Defame1297
062ca47a18
A five-agent review of today's seven commits found no executable
regressions and no dangling references, but a set of documents still
asserting, in present tense, machinery that ADR-0024 and its commits
removed. This corrects them in place, keeping the original text as the
historical record wherever the repo's amendment convention applies.
LESSONS.md: the 2026-06-21 entry prescribed a `claude plugin validate`
sweep that now fails on every plugin, so it is marked superseded with
the surviving gates named. The 2026-08-09 entry gained a recurrence
note: today's manifest deletion broke apm's MCP propagation exactly as
that lesson describes, and its prescribed repo-local grep could not
have caught it, because `plugin_parser.py` ships in the apm toolchain
installed outside this repository.
ADR-0019, ADR-0011 and ADR-0021: amendments extended to passages the
earlier correction passes stepped over -- a dead native-consumer guard,
Consequences bullets still calling for a `plugins/gitea/.mcp.json` that
must not be recreated, and a drift-gate list naming a deleted script.
ADR-0021's list is down to one gate, not two: `apm audit --ci` never
read `description` and was never a drift gate.
architecture.md and enrichments.md: the self-containment constraint is
restated on its live source, the agentskills.io APM package-mode spec,
rather than on Claude Code's plugin cache-install, which ADR-0024
consequence 6 pins as a superseded rationale. releasing.md's pointer to
the deleted sync script is rewritten as history.
tests/run-bats.sh and scripts/lib/batch-run.sh: comment-only. The
`.claude/skills/` exclusion comment claimed a duplication that is not
live yet; apm does not strip `tests/`, and the deployed tree is empty
of them only because the lockfile still resolves the six dependencies
to a pre-ADR-0024 commit carrying the flat mirror. The exclusion is
correct but forward-looking, and now says so.
SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md: reconciled against what the commits actually
did. Two closed findings recorded conclusions that ADR-0024 reversed
hours later; findings 1, 3, 31 and 35 carried prescriptions voided the
same day; finding 28 is now recorded as having moved backwards, with
docs/adr/ measured at +336 lines over the day. The section 1 headline
table is re-measured at a6434e0 and labelled with its basis. The
ADR-0012 contradiction between finding 2b and section 8 is resolved in
2b's favour after reading the ADR: only finding 24 is governed by it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD
94 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
94 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
topic: enrichments
|
|
source_keys:
|
|
- gitea-mcp-repo
|
|
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
|
|
- context7-websites-gitea
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Create-flow enrichments
|
|
|
|
Closes out the four enrichments deferred from issue #6 comment #848. Run in this order before the
|
|
`issue_write method: "create"` call in SKILL.md's create dispatch: **labels → milestone →
|
|
assignee → dependency link**. Each step is independent and skippable on its own — a missing
|
|
milestone fit doesn't block label inference, and so on — but this is the order that lets later
|
|
steps use context established earlier (e.g. the inferred `Kind/*` label can inform which milestone
|
|
plausibly fits).
|
|
|
|
**Cross-skill composition note:** none of the steps below read `gitea-labels-milestones`'s
|
|
reference files directly by path. A skill is a self-contained unit: a file reference that leaves
|
|
this skill's own directory is outside what the APM package-mode spec permits, and there is no
|
|
cross-skill file-sharing mechanism to reach for instead — such a path breaks once installed.
|
|
Instead, compose
|
|
`gitea-labels-milestones` as a skill: describe the task to it (its own `SKILL.md` and description
|
|
trigger it) and consume the resolved IDs it returns.
|
|
|
|
## 1. Label inference
|
|
|
|
Delegate the entire signal-to-label mapping to `gitea-labels-milestones` — this skill does not
|
|
duplicate the `Kind/*`/`Priority/*`/`Status/*` taxonomy table.
|
|
|
|
1. Compose `gitea-labels-milestones` to resolve labels for the issue being created: give it the
|
|
draft title/body and ask it to infer and resolve applicable labels (it calls
|
|
`label_read method: "list_repo_labels"` internally and runs its own inference procedure).
|
|
2. Take back the resolved label IDs (and which scope groups, if any, need replacing — not relevant
|
|
yet on a brand-new issue, since there's nothing to replace).
|
|
3. If `gitea-labels-milestones` reports low confidence and omits a `Kind/*` label, pass no `Kind/*`
|
|
ID rather than guessing one yourself. `Priority/Medium` is the one label its own inference
|
|
procedure defaults to when no urgency signal is present — that's expected, not a gap.
|
|
4. Pass the resulting label IDs to `issue_write`'s `labels` parameter (omit the parameter entirely
|
|
if the resolved list is empty).
|
|
|
|
## 2. Milestone assignment on create
|
|
|
|
1. Compose `gitea-labels-milestones` to list open milestones (it calls
|
|
`milestone_read method: "list" state: "open"` internally).
|
|
2. Compare the issue's inferred scope (title, body, and any `Kind/*` label from step 1) against
|
|
each open milestone's title/description. Assign a milestone only when the fit is clear — a
|
|
milestone literally named for the feature area, or one whose description explicitly covers this
|
|
kind of work. A milestone that's merely "the current one" without a clear scope match is not a
|
|
confident fit.
|
|
3. If a milestone clearly fits, pass its **numeric ID** (never the title) as `issue_write`'s
|
|
`milestone` parameter. `issue_write`'s `milestone` field only accepts the ID — see
|
|
`references/issues.md`.
|
|
4. If no milestone clearly fits, omit `milestone` entirely. Guessing a milestone assignment is worse
|
|
than leaving it unset — an issue can always be milestoned later, but a wrong milestone
|
|
assignment pollutes that milestone's issue count and scope.
|
|
|
|
## 3. Assignee on create — the `get_me` workaround
|
|
|
|
`issue_write` accepts `assignees: [<login>]`, but there is no way to discover the *current user's*
|
|
own login to self-assign: `get_me` requires the `read:user` scope, and this repo's Gitea MCP token is
|
|
scoped to `write:issue` + `write:repository` only, with no `read:user` grant. This is a hard
|
|
capability gap, not something to work around with a guess.
|
|
|
|
**Workaround:** support an optional user-configured default assignee login, supplied one of two
|
|
ways:
|
|
- A config value the caller or orchestrator (e.g. `gitea-workflow`) already resolved and passes in
|
|
when invoking this skill.
|
|
- A login explicitly stated in the conversation ("assign this to alice") — use that login directly,
|
|
no lookup needed, since Gitea accepts a login string without requiring you to resolve an ID first.
|
|
|
|
**If neither is available, omit `assignees` entirely.** Do not guess a login, do not fail the create
|
|
over a missing assignee, and do not attempt `get_me`/`search_users` as a fallback — both are blocked
|
|
by the same scope gap and will only produce a confusing secondary error.
|
|
|
|
## 4. Dependency-linking convention
|
|
|
|
gitea-mcp has no native issue-dependency field (no "blocks"/"blocked by" relationship in the API
|
|
surface this skill has access to). The convention is to write **"Depends on #N"** as a line in the
|
|
issue body.
|
|
|
|
This is not just a text convention with no effect — Gitea auto-renders `#N` (and `!N` for PRs) as a
|
|
real clickable cross-reference with no separate API call, a documented platform behavior (see
|
|
`references/sources.md` for the backing research). This works because issues and PRs share one
|
|
repo-scoped number space. Use the bare `#N` form for same-repo dependencies; use `owner/repo#N` for
|
|
a dependency in a different repo.
|
|
|
|
When creating an issue that depends on another, append a line like:
|
|
```text
|
|
Depends on #42
|
|
```
|
|
to the body before calling `issue_write method: "create"`. No separate field or follow-up call is
|
|
involved — the rendering happens automatically once the body is saved.
|