Defame1297
6cfc3577e2
Finding 13: five blocks of near-identical wording were repeated across skills within a plugin — the gitea "resolve owner and repo" step (5 skills), the 404-masks-403 note (6 files), the manual pagination explanation (8 files), the git plugin's main/master force-push refusal (7 files, some with multiple internal restatements), and the bin skills' domain-glossary/ADR paragraph (5 skills). Tightened each instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting to a shared file, which ADR-0014's one-file-per-skill install constraint rules out. Left the three git skills' structured-result JSON shapes alone (coupled to the separate, out-of-scope git-orchestrate merge candidate, finding 19). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
22 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
22 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
topic: number-resolution
|
|
source_keys:
|
|
- gitea-mcp-repo
|
|
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
|
|
- context7-websites-gitea
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Resolving a bare issue-or-PR number
|
|
|
|
The user has referenced a bare number without saying "issue" or "PR" (e.g. "what's going on with #42"). Resolve it with a real call — never dispatch to `gitea-issues` or `gitea-prs` by guessing from phrasing alone, because "that sounds like a bug" is not evidence and the two domains share one number space.
|
|
|
|
1. Invoke `gitea-issues` to run `issue_read method: "get"` on that number.
|
|
2. Check the response's `is_pull` field:
|
|
- `true` → it's a PR. Invoke `gitea-prs` for full PR detail (status, diff, reviews as appropriate to the request) and present that instead.
|
|
- `false` or absent → it's an issue. Present the issue detail already retrieved.
|
|
3. A 404 here isn't proof the number doesn't exist — Gitea hides permission errors as not-found (see `gitea-issues` Gotchas). Report the 404 and suggest checking the token's `write:issue` scope rather than reporting "no such issue or PR."
|
|
|
|
If the user stated an action on the number rather than asking about it, resolution is only step one: hand the action, with the resolved domain, to `gitea-issues` or `gitea-prs` to carry out. Presenting detail is not a substitute for performing the write.
|
|
|
|
Then report per `SKILL.md`'s Report section, saying which domain the number turned out to be before showing detail ("That's a pull request:" / "That's an issue:") — otherwise the user cannot tell the resolution happened.
|