598a7c326a
Retrofits all 39 skills to ADR-0020's description/body context contract, then fixes what six rounds of independent review found in that retrofit — including four ways the hot gate itself failed open. Closes #99, #107, #108, #110, #111, #114, #115, #120. ## The retrofit (waves 1-5) | | Start | Now | |---|---|---| | Description FAILs (>400 chars) | 26 | **0** | | Body FAILs (>900 words, body-only) | 9 | **0** | | Dangling routing targets | 2 | **0** | | `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` | 10 | **0** | | Preload tax | 21,005 chars | **~10,500** | Under the 12,000-char success criterion. Per-wave detail is on #99. ## The review fixes **The gate failed open four ways, three of them found after the retrofit shipped.** An unrecognised follower token made a dangling target vanish. A skill directory with no `SKILL.md` resolved as a valid target, so a commit could be green locally and red in a fresh clone — three existing fixtures were relying on that, one of which made the install-leak A/B pass vacuously. Then the free-standing `/name` sweep turned out to be gated on the sentence carrying a boundary marker, so route notation in any other sentence was invisible — not an ERROR, not a SUGGESTION, not an INFO — which left the documented "`/name` always blocks" promise false from a second direction. All four fixed and pinned. **Two checks were silently not running.** `validate-provenance.sh` checks 7-8 were dead across nine skills. Waking them exposed a deeper problem: they assume `Research doc:` names a source index, but 30 of 121 entries point at topic content documents, so every new check-7 INFO was a false positive and check 8 was saved from a false-FAIL flood only by an *unannounced* skip. Checks 7/8 are now scoped to source indexes and every skip announces itself (#121). **The retrofit's own anti-goal, four times.** ADR-0020 warns that a blunt gate gets satisfied by deleting content rather than relocating it. `diagnose` and `skill-audit` relocated prose and then read it unconditionally; `prototype` and `vale-config` deleted rules outright that survived nowhere. All four addressed. ## Verification - `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict` — 24 suites, 0 skipped, 0 failed - `bash tests/run-bats.sh` — 325 tests, 0 failures - `pre-commit run --all-files` — 17/17 - `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files` — 16/16, with `apm marketplace check` and `apm pack --check-clean` run against the remote, not skipped - `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` over all 39 skills — rc 0, 0 ERROR/FAIL, SUGGESTION-only - Preload tax measured at **10,498 chars**, max description 390 — both inside budget - Every new test proven non-vacuous by a deliberate mutation of the behaviour it covers **Per-commit sync, stated accurately:** the ten commits from the latest review round each pass `check-plugin-content-sync` in isolation, verified by checking each out in a detached worktree with a clean between. The earlier gitea window (`dfacf05..bedbd1d`, nine commits) does **not** — its mirror was regenerated in one batch at `bbc7300`. An earlier revision of this description claimed the property held for every commit; it does not, and a bisect through that window lands on a red commit. **Squash-merge** to collapse it, or accept that this range is not bisectable. ## Version bump Six plugins and the catalog take a **patch**, not a minor. The branch is **89 commits — 40 `fix` / 30 `refactor` / 12 `docs` / 5 `chore` / 2 `test` — zero `feat`, zero `!`, zero `BREAKING CHANGE`** — and adds no skill, agent, command or hook. (Two earlier revisions of this section cited a stale histogram, most recently 78 commits; the figures above are measured at HEAD.) Both rules this repo ships (`forge/references/version-bump.md`, landing in this PR, and `git-commits/references/conventional-commits-spec.md`) make that a patch, and the catalog set is unchanged at 7 entries. Not settled by that: four published files were removed from the installed tree, three moved, and `caveman` gained `disable-model-invocation`, retiring its old triggers. Under a strict reading those are major-class and currently ship under `refactor:` with no marker. Whether the deployed skill surface is a public contract is written down nowhere — worth deciding, but it outlives this PR. ## Deliberately not in scope #112 (cherry-pick ownership, now resolved in favour of `git-commits`), #113 (`rtk git` normalisation), #116 (research fan-out), #101 (audit-skill merge), #122 (non-spec skill-root files), #123 (no PRD producer) stay open. #117 is the one worth reading: the contract's remedy is to move prose into `references/`, which is exactly where neither the size gate nor Vale looks — and the blind spot is wider than #117 currently records, since there is no root `.vale.ini` at all, so every ADR, `CONTEXT.md` and `README.md` is unlinted too. That blind spot let this branch carry two `level: error` `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` violations into `references/` files it created — `provider-adapter-author/references/provider-matrix.md:31` and `agent-audit/references/finding-criteria.md:95`. Both are reworded in `afadaae`, confirmed by routing each file through the audit's own `vale-wrap.sh` (1 error each before, 0 after). Five further occurrences sit in `references/` files already on `main`; those are the pre-existing corpus and stay with #117, which is the real fix. Also unfixed and not this PR's: `apm install` appends a duplicate `SessionStart` entry to `.claude/settings.json`, so a fresh clone cannot get pre-push green without an edit AGENTS.md warns against. Reproduces identically on `main`. Co-authored-by: Defame1297 <gitea@rkdr.net> Reviewed-on: https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/pulls/129 Co-authored-by: Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP <claude@noreply.git.dev.rkdr.net> Co-committed-by: Claude Code AI - Gitea MCP <claude@noreply.git.dev.rkdr.net>
3.2 KiB
topic, source_keys
| topic | source_keys | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| commits |
|
Commit operations
Read-only commit history, scoped to a repo (optionally to one branch or one path). Call signatures
below were verified live against the deployed gitea-mcp server via ToolSearch, not copied from
research docs, for the same drift-avoidance reason noted in references/branches.md. Last verified
against gitea-mcp v1.7.0, as reported by get_gitea_mcp_server_version.
This domain has no prior skill precedent — it's new coverage added alongside branches because commit history is naturally scoped to a branch (a "what happened on this branch" question), not because it shares any tool family with branch create/delete.
list_commits
Parameters:
owner(string, required)repo(string, required)sha(string, optional) — starting SHA or branch name; if omitted, gitea-mcp uses the repo's default branchpath(string, optional) — restrict results to commits that touched this file/pathpage(number, optional, default:1, minimum:1)per_page(number, optional, default:30, minimum:1)
Call:
list_commits owner: <owner> repo: <repo> sha: <branch-or-sha> path: <optional-path>
Dispatch defaults:
- "commits on
<branch>" → pass<branch>assha. - "commits touching
<path>" (no branch mentioned) → passpathalone,shaomitted (defaults to the repo's default branch). - Both given → pass both; the result is history for that path, walked from that branch/SHA.
- Neither given → omit both; this returns default-branch history, which is a reasonable default for an open-ended "what's the recent history here" question.
Response: one object per commit: sha, html_url, created, message (when available),
author ({name, email, date}, when available).
Paginate per the pagination Gotcha in SKILL.md if you need more than one page of history.
get_commit
Parameters:
owner(string, required)repo(string, required)sha(string, required)
Call:
get_commit owner: <owner> repo: <repo> sha: <commit-sha>
Response: same shape as a list_commits entry, but always fully populated (message and
author are guaranteed present, not conditional). Use this when the user asks about one specific
commit by SHA rather than browsing history — list_commits entries may omit message/author in
edge cases, get_commit will not.
Token scope
Both tools are believed to require write:repository, even though they're read-only — inferred by
analogy with the scope-gating principle confirmed for branch operations in branches.md's Token
scope section (Gitea gates reads behind write scope for repo-scoped operations), not a claim any
doc in this skill makes for commits by name: nothing here enumerates commits under
write:repository explicitly. An earlier version of this doc claimed write:issue alone worked, based on
empirical testing under a token that held both write:issue and write:repository
simultaneously — that test didn't isolate the variable either. Treat this as unverified until
tested under a token scoped to write:issue only (no write:repository).