Files
holocron/plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-audit/SKILL.md
Defame1297 edcc57c0d6 docs: trim skill READMEs and ADR/changelog narration
Two related simplification-audit findings, bundled because they edit
some of the same skill-audit files and splitting would fragment
single-file diffs.

Finding 10: delete 48 per-skill/reference README.md files (they
restated SKILL.md in narrative form and no agent ever loads them) plus
2 scaffold templates. Drop the README criterion from skill-audit's
file-structure.md and finding-criteria.md, and the README-generation
step from skill-author's new-skill.sh; update new-skill.bats to match.
Plugin-root READMEs are kept intentionally, out of scope.

Finding 12: strip historical ADR-0020/ADR-0023 citations and
changelog-style narration from model-facing skill content across
kyberforge and git plugin skills. Delete skill-author's one-time
retrofit.md migration guide and its references. Some ADR-0023 tags
were not narration but check-rtk-prefix's required opt-out marker for
intentionally-bare git commands -- those were restored, not stripped.

Mirror re-synced and full pre-commit/pre-push suite verified green.

Refs: SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md findings 10, 12

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
2026-09-12 18:38:09 +00:00

88 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown

---
name: skill-audit
description: >
Use when the user wants a skill directory audited against the agentskills.io
spec — "audit this skill", "review my SKILL.md", "is this ready to ship" — or
after hand-editing a skill outside skill-author. Not applying fixes ->
skill-author.
allowed-tools: Bash Read
metadata:
version: "1.0.2"
category: factory
source_keys:
- agentskills-home
- agentskills-spec
- agentskills-best-practices
- agentskills-optimizing-descriptions
- agentskills-using-scripts
---
## Gotchas
- Do not narrate PASS/FAIL per check while auditing. Gather findings internally and surface them only in the Step 4 report. Narrating each check as you go is the default failure mode here.
- A skill carrying `disable-model-invocation: true` is hand-invoked — its description is never routed against, so the trigger, capability and boundary rules do not apply. Audit it as one plain human-facing sentence instead.
- `validate.sh` reports two independent length families: the 500-line / 2,770-word pair counts the whole file for spec conformance, while the 250/400-character and 600/900-word pair is the house context budget and its word half counts the **body only**. A skill can sit inside one and fail the other — report them separately.
- Vale reporting `0 files` scanned means NOT RUN, not clean. Fall back to full Step 3 judgment for every dimension it would have covered.
## Step 1 — Deterministic checks
Resolve all three paths against this skill's own directory so they work from a repo checkout and an installed plugin cache alike. Run exactly:
```bash
bash scripts/validate.sh <skill-dir>
bash scripts/validate-provenance.sh <skill-dir>
bash scripts/vale-wrap.sh <skill-dir>/SKILL.md
```
`validate.sh` findings become the `### Structure` dimension — its FAILs and its SUGGESTIONs both, at the tier the script assigned. Report each once; never re-grade one under another dimension. Unresolved boundary targets are where this bites, because their tier turns on notation.
Read `references/validation-scripts.md` when any of the three cannot run or exits non-zero for a reason other than findings, **and whenever `validate-provenance.sh` exits 0 having printed anything**. Ordinary content FAILs are the expected outcome here and need no fallback.
`validate-provenance.sh` reports through exit code **and** output; neither alone is the verdict. **0, silent** is a genuine pass. **0 with output** is INFO-only findings — still a `### Provenance` dimension; `references/validation-scripts.md` says what each obliges — for a check-9 INFO, reading rather than relaying. **1** is FAILs plus any INFOs; it emits Why and Fix itself — surface those verbatim. **2** means it never ran — a usage or environment error, reason on stderr, often no stdout — so report `### Provenance` unverified and quote that reason. Never grade an exit 2, or an exit 0 that printed, as a clean pass.
`vale-wrap.sh` applies the bundled `Kyberforge` style as a prefilter. Pass no `--config`; the wrapper locates its own. Every rule is graded `error`, so every alert is a FAIL. Report each one citing its rule ID, filed under the dimension it belongs to, and do not re-derive it by judgment:
| Rule | Dimension |
|---|---|
| `Kyberforge.DescriptionOpener`, `Kyberforge.CompositionNote`, `Kyberforge.VagueWording` | description |
| `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` | body-discipline |
| `Kyberforge.PaddingPhrase` | patterns |
## Step 2 — Read the whole skill
Read `SKILL.md` and every text file under `scripts/`, `references/`, `assets/` and `tests/`. Skip binaries only — internal-consistency findings need the full picture.
## Step 3 — Qualitative audit
Read `references/finding-criteria.md` first — every dimension's FAIL and SUGGESTION criteria. Load the rubric below only for a dimension the criteria put in play: one carrying a candidate finding, or one where the criterion alone does not settle the call.
| Dimension | Rubric |
|---|---|
| description | `references/description-quality.md` |
| body-discipline | `references/body-discipline.md` |
| patterns | `references/patterns.md` |
| file-structure, internal-consistency | `references/file-structure.md` |
| formatting, scripts | `references/formatting-and-scripts.md` |
Each rubric is self-contained and grounded in the agentskills.io specification plus the house context budget. Cite file and line number for every finding.
## Step 4 — Report
Open with a coverage line naming every dimension checked:
```text
Checked: structure · description · body-discipline · patterns · file-structure · formatting · scripts · internal-consistency · provenance
```
Then output only the dimensions that have findings, grouped under H3 headings, FAILs before SUGGESTIONs within each. Omit clean dimensions — their absence is what confirms they passed.
Each finding:
```text
FAIL/SUGGESTION <finding> — file:line
Why: <why this is a problem>
Fix: <exact change — quote before/after where applicable>
```
Close with a `## Result` block holding one line: `PASS`, `PASS (N suggestions)`, or `FAIL (N fails · M suggestions)`, each optionally followed by ` · P info`. INFO findings are observational and never change PASS/FAIL; omit `· P info` when there are none. Add a second line, `Run skill-author to address findings.`, whenever there is at least one finding. Do not apply fixes — report and propose only.