syntax** (Cursor, Copilot, etc.): replace the redundant bucket with a short sentence pointing at `AGENTS.md` ("See AGENTS.md at the repo root for ..."), keep the provider-specific bucket. A bare or negated mention is not a pointer and will not be credited.
- **Providers with import syntax** (Claude Code): replace the redundant bucket with an `@AGENTS.md` (or correct relative path) import on a line of its own, keep the provider-specific bucket below it. An import folded into a sentence is not the thin-adapter shape and `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` will not credit it.
- **Providers without import syntax** (Cursor, Copilot, etc.): replace the redundant bucket with a short pointer sentence mentioning `AGENTS.md`, keep the provider-specific bucket.
The provider file is the only file this skill ever writes. Never create or edit `AGENTS.md` — not in this step, not in any step, whatever the payoff looks like.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Run the bundled check before finishing — this is the skill's own closeout gate
bash scripts/validate-adapter.sh [--no-import-syntax] [--max-lines N] <adapter-file> <agents-md-file>
```
Fix any `FAIL` by editing the provider file, and re-run until it exits `0`. Exits `2` and `3` are not `FAIL`s and nothing was graded under either, so neither is a reason to touch the adapter: `2` means the invocation or the input is wrong (a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown option, or a file that is not UTF-8), and `3` means a named file exists but could not be read.
Fix any `FAIL` by editing the provider file, and re-run until it exits `0`. Exit `2` is not a `FAIL`: it means the invocation or the input is wrong — a bad or missing argument, or a file that is not UTF-8 — so fix that, not the adapter.
## Step 4 — Report
@@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ This skill is reached two ways: invoked directly by a user, and composed into by
once it has written or updated the repo's `AGENTS.md`. Behave identically either way — do not
assume a caller skill exists. Detect the provider file yourself, confirm `AGENTS.md` yourself, and
run the closeout validator yourself, rather than treating any step as already done by the caller or
as something the caller will do afterwards. No handshake exists to rely on, and no state is
passed in beyond the file paths.
as something the caller will do afterwards. There is no handshake to rely on and no state passed
in beyond the file paths.
@@ -4,25 +4,6 @@ Deterministic self-check this skill shells out to instead of relying on LLM judg
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `validate-adapter.sh` | Checks a rewritten provider file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) has a working reference to AGENTS.md, doesn't duplicate its content, and stays under a thin-file line threshold |
| `validate-adapter.sh` | Checks a rewritten provider file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) has a reference to AGENTS.md, doesn't duplicate its content, and stays under a thin-file line threshold |
Takes exactly `<adapter-file> <agents-md-file>`, with optional `--no-import-syntax` and `--max-lines N` flags (also accepted as `--max-lines=N`). A third positional argument or an unknown option is an error, not something quietly ignored.
## What counts as a reference to AGENTS.md
Both modes require the named path to be a real path segment ending in `AGENTS.md` — `AGENTS.md` or `…/AGENTS.md`, not `NOTAGENTS.md` — that resolves on disk, relative to the adapter file, to a non-empty file. An adapter deferring to a path that is not there defers to nothing, so the check has to touch the disk rather than pattern-match the line.
A reference only counts where something would actually resolve it. A line inside a fenced code block, an indented code block, or an HTML comment is not credited in either mode: Claude Code resolves an import in none of those, so a fenced `@AGENTS.md` is the silent-drop failure this gate exists to catch, not a pass.
Default mode wants a real import: `@AGENTS.md` alone on its own line, indented no more than three spaces. `--no-import-syntax` wants a prose pointer that reads as one — the sentence naming `AGENTS.md` must carry a deference cue (see, read, refer to, documented in, conventions, …) and must not be negated. `Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete.` and `We deleted AGENTS.md last year.` name the file while pointing the reader away from it, and neither is a pointer.
## Exit codes
The distinction matters because the skill's closeout tells the agent to fix any non-zero exit by editing the provider file. That is right for exactly one of these.
| Code | Meaning | What to do |
|------|---------|------------|
| `0` | Passes every check | Nothing |
| `1` | One or more `FAIL` findings printed to stdout — empty adapter, no working reference to AGENTS.md, excessive duplication, or not thin | Edit the provider file |
| `2` | Usage or input error: a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown option, a path that is not a file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing was graded, so there is no `FAIL` line | Fix the invocation or the file's encoding — do not edit the adapter |
| `3` | A named input file exists but could not be read (permissions, I/O error). Nothing was graded and the adapter's contents are unknown | Fix the file's readability — do not edit the adapter |
Takes `<adapter-file> <agents-md-file>`, with optional `--no-import-syntax` and `--max-lines N` flags. Prints `FAIL` findings to stdout and exits non-zero on any failure.
@@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ Arguments:
adapter-file Path to the provider-specific file to check.
agents-md-file Path to the AGENTS.md file it should defer to.
Exactly two positional arguments are accepted. Extra ones are rejected
rather than ignored: a third path silently graded nothing but the first
two, so a typo'd invocation passed against the wrong file.
Options:
--no-import-syntax The target provider has no native cross-file import
mechanism. Require a plain-text pointer line naming
@@ -30,69 +26,26 @@ Options:
it's considered no longer "thin". Must be a
non-negative integer. Default: 60.
--help, -h Show this help and exit 0.
-- End of options; every later argument is positional.
Both flags also accept the --flag=value form (--max-lines=40). An unknown
option is reported as an unknown option, not as a missing file.
What counts as a reference:
In both modes the named path must be a real path segment ending in
AGENTS.md ("AGENTS.md" or ".../AGENTS.md" — not NOTAGENTS.md), and it must
resolve on disk, relative to the adapter file, to a non-empty file. An
adapter deferring to a path that is not there defers to nothing.
A mention inside a fenced code block, an indented code block, or an HTML
comment is not credited in either mode. Nothing resolves those, so an
adapter whose only "import" is fenced silently defers to nothing.
With --no-import-syntax the pointer must read as a pointer: the sentence
naming AGENTS.md has to carry a deference cue (see, read, refer to,
documented in, conventions, ...) and must not be a negation ("do not read
AGENTS.md", "we deleted AGENTS.md"). A bare mention is not a pointer.
Exit codes:
0 Adapter file passes all checks
1 One or more checks failed (empty file, no reference to AGENTS.md,
excessive duplication, or file too long)
2 Usage or input error — a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown
option, a path that is not a file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing
was graded, so there is no FAIL line and no adapter edit to make: fix
the invocation or the file's encoding and re-run. Kept distinct from 1
because the skill's own closeout tells the agent to fix every non-zero
exit by editing the provider file, which for a mistyped flag edits the
wrong file forever.
3 A named input file exists but could not be read (permissions, a
directory swapped in mid-run, I/O error). Also not a FAIL: nothing was
graded and the adapter's contents are unknown, so editing it is
guesswork. Fix the file's readability and re-run.
2 Usage or input error — a bad or missing argument, a path that is not a
file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing was graded, so there is no
FAIL line and no adapter edit to make: fix the invocation or the file's
encoding and re-run. Kept distinct from 1 because the skill's own
closeout tells the agent to fix every non-zero exit by editing the
provider file, which for a mistyped flag edits the wrong file forever.
EOF
}
NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX=0
MAX_LINES=60
ARGS=()
END_OF_OPTS=0
require_int() {
# $1 = the value to validate
if [[ ! "$1" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines expects a non-negative integer, got '$1'." >&2
exit 2
fi
}
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
if [[ $END_OF_OPTS -eq 1 ]]; then
ARGS+=("$1")
shift
continue
fi
case "$1" in
--)
END_OF_OPTS=1
shift
;;
--help|-h)
usage
exit 0
@@ -101,37 +54,17 @@ while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX=1
shift
;;
--no-import-syntax=*)
echo "Error: --no-import-syntax is a flag and takes no value (got '$1')." >&2
exit 2
;;
--max-lines)
if [[ $# -lt 2 ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines requires a value (a non-negative integer)." >&2
exit 2
fi
MAX_LINES="$2"
require_int "$MAX_LINES"
shift 2
;;
--max-lines=*)
MAX_LINES="${1#--max-lines=}"
if [[ -z "$MAX_LINES" ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines requires a value (a non-negative integer)." >&2
if [[ ! "$MAX_LINES" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines expects a non-negative integer, got '$MAX_LINES'." >&2
exit 2
fi
require_int "$MAX_LINES"
shift
;;
-*)
# Reported as an unknown option rather than falling through to the
# positional bucket, where it used to surface as "'--bogus' is not a
# file" — the right exit code attached to a diagnostic that sends the
# reader looking for a path they never typed.
echo "Error: unknown option '$1'." >&2
echo "" >&2
usage >&2
exit 2
shift 2
;;
*)
ARGS+=("$1")
@@ -147,13 +80,6 @@ if [[ ${#ARGS[@]} -lt 2 ]]; then
exit 2
fi
if [[ ${#ARGS[@]} -gt 2 ]]; then
echo "Error: expected exactly 2 positional arguments (adapter-file and agents-md-file), got ${#ARGS[@]}: ${ARGS[*]}." >&2
echo "" >&2
usage >&2
exit 2
fi
python3 -u - "${ARGS[0]}" "${ARGS[1]}" "$NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX" "$MAX_LINES" <<'PYTHON'
import sys
import os
@@ -163,80 +89,45 @@ adapter_path, agents_md_path, no_import_syntax, max_lines = sys.argv[1:5]
no_import_syntax = no_import_syntax == "1"
max_lines = int(max_lines)
EXIT_FAIL = 1
EXIT_USAGE = 2
EXIT_UNREADABLE = 3
if not os.path.isfile(adapter_path):
print(f"Error: '{adapter_path}' is not a file.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
sys.exit(2)
if not os.path.isfile(agents_md_path):
print(f"Error: '{agents_md_path}' is not a file.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
sys.exit(2)
def read_text(path):
r"""File contents as text, UTF-8, every BOM stripped.
r"""File contents as text, UTF-8, BOM stripped.
The BOM strip is not cosmetic. IMPORT_RE anchors on `^ {0,3}@`, and a BOM
is not whitespace in Python, so a CLAUDE.md saved by an editor that emits
one had its first line — the `@AGENTS.md` import, which is the whole
adapter — silently treated as prose. The check then said "no reference to
AGENTS.md" and told the author to add the line already sitting in front of
them. Same class of silent BOM miss recorded in scripts/skill-size-check.sh;
strip it at the reader so no later check has to know about it.
Every U+FEFF goes, not just one at offset 0. Stripping exactly the first
one left the mirror-image false FAIL for a doubled BOM (two concatenated
files, or a tool that re-adds one) and for a BOM mid-file at the head of
the import line. U+FEFF has no meaning as a character in a markdown
instruction file, so removing all of them cannot lose signal.
The BOM strip is not cosmetic. IMPORT_RE anchors on `^\s*@`, and a BOM is
not `\s` in Python, so a CLAUDE.md saved by an editor that emits one had
its first line — the `@AGENTS.md` import, which is the whole adapter —
silently treated as prose. The check then said "no reference to AGENTS.md"
told the author to add the line already sitting in front of them. Same
class of silent BOM miss recorded in scripts/skill-size-check.sh; strip it
at the reader so no later check has to know about it.
Decoding is strict, not errors="replace". Replacement mangles the file and
the checks then grade the mangling: a UTF-16 adapter whose first line is
`@AGENTS.md` decoded to interleaved NULs and failed as "no reference",
which is a true FAIL for a false reason and points the fix at the wrong
thing. But strict UTF-8 alone does not catch it — BOM-less UTF-16LE/BE and
UTF-32LE are *valid* UTF-8, because NUL is a legal code point, so they
decoded clean and produced exactly that false diagnosis anyway. The NUL
byte is the complete signal and is checked first: no plausible markdown
adapter contains one, and every UTF-16/32 encoding of ASCII is full of
them. A file this gate cannot read gets an encoding diagnostic and exit 2,
thing. A file this gate cannot read gets an encoding diagnostic and exit 2,
the same policy the ADR-0020 validators' read_text() uses.
A file that exists but cannot be read at all is neither a pass nor a FAIL —
nothing was graded — so it exits 3 rather than 1. Exit 1 sends the skill's
closeout into "fix the FAIL by editing the provider file", which for a file
it cannot open is an instruction to edit blind.
"""
try:
with open(path, "rb") as fh:
raw = fh.read()
except OSError as exc:
print(f"Error: '{path}' exists but could not be read ({exc.strerror}). "
"Nothing was checked — fix whatever is blocking the read "
"(permissions, ownership, the underlying device) and re-run; do "
"not edit the adapter on the strength of this.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_UNREADABLE)
if b"\x00" in raw:
print(f"Error: '{path}' is not valid UTF-8 — it contains NUL bytes, so "
"it is almost certainly UTF-16 or UTF-32 (with or without a BOM). "
"Re-save it as UTF-8; this check does not guess at other "
"encodings.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
try:
text = raw.decode("utf-8")
with open(path, encoding="utf-8") as fh:
text = fh.read()
except UnicodeDecodeError as exc:
print(f"Error: '{path}' is not valid UTF-8 ({exc.reason} at byte "
f"{exc.start}) — re-save it as UTF-8; this check does not guess "
"at other encodings.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
return text.replace("\ufeff", "")
sys.exit(2)
return text[1:] if text.startswith("\ufeff") else text
adapter_content = read_text(adapter_path)
agents_md_content = read_text(agents_md_path)
adapter_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(adapter_path))
has_fail = False
@@ -245,229 +136,34 @@ if not adapter_content.strip():
print(" Why: An empty adapter carries no reference to AGENTS.md and no provider-specific content.")
print(" Fix: Add at least an import (or text pointer) to AGENTS.md.")
print()
sys.exit(EXIT_FAIL)
sys.exit(1)
# --- Inert regions -----------------------------------------------------------
#
# A reference only counts where something would actually resolve it. Fenced
# code blocks, indented code blocks and HTML comments are shown to the reader
# (or hidden from them) as literal text; Claude Code resolves an @import in
# none of them. Without this, a ```-fenced `@AGENTS.md` — the exact
# copy-the-example-into-the-file mistake this gate exists to catch — exited 0
# with the adapter deferring to nothing.
#
# Indented code blocks are handled by IMPORT_RE's `^ {0,3}` instead of by the
# mask: four leading spaces is what opens an indented code block in CommonMark,
# so an import has to sit within three. The mask deliberately does not apply
# that rule to prose pointers, where four-space indentation is ordinary list
# continuation rather than code.
FENCE_RE = re.compile(r'^( {0,3})(`{3,}|~{3,})(.*)$')
COMMENT_RE = re.compile(r'<!--.*?(?:-->|\Z)', re.DOTALL)
def line_offsets(text):
"""[(char offset, line without its terminator)] over `text`."""
out = []
off = 0
for raw in text.splitlines(keepends=True):
out.append((off, raw.rstrip("\r\n")))
off += len(raw)
return out
def build_inert_mask(text, offsets):
"""Per-character flags: 1 where a reference would never be resolved."""
mask = bytearray(len(text))
fence = None # (fence char, opening run length)
for start, line in offsets:
m = FENCE_RE.match(line)
if fence is None:
if m:
fence = (m.group(2)[0], len(m.group(2)))
for i in range(start, start + len(line)):
mask[i] = 1
continue
for i in range(start, start + len(line)):
mask[i] = 1
if (m and m.group(2)[0] == fence[0]
and len(m.group(2)) >= fence[1]
and not m.group(3).strip()):
fence = None
for m in COMMENT_RE.finditer(text):
if m.start() < len(mask) and mask[m.start()]:
continue # a literal "<!--" printed inside a fence opens nothing
for i in range(m.start(), min(m.end(), len(mask))):
mask[i] = 1
return mask
# --- Reference shapes --------------------------------------------------------
#
# `\S*AGENTS\.md` had no path-separator boundary, so `@NOTAGENTS.md` and
# `@zzzAGENTS.md` counted as imports of AGENTS.md. The matched path must end in
# AGENTS.md as a whole segment.
IMPORT_RE = re.compile(r'^ {0,3}@(?P<path>\S+?)\s*$')
# A mention in prose: an optional relative path, then AGENTS.md, with no
# identifier character glued to the front (so NOTAGENTS.md does not match) and
# nothing glued to the back.
MENTION_RE = re.compile(r'(?<![0-9A-Za-z_.\-/])((?:[\w.\-~]+/)*AGENTS\.md)(?![0-9A-Za-z])')
# A pointer has to read as a pointer. `"AGENTS.md" in ln` passed
# "Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete." and "We deleted AGENTS.md last
# year." — both of which point the reader away from the file. Require a
# deference cue in the naming sentence, and reject a negated one.
DIRECTIVE_RE = re.compile(
r'\b(see|read|refer|refers|referring|consult|consults|follow|follows|'
r'defer|defers|deferring|described|documented|documents|covered|covers|'
r'found|listed|specified|defined|governed|per|use|uses|using|apply|obey|'
r'start|check|live|lives|contains|holds|carries|inherit|inherits|import|'
r'imports|conventions|instructions|guidelines|guidance|rules|standards|'
r'reference|setup)\b', re.I)
NEGATION_RE = re.compile(
r"(\bnot\b|n't\b|\bnever\b|\bno longer\b|\bdeleted\b|\bremoved\b|"
r"\bobsolete\b|\bdeprecated\b|\bignore\b|\bignores\b|\bignoring\b|"
r"\bdisregard\b|\bsuperseded\b|\bgone\b|\bunused\b|\bstale\b)", re.I)
SENTENCE_SPLIT_RE = re.compile(r'(?<=[.;:!?])\s+')
def sentence_around(line, index):
"""(sentence of `line` containing character `index`, its start offset)."""
bounds = [0]
for m in SENTENCE_SPLIT_RE.finditer(line):
bounds.append(m.end())
bounds.append(len(line) + 1)
for i in range(len(bounds) - 1):
if bounds[i] <= index < bounds[i + 1]:
return line[bounds[i]:bounds[i + 1]], bounds[i]
return line, 0
def reads_as_pointer(line, match):
"""Does the sentence naming AGENTS.md actually point the reader at it?
The matched path is blanked out before the cues are applied. It is a
filename, not prose, and leaving it in let its own characters vote: the
perfectly ordinary `docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md` tripped the negation
cue on the `not` path segment, so a pointer got rejected for the wrong
reason and the near-miss line then reported the wrong diagnosis.
"""
sentence, sentence_start = sentence_around(line, match.start())
rel_start = match.start() - sentence_start
rel_end = match.end() - sentence_start
probe = sentence[:rel_start] + " AGENTS.md " + sentence[rel_end:]
if NEGATION_RE.search(probe):
return False
return bool(DIRECTIVE_RE.search(probe))
def resolve(raw_path):
"""An import/pointer path resolved the way the provider would resolve it."""
p = os.path.expanduser(raw_path)
if not os.path.isabs(p):
p = os.path.join(adapter_dir, p)
return os.path.normpath(p)
def target_problem(raw_path):
"""None if `raw_path` names a real, non-empty file; else why not."""
resolved = resolve(raw_path)
if not os.path.isfile(resolved):
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which does not exist"
try:
if os.path.getsize(resolved) == 0:
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which is empty"
with open(resolved, "rb") as fh:
if not fh.read().strip():
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which is blank"
except OSError as exc:
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which cannot be read ({exc.strerror})"
return None
def names_agents_md(path):
return path == "AGENTS.md" or path.endswith("/AGENTS.md")
offsets = line_offsets(adapter_content)
lines = [line for _, line in offsets]
mask = build_inert_mask(adapter_content, offsets)
def is_inert(abs_index):
return abs_index < len(mask) and bool(mask[abs_index])
# Lines shaped like an @AGENTS.md import, whether or not the target resolves.
# Used to exclude them from the duplication denominator and from the prose
# pointer scan, both of which only care about the shape.
import_shaped_lines = set()
# (line, raw path) for every import whose target actually resolves.
live_imports = []
# Diagnostics for imports that are the right shape but resolve to nothing.
dead_imports = []
# Imports that exist only inside a fence or an HTML comment.
inert_imports = []
for start, line in offsets:
m = IMPORT_RE.match(line)
if not m or not names_agents_md(m.group("path")):
continue
at_index = start + line.index("@")
if is_inert(at_index):
inert_imports.append(line.strip())
continue
import_shaped_lines.add(line)
problem = target_problem(m.group("path"))
if problem:
dead_imports.append(problem)
else:
live_imports.append(line)
live_pointers = []
dead_pointers = []
inert_pointers = []
mention_only = []
for start, line in offsets:
if line in import_shaped_lines:
continue
for m in MENTION_RE.finditer(line):
if is_inert(start + m.start()):
inert_pointers.append(line.strip())
continue
if not reads_as_pointer(line, m):
mention_only.append(sentence_around(line, m.start())[0].strip())
continue
problem = target_problem(m.group(1))
if problem:
dead_pointers.append(problem)
else:
live_pointers.append(line)
IMPORT_RE = re.compile(r'(?m)^\s*@\S*AGENTS\.md\s*$')
lines = adapter_content.splitlines()
import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if IMPORT_RE.match(ln)]
# A prose pointer is any line naming AGENTS.md that is not itself an import
# line — an inert `@AGENTS.md` in a provider that resolves no imports points
# a reader at nothing.
pointer_lines = [ln for ln in lines if not IMPORT_RE.match(ln) and "AGENTS.md" in ln]
if no_import_syntax:
has_reference = bool(live_pointers)
near_misses = dead_pointers + [f"{d} (inside a code fence or HTML comment)" for d in inert_pointers]
near_misses += [f"'{s}' names AGENTS.md but does not point at it" for s in mention_only]
has_reference = bool(pointer_lines)
else:
has_reference = bool(live_imports)
near_misses = dead_imports + [f"'{d}' is inside a code fence or HTML comment, where no import is resolved" for d in inert_imports]
has_reference = bool(import_lines)
if not has_reference:
has_fail = True
print(f"FAIL Adapter has no reference to AGENTS.md — {adapter_path}")
if no_import_syntax:
print(" Why: This provider resolves no cross-file import, so the adapter must point at AGENTS.md in prose; an `@AGENTS.md` line here is inert text. The pointer has to read as a pointer and name a file that is really there — a bare or negated mention (\"we deleted AGENTS.md\") defers nothing, and neither does a mention buried in a code fence or an HTML comment.")
print(" Fix: Add a sentence like \"See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.\", outside any fence, naming a path that exists relative to this file.")
print(" Why: This provider resolves no cross-file import, so the adapter must point at AGENTS.md in prose; an `@AGENTS.md` line here is inert text.")
print(" Fix: Add a sentence like \"See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.\"")
else:
print(" Why: A thin adapter must import AGENTS.md with an `@AGENTS.md` line of its own, indented no more than three spaces, and the path must resolve to a real non-empty file. Naming the file mid-sentence or inside backticks is prose this check will not credit; putting the line inside a ``` fence, an indented code block, or an HTML comment is worse, because nothing resolves it and it looks right.")
print(" Fix: Put `@AGENTS.md` (or the equivalent relative path) alone on its own line at the top level of the file, or pass --no-import-syntax if this provider resolves no imports.")
for miss in near_misses:
print(f" Near miss: {miss}")
print(" Why: A thin adapter must import AGENTS.md with an `@AGENTS.md` line of its own; naming the file mid-sentence or inside backticks is prose this check will not credit, and merely naming it defers nothing.")
print(" Fix: Put `@AGENTS.md` (or the equivalent relative path) alone on its own line, or pass --no-import-syntax if this provider resolves no imports.")
print()
# --- Duplication check ---
non_import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if ln not in import_shaped_lines]
non_import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if not IMPORT_RE.match(ln)]
adapter_lines = [ln.strip() for ln in non_import_lines if ln.strip()]
agents_lines = {ln.strip() for ln in agents_md_content.splitlines() if ln.strip()}
@@ -491,6 +187,6 @@ if non_blank_count > max_lines:
print()
if has_fail:
sys.exit(EXIT_FAIL)
sys.exit(1)
sys.exit(0)
PYTHON
@@ -212,308 +212,3 @@ EOF
assert_output --partial "no reference"
assert_output --partial "line of its own"
}
# --- Q1: a reference only counts where something would resolve it -------------
@test "an @AGENTS.md inside a backtick code fence is not credited as an import" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
# Claude notes
Put this at the top of the file:
```
@AGENTS.md
```
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "an @AGENTS.md inside a tilde code fence is not credited as an import" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
~~~
@AGENTS.md
~~~
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "an @AGENTS.md in a four-space indented code block is not credited as an import" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
# Claude notes
@AGENTS.md
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "an @AGENTS.md inside a multi-line HTML comment is not credited as an import" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
# Claude notes
<!--
@AGENTS.md
-->
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "an @AGENTS.md indented up to three spaces is still credited" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
printf ' @AGENTS.md\n' > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_success
}
# --- Q2: encodings that decode as valid UTF-8 but are not UTF-8 ---------------
@test "a BOM-less UTF-16LE adapter is an encoding error, not a missing reference" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write('@AGENTS.md\n'.encode('utf-16-le'))" "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 2
assert_output --partial "not valid UTF-8"
refute_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "a BOM-less UTF-32LE adapter is an encoding error, not a missing reference" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write('@AGENTS.md\n'.encode('utf-32-le'))" "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 2
assert_output --partial "not valid UTF-8"
refute_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "a doubled UTF-8 BOM does not hide the @import line" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write(('@AGENTS.md\n').encode('utf-8'))" "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_success
}
@test "a BOM in front of a mid-file @import line does not hide it" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write(('# Claude notes\n\n@AGENTS.md\n').encode('utf-8'))" "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_success
}
# --- Q3: a file that exists but cannot be read is not a FAIL -----------------
@test "an adapter that exists but cannot be read exits 3 with a diagnostic and no FAIL" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
chmod 000 "$ADAPTER"
# chmod is not enough under a uid that bypasses it (root in CI containers).
# /proc/self/mem is a regular file whose read returns EIO for every uid, so
# it exercises the same branch where chmod cannot.
if cat "$ADAPTER" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
if [ -e /proc/self/mem ]; then
ADAPTER=/proc/self/mem
else
chmod 644 "$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
skip "no way to make a readable-by-stat, unreadable-by-open file here"
fi
fi
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
chmod 644 "$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
assert_failure 3
assert_output --partial "could not be read"
refute_output --partial "FAIL"
}
# --- Q4: the reference has to name, and resolve to, a real AGENTS.md ---------
@test "an @import naming a path that does not exist is not credited" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
assert_output --partial "does not exist"
}
@test "@NOTAGENTS.md and @zzzAGENTS.md are not imports of AGENTS.md" {
# The decoys are real files, so the on-disk resolution check cannot be what
# rejects them. Only the path-segment boundary can — without the fixtures
# this test passes against a substring match and proves nothing.
cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/NOTAGENTS.md"
cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/zzzAGENTS.md"
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@NOTAGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
echo "@zzzAGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "an @import resolving to a zero-byte AGENTS.md is not credited" {
SUB="$TMPDIR/empty"
mkdir -p "$SUB"
: > "$SUB/AGENTS.md"
ADAPTER="$SUB/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
assert_output --partial "empty"
}
@test "an @import naming a real relative path to AGENTS.md is credited" {
mkdir -p "$TMPDIR/docs"
cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/docs/AGENTS.md"
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@docs/AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_success
}
# --- Q5: --no-import-syntax needs a pointer, not a mention -------------------
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a negated mention of AGENTS.md is not a pointer" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete.
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a past-tense mention of a deleted AGENTS.md is not a pointer" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
We deleted AGENTS.md last year.
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a pointer inside a code fence is not credited" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
Example of what to write:
```
See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.
```
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a pointer inside an HTML comment is not credited" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
# Copilot instructions
<!-- See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions. -->
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a name merely ending in AGENTS.md is not a pointer to it" {
# Real decoy files, so the on-disk resolution check cannot be what rejects
# these — only the token boundary in the mention pattern can. zzzAGENTS.md
# is the load-bearing case: dropping the boundary from NOTAGENTS.md leaves
# the fragment "NOT" behind, which the negation cue then rejects for an
# unrelated reason, so that case alone would prove nothing.
cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/zzzAGENTS.md"
cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/NOTAGENTS.md"
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
See zzzAGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
See NOTAGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a pointer naming a path that does not exist is not credited" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
See docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md for shared conventions.
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
assert_output --partial "does not exist"
}
# --- argument handling -------------------------------------------------------
@test "a third positional argument is rejected instead of silently ignored" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/also-not-graded.md"
assert_failure 2
assert_output --partial "exactly 2 positional arguments"
# The usage text this prints mentions the word FAIL, so refute the shape of
# a real finding line rather than the bare word.
refute_output --partial "FAIL Adapter"
}
@test "an unknown option is reported as an unknown option, not as a missing file" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" --bogus "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 2
assert_output --partial "unknown option '--bogus'"
refute_output --partial "'--bogus' is not a file"
refute_output --partial "FAIL Adapter"
}
@test "--max-lines=N is accepted in the equals form" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
{
echo "@AGENTS.md"
for i in $(seq 1 10); do echo "Provider-specific line $i unrelated to AGENTS.md content."; done
} > "$ADAPTER"
run bash "$SCRIPT" --max-lines=5 "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "thin"
run bash "$SCRIPT" --max-lines=40 "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_success
}
@test "with --no-import-syntax, a bare mention with no deference cue is not a pointer" {
ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
# Copilot instructions
This repo also has an AGENTS.md.
Prefer inline suggestions over chat for one-line edits.
EOF
run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
assert_failure 1
assert_output --partial "no reference"
}
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "core",
"version": "1.1.2",
"version": "1.2.0",
"description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
"author": {
"name": "Defame1297",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "core",
"version": "1.1.2",
"version": "1.2.0",
"description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
"author": {
"name": "Defame1297",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: core
version: 1.1.2
version: 1.2.0
description: Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.
author:
name: Defame1297
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ Then confirm `AGENTS.md` exists at the repo root. If it does not, stop and tell
Read the provider file and `AGENTS.md` side by side. Separate the provider file's content into two buckets: lines that restate what `AGENTS.md` already owns (universal rules, conventions, project overview) versus lines that are genuinely provider-specific (tool syntax, IDE behavior, model-specific instructions). Rewrite the provider file:
- **Providers with import syntax** (Claude Code): replace the redundant bucket with an `@AGENTS.md` (or correct relative path) import on a line of its own, keep the provider-specific bucket below it. An import folded into a sentence is not the thin-adapter shape and `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` will not credit it — nor one inside a code fence, an indented block, or an HTML comment, nor one whose path does not resolve to a real, non-empty file on disk.
- **Providers without import syntax** (Cursor, Copilot, etc.): replace the redundant bucket with a short sentence pointing at `AGENTS.md` ("See AGENTS.md at the repo root for ..."), keep the provider-specific bucket. A bare or negated mention is not a pointer and will not be credited.
- **Providers with import syntax** (Claude Code): replace the redundant bucket with an `@AGENTS.md` (or correct relative path) import on a line of its own, keep the provider-specific bucket below it. An import folded into a sentence is not the thin-adapter shape and `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` will not credit it.
- **Providers without import syntax** (Cursor, Copilot, etc.): replace the redundant bucket with a short pointer sentence mentioning `AGENTS.md`, keep the provider-specific bucket.
The provider file is the only file this skill ever writes. Never create or edit `AGENTS.md` — not in this step, not in any step, whatever the payoff looks like.
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Run the bundled check before finishing — this is the skill's own closeout gate
bash scripts/validate-adapter.sh [--no-import-syntax] [--max-lines N] <adapter-file> <agents-md-file>
```
Fix any `FAIL` by editing the provider file, and re-run until it exits `0`. Exits `2` and `3` are not `FAIL`s and nothing was graded under either, so neither is a reason to touch the adapter: `2` means the invocation or the input is wrong (a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown option, or a file that is not UTF-8), and `3` means a named file exists but could not be read.
Fix any `FAIL` by editing the provider file, and re-run until it exits `0`. Exit `2` is not a `FAIL`: it means the invocation or the input is wrong — a bad or missing argument, or a file that is not UTF-8 — so fix that, not the adapter.
## Step 4 — Report
@@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ This skill is reached two ways: invoked directly by a user, and composed into by
once it has written or updated the repo's `AGENTS.md`. Behave identically either way — do not
assume a caller skill exists. Detect the provider file yourself, confirm `AGENTS.md` yourself, and
run the closeout validator yourself, rather than treating any step as already done by the caller or
as something the caller will do afterwards. No handshake exists to rely on, and no state is
passed in beyond the file paths.
as something the caller will do afterwards. There is no handshake to rely on and no state passed
in beyond the file paths.
@@ -4,25 +4,6 @@ Deterministic self-check this skill shells out to instead of relying on LLM judg
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `validate-adapter.sh` | Checks a rewritten provider file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) has a working reference to AGENTS.md, doesn't duplicate its content, and stays under a thin-file line threshold |
| `validate-adapter.sh` | Checks a rewritten provider file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) has a reference to AGENTS.md, doesn't duplicate its content, and stays under a thin-file line threshold |
Takes exactly `<adapter-file> <agents-md-file>`, with optional `--no-import-syntax` and `--max-lines N` flags (also accepted as `--max-lines=N`). A third positional argument or an unknown option is an error, not something quietly ignored.
## What counts as a reference to AGENTS.md
Both modes require the named path to be a real path segment ending in `AGENTS.md` — `AGENTS.md` or `…/AGENTS.md`, not `NOTAGENTS.md` — that resolves on disk, relative to the adapter file, to a non-empty file. An adapter deferring to a path that is not there defers to nothing, so the check has to touch the disk rather than pattern-match the line.
A reference only counts where something would actually resolve it. A line inside a fenced code block, an indented code block, or an HTML comment is not credited in either mode: Claude Code resolves an import in none of those, so a fenced `@AGENTS.md` is the silent-drop failure this gate exists to catch, not a pass.
Default mode wants a real import: `@AGENTS.md` alone on its own line, indented no more than three spaces. `--no-import-syntax` wants a prose pointer that reads as one — the sentence naming `AGENTS.md` must carry a deference cue (see, read, refer to, documented in, conventions, …) and must not be negated. `Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete.` and `We deleted AGENTS.md last year.` name the file while pointing the reader away from it, and neither is a pointer.
## Exit codes
The distinction matters because the skill's closeout tells the agent to fix any non-zero exit by editing the provider file. That is right for exactly one of these.
| Code | Meaning | What to do |
|------|---------|------------|
| `0` | Passes every check | Nothing |
| `1` | One or more `FAIL` findings printed to stdout — empty adapter, no working reference to AGENTS.md, excessive duplication, or not thin | Edit the provider file |
| `2` | Usage or input error: a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown option, a path that is not a file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing was graded, so there is no `FAIL` line | Fix the invocation or the file's encoding — do not edit the adapter |
| `3` | A named input file exists but could not be read (permissions, I/O error). Nothing was graded and the adapter's contents are unknown | Fix the file's readability — do not edit the adapter |
Takes `<adapter-file> <agents-md-file>`, with optional `--no-import-syntax` and `--max-lines N` flags. Prints `FAIL` findings to stdout and exits non-zero on any failure.
@@ -14,10 +14,6 @@ Arguments:
adapter-file Path to the provider-specific file to check.
agents-md-file Path to the AGENTS.md file it should defer to.
Exactly two positional arguments are accepted. Extra ones are rejected
rather than ignored: a third path silently graded nothing but the first
two, so a typo'd invocation passed against the wrong file.
Options:
--no-import-syntax The target provider has no native cross-file import
mechanism. Require a plain-text pointer line naming
@@ -30,69 +26,26 @@ Options:
it's considered no longer "thin". Must be a
non-negative integer. Default: 60.
--help, -h Show this help and exit 0.
-- End of options; every later argument is positional.
Both flags also accept the --flag=value form (--max-lines=40). An unknown
option is reported as an unknown option, not as a missing file.
What counts as a reference:
In both modes the named path must be a real path segment ending in
AGENTS.md ("AGENTS.md" or ".../AGENTS.md" — not NOTAGENTS.md), and it must
resolve on disk, relative to the adapter file, to a non-empty file. An
adapter deferring to a path that is not there defers to nothing.
A mention inside a fenced code block, an indented code block, or an HTML
comment is not credited in either mode. Nothing resolves those, so an
adapter whose only "import" is fenced silently defers to nothing.
With --no-import-syntax the pointer must read as a pointer: the sentence
naming AGENTS.md has to carry a deference cue (see, read, refer to,
documented in, conventions, ...) and must not be a negation ("do not read
AGENTS.md", "we deleted AGENTS.md"). A bare mention is not a pointer.
Exit codes:
0 Adapter file passes all checks
1 One or more checks failed (empty file, no reference to AGENTS.md,
excessive duplication, or file too long)
2 Usage or input error — a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown
option, a path that is not a file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing
was graded, so there is no FAIL line and no adapter edit to make: fix
the invocation or the file's encoding and re-run. Kept distinct from 1
because the skill's own closeout tells the agent to fix every non-zero
exit by editing the provider file, which for a mistyped flag edits the
wrong file forever.
3 A named input file exists but could not be read (permissions, a
directory swapped in mid-run, I/O error). Also not a FAIL: nothing was
graded and the adapter's contents are unknown, so editing it is
guesswork. Fix the file's readability and re-run.
2 Usage or input error — a bad or missing argument, a path that is not a
file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing was graded, so there is no
FAIL line and no adapter edit to make: fix the invocation or the file's
encoding and re-run. Kept distinct from 1 because the skill's own
closeout tells the agent to fix every non-zero exit by editing the
provider file, which for a mistyped flag edits the wrong file forever.
EOF
}
NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX=0
MAX_LINES=60
ARGS=()
END_OF_OPTS=0
require_int() {
# $1 = the value to validate
if [[ ! "$1" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines expects a non-negative integer, got '$1'." >&2
exit 2
fi
}
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
if [[ $END_OF_OPTS -eq 1 ]]; then
ARGS+=("$1")
shift
continue
fi
case "$1" in
--)
END_OF_OPTS=1
shift
;;
--help|-h)
usage
exit 0
@@ -101,37 +54,17 @@ while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX=1
shift
;;
--no-import-syntax=*)
echo "Error: --no-import-syntax is a flag and takes no value (got '$1')." >&2
exit 2
;;
--max-lines)
if [[ $# -lt 2 ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines requires a value (a non-negative integer)." >&2
exit 2
fi
MAX_LINES="$2"
require_int "$MAX_LINES"
shift 2
;;
--max-lines=*)
MAX_LINES="${1#--max-lines=}"
if [[ -z "$MAX_LINES" ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines requires a value (a non-negative integer)." >&2
if [[ ! "$MAX_LINES" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
echo "Error: --max-lines expects a non-negative integer, got '$MAX_LINES'." >&2
exit 2
fi
require_int "$MAX_LINES"
shift
;;
-*)
# Reported as an unknown option rather than falling through to the
# positional bucket, where it used to surface as "'--bogus' is not a
# file" — the right exit code attached to a diagnostic that sends the
# reader looking for a path they never typed.
echo "Error: unknown option '$1'." >&2
echo "" >&2
usage >&2
exit 2
shift 2
;;
*)
ARGS+=("$1")
@@ -147,13 +80,6 @@ if [[ ${#ARGS[@]} -lt 2 ]]; then
exit 2
fi
if [[ ${#ARGS[@]} -gt 2 ]]; then
echo "Error: expected exactly 2 positional arguments (adapter-file and agents-md-file), got ${#ARGS[@]}: ${ARGS[*]}." >&2
echo "" >&2
usage >&2
exit 2
fi
python3 -u - "${ARGS[0]}" "${ARGS[1]}" "$NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX" "$MAX_LINES" <<'PYTHON'
import sys
import os
@@ -163,80 +89,45 @@ adapter_path, agents_md_path, no_import_syntax, max_lines = sys.argv[1:5]
no_import_syntax = no_import_syntax == "1"
max_lines = int(max_lines)
EXIT_FAIL = 1
EXIT_USAGE = 2
EXIT_UNREADABLE = 3
if not os.path.isfile(adapter_path):
print(f"Error: '{adapter_path}' is not a file.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
sys.exit(2)
if not os.path.isfile(agents_md_path):
print(f"Error: '{agents_md_path}' is not a file.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
sys.exit(2)
def read_text(path):
r"""File contents as text, UTF-8, every BOM stripped.
r"""File contents as text, UTF-8, BOM stripped.
The BOM strip is not cosmetic. IMPORT_RE anchors on `^ {0,3}@`, and a BOM
is not whitespace in Python, so a CLAUDE.md saved by an editor that emits
one had its first line — the `@AGENTS.md` import, which is the whole
adapter — silently treated as prose. The check then said "no reference to
AGENTS.md" and told the author to add the line already sitting in front of
them. Same class of silent BOM miss recorded in scripts/skill-size-check.sh;
strip it at the reader so no later check has to know about it.
Every U+FEFF goes, not just one at offset 0. Stripping exactly the first
one left the mirror-image false FAIL for a doubled BOM (two concatenated
files, or a tool that re-adds one) and for a BOM mid-file at the head of
the import line. U+FEFF has no meaning as a character in a markdown
instruction file, so removing all of them cannot lose signal.
The BOM strip is not cosmetic. IMPORT_RE anchors on `^\s*@`, and a BOM is
not `\s` in Python, so a CLAUDE.md saved by an editor that emits one had
its first line — the `@AGENTS.md` import, which is the whole adapter —
silently treated as prose. The check then said "no reference to AGENTS.md"
told the author to add the line already sitting in front of them. Same
class of silent BOM miss recorded in scripts/skill-size-check.sh; strip it
at the reader so no later check has to know about it.
Decoding is strict, not errors="replace". Replacement mangles the file and
the checks then grade the mangling: a UTF-16 adapter whose first line is
`@AGENTS.md` decoded to interleaved NULs and failed as "no reference",
which is a true FAIL for a false reason and points the fix at the wrong
thing. But strict UTF-8 alone does not catch it — BOM-less UTF-16LE/BE and
UTF-32LE are *valid* UTF-8, because NUL is a legal code point, so they
decoded clean and produced exactly that false diagnosis anyway. The NUL
byte is the complete signal and is checked first: no plausible markdown
adapter contains one, and every UTF-16/32 encoding of ASCII is full of
them. A file this gate cannot read gets an encoding diagnostic and exit 2,
thing. A file this gate cannot read gets an encoding diagnostic and exit 2,
the same policy the ADR-0020 validators' read_text() uses.
A file that exists but cannot be read at all is neither a pass nor a FAIL —
nothing was graded — so it exits 3 rather than 1. Exit 1 sends the skill's
closeout into "fix the FAIL by editing the provider file", which for a file
it cannot open is an instruction to edit blind.
"""
try:
with open(path, "rb") as fh:
raw = fh.read()
except OSError as exc:
print(f"Error: '{path}' exists but could not be read ({exc.strerror}). "
"Nothing was checked — fix whatever is blocking the read "
"(permissions, ownership, the underlying device) and re-run; do "
"not edit the adapter on the strength of this.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_UNREADABLE)
if b"\x00" in raw:
print(f"Error: '{path}' is not valid UTF-8 — it contains NUL bytes, so "
"it is almost certainly UTF-16 or UTF-32 (with or without a BOM). "
"Re-save it as UTF-8; this check does not guess at other "
"encodings.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
try:
text = raw.decode("utf-8")
with open(path, encoding="utf-8") as fh:
text = fh.read()
except UnicodeDecodeError as exc:
print(f"Error: '{path}' is not valid UTF-8 ({exc.reason} at byte "
f"{exc.start}) — re-save it as UTF-8; this check does not guess "
"at other encodings.", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
return text.replace("\ufeff", "")
sys.exit(2)
return text[1:] if text.startswith("\ufeff") else text
adapter_content = read_text(adapter_path)
agents_md_content = read_text(agents_md_path)
adapter_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(adapter_path))
has_fail = False
@@ -245,229 +136,34 @@ if not adapter_content.strip():
print(" Why: An empty adapter carries no reference to AGENTS.md and no provider-specific content.")
print(" Fix: Add at least an import (or text pointer) to AGENTS.md.")
print()
sys.exit(EXIT_FAIL)
sys.exit(1)
# --- Inert regions -----------------------------------------------------------
#
# A reference only counts where something would actually resolve it. Fenced
# code blocks, indented code blocks and HTML comments are shown to the reader
# (or hidden from them) as literal text; Claude Code resolves an @import in
# none of them. Without this, a ```-fenced `@AGENTS.md` — the exact
# copy-the-example-into-the-file mistake this gate exists to catch — exited 0
# with the adapter deferring to nothing.
#
# Indented code blocks are handled by IMPORT_RE's `^ {0,3}` instead of by the
# mask: four leading spaces is what opens an indented code block in CommonMark,
# so an import has to sit within three. The mask deliberately does not apply
# that rule to prose pointers, where four-space indentation is ordinary list
# continuation rather than code.
FENCE_RE = re.compile(r'^( {0,3})(`{3,}|~{3,})(.*)$')
COMMENT_RE = re.compile(r'<!--.*?(?:-->|\Z)', re.DOTALL)
def line_offsets(text):
"""[(char offset, line without its terminator)] over `text`."""
out = []
off = 0
for raw in text.splitlines(keepends=True):
out.append((off, raw.rstrip("\r\n")))
off += len(raw)
return out
def build_inert_mask(text, offsets):
"""Per-character flags: 1 where a reference would never be resolved."""
mask = bytearray(len(text))
fence = None # (fence char, opening run length)
for start, line in offsets:
m = FENCE_RE.match(line)
if fence is None:
if m:
fence = (m.group(2)[0], len(m.group(2)))
for i in range(start, start + len(line)):
mask[i] = 1
continue
for i in range(start, start + len(line)):
mask[i] = 1
if (m and m.group(2)[0] == fence[0]
and len(m.group(2)) >= fence[1]
and not m.group(3).strip()):
fence = None
for m in COMMENT_RE.finditer(text):
if m.start() < len(mask) and mask[m.start()]:
continue # a literal "<!--" printed inside a fence opens nothing
for i in range(m.start(), min(m.end(), len(mask))):
mask[i] = 1
return mask
# --- Reference shapes --------------------------------------------------------
#
# `\S*AGENTS\.md` had no path-separator boundary, so `@NOTAGENTS.md` and
# `@zzzAGENTS.md` counted as imports of AGENTS.md. The matched path must end in
# AGENTS.md as a whole segment.
IMPORT_RE = re.compile(r'^ {0,3}@(?P<path>\S+?)\s*$')
# A mention in prose: an optional relative path, then AGENTS.md, with no
# identifier character glued to the front (so NOTAGENTS.md does not match) and
# nothing glued to the back.
MENTION_RE = re.compile(r'(?<![0-9A-Za-z_.\-/])((?:[\w.\-~]+/)*AGENTS\.md)(?![0-9A-Za-z])')
# A pointer has to read as a pointer. `"AGENTS.md" in ln` passed
# "Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete." and "We deleted AGENTS.md last
# year." — both of which point the reader away from the file. Require a
# deference cue in the naming sentence, and reject a negated one.
DIRECTIVE_RE = re.compile(
r'\b(see|read|refer|refers|referring|consult|consults|follow|follows|'
r'defer|defers|deferring|described|documented|documents|covered|covers|'
r'found|listed|specified|defined|governed|per|use|uses|using|apply|obey|'
r'start|check|live|lives|contains|holds|carries|inherit|inherits|import|'
r'imports|conventions|instructions|guidelines|guidance|rules|standards|'
r'reference|setup)\b', re.I)
NEGATION_RE = re.compile(
r"(\bnot\b|n't\b|\bnever\b|\bno longer\b|\bdeleted\b|\bremoved\b|"
r"\bobsolete\b|\bdeprecated\b|\bignore\b|\bignores\b|\bignoring\b|"
r"\bdisregard\b|\bsuperseded\b|\bgone\b|\bunused\b|\bstale\b)", re.I)
SENTENCE_SPLIT_RE = re.compile(r'(?<=[.;:!?])\s+')
def sentence_around(line, index):
"""(sentence of `line` containing character `index`, its start offset)."""
bounds = [0]
for m in SENTENCE_SPLIT_RE.finditer(line):
bounds.append(m.end())
bounds.append(len(line) + 1)
for i in range(len(bounds) - 1):
if bounds[i] <= index < bounds[i + 1]:
return line[bounds[i]:bounds[i + 1]], bounds[i]
return line, 0
def reads_as_pointer(line, match):
"""Does the sentence naming AGENTS.md actually point the reader at it?
The matched path is blanked out before the cues are applied. It is a
filename, not prose, and leaving it in let its own characters vote: the
perfectly ordinary `docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md` tripped the negation
cue on the `not` path segment, so a pointer got rejected for the wrong
reason and the near-miss line then reported the wrong diagnosis.
"""
sentence, sentence_start = sentence_around(line, match.start())
rel_start = match.start() - sentence_start
rel_end = match.end() - sentence_start
probe = sentence[:rel_start] + " AGENTS.md " + sentence[rel_end:]
if NEGATION_RE.search(probe):
return False
return bool(DIRECTIVE_RE.search(probe))
def resolve(raw_path):
"""An import/pointer path resolved the way the provider would resolve it."""
p = os.path.expanduser(raw_path)
if not os.path.isabs(p):
p = os.path.join(adapter_dir, p)
return os.path.normpath(p)
def target_problem(raw_path):
"""None if `raw_path` names a real, non-empty file; else why not."""
resolved = resolve(raw_path)
if not os.path.isfile(resolved):
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which does not exist"
try:
if os.path.getsize(resolved) == 0:
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which is empty"
with open(resolved, "rb") as fh:
if not fh.read().strip():
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which is blank"
except OSError as exc:
return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which cannot be read ({exc.strerror})"
return None
def names_agents_md(path):
return path == "AGENTS.md" or path.endswith("/AGENTS.md")
offsets = line_offsets(adapter_content)
lines = [line for _, line in offsets]
mask = build_inert_mask(adapter_content, offsets)
def is_inert(abs_index):
return abs_index < len(mask) and bool(mask[abs_index])
# Lines shaped like an @AGENTS.md import, whether or not the target resolves.
# Used to exclude them from the duplication denominator and from the prose
# pointer scan, both of which only care about the shape.
import_shaped_lines = set()
# (line, raw path) for every import whose target actually resolves.
live_imports = []
# Diagnostics for imports that are the right shape but resolve to nothing.
dead_imports = []
# Imports that exist only inside a fence or an HTML comment.
inert_imports = []
for start, line in offsets:
m = IMPORT_RE.match(line)
if not m or not names_agents_md(m.group("path")):
continue
at_index = start + line.index("@")
if is_inert(at_index):
inert_imports.append(line.strip())
continue
import_shaped_lines.add(line)
problem = target_problem(m.group("path"))
if problem:
dead_imports.append(problem)
else:
live_imports.append(line)
live_pointers = []
dead_pointers = []
inert_pointers = []
mention_only = []
for start, line in offsets:
if line in import_shaped_lines:
continue
for m in MENTION_RE.finditer(line):
if is_inert(start + m.start()):
inert_pointers.append(line.strip())
continue
if not reads_as_pointer(line, m):
mention_only.append(sentence_around(line, m.start())[0].strip())
continue
problem = target_problem(m.group(1))
if problem:
dead_pointers.append(problem)
else:
live_pointers.append(line)
IMPORT_RE = re.compile(r'(?m)^\s*@\S*AGENTS\.md\s*$')
lines = adapter_content.splitlines()
import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if IMPORT_RE.match(ln)]
# A prose pointer is any line naming AGENTS.md that is not itself an import
# line — an inert `@AGENTS.md` in a provider that resolves no imports points
# a reader at nothing.
pointer_lines = [ln for ln in lines if not IMPORT_RE.match(ln) and "AGENTS.md" in ln]
if no_import_syntax:
has_reference = bool(live_pointers)
near_misses = dead_pointers + [f"{d} (inside a code fence or HTML comment)" for d in inert_pointers]
near_misses += [f"'{s}' names AGENTS.md but does not point at it" for s in mention_only]
has_reference = bool(pointer_lines)
else:
has_reference = bool(live_imports)
near_misses = dead_imports + [f"'{d}' is inside a code fence or HTML comment, where no import is resolved" for d in inert_imports]
has_reference = bool(import_lines)
if not has_reference:
has_fail = True
print(f"FAIL Adapter has no reference to AGENTS.md — {adapter_path}")
if no_import_syntax:
print(" Why: This provider resolves no cross-file import, so the adapter must point at AGENTS.md in prose; an `@AGENTS.md` line here is inert text. The pointer has to read as a pointer and name a file that is really there — a bare or negated mention (\"we deleted AGENTS.md\") defers nothing, and neither does a mention buried in a code fence or an HTML comment.")
print(" Fix: Add a sentence like \"See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.\", outside any fence, naming a path that exists relative to this file.")
print(" Why: This provider resolves no cross-file import, so the adapter must point at AGENTS.md in prose; an `@AGENTS.md` line here is inert text.")
print(" Fix: Add a sentence like \"See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.\"")
else:
print(" Why: A thin adapter must import AGENTS.md with an `@AGENTS.md` line of its own, indented no more than three spaces, and the path must resolve to a real non-empty file. Naming the file mid-sentence or inside backticks is prose this check will not credit; putting the line inside a ``` fence, an indented code block, or an HTML comment is worse, because nothing resolves it and it looks right.")
print(" Fix: Put `@AGENTS.md` (or the equivalent relative path) alone on its own line at the top level of the file, or pass --no-import-syntax if this provider resolves no imports.")
for miss in near_misses:
print(f" Near miss: {miss}")
print(" Why: A thin adapter must import AGENTS.md with an `@AGENTS.md` line of its own; naming the file mid-sentence or inside backticks is prose this check will not credit, and merely naming it defers nothing.")
print(" Fix: Put `@AGENTS.md` (or the equivalent relative path) alone on its own line, or pass --no-import-syntax if this provider resolves no imports.")
print()
# --- Duplication check ---
non_import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if ln not in import_shaped_lines]
non_import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if not IMPORT_RE.match(ln)]
adapter_lines = [ln.strip() for ln in non_import_lines if ln.strip()]
agents_lines = {ln.strip() for ln in agents_md_content.splitlines() if ln.strip()}
@@ -491,6 +187,6 @@ if non_blank_count > max_lines:
print()
if has_fail:
sys.exit(EXIT_FAIL)
sys.exit(1)
sys.exit(0)
PYTHON
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ You are the orchestrator for the git plugin—a composable workflow dispatcher d
You act on the caller's real branch and session context (you explicitly carry forward `current_branch`), not a disposable copy — you do not run in an isolated worktree.
**Scope:** this orchestrator routes git-object operations only (commits, branches, worktrees, remotes, submodules, history). `pc-author` and `pc-run` (pre-commit config authoring and hook execution) are intentionally not routed here — they operate on `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and hook installation, not git objects. `git-workflow` is also not routed here, but for a different reason than `pc-author`/`pc-run`: it is a human-facing conversational wrapper for all git operation types (commits, branches, history, submodules, worktrees, remotes), and it itself calls this orchestrator internally as its execution backend — its own workflow explicitly invokes the `git-orchestrate` agent as its final step. It is not a peer to invoke instead of this dispatcher, and its own boundary clause sends agent callers here ("Not an agent caller -> `git-orchestrate`"). Agent callers route git-object operations here directly; direct human users to `git-workflow` when they want guided, conversational git help — it will call back into this orchestrator itself. Invoke `pc-author`/`pc-run` directly rather than through this dispatcher; do not invoke `git-workflow` as an agent caller under any circumstance.
**Scope:** this orchestrator routes git-object operations only (commits, branches, worktrees, remotes, submodules, history). `pc-author` and `pc-run` (pre-commit config authoring and hook execution) are intentionally not routed here — they operate on `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and hook installation, not git objects. `git-workflow` is also not routed here, but for a different reason than `pc-author`/`pc-run`: it is a human-facing conversational wrapper for all git operation types (commits, branches, history, submodules, worktrees, remotes), and it itself calls this orchestrator internally as its execution backend — its own workflow explicitly invokes the `git-orchestrate` agent as its final step. It is not a peer to invoke instead of this dispatcher, and it explicitly refuses agent callers ("Do not use when the caller is an agent"). Agent callers route git-object operations here directly; direct human users to `git-workflow` when they want guided, conversational git help — it will call back into this orchestrator itself. Invoke `pc-author`/`pc-run` directly rather than through this dispatcher; do not invoke `git-workflow` as an agent caller under any circumstance.
## Hard rules
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Describe your branch task: create a feature/hotfix/release branch, switch, delet
|------|---------|
| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
| `references/branch-patterns.md` | Loaded when a branch's base, name prefix, or merge rule depends on GitHub Flow vs. Gitflow |
| `references/branch-operations.md` | Loaded when running a create/switch/delete/rename/track/list/stash action, or resolving `get-intent` |
| `references/branch-operations.md` | Loaded when running a create/switch/delete/rename/track/list action, or resolving `get-intent` |
| `references/merging.md` | Loaded when merging one branch into another or resolving merge conflicts |
| `references/comparing-branches.md` | Loaded when comparing two branches or finding where they diverged |
| `references/orchestrator-contract.md` | Loaded when `git-orchestrate` or another calling agent supplies a structured request rather than prose |
@@ -29,6 +29,5 @@ Describe your branch task: create a feature/hotfix/release branch, switch, delet
## Composition
`git-orchestrate` calls this skill for the branch step of a multi-step workflow and parses its
structured result. Revert is `git-history`'s; commit authoring, rebase, reset and cherry-pick are
`git-commits`'; deleting a remote branch is `git-remotes`'; branch operations against a
Gitea-hosted remote are `gitea-branches`'.
structured result. Cherry-pick and revert are `git-history`'s; commit authoring and rebase are
`git-commits`'; branch operations against a Gitea-hosted remote are `gitea-branches`'.
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ description: >
Not a Gitea remote's branches -> `gitea-branches`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.1"
category: git
source_keys:
- context7-git-htmldocs
@@ -21,7 +20,7 @@ metadata:
## Gotchas
- **Uncommitted changes abort a switch.** `git switch` refuses rather than clobbering conflicting local edits. Offer to stash and retry — forcing the checkout past it is how work disappears.
- **A branch and a tag can carry the same name.** Detect it before acting — `git branch --list <name>` (bare, not `rtk`: rtk prints a phantom `* ` line even on no match, which reports every name as ambiguous — ADR-0023) and `rtk git tag --list <name>`; output from both means the name is ambiguous. Prefer `git switch` over `git checkout`, and where a command accepts either ref, disambiguate with `refs/heads/<name>` or `refs/tags/<name>`.
- **A branch and a tag can carry the same name.** Detect it before acting — `git branch --list <name>` and `git tag --list <name>`; output from both means the name is ambiguous. Prefer `git switch` over `git checkout`, and where a command accepts either ref, disambiguate with `refs/heads/<name>` or `refs/tags/<name>`.
- **`main` and `master` are a refusal, not a gate.** Force-pushing, force-deleting, or renaming them is rejected even when the caller passes `confirm: true` — no flag makes the remote's history recoverable. Offer a new branch instead.
## Step 1 — Determine the branching pattern
@@ -34,7 +33,7 @@ The two patterns are not mixable, and the wrong merge rule silently damages hist
| Action | Reference |
|---|---|
| create, switch, delete, rename, track, list, get-intent, stash | `references/branch-operations.md` |
| create, switch, delete, rename, track, list, get-intent | `references/branch-operations.md` |
| merge a branch, resolve merge conflicts | `references/merging.md` |
| compare two branches, find their divergence | `references/comparing-branches.md` |
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ These gates are passable. The `main`/`master` refusal in Gotchas is not.
## Step 4 — Set tracking
A new branch's first push must be `rtk git push -u origin <branch>`. The push itself is `git-remotes`' — every remote-side gate lives there, which is why Step 2's remote-delete row hands off the same way — but the upstream requirement originates here, so carry it in the handoff. Without an upstream, later pushes and pulls either fail or silently target the wrong remote branch, and the caller has no way to tell which happened.
When pushing a branch for the first time, always `git push -u origin <branch>`. Without an upstream, later pushes and pulls either fail or silently target the wrong remote branch, and the caller has no way to tell which happened.
## Step 5 — Return a structured result
@@ -8,21 +8,19 @@ source_keys:
One command per action. Where two forms exist, the first is the default and the second the escape
hatch.
- **create** — `rtk git switch -c <branch> <base>`. Base comes from the config's `base_branch`
- **create** — `git switch -c <branch> <base>`. Base comes from the config's `base_branch`
(`main` under GitHub Flow, usually `develop` under Gitflow).
- **switch** — `rtk git switch <branch>` moves to an existing local branch; it aborts rather than
clobbering conflicting local changes. `rtk git switch -` returns to the previous branch.
- **delete (local)** — `rtk git branch -d <branch>` refuses when the branch holds unmerged commits,
which is why it is the default. `rtk git branch -D <branch>` forces the deletion and discards that
- **switch** — `git switch <branch>` moves to an existing local branch; it aborts rather than
clobbering conflicting local changes. `git switch -` returns to the previous branch.
- **delete (local)** — `git branch -d <branch>` refuses when the branch holds unmerged commits,
which is why it is the default. `git branch -D <branch>` forces the deletion and discards that
work — only after the destructive-operation gates pass and `confirm: true` is set.
- **delete (remote)** — not this skill's. Deleting a remote branch is a push, and every remote-side
gate lives in `git-remotes`; hand it there rather than running the push from here. Its
`references/push.md` carries the command and the refspec form.
- **rename** — `rtk git branch -m <old> <new>`.
- **list** — `rtk git branch` (local), `-a` (local plus remote-tracking), `-r` (remote-tracking only),
- **delete (remote)** — `git push origin --delete <branch>`.
- **rename** — `git branch -m <old> <new>`.
- **list** — `git branch` (local), `-a` (local plus remote-tracking), `-r` (remote-tracking only),
`--merged` / `--no-merged` (filter by merge status into the current branch).
- **track** — `rtk git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/<branch>` sets an upstream without pushing.
`rtk git branch -vv` shows the tracking state of every local branch.
- **track** — `git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/<branch>` sets an upstream without pushing.
`git branch -vv` shows the tracking state of every local branch.
## get-intent
@@ -34,26 +32,3 @@ On `get-intent`, either parse the intent back out of the branch-name convention
(`feature/<intent-slug>`) or return `{ "intent": null }` when the caller never persisted the
create-time value. Never fabricate an intent: a downstream commit message built on a guessed
intent is worse than one built on none.
## Stashing work in progress
A switch aborts rather than clobbering conflicting local changes (see Gotchas). Stash is the way
past it: it shelves the working tree and index so the branch pointer can move.
- **save** — `rtk git stash push -m "<message>"`. Add `-u` to include untracked files; verified on Git
2.39.5, a plain `push` leaves them in place, and a plain `push` with *only* untracked changes
reports `No local changes to save` and stashes nothing. Bare `git stash` is `push` with no message.
- **restore** — `git stash pop` applies the newest entry and deletes it. Bare, not `rtk`: on a
conflict rtk prints only `FAILED: git stash pop` and swallows the conflict report the paragraph
below tells you to read (ADR-0023). `rtk git stash apply stash@{n}`
applies without deleting, for replaying one shelf onto more than one branch.
- **list** — `git stash list` — bare, not `rtk`: rtk prints `No stashes` where git prints nothing,
so an empty-output test misfires (ADR-0023). `rtk git stash show -p stash@{n}` prints that entry's diff.
- **drop** — `rtk git stash drop stash@{n}` deletes one entry. `rtk git stash clear` deletes all of them
and nothing recovers them — confirm before running it.
- **branch from a stash** — `rtk git stash branch <branch> stash@{n}` creates a branch at the commit the
stash was taken from and pops it there. Use it when the stash no longer applies to the current tip.
**A conflicting `pop` keeps the entry.** Verified on 2.39.5: it exits 1, writes conflict markers,
prints "The stash entry is kept in case you need it again", and `git stash list` still shows it.
Resolve, `rtk git add`, then `rtk git stash drop` the entry by hand — otherwise it silently accumulates.
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ source_keys:
The two-dot and three-dot forms mean different things and are easy to swap by accident — check the
direction before reporting a result.
- `rtk git log main..feature` — commits on `feature` that are not on `main`.
- `rtk git log feature..main` — the reverse direction: commits on `main` not on `feature`.
- `rtk git log --left-right main...feature` — both diverging sets at once (symmetric difference).
- `rtk git diff main...feature` — the diff from the common ancestor to `feature`'s tip, which is what
- `git log main..feature` — commits on `feature` that are not on `main`.
- `git log feature..main` — the reverse direction: commits on `main` not on `feature`.
- `git log --left-right main...feature` — both diverging sets at once (symmetric difference).
- `git diff main...feature` — the diff from the common ancestor to `feature`'s tip, which is what
a reviewer sees, rather than the diff between the two tips.
- `rtk git merge-base main feature` — print the common ancestor commit.
- `git merge-base main feature` — print the common ancestor commit.
@@ -6,26 +6,25 @@ source_keys:
# Merging one branch into another
Scope is fast-forward and merge-commit mechanics plus conflict resolution. Rebase and cherry-pick
belong to `git-commits`; revert to `git-history`.
Scope is fast-forward and merge-commit mechanics plus conflict resolution. Rebase belongs to
`git-commits`; cherry-pick and revert to `git-history`.
- **Fast-forward** — `rtk git merge <branch>` advances the pointer with no merge commit when the
- **Fast-forward** — `git merge <branch>` advances the pointer with no merge commit when the
target has not diverged.
- **True merge** — `rtk git merge --no-ff <branch>` forces a merge commit even when a fast-forward is
- **True merge** — `git merge --no-ff <branch>` forces a merge commit even when a fast-forward is
possible. Gitflow requires it on every supporting-branch merge.
- **Squash merge** — `rtk git merge --squash <branch>` stages the combined diff without committing.
Follow it with a `rtk git commit`.
- **Octopus merge** — `rtk git merge branch-a branch-b branch-c` merges more than two branches at
- **Squash merge** — `git merge --squash <branch>` stages the combined diff without committing.
Follow it with a `git commit`.
- **Octopus merge** — `git merge branch-a branch-b branch-c` merges more than two branches at
once, but fails outright on any conflict. Use sequential two-way merges when conflicts are
likely.
## Conflict resolution
When Git cannot auto-merge it writes conflict markers and stops mid-merge. Run `rtk git status` to
list the conflicted files, edit each to resolve its markers, then `rtk git add <file>` and
`rtk git merge --continue`.
When Git cannot auto-merge it writes conflict markers and stops mid-merge. Run `git status` to
list the conflicted files, edit each to resolve its markers, then `git add <file>` and
`git merge --continue`.
- `rtk git merge --abort` restores the pre-merge state.
- `git mergetool` opens the configured merge tool — bare, not `rtk`: it hands control to an
interactive child process, and a token filter has nothing to offer there (ADR-0023).
- `rtk git diff --diff-filter=U` shows only the still-conflicted files.
- `git merge --abort` restores the pre-merge state.
- `git mergetool` opens the configured merge tool.
- `git diff --diff-filter=U` shows only the still-conflicted files.
+6 -9
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ description: >
Not branch lifecycle -> `git-branches`.
metadata:
version: "0.1.4"
category: git
source_keys:
- conventional-commits-spec
@@ -21,9 +20,8 @@ allowed-tools: Bash
## Gotchas
- **Run git as `rtk git <subcommand>`, never bare `git`** — org convention, in `&&` chains too. Exceptions: ADR-0023 clause 3.
- **Run git as `rtk git <subcommand>`, never bare `git`** — org convention, in `&&` chains too.
- **Refuse to force-push `main`/`master`** — a rewrite leaves the branch diverged and the reflex is to force it back; safe only where nobody else has based work on it.
- **`reset --hard` is a confirmation gate, not a default.** It overwrites the working tree, and uncommitted edits it discards were never in git, so no reflog recovers them. Name what will be lost and offer a stash first.
- **Never add `--no-verify`** — using it when a hook fails bypasses the QA gate the pipeline depends on. Only on the user's explicit demand, with a warning.
## Dispatch
@@ -33,19 +31,18 @@ Read exactly one flow file. Each is self-contained.
| Condition | Flow | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Composing a new commit from staged changes | create | `references/create-commit.md` |
| Amending, squashing, folding a fixup, rebasing onto a new base, or resetting HEAD | rewrite | `references/rewrite-history.md` |
| Amending, squashing, or folding a fixup into an earlier commit | rewrite | `references/rewrite-history.md` |
| Replaying an existing commit onto the current branch | cherry-pick | `references/cherry-pick.md` |
## Gates on every flow
1. **Confirmation.** No history rewrite executes without explicit approval from the user or the calling agent. Cherry-pick needs the destination branch confirmed first.
2. **Atomicity.** The result must be one logical, independently reviewable and reversible change that leaves the repository buildable and testable. This binds an amend or a squashed result as much as a fresh commit — say so before writing it, not after.
3. **Secrets.** Before any commit or amend, scan the staged diff for anything resembling an API key,
2. **Secrets.** Before any commit or amend, scan the staged diff for anything resembling an API key,
token, password, connection string, or environment-specific config. Stop and flag it rather than
committing it.
4. **Validation.** Check the message against commitlint `config-conventional` before committing. If a type, footer, or breaking-change edge case is not obvious, read `references/conventional-commits-spec.md` — it carries the constraint table, the 11-type set, and the footer token rules.
5. **SemVer impact.** Report the bump the commit implies: `feat` → MINOR, `fix`/`perf`/`revert` → PATCH, any breaking change → MAJOR, everything else → none. Callers decide releases from this, so never omit it.
6. **Conflicts.** If a rebase or cherry-pick halts, offer resolution or an abort. Do not resolve automatically without confirmation.
3. **Validation.** Check the message against commitlint `config-conventional` before committing. If a type, footer, or breaking-change edge case is not obvious, read `references/conventional-commits-spec.md` — it carries the constraint table, the 11-type set, and the footer token rules.
4. **SemVer impact.** Report the bump the commit implies: `feat` → MINOR, `fix`/`perf`/`revert` → PATCH, any breaking change → MAJOR, everything else → none. Callers decide releases from this, so never omit it.
5. **Conflicts.** If a rebase or cherry-pick halts, offer resolution or an abort. Do not resolve automatically without confirmation.
## Output
@@ -21,9 +21,7 @@ Prefer this whenever a commit is written to be folded, because git does the mark
1. `rtk git commit --fixup=<commit>` keeps the target's message; `rtk git commit --squash=<commit>` lets you edit the combined message later. Both prefix the message with `fixup!`/`squash!` and name the target commit.
2. Get explicit approval — the rebase still rewrites history.
3. Run `git rebase -i --autosquash HEAD~N` — bare, not `rtk`: `-i` opens an interactive sequence editor (ADR-0023). Git pre-fills the todo list with the tagged commits already reordered against their targets; save it unchanged to apply.
**`-i` is not optional here.** On Git 2.39.5, `git rebase --autosquash HEAD~N` without `-i` prints `Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/<branch>.` and exits 0 while leaving the `fixup!` commit in place at its original SHA — `--autosquash` is honoured only by the interactive machinery, and the false success is the trap: the fold is reported as done, and the surviving `fixup!` subject then fails the Conventional Commits `commit-msg` hook. Later Git versions taught the non-interactive rebase to honour the flag, but `-i --autosquash` is correct on every version, so always write that.
3. Run `rtk git rebase --autosquash HEAD~N`, or `-i --autosquash` to review the plan first. Git reorders the tagged commits against their targets automatically.
## Squash by hand (interactive rebase)
@@ -31,46 +29,9 @@ Use this when the commits were not tagged at commit time. **Interactive rebase h
1. Identify the commits to squash — typically the last N on the current branch.
2. Get explicit approval.
3. Run `git rebase -i HEAD~N` — bare, not `rtk`, for the same interactive-editor reason — marking the older commits `squash` to keep their messages for editing, or `fixup` to discard them.
3. Run `rtk git rebase -i HEAD~N`, marking the older commits `squash` to keep their messages for editing, or `fixup` to discard them.
4. Compose the combined message when the rebase stops to ask. For a non-trivial combined message, follow the structure in `references/commit-template.md`.
## When a rebase halts on a conflict
Offer conflict resolution or `rtk git rebase --abort`. Do not resolve conflicts automatically without confirmation.
## Rebase the branch onto a new base
Replays this branch's commits on top of another branch's tip — bringing a feature branch up to
date without a merge commit.
1. Confirm nothing being replayed has been pushed anywhere someone else has based work on. A rebase
gives every replayed commit a new SHA, which breaks any clone that already has the old ones.
2. Get explicit approval — this rewrites history like every other flow on this page.
3. `rtk git fetch origin` first, so `<newbase>` is the real tip rather than a stale local copy.
4. `rtk git rebase <newbase>` — for example `rtk git rebase main`. Use
`rtk git rebase --onto <newbase> <upstream> <branch>` to replay only the commits after
`<upstream>`, which is how a branch started from the wrong base gets moved.
5. The branch has now diverged from its remote. It needs
`--force-with-lease --force-if-includes` to push, never a bare `--force`, and never on
`main`/`master` — refuse that and explain.
## Move the branch pointer back (`git reset`)
`reset` moves the current branch to another commit. The mode decides what survives:
| Mode | Branch pointer | Index | Working tree |
|---|---|---|---|
| `--soft` | moves | untouched — the changes stay staged | untouched |
| `--mixed` (default) | moves | reset — the changes become unstaged | untouched |
| `--hard` | moves | reset | **overwritten; uncommitted work is destroyed** |
- "Undo my last commit but keep the changes" is `rtk git reset --soft HEAD~1`. That is the default
answer to the request; reach for anything else only when the caller asked for it.
- `rtk git reset --mixed HEAD~1` when the staging should be redone from scratch too.
- `rtk git reset --hard <ref>` is gated like a force-push: state exactly which uncommitted changes
will be discarded, get approval for that specific reset, and offer `rtk git stash push -u` first.
The commits it drops stay reachable through `git reflog`; the uncommitted edits never entered git
at all and nothing recovers them.
Reset does not rewrite the commits it leaves behind, so no force-push is needed unless the branch
was already pushed at the newer commit.
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ This skill handles history inspection within the git workflow suite. It queries
## Composition
`git-branches` delegates revert here (see `git-branches`'s `references/merging.md`), which is why this skill carries that operation rather than treating it as out of scope; it is general git knowledge, not drawn from the `history-inspection.md` research corpus. Cherry-pick is **not** this skill's: `git-commits` owns it, and this skill's job ends at locating the SHA to hand over. Server-side commit history on a Gitea-hosted repository belongs to `gitea-branches`; this skill reads the local working copy.
`git-branches` delegates cherry-pick and revert here (see `git-branches`'s `references/merging.md`), which is why this skill carries those two operations rather than treating them as out of scope. They are general git knowledge, not drawn from the `history-inspection.md` research corpus. Server-side commit history on a Gitea-hosted repository belongs to `gitea-branches`; this skill reads the local working copy.
## Usage
+8 -9
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ description: >
`git-commits`. Not a Gitea server's history -> `gitea-branches`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.1"
category: git
source_keys:
- git-scm-bisect-docs
@@ -35,13 +34,13 @@ allowed-tools: Bash
## Step 2 — Query the log
Default to `rtk git log --oneline`, then narrow by whatever is known:
Default to `git log --oneline`, then narrow by whatever is known:
- **Content**: `rtk git log -S"string"`, or `-G"regex"` to match any diff line. `--pickaxe-regex` makes the `-S` argument a POSIX ERE; `--pickaxe-all` shows every file in a matching changeset.
- **A line or function**: `git log -L <start>,<end>:<file>` or `git log -L :<function>:<file>` — bare, not `rtk`: rtk truncates each diff line at ~72 characters (ADR-0023). Confirm the range resolves before reporting on it — an off-by-one silently omits the target.
- **A file across renames**: `rtk git log --follow -- <file>`. Without `--follow` the history stops at the rename boundary.
- **Content**: `git log -S"string"`, or `-G"regex"` to match any diff line. `--pickaxe-regex` makes the `-S` argument a POSIX ERE; `--pickaxe-all` shows every file in a matching changeset.
- **A line or function**: `git log -L <start>,<end>:<file>` or `git log -L :<function>:<file>`. Confirm the range resolves before reporting on it — an off-by-one silently omits the target.
- **A file across renames**: `git log --follow -- <file>`. Without `--follow` the history stops at the rename boundary.
- **Mainline only**: `--first-parent` follows the integration branch and skips commits merged in from side branches.
- **Structured output**: `rtk git log --format="%h | %s | %an (%ar)"`.
- **Structured output**: `git log --format="%h | %s | %an (%ar)"`.
If you need the placeholder catalogue, format presets, `--diff-filter` letters, full `-L` syntax, ancestry filters, pickaxe binary-file behaviour, or `git diff` output-control flags such as `--stat`, `--word-diff` and the whitespace options, read `references/git-log-format.md`.
@@ -49,9 +48,9 @@ If you need the placeholder catalogue, format presets, `--diff-filter` letters,
Offer the operation and its consequence; run it only once the user has chosen.
- Backporting the commit to another branch is a cherry-pick, and cherry-pick is `git-commits`' — it owns the destination-branch check, the `rtk git` wrapper and the `--abort` path. Hand it the SHA; do not run `git cherry-pick` from here.
- `rtk git revert <commit>` adds a new commit undoing it — for un-applying merged work without rewriting history.
- `rtk git blame <file>` attributes each line to the commit that last touched it, when the question is which commit introduced one specific line.
- `git cherry-pick <commit>` copies the commit's changes onto the current HEAD — for backporting a fix to another branch.
- `git revert <commit>` adds a new commit undoing it — for un-applying merged work without rewriting history.
- `git blame <file>` attributes each line to the commit that last touched it, when the question is which commit introduced one specific line.
For diff output control on the located commit, read `references/git-log-format.md`.
@@ -12,43 +12,43 @@ or line range to search the log for. Binary search reduces the trials from O(N)
## Manual flow
```bash
rtk git bisect start
rtk git bisect bad [HEAD] # mark current (or specified) as broken
rtk git bisect good <commit> # mark known-good baseline
git bisect start
git bisect bad [HEAD] # mark current (or specified) as broken
git bisect good <commit> # mark known-good baseline
# Git checks out the midpoint; test it
rtk git bisect good # test passes
rtk git bisect bad # test fails
git bisect good # test passes
git bisect bad # test fails
# Repeat until git reports "X is the first bad commit"
rtk git bisect reset # return to the original HEAD
git bisect reset # return to the original HEAD
```
## Automated
With a test command available, use `rtk git bisect run <cmd>`. Git reads the exit code: `0` good,
With a test command available, use `git bisect run <cmd>`. Git reads the exit code: `0` good,
`1`–`124` bad, `125` skip (build broken), `126`–`127` POSIX shell errors, treated as bad, and
`128` or above aborts the session outright rather than marking the commit bad.
## Untestable commits
`rtk git bisect skip` excludes a commit that cannot be built or tested without deciding good or bad
`git bisect skip` excludes a commit that cannot be built or tested without deciding good or bad
for it. When the first bad commit is adjacent to a skipped range, bisect reports that it cannot
pinpoint the culprit and lists the candidates — that is the precise answer the skip range allows,
not a failure.
## Undoing a wrong good/bad call
`rtk git bisect log` prints the session's decision history. Save it, edit out the mistaken entry, and
`git bisect log` prints the session's decision history. Save it, edit out the mistaken entry, and
resume from the corrected log rather than restarting the search:
```bash
rtk git bisect log > bisect.log
git bisect log > bisect.log
# edit bisect.log, removing the wrong decision
rtk git bisect reset && rtk git bisect replay bisect.log
git bisect reset && git bisect replay bisect.log
```
## Narrowing and speeding up
- `rtk git bisect start HEAD v1.2 -- src/` restricts bisection to a path, cutting the trial count.
- `git bisect start HEAD v1.2 -- src/` restricts bisection to a path, cutting the trial count.
- `--no-checkout` updates the `BISECT_HEAD` ref instead of checking out a working tree — useful
for tests that do not need one, and automatic in bare repos.
- `--first-parent` follows only first parents at merges, finding the integration commit that
@@ -56,12 +56,12 @@ rtk git bisect reset && rtk git bisect replay bisect.log
## Inspecting the remaining candidates
`rtk git bisect visualize` (alias `view`) opens the suspects in gitk, falling back to `git log` when
`git bisect visualize` (alias `view`) opens the suspects in gitk, falling back to `git log` when
no graphical display is detected. Add `--stat` or `-p` for a diffstat or full patches.
## Hunting a non-bug property change
`rtk git bisect start --term-new <new> --term-old <old>` searches for any property change — a
`git bisect start --term-new <new> --term-old <old>` searches for any property change — a
performance regression, say — instead of a bug. Use the custom terms in place of `good` and `bad`
for the rest of the session.
@@ -116,15 +116,15 @@ source_keys:
**`-S<string>`** — finds commits where the **count** of `<string>` changed (i.e. the string was added or removed net). Does not match commits where the string merely appears in a diff hunk without a count change.
```bash
rtk git log -S"my_function"
rtk git log -S"my_function" --pickaxe-regex # treat as POSIX ERE
rtk git log -S"my_function" --pickaxe-all # show all files in matching changesets
git log -S"my_function"
git log -S"my_function" --pickaxe-regex # treat as POSIX ERE
git log -S"my_function" --pickaxe-all # show all files in matching changesets
```
**`-G<regex>`** — finds commits where any added or removed **line** in the patch matches `<regex>`. Broader than `-S`: matches whenever the pattern appears in diff text regardless of count.
```bash
rtk git log -G"frotz\(nitfol"
git log -G"frotz\(nitfol"
```
**Critical distinction:** given a diff that removes one occurrence of `foo` and adds one occurrence of `foo` (net change = 0):
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ Selects commits (in `git log`) or files (in `git diff`) by change type:
Lowercase letters **exclude** that type:
```bash
rtk git log --diff-filter=ad # exclude added and deleted files
rtk git log --diff-filter=M # only show commits with modified files
git log --diff-filter=ad # exclude added and deleted files
git log --diff-filter=M # only show commits with modified files
```
`C` and `R` only appear when copy/rename detection is enabled (`-C`, `-M` flags or `diff.renames` config).
@@ -161,15 +161,11 @@ rtk git log --diff-filter=M # only show commits with modified files
Traces the evolution of a specific range of lines or a named function through commits. Implies `--patch`.
Bare `git`, not `rtk git`, on every `-L` form below: rtk truncates each diff body
line at roughly 72 characters with an ellipsis, on the one query whose whole point
is showing line content.
```bash
git log -L 10,20:file.txt # bare per ADR-0023
git log -L /start_pattern/,/end_pattern/:file.txt # bare per ADR-0023
git log -L :myfunction:src/app.c # bare per ADR-0023
git log -L /init/,+15:config.py # bare per ADR-0023; 15 lines after first /init/ match
git log -L 10,20:file.txt
git log -L /start_pattern/,/end_pattern/:file.txt
git log -L :myfunction:src/app.c
git log -L /init/,+15:config.py # 15 lines after first match of /init/
```
Range formats:
@@ -186,12 +182,12 @@ Limitations: incompatible with `--raw`, `--numstat`, `--shortstat`, `--name-only
## Graph and Ancestry Filters
```bash
rtk git log --first-parent # at merges, follow only first parent (mainline evolution)
rtk git log --merges # only merge commits (≥2 parents); equivalent to --min-parents=2
rtk git log --no-merges # only non-merge commits; equivalent to --max-parents=1
rtk git log --ancestry-path D..M # only commits actually on the path from D to M
rtk git log --min-parents=<n> # include only commits with ≥ n parents
rtk git log --max-parents=<n> # include only commits with ≤ n parents
git log --first-parent # at merges, follow only first parent (mainline evolution)
git log --merges # only merge commits (≥2 parents); equivalent to --min-parents=2
git log --no-merges # only non-merge commits; equivalent to --max-parents=1
git log --ancestry-path D..M # only commits actually on the path from D to M
git log --min-parents=<n> # include only commits with ≥ n parents
git log --max-parents=<n> # include only commits with ≤ n parents
```
`--ancestry-path` is significant: without it, `D..M` includes all commits reachable from M but not D — including side branches that merged into the path. With it, only commits directly between D and M are shown.
@@ -201,34 +197,28 @@ rtk git log --max-parents=<n> # include only commits with ≤ n parents
### --stat
```bash
rtk git diff --stat # diffstat: file names + ± bar
rtk git diff --stat=<width>,<name-width>,<count>
rtk git diff --compact-summary # alongside --stat: shows new/gone, +x/-x (executable), +l (symlink)
rtk git diff --numstat # machine-readable: <added>\t<deleted>\t<path>; - for binary
git diff --stat # diffstat: file names + ± bar
git diff --stat=<width>,<name-width>,<count>
git diff --compact-summary # alongside --stat: shows new/gone, +x/-x (executable), +l (symlink)
git diff --numstat # machine-readable: <added>\t<deleted>\t<path>; - for binary
```
### --name-only / --name-status
Bare `git`, not `rtk git`: rtk appends a blank line and a `Changes:` trailer, so
the output is no longer one record per line.
```bash
git diff --name-only # bare per ADR-0023; only filenames, one per line
git diff --name-status # bare per ADR-0023; status letter + filename per line
git diff --name-only # only filenames, one per line
git diff --name-status # status letter + filename per line
```
`--name-status` uses the same status letters as `--diff-filter`.
### --word-diff
Bare `git`, not `rtk git`: rtk replaces the word-diff with its own diffstat
renderer and emits none of the `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers.
```bash
git diff --word-diff # bare per ADR-0023; inline word-level diff, [-removed-] {+added+} markers
git diff --word-diff=color # bare per ADR-0023; color only, no markers
git diff --word-diff=porcelain # bare per ADR-0023; machine-readable: +/- prefixed lines, ~ for newlines
git diff --word-diff-regex=<re> # bare per ADR-0023; define what counts as a "word"
git diff --word-diff # inline word-level diff with [-removed-] {+added+} markers
git diff --word-diff=color # color only, no markers
git diff --word-diff=porcelain # machine-readable: +/- prefixed lines, ~ for newlines
git diff --word-diff-regex=<re> # define what counts as a "word"
```
### Whitespace Flags
+1 -2
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ description: >
Not submodule pointers -> `git-submodules`.
metadata:
version: "1.0.1"
category: git
source_keys:
- git-scm-remote-docs
@@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ metadata:
## Step 1 — Clear the force-push gate
`main` and `master` are a hard refusal: decline a force-push targeting either, whatever confirmation accompanies it, because no local approval can restore what the remote loses. On any other branch, `rtk git push --force` and `-f` run only after the caller passes `confirm: true` for that specific push — for a human caller, prompt instead of failing.
`main` and `master` are a hard refusal: decline a force-push targeting either, whatever confirmation accompanies it, because no local approval can restore what the remote loses. On any other branch, `git push --force` and `-f` run only after the caller passes `confirm: true` for that specific push — for a human caller, prompt instead of failing.
## Step 2 — Dispatch
Loaded 100 of 266 files, more files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff. Show more