Files
holocron/plugins/kyberforge/skills/agent-audit/references/description-quality.md
Defame1297 af8b46cd57 chore(plugins): sync generated content mirrors
Regenerate plugins/*/skills/ from plugins/*/.apm/ after the previous
four commits, via scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh --all. The mirror is
generated output (ADR-0017) that check-plugin-content-sync's pre-push
hook diffs against .apm/; nothing here is hand-edited.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EeH8SCbcrCAQrtymkNuhKP
2026-09-07 20:43:51 +00:00

94 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown

---
source_keys:
- context7-websites-code-claude
- claude-code-subagents-docs
- context7-github-en-copilot
- github-custom-agents-configuration
---
# Agent Description Quality Reference
Upstream source: Claude Code subagent reference, GitHub Copilot custom-agents configuration.
House contract: ADR-0020, the context budget. The house contract is narrower than either
platform's schema rather than a reinterpretation of it: where both speak, both must be satisfied.
## Why the description is the expensive part
At startup an agent loads only the `name` and `description` of every installed skill and agent.
The body is never seen until the agent is invoked. The description therefore carries the entire
triggering burden **and** is paid for in every session, whether the agent fires or not.
A second cost is less obvious and is a correctness hazard rather than a token cost: a description
that summarises the workflow is a shortcut the caller takes *instead of* reading the body. A
measured failure upstream — a description saying "code review between tasks" — produced one review
where the body's flowchart specified two.
## Step 0 — establish which contract applies
Read the frontmatter before judging a single word.
- **`disable-model-invocation: true`** — the agent is hand-invoked. Its description is never
matched against user intent, so it is not a routing string. It carries **one plain human-facing
sentence** stating what the agent does. Audit it for that and nothing else. Reporting a missing
trigger clause, a missing boundary clause or absent indirect triggers on a hand-invoked agent is a
wrong finding, not a strict one. The field is Copilot-only and not on the vendor-neutral APM
allowlist, so this case arises in a Copilot `.agent.md` at project/user scope and nowhere else.
Its Claude Code counterpart has no equivalent field and stays model-invoked, so the two halves of
the pair carrying differently shaped descriptions is expected there rather than a
pair-consistency finding.
`user-invocable: false` does not belong in this bullet: it only blocks manual invocation and is
independent of `disable-model-invocation` — an agent can be `user-invocable: false` and still
model-routed, in which case the three-part shape below still applies. It carries no
description-quality contract of its own and is out of this file's scope entirely.
- **No such flag** — the agent is model-invoked and the rest of this file applies.
## The three-part shape
A model-invoked description carries exactly three things:
1. **Trigger clause.** When to invoke, phrased imperatively: `Use when ...`. Not `This agent ...` —
the caller is deciding whether to act, not reading a catalogue entry.
2. **At most one capability clause.** What it does, in one clause. Never an enumeration.
3. **Boundary clause.** Compressed form: `Not <thing> -> <skill-name>.` The target must resolve to
a real skill directory or agent file in the authoring source.
Everything else belongs in the body or in the plugin's `README.md`.
## Indirect triggers — conditional, never blanket
Add "even if the user doesn't say X" **only where the user's natural phrasing genuinely omits the
domain word.** True for the `gitea-*` family: people say "create an issue", not "create a Gitea
issue". False for `git-commits`: nobody asks for a commit without saying commit. A blanket
indirect-trigger clause on an agent whose domain word is unavoidable is padding charged to every
session.
## Near-miss exclusions
Add a boundary clause only where a sibling skill or agent could plausibly steal the activation. Use
strong near-misses — queries that share keywords but need something different — not weak ones. One
boundary clause per genuine near-miss; a list of four is enumeration wearing a boundary's clothes.
## Before / after
```yaml
# FAIL — a noun-phrase opener rather than a trigger, capability enumeration in
# place of one capability clause, and no boundary clause at all, preloaded into
# every session forever. (The live git-orchestrate description, 254 chars.)
description: Orchestrates git workflow operations for other agents. Invoke when a
caller needs a multi-step or destructive git operation (rebase, force-push, branch
deletion) coordinated across domain skills with safety gates, session context, and
structured results.
# PASS — trigger, one capability clause, boundary. The operation list and the
# safety-gate mechanics are the body's job; the router cannot act on them.
description: >
Use when an agent caller needs a multi-step or destructive git operation
dispatched and safety-gated. Not conversational git help -> git-workflow.
```
## Where the criteria live
Every FAIL and SUGGESTION criterion for this dimension is in `references/finding-criteria.md`,
which Step 3 reads on every run. This file is the reasoning behind them, loaded only when that file
puts the description dimension in play.