Why: ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills. Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88 (apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing). Implementation notes: - All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field, no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory, permissionMode). - Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package, matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice. - .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs. url, Unicode escaping). - plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0 for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped 0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated script (apm has no native version-bump automation). - Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml, scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh, scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures -- including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path isolation regression introduced mid-fix. - Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments. - Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive. Impact: plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on -- editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats, 13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean. Fixes: #90 Refs: #88, #89 ADR: 0015 ADR: 0016 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
3.4 KiB
topic, source_keys
| topic | source_keys | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| label-inference |
|
Label inference guide
Maps context-pattern signals from conversation content (an issue being drafted, a bug report, a PR
description) to this repo's Kind/* / Priority/* / Status/* label taxonomy. Used by
gitea-issues and gitea-prs before creating or updating an issue/PR, and directly when the user
asks to label something without naming exact labels.
Scoped labels are mutually exclusive — replace, don't stack
Each of Kind/*, Priority/*, Status/* is treated as a scoped-label group by convention (the /
delimiter naming pattern). Gitea's exclusive flag — the mechanism that would let the server itself
enforce one-label-per-scope — is documented as an org-labels-only setting, and the repo-level
label_write methods used here don't accept it at all. So exclusivity within these scopes is a
convention this skill enforces client-side, not something the server guarantees: applying a new
label within a scope is expected to replace any existing label in that same scope on the target
issue/PR, not add alongside it. When inference
selects a Priority/High label and the issue already carries Priority/Medium, the write should
result in only Priority/High remaining — use replace_labels scoped to that group's labels, or at
minimum remove the superseded label before adding the new one. Never leave two labels from the same
scope applied at once.
Signal → label mapping
Kind/* (what kind of work this is):
| Signal in context | Label |
|---|---|
| Bug report, error, crash, unexpected behavior, "broken", "doesn't work" | Kind/Bug |
| New capability, "add support for", net-new functionality | Kind/Feature |
| Improvement to existing behavior, "make X better", refactor with behavior change | Kind/Enhancement |
| Docs-only change, README/comment/guide updates | Kind/Documentation |
| Vulnerability, credential exposure, injection risk, auth bypass | Kind/Security |
Priority/* (urgency):
| Signal in context | Label |
|---|---|
| "blocking", "critical", "urgent", production-down | Priority/Critical |
| "soon", "high priority", "should do this sprint" | Priority/High |
| No urgency signal present | Priority/Medium (default) |
Status/* (workflow state):
| Signal in context | Label |
|---|---|
| Explicit statement that the work is blocked on something else | Status/Blocked |
Procedure
- Read the conversation context (issue/PR title, body, or the triggering discussion) for the signals above.
- Call
label_read method: "list_repo_labels"(seereferences/labels.md) to get the current label set with IDs — inference must never guess an ID, only a name, then resolve it. - Match inferred label names against the resolved list (case-insensitive). If a scope group already has a different label applied on the target and a new one is inferred for that same scope, plan to replace rather than add (see above).
- Low-confidence inference omits the label. If no signal confidently maps to a
Kind/*value, do not guess — omitKind/*entirely rather than default to one.Priority/Mediumis the one exception: it's the explicit default when no urgency signal is present, not a guess. - Hand the resolved IDs (plus which scopes to replace) to the caller's
issue_write/pull_request_writecall — this skill does not apply labels to an issue or PR itself.