Defame1297 55d956b298 docs: log two lessons from PR #95's fourth review round
The first is new: four fixes specified by the orchestrating reviewer were wrong,
each in a way that would have shipped a guard catching nothing. A finding arrives
with evidence and gets scrutinised; the fix beside it arrives with the same
authority and gets implemented. Worth naming because the failure is silent — the
guard looks right and the suite stays green.

The second is flagged as a graduation candidate rather than promoted: it overlaps
two 2026-08-09 entries on assertions that pin something adjacent to what they
name. Per the graduation rule, promotion to core/instructions/testing.md is the
human's call, not mine.

Refs: #95

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01X7GvKuJfy2WrdBmUttV4DT
2026-08-14 07:09:19 +00:00
Description
AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.
14 MiB
Languages
Shell 89.7%
Python 6.3%
HTML 3.7%
JavaScript 0.3%