Why: ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills. Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88 (apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing). Implementation notes: - All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field, no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory, permissionMode). - Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package, matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice. - .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs. url, Unicode escaping). - plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0 for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped 0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated script (apm has no native version-bump automation). - Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml, scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh, scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures -- including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path isolation regression introduced mid-fix. - Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments. - Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive. Impact: plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on -- editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats, 13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean. Fixes: #90 Refs: #88, #89 ADR: 0015 ADR: 0016 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
7.5 KiB
name, description, compatibility, metadata, allowed-tools
| name | description | compatibility | metadata | allowed-tools | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gitea-issues | Use when reading or writing Gitea issues: listing repo issues, getting a single issue's details/ comments/labels, creating an issue, updating its state, adding or editing comments, applying labels via issue_write, or searching issues/PRs across repositories. Triggers on "create an issue", "what issues are open", "get issue #N", "close issue #N", "comment on issue #N", "search issues for X" — even when the user doesn't say "Gitea" explicitly. Composes gitea-labels- milestones for all label inference/resolution and milestone lookup — do not use this skill to manage label or milestone definitions themselves (create/edit/delete a label, create/close a milestone), that's gitea-labels-milestones directly. Do not use for pull requests (use gitea-prs) or for local git branch/commit work (use gitea-branches or git-branches). | Requires Gitea MCP server configured with write:issue and write:repository token scopes. Requires git remote "origin" pointing to the Gitea instance for owner/repo resolution when invoked directly by a human; an orchestrating caller (e.g. gitea-workflow) may pass owner/repo already resolved. |
|
Bash mcp__gitea__list_issues mcp__gitea__issue_read mcp__gitea__issue_write mcp__gitea__search_issues |
Gotchas
list_issueshas notypeormilestonesparameter — despiteapi-reference.mddocumenting both. The live MCP schema (re-verified viaToolSearchat authoring time — seereferences/sources.md) only acceptsowner,repo(required),state(default"all"),labels(array of label names),since,before(ISO 8601),page,per_page(default 30). This tool provides no way to filter issues-vs-PRs or by milestone. Since issues and PRs share one number space,list_issuesresults can include PR entries with no client-side filter to exclude them. If you need to know whether a specific number is a PR, callissue_read method: "get"and checkis_pull— that field only appears on the single-item response, never in a list item. This exact drift (a prior skill trusted the research doc'stypeparam and broke) is why this skill's reference files were re-verified live rather than copied fromapi-reference.md.search_issuesdoes have a workingtypefilter ("issues"|"pulls") — unlikelist_issues. Itslabelsparameter is also shaped differently: a comma-separated string, not an array of names.- Labels are numeric IDs on write, name strings on read.
issue_write'slabelsparameter (used byadd_labels/replace_labels) takes IDs.list_issues/issue_readreturn names. Never resolve this yourself — composegitea-labels-milestones(seereferences/enrichments.md) to get IDs. - Milestone on
issue_readis{id, title}— an object, not a bare string. This skill only ever needs theid. (The bare-title-string case only happens on the PR side, which isgitea-prs' problem, not this skill's.) - Closing-keyword auto-close behavior is plausible but unconfirmed in our research docs. Our research docs confirm Gitea does NOT auto-close an issue on a plain PR merge (unlike GitHub) — closing keywords like
Fixes #N/Closes #Nin a commit message are not documented one way or the other. After a PR merges (agitea-prsoperation), always re-check the issue's state here viaissue_read method: "get"before deciding whether to close it manually — closing an already-closed issue is a harmless no-op, but don't assume a manual close is always needed. - Pagination is manual.
list_issuesandsearch_issuesreturn one page at a time. Iteratepage: 1, 2, ...until the returned count is less thanper_page. - HTTP 404 may actually mean 403. Gitea hides permission errors as not-found. If a call 404s unexpectedly, verify the token holds
write:issuescope (seereferences/issues.md's Token scope note) before concluding the issue doesn't exist.
Step 1 — Resolve owner and repo
Before any tool call, extract owner and repo from the git remote (skip this if an orchestrating caller already passed them in):
git remote get-url origin
If origin is not set or the URL is not a Gitea URL, stop and report: "No Gitea remote found — set origin to your Gitea instance URL."
Step 2 — Dispatch
| Invocation | Action |
|---|---|
/gitea-issues or /gitea-issues list |
List issues (optional state filter) |
/gitea-issues create |
Create an issue from conversation context — infers labels, checks milestone fit, applies a configured default assignee if set |
/gitea-issues <N> |
Get issue details (flag it as a PR if is_pull: true) |
/gitea-issues <N> comments |
Get an issue's comments |
/gitea-issues close <N> |
Close an issue |
/gitea-issues comment <N> |
Add a comment from conversation context |
/gitea-issues search <query> |
Cross-repo search via search_issues |
For full parameter detail on list_issues/issue_read/issue_write, read references/issues.md. For search_issues, read references/search.md. For the create-flow enrichments (label inference, milestone assignment, assignee workaround, dependency-linking), read references/enrichments.md.
Step 3 — Execute
list (default)
Call list_issues owner: <owner> repo: <repo> state: <"open"|"closed"|"all", default "all">. Remember: results may include PR entries (see Gotchas) — if the caller needs issues only, this tool cannot filter that server-side; note the limitation rather than silently mislabeling PR entries as issues.
create
- Extract
titleandbodyfrom conversation context (the most recent task, bug description, or explicit statement). Fall back to an empty body if nothing is available. - Run the enrichment sequence in
references/enrichments.md: infer labels (composinggitea-labels-milestones), check for a clearly-fitting open milestone (composing the same skill), and check for a configured default assignee. - Call
issue_write method: "create" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> title: <title> body: <body> labels: [<resolved IDs, or omit>] milestone: <resolved ID, or omit> assignees: [<default login, or omit>]. - Fire immediately — no confirmation step for the create itself.
<N> (get)
Call issue_read method: "get" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N>. If is_pull: true, report that this number is actually a PR and suggest gitea-prs for full detail.
<N> comments
Call issue_read method: "get_comments" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N>.
close <N>
Call issue_write method: "update" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N> state: "closed". No method: "close" exists.
comment <N>
Extract the comment body from conversation context (same sourcing as create). Call issue_write method: "add_comment" owner: <owner> repo: <repo> issue_number: <N> body: <body>.
search <query>
Call search_issues query: <query>, adding owner, state, type, or labels filters if the request narrows scope (e.g. "search open PRs for X" → type: "pulls" state: "open").
Step 4 — Report
For reads: a compact table or numbered list — number, title, state, labels, milestone.
For writes: confirm what was created/updated with the issue number and URL if returned.
For errors: surface the HTTP code and message; check token scope per the Gotchas if a 404 looks wrong.