gitea-issues asserted flatly that a merge never closes an issue, contradicting gitea-prs' references/merging.md, which documents that closing keywords in commits landing on the default branch do close one. The qualifier that made the claim true had been deleted; both sides now agree. gitea-releases had lost an epistemic hedge and its verification step, leaving conventions.md asserting unconfirmed tag auto-creation as fact. Nothing in the research corpus sources it, so the hedge and the verify-afterward instruction are back rather than upgraded. Descriptions were cut 50-240 chars under the 400 budget and shed routing with them: gitea-workflow's boundary named no target, gitea-prs lost the issue/PR number-space directive the suite is built around at 163/400, gitea-releases lost its boundary and every trigger. Restored, inside budget. Also restores delete_branch's hard-refusal strength and gitea-files' Read/Write/Edit pointer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EJJrm5YmacbwMdzZpXcoti
4.5 KiB
name, description, compatibility, metadata, allowed-tools
| name | description | compatibility | metadata | allowed-tools | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gitea-issues | Use when reading or writing Gitea issues — "create an issue", "what issues are open", "close issue #N", "comment on issue #N", "search issues for X" — even when the user does not say "Gitea". Not pull requests -> `gitea-prs`. Not label or milestone definitions -> `gitea-labels-milestones`. | Requires Gitea MCP server configured with write:issue and write:repository token scopes. Requires git remote "origin" pointing to the Gitea instance for owner/repo resolution when invoked directly by a human; an orchestrating caller (e.g. gitea-workflow) may pass owner/repo already resolved. |
|
Bash mcp__gitea__list_issues mcp__gitea__issue_read mcp__gitea__issue_write mcp__gitea__search_issues |
Gotchas
list_issuesmixes in PRs unless you filter. Issues and PRs share one repo number space; passtype: "issues"to exclude PRs (or"pulls"for only PRs). Nothing on a list item flags which is which —is_pullappears only onissue_read method: "get".- Label IDs and names are not interchangeable.
issue_writetakes numeric IDs only;list_issuesandsearch_issuesfilter by name;issue_read "get"returns names but"get_labels"returns full objects with IDs. Resolve viagitea-labels-milestonesunless the caller named exact labels. - A merge does not itself close the issue. Gitea has no close-on-merge event, but a
Fixes #Nin the merged commits can, depending on merge style (gitea-prs). Re-read its state after a merge before closing it manually. - A 404 may really be a 403. Gitea hides permission errors as not-found — check the token's
write:issuescope before concluding the issue does not exist.
Step 1 — Resolve owner and repo
An orchestrating caller may pass owner and repo in already, and the search row is cross-repository and needs only a query — both skip this step. Otherwise, before any tool call:
git remote get-url origin
If origin is unset or the URL is not a Gitea URL, stop and report: "No Gitea remote found — set origin to your Gitea instance URL."
Step 2 — Dispatch
One invocation takes one row. Read only the reference(s) that row names — the call signatures were verified against the live MCP schema and differ from the published API docs in ways the body does not restate.
| Invocation | Flow | Read |
|---|---|---|
/gitea-issues or /gitea-issues list |
List issues with type: "issues" so PRs are excluded, optionally filtered by state |
references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues <N> |
Get one issue, routing to gitea-prs when the number turns out to be a PR |
references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues <N> comments |
Get an issue's comments | references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues <N> labels |
Get an issue's labels as full objects, IDs included | references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues close <N> |
Close an issue by updating its state | references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues comment <N> |
Add a comment drawn from conversation context, never one invented to fill the gap — a comment on a live issue is not cheap to undo | references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues label <N> |
Apply, replace or remove labels using IDs resolved by gitea-labels-milestones |
references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues create |
Create an issue — Step 3 first | references/enrichments.md, then references/issues.md |
/gitea-issues search <query> |
Cross-repo search, narrowed by owner, state, type or labels | references/search.md |
Step 3 — Create
Only the create flow reaches this step.
- Take
titleandbodyfrom conversation context — the most recent task, bug report, or explicit statement. An empty body is an acceptable fallback, an invented one is not. - Run the enrichments in
references/enrichments.md, then create with the resolved IDs perreferences/issues.md. Omitting a parameter always beats guessing its value — a wrong milestone or assignee is harder to notice than a missing one. - Fire immediately, with no confirmation step. A create is cheap to undo by closing, so a gate here only costs a round trip.
Step 4 — Report
Reads: a compact table or numbered list — number, title, state, labels, milestone.
Writes: what was created or updated, with the issue number and the URL when one is returned.
Errors: the HTTP code and message as returned, without paraphrasing either.