Files
holocron/plugins/git/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md
Defame1297 14af50bc07 fix(git): scope git-workflow's trigger to ambiguity rather than to its domains
git-workflow's description enumerated the six domains it exists to route away
from, so it competed for selection with the very skills it should be handing
off to. It now triggers on the case it actually serves: an interactive request
whose domain is not yet clear.

Also clears frontmatter drift across the plugin and removes duplicated guidance
in pc-run that had diverged from its reference.
2026-08-31 08:01:39 +00:00

59 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown

---
name: git-workflow
description: >
Use when a human's local git request is general or ambiguous — it routes to the owning
domain skill. Not an unambiguous commit -> `git-commits`. Not an unambiguous branch ->
`git-branches`. Not an agent caller -> `git-orchestrate`. Not Gitea -> `gitea-workflow`.
metadata:
category: git
source_keys:
- nvie-gitflow-post
- atlassian-gitflow-tutorial
- gitflow-cheatsheet
- context7-git-htmldocs
- org-git-conventions
---
## Gotchas
- Session context built during one multi-step request — branch names, the chosen base, the commit
strategy — persists for that request and then clears. Do not re-ask the user for a decision they
already gave you earlier in the same workflow.
- Run parent-repo commands through `rtk git <command>`, never bare `git <command>`. This is a
mandated org wrapper, not a style preference. Submodule-specific commands run from inside the
submodule's own directory instead.
## Workflow
1. **Parse intent** — extract the operation (commit, create branch, rebase, inspect history, …)
and any options the user named.
2. **Check the hard rules** — if the request creates, amends, or rewrites a commit, pushes, or
touches hooks, config, or credentials, read `references/hard-rules.md`. Raise the relevant rule
before acting, not after.
3. **Read the repo** — current branch, working-tree state, and which branching model the repo
follows (the orchestrator reads `branching_pattern` from plugin config; infer from branch names
if absent); the last of those decides which tips are worth offering.
4. **Gate destructive operations** — before force-push, branch deletion, rebase, or
force-checkout, show what will happen and ask "Proceed?". Cancel gracefully if the user
declines. Never supply the confirmation on the user's behalf. Some operations are refusals, not
confirmations: never offer "Proceed?" for a force-push of `main` or `master`.
5. **Invoke the `git-orchestrate` agent** with `operation`, `parameters` (user-provided or
inferred), `context` (step 3 plus the session context), and `confirm: true` only for a
destructive op the user approved in step 4.
6. **Clarify when the orchestrator asks for more** — put its question to the user in plain
language ("Which branch should this be based on?") and loop back to step 5 with the answer.
7. **Report the outcome** — on success, the result and what changed, in plain language; on
failure, the error reason and a recovery action.
## Interaction style
The caller is a human, so the interaction is the point. Explain each step and why it happens ("I'm
squashing your last 3 commits into one clean commit" beats "Squashing commits"), show progress as
you go, and prefer natural language to raw command lines.
Match tips to the repo's branching model rather than offering generic advice: on a Gitflow repo,
feature branches come off `develop` and `main` tracks only released code; on a trunk-based or
GitHub Flow repo, short-lived branches off `main` keep merges small and reviewable.