fix: point the HUMANS.md counterpart references at the file that exists

Why: three governance documents cited `docs/HUMANS.md`, which has never existed -- the human
practitioner rules live at `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md`. One of the three is
`core/instructions/governance.md`, which is `@`-imported into every session in every project,
so an agent following its "read it when making decisions not covered here" pointer hit a dead
path. That file was self-inconsistent: line 73 already cited the correct path while line 82 did
not.

Implementation notes: five occurrences corrected across three files --
`core/instructions/governance.md:82`, `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md:5,101,106`,
and `docs/ai-constitution.md:238`. Text is otherwise untouched; this is a path correction only,
not a change to any governance rule. Marked the defect fixed in SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md, which
recorded it in two places as outstanding.

Impact: no rule, gate or behaviour changes. The deployed copy at
`~/.claude/core/instructions/governance.md` no longer matches the repo and stays stale until
`scripts/install.sh` re-runs; it was byte-identical before this commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD

.agents/plugins/marketplace.json

@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "holocron",
-  "interface": {
-    "displayName": "holocron"
-  },
-  "plugins": [
-    {
-      "name": "kyberforge",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "local",
-        "path": "./plugins/kyberforge"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Developer Tools"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "bin",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "local",
-        "path": "./plugins/bin"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Utilities"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "git",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "local",
-        "path": "./plugins/git"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Version Control"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "gitea",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "local",
-        "path": "./plugins/gitea"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Version Control"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "core",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "local",
-        "path": "./plugins/core"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Productivity"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "mattpocock-skills",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "url",
-        "url": "mattpocock/skills",
-        "ref": "v1.2.3",
-        "sha": "835450ef244ab7335f75d95b83e7d979eae22a6d",
-        "tag_pattern": "v{version}"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Productivity"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "lint",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "local",
-        "path": "./plugins/lint"
-      },
-      "policy": {
-        "installation": "AVAILABLE",
-        "authentication": "ON_INSTALL"
-      },
-      "category": "Developer Tools"
-    }
-  ]
-}

.claude-plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -43,19 +43,6 @@
       "category": "Productivity",
       "source": "./plugins/core"
     },
-    {
-      "name": "mattpocock-skills",
-      "description": "Skills for Real Engineers — planning, TDD, architecture, and debugging workflows from Matt Pocock's .claude directory.",
-      "version": "1.2.3",
-      "category": "Productivity",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "github",
-        "repo": "mattpocock/skills",
-        "ref": "v1.2.3",
-        "sha": "835450ef244ab7335f75d95b83e7d979eae22a6d",
-        "tag_pattern": "v{version}"
-      }
-    },
     {
       "name": "lint",
       "description": "Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.",

.github/plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "holocron",
-  "description": "AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.",
-  "version": "0.4.6",
-  "owner": {
-    "name": "Defame1297",
-    "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
-    "url": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/"
-  },
-  "plugins": [
-    {
-      "name": "kyberforge",
-      "description": "Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.",
-      "version": "1.6.2",
-      "category": "Developer Tools",
-      "source": "./plugins/kyberforge"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "bin",
-      "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
-      "version": "1.1.7",
-      "category": "Utilities",
-      "source": "./plugins/bin"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "git",
-      "description": "Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.",
-      "version": "1.3.7",
-      "category": "Version Control",
-      "source": "./plugins/git"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "gitea",
-      "description": "Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.",
-      "version": "1.3.8",
-      "category": "Version Control",
-      "source": "./plugins/gitea"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "core",
-      "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
-      "version": "1.1.2",
-      "category": "Productivity",
-      "source": "./plugins/core"
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "mattpocock-skills",
-      "description": "Skills for Real Engineers — planning, TDD, architecture, and debugging workflows from Matt Pocock's .claude directory.",
-      "version": "1.2.3",
-      "category": "Productivity",
-      "source": {
-        "source": "github",
-        "repo": "mattpocock/skills",
-        "ref": "v1.2.3",
-        "sha": "835450ef244ab7335f75d95b83e7d979eae22a6d",
-        "tag_pattern": "v{version}"
-      }
-    },
-    {
-      "name": "lint",
-      "description": "Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.",
-      "version": "1.1.7",
-      "category": "Developer Tools",
-      "source": "./plugins/lint"
-    }
-  ]
-}

.gitignore

@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ apm_modules/
 .claude/skills/
 .claude/agents/
 
+# APM MCP deployment output — `apm install` writes the repo-root .mcp.json from
+# the MCP servers its dependencies declare, and regenerates it on every install.
+# It is apm's output, not repo content; nothing here is hand-authored.
+/.mcp.json
+
 # APM hook deployment output — `apm install` copies each package's referenced
 # hook scripts here and tracks its own settings.json entries in the sidecar.
 # Regenerated on every install; the authoring source is
@@ -47,8 +52,8 @@ build/
 
 # `apm pack`'s manifest for the *root* package. Emitted beside the marketplace
 # manifest by a bare `apm pack`, and never tracked on any branch — the repo's
-# own paths hide it, since sync-plugin-content.sh redirects `apm pack -o` to a
-# scratch tree and the apm-pack-check-clean pre-push hook runs --dry-run. Scoped
+# own paths hide it, since the apm-pack-check-clean pre-push hook, the only
+# thing that runs pack here, passes --dry-run. Scoped
 # to the file, not the directory: the sibling .claude-plugin/marketplace.json is
 # compiled output that IS committed and must stay tracked.
 /.claude-plugin/plugin.json

.mcp.json

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "mcpServers": {
-    "obsidian": {
-      "args": [
-        "@bitbonsai/mcpvault@0.15.0",
-        "docs/"
-      ],
-      "command": "npx",
-      "type": "stdio"
-    }
-  }
-}

.pre-commit-config.yaml

@@ -32,14 +32,21 @@ repos:
         # root-anchored and spells that path out. This was five `(^|/)`
         # any-depth alternatives plus one `^` root-only one -- a mixture with no
         # rationale, under which a fixture or vendored tree containing
-        # `.../.claude-plugin/plugin.json` would have been silently excluded from
-        # formatting while an equivalent `.../.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`
-        # would not. All fifteen real files (3 root marketplace manifests, 2 per
-        # plugin x 6 plugins) match; anything else is hand-authored and gets
-        # formatted.
+        # `.../.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` would have been silently excluded
+        # from formatting while an equivalent
+        # `.../.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` would not. Only the one root
+        # marketplace manifest matches now; anything else is hand-authored and
+        # gets formatted. The twelve per-plugin `plugin.json` alternatives were
+        # dropped with the plugin manifests themselves when native
+        # `claude plugin install` support was removed (ADR-0024) -- apm probes
+        # `apm.yml` and never reached them. The `.agents/plugins/` and
+        # `.github/plugin/` marketplace mirrors went the same way, and their
+        # alternations went with them: `check-useless-excludes` fails on a
+        # pattern that matches no file.
         #
-        # `.claude/settings.json` is the sixteenth, and it is excluded for a
-        # different reason: apm OWNS that file (ADR-0018, ADR-0019), and
+        # `.claude/settings.json` is the second and last alternation, and it is
+        # the only one here for a reason other than "generated manifest":
+        # apm OWNS that file (ADR-0018, ADR-0019), and
         # `apm audit --ci` replays the install into a scratch tree and diffs
         # the result byte-for-byte. `pretty-format-json` sorts object keys
         # unless `--no-sort-keys` is passed, while apm's hook integrator emits
@@ -50,7 +57,7 @@ repos:
         # happened when the SessionStart hook first landed in 2e395a4.
         # Re-running `apm install` fixes the file; leaving it in scope here
         # would re-break it on the very commit that carries the fix.
-        exclude: '^(\.claude-plugin/marketplace\.json|\.agents/plugins/marketplace\.json|\.github/plugin/marketplace\.json|plugins/[^/]+/\.claude-plugin/plugin\.json|plugins/[^/]+/\.github/plugin/plugin\.json|\.claude/settings\.json)$'
+        exclude: '^(\.claude-plugin/marketplace\.json|\.claude/settings\.json)$'
       - id: check-yaml
         stages: ['pre-commit']
       - id: trailing-whitespace
@@ -75,33 +82,6 @@ repos:
         pass_filenames: false
         always_run: true
 
-      - id: check-manifests
-        name: Check plugin manifests
-        description: Validate marketplace.json and plugin.json paths
-        entry: bash scripts/check-manifests.sh
-        language: system
-        stages: [pre-push]
-        pass_filenames: false
-        always_run: true
-
-      - id: check-plugin-content-sync
-        name: Check plugin content sync
-        description: Verify each plugin's flat skills/agents/commands/hooks/hooks.json mirror is in sync with .apm/ -- Claude Code has no .apm/ awareness so this compiled mirror must stay current (see issue #90)
-        entry: bash scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh --check --all
-        language: system
-        stages: [pre-push]
-        pass_filenames: false
-        always_run: true
-
-      - id: check-marketplace-mirror-sync
-        name: Check marketplace mirror sync
-        description: Verify .github/plugin/marketplace.json (Copilot CLI's legacy manifest path) is byte-identical to .claude-plugin/marketplace.json -- apm has no output profile for this path, so it must be kept in sync explicitly (see issue #90)
-        entry: bash scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh --check
-        language: system
-        stages: [pre-push]
-        pass_filenames: false
-        always_run: true
-
       - id: check-executables-allow-sync
         name: Check executables allow key sync
         description: Verify root apm.yml's executables.allow key names kyberforge's actual version -- apm matches that key by exact "<package>#<version>" lookup, so a version bump on one side alone silently stops deploying kyberforge's hooks/ and bin/ and lets the apm install go stale (see ADR-0019)
@@ -111,15 +91,6 @@ repos:
         pass_filenames: false
         always_run: true
 
-      - id: apm-marketplace-check
-        name: apm marketplace check
-        description: Validate every marketplace.packages[] entry resolves, including network reachability of remote refs -- catches stale/unreachable remote package references that check-manifests.sh deliberately skips (local-source checks only)
-        entry: apm marketplace check
-        language: system
-        stages: [pre-push]
-        pass_filenames: false
-        always_run: true
-
       - id: apm-audit-ci
         name: apm audit --ci
         description: Run apm's producer-side CI gate over the root manifest AND each of the six plugin packages. Verifies exactly two things per manifest -- apm.yml parses as a valid APM manifest (manifest-parse), and, if it declares dependencies, apm.lock.yaml exists and is consistent (lockfile-exists). It does NOT enforce an org policy and does NOT scan for hidden Unicode; see the comment below for why. Reference:plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/apm-workflow/references/audit.md
@@ -162,8 +133,8 @@ repos:
         # six plugin packages is what makes either reachable for them at all --
         # the root-only invocation audits the marketplace manifest and nothing
         # else. Costs ~0.5s per package, needs no network (checked under
-        # `unshare -rn`), so this does NOT join apm-marketplace-check and
-        # apm-pack-check-clean on the offline SKIP= list.
+        # `unshare -rn`) -- consistent with every other pre-push hook: none of
+        # them need the network (see README.md's "Offline?" section).
 
       - id: check-apm-agents-valid
         name: Validate real APM agent files
@@ -229,15 +200,6 @@ repos:
         pass_filenames: false
         always_run: true
 
-      - id: validate-plugins
-        name: Validate plugins
-        description: Run claude plugin validate --strict on every plugin directory
-        entry: bash -c 'for d in plugins/*/; do claude plugin validate --strict "$d" || exit 1; done'
-        language: system
-        stages: [pre-push]
-        pass_filenames: false
-        always_run: true
-
       - id: validate-marketplace
         name: Validate marketplace manifest
         description: Run claude plugin validate --strict on the root marketplace manifest
@@ -247,87 +209,6 @@ repos:
         pass_filenames: false
         always_run: true
 
-      - id: skill-frontmatter
-        stages: ['pre-commit']
-        name: SKILL.md frontmatter validation
-        description: Ensure SKILL.md files have required frontmatter fields
-        entry: bash
-        language: system
-        files: '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$'
-        # Pinned by tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh, which drives this exact
-        # `bash -c <script> <arg0> <files...>` call shape rather than a copy of
-        # the script -- the bug below was invisible to any test that did not.
-        args:
-          - -c
-          - |
-            # Every check reads the FRONTMATTER only, never the whole file. A
-            # `metadata:` / `name:` / `description:` line inside a body code
-            # fence is documentation (skill-author quotes exactly such a block)
-            # and used to satisfy these greps.
-            for f in "$@"; do
-              [[ -f "$f" ]] || continue
-
-              fm="$(awk '
-                { sub(/\r$/, "") }
-                NR == 1 { sub(/^\357\273\277/, "") }
-                !opened && /^[[:blank:]]*$/ { next }
-                !opened {
-                  if ($0 ~ /^---[[:blank:]]*$/) { opened = 1; next }
-                  exit
-                }
-                /^---[[:blank:]]*$/ { closed = 1; exit }
-                { print }
-                END { if (!opened || !closed) exit 3 }
-              ' "$f")" || {
-                echo "ERROR: $f has no closing YAML frontmatter block (expected --- ... --- at the top of the file)"
-                exit 1
-              }
-
-              missing=""
-              printf '%s\n' "$fm" | grep -q "^name:" || missing="${missing}name: "
-              printf '%s\n' "$fm" | grep -q "^description:" || missing="${missing}description: "
-
-              # Scoped to the `metadata:` block and stopped at the next
-              # top-level key, so a `version:` under a following `source:` list
-              # cannot stand in for it; the `^  version:` anchor is exact, so a
-              # deeper-nested `    version:` cannot either. No line budget, so a
-              # long `metadata:` block does not hide the key.
-              ver="$(printf '%s\n' "$fm" | awk '
-                /^metadata:/ { inm = 1; next }
-                inm && /^[A-Za-z]/ { exit }
-                inm && /^  version:/ {
-                  v = $0
-                  sub(/^  version:[[:blank:]]*/, "", v)
-                  sub(/[[:blank:]]+#.*$/, "", v)
-                  sub(/[[:blank:]]+$/, "", v)
-                  print "found:" v
-                  exit
-                }
-              ')"
-              [[ -n "$ver" ]] || missing="${missing}metadata.version "
-
-              if [[ -n "$missing" ]]; then
-                echo "ERROR: $f is missing required frontmatter fields (${missing})"
-                exit 1
-              fi
-
-              raw="${ver#found:}"
-              v="$raw"
-              case "$v" in
-                \"*\") v="${v#\"}"; v="${v%\"}" ;;
-                \'*\') v="${v#\'}"; v="${v%\'}" ;;
-              esac
-              if [[ ! "$v" =~ ^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$ ]]; then
-                echo "ERROR: $f has a malformed frontmatter metadata.version (${raw:-<empty>}) -- expected a three-part semver, e.g. \"1.0.0\""
-                exit 1
-              fi
-            done
-          # arg0 for `bash -c`. WITHOUT it pre-commit's first filename lands in
-          # $0 and is dropped from "$@" -- so a single-file commit, the normal
-          # case, ran the loop zero times and reported Passed having checked
-          # nothing. Do not remove; tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh pins it.
-          - skill-frontmatter
-
       - id: skill-size-check
         stages: ['pre-commit']
         name: SKILL.md size and context-budget ceilings

AGENTS.md

@@ -6,16 +6,10 @@ This file carries only what applies to **every** session. Setup, prerequisites,
 
 ## Structure
 
-- `plugins/` — six installable plugin units, each an apm package (`apm.yml` + `.apm/`). Root `apm.yml` declares all six as `dependencies.apm`; `apm install` deploys them into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`, both gitignored install output.
-- `providers/claude-code/` — Claude Code adapter, deployed to `~/.claude/` via `scripts/install.sh`.
+- `plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the only authoring source for plugin content. `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/` are gitignored `apm install` output — never edit them.
+- `providers/claude-code/` is the Claude Code adapter, deployed to `~/.claude/` by `scripts/install.sh`.
 
-## Edit `.apm/`, never the flat mirror
-
-`plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the only hand-edited source for plugin content. The flat `plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,commands,instructions,extensions}/` directories, the merged `plugins/<name>/hooks/hooks.json`, and both `plugin.json` manifests are generated — nothing marks them as generated, so check the path before you edit. An edit to the mirror is discarded by the next sync and reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook.
-
-Not everything in a plugin root is generated. `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json` and per-plugin extras are hand-authored there with no `.apm/` source — edit those in place. The rule is per-path, not per-directory. But a file placed *inside* a mirrored directory is deleted on the next sync (`sync_dir` runs `rm -rf` before every copy), so plugin-root documentation goes in `docs/`, never in `hooks/` or `skills/`.
-
-Full model: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
+Repo layout table: `README.md`. Deployment mechanics and plugin boundaries: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
 
 ## Prefer plugin skills over raw shell
 
@@ -34,9 +28,9 @@ Fall back to raw shell only when no skill covers it.
 ## Session rules
 
 - **Do not add repo-owned keys to `.claude/settings.json`.** apm treats it as its own deployed artifact and `apm audit --ci` replays the install and diffs, so anything apm would not have written is permanent drift that fails the `apm-audit-ci` pre-push hook. A hook you want here is authored in `plugins/<name>/.apm/hooks/` and deployed by apm, never hand-written into that file. The `SessionStart` entry already in it is exactly that: kyberforge authors it in `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/hooks/hooks.json` and apm merges it in, so it is apm's own output, it is what the replay expects, and it belongs in the commit — do not strip it (ADR-0019). Machine-specific settings go in the gitignored `.claude/settings.local.json`; shared enforcement goes in `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
-- **`apm.lock.yaml` turning up modified is expected, not a bug.** kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook runs `apm outdated` at startup and `apm update --yes` when something is behind, which rewrites the lock. Commit or discard it deliberately.
+- **`apm.lock.yaml` turning up modified is expected, not a bug.** kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook keeps the install current on launch and rewrites the lock in the process (ADR-0019). Commit or discard it deliberately.
 - **A `.apm/` edit is not live in this session until it is pushed.** The six dependencies resolve from the holocron remote, unpinned against the default branch. `apm install` deploys from the lock; `apm update` is what re-resolves refs.
-- **Pushing without a network** needs `SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push` — those two resolve a remote marketplace entry via `git ls-remote`. Skip only those two; the rest are real local checks, and adding one to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
+- **No pre-push hook needs the network.** Root `apm.yml`'s marketplace has no remote package entries, so every hook resolves locally.
 - **This repo and Gitea are the only source of truth.** All project state, decisions, and working conventions live here. Do not use an external memory system for this project — cached state diverges from the repo and you get a split brain. Before answering any design or architecture question, check `docs/adr/` for an existing decision.
 
 ## Key documents

CONTEXT.md

@@ -14,22 +14,6 @@ decisions.
 
 ### Context cost
 
-**Preload tax**:
-The always-on context cost of every installed skill's `name` and `description`, charged from the
-first token of every session whether the skill is invoked or not. Measurement method: ADR-0020. Its
-**23,427 characters is the pre-retrofit baseline, not a current reading** — measured at the decision
-commit, before #99. Across the same 39 skills it is **10,478 characters** (~2,620 tokens) as of
-2026-09-01. Both figures move with the corpus, so re-derive rather than quote either: sum
-`len(name) + len(description)` over the frontmatter of every `plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`,
-folding block scalars as `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` does.
-_Avoid_: context cost, token overhead
-
-**Skill context contract**:
-The ADR-0020 authoring rules that hold the preload tax and body size down — a description carries a
-trigger clause, at most one capability clause, and a boundary clause, and nothing else. Thresholds
-and the target-resolution walk: `docs/spec/gates.md`.
-_Avoid_: skill budget, size limit
-
 **Routing target**:
 The skill or agent name a boundary clause sends work to. It **resolves** when a skill or agent of
 that name is reachable from the file being checked, and **dangles** when none is — a route the router
@@ -66,27 +50,18 @@ A reusable slash command defined as a `SKILL.md` file following the
 `plugins/<plugin>/.apm/skills/<skill>/SKILL.md`.
 _Avoid_: command, prompt, macro
 
-**Plugin**:
-The deployable unit — one or more skills, agents, hooks, commands, and MCP servers bundled into a
-single installable directory under `plugins/<name>/`, compiled from that plugin's `.apm/` source.
-_Avoid_: package, bundle, module
-
 **apm package**:
-The unit apm builds and installs — `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` plus the hand-authored
-`plugins/<name>/.apm/` tree it compiles from (ADR-0015).
-_Avoid_: plugin directory, source tree
-
-**Content mirror**:
-The generated flat `skills/`, `agents/`, `commands/`, `instructions/`, `extensions/` directories and
-merged `hooks/hooks.json` at a plugin root — also called the flat mirror — compiled from that
-plugin's `.apm/` tree so hosts that convention-scan those paths discover the content (ADR-0017).
-_Avoid_: generated copy, duplicate tree
+The deployable unit apm builds and installs — one or more skills, agents, hooks, commands, and MCP
+servers under a single directory `plugins/<name>/`, consisting of that directory's `apm.yml` plus
+the hand-authored `plugins/<name>/.apm/` tree it deploys from (ADR-0015).
+_Avoid_: bundle, module, source tree; and bare "plugin" for the *installable artifact*, which since
+ADR-0024 is an apm package and not a Claude Code plugin. "Plugin" stays correct as a modifier in the
+repo's settled compounds — **Plugin marketplace**, "plugin units", `plugins/`.
 
 **Output profile**:
-An `apm pack` target format for a generated *marketplace* manifest; apm has `claude`
-(`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`) and `codex` (the differently-shaped
-`.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`), and none for `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` (Copilot CLI's
-legacy path), which a sync script mirrors instead. Mechanics: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
+A named ecosystem format `apm pack` can compile the marketplace manifest into, declared per profile
+under root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace.outputs:`. apm defines `claude` and `codex`; each writes to its
+own default path unless overridden. Mechanics: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
 _Avoid_: build target, export format
 
 **Plugin marketplace**:
@@ -99,12 +74,6 @@ This repository, in its role as a plugin marketplace and as the remote the six p
 resolve against.
 _Avoid_: the marketplace, upstream
 
-**apm-consumed install**:
-How this repo installs its own plugins as of 2026-08-14 — six `dependencies.apm` entries in the root
-`apm.yml` deployed by `apm install`, rather than `claude plugin install <name>@holocron`. Its
-consequences: ADR-0018.
-_Avoid_: apm install, dependency install
-
 **Provenance chain**:
 The three-stage traceability record linking a skill back to its research inputs: `/research` produces
 topic docs and a `sources.md`; the author skill records which sources informed which files in
@@ -120,18 +89,6 @@ irreversible or high-stakes actions — architecture changes, production deploym
 configuration.
 _Avoid_: manual approval, gated action
 
-**HOTL** (human-on-the-loop):
-The agent acts and a human monitors, able to intervene after the fact. Acceptable only for
-low-stakes, bounded, reversible actions where the cost of pausing exceeds the blast radius of an
-error.
-_Avoid_: autonomous, unsupervised
-
-**Sycophancy**:
-The failure mode where an RLHF-trained model prioritises approval over accuracy — changing a correct
-answer to a wrong one under user pressure, then persisting in the wrong answer. Treated here as a
-first-class reliability risk, not a quality-of-life concern.
-_Avoid_: agreeableness, people-pleasing
-
 ### Documents
 
 **AGENTS.md**:
@@ -149,12 +106,6 @@ _Avoid_: wrapper, shim, provider file
 The long-loop feedback log for patterns observed across sessions, at the repo root.
 _Avoid_: changelog, retro, postmortem
 
-**Management Application**:
-A separate product in a separate repo for browsing, editing, and configuring AI development configs
-through a product UI, with Git as an invisible persistence layer. Repo-agnostic; this repo is its
-canonical default content. Roadmap: `docs/VISION.md`.
-_Avoid_: the UI, the dashboard, the app
-
 ### Quality
 
 **Skill composition**:
@@ -162,11 +113,6 @@ A skill calling another skill by name to delegate a sub-task — the caller owns
 decision ("when to do X"), the callee owns the mechanics ("how to do X").
 _Avoid_: chaining, nesting, sub-skill
 
-**Vale audit prefilter**:
-The deterministic Vale pass that runs ahead of `skill-audit`/`agent-audit`'s Description dimension,
-so LLM judgment is spent only on what a pattern cannot catch. Mechanics: `docs/spec/gates.md`.
-_Avoid_: linting, style check
-
 **Authoring root**:
 The directory a gate resolves against — the nearest ancestor of the file being checked holding
 `plugins/*/.apm/skills` or `plugins/*/.apm/agents`, falling back to the nearest ancestor holding
@@ -179,11 +125,6 @@ sibling that would wrongly answer it; boundary clauses exist to exclude genuine
 than to enumerate siblings. Detail: `skill-audit/references/description-quality.md`.
 _Avoid_: overlap, similar skill
 
-**Vacuous green**:
-A check that reports success because it measured nothing — zero files scanned, an unparsed value read
-as empty, a conditional branch that never armed.
-_Avoid_: false pass, clean run
-
 **Issue**:
 The cross-provider term for a tracked unit of work. Gitea is this repo's canonical tracker
 (ADR-0007), but skills say "linked issue" generically rather than naming a provider.
@@ -191,20 +132,14 @@ _Avoid_: ticket, card, task
 
 ## Relationships
 
-- A **Plugin** bundles one or more **Skills** and agents; a **Plugin marketplace** lists **Plugins**;
-  **holocron** is this repo wearing that hat.
-- Every model-invocable **Skill** pays the **Preload tax**. A **Hand-invoked skill** does not — which
-  is the first question to settle when authoring one.
-- The **Skill context contract** bounds both the **Preload tax** (description) and the body.
-  A **Dispatch body** is how a skill stays inside it; **Delegation discipline** is how an agent does.
+- An **apm package** bundles one or more **Skills** and agents; a **Plugin marketplace** lists
+  **apm packages**; **holocron** is this repo wearing that hat.
 - **AGENTS.md** is the source of always-on rules; a **Thin adapter** imports it and originates
   nothing.
 - **Skill composition** is the caller/callee split. `forge` routes a genuinely *undecided* artifact
   type to the matching author skill — an already-specified fix (file, line, and change known) calls
   that author skill directly, because each routing hop re-derives instructions from a shorter brief
   and has been observed to drop hard constraints handed down the chain.
-- **HITL** and **HOTL** are exclusive per action class, and the choice must be explicit and
-  documented. **Sycophancy** is why HOTL is not the safe default.
 - A **Skill** built on research carries a **Provenance chain**; `skill-audit` fails it when broken.
 - **LESSONS.md** feeds the standing files: three or more entries on one pattern graduate the pattern
   into the relevant standing document.
@@ -233,8 +168,13 @@ _Avoid_: ticket, card, task
 - Skills can answer to two names, bare (`gitea-prs`) and namespaced (`gitea:gitea-prs`), depending on
   whether a native install exists at user scope alongside the apm one (ADR-0018) — resolved: write
   the bare name, which is the only form `apm install` produces.
-- "context" means both the model's live token window (the **Preload tax** sense) and the bounded
-  domain this file describes — resolved: unqualified "context" in this repo means the token window.
+- "plugin" was used both for the installable artifact under `plugins/<name>/` and as a modifier in
+  settled compounds (**Plugin marketplace**, "plugin units", the `plugins/` directory itself) —
+  resolved: the installable artifact is an **apm package**, because ADR-0024 ended native
+  `claude plugin install` support and it is no longer a Claude Code plugin in any operative sense;
+  the compounds keep the word and are not being renamed.
+- "context" means both the model's live token window and the bounded domain this file describes —
+  resolved: unqualified "context" in this repo means the token window.
 - "audit" was used for both an author skill's inline closeout and `forge`'s independent
   clean-context recheck — resolved: these are two distinct layers, kept separate precisely because
   an audit running in the same context as the work it checks shares that work's blind spots.

LESSONS.md

@@ -10,246 +10,126 @@ Patterns observed during development of this repo. Three or more entries on the
 
 ---
 
-## 2026-05-17 — Workflow documents should prescribe sub-agent usage, not just allow it
-
-When writing workflow documents (like `docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md`), the natural tendency is to describe steps at a high level and leave sub-agent usage as an implementation detail. But if the workflow doesn't explicitly prescribe "spawn a sub-agent here," practitioners default to doing everything in the main context — accumulating token cost and losing the isolation benefit. Fix: make sub-agent usage a named step in the workflow, specifying what the agent receives, what it returns, and why it's isolated. This makes the workflow reproducible rather than dependent on the practitioner remembering to use agents.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Conflict check before synthesis grill, not during
-
-When combining upstream sources into a skill, conflicts with governing documents (AI constitution, factory principles) tend to surface in the middle of the synthesis grill — disrupting the combining discussion and requiring context switches. Fix: run a dedicated conflict-check step before the grill. A sub-agent reads the governing documents, checks the upstream content against them, and returns a numbered list of tensions. The grill then starts with those items as explicit agenda points, making it faster and more systematic. An empty conflict list is also valuable — it confirms the upstreams are clean before co-writing begins.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Cross-references to "produced by issue N" rot before the session ends
-
-Issue files frequently referenced "the workflow defined in `docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md` (produced by issue 0016)." Within the same session that closes issue 0016, that parenthetical is already stale — the document exists and is the authoritative reference. Fix: reference the document path directly, not the issue that produced it. The git history records the producing issue; cross-references should point to the artifact that persists.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — "Read at session start" is a behavioral hope, not a guarantee
-
-The repo CLAUDE.md instructs agents to read CONTEXT.md at session start, but agents skip this in practice — defaulting to reading only what's directly relevant to the immediate prompt (e.g. the skills folder). The governance.md works because `@import` is technically enforced by Claude Code. Fix: (1) add `@CONTEXT.md` to repo CLAUDE.md using `@import` to make it always-loaded; (2) add a "Key decisions" section to CONTEXT.md with one-line resolved-ADR summaries so locked choices are always in context.
-
-**Status (2026-08-14): neither part landed.** Root `CLAUDE.md` imports `@AGENTS.md` only — no `@CONTEXT.md` — and `CONTEXT.md` has no "Key decisions" section. The behavioral hope this entry diagnosed is still the only mechanism in place: `AGENTS.md` carries the line "Read `CONTEXT.md` at the start of every session," which is loaded but is itself an instruction, not an import. The proposal above is open work, not a record of a completed change.
-
 ## 2026-05-17 — Instruction rules lose to RLHF defaults without specificity
 
-Behavioral tests (2026-05-17) showed three communication/behavior rules failing: exploratory question format (gave verbose multi-bullet answer instead of 2-3 sentences), file edit intent (asked for clarification instead of stating intent and proceeding), and push confirmation (went straight to tool call instead of asking first). All three rules are present in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` as one-liner statements. The RLHF-trained defaults (thorough answers, risk-averse clarification seeking, fast execution) consistently outcompete thin rules. Fix: rewrite failing rules with specificity, a counter-example, and a boundary statement — not just a single-line imperative.
+Behavioral tests found three one-line rules in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` (exploratory-answer format, edit-intent statement, push confirmation) all failed in practice — RLHF defaults (thoroughness, caution, fast execution) outcompete thin imperatives. Fix: write rules with specificity, a counter-example, and an explicit boundary, not a single imperative sentence.
 
 ## 2026-05-17 — Secrets rule gap: response text not covered
 
-The secrets prohibition in `core/instructions/governance.md` fired correctly when asked to write a password to a file, but the agent then reproduced the literal credential in its response text (in a shell `export` example). The rule was interpreted as "don't write to files" not "don't output at all." Fix: the rule needs to explicitly state "never produce the credential value in any output" and give an example showing placeholder usage (`export DB_PASSWORD='<your-password>'`).
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Synthesis grill and SKILL.md co-write are two separate conversations
-
-The synthesis grill (step 4) answers schema-level questions: how to combine upstreams, which eval schema to use, merge behaviour. Step 5b is a different conversation: how upstream content maps to each SKILL.md body section, what options each section had, and which was chosen. Collapsing them — writing the SKILL.md immediately after the grill without a per-section walk-through — means the human never sees the upstream options for the body and has no opportunity to redirect before the file is written. Fix: step 5b is now a named gate in the workflow. Walk through every body section one at a time, cite the upstream source, present alternatives, get confirmation. Only then write. Applies to both hand-written (bootstrap) and write-skill-produced skills.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Skill-calls-skill composition must be a named process step
-
-When a skill invokes another skill as part of its work (e.g. write-skill invoking write-eval to produce the eval), that call must be a numbered step in the Process section — not left as an implicit external workflow step. If it isn't named, practitioners either forget it or do it manually outside the skill, breaking the composition chain. The user caught this during the write-skill co-write; it was absent from the process despite being in the workflow doc. Fix: when designing any skill that composes another, list each composed call explicitly as a numbered step with a "do not mark complete until X exists" constraint.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — AGPL-3.0 repos appear prominently in community skill search results
-
-When searching GitHub for agent skill upstreams, AGPL-3.0 repos (e.g. dceoy/speckit-agent-skills) appear alongside permissive-licensed ones without obvious visual distinction. AGPL imposes copyleft obligations on adopted content. Always run a licence check (GitHub API `/license` endpoint) before extracting any content from a new upstream. An AGPL finding is a hard exclude — record the repo, SHA, and licence in source review notes so future sessions don't re-review it.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Trigger description gate is not satisfied by embedding it in the section walk-through
-
-The per-skill workflow (and write-skill's own process step 4) requires testing the trigger description against 3 cases — explicit, implicit, negative — as a standalone gate with explicit PASS/FAIL markers before any body content is written. During write-docs (issue 0018 phase 2), the trigger description was included in the section walk-through (step 5b) rather than tested first as a named gate. The gate never had explicit pass/fail output, which means neither the human nor the agent confirmed the trigger was sound before section content was written. Fix: treat the trigger test as a numbered standalone step with per-case PASS/FAIL output before step 5b begins. A section walk-through that happens to include the description field is not a substitute.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — write-eval confirmation gate is bypassed when called via sub-agent with pre-designed cases
-
-write-eval's process requires presenting the full test plan and waiting for user confirmation before writing the file. When write-eval is invoked by passing pre-designed test cases directly to a write sub-agent, this gate is skipped — the file is written before the user sees the plan. This happened during write-docs (issue 0018 phase 2). Fix: when orchestrating write-eval as part of a larger workflow, split into two steps: (1) sub-agent proposes test cases and returns to the main conversation; (2) after user confirmation, sub-agent writes the file. Or: design cases in the main conversation, present them to the user, then spawn the write agent. The plan-then-write separation is the gate — collapsing it into a single sub-agent call silently removes it.
-
-## 2026-05-18 — Skill body sections were cargo-culted, not spec-defined
-
-The write-skill authoring standard required 8 body sections including Role and When/When not. These were assumed to be agentskills.io requirements. Checking the actual spec revealed the body has no format restrictions at all — recommended sections are step-by-step instructions, examples, and edge cases. Role and When/When not were added by convention without verifying the standard. Fix: before encoding any requirement as part of an authoring standard, check the upstream spec directly. The agentskills.io spec also confirmed that negative triggers belong in the description field — not in a separate body section — which eliminates a persistent duplication pattern across all skills.
-
-## 2026-05-18 — Copy-fill is more deterministic than generate for structured skill artifacts
-
-When a skill produces a structured artifact like SKILL.md, the natural approach is to generate it from internalized rules in the Process section. But this means section structure is only as reliable as the agent's instruction-following under token pressure. Copy-fill (copy the template to the target path, then fill in content) separates structure from content: the template mechanically enforces section order and presence, freeing the Process section to focus only on sequencing constraints (what order to decide things) rather than also policing structure. Side benefit: the template is a human-usable artifact that can be adopted independently of the skill. Fix applied in write-skill refactor: SKILL-TEMPLATE.md is the authoritative structure source; the Process section no longer contains a body structure constraint — the template handles it.
+The governance.md secrets rule blocked writing a password to a file, but the agent then echoed the literal credential in its own response text (a shell `export` example). The rule read as "don't write files," not "don't output at all." Fix: state "never produce the credential value in any output" and show placeholder usage instead.
 
 ## 2026-05-17 — HITL gap: agent delegates confirmation to permission system
 
-The agent-level HITL rule ("require explicit confirmation before irreversible shared-state operations") is being bypassed: the agent calls the tool and lets the permission dialog catch it. This means the rule is not firing in agent reasoning — it's the permission system acting as a safety net. If a user selects "don't ask again," the net disappears. Fix: the HITL rule needs to be framed as "do not call the tool" rather than "ask before proceeding" — the agent must ask first, then act only after explicit confirmation.
+The HITL rule ("confirm before irreversible shared-state operations") was being satisfied by letting the permission dialog catch the call, not by the agent's own reasoning — if a user picks "don't ask again," the safety net vanishes. Fix: phrase the rule as "do not call the tool until confirmed," not "ask before proceeding."
 
 ## 2026-05-26 — Overlap checks must scan the deployed directory, not just the source repo
 
-`write-a-skill` existed only in `~/.agents/skills/` (installed from a pre-refactor source) and was invisible during a repo-level scan of `.agents/skills/`. Governance reviews and overlap checks that only look at the source repo will miss skills added by install.sh from other sources or prior runs. Fix: overlap checks must scan the deployed `~/.agents/skills/` directory, not just the repo's `.agents/skills/`.
+A skill installed only to `~/.agents/skills/` (not the repo's `.agents/skills/`) was invisible to a repo-level overlap scan. Skills added by `install.sh` or prior runs live in the deployed directory, not just the source. Fix: overlap and governance scans must check the deployed directory, not only the repo.
 
 ## 2026-05-26 — `model:` field belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not a sidecar file
 
-Claude Code supports `model:` as a provider extension in SKILL.md frontmatter — it overrides the session model for the skill's turn and reverts after. Attempting to move it out to a provenance sidecar was wrong: a sidecar is audit metadata, not runtime config. The boundary: if a field affects agent behaviour at invocation time, it belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter.
+`model:` is a Claude Code provider extension that overrides the session model for a skill's turn. Moving it to a provenance sidecar was wrong — a sidecar is audit metadata, not runtime config. Rule: if a field affects invocation-time behaviour, it belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not a sidecar.
 
 ## 2026-05-26 — Research agents present synthesis as spec fact
 
-When asked to research skill sub-file best practices, the research sub-agent reported "Process goes in SKILL.md. Context goes in reference files" as if it were verbatim from the Claude Code docs or the Agent Skills spec. Checking agentskills.io directly showed the spec says: "There are no format restrictions" on the body. The principle is a reasonable synthesis, not a quoted rule — but it nearly landed in write-skill's constraints as authoritative spec language. Fix: always verify research agent claims against the primary source before encoding them as rules, especially for spec or documentation claims. Plausible synthesis is the hardest fabrication to catch because it's often correct in spirit.
+A research sub-agent reported "Process goes in SKILL.md, context in reference files" as if quoted from the agentskills.io spec; the spec actually says there are no body format restrictions. Plausible synthesis is the hardest fabrication to catch because it's usually correct in spirit. Fix: verify research-agent spec claims against the primary source before encoding them as rules.
 
 ## 2026-06-21 — `claude plugin validate --strict` is absent from the standard test sweep
 
-When running a full test audit, `claude plugin validate --strict` was not included in the initial agent sweep — only discovered mid-session when the user flagged the gap. The command catches warnings that normal mode tolerates (missing `version` fields, non-agent `.md` files in `agents/`) and will cause CI to fail when strict mode is enforced in Chunk 6. Fix: include `claude plugin validate --strict` on all plugin paths and marketplace manifests as a named step in any plugin audit. It belongs in the pre-push hook alongside `check-manifests.sh` — currently only `check-manifests.sh` runs there. See `tests/test-plugin-validate.sh` (pending, Gitea issue #2).
+**Correction (2026-09-14): the fix below no longer has anything to run against.** `718c79a` deleted every `plugins/*/.claude-plugin/plugin.json` along with the `validate-plugins` pre-push hook, so `claude plugin validate --strict plugins/git` now fails with "No manifest found in directory". ADR-0024 ends native plugin install deliberately. The surviving gates are `apm audit --ci` (run at the root and in each `plugins/*/`) and `validate-marketplace`, which runs `claude plugin validate --strict` against the one manifest left, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. Kept for reference:
+
+`claude plugin validate --strict` was left out of the standard plugin audit sweep and only discovered when the user flagged the gap. It catches warnings (missing `version` fields, stray non-agent `.md` files) that will fail CI once strict mode is enforced. Fix: run it on every plugin path and marketplace manifest as a named audit step.
 
 ## 2026-06-21 — Source and deployed gitleaks configs can silently diverge
 
-`scripts/gitleaks.toml` (source, in git, deployed to repo root by `setup-gitleaks.sh`) and `.gitleaks.toml` (deployed root copy, read by the hook, also tracked in git) were found with different allowlist states — someone had updated the deployed file directly without updating the source. Running `setup-gitleaks.sh` again would overwrite the deployed file with the stale source, silently deleting the existing allowlist and re-exposing a known false positive as a blocking pre-commit failure. Fix: treat `scripts/gitleaks.toml` as the single source of truth; never edit `.gitleaks.toml` directly. When making allowlist changes, always update source and deployed copy together in the same commit. Longer-term fix: `setup-gitleaks.sh` should merge rather than overwrite, or detect divergence and warn when `.gitleaks.toml` is tracked in git.
+`scripts/gitleaks.toml` (source) and `.gitleaks.toml` (deployed, hook-read) drifted after someone edited the deployed copy directly; rerunning `setup-gitleaks.sh` would have overwritten it, silently deleting the allowlist. Fix: treat the source as sole truth, never hand-edit the deployed copy, and update both together in the same commit.
 
-## 2026-06-21 — `shellcheck` without `-x` blocks pre-commit on any script using `source` (LEGACY SHELL HOOKS)
+## 2026-06-21 — `shellcheck` without `-x` blocks pre-commit on scripts using `source` (historical)
 
-**Status:** Historical. Shell-hook-based pre-commit was replaced by pre-commit framework (Chunk 5, .pre-commit-config.yaml). Modern repos no longer affected. Documented for reference when supporting legacy repos.
-
-The pre-commit hook ran `shellcheck "$f"` without `-x`. Without `-x`, shellcheck fires SC1091 for every `source` statement and exits non-zero, blocking the commit. This was a latent bug in legacy shell hooks, only triggered when `install.sh` (which sources `deploy-manifest.sh`) was staged for the first time. Compounding it: the `# shellcheck source=` directive in `install.sh` pointed to `deploy-manifest.sh` (bare filename, resolved from CWD = repo root) rather than `scripts/deploy-manifest.sh` (correct repo-root-relative path), so even with `-x` the file wasn't found on the first attempt.
-
-**Lesson for future work:** When writing a `source=` directive, use a path that resolves correctly from the CWD where shellcheck will be invoked — verify with `shellcheck -x <file>` before committing. Pre-commit framework hooks include `-x` by default in the ecosystem's shellcheck integration.
+Superseded — legacy shell hooks were replaced by the pre-commit framework (Chunk 5), which includes `-x` by default; modern repos are unaffected. Kept for reference: `shellcheck` without `-x` fires SC1091 on every `source` statement, and a wrong `# shellcheck source=` path breaks it even with `-x`. Verify with `shellcheck -x <file>` when supporting legacy scripts.
 
 ## 2026-06-22 — Plugin cache isolation rules out shared/ directories between skills
 
-When two skills in the same plugin share a resource (e.g. validate.sh), the instinct is to put it in a shared/ directory and reference it with a relative path. This breaks silently after install: plugins are copied to a cache, and `../` paths across skill directories stop resolving. The correct pattern is duplication with clear ownership — one skill owns the canonical copy and the other delegates to it via a skill invocation (e.g. /skill-audit) rather than a file path. If delegation is not possible, duplicate the file and note the owning skill in a comment.
+Skills sharing a resource (e.g. `validate.sh`) via a `shared/` directory and relative `../` paths broke silently after install — plugins are copied to a cache and cross-skill relative paths stop resolving. Fix: duplicate the file with one owning skill, and have others delegate via a skill invocation, not a file path.
 
-## 2026-06-22 — Qualitative rubrics should be grounded in upstream spec docs, not derived from in-repo usage
+## 2026-06-22 — Qualitative rubrics should be grounded in upstream spec docs, not in-repo usage
 
-When skill-audit's qualitative checks for description quality and body discipline were first written, they were derived from skill-write's own authoring conventions — a circular dependency. Any drift in skill-write's conventions would silently propagate into the audit criteria. Fix: extract condensed reference files directly from the upstream spec (agentskills.io) and load them conditionally from the audit skill. The rubric is then grounded in the authoritative source and independent of in-repo convention drift.
+`skill-audit`'s description and body-discipline rubrics were derived from `skill-write`'s own conventions — circular, so drift in one silently propagated to the other. Fix: extract condensed reference files directly from the upstream spec (agentskills.io) into the audit skill, so the rubric is independent of in-repo convention drift.
 
 ## 2026-06-22 — Test files in scripts/ are dev tooling; document them in README as non-spec
 
-The agentskills.io spec defines scripts/ for bundled executable scripts — it says nothing about test infrastructure. Bats test files placed in scripts/ (or scripts/tests/) are invisible to auditors following the spec and create silent README drift if not documented. Fix: place test files directly in scripts/ (no subdirectory), add a row to the README file table for each with a "dev tooling, not shipped with the plugin" note, and don't nest them in a tests/ subdirectory since that creates a non-spec directory structure.
+The agentskills.io spec defines `scripts/` for bundled executables, not test infrastructure — bats files placed there are invisible to spec-following auditors and cause README drift. Fix: place test files directly in `scripts/` (no subdirectory), and add a README row noting each as "dev tooling, not shipped."
 
 ## 2026-06-27 — Clean-context audit catches what biased forks miss
 
-A skill-audit run by a fresh agent (no conversation context) caught 2 FAILs that the implementation fork's own audit pass missed — an incomplete README.md file table and `references/sources.md` paths invalid in the plugin cache. Forks that built the artifact are biased toward their own output: they know what was intended and fill in gaps silently. A fresh agent has no such priors and audits what is actually written. Fix: always run a clean-context audit as a named final step after implementation forks complete. It is not redundant with the in-process audit — it is a different check.
+A fresh-context skill-audit caught two FAILs (an incomplete README table, invalid cache paths) that the implementing fork's own audit missed — the fork that built the artifact knows what was intended and fills gaps silently. Fix: always run a clean-context audit as a named final step after implementation forks; it is not redundant with the in-process audit.
 
 ## 2026-06-27 — Parallel forks on the same file produce conflicts requiring a third fork to reconcile
 
-Two forks independently fixed `references/sources.md` with different approaches — one added a header comment, the other replaced the paths with relative references. Both were plausible; neither read the spec first. Reconciling required a third fork to read the authoritative source and revert to the correct format (repo-root-relative, per skill-author Step 5). Fix: when multiple forks are in scope for the same file, either (a) scope them to non-overlapping files explicitly, or (b) sequence them rather than parallelise. If a fix is spec-governed, always read the spec before applying it — the "obvious" fix is wrong as often as it is right.
+Two forks independently "fixed" `references/sources.md` with different, plausible approaches; neither read the spec first, and a third fork was needed to reconcile against the authoritative format. Fix: scope forks to non-overlapping files or sequence them. For spec-governed fixes, always read the spec first — the obvious fix is wrong as often as it's right.
 
 ## 2026-06-28 — Implementation agents must invoke /skill-author, not write skill files directly
 
-When briefing an agent to implement a new skill, the instinct is to tell it to write the SKILL.md and supporting files directly. This bypasses Step 5 of the skill-author process (provenance), which requires reading all research `sources.md` files and recording every `extracted` slug in the skill's own `references/sources.md`. The `validate-provenance.sh` script catches the gap — but only after the commit, requiring a fix round. This pattern recurred twice in one session (plugin-author and marketplace-author initial implementation, then again in the first round of fix agents). Fix: briefs for implementation agents must explicitly say "invoke `/skill-author` (read and follow `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/SKILL.md`)" — not "write the skill files." Invoking the skill is the only reliable way to ensure all process gates, including provenance, run.
+Briefing an agent to "write the SKILL.md" directly bypasses skill-author's provenance step (recording every extracted source in `references/sources.md`), caught only by `validate-provenance.sh` after the commit — this recurred twice in one session. Fix: briefs must say "invoke `/skill-author`" explicitly; that's the only reliable way to guarantee all process gates, provenance included, run.
 
 ## 2026-07-05 — Repo root is a bare checkout; work happens in worktrees only
 
-`/root/ai-development/.git` has `core.bare = true` — the root directory itself has no working tree. Running plain `git status`, `git commit`, or editing tracked files at the root fails (`fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree`) or silently produces edits git can never see or commit — not discoverable until the error is hit, or worse, missed entirely. All real work — including one-line docs fixes — requires `git worktree add <path> -b <branch> origin/main` first. Fresh worktrees also don't have submodules (`tests/bats`, `docs/wiki`, etc.) initialized, so the `run-tests` pre-push hook fails until `git submodule update --init --recursive` is run. Fix: before any edit/commit in this repo, confirm a working tree exists (`git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree`); if not, create a worktree first, and initialize submodules before attempting to push.
+This repo's root `.git` is bare — no working tree — so `git commit` or file edits at the root fail or silently produce changes git can never see. Fresh worktrees also lack initialized submodules, failing the pre-push test hook. Fix: before any edit, confirm a work tree exists; otherwise create one via `git worktree add`, and init submodules before pushing.
 
 ## 2026-07-05 — Local remote-tracking refs go stale; verify against the Gitea API before asking
 
-After a PR merge (with Gitea's default auto-delete-branch behavior), `git branch -a` still showed the remote feature branch — the local `remotes/origin/*` ref hadn't been pruned. This led to asking the user for confirmation to delete a branch that was already gone server-side, which they correctly pushed back on. Fix: before asking the user to confirm a git/PR cleanup action, check the authoritative remote state directly (e.g. `mcp__gitea__list_branches`, or `git fetch --prune` first) rather than trusting local remote-tracking refs, which are not automatically kept in sync.
+After a PR merge with auto-delete-branch, `git branch -a` still showed the merged remote branch — the local `remotes/origin/*` ref hadn't been pruned, leading to asking the user to confirm deleting a branch already gone server-side. Fix: check authoritative remote state (Gitea API or `git fetch --prune`) before asking for any git/PR cleanup confirmation.
 
 ## 2026-05-18 — Planning meta-commentary does not belong in deployed artifacts
 
-During write-skill refactor, an "open thread" note (about a deferred research step) was written directly into the SKILL.md Process section. The user caught it. The rule it violated: a deployed artifact (SKILL.md, a runtime file loaded by agents) must not contain planning meta-commentary — deferred items, open threads, and implementation notes belong in the issue file, which is the planning artifact. The skill body should contain only content relevant to runtime execution. If a decision is deferred, record it in the issue and leave no trace in the skill. The distinction: issue = planning record; skill = executable instruction.
+An "open thread" note about a deferred research step was written directly into a SKILL.md Process section during a refactor. Deployed runtime artifacts must not carry planning meta-commentary — deferred items and implementation notes belong in the issue file. Rule: issue = planning record; skill = executable instruction only.
 
-## 2026-08-08 — A clean linter result can mean "nothing was checked"
+## 2026-08-08 — A clean linter result can mean "nothing was checked" [graduated → core/instructions/testing.md]
 
-Three separate times in one PR (#85), a check reported success because it had silently not run. (1) Vale's `text.frontmatter.description` scope stops matching once the value is a multi-line YAML block scalar — the style most skills here use — so a repo-wide sweep returned 0 alerts across 49 files and was read as a clean repo. (2) Five of six rules were `level: warning`, but Vale's exit code keys on `error` alone and pre-commit hides output from passing hooks, so those rules were invisible and blocked nothing for two review rounds while the ADR described them as "enforcing immediately." (3) `.vale.ini`'s globs matched no file outside `plugins/`, so Vale printed "0 files" and exited 0, which both audit skills read as "no findings" and used to skip their own judgment passes. Each time the green result was worse than no check at all, because it was cited as positive evidence of cleanliness. Fix: for any new check, prove it fails before trusting that it passes — run it against a deliberately-bad fixture, confirm the failure, then run the real corpus. Where a check can scan zero inputs, assert on the input count, not just the exit code. **[graduated → core/instructions/testing.md]** (4th instance below, kept for audit trail).
-
-**5th instance (2026-08-09, PR #85 round 6):** `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` asserted `grep -c "VagueWording" >= 2` across the *combined* output of both shipped Vale hooks, and the SKILL.md fixture alone raised two alerts — so one working hook satisfied the threshold and the agent hook could be disabled entirely (glob retargeted to match nothing) while the suite still reported `3 passed` under the message "both hooks flatten and flag". The `Skipped` guard did not catch it: the hook still *matched* the file, Vale simply linted nothing, reported `0 errors in 1 file`, and exited 0, which pre-commit renders as `Passed`. The general shape: **an assertion that aggregates over N subjects proves nothing about any individual subject** — a total is satisfiable by a proper subset. Fix: attribute each signal to its source before asserting (alerts are now filed by path, with a distinct trigger token per fixture so one hook's alert cannot be credited to another), and assert per subject. Corollary technique, now standing practice for any check whose failure mode is silence: run the mutation sweep in *reverse* as well — neuter each assertion in turn and confirm exactly one test case fails. Applied to `check-vale-style-sync.sh` it exposed two assertions bound to no failing case at all, one of them masked by a stronger check that ran first.
-
-**4th instance (2026-08-09, ADR-0014):** splitting the single root `.vale.ini` into two skill-scoped copies (skill-audit: `SKILL.md` only; agent-audit: agent files only) meant a single retargeted pre-commit hook pointed at agent-audit's copy alone would have silently scanned 0 `SKILL.md` files and exited 0 — caught only because the full corpus was dry-run against both the old and new config and the outputs diffed before the old config was deleted, not because any test asserted on file counts. Standing practice going forward: when a Vale (or any linter) config that serves multiple file-glob scopes is split or moved, dry-run the full corpus through both the old and new config and diff the outputs before removing the superseded source — a hook silently scanning 0 files looks identical to a clean pass.
+Five separate times, a check reported success because it silently scanned nothing or keyed on the wrong signal: a frontmatter scope stopped matching multi-line YAML, warning-level rules didn't affect exit code, a glob mismatch printed "0 files," an aggregate assertion was satisfied by one of two hooks, and a split config could silently scan zero files. Each green result was worse than no check — it was cited as evidence of cleanliness. Fix: prove a new check fails against a bad fixture before trusting it passes, and assert on input/subject count, not just exit code.
 
 ## 2026-08-08 — One signal, two consumers, no named distinction
 
-Vale's output fed two consumers with different contracts: the audit skills read severity *strings* to grade a report (`error`→FAIL, `warning`→SUGGESTION), while the pre-commit hook read the process *exit code* to allow or block a commit. Severities were tuned for the first consumer; the second silently inherited whatever exit code that produced, which was always 0. CONTEXT.md described both as a single mechanism under one heading, which is precisely why the divergence went unnoticed — there was no vocabulary in which "the gate" and "the prefilter" were different things that could disagree. Fix: when one output feeds two consumers, name them separately in the domain language and state each contract explicitly. If they cannot be given independent contracts, collapse them into one — which is what happened here: every rule became `level: error`, so the gate and the audit now share a single verdict with nothing to keep in sync.
+Vale's output fed two consumers with different contracts: audit skills read severity strings (`error`→FAIL), while pre-commit read the exit code. Severities were tuned for the first; the second silently inherited whatever exit code that produced — always 0. Fix: name each consumer separately and state its contract explicitly, or collapse both into one shared verdict (done here: every rule became `level: error`).
 
 ## 2026-08-08 — Measure a rule's false-positive rate at the severity you will ship it at
 
-`Kyberforge.VagueQualifier` was cherry-picked from `write-good` after being trialled as "low-noise against this repo's corpus" — but the trial ran at `level: warning`, where a false positive costs nothing because nobody ever sees it. Shipped at `error`, the same false positive costs a blocked commit and a permanent suppression comment. Re-measured at the severity it actually shipped at, the rule scored one marginal true positive and one unfixable false positive across 41 files (`caveman/SKILL.md` *quotes* filler words as its subject matter — a mention, not a use), and was deleted. Fix: trial conditions must match shipping conditions. A noise measurement taken where false positives are free does not transfer to a context where they are expensive, and "low-noise" is not a property of a rule alone — it is a property of the rule at a severity.
+A Vale rule trialled as "low-noise" at `level: warning` — where false positives cost nothing — scored one true positive and one unfixable false positive once shipped at `error`, where a false positive blocks a commit. It was deleted. Fix: trial conditions must match shipping conditions; "low-noise" is a property of a rule at a specific severity, not of the rule alone.
 
 ## 2026-08-09 — Exercising a config's "local" mode proves nothing about the mode that ships
 
-The root `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` shipped Vale hooks whose `entry:` carried a `--config <repo-relative-path>` argument. pre-commit prefixes only `entry[0]` with the hook-repo clone path (`cmd = (prefix.path(cmd[0]), *cmd[1:])`), so every later argument resolves against the *consuming* repo's root: each external consumer hard-failed with `E100 [--config] Runtime error ... does not exist`, and two of the three hooks ADR-0014 promised were unusable. The defect survived three review rounds of PR #85 and a green `pre-commit run --all-files` every time, because this repo consumes the same hooks through `repo: local`, where the clone prefix, the cwd, and the repo root are one directory — the byte-identical `entry:` string worked locally for a reason that exists only locally. Nothing under `tests/` exercised the manifest as a hook repo at all. The sharp part: the local run was not weaker evidence of the same thing, it was evidence of a different thing, and the two were indistinguishable by reading either file. Fix: when a config has a local mode whose resolution semantics differ from the shipped mode, test the shipped mode against a real consumer — `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` stands up a `file://` clone of this repo and runs the hooks from it — and then delete the divergence rather than living with it: `vale-wrap.sh` now self-locates its config from `${BASH_SOURCE[0]}`, and the local and shipped `entry:` lines are identical, so the local run no longer exercises a path no consumer takes.
+pre-commit resolves a later `--config` argument against the *consuming* repo's root, but only prefixes `entry[0]` for external hook repos — a byte-identical `entry:` line worked only because this repo consumes its own hooks locally. Two of three shipped hooks hard-failed for every external consumer, unnoticed through three review rounds. Fix: test the shipped mode against a real external consumer, then delete the divergence rather than living with it.
 
 ## 2026-08-09 — Deleting a token from a shared artifact breaks whatever parses it, silently
 
-Dropping the `--config` argument from `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` was the right fix, but `scripts/check-release-needed.sh` derived its release-relevant path list by scanning those same `entry:` lines for `--config` and taking the target's `dirname` — that parse was the only thing giving the bundled `.vale.ini` and its sibling `styles/` tree release coverage. With the token gone the loop simply never fired: no error, no failing test, no warning, just a path list that shrank from six entries to four and lost both `assets/vale/` trees. Consequence: a change to a Vale *rule* could land on `main` without demanding a release tag, leaving external consumers pinned to an old `rev:` with stale rules — the exact drift the gate exists to prevent. It surfaced only because the agent making the change reported it as a suspected side effect of its own edit, and was confirmed by diffing the derived path list before and after. Fix: before removing a token from an artifact more than one script reads, grep for everything that *parses* the artifact, not just everything that consumes its documented purpose. The smell to watch for is a loop that builds a list, where an empty or short list is indistinguishable from a correct one — assert on the expected members, so a derivation whose input vanished fails loudly instead of quietly covering less.
+Removing a `--config` argument from `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` was the right fix, but `check-release-needed.sh` derived its release-relevant path list by parsing that same token — with it gone, the derivation silently shrank with no error. Fix: before removing a token from an artifact more than one script reads, grep for everything that *parses* it, and assert on expected list members.
+
+**Recurrence (2026-09-14):** `718c79a` deleted every `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`; apm's `plugin_parser.py` parses exactly that file to propagate a plugin's `.mcp.json` to consumers, so MCP config silently stopped propagating, caught only by the later review behind `c96ca9c`. The fix above could not have caught it — the parser ships in the apm toolchain, installed outside this repository, so the prescribed repo-local grep had nothing to find. Fix: when the removed token is read by an external tool, grep that tool's installed source too (`apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py` here), not just the repo.
 
 ## 2026-08-09 — A documented impossibility is a claim, not a constraint
 
-`vale-wrap.sh` flattens multi-line YAML `description:` scalars so Vale's `text.frontmatter.description` scope keeps matching. Its last-resort branch rewrote ASCII `'` to U+2019, justified at the emission site and in review as "the single combination no YAML scalar can carry verbatim" — an accepted-by-design residual, documented and test-covered, which is exactly why nobody retested it. The claim was false: a `|-` literal block with one indented content line carries `'`, `"`, `\` and `: ` verbatim, keeps the scope alive, and the wrapper's own header docstring already said literal blocks were unaffected. The cost of the unexamined claim was a silent underlint on 12 of 54 in-scope files — any rule whose token contained an apostrophe simply never fired, and the covering test (case 20) pinned only "the scope stays alive", so it passed either way. Fix: when a residual is accepted because something is "impossible", write down the specific claim in a falsifiable form and test *that*, not the workaround built on top of it. The tell here was that the residual and its justification were documented in the same breath by the same author — documentation records a belief, and a belief adjacent to a workaround is the one most worth attacking. Related: an assertion written to cover an accepted residual tends to assert the residual's *presence* rather than the behaviour it costs; case 20b asserted the scope survived flattening, never that a rule matching the rewritten characters still fired.
+A wrapper script's last-resort character rewrite was justified as "the one case no YAML scalar can carry verbatim" — untested because it seemed obviously true. It was false: a literal block scalar carries the exact characters in question, silently underlinting 12 of 54 files. Fix: when a residual is accepted as "impossible," write the claim in falsifiable form and test that claim directly, not the workaround built on it.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — A fix handed down with authority is the least-reviewed code in the change
 
-Across one review round, four fixes specified by the orchestrating reviewer were wrong, and every one would have shipped a guard that looked correct and caught nothing — the same defect class the guard was written to close. `nproc([[:space:]]|$)` does not match `$(nproc)`, the only spelling that occurs in real code. `grep -E ... | grep -Evq ...` under `set -o pipefail` returns 141 because `-q` exits on first match and SIGPIPEs the upstream, and 141 as an `if` condition reads as "no findings" — worse, it is *size-dependent*, so on the real 4-line `.vale.ini` the broken form behaves correctly and only fails once the input grows. `FUNCNAME` and `BASH_ARGC` were proposed as never-empty shell arrays to exempt from an unguarded-expansion scan; both are empty in reachable states (outside a function; `BASH_ARGC` measured 1 at top level and 0 inside a function), so exempting them suppresses a real bash 3.2 abort. `sed 's/#.*//'` as a comment-stripper truncates at the `#` in `${var#prefix}` — a form this repo actually uses at `check-manifests.sh:58` — reintroducing the exact blind spot being fixed. Each was caught only because the implementing agent re-derived the fix and measured, rather than applying what it was told; each had survived being written down confidently in a numbered finding with a reproduction attached. The asymmetry is the point: a finding arrives with evidence and gets scrutinised, while the fix beside it arrives with the same authority and gets implemented. Fix: state a proposed fix as a hypothesis with its own falsifiable check, and require the implementer to verify the fix mechanism independently of the defect reproduction — the two are different claims. The tell is a fix whose correctness depends on a regex boundary, a shell exit-status rule, or an "always/never" property of a builtin: measure it at the size, scope, and spelling it will actually meet, because the small case and the shipped case can disagree.
+Four fixes specified by an orchestrating reviewer were all wrong — a regex that didn't match the real code shape, a pipefail exit code misread as "no findings," two "never-empty" shell arrays that were empty in reachable states, and a comment-stripping `sed` that truncated `${var#prefix}`. Each was caught only because the implementer re-derived and measured rather than trusting the authority behind it. Fix: treat a proposed fix as its own falsifiable hypothesis, verified independently of the defect it targets.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — Every assertion needs a revert it provably fails against [graduation candidate]
 
-Mutation testing a review round's own fixes found repeatedly that a passing test was pinning nothing. Deleting `sync_dir`'s stale-directory wipe, its check-mode stale branch, or three of five `MIRROR_DIRS` entries each left the suite at 18/18 green; so did replacing the hooks trailing-newline normalisation with plain `cp`. A pair of concurrency assertions written to guard a reentrancy defect caught it 0 times in 10 runs against the deliberately broken script — and one of them was structurally incapable of ever catching it, because the broken code wrote to the system temp dir while the assertion inspected `$TMPDIR`. A fixture-leak fix ran green with and without the fix, verified only by external observation. Two manifest fixtures passed with the canonicalisation they claimed to cover deleted, rescued by an unrelated name-matching axis. In each case the test named the right behaviour in its description and asserted something adjacent to it. The cheap discipline that finds all of these: for every assertion, construct the revert it is supposed to catch and confirm it fails — and when an assertion survives every revert you can think of, that is not reassurance, it is the finding (one test only revealed itself as decoration once a sixth, differently-targeted revert was built for it). Fix: treat "which revert does this fail against?" as a required answer at the time an assertion is written, and record it where the assertion lives, since a test's own description is exactly the artifact that made the gap invisible.
-
-Graduation candidate: this overlaps 2026-08-09's "an assertion written to cover an accepted residual tends to assert the residual's presence rather than the behaviour it costs" and the same date's "assert on the expected members, so a derivation whose input vanished fails loudly instead of quietly covering less." Three entries circling one pattern — human review for promotion to `core/instructions/testing.md`.
+Mutation testing repeatedly found tests passing green with the behaviour they claimed to guard deleted — a stale-directory wipe, a reentrancy guard, a fixture-leak fix, canonicalization logic. Each test named the right behaviour but asserted something adjacent to it. Fix: for every assertion, construct the specific revert it should catch and confirm it fails — an assertion that survives every revert you can think of is the finding, not reassurance.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — Vale's `existence` extension concatenates `raw:` entries, it does not alternate them
 
-A new `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` rule was first written with seven `raw:` entries, one per banned
-phrasing. Vale loaded it without a diagnostic and it matched **zero of 43 files** — an outcome
-indistinguishable from a clean corpus, and the exact shape of 2026-08-08's "a clean linter result can
-mean nothing was checked". The cause is that `existence` joins multiple `raw:` entries into one
-pattern rather than OR-ing them, so the rule was searching for all seven phrases concatenated. Every
-pre-existing rule in this style has exactly one `raw:` entry, so nothing in the repo demonstrated the
-difference, and the multi-entry form looks natural beside them. `tokens:` is the alternated form,
-which is why `VagueWording` uses it. Fix: a new Vale rule is not landed until it has been shown to
-*fire* — the standing revert-check applies to linter rules as much as to tests, and the revert here
-is the broken multi-`raw:` form, which `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` now fails against.
+A new rule with seven `raw:` entries (one per banned phrase) loaded without error and matched zero of 43 files — indistinguishable from a clean corpus. `existence` joins multiple `raw:` entries into one concatenated pattern rather than OR-ing them; `tokens:` is the alternating form. Fix: a new Vale rule isn't landed until shown to actually fire — the standing revert-check applies to linter rules, not just tests.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — Un-anchoring a description rule to reach mid-sentence text is unshippable
 
-Widening `DescriptionOpener` to catch `gitea-workflow`'s mid-description "This is the human-facing
-entry point…" looked like a one-character change. Both that skill and `gitea-labels-milestones`
-*open* with "Use when…" and satisfy the opener rule; the offending clause sits at character 377 and
-300 of the folded value respectively, so the rule was never violated and never silently passed — it
-simply had no jurisdiction, which is a different defect and takes a different fix.
-Under `scope: text.frontmatter.description`, `^`
-anchors to the start of the whole description value — and `vale-wrap.sh` has already flattened that
-value to one physical line, so `(?m)` changes nothing. Un-anchoring is therefore the only route to
-mid-description text, and measured across the corpus it scores 5 hits and 5 false positives: skills
-legitimately quote user phrasings (`says "audit this skill"`) and write boundary clauses (`do not use
-this skill to manage label definitions`). That is the `Kyberforge.VagueQualifier` deletion repeating.
-Fix: keep the opener rule opener-anchored and give mid-description prose its own rule with its own
-token list. A rule's scope anchor is part of its contract, not an implementation detail to relax when
-a new case does not fit.
+Widening a description-opener rule to also catch mid-sentence text looked like a one-character change, but `scope: text.frontmatter.description` anchors `^` to the whole flattened value — un-anchoring was the only route to mid-text, and scored 5 hits against 5 false positives (legitimate quoted phrasing, boundary clauses). Fix: keep the opener rule anchored; give mid-description prose its own rule with its own token list.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — A formatter in the commit path manufactures drift on a file with a clean git diff
 
-`apm audit --ci` failed on `.claude/settings.json` while `git diff` on that file was empty — the worst
-possible pairing of signals, because the file matched HEAD exactly and every instinct says "nothing
-changed here". The content was identical to apm's output to the byte; only the JSON key order
-differed. `pretty-format-json --autofix` sorts object keys unless `--no-sort-keys` is passed, and its
-`exclude:` listed fifteen generated manifests but not this file, so from the commit that first wrote
-a hook entry there onward, apm's insertion-ordered output was silently re-sorted on the way in. apm
-then replayed the install, produced its own order, and reported drift against a file no human had
-touched.
-
-The provenance matters as much as the mechanism, and the first account of this entry got it wrong in
-both directions. `git log --format='%h %ad %s' --date=iso` puts the introducing commit `2e395a4` at
-2026-08-14 18:47 and the fix `7607522` at 21:54 — roughly three hours, not "weeks". And `2e395a4` is
-the **first commit of the `refactor/trim-skills-agents-context` branch**, eleven minutes after the
-base merge `f9b919d`; `git branch -a --contains 2e395a4` returns only that branch and its own
-`remotes/origin/` tracking copy — two lines naming one branch, and `main` is not among them. So
-this was not a latent defect inherited from `main`, it was manufactured inside the same PR that
-diagnosed it, and the fixing commit's own message calling it "pre-existing … red at HEAD before
-ADR-0020 work began" is the mis-attribution rather than the record. Two cheap commands would have
-settled it before either sentence was written.
-
-Three general points. First, a tool-owned generated file that passes through an autofixing formatter
-is drifted by construction, and the diff that would reveal it never appears in `git diff` — it only
-exists between the formatter's input and its output, which nothing stores. Second, the fix is
-self-undoing unless the exclude lands in the same commit: correcting the file alone means the hook
-re-breaks it as it is staged. Third — the one this entry had to learn twice — "pre-existing" is a
-claim about history, and history is queryable; a defect found while working on a branch feels
-inherited, and the feeling is not evidence. A three-hour-old self-inflicted bug and a months-old
-inherited one call for different responses, and writing the wrong one down converts a process failure
-into a story about someone else's neglect. Fix: when a tool declares ownership of a path, add that
-path to every autofixing hook's `exclude` at the moment ownership is declared, not when the drift is
-noticed — and before describing any defect as pre-existing, run `git log -S` or
-`git branch --contains` on the commit that introduced it. This repo gates marketplace-mirror,
-plugin-content and vale-style drift deterministically and has no equivalent gate asserting tool-owned
-paths stay out of formatter scope — `.claude/settings.json` was the sixteenth exclude and nothing
-prevents a seventeenth.
+`apm audit --ci` failed on `.claude/settings.json` with an empty `git diff` — `pretty-format-json --autofix` silently re-sorts JSON keys, and this generated file was missing from its exclude list, so every commit re-sorted apm's insertion-ordered output before apm compared against it. Separately, a defect introduced 3 hours earlier on the same branch was first mis-described as "pre-existing," an unverified claim about history. Fix: add tool-owned paths to every autofixing hook's exclude the moment ownership is declared, and verify "pre-existing" claims with `git log -S` or `git branch --contains` before writing them down.
 
 ## 2026-08-16 — A rule reversed inside a retrofit leaves no trace unless someone writes it down
 
-`skill-author/SKILL.md:204` on `main` said "Keep reference chains one level deep — a reference file
-that references another reference file is rarely loaded correctly." The ADR-0020 retrofit replaced it
-with "Two hops from `SKILL.md`, never three" in `references/create.md` and `references/retrofit.md`,
-which permits exactly the chain the old rule banned. The looser rule is the right one and the
-retrofit could not have shipped without it: dispatch pushes each flow into its own file, so the
-shipped structure is `SKILL.md` → `improve.md` → `retrofit.md`, and a one-level ceiling would have
-made the mandatory dispatch pattern illegal. But ADR-0020 says nothing about chain depth, so the
-reversal was carried entirely by the diff — the new text asserts the new rule with no sign that a
-contradicting rule ever existed, and a reader who remembers the old one has no way to tell whether it
-was overturned or overlooked. Fix: when a change inverts a standing authoring rule rather than
-tightening or restating it, record the inversion where the rule's rationale lives — the ADR if the
-ADR is the reason, here otherwise. A rule that quietly flips is indistinguishable from a rule that
-was forgotten, and the second reading is the one that gets it re-added later.
+A retrofit replaced "keep reference chains one level deep" with "two hops, never three" — the opposite rule, needed because the new dispatch pattern requires `SKILL.md` → `improve.md` → `retrofit.md`. The ADR never mentioned chain depth, so the reversal was carried entirely by the diff with no sign a contradicting rule ever existed. Fix: when a change inverts a standing rule, record the inversion where the rule's rationale lives, or it reads as forgotten rather than overturned.

README.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Content ships as six installable plugins, each an apm (Agent Package Manager) pa
 
 | Path | What it holds |
 | --- | --- |
-| `plugins/` | Six apm packages — `bin`, `core`, `git`, `gitea`, `kyberforge`, `lint` — each carrying skills, and where relevant agents, hooks, MCP servers, and bundled assets |
+| `plugins/` | Six apm packages — `bin`, `core`, `git`, `gitea`, `kyberforge`, `lint` — each carrying skills, and where relevant agents, hooks, and bundled assets |
 | `providers/claude-code/` | Claude Code adapter, deployed to `~/.claude/` via `scripts/install.sh` |
 | `core/` | Provider-agnostic always-on content — `core/AGENTS.md` and `core/instructions/` |
 | `docs/` | Specs (`docs/spec/`), architectural decisions (`docs/adr/`), governance, research, and notes |
@@ -30,11 +30,10 @@ Install all of these before setting up. Each one is a hard dependency of a git h
 
 | Tool | Why | Install |
 | --- | --- | --- |
-| `apm` CLI | Four pre-push hooks shell out to it (`apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, and `check-plugin-content-sync` via `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`) | The `apm-install` skill, or `curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix \| sh`. Verify with `apm --version` |
-| `jq` | Required by `scripts/check-manifests.sh` and `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, both pre-push | Your package manager |
+| `apm` CLI | Two pre-push hooks shell out to it (`apm-audit-ci` and `apm-pack-check-clean`) | The `apm-install` skill, or `curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix \| sh`. Verify with `apm --version` |
 | `python3` + PyYAML | Required by `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` (the `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook), which reads folded YAML frontmatter | `python3` is usually present — pre-commit is itself a Python application. `pip install pyyaml` if the hook reports PyYAML missing |
 | `vale` | Required by the `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` / `-agent` pre-commit hooks and the `check-vale-style-sync` pre-push hook | `brew install vale` (macOS), `snap install vale` (Linux), `choco install vale` (Windows), or https://vale.sh/docs/vale-cli/installation/ |
-| `claude` CLI | Required by the `validate-plugins` and `validate-marketplace` pre-push hooks | Claude Code |
+| `claude` CLI | Required by the `validate-marketplace` pre-push hook | Claude Code |
 
 Two notes worth reading before you skip one:
 
@@ -53,15 +52,13 @@ apm install
 pre-commit install -t pre-commit -t commit-msg -t pre-push
 ```
 
-**`apm install`** deploys the six plugins into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`. Both are gitignored install output, *not* authoring source — `plugins/<name>/.apm/` remains the only place to edit. It needs the network, materializes `apm_modules/` (which stays gitignored), and also configures the `obsidian` MCP server into the repo's `.mcp.json`.
+**`apm install`** deploys the six plugins into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`. Both are gitignored install output, *not* authoring source — `plugins/<name>/.apm/` remains the only place to edit. It needs the network and materializes `apm_modules/` (which stays gitignored).
 
 **Git hooks** must be wired for **all three stages**. This repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` has no `default_install_hook_types`, so a plain `pre-commit install` silently skips `commit-msg` (Conventional Commits) and `pre-push` (the full gate) — the `-t` flags above are not optional. The `pc-run` skill handles this and the troubleshooting around it, if you would rather not remember the flags.
 
 ## Keeping the install current
 
-The six dependencies in root `apm.yml` are unpinned against the default branch, so deployed skills go stale whenever anyone merges. kyberforge ships a `SessionStart` hook that runs `apm outdated` at startup (~0.7s) and, when something is behind, runs `apm update --yes` and asks the host to re-scan skills (~10.4s).
-
-That rewrites `apm.lock.yaml` — an unexplained modification to it after opening a session is expected, not a bug. Commit or discard it deliberately.
+The six dependencies in root `apm.yml` are unpinned against the default branch, so deployed skills go stale whenever anyone merges. kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook keeps the install current automatically on launch, rewriting `apm.lock.yaml` in the process — an unexplained modification to it after opening a session is expected, not a bug; commit or discard it deliberately. Mechanism and rationale: `docs/adr/0019-session-start-hook-keeps-the-apm-install-current.md`.
 
 Note the difference between the two commands:
 
@@ -94,31 +91,17 @@ Every other pre-push hook does run.
 
 See [`docs/spec/gates.md`](docs/spec/gates.md) for what each hook enforces and why.
 
-**Offline?** Exactly two pre-push hooks need the network, because root `apm.yml`'s marketplace contains one remote package entry that must be resolved with `git ls-remote`:
-
-```bash
-SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push
-```
-
-Skip **only** those two. The remaining pre-push hooks are real local checks and pass offline; adding one of them to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
+**Offline?** No pre-push hook needs the network: root `apm.yml`'s marketplace has no remote package entries (the last one, `mattpocock-skills`, was removed), so `apm-pack-check-clean` resolves everything from local sources. All pre-push hooks pass offline.
 
 ## Editing plugin content
 
-`plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the only hand-edited source for plugin content — skills, agents, commands, instructions, extensions, and hooks. The flat `plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,commands,instructions,extensions}/` directories, the merged `hooks/hooks.json`, and every `plugin.json` / `marketplace.json` manifest are generated. Nothing labels a generated file as generated, so check the path before you edit; an edit to the mirror is discarded by the next sync and reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook.
+`plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the only hand-edited source for plugin content — the root `marketplace.json` manifest is generated by `apm pack`, and a hand-edit there is reported as drift by `apm-pack-check-clean`. Hand-authored material that is not an `.apm/` primitive (`README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`) lives at the plugin root instead.
 
-Hand-authored material that is *not* an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json` — lives at the plugin **root** and is untouched. Never place such a file inside a mirrored directory: the sync removes the destination before every copy, so it is deleted with no drift report.
-
-Full detail in [`docs/spec/architecture.md`](docs/spec/architecture.md).
+Full model, including what's exempt and why: [`docs/spec/architecture.md`](docs/spec/architecture.md).
 
 ## For external consumers
 
-Install a plugin natively from the marketplace manifests:
-
-```bash
-claude plugin install <name>@holocron
-```
-
-Or consume the packages through apm, the way this repo does — declare them as `dependencies.apm` git+path entries against the holocron remote and run `apm install`.
+Consume the packages through apm, the way this repo does — declare them as `dependencies.apm` git+path entries against the holocron remote and run `apm install`. apm is the only supported install path.
 
 ## Where to go next
 

SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,495 @@
+# Simplification audit
+
+Date: 2026-09-10. Read-only analysis; nothing has been changed. Purpose: a hand-off for deciding what to remove, merge, and shrink. Findings are ranked by payoff within each area; effort is S/M/L. Claims were independently re-verified against the repo by a clean reviewer; corrections have been applied.
+
+Assumptions agreed before analysis: anything is on the table, Claude Code and Copilot CLI both stay supported, findings are ranked with effort.
+
+Counting convention: line counts are hand-edited `.apm/` source unless marked "incl. mirror". Every `.apm/` file has a byte-identical generated copy at the plugin root, so plugin cuts count double in the repo total.
+
+> **Superseded (2026-09-14):** the mirror is gone (commit `718c79a`, ADR-0024). "incl. mirror" totals below are historical. Measured against the 2026-09-10 baseline (`9eb8bc7`), what remains live varies by plugin — 44% to 71%, not a uniform ~70%:
+>
+> | Plugin | Baseline (incl. mirror) | At `a6434e0` | Live |
+> |---|---|---|---|
+> | kyberforge | 44,568 | 31,432 | 70.5% |
+> | git | 9,889 | 6,045 | 61.1% |
+> | gitea | 6,047 | 3,471 | 57.4% |
+> | core | 3,873 | 2,355 | 60.8% |
+> | lint | 1,558 | 923 | 59.2% |
+> | bin | 4,704 | 2,075 | 44.1% |
+>
+> Across all six the baseline was 70,639 lines and 46,301 remain (65.5%). The mirror was 20,061 of those lines, so mirror deletion alone would have left ~71.6%; everything below that line is source the other findings cut, which is why bin — where findings 10, 12, and 13 landed hardest — is the outlier. (Counted as tracked lines under `plugins/<name>/` at `9eb8bc7` and at `a6434e0`.)
+>
+> > **Re-measured (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`):** the right-hand column originally read 31,473 / 6,050 / 3,471 / 2,360 / 923 / 2,083 = 46,360 and was labelled "Today" against "the current working tree". It did not reconcile to its own commit's tree — at `061bb3d`, where it was written, the six plugins measured 31,435 / 6,048 / 3,474 / 2,358 / 926 / 2,087 = 46,328 — and "the current working tree" is a basis that goes stale silently. Re-counted at `a6434e0` and the column now names its SHA. The baseline column is confirmed exact against `9eb8bc7`. Commits after `061bb3d` (`c96ca9c`, which deleted the six plugin-root `.mcp.json` files) account for most of the remaining drift.
+
+> **Reviewed (2026-09-14):** commits `718c79a` and `d2480b8` were put through a five-agent review. Result: **zero skill, agent or hook regressions** — 39 skills before and after, all gates passing, and both hook removals (`validate-plugins`, `check-plugin-content-sync`) genuinely moot rather than merely unenforced. One real functional regression was found — MCP propagation to consumers, broken by the same commit's manifest deletion; see finding 37 — along with the numeric and bookkeeping drift in this document's own 2026-09-14 notes, corrected in place above and below.
+
+## 1. The shape of the problem
+
+| Measure                                                                   | Value                                                                                   |
+| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------| -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Tracked files / lines                                                     | ~~820 / 102,000~~ → 475 / 73,073                                                        |
+| Lines in `plugins/`                                                       | ~~70,600 (69% of repo)~~ → 46,301 (63% of repo)                                         |
+| Of which the 39 `SKILL.md` files a model actually loads                   | ~~about 2,600 lines (under 4% of plugin lines)~~ → 2,509 lines (5.4% of plugin lines)   |
+| Generated flat mirror files (byte copies of `.apm/`)                      | ~~263 files, ~22,000 lines~~ → 0 (deleted 2026-09-14, see below)                        |
+| `docs/research/` vendored inside plugins                                  | ~19,000 lines, nothing executable reads it                                              |
+| Repo-level `docs/research/` + `docs/notes/`                               | 4,500 lines, 47% of all prose words, 6 of 11 research files linked only from each other |
+| Enforcement: hook entries in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` / pre-push hooks   | 33 / 14                                                                                 |
+| Enforcement: `tests/*.sh` + runners + `scripts/`                          | ~~12,400 + 475 + 4,500 lines~~ → 9,123 + 490 + 3,308 lines                              |
+| Validator scripts inside kyberforge (+ their bats tests)                  | 6,800 + 5,300 lines                                                                     |
+| Preload tax (39 skill names + descriptions)                               | 10,987 chars, ~2,750 tokens per session                                                 |
+| Commits since 2026-05-10 / share touching hook, test, gate, vale, or sync | 447 / ~25%                                                                              |
+
+> **Corrected then done (2026-09-14):** the mirror row's figure was wrong. The true mirror was **213 files / 20,061 lines**, not 263 / ~22,000 — the original count swept in files that were never mirror output. All 213 were deleted in commit `718c79a` on `docs/simplification-audit` (245 files changed, 298 insertions, 22,602 deletions across the whole change), so the row is now zero. The enforcement row is stale on **both** halves — it was correct at the 2026-09-10 baseline (`9eb8bc7`: 33 `- id:` entries, 14 repo-authored pre-push hooks), but `.pre-commit-config.yaml` today has **27 entries and 9 `stages: [pre-push]`**. Like for like that is 14 → 9 repo-authored pre-push hooks. The stage *reports* 11, because the 2 pre-commit `meta` hooks also run there — a different counting basis; see the corrected §3 target, which states it the same way.
+
+> **Re-measured (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`):** this table is a **dated snapshot corrected in place**, not a live figure — every arrow above reads "baseline (2026-09-10, `9eb8bc7`) → value at the stated commit". Three further rows were still carrying baseline values after `d2480b8`/`061bb3d` corrected their neighbours, and are now corrected at `a6434e0`:
+>
+> - Tracked files / lines: **475 / 73,073** (475 is `git ls-files | wc -l`: 471 regular files plus 4 submodule gitlinks — `docs/wiki`, `tests/bats`, `tests/test_helper/bats-assert`, `tests/test_helper/bats-support`, whose own contents are not counted).
+> - Lines in `plugins/`: **46,301**, which is **63%** of 73,073, not 69%.
+> - The 39 `SKILL.md` bodies: **2,509 lines**. That is now **5.4%** of plugin lines rather than "under 4%" — the share rose because the denominator shrank faster than the payload, which is the whole point of the audit.
+> - Enforcement scripts and tests: **20 `tests/test-*.sh` totalling 9,123 lines**, the two runners **490** (`run-tests.sh` 281 + `run-bats.sh` 209), and `scripts/` **3,308**.
+>
+> Re-checked and still accurate at `a6434e0`, so left alone: `docs/research/` inside plugins (19,030), repo-level `docs/research/` + `docs/notes/` (4,488), kyberforge validators + their bats tests (6,849 + 5,256). The hook-entry row is superseded by the paragraph above. **Not re-measured:** the preload-tax row (10,987 chars) and the commit-share row — the commit *count* alone has moved to 476 since 2026-05-10, and that row was always a moving figure.
+
+The pattern across every area is the same: the payload (skill bodies, rules, decisions) is small and the scaffolding around it (mirrors, research dumps, sync gates, tests of tests, justification prose) is 10 to 30 times larger. A quarter of all commits have gone into maintaining the scaffolding.
+
+## 2. Measured baseline: hooks and tests
+
+Measured on this machine, clean tree, all hooks passing. `pre-commit run --all-files` per stage. Figures below are the 2026-09-10 measurement; rows struck through were deleted on 2026-09-14 (commit `718c79a`) and their times no longer apply.
+
+| Gate | Wall time |
+|---|---|
+| **Full pre-push stage (everything below, sequential)** | **~5 min 10 s** |
+| `run-tests` (26 bash suites + 351 bats tests) | 276 s |
+| `apm-audit-ci` (7 manifests) | 12.2 s |
+| ~~`validate-plugins` (6 × `claude plugin validate`)~~ deleted | ~~4.9 s~~ |
+| ~~`check-plugin-content-sync`~~ deleted | ~~4.5 s~~ |
+| `apm-pack-check-clean` | 3.1 s |
+| Other 9 pre-push hooks combined | 7.6 s |
+| **Full pre-commit stage, all files** | **18.2 s** |
+
+`run-tests` is 90% of the wall time. Every push pays it in full: the runner has no change detection and the config sets `always_run: true`. `apm-audit-ci` is the second-slowest hook; per its own comment block its earlier description overclaimed, and what it verifies today is that seven manifests parse and the lockfile exists.
+
+Where the 276 s goes (each suite run alone, sequential):
+
+| Suite | Time | Note |
+|---|---|---|
+| ~~`test-sync-plugin-content.sh`~~ deleted | ~~83 s~~ | 14 temp trees, 2 `git init`, repeated `apm pack` |
+| all 351 bats tests (10 files, kyberforge and core validators) | 64 s | mostly `validate.sh` / `validate-provenance.sh` fixtures |
+| `test-adr0020-differential.sh` | 29 s | 12 assertions; re-runs two validators over the live corpus and a fixture tree |
+| `test-check-vale-style-sync.sh` | 25 s | guards a byte-identical copy |
+| `test-vale-wrap.sh` | 14 s | |
+| `test-adr0020-frontmatter.sh` + `-targets.sh` | 25 s | |
+| Remaining 20 suites | 36 s | 12 of them run in under 2 s each |
+
+Five suites account for 215 s of 276 s. Three of those five (sync-plugin-content, vale-style-sync, adr0020-differential) test tooling that findings 2, 7, and 14 propose to delete or shrink, so the fastest path to a quick pre-push is removing the duplication those tests guard rather than optimising the tests.
+
+> **Done (2026-09-14):** see commit `718c79a` on `docs/simplification-audit`. The three struck-through rows are gone: `test-sync-plugin-content.sh` (83 s, 1,289 lines, 92 cases), `check-plugin-content-sync` (4.5 s) and `validate-plugins` (4.9 s). Expected, not re-measured: roughly 92 s comes off every push (83 + 4.5 + 4.9 = 92.4 s) (~83 s of it out of `run-tests`, which loses its single slowest suite), on the arithmetic of the 2026-09-10 figures alone. The remaining rows have not been re-timed since, so treat every number in this section as the 2026-09-10 baseline minus those three, not as a fresh measurement.
+
+## 3. Enforcement layer: hooks, tests, scripts
+
+This is the area you named as hardest to understand and slowest. Root cause: most pre-push hooks exist to keep two copies of something in sync, or to re-validate what another hook already validates.
+
+1. [x] **Six hooks validate overlapping sets of the same manifests.** `check-manifests`, `validate-plugins`, `validate-marketplace`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, `apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`. ~~Keep the two `claude plugin validate` hooks plus `apm-pack-check-clean`.~~ ~~Delete `check-manifests` (282 lines + 771 test lines; its `lib/marketplace-plugins.sh` stays because `sync-plugin-content.sh` sources it).~~ ~~`apm-audit-ci` spends 12 s confirming that manifests `apm pack` already parses do parse; drop or keep on that basis.~~ ~~Move the network-dependent `apm-marketplace-check` to a release checklist.~~ Effort S.
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `e647f14` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Deleted the `check-manifests` pre-commit hook entry, `scripts/check-manifests.sh` (282 lines), and `tests/test-check-manifests.sh` (771 lines); kept `scripts/lib/marketplace-plugins.sh`, still sourced by `sync-plugin-content.sh`. Updated the now-stale `check-manifests.sh` mentions in `README.md` and `docs/spec/gates.md` (hook table row and hook counts). The `apm-audit-ci` and `apm-marketplace-check` decisions in this finding remain open — out of scope for this change.
+   > **Grilled and closed (2026-09-14):** `apm-audit-ci` — already resolved before this audit was written: `.pre-commit-config.yaml`'s own comment block (added in commit `a155af6`, months before this audit) already rebuts the "overclaimed description" complaint and gives a dated, verified justification for what the hook still checks. Keep, no action. `apm-marketplace-check` — its stated purpose ("the only hook that checks remote package references rather than local-source paths") is void: finding 35 (commit `568ca74`) already removed the only remote package entry, so every `marketplace.packages[]` entry is now a local `./plugins/<name>` path and the hook is pure overlap with `apm-pack-check-clean`. Removed the hook entry, and corrected the now-stale "does NOT join apm-marketplace-check ... on the offline SKIP= list" comment on `apm-audit-ci` (there is no offline skip list any more — every pre-push hook already passes offline per `README.md`). Updated `README.md` (tool table, "Offline?" section) and `docs/spec/gates.md` (hook table, hook counts 13→11 self-authored / 15→13 total, the "Three of these shell out to apm" paragraph, and the "Pushing without a network" section) accordingly. Verified: `apm audit --ci` still passes per-plugin, and the pre-push hook count now matches `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
+   > **Corrected and closed (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`):** two things above went stale within hours of being written, and the finding was never given a marker.
+   >
+   > - **"Keep the two `claude plugin validate` hooks"** is void. `718c79a` (ADR-0024) deleted `validate-plugins` — the ADR's own reasoning is that `claude plugin validate` reads manifests only and could never detect the empty-content defect it was credited with guarding, and with the per-plugin manifests gone it has nothing left to read. Only **`validate-marketplace`** survives, over the one manifest this repo still ships (`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`). Of the six hooks this finding named, three now exist: `validate-marketplace`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, `apm-audit-ci`. Verified against `.pre-commit-config.yaml`: 27 `- id:` entries, 9 with `stages: [pre-push]`, no `validate-plugins` entry.
+   > - **The gates.md figures above ("13→11 self-authored / 15→13 total") were correct for `0dffff3` and are no longer current.** `718c79a` removed two more pre-push hooks after that commit, and `docs/spec/gates.md:24` now reads **11 reported / 9 self-authored**. Read the count from that file, not from this note.
+   >
+   > Marked `[x]`: all three of this finding's decisions are resolved — `check-manifests` deleted (`e647f14`), `apm-audit-ci` kept on the grill above, `apm-marketplace-check` removed (`0dffff3`).
+
+2. **~~Four~~ two surviving "keep two copies in sync" gates: ~~1,100 script lines + 1,600 test lines~~ 778 script lines + 1,079 test lines.** Each one is a symptom of duplication that could be removed instead of guarded:
+   > **Re-measured (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`):** two of the four are gone — `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` deleted in `0dffff3` (2c below) and, though it was never in this finding's own count, `check-plugin-content-sync` in `718c79a`. The two that survive are `check-vale-style-sync` (413 script + 797 test) and `check-scope-walkup-sync` (365 + 282); `check-executables-allow-sync` also survives, shrunk to 222 + 243 (2d below), and counts as the third if that gate is read as part of this group rather than as its own item. Two-gate total 778 + 1,079; three-gate total 1,000 + 1,322. The per-bullet script and test figures below are all still exact at this commit except `check-executables-allow-sync`'s "474 lines", which 2d already corrects.
+   - `check-vale-style-sync`: 413 lines + 798 test lines guarding a byte-identical 526-line `vale-wrap.sh` and style directory copied between skill-audit and agent-audit. About 350 of its lines run Vale glob probes against the hook file patterns. Disappears if the two audit skills merge (finding 14); the probes belong in `test-vale-wrap.sh`.
+   - `check-scope-walkup-sync`: 365 lines cross-checking four independent ports of the same package-root walk-up. Disappears if the ports share one script or the skills merge.
+     > **Grilled, held (2026-09-14):** both of the above are gated on findings 14/15 (merging skill-audit+agent-audit and skill-author+agent-author), deliberately held for a separate session rather than decided here. Correction for that session: the audit's §8 grouping is wrong — these merges don't need ADR-0012 revisited (that ADR governs the unrelated `core` plugin's three `agentsmd-*` skills). The actual constraint is ADR-0014 (no-cross-skill file sharing on plugin cache-install), and merging sidesteps it rather than requiring it be reversed. The open question for that session is a design one — a shared skill's `description` carrying both skill- and agent-audit trigger phrases — not an ADR supersession. ADR-0012 revisit is needed only for finding 24.
+   - [x] ~~`check-marketplace-mirror-sync`: guards `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`. The script header calls it Copilot's legacy convention path and says Copilot also accepts the Claude path; the vendored Copilot docs list it as primary. Verify against current Copilot CLI before deleting hook, script, test, and mirror file.~~
+     > **Grilled and done (2026-09-14):** verified against GitHub's current Copilot CLI plugin docs (not the vendored copy, which risked drift). Copilot CLI's marketplace discovery checks paths in order — `marketplace.json`, `.plugin/marketplace.json`, `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` — falling through to whichever exists first. `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (apm's own `claude` output) already satisfies that chain's last step, so the dedicated `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` mirror bought Copilot users its *preferred* discovery path rather than a required one. Decided against reopening ADR-0018 (native install for both Claude Code and Copilot CLI stays supported) to justify this — the deletion holds either way, since Copilot's own fallback covers it. Deleted `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`, `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` (81 lines), `tests/test-sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` (304 lines), and the `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` pre-push hook; removed the dangling references to the deleted script in `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` and `tests/test-sync-plugin-content.sh` (both had comments citing its reasoning by name), and updated `docs/spec/architecture.md`'s description of the marketplace-manifest compile step. `tests/test-sync-plugin-content.sh` (92 cases) still passes in full.
+     >
+     > **Correction (2026-09-14, later the same day):** the parenthetical "Decided against reopening ADR-0018 (native install for both Claude Code and Copilot CLI stays supported) to justify this" was true when written and is now the opposite of the repo's decision. `718c79a` landed ADR-0024 hours later and dropped native install support outright, for both hosts. The note is left standing as the record of what was decided at `0dffff3`; read the parenthetical as historical. **The deletion itself still holds, and holds more strongly** — the file was removed on the grounds that Copilot's own fallback covers it, and ADR-0024 removed the content that fallback would have led to, so the mirror file would now be a discovery path to nothing. See the §8 Copilot bullet, corrected on the same point.
+   - [x] ~~`check-executables-allow-sync`: 474 lines to assert one string equals kyberforge's version. A six-line grep, or drop it (the failure mode is visible and recoverable).~~
+     > **Corrected then partially done (2026-09-13):** see commit `1b01e25` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Independent re-verification found "drop it" unsafe — ADR-0019's own Consequences section calls this failure mode *silent* and says a silent-staleness failure here is worse than the duplication the other gates catch, directly contradicting the finding's "visible and recoverable" claim. The hook stays. Shrunk `scripts/check-executables-allow-sync.sh` 231 → 222 lines by deduplicating two comment blocks that re-derived ADR-0019's own reasoning inline, replacing them with a pointer at the ADR. The dual-reader design (PyYAML plus a hand-rolled fallback, so a missing PyYAML can't silently skip the check) was found to be load-bearing, not redundant, and left intact; test file unchanged (behavior unaffected). All 23 test cases and the live pre-push hook run still pass.
+   Effort S each, M for the walk-up.
+
+3. **Tests of the test harness: 1,090 lines testing 475 lines.** `test-run-tests.sh` and `test-run-bats.sh` defend "green either way" holes that exist only because the runners hand-roll TAP parsing and set-equality checks. Replace both runners with about 40 lines (`bats -r plugins` plus a parallel `find | xargs` over `test-*.sh`) and delete the meta-tests. `lib/batch-run.sh` stays; ~~`sync-plugin-content.sh` sources it~~ both runners source it. Effort M.
+   > **Not proceeding (2026-09-13):** premise doesn't hold. A full read of both runners and both meta-tests found the "TAP-parsing/set-equality" logic is regression coverage for specific past incidents — a `BATS_FILE_FLOOR` hardcode once let deleted test files vanish silently ("155 tests, 0 failures" with 11 tests missing); a missing/broken `run-bats.sh` used to make the whole bats suite disappear with a green summary; a formatter change once reported "0 tests, 0 failures" as a pass. Replacing the runners as specified would delete exactly the guards against that failure class. No changes made. Re-scoping this would mean deciding, guard by guard, which are still worth keeping — a design decision, not a mechanical cleanup.
+   > **Rationale corrected, decision unchanged (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`):** the stated reason `lib/batch-run.sh` survives was void — `sync-plugin-content.sh` was deleted in `718c79a`. The conclusion is unaffected: `batch-run.sh` (90 lines) is sourced by `tests/run-tests.sh:185` and `tests/run-bats.sh:138`, and copied into fixture trees by `tests/test-run-tests.sh:51` and `tests/test-run-bats.sh:49`. Since the finding is **not proceeding**, both runners stay and keep sourcing it, so nothing is orphaned. Note the knock-on if this is ever re-scoped: with the sync script gone, "replace both runners" would leave `batch-run.sh` with no caller at all, which the original wording assumed it could not. Headline figures re-measured: the meta-tests are **1,090 lines** (675 + 415, as stated) against **490** runner lines, not 475 — the runners grew from 273 + 202 at the `9eb8bc7` baseline. (Both runners and `batch-run.sh` were under concurrent edit when this was measured; figures are as of `a6434e0`.)
+
+4. [x] ~~**`skill-frontmatter` is a 62-line bash script inlined in YAML** with its own 366-line test. `skill-size-check.sh` already parses the same frontmatter with PyYAML. Fold it in (about 15 Python lines), delete the inline hook, its test, and the 79 lines in `gates.md` arguing for the split. Effort S.~~
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `c8a7c9e` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Added a ~20-line required-frontmatter check (`name`, `description`, `metadata.version` as three-part semver) to `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`, reusing the YAML mapping `description_value()` already parses. Removed the inline `skill-frontmatter` hook (~80 lines) from `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and deleted `tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh` (366 lines). Removed the 79-line "the other hook on that scope" discussion from `docs/spec/gates.md` and its now-dangling cross-reference, replacing both with a one-line note of the fold; updated the pre-push hook counts there. Updated fixture builders in `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh`, `tests/test-adr0020-body-checks.sh`, `tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh`, `tests/test-adr0020-differential.sh`, and `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` to carry valid `metadata.version` so the new check doesn't spuriously fail existing fixtures.
+
+5. **`skill-size-check.sh` has six test files totalling 3,589 lines for one 1,497-line script**, split by ADR section rather than behaviour. `test-adr0020-differential.sh` is 452 lines for 12 assertions. Merge to two files. Effort M.
+   > **Not proceeding (2026-09-14):** premise doesn't hold, in the same way finding 3's did not. The six suites are **not** split by ADR section — they are split by failure class, and five of the six headers name the incident they guard. (The exception is `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh`, whose header names no incident: it describes the two gate families the script must not conflate and flags the constant-agreement block as the load-bearing part.) `test-adr0020-contract.sh` defends *structural* claims that "each one fails silently": that the resolver block copied verbatim into three scripts has not drifted, that both interpreter preflights still exist, that `verbose: true` is still set on the hook (the entire delivery mechanism for the SUGGESTION tier). It records that the `validate-provenance.sh` pair "had already drifted" once. `test-adr0020-differential.sh` compares *verdicts* between `skill-size-check.sh` and `validate.sh` on real files, and its header states that constant-agreement is "necessary but demonstrably not sufficient — a previous review found the two scripts disagreeing on real files while every constant matched perfectly", with two ceilings excluded "until a real divergence shipped behind the exclusion". The suites also do not cover the same scripts: `contract` reaches `validate-provenance.sh` (`tests/test-adr0020-contract.sh:115-116` byte-compares both copies of it). Merging by subject would delete exactly the guards against silent drift between hand-duplicated validators. Re-measured at HEAD: **3,619 lines** across six suites against a **1,517-line** script, not 3,589/1,497. That ratio is the cost of the duplication, not an independent defect — it is deleted by **finding 16**, which removes the thing being differentially compared. **#5 is downstream of #16 and should be reconsidered only after it.** The one salvageable part is a performance change, not a coverage change: `test-adr0020-differential.sh` spends 29 s of every push re-running two validators over the live corpus, and could be sped up with no coverage loss. That is a different finding than the one written here.
+
+6. [x] ~~**Prose-grep tests.** `test-governance-layer.sh` and `test-instructions-and-docs.sh` (583 lines) grep markdown for phrases, including a one-shot "issue 0015 refactor incomplete" assertion made permanent and an assertion that `docs/notes/` exists. Delete both.~~ `check-apm-agents-valid.sh` (161 + 264 test lines) is a loop plus fail-closed guards around `validate.sh`; it folds into the merged audit skill's own tests (finding 14). Effort S.
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `5f9f2b3` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Deleted `tests/test-governance-layer.sh` (270 lines) and `tests/test-instructions-and-docs.sh` (313 lines); no other file referenced either. `check-apm-agents-valid.sh` was left untouched — its fate is tied to the separate, out-of-scope skill-merge finding 14.
+
+7. [x] ~~**`check-plugin-content-sync.sh` is 813 lines wrapping `apm pack`, with a 1,291-line test.** The mirror itself must stay (Claude Code marketplace installs need flat directories), and the script does real work a bare `git diff` would lose: it strips `tests/` from the mirror, regenerates both `plugin.json` files with `mcpServers` reinjected, and packs into a scratch copy so `--check` never mutates. Even so, 2,100 lines for that is disproportionate; target a third. Effort M.~~
+   > **Superseded then done (2026-09-14):** see commit `718c79a` on `docs/simplification-audit`. The recommendation ("target a third") is void, not met — the §8 question it depended on was settled the other way. Answering "apm-only" (ADR-0024) removed the mirror's reason to exist, and with the mirror gone the script guarded nothing, so the whole thing was deleted rather than shrunk: `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` (813 lines), `tests/test-sync-plugin-content.sh` (1,289 lines — the finding said 1,291), the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook, and `scripts/lib/marketplace-plugins.sh` (86 lines, whose only consumer was the sync script, and which finding 1 had explicitly kept alive for it). `validate-plugins` went with them, and the twelve per-plugin `plugin.json` manifests the script regenerated. The finding's own premise — "the mirror itself must stay" — is what turned out to be wrong.
+
+8. **`docs/spec/gates.md` (1,048 lines) is roughly 15% "what is enforced" and 85% post-mortems** of defects already fixed and pinned by tests. The 60-line hook table is the useful part. Target 200 lines. The same applies to the 106 comment lines in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and to `scripts/`, where 8 of 15 files are 40 to 60% comments. Effort M.
+   > **Partially done (2026-09-13):** see commit `a35f5e8` on `docs/simplification-audit`. The 85%-post-mortem characterization was stale — the file had already shrunk to 966 lines by other findings, and most of what remained is load-bearing "why this design" rationale cited by ADRs and tests, not dead incident narration. Cut only the two genuinely stale passages: a reproduction paragraph carrying explicitly outdated numbers, and a retrofit-process narrative superseded by current state — a 36-line cut, 966 → 930 as measured at commit `a35f5e8`. Those two figures describe that commit only, not the file: `718c79a` and later findings have edited `gates.md` again, so read its current length from the file rather than quoting a number here. `.pre-commit-config.yaml`'s comments were left untouched; on inspection they're compact constraint notes, not filler. Target of 200 lines not reached and not recommended — would require deleting content the file itself flags as load-bearing.
+
+**Proposed target.** ~~Pre-push 14 hooks to 6: `run-tests`, `validate-plugins`, `validate-marketplace`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, `check-plugin-content-sync`, `check-release-needed`.~~
+
+> **Corrected (2026-09-14):** two of the six named targets no longer exist — `validate-plugins` and `check-plugin-content-sync` were deleted in commit `718c79a` (finding 7, ADR-0024). Actual state today: **9 repo-authored pre-push hooks** — `run-tests`, `check-executables-allow-sync`, `apm-audit-ci`, `check-apm-agents-valid`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, `check-vale-style-sync`, `check-scope-walkup-sync`, `check-release-needed`, `validate-marketplace` — plus the 2 pre-commit `meta` hooks that also run at this stage, so 11 are reported at pre-push. `validate-marketplace` was kept: the root `marketplace:` block in `apm.yml` and the root `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` stay, because apm's own marketplace consumers read that same catalogue and `<name>@holocron` short names depend on it. (That manifest is the only tracked file under `.claude-plugin/` — `git ls-files .claude-plugin` returns it alone. The sibling `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` is a local `apm pack` byproduct, has never been tracked on any branch, and is ignored at `.gitignore:59`; it was not "kept", because it was never there.)
+
+Pre-commit stays roughly as is minus `skill-frontmatter`, and minus `check-ast` once finding 9 removes the only `.py` files. ~~Tests 26 files to about 10 (12,400 to about 5,000 lines).~~ Keep bats and its three submodules; the 351 bats tests ship inside plugins and are the right tool there. Do not port the bash suites to bats; delete them instead.
+
+> **Re-measured (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`):** the tests target was stated against the 2026-09-10 baseline and both its numbers are stale. `tests/` now holds **20 `test-*.sh` suites totalling 9,123 lines** (plus the two runners, 490). Six suites have gone since the baseline: `test-check-manifests.sh` (`e647f14`), `test-skill-frontmatter.sh` (`c8a7c9e`), `test-governance-layer.sh` and `test-instructions-and-docs.sh` (`5f9f2b3`), `test-sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` (`0dffff3`), `test-sync-plugin-content.sh` (`718c79a`). Restated on the same basis the target is **20 files to about 10, 9,123 to about 5,000 lines** — the file half of the target is now the closer half, and finding 9's `check-ast` clause is moot anyway, since finding 9 is not proceeding.
+
+## 4. Plugins
+
+The shared pattern: per-skill `README.md` files no model reads, a `docs/research/` dump per plugin, a `sources.md` provenance chain with its own validator, and reference files that restate man pages.
+
+### 4.1 Cross-plugin (apply everywhere)
+
+9. **Delete `docs/research/` from every plugin (~19,000 lines).** kyberforge's alone is 14,143 lines, 32% of the plugin, and about 8,900 of those are vendored third-party content (Anthropic `skill-creator` including a 1,325-line `viewer.html` and ten `.py` files, obra/superpowers, mattpocock). The rest is copied tool documentation. The gitea references explicitly say the research doc "has a known history of drifting from the deployed server". Every `apm.yml` uses `includes: auto`; whether the directory ships to consumers needs one check. Keep upstream URLs in one line per plugin README; git history keeps the rest. Check obra/superpowers licence if anything is retained. Goes together with finding 11: 32 `sources.md` files carry "Research doc" paths into these directories. Effort S.
+   > **Decision (2026-09-12):** Keep. `docs/research/` is retained on purpose — it's read by agents doing work sourced from those docs. Not proceeding.
+
+10. [x] ~~**Delete per-skill `README.md` and `references/README.md` (48 files, 1,574 lines).** They restate the SKILL.md in narrative form. The pre-commit config itself notes a skill README "is consumer-facing prose that no agent ever loads". Keep one plugin-level README with one line per skill. Requires dropping the README criterion in `skill-audit/references/file-structure.md` and the README step in `new-skill.sh`. Effort S.~~
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `edcc57c` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Deleted the 48 per-skill/reference READMEs plus 2 scaffold templates; dropped the README criterion from `skill-audit`'s `file-structure.md` and `finding-criteria.md` and the README-generation step from `new-skill.sh`; updated `new-skill.bats` to match. Plugin-root READMEs were kept, not part of this finding.
+
+11. **Drop the provenance chain: `sources.md`, `source_keys` frontmatter, `validate-provenance.sh`.** 32 plugin and skill `sources.md` files (about 1,300 lines) plus 9 research indexes, 216 source files with `source_keys`, two copies of the validator (1,198 and 632 lines) with ten checks, and 125 bats tests exist to track which upstream informed which file. Git blame and a URL in the README do the same job. This is more code than the content it tracks. Effort M (touches skill-audit, both validator copies, two repo tests, and every skill's frontmatter).
+    > **Verified (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`):** direction defensible, two scope figures wrong, and **blocked on a decision the finding never poses**. The `sources.md` census below is exact, and so are the finding's own validator and bats figures (1,198 / 632 lines, 125 bats tests); the scope errors are narrower than an earlier revision of this note claimed.
+    >
+    > Corrected figures: **46 `sources.md` files / 1,752 lines** in three distinct classes — 29 skill `references/sources.md` (1,217 lines), 13 research indexes (435), 4 plugin-root files (100, ADR-0010). The finding does **not** double-count: it states two disjoint classes additively ("32 plugin and skill `sources.md` files (about 1,300 lines) **plus** 9 research indexes"), and that plugin-and-skill subtotal is really **33 files / 1,317 lines**, matching its "about 1,300" exactly — had the 32 swept in the research indexes the figure would have been ~1,750. Its real errors there are an off-by-one (32 should be 33) and an omission: it missed the 4 vendored example indexes under `kyberforge/docs/research/examples/skill-write/`, so 9 should be 13. Carriers of `source_keys` in YAML frontmatter: **196** — 168 at column 0 and 28 nested two spaces under `metadata:` — so the finding's 216 is closer to the truth than it looks. (219 files merely *mention* the string. A naive `^[[:space:]]*source_keys:` grep returns 200, but 4 of those are heredoc or fixture text rather than frontmatter: both `validate-provenance.bats` copies, `scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh`, and a fenced example in `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/research/references/file-format.md`.) Checks: **16 across the two copies** (skill-audit 0–9, agent-audit 0–5), not ten. Validator line counts (1,198 / 632) and 125 bats tests are exact.
+    >
+    > **"Touches every skill's frontmatter" is roughly right.** **28 of the 39 real skills carry `source_keys` in frontmatter**, nested under `metadata:` — see `plugins/git/.apm/skills/git-commits/SKILL.md:10-17`, where `metadata:` → `source_keys:` carries four slugs. (44 tracked files match `*SKILL.md`; subtract `skill-author/assets/templates/SKILL.md` and the 4 vendored under `kyberforge/docs/research/examples/skill-write/`, leaving 39 real skills.) The 11 without it are exactly the `plugins/bin/` skills. Check 2 in the skill-audit validator (SKILL.md `source_keys` → slug in `sources.md`) is correspondingly **live**, not dead code: `parse_source_keys()` at `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-audit/scripts/validate-provenance.sh:242-270` handles both spellings explicitly — the metadata-nested branch at `:257`, the top-level branch at `:260`, and a docstring that says "handles metadata.source_keys and top-level" — check 2 at `:766` runs against all 28 carrier skills, every one of which has a `references/sources.md`, and bats pins it at `validate-provenance.bats:222` ("FAIL: source_keys slug in SKILL.md not present as H2 in sources.md") and `:1313` (a BOM must not silently disable check 2). The imbalance the finding names is real and **worse** than claimed: 4,641 validator+bats lines against 1,752 of metadata, a 2.6:1 ratio.
+    >
+    > **Omitted entirely: the chain has a producer.** `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/research/` *specifies* the `sources.md` + `source_keys:` output format, and `plugins/bin/evals/research/research/eval.yaml` carries three criteria asserting it. **This is the blocking decision: does `research` keep emitting `sources.md`?** If yes, the chain is not dropped — only unenforced, and the finding collapses to "delete the validators." If no, the research skill's output contract and its evals need redesigning.
+    >
+    > Also breaks: `check-scope-walkup-sync` loses one of four walk-up ports (the hook exists because three scripts drifted); `tests/test-adr0020-contract.sh` loses its parser byte-identity assertion; `tests/test-check-scope-walkup-sync.sh` must re-base its fixture; ADR-0010 is superseded outright and ADR-0009/0016 need amending (`field-inventory.md`'s allowlist data line carries `source_keys`). `LESSONS.md:73` records this validator as the **only** thing that catches a skill authored outside `skill-author` — a failure that "recurred twice in one session" — so "git blame + a README URL do the same job" is false for the one thing the chain demonstrably catches. Side effect: 55 reference files have frontmatter containing *only* `source_keys:`, leaving empty `---\n---` blocks to delete.
+    >
+    > **Effort L, not M** (~6,393 lines deleted across 242 files: the 4,641 validator and bats lines plus the 1,752 of `sources.md` measured above, across 196 `source_keys` carriers and 46 `sources.md` files. An earlier revision of this note said ~4,600 lines across ~230 files, which was internally inconsistent — 4,600 is validator-plus-bats only and silently drops the `sources.md` this same note measures, and ~230 inherited a carrier count of 172 that missed every `metadata:`-nested file.) Smaller alternative worth considering: scope the drop to the skill half only (1,217 lines, 1,198-line validator, 82 tests) and leave the ADR-0010 plugin-root half alone — no ADR supersession needed.
+
+12. [x] ~~**Strip ADR and changelog narration from model-facing files.** `ADR-0020` is cited in 3 of 7 kyberforge SKILL.md files and 16 references; ADR-0023 is cited inline 21 times in the git plugin. Examples: "was the old house rule and ADR-0020 deleted it", "were removed per ADR-0015 once issue #90 landed", "this file previously recorded `list_issues` as having neither a `type` nor a `milestones` parameter". `skill-author/references/retrofit.md` (197 lines) is a one-time migration guide; it is loaded from `improve.md` and listed in `sources.md`, so remove those in the same change. These belong in git history or the ADR, not in context. Effort S.~~
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `edcc57c` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Historical narration stripped from kyberforge (ADR-0020) and git (ADR-0023) skill content; `retrofit.md` deleted along with its load-step and `sources.md` entries. Caught in review: some `ADR-0023` tags were not narration but the `check-rtk-prefix` hook's required opt-out marker for intentionally-bare git commands — those 12 were restored, not left stripped.
+
+13. [x] ~~**State repeated boilerplate once or delete it.** A near-identical "Resolve owner and repo" block in 5 of 7 gitea skills; 404-masks-403 in 6 files; manual pagination in 7; main/master refusal in 9 git files; the "use the project's domain glossary, respect ADRs" paragraph in 5 bin skills. Three git skills define three different structured-result JSON shapes whose only consumer is `git-orchestrate` (finding 19). Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `6cfc357`. Trimmed each repeated instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting to a shared file (blocked by the one-file-per-skill install constraint, ADR-0014): the "Resolve owner and repo" block across 5 `gitea-*` skills, the 404-masks-403 note across 6 gitea files, the manual-pagination explanation across 8 gitea files, the main/master force-push refusal across 7 git plugin files (some with multiple internal restatements), and the domain-glossary/ADR paragraph across 5 `bin` skills. This was a trim-in-place pass, not a merge: the cross-skill duplication itself remains and is coupled to the (out-of-scope) skill-merge findings 19/20. Left the three git skills' structured-result JSON shapes untouched, as directed. Verified no regressions with `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` (pre/post diff) and `claude plugin validate` on both plugins.
+
+### 4.2 kyberforge (290 files, 44,568 lines incl. mirror; the 7 SKILL.md bodies are 333 lines, under 1%)
+
+14. **Merge `skill-audit` + `agent-audit` into one `audit` skill (removes about 3,300 lines and two pre-push hooks).** `vale-wrap.sh` is byte-identical in both; five Vale rules byte-identical (agent-audit carries one extra, so it is the superset); `validate.sh` shares a 1,061-line boundary-target resolver block that diffs as zero lines; SKILL.md steps 1, 3, 4 and the gotchas are the same text. Each copy is hard-wired to one mode, so the merged script needs a path switch. The duplication exists because a plugin-cache install copies only each skill's own files (the rule ADR-0014 follows), so a script cannot be shared across skills; merging the skills is the only way to remove the copy. Effort M.
+
+15. **Merge `skill-author` + `agent-author` likewise.** `contract.md` shares most of its Description section; `new-skill.sh` and `new-agent.sh` implement the same package-root walk-up with different mode names; step 1 dispatch tables and step 3 gates are near-identical. Keep the agent scope logic (plugin vs project/user) as its own reference. Effort M.
+
+16. **Cut the validators by an order of magnitude.** `validate.sh` is 1,677 lines of bash with embedded Python, ported twice; `skill-size-check.sh` is 1,497. Target about 200 lines total: frontmatter present, size ceilings, boundary targets resolve. The 526-line `vale-wrap.sh` exists to work around folded `>` scalars in descriptions; writing descriptions as `|` literal blocks removes the folding problem, but the wrapper is also the exported hook entry in `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` and carries the NOT RUN guard the audits depend on, so it shrinks rather than disappears. This is where the real complexity lives and is the item most worth discussing. Effort L.
+    > **Refuted (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`). Finding 16 has no independent content — its only safe saving belongs to finding 14.**
+    >
+    > The three validators are **not three implementations**. They contain **one block, 1,061 lines, byte-identical in all three**, delimited by `# ===== BEGIN/END ADR-0020 SHARED BOUNDARY RESOLVER =====` and hashed by `tests/test-adr0020-contract.sh`. So 3,183 of 4,932 validator lines (65%) are that block × 3, and **what is left once the resolver is excised is 1,749 lines across all three** — 1,580 non-blank, 992 with comments and blanks both stripped. The duplication is forced by the self-containment constraint, which is why *merging* is the lever and *shrinking* is not.
+    >
+    > Corrected figures: `skill-size-check.sh` is **1,517**. The finding's 1,497 was correct when written — `git show 9eb8bc7:scripts/skill-size-check.sh` is 1,497 lines, and `9eb8bc7` (2026-09-10) is this audit's own first commit. It went stale two days *after*, at `c8a7c9e` (2026-09-12), the commit that folded `skill-frontmatter` in — which is why the finding's "frontmatter present" target is now work already done, not why its number was wrong. agent-audit's `validate.sh` is **1,738**, a superset, not a 1,677-line port. `vale-wrap.sh` 526 × 2 is exact.
+    >
+    > **The 200-line target is off by an order of magnitude.** The resolver's executable core alone, every comment and blank stripped, is **549 lines** (of its 1,061: 411 comment, 101 blank) — **2.7×** the whole proposed budget, before any of the three scripts' own diagnostics. Counting call sites to `error`/`fail`, `suggest` and `info`, those number 23 in `skill-size-check.sh`, 31 in skill-audit's `validate.sh` and 38 in agent-audit's. ADR-0020 mandates **10** deterministic gates — its Enforcement table has 15 content rows: 10 `deterministic`, 1 `prose pattern`, 4 `auditor judgment` — and explicitly warns against "a rule filed under 'Enforcement' that no validator implements". **5,506 lines of tests** guard these scripts: the six repo suites over `skill-size-check.sh` (3,619) plus the two in-skill `validate.bats` (965 + 922). Realistic floor with prose intact and duplication removed: **~2,600–2,900**; comment-stripped and fully merged, ~1,100–1,200.
+    >
+    > **The comment volume is an incident log, not filler** — 26 verbatim failing input strings and four filed issues (#99, #107, #108, #110). Samples: deriving the skill universe from `$BASH_SOURCE` "leaked holocron's 39-skill universe into every consumer repo"; a worktree named `feature[2]` turned a glob into a character class and "silently disabled the gate tree-wide"; `description:` followed by `model: sonnet` "exited 0 with zero output on a BLOCKING pre-push gate"; a 550-char description with a 1,000-word body "exited 0 behind a BOM". Exactly one clause argues for speculative retention and flags itself as unexercised. Same pattern as findings 3, 5 and 24.
+    >
+    > **The `vale-wrap` half is wrong on its conclusion.** `|` literal blocks do fix the folding case — the script says so and deliberately no-ops on them — but the wrapper handles **four** affected scalar forms (folded `>`, bare plain, double- and single-quoted continuation lines), and **277 of its 526 lines are argv handling unrelated to folding** (cwd-relative absolutization, the `is_builtin_output` guard, scratch-tree mirroring, path relativization), each with its own incident record. Decisively, `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` exports these hooks to external consumer repos whose scalar style this repo cannot dictate. Converting the 40 in-repo descriptions to `|` is a fine independent change; **it does not shrink the wrapper.**
+    >
+    > Where the savings actually are: **merge skill-audit + agent-audit (finding 14) → −1,587 lines, zero coverage loss.** A second option — sourcing the resolver into `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` rather than embedding it (−1,061) — is technically possible but couples the root hook to plugin layout and dismantles the byte-identity contract test's design; needs a decision, not an assumption.
+
+17. **Fold `forge` and `apm-install`.** `forge` is a four-row routing table plus 207 lines of references explaining fork vs inline; it should be 25 lines with no references. `apm-install` (53 lines + 17-line sources) becomes a sixth dispatch row in `apm-workflow`. Effort S.
+
+18. **Delete prose the model already knows.** "Valid characters: lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens"; what pipx does and PEP 668; "code blocks carry a language tag"; "data to stdout, diagnostics to stderr". Ironically `body-discipline.md` instructs auditors not to include "concepts the agent already knows". Effort S.
+    > **Re-scoped and folded into finding 22 (2026-09-14).** All four named examples were located, and they are four different classes of thing — only one is what the finding describes:
+    >
+    > | Example | Location | What it actually is |
+    > |---|---|---|
+    > | "Code blocks carry a language tag" | `skill-audit/references/formatting-and-scripts.md:19` | An **audit criterion** |
+    > | "Data to stdout, diagnostics to stderr" | same file, line 39 | An **audit criterion** |
+    > | "Valid characters: lowercase letters…" | `skill-author/assets/templates/SKILL.md:7` | A **scaffold comment** emitted into new skills by `new-skill.sh`; never loaded as model context |
+    > | pipx / PEP 668 | `apm-install/SKILL.md:35-36`, `skill-author/references/scripts.md` | Generic tool prose — the only true positive |
+    >
+    > Three exemptions agreed, which is what re-scopes the finding:
+    >
+    > - **Audit criteria are exempt.** `body-discipline.md:14` frames the rule as "Would the agent get this wrong without this instruction?" — an auditor *would*, because the criterion is what it reports against. Cutting criteria is a redesign of what `skill-audit` checks, which belongs with finding 14.
+    > - **`assets/templates/` is exempt.** Scaffold output, not context.
+    > - **Sourced restatement of a spec this repo's own artifacts are built to is exempt.** `skill-author/references/scripts.md` carries `source_keys: agentskills-using-scripts` and deliberately restates the agentskills.io spec — the contract every skill here is written against, so the restatement governs this repo's artifacts and has to be in front of the author. **`source_keys:` alone is not the test**, and cannot be: `conventional-commits-spec.md` and `bisect.md` both carry it too, and finding 20 recommends reducing both to a pointer plus the house delta. The decidable line is what the content governs — a spec this repo's artifacts must satisfy (agentskills.io) is exempt; documentation of an external tool the model already has (Conventional Commits, `git bisect`) is not. Grounding, stated honestly: findings 9 and 26 closed as "Keep — vendored upstream content is intentional", but both closed over the `docs/research/` and `docs/notes/` *directories*, not over skill `references/*.md`; extending them to `scripts.md` is this note's inference, not a recorded decision. (An earlier revision added "finding 11 re-decides this content's status anyway" — withdrawn: finding 11 proposes dropping the provenance *metadata and validators*, not the sourced prose.)
+    >
+    > What remains is unsourced explanatory prose in skill bodies and non-criteria references — roughly **30–60 lines across kyberforge**, where `apm-install/SKILL.md` yields about one clause. Too small to stand alone, and the same class of writing as finding 22 with a larger surface and no sourced-content conflict. **Merged into finding 22 under these exemptions; not a separate work item.** Safety note established while scoping: `validate-provenance.sh` is not a pre-push gate (the only `.pre-commit-config.yaml` reference is `check-scope-walkup-sync`, over the walk-up port) and validates `sources.md` structure, never line-level traceability — so trimming sourced prose trips no gate provided frontmatter and `sources.md` are left intact. **Loose end in the fold, stated so it is not lost:** finding 22's total is computed over five `bin` skills (1,018 lines) and its implementation sizing names two agents, neither touching kyberforge — so these 30–60 lines sit outside the scope finding 22 states. Track them there as a separate line item with its own estimate; they are not covered by "bin: strip generic process theatre" as written.
+
+### 4.3 git and gitea (153 + 93 files, 9,889 + 6,047 lines incl. mirror; source 3,288 + 2,286)
+
+19. **Delete the two router skills and two orchestrate agents (309 lines + 195 reference lines).** No skill invokes them as a step; they appear only in boundary clauses (`AGENTS.md`, `git-worktrees`, `gitea-issues`, `gitea-prs`) and as worked examples in agent-audit references, all of which must change in the same commit or `skill-size-check` fails on the dangling target. Claude Code already routes on descriptions. The chain today is `git-workflow` step 5 invokes `git-orchestrate`, whose step 5 invokes `git-commits`, which runs `rtk git commit`: three hops. Both agents exceed 900 words; ADR-0020 deliberately sets no agent body gate. Effort S.
+    > **Not proceeding (2026-09-13):** premise doesn't hold. There are no separate "router skills" — only two `.agent.md` files. `git-orchestrate` is not a dangling boundary-clause reference; it's `git-workflow` step 5's actual execution backend (documented both directions), so deleting it breaks `git-workflow`'s only execution path rather than tidying an orphan. `gitea-orchestrate` is intentional per ADR-0011 (agent-facing counterpart for agent callers) even though `gitea-workflow` doesn't call it. A third, undocumented instance of the same pattern (`apm-orchestrate`) exists and isn't addressed by this finding. The four boundary-clause locations named above don't actually reference either agent. No changes made. This needs the "short discussion" §7 bucket 2 implies, not a mechanical delete.
+
+20. **Collapse git 7 skills to 1; gitea 7 to 2.** Git references are man-page restatement: `git-log-format.md` (242 lines listing `%H`, `%ar`), `conventional-commits-spec.md` (170 lines), `worktrees.md` (178), `merging.md` explaining fast-forward. Roughly 60% of the plugin is generic. The genuinely house-specific content fits in about 150 lines: the `rtk` rule and ADR-0023 exceptions, main/master refusal, `--no-verify`, the `-i --autosquash` 2.39.5 trap, `--force-with-lease --force-if-includes`, bisect exit codes, submodule push ordering, the detached-HEAD worktree trap. Gitea is more legitimately specific (MCP schema quirks: `tree_sha`, `withLines`, silent drops on PR create, `per_page` 20 vs 30, 404 means 403) and splits naturally into `gitea-tracker` (issues, PRs, labels, milestones) and `gitea-repo` (branches, files, releases). Risk: one description must carry all trigger phrases; keep a dispatch table at the top of the body. Keep `pc-author` and `pc-run` (finding 38). Effort M.
+    > **Refuted as specified (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`). The routing concern is not a risk to mitigate — it is a blocking gate failure.**
+    >
+    > What holds: skill counts (git 7 `git-*` + `pc-*`, gitea 7); the four named git reference files at their stated sizes (`git-log-format.md` 242, `conventional-commits-spec.md` 170, `worktrees.md` 178; `merging.md` is 31, among the smallest). "Roughly 60% generic" holds at the top of its range — two independent methods give **54–60%**. Gitea being "more legitimately specific" holds and is **understated**: gitea is ~**72% house-specific**, the inverse of git, with ~50 MCP quirks beyond the five named (no `method:"close"` on `issue_write`; `draft:true` is literally a `"WIP:"` title prefix; **no update tool for releases exists at all**; `replace_labels` clears unlisted labels; org-label methods take `org` not `owner`). Note commit `6cfc357` (finding 13) touched none of the four named files, so its trim does not deflate this evidence.
+    >
+    > **The 150-line target fails on the finding's own arithmetic.** 60% generic of 1,891 non-`sources.md` lines leaves **756** house-specific; an independent full read puts the floor at **~918**. Off by 5–6×. The house-specific list is also not exhaustive — it misses the rest of the ADR-0023 bare-`git` exceptions (**~23 sites across nine files**, which collapse to about **ten distinct documented reasons**, not one per site: the four `git log -L` lines share one reason, the four `--word-diff` lines another, the two `git diff --name-*` lines a third — the genuinely distinct ones include `git branch --list`'s phantom `* ` line, `stash pop` swallowing the conflict report, `stash list` printing `No stashes` where git prints nothing, and the inner `$(git config remote.origin.url)` substitution, where output rewriting would poison a remote URL), a second version trap (`worktree add --orphan` needs 2.42+, exits 129 on 2.39.5), `commit-template.md` (66 lines, wholly house), **three** specified JSON result shapes across the six skills that carry an output section (`git-commits/SKILL.md:54`, `git-remotes:48`, `git-branches:61`) plus the request schema in `git-branches/references/orchestrator-contract.md`, and every cross-skill dispatch clause. Conversely one item **on** the list is misfiled: **bisect exit codes restate `git bisect run`'s own docs** (`bisect.md` is ~97% generic).
+    >
+    > **Git 7→1 is uncommittable.** Measured against `skill-size-check`'s FAIL tiers: description **1,950 chars = 4.9× the 400 ceiling**, body **3,381 words = 3.8× the 900 ceiling**, and the plugin is already at 492 of 500 whole-file lines. The finding's own mitigation — "keep a dispatch table at the top of the body" — *adds* body words to a budget already 3.8× over, and ADR-0020 makes stating the same trigger in two registers a FAIL in its own right. The smallest existing git description is 214 chars for **one** domain.
+    >
+    > **Gitea 7→2 fails the same gate and puts a seam through the commonest workflow.** Both halves FAIL the description ceiling: `gitea-tracker` (issues + PRs + labels/milestones) sums to **991 chars**, `gitea-repo` (branches + files + releases) to **989** — 2.5× the 400 ceiling, measured as `skill-size-check`'s `description_value()` measures it (YAML-folded, whitespace-collapsed). The proposal also silently drops `gitea-workflow`, a seventh skill it never places, so "7→2" is really 7→2-plus-a-deletion. `gitea-repo` would carry 20 of 32 MCP tools across three unrelated families. And the structural objection: the split puts a hard cross-skill boundary through the commonest real workflow — edit-a-file-then-open-a-PR lands `gitea-files` and `gitea-prs` on opposite sides of the `tracker`/`repo` seam, forcing the same duplicate-or-reach-across choice ADR-0011 rejected the 5-skill option for, at a different seam. **What this is not: blocked by ADR-0011's reasoning.** An earlier revision argued that ADR-0011 rejected a 5-skill split and `gitea-tracker` "bundles strictly more", so it is rejected a fortiori — withdrawn, the premise is false. ADR-0011's stated reason is that bundling labels under `gitea-issues` "forc[es] `gitea-prs` to either duplicate the guide or reach into `gitea-issues`' `references/` — breaking the self-contained skill boundary": an objection to a *boundary being crossed*, not to bundle size. `gitea-tracker` puts issues, PRs, labels and milestones in one skill, so there is no boundary to cross and no guide to duplicate. What remains of ADR-0011 here is procedural: reversing the recorded 7-skill split needs a superseding ADR. Merging concatenates; it does not compress.
+    >
+    > **Interaction with rejected finding 19, unacknowledged:** collapsing git to one skill absorbs `git-workflow` itself — one of the seven — so its 8-row Domains table would route to itself, and leaves `git-orchestrate` a dispatcher with exactly one target, its contract vacuous. Finding 19 was rejected for doing less than this, mechanically.
+    >
+    > Blast radius if ever revisited: **68 backticked references to git skill names, 99 to gitea names** under `plugins/`. Only the ones in a `SKILL.md` are boundary targets `skill-size-check` resolves and FAILs on if dangling — its `files:` regex is `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$`, so it opens nothing else — and that is **35 of the 68 git mentions and 26 of the 99 gitea ones**. The remaining 33 and 73 live in `references/*.md`, the two orchestrate agents (10 and 23 on their own), the plugin READMEs, kyberforge's audit and author references, and two `validate.sh` copies — none of which this gate opens: they still have to be rewritten by hand, but they fail no hook. Plus `AGENTS.md:16,18`, `README.md:21-22`, `CONTEXT.md:168` (uses `gitea-prs` as the naming exemplar), `architecture.md:34` (uses `git-branches` vs `gitea-branches` as the canonical boundary example), and ADRs 0011, 0020, 0021, 0022, 0023. Two false alarms not worth chasing: `tests/test-check-rtk-prefix.sh:97` reads from a pinned historical SHA, and `scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh`'s mention is in a comment.
+    >
+    > **Salvageable independently, ~230 lines:** `conventional-commits-spec.md` (~98% generic) and `bisect.md` (~97%) are the only two files where the generic-restatement thesis fully holds — reduce each to a pointer plus the house delta. Also worth a finding-13-style trim-in-place: the issue-vs-PR disambiguation duplicated across 4 gitea files. Neither needs a merge.
+
+21. [x] ~~**Delete `config.example.json` / `.claude/plugins/git/config.json`.** Read by two steps, written by nothing. Default to GitHub Flow with the existing `develop` / `release/*` inference. Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `f5e4d0d`. Deleted `plugins/git/config.example.json` (the runtime `.claude/plugins/git/config.json` was never a tracked file). Removed the config-read step from `git-orchestrate`'s Process and from `git-branches`' Step 1, leaving the existing default-inference logic (GitHub Flow, with Gitflow inferred from a `develop`/`release/*` branch) as the sole path; updated `git-workflow`'s description of the orchestrator's behaviour to match. Dropped the now-dangling `applied_config` field from `git-orchestrate`'s output shape and the `config.example.json` example from `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
+
+### 4.4 bin, core, lint (88 + 49 + 31 files incl. mirror)
+
+22. **bin: strip generic process theatre.** `write-docs` is 109 lines, mostly form-filling sections plus a 15-line source provenance block; its rules fit in 25 lines. `tdd` is about 70% textbook (RED/GREEN diagram, "good tests are integration-style", five thin references restating textbook design advice). `diagnose` 40%, `prototype` 50% (pixel-level UI switcher spec), `grill-with-docs` 35%. Keep the opinionated parts: "no horizontal slicing", "no phase 2 without a loop", `[DEBUG-xxxx]` tags, "never infer the output path", the triage state machine. Effort M.
+    > **Verified (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`): percentages inflated 3–4×, target set wrong, but a real and better defect found. This finding also now carries finding 18's re-scoped remainder** (unsourced explanatory prose only — audit criteria, `assets/templates/` and sourced spec restatement are exempt; see finding 18).
+    >
+    > Corrected percentages, by a stated method (a line counts generic only if it states a general SE principle with no repo-specific term, no named house convention, and would survive unchanged in any textbook): `diagnose` **~10–15%**, not 40%. `prototype` **~13%**, not 50% — and its `?variant=` switcher spec is a prescriptive house convention (floating bar, arrow keys, `NODE_ENV` gating), not theatre. `grill-with-docs` **~10%**, not 35%. `tdd` **~25%** in the body, ~53% only at directory scope, not 70%. On the "RED/GREEN diagram" the finding names for deletion: `tdd/SKILL.md` has three diagrams, so the name is ambiguous. The horizontal-vs-vertical block (`:36-46`, whose own rows are labelled `RED:`/`GREEN:`) is the clearest statement of the skill's central opinion and should stay; the two literal `RED:`/`GREEN:` loop blocks at `:71-74` and `:82-85` are what the finding most plausibly means, and those two are textbook and go — eight lines with their fences. So the rebuttal stands only for the horizontal-vs-vertical block; it is an eight-line cut either way, not a case against the skill's one original diagram. `write-docs` is exactly 109 lines ✓, but "its rules fit in 25 lines" is wrong — the Process section alone is 17 lines of real content; floor is ~55–60.
+    >
+    > **Two of five keep-list items name skills this finding never targets** — "never infer the output path" is `research/SKILL.md:25`, the triage state machine is in `triage`. And **the target set does not match the repo's own over-budget list**: `skill-size-check` flags six `bin` skills; this finding names two that pass clean (`prototype`, `grill-with-docs`) and misses three that are over — `improve-codebase-architecture` (730w + 316-char desc), `research` (703w), `triage` (712w).
+    >
+    > **The real defect, which "form-filling sections" understates: `write-docs` is 54% restatement.** 431 of the **801** body words the gate counts (`skill-size-check` reports 801; the 775 an earlier revision used omits the heading words the gate includes). Constraints (126w), When-to-use (110w), Failure handling (104w) and Self-check (91w) each restate the Process section or the description. Measured claim by claim, the repetition is wider than "four claims four times": the Reader-Testing scoping rule appears **five** times (lines 63/80/88/96/107); file approval before reading **four** (58/68/93/103); the delta summary **four** (62/78/87/106); stage-skip logging **four** (59/72/94/104); "every claim traceable, never invent behaviour" **four** (34/57/101/102); show-the-full-section-before-gating **three** (60/76/105). `contract.md:119` explicitly forbids this: *"Exclude: Restatements of the description — it is already in context."* It is also the corpus's only outlier frontmatter — the sole `SKILL.md` of the **39** real skills carrying `when:`, `updated:` or `source:` (44 files are named `SKILL.md` under `plugins/`; 1 is a template under `skill-author/assets/templates/` and 4 are vendored under `kyberforge/docs/research/examples/skill-write/`, the same 39 `architecture.md:82` states).
+    >
+    > **Realistic total ~150–180 lines of 1,018 (15–18%)**, itemised so it adds up: `tdd`'s three textbook references **74 lines** (`refactoring.md` 10 — a Fowler smell list; `deep-modules.md` 33 — self-declared *"From 'A Philosophy of Software Design'"*; `interface-design.md` 31 — generic DI advice), where `improve-codebase-architecture` already carries richer house-specific treatments of both concepts; `write-docs` 109 → ~58, so **~51**; `tdd`'s body at ~25% generic, **~25**; `diagnose` **~15**. That sums to ~165. The three textbook references are **~45%** of the cut, not the ~75% an earlier revision claimed — 74 of ~165. `prototype` and `grill-with-docs` contribute nothing, per the scope recommendation below, and finding 18's folded kyberforge remainder (30–60 lines) sits outside this 1,018-line denominator.
+    >
+    > **Coupling — the important caution.** This corpus has already been through two trim passes, and the last one broke two of these five targets the same way. PR #129 (`598a7c3`) records: *"`prototype` and `vale-config` deleted rules outright that survived nowhere."* This finding proposes redoing that operation on `prototype` and `diagnose`. **Recommend dropping `prototype` and `grill-with-docs` from scope entirely** — both pass every gate and both have prior-regression history. Also: deleting a `references/*.md` named in a body is a hard ERROR (`skill-size-check.sh:1265`), so `tdd`'s reference deletions and its SKILL.md relinks must land in one commit; `improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md:77,79` hard-name `grill-with-docs`'s `context-format.md` and `adr-format.md` by path, so neither can be renamed; and shrinking `write-docs` falsifies live comments at `skill-size-check.sh:64,596`, `tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh:592` and `architecture.md:82`. Unlike finding 23's `caveman`/`zoom-out`, **none of these five is cited as a convention exemplar** anywhere.
+    >
+    > Sizing if implemented: two parallelizable agents over disjoint files — A on `write-docs` (self-contained, no references), B on `tdd` (reference deletion + same-commit relink, ERROR-gated, cannot be split). `diagnose` is ~15 lines, too small for its own agent.
+
+23. **bin: merge `grill-me` into `grill-with-docs`.** `grill-me` is 16 lines and a subset of the docs flow; `grill-with-docs` creates `CONTEXT.md` when missing, so the merged skill needs a no-write opt-out. `caveman` (50 lines) and `zoom-out` (9) are hand-invoked prompts rather than workflow skills; they are also the repo's `disable-model-invocation` exemplars in `CONTEXT.md`, `contract.md`, ADR-0020, ADR-0021, and `gates.md`, and `install.sh` has no path for `~/.claude/commands/`, so moving them means picking a new exemplar. `improve-codebase-architecture` defines its glossary twice (inline and in `language.md`; the README documents the split as intentional). Effort S.
+
+24. **core: `provider-adapter-author` is a 1,200-line wrapper around one instruction** ("replace duplicated lines with `@AGENTS.md`, keep provider-specific lines"): a 496-line validator with a 519-line bats suite for a check that is a grep. `agentsmd-author` already calls `agentsmd-audit` as mandatory closeout, and both route to `provider-adapter-author` in boundary clauses that must change with it. Target: one `agentsmd` skill with an audit mode, adapter conversion as a step, validator about 40 lines. Needs an ADR-0012 revisit. Effort L.
+    > **Refuted (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`). Not deferred — the target fails the repo's own gate before any judgment call is reached, so the ADR-0012 §8 question is moot for this finding.**
+    >
+    > **The merge is arithmetically impossible as specified.** Body word counts: `agentsmd-author` 485 + `agentsmd-audit` 361 + `provider-adapter-author` 514 = **1,360 words against `BODY_MAX_WORDS=900`** (ADR-0020 hard FAIL). Descriptions: 251 + 275 + 280 = **806 chars into a field capped at 400**. Relocating the overflow into `references/` is PR #129's named anti-goal, and issue #117 records that `references/` is where neither the size gate nor Vale looks.
+    >
+    > **Both factual anchors describe a validator that no longer exists.** `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` was **141 lines at birth** (`6fd6876`) and in that form *was* approximately a grep — which is why it shipped two recorded defects: `a8cd5e8` (a UTF-8 BOM hid the import line, so a `CLAUDE.md` whose first line was `@AGENTS.md` failed with "no reference to AGENTS.md" and was told to add the line already in front of it) and issue **#115** (`c59e4bf`: the `--no-import-syntax` flag was a proven no-op — "both branches reduce to the same expression"). 141 → 496 is the fix for those. **"Validator about 40 lines" targets below the version whose defects are on the record.** Line counts otherwise exact: validator 496, bats 519 — but "1,200-line wrapper" is 1,164, of which the *wrapper* is 52; **1,015 are validator + tests** (1,071 with the two READMEs, 28 each), and the remaining 41 are `references/`.
+    >
+    > Coverage given up by a 40-line validator: **~67% of the 42-test suite**. **20** tests sit under explicit `Q1`–`Q5` headers — Q1 inert fenced/indented/HTML-comment regions (5), Q2 valid-UTF-8-but-not-UTF-8 encodings (4), Q3 exists-but-unreadable (1), Q4 path resolution (4), Q5 pointer-vs-mention (6); 8 more are hardening, so 28 of 42. Every one was proven non-vacuous by deliberate mutation under PR #129. Representative guards: a ```-fenced `@AGENTS.md` "exited 0"; `@NOTAGENTS.md` counted as an import for want of a path-segment boundary; `"AGENTS.md" in ln` passed *"Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete."*; BOM-less UTF-16LE decodes as valid UTF-8 and produced a false diagnosis; exit 2/3 split from 1 "because the skill's closeout tells the agent to fix every non-zero exit by editing the provider file, which for a mistyped flag edits the wrong file forever".
+    >
+    > **The self-containment constraint does not support this finding the way it supports 14/15** — there is no cross-skill duplication here to merge away. `agentsmd-audit`'s three scripts share essentially nothing with `validate-adapter.sh` (no `read_text`, no BOM handling, no NUL check; they exit 1 on usage errors). Merging would *expose* that they are unhardened — costing lines, not saving them.
+    >
+    > Two further blockers if it were ever revisited: the merge dissolves `agentsmd-author`'s standing prohibition *"Never write to a provider file yourself, in any circumstance"* (SKILL.md:21), a hazard `c59e4bf` closed after the validator's own size-FAIL remediation text "actively invited the prohibited edit"; and `skill-size-check.sh:121` + `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh:729` both cite `a8cd5e8`'s exit-2 split as precedent for their own, so deleting it orphans two live cross-references.
+
+25. **lint: delete the `lint-runner` agent.** Its body is "call `vale-run`, reformat output", which `--output=JSON` already gives; it exists for backends that do not exist. It is the example boundary clause in three `agent-author` templates and ADR-0016, so those need a new example. About 40% of `vale-config` is install tables and settings lists the model can fetch from vale.sh. Keep the house-verified matrices (`E100`/`E201`, `Packages` below glob, frontmatter, ignore paths). `lint/docs/research/docs/vale/` overlaps the skill's own references by about two thirds. Effort S.
+
+## 5. Prose and docs (9,600 lines, 109,000 words outside plugins)
+
+26. **Move or delete `docs/research/` and `docs/notes/` (4,500 lines, 47% of prose words).** Six of eleven research files are linked only from each other; they are self-described session audit trails, agendas, and a "temporary build reference". `docs/notes/factory-research-gaps-conflicts.md` says "Status: Superseded"; `factory-integration-decisions.md` says "Complete" and its decisions already live in ADRs, yet `AGENTS.md` tells every session to read it. `archive/team-self-organisation-sprint-brief.md` (3,400 words) is unrelated to this repo. Archive or delete; drop the three `AGENTS.md` pointers. Moving `CONTROLS.md` to `docs/spec/` means updating its literal path in nine or more files including the deployed `governance.md`. Effort S.
+    > **Decision (2026-09-12):** Keep. Same reasoning as finding 9 — these docs are intentional context for sourced work. Not proceeding.
+
+27. **Four governance documents say one thing.** `core/instructions/governance.md` (949 words, always-on), `docs/ai-constitution.md` (2,906), `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` (1,413), `CONTROLS.md` (1,224), with near-identical preambles and, in three of the four, a "what this file does not govern" block pointing at the others. The constitution repeats one of its own principle lead sentences. Keep `governance.md` as the operative file, trimmed to about 50 lines (drop the classification table that repeats the bullets above it, the footer, the non-governance block). Dedupe the constitution by about 20%. Effort M.
+    > **Refuted as framed (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`). All four word counts are exact — the first finding in this audit whose figures survive checking — and everything built on them fails.**
+    >
+    > **"Four documents say one thing" misreads audience separation as duplication.** They are one principle set projected onto four execution surfaces, and each projection is load-bearing: `governance.md` is imperative *to the model* and injected into every session; `HUMANS.md` is imperative *to a person* on a wiki; `CONTROLS.md` is a declarative spec *for CI tooling*; the constitution is the justification layer with citations. Take "secrets never enter AI context": the constitution states it with evidence, `governance.md` tells the model never to emit one, `HUMANS.md` tells the person never to paste one, `CONTROLS.md` specifies the pre-commit hook that catches both when the first two fail. `CONTROLS.md:8` names this explicitly — *"Agent instructions and human practitioner rules are probabilistic… A control that runs automatically in CI enforces a principle more reliably than any instruction in any file."* The three "what this file does not govern" blocks are the seams that keep the four from bleeding together, each pointing at a different file for a different reason. Real overlap is ~15%.
+    >
+    > **22% of the finding's word count is not this repo's to edit.** `docs/wiki` is a submodule pointing at a separate Gitea *wiki* repo, concurrently editable through the web UI. `HUMANS.md`'s 1,413 words are out of scope for any change made here.
+    >
+    > **"Drop the classification table" would delete live rules.** The table has four rows; only Confidential and Restricted restate the bullets above it. **Public and Internal exist nowhere else in the file** — dropping it removes the only statement of `Internal | Operational data, anonymised logs | Enterprise AI tools only; not consumer/free-tier` from always-on agent context, in every project.
+    >
+    > **The 50-line target is arithmetically unreachable and contradicts the finding's own keep-list.** The file is 82 lines; the three named cuts total **16 lines** counting only their own content — the table rows (31–36, 6), the non-governance block (71–76, 6), the footer (79–82, 4) — landing at 66, or at most **23** if each cut also takes its heading, surrounding blanks and the `---` rules, landing at 59. Both include the table cut that shouldn't happen. Reaching 50 means cutting ~9–16 more from Hard Prohibitions (18 lines) or Required Behaviours (24), the operative rules the finding says to keep. **"Dedupe the constitution by about 20%" overstates by 4×** — verifiable duplication is **133 words (4.6%)**, in two adjacent principle pairs (§5 lines 114/117 byte-identical; §4 lines 89/92), both merge artifacts. §§1–10 are ten distinct domains with near-zero cross-section.
+    >
+    > **Any cut to `governance.md` is a global agent-behaviour change, not a docs edit.** Verified chain: `scripts/deploy-manifest.sh:21` maps `core:.claude/core`, and both `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` and the live `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` carry `@~/.claude/core/instructions/governance.md`. Repo and deployed copies are byte-identical (6,590 bytes). All 949 words are injected into every session in every project. Needs explicit sign-off on that basis.
+    >
+    > **Honest ceiling: 168 words / 17.7%** of the file's 949 — the cross-reference scaffolding only: preamble **43** (lines 3–5), non-governance block **77** (71–76), footer **48** (79–82), landing at ~67 lines with no rule loss. (An earlier revision said 47 for the preamble, which is only reachable by counting lines 1–7 — that sweeps in the `#` glyph and a `---` rule as words.) Plus 133 words from the constitution. Not 50 lines, not 20%.
+    >
+    > **Two defects the finding missed, both worth fixing independently of it.** (1) **A live bug: `docs/HUMANS.md` does not exist** — the file is `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md`. The wrong path appears **five times across three files**, including the **deployed** `core/instructions/governance.md:82`, which is self-inconsistent (line 73 correct, line 82 broken); the other four are `CONTROLS.md:5,101,106` and `ai-constitution.md:238`. (An earlier revision said "four times" while enumerating all five.) **Fixed (2026-09-15):** all five corrected to `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md`; the deployed copy under `~/.claude/` is now stale until `scripts/install.sh` re-runs. (2) The deployed always-on file carries **repo-relative pointers that dangle in every project but this one** — an agent told to "read it when making decisions not covered here" cannot. That is the substantive question this finding should have asked. The footer is additionally self-referential: `governance.md:80` lists the file as compatible with itself.
+
+28. **ADRs: 2,740 lines, 72% in eight ADRs over 150 lines.** ADR-0020 is 513 lines with a 71-line measurement log as Context; ADR-0017 has 173 lines of amendments against 45 of decision. ADR-0001 is superseded and ADR-0006 moot, both keeping full text below the banner. ADR-0002 is three lines. Truncate superseded ones to the banner, fold amendments into the decision, cap Context at 20 lines, add a 25-line `docs/adr/README.md` index with status. The rules already live in `gates.md`; the ADRs need only decision and consequences. Effort M.
+    > **Moved backwards (measured 2026-09-14 over `afa7187^`..`a6434e0`):** today's ADR-0024 work did the opposite of this finding on every axis, and that is recorded here so it is a known trade rather than a surprise. `docs/adr/` went from **23 files / 2,748 lines** to **24 / 3,084** — one new ADR (0024, 259 lines) plus amendment and banner text across **eleven existing ADRs** (0001, 0006, 0011, 0013, 0014, 0015, 0017, 0018, 0019, 0020, 0021 — 87 lines added, 10 removed, net **+77**), for a total of net **+336 lines (+12%)**. The two ADRs this finding names for truncation both grew *below* their banners instead: **ADR-0001 26 → 27** lines and **ADR-0006 22 → 27**, each gaining a fresh "as of ADR-0024" paragraph rather than losing the historical body beneath it. ADR-0017 gained a supersession banner while keeping its four amendments in full — the exact shape this finding proposes to fold.
+    >
+    > Not a defect in that work: a supersession has to be recorded somewhere, and an unread stale ADR is worse than a long one. But it does mean the finding's estimate is now conservative and its "truncate superseded ones to the banner" step has more to remove than when it was written — ADR-0001, ADR-0006 and ADR-0017 are all superseded-with-full-body today. **State the basis when re-measuring:** this is a two-SHA measurement, not a standing count, and further ADR amendments were being written by other sessions while it was taken. Re-derive with `git ls-tree -r --name-only <sha> docs/adr` before acting on it.
+    >
+    > **Verified (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`): as written this finding saves nothing and breaks citations in four files.** The size of the saving depends on a convention the finding never states. Truncating ADR-0001 and ADR-0006 to their banners removes **20 lines** if the `---` separator and its trailing blank are kept (13 + 7), or **24–26** if truncation drops those too, which is the natural edit (15–16 + 9–10). The proposed `docs/adr/README.md` index costs 25. So the range is **+5 to −1 lines** — the robust conclusion is that the proposal is a wash, not that it nets +5.
+    >
+    > **The finding's headline was accurately measured; it has since gone stale.** Current state is **3,118 lines / 24 files**. The 2,740 was correct at commit **`a3e721e`** (2026-09-09, "docs: retire the META.md guidance ADR-0022 overruled"), an ancestor of HEAD: `docs/adr/` there is exactly **2,740 lines across 23 files**, exactly **8** ADRs exceed 150 lines, the top-eight share is **71.90%** (1,970/2,740 — the finding says 72%), and **ADR-0020 is 513 lines**. Every headline figure reproduces at that one commit, which rules out coincidence, and across all 67 commits touching `docs/adr/` `a3e721e` is the **unique** one yielding 2,740 (neighbours: `ed8c99e` 2,732, `a3e721e` 2,740, `568ca74` 2,747, `af80d27` 2,748). What moved the numbers is the ADR-0024 wave, already recorded in the note above. Re-derive with `git show a3e721e:<path>` rather than assuming the figure was invented.
+    >
+    > Today those same figures read: **ten** ADRs exceed 150 lines, not eight; top-eight share is 68.3%, the over-150 cohort 79.2%. ADR-0020 is **514** lines. Its Context is **72** lines counting the `## Context` heading and **71** without — a counting convention, not drift: the section is byte-identical at `a3e721e` and at HEAD (`## Context` at :11 through `## Decision` at :83), so the finding's 71 and this note's 72 are the same span counted two ways. ADR-0017's "173 amendment lines against 45 of decision" and ADR-0002's three lines are exact.
+    >
+    > **"The rules already live in `gates.md`" is backwards.** `docs/spec/gates.md:349-352` explicitly *declines* to restate ADR-0020's numbers: *"they live in ADR-0020's Consequences section… Quoting them here would just create a second copy to go stale."* gates.md is a consumer of the ADR, not its replacement. **The index proposal also contradicts a recorded decision** — `docs/spec/architecture.md:90`: *"There is no index file — the directory holds numbered ADRs whose filenames state their decision, so `ls docs/adr/` is the index."*
+    >
+    > **No superseded body can be truncated — every one is quoted by content, not merely cited by number.** ADR-0001's body text is quoted verbatim at `docs/adr/0015:5,36`, and `factory-integration-decisions.md:133` lists "Pull-based distribution (ADR-0001)" as settled, a concept living only in its consequences bullets. ADR-0006's version-parity invariant is stated only at `0006:23` and is relied on by `0014:116` and `0024:183-185` — and its banner (17 lines) is already longer than its body (7). ADR-0017's own banner says its diagnosis "is still accurate about how Claude Code's installer works", and ADR-0024 cites its body in eight places. ADR-0002 is only partially superseded and is cited as a design source by a shipped skill.
+    >
+    > **Nothing in `tests/` or `.pre-commit-config.yaml` reads `docs/adr/`** — `grep -n "docs/adr" tests/test-adr0020-*.sh` returns nothing; the ADR-0020 gate family tests `skill-size-check.sh` and the embedded resolver copies. **Editing ADR prose breaks no gate.** The only constraint is citation integrity.
+    >
+    > **"Cap Context at 20 lines" would destroy a derivation three scripts depend on.** ADR-0020's Context pins base commit `f9b919d7e3b`, states the summation method and the token approximation, and derives the 2,770 gate from 7.22 chars/word × 20,000 — stating body-only vs whole-file explicitly *because conflating them is the defect the ADR exists to stop*. Only the four illustrative anecdotes (~42 lines) are trimmable, and those are the argument, not the measurement.
+    >
+    > **Honest ceiling ~235 lines (7.5%)**, and the one real win is not in the finding: **delete ADR-0017's four amendments (−173) now that ADR-0024 consequence 7 has restated them in full**, re-pointing eight citations. Plus ADR-0001/0006 compressed to banner-plus-one-line (−20) and ADR-0020's anecdotes (−42). No README index. Restate the headline as **79% in ten ADRs**.
+    >
+    > **The framing question this finding never notices:** it proposes reversing a convention the repo *just* re-affirmed — every banner added by the ADR-0024 work ends with some form of "kept below as the historical record". Is a superseded ADR's body a record or dead weight? Nothing here is mechanical; every proposed cut touches text another file quotes.
+
+29. [x] ~~**The same facts are stated in full three or four times.** "Edit `.apm/`, never the mirror": README (2 paragraphs), AGENTS.md (2 paragraphs), architecture.md (2 paragraphs plus the lost-README anecdote), ADR-0017. The apm.lock / SessionStart story: README (11 lines), AGENTS.md, ADR-0018, ADR-0019, gates.md. The offline `SKIP=` command and the three-stage install each appear three times. Rule: README has the how-to, AGENTS.md has one-line rules with links, architecture.md has mechanics. Effort S.~~
+    > **Corrected then partially done (2026-09-14):** independent re-verification found the "edit `.apm/`, never the mirror" and apm.lock/SessionStart clusters confirmed but the third overstated — no file documents an offline `SKIP=` command (the one `SKIP=`-adjacent mention in `gates.md` explicitly says a *different* opt-out "is not `SKIP=`"), and "three-stage install" appears twice, not three times, with no restatement worth trimming. Trimmed the two confirmed clusters: README's "Editing plugin content" and AGENTS.md's "Edit `.apm/`, never the flat mirror" sections cut to the how-to/one-line-plus-link split the finding itself proposed, full mechanics (the `rm -rf` behavior and the `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/README.md` anecdote) staying solely in `docs/spec/architecture.md`. README's "Keeping the install current" and AGENTS.md's apm.lock bullet trimmed to drop the restated `apm outdated`/`apm update --yes` timing narrative, pointing to ADR-0019 as the canonical mechanism instead. No test greps the trimmed wording (checked).
+
+30. [x] ~~**`LESSONS.md`: 41 entries, 2 graduated, about 12 stale.** Twelve entries from 2026-05-17 describe a write-skill / write-eval workflow whose skills no longer exist. One entry is open work labelled "Status: neither part landed". The longest eight are 200 to 550-word incident reports. Delete the stale entries, move open work to an issue, cap entries at about 60 words, target 100 lines. Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `629320b` on `docs/simplification-audit`. 255→131 lines, 41→30 entries. Kept 3 of the same-dated entries (RLHF defaults, secrets-rule gap, HITL gap) — judged unrelated to the defunct write-skill/write-eval workflow and still applicable, so 10 deleted rather than 12. The "neither part landed" open-work entry (CONTEXT.md not `@import`ed at session start) was removed rather than filed as an issue — full text preserved in this session's transcript if wanted later.
+
+31. [x] ~~**`CONTEXT.md`: 28 terms, most used only by gates.md, scripts, or tests rather than by skills;** two (Preload tax, Skill context contract) are never used outside `CONTEXT.md` and ADR-0020. The preload-tax entry quotes two dated numbers then says not to quote them. The example dialogue and flagged-ambiguities sections are grill residue. Cut to about 20 one-line terms. Effort S.~~
+    > **Corrected then done (2026-09-13):** see commits `124ce6e` and follow-up on `docs/simplification-audit`. Independent re-verification found "most used only by gates.md/scripts/tests" overstated: 13 of 28 terms are actually referenced from model-facing `references/*.md` files skills load in normal use (Routing target, Hand-invoked skill, Dispatch body, Near-miss, Thin adapter, Provenance chain, Output profile, apm package, Plugin marketplace, HITL, Skill composition, Delegation discipline, holocron) and were kept untouched. Only the 9 terms confirmed as true orphans were removed after a fresh independent grep: Content mirror, apm-consumed install, Vale audit prefilter, Vacuous green, Management Application, Sycophancy, HOTL, Preload tax, Skill context contract — 28 → 19 terms.
+    > **Re-counted (2026-09-14, at `a6434e0`): 18 terms, not 19.** The "28 → 19" above is an accurate record of this finding's own commit (`124ce6e`) and is left standing. `718c79a` then removed a twentieth-to-nineteenth entry this finding never touched: the standalone **Plugin** term, folded into **apm package** when ADR-0024 made "plugin" and "apm package" the same thing. Counted as bolded term entries between `## Language` and `## Relationships` in `CONTEXT.md`: 19 at `124ce6e`, 18 at `718c79a` and unchanged at `a6434e0`. The finding's own target ("about 20 one-line terms") is met either way. The preload-tax self-contradiction (quotes 23,427/10,478-char figures then says not to quote either) was confirmed verbatim and resolved by the entry's own deletion. The "example dialogue" and "flagged ambiguities" sections were found to be mandated by `grill-with-docs/references/context-format.md`'s template spec, not grill residue — left untouched, except one dangling bolded cross-reference to the now-deleted "Preload tax" term in a Flagged-ambiguities line, which was unbolded/de-referenced in place (the ambiguity resolution itself still holds without a defined glossary entry to point at).
+
+32. [x] ~~**Structure is described three ways** (README layout table, architecture.md plugin table, AGENTS.md structure bullets), and `VISION.md` carries a 35-line stack spec for a product that lives in another repo. One layout table in README; architecture.md keeps mechanics only; VISION drops the stack detail. Effort S.~~
+    > **Premise corrected, residual done (2026-09-14).** Both halves were inflated; most of the proposed split already existed.
+    >
+    > - **"Described three ways" overstates it.** `docs/spec/architecture.md` had already been differentiated, and says so in the file: its plugin table is prefaced "These are routing boundaries, not inventories — they answer 'where does a new skill go', so they deliberately do not enumerate what each plugin ships today… For what a plugin ships today, read `plugins/<name>/.apm/skills/` or the plugin list in `README.md`." That *is* the split this finding proposes, already implemented and self-documenting. README holds a path→contents table plus the six-plugin inventory; architecture.md holds a plugin→scope routing table that delegates inventory to README. `AGENTS.md`'s `## Structure` was **two bullets**, not a third description.
+    > - **"A 35-line stack spec" counted the wrong thing.** `docs/VISION.md` is **71 lines total**. The whole `## Long-term: Management Application` section is 35 lines; the stack detail inside it was **5 lines** (Stack, Stack rationale, Deployment, Hosting, Users).
+    >
+    > The one genuine duplicate was `AGENTS.md`'s `plugins/` bullet restating apm-install mechanics owned by `docs/spec/architecture.md:22` and `README.md:55`. Done: that section cut to two actionable one-liners plus pointers to the README layout table and architecture.md — keeping the load-bearing session rule (`.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/` are install output, never edit them), which finding 29's earlier trim had left the Structure bullet carrying implicitly. In `VISION.md`, the stack/framework/deployment lines were replaced with a one-line scope statement deferring those choices to that product's own repo, and the Phase 1 "Mobile/desktop (Phase 3)" line was dropped as an intra-file duplicate of the Phase 3 section. Net **6 lines** (`f91babc`: 2 files changed, 5 insertions, 11 deletions); README and architecture.md untouched, both already correct.
+
+## 6. Distribution, versioning, and session startup
+
+Not covered by the area audits above; found on a final sweep of the root config and install pipeline. The install pipeline itself (`scripts/install.sh` 55 lines, `deploy-manifest.sh` 24, statusline 109) is fine and needs nothing.
+
+33. **Every plugin version lives in four places (five for kyberforge), plus one per skill.** `plugins/<name>/apm.yml`, two generated `plugin.json` files, the root `apm.yml` packages list, the `executables.allow` key (`kyberforge#1.6.2`), and a `metadata.version` in all 39 SKILL.md files (ADR-0022) that nothing consumes and that drifts freely (gitea skills sit at five different values). Repo tags (`v2.0.1`) follow a third scheme that the declared `tagPattern: v{version}` can never match under `per_package` versioning. ADR-0006, ADR-0022, `check-executables-allow-sync`, `skill-frontmatter`, and `apm pack --check-versions` all exist to police this. Proposal: one version per plugin in its `apm.yml`; drop `metadata.version` and ADR-0022; let `apm pack` derive the rest. Effort M.
+    > **Partially advanced (2026-09-14):** see commit `718c79a` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Two of the four locations per plugin are gone: the twelve generated `plugin.json` manifests (`plugins/*/.claude-plugin/` and `plugins/*/.github/plugin/`) were deleted with the mirror. ADR-0006 needed no action — it was already moot and governed only those two now-deleted manifests, so no version bumps were required by the change. **Not closed.** Still outstanding: `plugins/<name>/apm.yml`, the root `apm.yml` packages list, the `executables.allow` pin, and `metadata.version` in all 39 SKILL.md files (still unconsumed, still drifting), plus ADR-0022 and the `v{version}` `tagPattern` mismatch.
+    > **Verified (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`): headline wrong, central claim inverted — and it contains the one zero-risk, empirically-verified win in this audit.**
+    >
+    > **Do this regardless of anything else: delete the six root `apm.yml` `packages[].version` lines.** Tested in an isolated scratch copy (repo untouched): setting `plugins/lint/apm.yml` to `9.9.9` while root says `1.1.7` **passes `apm pack --check-versions --check-clean` with exit 0**, reports `[matches]`, and emits `1.1.7` — the curator entry wins (`output_mappers.py:163-171`). Deleting the root `version:` line entirely leaves `marketplace.json` **byte-unchanged** (`builder._fetch_local_metadata` reads the plugin's own `apm.yml`). All six are removable with zero output diff. This is unpoliced duplication that silently ships the wrong number on drift. Effort S, no decision needed.
+    >
+    > Corrected headline: **two** hand-maintained per-plugin locations (**three** for kyberforge), not four — the audit's own "already done" note records the `plugin.json` deletion but never fixed the headline. Gitea skills drift across **six** values (`0.1.2, 0.1.3, 0.1.4, 0.1.5, 0.1.6, 1.0.1`), not five. 39 `SKILL.md` files ✓. The `0.4.6` duplication between root `version:` and `marketplace.version:` is **forced by apm, not a repo choice** — deleting `marketplace.version` makes `--check-clean` go dirty.
+    >
+    > **"Nothing consumes `metadata.version`" is false twice over.** Machine enforcers: `scripts/skill-size-check.sh:1365-1374` and `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh:1292-1332`, both FAIL tier, the latter citing ADR-0022 by name, with four dedicated bats cases and ~10 fixture generators baking the field in. Instruction-level consumers: `skill-author/SKILL.md:60` (bump minor on create, patch on improve), `create.md:89,101`, `improve.md:82`, and `forge/SKILL.md:54` + `references/version-bump.md`. apm parses it for Chatmode/Instruction/Context primitives but not for Skills, and never emits it. Precise statement: the value is written, shape-validated, and never read *downstream* — it is an agent-visible revision counter, and the drift table shows the counter is not being maintained.
+    >
+    > **ADR-0022 already considered and rejected dropping the field**, on the grounds that `skill-author` depends on it to decide whether a pass owes a bump — a rationale still live today. Superseding costs: rewrite skill-author's bump rule, delete `forge`'s version-bump route premise, strip two scripts, delete four bats cases, fix ~10 fixture generators, edit the scaffold template, update `gates.md:97` — and re-open the "is this field present here?" question issue #127 closed, just from the other side. **Recommendation: keep it and fix the actual defect, which is that nobody bumps it.** Either enforce the bump in the skill-author workflow or declare the values advisory in the ADR.
+    >
+    > **The `tagPattern` claim is refuted — inert, not broken.** Under `versioning.strategy: per_package`, apm never reads it: `version_check.py:262` gates on `strategy == "tag_pattern"`, and `builder.py:641,781` are reachable only for *remote* source entries, while all six packages here are local paths. The `v1.0.0`/`v2.0.0`/`v2.0.1` tags are not "a third scheme" — they are the `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` external-consumer contract tags from finding 36, a different axis entirely. Latent risk only: if `dependencies.apm` ever gains `ref:` pins, tagPattern goes live against per-package tags that do not exist.
+    >
+    > Also: **`executables.allow` should be kept** — it is version-keyed by apm's design and `check-executables-allow-sync` guards a real silent failure (ADR-0019). And ADR-0006's ADR-0024 amendment asserting *"`apm.yml`'s `version:` is the only version field a plugin has"* is inaccurate while root `packages[].version` exists — fixed by the deletion above.
+
+34. **The SessionStart hook auto-updates the install on every startup.** `check-apm-current.sh` runs `apm outdated` (network, 60 s timeout) and then `apm update --yes` (300 s timeout) at every session start, rewriting `apm.lock.yaml`. That is why the lock file is dirty at the start of this session and why `AGENTS.md` has to explain "commit or discard it deliberately". It is a 60-line script with a 368-line test, an ADR (0019), the `executables.allow` pin, and a sync hook behind it. For a repo that is its own source, the update belongs in `install.sh` or a manual `apm update`, not in session startup. Effort S to remove; the design question is whether auto-update at startup is wanted at all.
+    > **Refuted (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`). The evidence is inverted: the finding cites as proof of over-eagerness a session in which the mechanism did not fire, and the observed state is the exact silent failure ADR-0019 exists to prevent.**
+    >
+    > **The update is conditional, not unconditional.** `check-apm-current.sh:42-43` captures `apm outdated` and `exit 0`s unless the output matches `outdated dependenc(y|ies) found`. The staleness test is a real SHA comparison (`apm_cli/commands/outdated.py`, git-branch branch) of the lockfile's `resolved_commit` against the remote tip. On a current install the cost is one **~0.8 s** check and **no lock rewrite** — confirmed by timed probe. `hooks.json` also declares `"matcher": "startup"` only, so `--resume`/`--continue`/post-compact sessions never fire it (ADR-0019 sub-decision 3).
+    >
+    > **"That is why the lock file is dirty at the start of this session" is false.** The session-start `git status` reads `(clean)` and `apm.lock.yaml` was unmodified. Meanwhile `apm outdated` reports **6 outdated dependencies — the install sits 9 commits behind `main`**, right now, with nothing reporting it. The hook did not run.
+    >
+    > **ADR-0019 pre-answers the finding's core argument**, Context ¶3: *"Refreshing on push assumes the person who pushes is the person who goes stale, which is backwards: your install goes stale when someone else merges, and a push of your own is neither necessary nor sufficient for it to have happened."* "For a repo that is its own source" conflates authoring source with installed content — under ADR-0018 this repo consumes its own plugins as unpinned git refs against the remote default branch, so a session loads `main`, never the working tree (AGENTS.md states this). Being its own source makes it *more* exposed, not less: it is the only consumer whose authors routinely hold uninstalled edits and may assume they are live. The ADR also pre-rejects a manual `apm update` (sub-decision 1), accepting the dirty-lock cost deliberately — the AGENTS.md line the finding reads as evidence of a problem is the ADR's documented consequence.
+    >
+    > **`scripts/install.sh` has no apm step at all** — it installs git hooks and deploys `providers/claude-code/`, and runs once at setup, so it structurally cannot address staleness caused by someone else merging later. The proposed destination does not exist. Footprint is also understated: six files, 1,096 lines. And the claimed saving largely evaporates — deleting the `executables.allow` block turns apm's trust gate **off** for all six packages, a security regression ADR-0019 deliberately closed, so it must be retained in some form and `check-executables-allow-sync` (222 + 243) only becomes droppable if reduced to a non-version-keyed form.
+    >
+    > **Recommendation: keep the hook.** Cost is 0.8 s on a current install; offline it fails fast (0.81 s, status `unknown`, grep misses, exit 0 — the 60 s timeout is a bound, not a latency). The benefit guards a failure that is silent by construction and that the repo is exhibiting right now.
+    >
+    > **Two things worth fixing, neither of which is removal.** (1) ADR-0019's ~10.4 s refresh figure is now **~18 s** measured warm on a LAN remote — it is quoted in the `timeout: 380` invariant reasoning and understates by 75%. (2) **An undocumented branch hazard, and the strongest argument the finding could have made:** the hook resolves against the remote *default* branch, so on a feature branch that changes `plugins/`, an auto-refresh reinstalls `main`'s version over it. Reproduced — running `apm update` today re-installs `main`'s `plugins/bin/.mcp.json` and writes back the obsidian MCP server that commit `c96ca9c` removed on this branch. That deserves a line in ADR-0019's Consequences; the proportionate fix if it bites is ~3 lines skipping the refresh when `HEAD` is not the default branch.
+
+35. [x] ~~**Outputs and packages for consumers that do not exist.** The `codex` output profile generates `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (95 lines) although Codex is not a supported consumer. The `mattpocock-skills` remote package entry is the only reason `apm-marketplace-check` needs the network, and its pin is advanced by hand (ADR-0015). The `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` mirror is a legacy path (finding 2). Removing all three leaves one generated marketplace manifest (the per-plugin `plugin.json` pairs remain) and no network-dependent hook. Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-13):** see commit `568ca74` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Removed the `codex` output profile from root `apm.yml` and its compiled `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (95 lines), and the `mattpocock-skills` remote package entry — the only remote marketplace entry, so `apm-marketplace-check` and `apm-pack-check-clean` no longer need network access at all. Updated `README.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `docs/spec/gates.md`, and `docs/spec/architecture.md` accordingly; added one-line superseded/updated notes to ADR-0015 and ADR-0021. Left `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` untouched — that's the Copilot legacy-path question in finding 2/§8, out of scope here; only re-ran the sync script to keep it consistent. `apm.lock.yaml` unaffected (`marketplace.packages[]` isn't part of the lockfile). Verified via `apm install`, `apm pack --marketplace=claude --check-versions`, and all four affected pre-push hooks.
+    > **Both carve-outs overtaken the next day (2026-09-14, verified at `a6434e0`):** neither survives, and the finding's headline outcome — "one generated marketplace manifest, no network-dependent hook" — is now literally true rather than approximately so.
+    >
+    > - **"The per-plugin `plugin.json` pairs remain"** is void. All twelve were deleted in `718c79a` (ADR-0024); `git ls-files '*plugin.json'` returns nothing. The only tracked manifest left anywhere is the root `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. (The root `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` beside it is untracked local `apm pack` output, ignored at `.gitignore:59`.)
+    > - **"Left `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` untouched … out of scope here"** is void the same day: `0dffff3` deleted it under finding 2c, along with `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` and its test. The "only re-ran the sync script to keep it consistent" step above refers to `sync-plugin-content.sh`, itself deleted in `718c79a`.
+
+36. **The release-tag mechanism guards an external contract with no known consumer.** `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` exports three hooks for other repos to pin by `rev: <tag>`. `check-release-needed` (242 lines + 442 test), `test-vale-hooks-consumer` (270 lines), ADR-0014, and three tags exist to serve that. If no other repo pins these hooks today, the whole mechanism can be deferred until one does. Effort S.
+    > **Verified (2026-09-14, at HEAD `062ca47`): premise holds — the only premise in this audit to survive verification, though not the finding whole: `test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` is 272 lines, not 270. Not yet decided; deferred by the human on 2026-09-14.**
+    >
+    > Exact: three exported hooks (`kyberforge-vale-audit-skill`, `kyberforge-vale-audit-agent`, `kyberforge-skill-size-check`), `check-release-needed.sh` 242, its test 442, three tags (`v1.0.0`, `v2.0.0`, `v2.0.1`). `test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` is **272** lines, not 270.
+    >
+    > **Consumer evidence: none found, near-conclusive for this instance.** The Gitea instance holds exactly two repos; the other (`Defame1297/ansible-homelab-mono`) pins seven hook repos in its `.pre-commit-config.yaml` — conventional-pre-commit, gitleaks, jumanjihouse, yamllint, ansible-lint, pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks, plus `local` and `meta` — **none referencing this repo or any of the three hook ids**. All 13 commits touching the mechanism are self-authored fixes found by this repo's own tests; none traces to a reported external breakage. `test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` builds a synthetic consumer in `mktemp` — a genuine regression test that caught a genuine shipped bug (`LESSONS.md:101`), simulating nobody who exists. Off-instance clones remain undeterminable. **ADR-0024 already ruled this standard sufficient** four commits earlier, deleting the 20,000-line mirror as "maintained for an audience of zero".
+    >
+    > **The README documents a contradictory contract** — "For external consumers" says consume through apm, "apm is the only supported install path", and never mentions `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` or `rev:` pinning.
+    >
+    > **The mechanism is already failing at its one job.** `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` changed on `origin/main` in `598a7c3` after `v2.0.1`, with no tag cut since — a consumer pinning `rev: v2.0.1` gets a stale hook today. The gate cannot fire: it is wholly gated on `PRE_COMMIT_REMOTE_BRANCH == refs/heads/main`, and PRs merge through Gitea's server-side button, which sets nothing. The script's own header documents this as needing "a server-side CI job, which this repo does not have yet".
+    >
+    > **The premise that it serves only the external contract holds** — all three exported hooks are *separately* wired internally via `repo: local` (`.pre-commit-config.yaml:216,249,258`), so deleting the export costs **zero** internal lint coverage.
+    >
+    > **Correction to the finding: ADR-0014 gets amended, not retired.** Its primary decision — moving Vale config/styles/wrapper into `skill-audit/assets/vale/` and `agent-audit/assets/vale/`, self-locating from `${BASH_SOURCE[0]}` so the prefilter works at *runtime* in any repo installing kyberforge — is independent of the release-tag mechanism and stands on its own. Only the `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` half and the tag consequence retire.
+    >
+    > Removal is ~1,000 lines and mechanical: `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml`, `check-release-needed.sh`, both tests, the hook block at `.pre-commit-config.yaml:194-201`, the `gates.md:83` row and its "External consumers" section. Tags are inert and can stay. **The one real loss:** `test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` is the sole test exercising the entry-resolution path that once shipped broken — it goes only *with* the manifest, never while it stays. Reversal cost is bounded provided ADR-0014 and `LESSONS.md:101,105` are kept: they preserve the `entry[0]`-only constraint that took three review rounds to find.
+
+37. [x] ~~**Two `.mcp.json` files declare an Obsidian vault server over `docs/`** (root and `plugins/bin/`; the other five plugin `.mcp.json` files are empty stubs), while `AGENTS.md` forbids using an external memory system for this repo. If the Obsidian tools are unused, drop both and the `reinject_mcp_servers` explanation in the bin README; the bin `plugin.json` pair regenerates. Effort S.~~
+    > **Not proceeding (2026-09-13):** premise doesn't hold. The server exposes the repo's own git-tracked `docs/` folder — not an external/off-repo store — so it isn't the "external memory system" AGENTS.md's rule targets. It was deliberately added and versioned (3 commits), is documented as current intended behavior in both READMEs, and ADR-0018 uses it as its only concrete worked example of apm's MCP-dependency propagation mechanism actually working. No skill invokes the Obsidian tools as a workflow step, but that alone doesn't make the config dead. No changes made; recommend a human confirm whether the vault tooling is still wanted before removing it.
+    > **Confirmed and done (2026-09-14):** the human confirmed the vault tooling is not wanted — remove it entirely. All seven `.mcp.json` files deleted (the six plugin-root files and the repo-root one), and the repo-root path added to `.gitignore` so a local `apm` run cannot recreate it as tracked content. The bin README's `reinject_mcp_servers` explanation goes with it; the `plugin.json` pair the finding expected to regenerate no longer exists (deleted in `718c79a`, finding 7).
+    >
+    > What made this urgent is the substantive discovery, not the tidying: **deleting the per-plugin `plugin.json` manifests in `718c79a` had already broken MCP propagation silently.** `apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py` maps a plugin-root `.mcp.json` → `.apm/.mcp.json`, and that code path runs only for *marketplace* plugins — with no manifest, apm never reads the file. `plugins/bin/apm.yml` declares `dependencies.mcp: []`, so the supported mechanism was never used either. Proved on ref-pinned consumer clones: at the parent commit a consumer gets an `obsidian` server, at HEAD it gets none, and on upgrade apm prints `Removed stale MCP server 'obsidian' from .mcp.json` — which would in time have stripped the server from this repo's own tracked `.mcp.json` once the lock re-resolved. Deleting the files makes the intent match the behaviour instead of leaving a config that silently does nothing.
+
+38. [x] ~~**`pc-author` / `pc-run` (689 lines) carry generic pre-commit documentation.** `hooks-by-language.md` (128 lines) and `failure-patterns.md` (133) restate pre-commit.com. Keep the skills, trim to the house-specific rules. Effort S.~~
+    > **Corrected then done (2026-09-13):** see commit `a622200` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Independent re-verification found the 689-line figure overstated (actual combined size 598 lines) and the realistic cut smaller than a rewrite (~60-85 lines, concentrated in the two named reference files, not the SKILL.md files or the four short flow files, which are house-specific gates rather than restatement). Landed within that range: `hooks-by-language.md` 128 → 92 lines (collapsed six per-language tables repeating the same repo/rev/rationale into one shared-repo table plus a small other-repos table); `failure-patterns.md` 133 → 109 lines (removed generic SSH/proxy and shellcheck SC-code restatement, compressed generic schema-error bullets). Kept verbatim: both "Unverified — not in research corpus" flags, the rev-freshness caveat, the `rtk git add -u`/`rtk git commit` fix (ADR-0023), and the `pre-commit install -f` warning. Combined cut: 60 lines. Flat mirror regenerated and verified byte-identical.
+
+## 7. Suggested order
+
+1. Quick wins, all S, no design decisions needed: findings 9, 10, 26, 30, 31, 29, 12, 13, 1, 6, 4, 35, 37, 38, and the mirror-sync and executables-allow halves of 2. Removes roughly 25,000 to 30,000 lines and 6 hooks.
+2. Structural changes that need a short discussion: 14, 15, 19, 20, 23, 25, 17, 3, 5, 7, 33, 34, 36.
+3. The real complexity: 16 (validators), 11 (provenance), 24 (core), 8 and 28 (gates.md and ADRs).
+
+Findings 9, 10, 11, and 12 are coupled through the provenance validator and the audit criteria; land them together or the audit gates start reporting the removals.
+
+## 8. Questions to settle before starting
+
+- [x] ~~**Native Claude Code marketplace install vs apm-only.** The flat mirror, `check-plugin-content-sync`, and ADR-0017 exist only for native `claude plugin install`. If apm install is the only supported path, the mirror and its 2,100 lines of tooling go away. Which install paths must work for consumers?~~
+  > **Answered (2026-09-14):** apm-only. See ADR-0024 (`docs/adr/0024-apm-is-the-only-supported-install-path.md`) and commit `718c79a` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Native `claude plugin install` support is dropped; the flat mirror, the twelve per-plugin manifests, `sync-plugin-content.sh`, its test suite, `lib/marketplace-plugins.sh`, and the `check-plugin-content-sync` and `validate-plugins` hooks are all deleted (245 files changed, −22,602 lines). ADR-0017 carries a superseded banner. Kept deliberately: the root `marketplace:` block and the root `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, which apm's own consumers read. (`marketplace.json` is the only tracked file under `.claude-plugin/`; the root `plugin.json` beside it is untracked local `apm pack` output, ignored at `.gitignore:59`.) This answer is what voided finding 7's recommendation and closed §3's `check-plugin-content-sync` target.
+- [x] ~~**Copilot CLI legacy path.** Is `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` still read by any Copilot version you target? If not, finding 2c is a pure delete.~~
+  > **Answered (2026-09-14):** yes, but only as a preferred path, not a required one — so the delete holds. Settled under finding 2c above and executed in commit `0dffff3`; this bullet was left open by oversight when that finding closed. Copilot CLI falls through `marketplace.json`, `.plugin/marketplace.json`, `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` in order, and the `.claude-plugin/` file apm already emits satisfies the last step. ~~What was lost is discovery-order preference, not Copilot consumability.~~
+  >
+  > **Corrected (2026-09-14, later the same day, verified at `a6434e0`):** "not Copilot consumability" no longer holds. It was true at `0dffff3`; `718c79a` (ADR-0024) then removed native install support for **both** hosts, and Copilot consumability went with it. The fallback still resolves — that part stands — but it now resolves to a catalogue of six packages whose roots contain no content: `ls plugins/*/` shows `.apm/`, `apm.yml`, `docs/` and a README, and `plugins/*/skills`, `.../agents`, `.../hooks` do not exist at all.
+  >
+  > **The mechanism is host-independent, which is why this bullet had to change.** ADR-0024 consequence 1 and §9's first residual both state it for Claude Code: a native registration succeeds and installs six plugins containing zero skills, silently. Nothing in that chain is Claude-specific. The catalogue is a list of plugin *roots*; discovery of content inside a root is a convention-scan of flat `skills/`/`agents/`/`hooks/` directories, and that is the layout `718c79a` deleted. Whichever of the four paths a host resolves the catalogue through, it lands on the same empty roots. Copilot was in fact always the weaker case — ADR-0017's own `hooks` amendment records that the mirror only ever partially served it.
+  >
+  > **The delete still holds**, for a stronger reason than the one given: the file was a preferred discovery path to content that no longer exists. What changed is the accepted cost — this is no longer "preference lost", it is the same accepted silent-empty-install residual §9 records, now known to apply to Copilot as well.
+- **Provenance chain.** Is "which upstream informed this file" a requirement you still want, or was it a governance experiment? Finding 11 hinges on this.
+  > **Sharpened (2026-09-14):** still open, but ask it of the **producer** first. `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/research/` specifies the `sources.md` + `source_keys:` format and three evals in `plugins/bin/evals/research/research/eval.yaml` assert it. If `research` keeps emitting the chain, finding 11 collapses to "delete the validators" and the metadata stays. See finding 11's verification note.
+- **ADR-0012 (three core skills) and the one-script-per-skill install constraint.** ~~The merges in 14, 15, and 24 need the first revisited and are the only way around the second.~~ **Corrected (2026-09-14):** this grouping was wrong, and finding 2b's note has said so since `0dffff3` while this bullet said the opposite. ADR-0012 governs only the `core` plugin's three `agentsmd-*` skills (`agentsmd-author`, `agentsmd-audit`, `provider-adapter-author`) — read it: it names those three and nothing else. **Only finding 24 touches them, so only finding 24 needs ADR-0012 revisited.** Findings 14 and 15 merge kyberforge's `skill-audit`/`agent-audit` and `skill-author`/`agent-author`, which ADR-0012 does not govern; what constrains them is the self-containment rule, and merging is the way *around* it rather than a reason to reverse anything. That rule survives ADR-0024 — see §9's negative result and ADR-0024 consequence 6, which also correct its source: it is the agentskills.io spec for APM package mode, not a property of Claude Code's plugin cache-install as finding 2b's note assumed. The open question for 14/15 is a design one — one `description` carrying both skills' trigger phrases — not an ADR supersession. Are you open to superseding ADR-0012, for finding 24?
+  > **Moot (2026-09-14):** finding 24 is refuted on arithmetic before this question is reached — the three `core` bodies total 1,360 words against `BODY_MAX_WORDS=900`, and their descriptions 806 chars against a 400 cap. Nothing needs superseding because the merge it would unblock cannot be committed. Question closed unless finding 24 is rewritten.
+- **Granularity of git/gitea skills.** One `git` skill vs seven trades routing precision for size. Is one broad description acceptable?
+  > **Answered by measurement (2026-09-14): no, and it is not a preference question.** A merged git description measures **1,950 chars against a 400-char FAIL ceiling (4.9×)** and a 3,381-word body against 900 (3.8×). Both proposed gitea halves also FAIL at 2.5×, and the gitea split additionally puts a hard boundary through the edit-a-file-then-open-a-PR workflow. (An earlier revision also called the gitea split "blocked by ADR-0011, which already rejected a *smaller* bundling" — withdrawn; ADR-0011's objection is to a boundary being crossed, not to bundle size. See finding 20's verification note.)
+- **Auto-update at session start.** Do you want the install refreshed from the remote every time a session opens (finding 34), or is a manual `apm update` acceptable?
+  > **Recommendation on evidence (2026-09-14): keep it; finding 34 refuted.** The premise that it runs on every startup is false (the update is conditional on a real SHA check), the lock was not dirty, the hook did not fire this session, and the install is currently **9 commits behind `main` with nothing reporting it** — the failure the hook exists to prevent. `install.sh`, the proposed alternative host, has no apm step. Still formally the human's call, but the factual basis for removing it does not survive. See finding 34.
+- **External hook consumers.** Does any other repo pin this repo's `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` by tag today? If not, finding 36 defers the release mechanism entirely.
+  > **Evidence gathered, decision deferred (2026-09-14).** No consumer found: the Gitea instance holds two repos, and the other pins seven hook repos, none of them this one. No consumer-driven commit in the 13 touching the mechanism. Off-instance clones undeterminable — but ADR-0024 accepted exactly this standard when it deleted the mirror. The mechanism is additionally **already broken** (a consumer pinning `rev: v2.0.1` gets a stale `skill-size-check.sh`, and the guard cannot fire through Gitea's merge button). The human deferred the decision on 2026-09-14; the finding is ready to execute when it is taken. See finding 36.
+- [x] ~~**Obsidian MCP.** Are the Obsidian tools over `docs/` used by anyone? If not, finding 37 is a pure delete.~~
+  > **Answered (2026-09-14):** not used — remove entirely. All seven `.mcp.json` files are deleted and the repo-root path is gitignored; see finding 37, which also records the functional regression this uncovered (since `718c79a` deleted the per-plugin manifests, apm no longer propagated the server to consumers at all).
+
+## 9. Carried forward from the apm-only decision (2026-09-14)
+
+Recorded here so they are not rediscovered as defects. All follow from commit `718c79a` / ADR-0024.
+
+**Two accepted residuals.**
+
+- **Native install still half-works, and cannot be prevented.** apm reuses Claude's catalogue format by design, so a Claude Code user can still register holocron natively and will install six plugins containing zero skills. Accepted, not overlooked: no schema change closes this, because the format that makes it possible is the format apm's own consumers need.
+- **Consumers now receive test fixtures.** apm installs from `.apm/`, which carries the `tests/` directories the mirror used to strip, so a consumer installing from this branch receives **10 `.bats` files across 6 skills**, plus those skills' 6 `tests/README.md` files — 16 files. (Repo-wide, 17 tracked paths contain `/tests/`: the 10 `.bats` and 7 `README.md`, one of which is a template asset under `skill-author/assets/templates/tests/` and is not a test fixture.) This is what consumers *receive*, not what this checkout shows: `.claude/skills/` here currently holds zero `.bats` files, because that deployed tree is stale and predates this branch. The mechanism was confirmed empirically on a ref-pinned consumer clone — the 16 files are absent at the parent commit and present at HEAD. Suppressing them means switching all six `apm.yml` files from `includes: auto` to explicit lists, where a wrong list silently drops content — worse failure mode than the noise. Deferred deliberately.
+
+**Negative result — do not re-litigate.** Deleting native install does *not* relax the self-containment constraint. `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/references/deployment-modes.md`, sourced from the agentskills.io spec, states it independently for APM package mode: the spec defines no cross-skill sharing. So findings 14 and 15 still require *merging* skills; sharing one file between two skills remains impossible, and §8's "one-script-per-skill install constraint" bullet is unchanged by this decision.
+
+**Accepted gap — symlinks under `.apm/`.** ADR-0017's `check_apm_symlinks()` was the only thing reporting that symlinks under `.apm/` do not survive to a consumer. It is gone, and no replacement guard is being added — the human decided to accept the gap.
+
+The mechanism is not the bundle exporter, as ADR-0017 assumed; it is the **install** path, and it has since been verified. `apm_cli/security/gate.py`'s `ignore_non_content()` is a `shutil.copytree` ignore callback whose docstring says "Excludes symlinks (security)"; it is used at `apm_cli/integration/skill_integrator.py:424`, `:791` and `:1152`. Materialization into `apm_modules/` dereferences first, so symlinked content survives *there* and is dropped when skills are deployed out of it. ADR-0024 flagged the prediction as unverified; it holds, with that corrected attribution. No symlinks exist under any `.apm/` today, so nothing is broken now — but the next one added there will silently not reach consumers, and nothing will say so.
+
+## 10. Verification wave (2026-09-14)
+
+Ten open findings with claimed yield — 11, 16, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28, 33, 34, 36 — were each re-checked against the files by an independent read-only agent, at HEAD `062ca47`. Findings 14 and 15 were deliberately excluded: their blocker is a design decision, not a premise. Results are recorded in each finding's own note above.
+
+**Read this section before acting on any remaining finding.**
+
+### Why the wave was run
+
+This audit was written read-only, and its scope estimates are systematically optimistic. Before the wave, ten findings had been examined closely in the course of implementing them: 3, 19 and 37 each cost a full agent run to conclude "premise doesn't hold", and 2d, 29, 31 and 38 each needed correcting mid-implementation. Findings 5, 18 and 32 were then examined during a grill on 2026-09-14 and all three collapsed — 18's four examples were three different classes of load-bearing content, 5's suites turned out to be split by failure class rather than ADR section, and 32's proposed split already existed and was self-documenting in `architecture.md`.
+
+That base rate made "effort S, no decisions needed" an unreliable signal, and §7's bucket 1 an unreliable plan. **Dispatching implementation agents against unverified premises costs more than verifying first.**
+
+### Outcome
+
+| Finding | Verdict | Verified yield |
+|---|---|---|
+| 36 | **Premise holds** — the only one whose premise survived; one supporting figure wrong (272 lines, not 270) | ~1,000 lines |
+| 33 | Headline wrong; one item empirically verified zero-risk | **6 lines, zero output diff** |
+| 28 | Headline accurate when measured (`a3e721e`), now stale; as written it is a wash (+5 to −1 lines); real win is elsewhere | ~235 lines |
+| 22 | Percentages 3–4× inflated, wrong target set; better defect found | ~150–180 lines |
+| 20 | Refuted — git 7→1 is 4.9× the description FAIL ceiling | ~230 lines salvage |
+| 27 | Refuted — audience separation misread as duplication | ~168 words + a live bug |
+| 11 | Direction defensible, two scope figures wrong; blocked on a decision it never poses | ~6,393 if unblocked |
+| 16 | Refuted — its only safe saving belongs to finding 14 | 0 independent |
+| 24 | Refuted — arithmetically impossible (1,360w vs a 900 cap) | 0 |
+| 34 | Refuted — evidence inverted | 0 |
+
+**One premise of ten survived — finding 36's — but not the finding whole: its supporting figure was wrong (`test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` is 272 lines, not 270). The other nine premises failed.**
+
+**The headline figure was wrong in at most eight of the ten, not all ten.** Two exceptions, stated so the claim is not overstated:
+
+- **Finding 36 states no headline figure.** Its headline is a claim — "the release-tag mechanism guards an external contract with no known consumer" — and the numbers appear only in a supporting sentence.
+- **Finding 34's stated figures are exact.** "A 60-line script with a 368-line test" checks out at both ends (`plugins/kyberforge/.apm/hooks/check-apm-current.sh` 60, `tests/test-apm-current-hook.sh` 368). Its note's only figure correction runs the *other* way — the footprint is **understated** at six files / 1,096 lines. What is refuted in 34 is the mechanism claim ("on every startup"), not an arithmetic error.
+
+Three findings (16, 24, 34) are refuted outright; two (22, 28) contain a real finding different from the one written. Finding 28 is the one case where the headline was *accurately measured and went stale*: 2,740 lines / 72% in eight ADRs is exact at `a3e721e`, and the ADR-0024 wave moved it afterwards.
+
+The recurring failure mode is worth naming, because it has now produced six wrong findings (3, 5, 16, 22, 24, and by implication 28): **dense validator and test code with heavy comments reads as over-engineering when skimmed, and turns out to be regression coverage whose comments name the incident.** Findings 16 and 24 propose reverting validators to sizes whose defects are on the commit record. Before proposing to cut any script or suite in this repo, read its header.
+
+**Where the real remaining opportunity is:** finding 14 (merge `skill-audit` + `agent-audit`) at **−1,587 lines with zero coverage loss**, which is also where finding 16's savings actually live. Its blocker is the design question in §8 — one `description` carrying both skills' trigger phrases — not an ADR supersession.
+
+### Two defects to fix independently of any finding
+
+- **~~A live bug in always-on context.~~ Fixed (2026-09-15).** The deployed `core/instructions/governance.md` cited `docs/HUMANS.md`, which does not exist — the file is `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md`. Five occurrences across three files (`governance.md:82`, which was self-inconsistent against its own correct line 73; `CONTROLS.md:5,101,106`; `ai-constitution.md:238`), in a file `@`-imported into every session in every project. All five now point at `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md`. Note the deployed copy under `~/.claude/` no longer matches the repo until `scripts/install.sh` re-runs.
+- **This checkout's install is stale and there is a branch hazard.** At the time of the wave `apm outdated` reported 6 outdated dependencies, 9 commits behind `main`, with a clean tree and nothing reporting it. **Do not run `apm update` on this branch** — it resolves against `main` and restores the obsidian MCP server that commit `c96ca9c` removed here. Reproduced. The mechanism is worse than "reinstalls `plugins/bin/.mcp.json`": apm never writes into `plugins/`, it re-materialises the file under `apm_modules/` and regenerates the repo-root `/.mcp.json` — which `c96ca9c` gitignored, so the restoration would not appear in `git status` at all. This belongs in ADR-0019's Consequences; see finding 34.

apm.yml

@@ -64,13 +64,11 @@ marketplace:
 
   # Output targets (map form). Each output writes to its profile default
   # path; add 'path:' under a key to override.
-  # 'codex' requires every package below to declare 'category:' (satisfied).
   outputs:
     claude: {}
-    codex: {}
 
-  # CI tip: build one or all formats with a machine-readable manifest:
-  #   apm pack --marketplace=claude,codex --json | jq -r '.marketplace.outputs[].path'
+  # CI tip: build a machine-readable manifest:
+  #   apm pack --marketplace=claude --json | jq -r '.marketplace.outputs[].path'
 
   versioning:
     strategy: per_package
@@ -106,12 +104,6 @@ marketplace:
       version: 1.1.2
       category: Productivity
 
-    - name: mattpocock-skills
-      description: Skills for Real Engineers — planning, TDD, architecture, and debugging workflows from Matt Pocock's .claude directory.
-      source: mattpocock/skills
-      version: "1.2.3"
-      category: Productivity
-
     - name: lint
       description: Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.
       source: ./plugins/lint

core/instructions/governance.md

@@ -79,4 +79,4 @@ The deterministic enforcement layer — pre-commit hooks, CI gates, scanner conf
 *Derived from AI Constitution v1.1 — May 2026. Update this file when the constitution is updated.*
 *Compatible with: governance.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .cursor/rules/*.mdc*
 *One source of truth. Do not copy-paste into tool-specific files — reference this file from thin adapters.*
-*Counterparts: `docs/HUMANS.md` (human practitioner rules) | `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md` (deterministic enforcement)*
+*Counterparts: `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` (human practitioner rules) | `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md` (deterministic enforcement)*

docs/VISION.md

@@ -48,18 +48,10 @@ Browse, edit, and configure AI development config through a proper product UI.
 
 **Design principle:** This is a product, not a file browser. Users never see git operations, file paths, or commit messages. The UI presents domain concepts (skills, workflows, agents, providers) and handles persistence silently. Any feature that exposes git internals to the user is out of scope.
 
-**Architecture:**
-- Stack: React + TypeScript + Vite (frontend), Node.js + Fastify + TypeScript (backend), PostgreSQL (introduced only when a specific feature requires state with no natural home in git)
-- Stack rationale: single language across the full stack keeps the codebase navigable for junior developers and AI coding agents; TypeScript's explicit types make intent clear without comments; React → React Native is the cleanest path to mobile in Phase 3; `simple-git` covers all required git operations without needing a Python backend
-- Git operations via `simple-git`; git repo stays the source of truth
-- Deployment: Docker (Nginx + Node containers), k8s-ready
-- Hosting: self-hosted first, cloud-hosted option later
-- Users: solo-first, multi-user-ready data model from day one
+**Scope:** self-hosted first, cloud-hosted option later; solo-first, with a multi-user-ready data model from day one. The git repo stays the source of truth. Stack, framework and deployment choices belong to that product's own repo, not here.
 
 **Start trigger:** when the plugin content model and sync tooling are stable. Full content model must be stable before building a UI over it.
 
-**Mobile/desktop (Phase 3):** React → React Native for mobile; Tauri to wrap the web app for desktop.
-
 ### Phase 2 — Agent & Fleet Management
 
 Runtime orchestration: push config updates to machines, see running agents, manage task queues and outputs across a fleet of machines and projects.

docs/adr/0001-skills-in-agents-dir.md

@@ -5,9 +5,10 @@ as this repo's authoring source of truth) and, for plugin-scope agent files spec
 ADR-0016 (plugin-scope `.apm/agents/*.agent.md` drops provider-specific fields). Since issue
 #90's conversion executed, plugin content is authored under `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` +
 `.apm/{skills,agents,hooks}/` — not the flat `skills/`/`agents/` layout this ADR describes —
-and `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`/`.github/plugin/plugin.json` are compiled output of `apm pack`,
-not hand-authored. This ADR's content is kept below as the historical record of the
-pre-APM decision; it is no longer the current model.
+and `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`/`.github/plugin/plugin.json` were compiled output of `apm pack`,
+not hand-authored — and as of ADR-0024 (2026-09-14) both are deleted, along with native
+`claude plugin install` support; `apm install` is the only route. This ADR's content is kept
+below as the historical record of the pre-APM decision; it is no longer the current model.
 
 ---
 

docs/adr/0006-plugin-version-parity.md

@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ divergence is no longer possible by construction. `plugin-author`, the skill tha
 invariant, is deleted per ADR-0015 rather than adapted. Kept below as the historical record of
 the pre-APM decision.
 
+**Fully void as of ADR-0024 (2026-09-14).** Both manifests are now deleted outright, so the two
+files this ADR was about no longer exist in any form, compiled or hand-authored. `apm.yml`'s
+`version:` is the only version field a plugin has. This ADR states no patch-bump rule and never
+did — ADR-0015 retired that rule explicitly; do not cite this ADR as the source of one.
+
 ---
 
 Each plugin has two manifests: `plugin.json` (Copilot CLI) and `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` (Claude Code). Both tools support a `version` field. Prior to this decision, only the CC manifest carried `version`; the Copilot manifest omitted it.

docs/adr/0011-gitea-skill-deep-modules.md

@@ -67,6 +67,14 @@ than being wired into the plugin manifest. This means the gitea plugin is not ye
 standalone via `claude plugin install gitea@holocron` without manual MCP setup. A follow-up Gitea
 issue tracks closing this gap.
 
+**Correction (2026-09-14):** this gap is now closed by removal rather than by wiring. ADR-0024
+made apm the only supported install path, so `claude plugin install gitea@holocron` is no longer
+a route this repo supports, and the per-plugin manifests it needed are gone. Because apm reads a
+plugin-root `.mcp.json` only on the marketplace-plugin code path, that file became unreadable;
+every `plugins/*/.mcp.json` was deleted, including this one. A plugin that needs an MCP server
+declares it in `dependencies.mcp` in its `apm.yml` — the supported mechanism, which this repo has
+never used. The follow-up issue this paragraph anticipates is moot.
+
 **Research backfill.** The existing research docs
 (`plugins/gitea/docs/research/docs/gitea/`) are 100% code-derived from gitea-mcp source with zero
 external/best-practice content (the original docs.gitea.com fetch timed out and was never
@@ -105,5 +113,16 @@ avoids two near-empty skills each routing to a single tool family.
 - Follow-up issues are needed for: the deferred domains (Actions/CI, Wiki, Notifications,
   Packages, User/Org), the `.mcp.json` wiring gap, and the eventual removal of
   `plugins/bin/skills/gitea/`.
+
+  **Correction (2026-09-14):** the three bullets above are historical — do not act on them. The
+  `.mcp.json` half is closed by the correction in Decision: `c96ca9c` deleted every
+  `plugins/*/.mcp.json`, including this plugin's, because apm reads that file only on the
+  marketplace-plugin code path that ADR-0024 removed. **Do not recreate `plugins/gitea/.mcp.json`**
+  — an MCP server a plugin needs is declared in `dependencies.mcp` in its `apm.yml`. The
+  standalone-installability caveat is moot for the same reason: `claude plugin install
+  gitea@holocron` is not a supported route. `plugins/bin/skills/gitea/` no longer exists either —
+  `3a1305c` (2026-07-23) removed it as superseded by `plugins/gitea`, the cleanup this bullet
+  anticipated — so the "remains in place" claim and its follow-up are both spent. Only the deferred
+  domains remain open.
 - Future domain-plugin work in this repo can point to this ADR as the template for splitting an
   MCP-wrapping skill into deep modules.

docs/adr/0013-vale-harness-scope-and-rule-sources.md

@@ -22,8 +22,10 @@ spec-governed content, and `plugin.json` is JSON, not prose Vale can meaningfull
 
 **Rule categories are prose-pattern-matchable only.** Structural, schema, and security concerns
 stay out of this Vale-based harness because this repo already has dedicated tools for them:
-`skill-frontmatter` (required frontmatter fields), `validate-plugins`/`validate-marketplace`
+`skill-frontmatter` (required frontmatter fields), `validate-marketplace`
 (`claude plugin validate --strict`, schema), and `gitleaks`/`detect-private-key` (secrets).
+(ADR-0024 removed the companion `validate-plugins` gate along with the per-plugin manifests it
+checked; the argument here is unaffected.)
 Duplicating those concerns as Vale rules would fight tools that already own them better.
 
 **Governance docs are excluded as a rule source.** `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md`

docs/adr/0014-vale-prefilter-ships-from-the-plugin.md

@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ doesn't wonder if it was overlooked.
 - `plugins/kyberforge`'s `plugin.json` and `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` both patch-bump for every
   shipped content change (per ADR-0006's version-parity invariant): `1.2.5` for the relocation
   itself, `1.2.6` for the self-locating `vale-wrap.sh` that followed.
+  **Amended 2026-09-14 (ADR-0024):** a record of what was done then, not current practice. Both
+  manifests are deleted and `apm.yml`'s `version:` is a plugin's only version field; ADR-0015
+  retired the parity/patch-bump rule this bullet invokes.
 - **`.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` entries are a bare script path and nothing else — a constraint, not a
   house style, and it binds every future hook here, not just the Vale two.** Since pre-commit
   rewrites only `entry[0]` into the hook-repo clone, no argument token in any entry can reference

docs/adr/0015-apm-replaces-plugin-marketplace-authoring.md

@@ -169,7 +169,10 @@ correction) sorted what they document into three buckets:
   apm has no version-bump automation (established under "Versioning" in issue #90's plan), so an
   ageing pin is the accepted cost of a push gate that only fires on this repo's own changes.
   Note the pin does not make the entry offline-resolvable: an exact version still requires a
-  `git ls-remote`, which is why two pre-push hooks need the network (see `AGENTS.md`).
+  `git ls-remote`, which is why two pre-push hooks needed the network (see `AGENTS.md`).
+  **Superseded 2026-09-13:** the `mattpocock-skills` entry has been removed from root `apm.yml`
+  entirely, along with the `codex` marketplace output profile. No pre-push hook needs the network
+  any longer.
 - **Caveat on "Status: executed" above:** issue #90's own execution comment flagged, before merge,
   that Claude Code's ability to actually load content out of `.apm/` was unverified — that caveat
   turned out to be a real defect, not a formality: the native installer has zero awareness of
@@ -177,4 +180,7 @@ correction) sorted what they document into three buckets:
   marketplace. The manifest-compilation deliverable this ADR describes was genuinely complete;
   runtime discoverability was not. Fixed in ADR-0017 (a second, compiled flat-directory content
   mirror at each plugin root, generated by `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`) — see that ADR for
-  the root cause and the fix.
+  the root cause and the fix. **Superseded 2026-09-14:** ADR-0024 deleted that mirror and its
+  generator along with native `claude plugin install` support. The discoverability gap this
+  paragraph describes is therefore no longer bridged — it is no longer a gap this repo has, because
+  apm is now the only supported install path and apm reads `.apm/` directly.

docs/adr/0017-plugin-content-mirror-bridges-apm-to-host-discovery.md

@@ -1,5 +1,17 @@
 # Plugin roots gain a compiled flat-directory mirror of `.apm/` content so Claude Code can discover it
 
+**Superseded by:** ADR-0024 (apm is the only supported install path; the flat content mirror is
+deleted). The mirror this ADR created — `plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,hooks}/` — has been deleted,
+along with `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, its test suite, and the `check-plugin-content-sync`
+pre-push gate. Native `claude plugin install` is no longer a supported path, so the host discovery
+contract this ADR bridged is no longer one this repo satisfies. The diagnosis below is still
+accurate about how Claude Code's installer works; what changed is that nothing consumes it. The
+`mcpServers`, `hooks`-pointer and `hooks/hooks.json` amendments below are moot with the artifacts
+they governed; the symlink amendment's underlying gap is not — see ADR-0024's consequences. This
+ADR's content is kept below as the historical record; it is no longer the current model.
+
+---
+
 This ADR is a follow-on correction to ADR-0015 (Microsoft APM replaces hand-authored
 plugin/marketplace authoring), discovered during issue #90's post-execution review. It does not
 restate ADR-0015's rationale for adopting `.apm/` as the authoring source of truth — see that ADR

docs/adr/0018-repo-consumes-its-own-plugins-through-apm.md

@@ -5,6 +5,16 @@ authored `.apm/` tree discoverable by hosts that install natively. Both are abou
 marketplace. This ADR is about consuming it: how the plugins get onto the machine this repo is
 worked on.
 
+**Correction (2026-09-14): the flat content mirror named above no longer exists.** ADR-0017 is
+superseded by ADR-0024, and commit `718c79a` deleted the mirror
+(`plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,hooks}/`) along with its generator, its test suite and its pre-push
+gate; native `claude plugin install` is no longer a supported path, so there are no longer "hosts
+that install natively" for it to serve. Nothing this ADR decides depends on the mirror — it appears
+here only as the other half of "producing the marketplace", and once more under "Install output is
+gitignored" below, where the two copies of plugin content ADR-0017 governed are now one, `.apm/`
+itself, and committing the deployed skills would make a second rather than a third. Read both
+mentions as historical.
+
 **Status: executed (2026-08-14).** All six packages are installed into `/root/ai-development` by
 `apm install`; the six native project-scope installs (`claude plugin uninstall <name>@holocron
 --scope project`) are gone and `.claude/settings.json`'s `enabledPlugins` block is empty.
@@ -121,6 +131,19 @@ unprompted. The `gitea` and `context7` servers were never plugin-provided — th
 apm's "contributed no entries to claude settings; skipped" warning on `kyberforge` and `lint` is
 accurate and harmless.
 
+**Correction (2026-09-14): the MCP propagation above stopped operating, and the files it read are
+deleted.** It ran on one code path only — `apm_cli/deps/plugin_parser.py` maps a plugin-root
+`.mcp.json` onto `.apm/.mcp.json` for packages apm treats as *marketplace plugins*. Commit
+`718c79a` (ADR-0024) deleted every `plugins/*/.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and
+`plugins/*/.github/plugin/plugin.json`, so each package is now a plain apm package and that path no
+longer runs. The supported declaration was never in use either: `plugins/bin/apm.yml` has
+`dependencies.mcp: []`. That left the six plugin-root `.mcp.json` files dead config — five of them
+empty stubs, only `plugins/bin`'s carrying the `obsidian` server — and all six are now deleted along
+with the server itself, which is not wanted. The repo-root `.mcp.json` was apm's own generated
+output that happened to be tracked; it is deleted and gitignored, on the same reasoning as
+`.claude/skills/`. The rest of this paragraph is unaffected: `gitea` and `context7` were never
+plugin-provided, and the hooks claim never depended on any of this.
+
 **A `.apm/` edit now needs a round trip.** The dependency resolves from the remote, so an edit is
 invisible to the running session until it is pushed and the install is refreshed. Under the native
 install with `autoUpdate` the shape was the same; it was more noticeable here at first because the

docs/adr/0019-session-start-hook-keeps-the-apm-install-current.md

@@ -105,6 +105,15 @@ resolves to the mirror, where the script does not exist — verified, apm report
 `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/` either: that directory is `rm -rf`'d by every content sync (ADR-0017).
 A test pins the reference.
 
+> **Amendment (2026-09-14) — the mirror half of that reasoning is gone; the conclusion is not.**
+> ADR-0024 deleted the flat mirror and `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, so neither the `apm pack`
+> mirror-filtering behaviour nor the `rm -rf` content sync described above still happens. The
+> reference must stay exactly as written, for the reason that survives independently: `.apm/` is the
+> sole hand-edited authoring source (ADR-0015), it is what ships in the installed package root, and
+> `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/` no longer exists at all — so `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/...` still
+> names a path with nothing at it, now because the directory is gone rather than because a sync
+> emptied it. `tests/test-apm-current-hook.sh` still pins the literal string.
+
 **Session startup gets slower when the install is stale.** Measured: ~0.7 s for the `apm outdated`
 check when everything is current, ~10.4 s when six packages are behind and the refresh runs. The
 hook declares `timeout: 380` to cover a cold multi-package fetch. That number is not free-standing:
@@ -149,6 +158,17 @@ all. The script therefore exits silently when there is no `apm.lock.yaml` in the
 which is what makes it inert in a repo that does not consume packages through apm. Copilot CLI sees
 no hook at all, for the reasons already documented in `plugins/kyberforge/docs/hooks.md`.
 
+> **Amendment (2026-09-14) — both halves of that paragraph are gone; the guard is kept on other
+> grounds.** There is no `hooks/hooks.json` to auto-discover: `718c79a` deleted
+> `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/` with the rest of the flat mirror, and the only hooks manifest left in
+> the tree is `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/hooks/hooks.json`, which apm reads and a convention scan of
+> the package root never sees. And there are no native consumers to protect: ADR-0024 ended
+> `claude plugin install` support outright. The `apm.lock.yaml` guard itself stays, for the reason
+> that survives both — kyberforge ships to any apm consumer, and in a working directory with no
+> lockfile there is nothing for `apm update` to refresh, so exiting silently is the correct
+> behaviour rather than a defensive measure aimed at a second installer. The Copilot CLI sentence is
+> unaffected.
+
 **`scripts/git-hooks/` is now empty.** `post-push` and `test-post-push.sh` are deleted.
 `install.sh`'s copy block is generic and is kept; `test-git-hooks-install.sh` now synthesizes its
 own fixture hook instead of depending on a real one existing, so the mechanism stays tested and can

docs/adr/0020-skill-description-and-body-context-contract.md

@@ -212,10 +212,11 @@ hand-invoked skill sets `disable-model-invocation: true` and carries one plain h
 with no trigger list.
 
 Verified end-to-end rather than assumed: `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4` carries the
-flag, apm passes it through verbatim to both `.claude/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4` and the flat mirror
-at `plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4`, and `zoom-out` was — at the time of that check, when it
-was the only carrier — the one installed skill absent from the model-visible skill listing in a live
-session. It remains invocable as `/zoom-out`. `caveman` has since taken the flag as well, so the
+flag, apm passes it through verbatim to `.claude/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4`, and `zoom-out` was — at
+the time of that check, when it was the only carrier — the one installed skill absent from the
+model-visible skill listing in a live session. It remains invocable as `/zoom-out`. (That check also
+covered the flat mirror at `plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4`, which ADR-0024 deleted on
+2026-09-14; only the `.apm/` source and the deployed copy remain, and the pass-through is unaffected.) `caveman` has since taken the flag as well, so the
 corpus now has **two** carriers. Do not read a carrier list off this page; re-derive it:
 
 ```

docs/adr/0021-plugin-descriptions-state-a-domain-boundary.md

@@ -8,14 +8,25 @@ plugin is *for*, and the inventory lives where an inventory can be read off the
 
 **Status: accepted (2026-08-17).**
 
+**Amended by ADR-0024 (2026-09-14).** The decision stands unchanged — a published description states
+a boundary and never enumerates skills — but three of the four compile targets named below no longer
+exist. `718c79a` deleted every per-plugin `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `.github/plugin/plugin.json`;
+`0dffff3` deleted the repo-wide `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` mirror; and `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`
+with the codex profile producing it was removed 2026-09-13. A description is still authored twice —
+`plugins/<name>/apm.yml` and root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace.packages[]` — but now compiles into one
+file, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. Read the "four generated files" in Context and the "eight
+generated files" in Consequences as historical counts, true when written. The blast radius shrank;
+the staleness hazard that motivated this ADR did not.
+
 ## Context
 
 A plugin's published description is one string authored twice — in `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` and in
 the matching `marketplace.packages[]` entry of the root `apm.yml` — and compiled into four generated
 files per plugin edit: the plugin's `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `.github/plugin/plugin.json`,
 plus the repo-wide `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` and its `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`
-mirror. (`.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`, apm's codex profile, carries no per-package
-`description` or `version` at all and is unaffected.) It is the only text a consumer sees in a marketplace listing before
+mirror. (`.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`, apm's codex profile, carried no per-package
+`description` or `version` at all and was unaffected — that file and the profile producing it were
+removed 2026-09-13; see the amendment above.) It is the only text a consumer sees in a marketplace listing before
 installing. It is **not** a SKILL.md `description`: it is never preloaded into an agent's context and
 routes nothing at runtime. ADR-0020 governs that other artifact; this one governs this one. The
 overlap is a finding, not a scope: ADR-0020 established that capability enumeration in a description
@@ -80,6 +91,18 @@ output against `apm.yml`, so their entire job is to propagate whatever the descr
 those four files byte-for-byte and confirm they match. The `wiki` claim passed every one of the fourteen pre-push hooks, every day it
 was published.
 
+**Correction (2026-09-14): that gate list is down to one, and it was never two.**
+`scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh --check --all` does not exist — `718c79a` deleted the script and its
+`check-plugin-content-sync` hook with the flat mirror (ADR-0024). Of the two names left,
+`apm audit --ci` was never a drift gate at all: against this repo it checks only that each `apm.yml`
+parses and that a manifest declaring dependencies has a consistent `apm.lock.yaml`, and it reads no
+`description`. So the sole surviving gate that compares compiled output against `apm.yml` is
+`apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run`, run by the `apm-pack-check-clean` pre-push hook
+— and with the per-plugin manifests gone it propagates a description into exactly one file,
+`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, not four. This narrows the mechanism and changes nothing about
+the finding: propagation is still not verification, and nothing anywhere reads the `description`
+key for sense.
+
 **And the obligation is unbounded.** Under enumeration, adding one skill to `bin`, `git` or `gitea`
 means editing two copies of a prose string on top of the version bumps and regeneration any skill
 addition already owes under this repo's release policy
@@ -95,6 +118,10 @@ This decision covers the six plugins this repo authors. The root marketplace als
 `mattpocock-skills`, a third-party package whose description is not this repo's to write; its entry
 is out of scope and is left as published upstream.
 
+*(Note, 2026-09-13: `mattpocock-skills` has since been removed from the root marketplace. This
+section's scope statement is retained as the reasoning behind the boundary; the entry it describes
+no longer exists.)*
+
 ## Decision
 
 **A plugin's published `description` states the plugin's domain boundary. It does not enumerate the

docs/adr/0024-apm-is-the-only-supported-install-path.md

@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+# apm is the only supported install path; the flat content mirror is deleted
+
+**Supersedes ADR-0017** (plugin roots gain a compiled flat-directory mirror of `.apm/` content so
+Claude Code can discover it). ADR-0017's diagnosis was correct and is not in dispute: Claude Code's
+native installer convention-scans flat `skills/`/`agents/`/`hooks/` directories at the plugin root
+and has no model of `.apm/` at all, so without a mirror a natively-installed holocron plugin reports
+`Skills (0) Agents (0) Hooks (0)`. What changes here is not the mechanism but the premise — that the
+native install path is worth supporting. It is not, because nobody uses it.
+
+**Status: accepted (2026-09-14).** The mirror, its generator, its test suite, its helper library and
+its pre-push gate are removed. `.apm/` remains the sole hand-edited authoring source, unchanged from
+ADR-0015. The root `marketplace:` block in `apm.yml` and the compiled
+`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` it produces are **kept** — see "Also delete the marketplace
+catalogue" under considered options.
+
+## Context
+
+ADR-0018 moved this repo's own consumption of its own plugins onto `apm install`. From that point
+the flat mirror had no consumer inside this repo: it existed entirely for a hypothetical third party
+running `claude plugin install <name>@holocron`. No such consumer has ever been observed. The
+marketplace is on a private Gitea instance, and the repo has no telemetry, no issue traffic and no
+external clone record suggesting otherwise. The honest statement is that the native path has been
+maintained for an audience of zero.
+
+What that audience costs is measurable:
+
+| Artifact | Size |
+|---|---|
+| Tracked mirror files under `plugins/*/{skills,agents,hooks}/` | 213 files, ~20,000 lines |
+| `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` | 813 lines |
+| `tests/test-sync-plugin-content.sh` | 1,289 lines, 92 cases, ~83 s |
+| `scripts/lib/marketplace-plugins.sh` | helper, used only by the above |
+| `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook | ~4.5 s per push |
+| `validate-plugins` pre-push hook | ~4.9 s per push (6 × `claude plugin validate --strict`) |
+
+Roughly 22,000 lines of tracked content and tooling, and about 92 seconds on every push (83 + 4.5 +
+4.9; the two hook timings are the 2026-09-10 baseline measurements recorded in
+`SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md`, not re-measured here). The test alone is close to 30% of `run-tests`'
+wall time — the single largest item in it.
+
+**The native path's automated gate does not gate anything.** ADR-0017 cites
+`claude plugin validate --strict` passing on all six plugins as one of two verifications. That
+verification was re-run this session against a plugin directory with **every content directory
+deleted**, and it passed. `validate` reads the manifest; it never inspects content. It therefore
+cannot detect the exact `Skills (0) Agents (0) Hooks (0)` defect ADR-0017 was written to fix. The
+other half of ADR-0017's verification — the live behavioral test
+(`claude --plugin-dir plugins/kyberforge -p "list your skills and agents"`) — is a manual step,
+run by hand once in August 2026 and never since. So native-install correctness has been unguarded
+for a month, and the drift gate that runs on every push guards only that the mirror matches `.apm/`,
+not that the mirror works.
+
+**Dropping native install does not reduce host coverage.** This is the fact that makes the decision
+cheap rather than a trade. apm's skills convergence deploys skills to `.agents/skills/<name>/SKILL.md`,
+the shared path read by Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode and Windsurf, with Claude Code as
+the special case at `.claude/skills/`. The mirror served two hosts (Claude Code and Copilot, the
+latter only ever partially — see ADR-0017's own `hooks` amendment). apm serves eleven through those
+two roots: ten targets resolve to `.agents/skills/` — the six named above plus `agent-skills`,
+`antigravity`, `hermes` and `openclaw`, which are rooted there natively rather than by an explicit
+`deploy_root` — and `claude` is the eleventh at `.claude/skills/`. Four further targets (`kiro`,
+`grok-build`, `grok-cloud`, `copilot-cowork`) deploy skills under roots of their own, for fifteen in
+total; counted from `apm_cli/integration/targets.py` this session. A consumer who installs holocron
+through apm gets strictly more than one who installed it natively.
+
+**Verified empirically, not reasoned about.** In a scratch clone with the mirror and the six
+per-plugin manifest pairs deleted:
+
+- `apm marketplace add` still registers all 6 packages. It detects
+  `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` and reads the catalogue from there.
+- `apm install` still deploys 40 `SKILL.md` files across 39 skill directories, 4 agents, and
+  kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook — identical to the baseline install from the unmodified tree.
+- `apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run` exits 0 ("Version alignment OK",
+  "Marketplace working tree clean"), because it governs only the **root** `.claude-plugin/` outputs.
+  The six per-plugin `plugin.json` pairs were never apm-pack-governed: they were generated by
+  `apm pack --format plugin` invoked from inside `sync-plugin-content.sh`, so deleting the script
+  deletes their producer and nothing is left asserting they should exist.
+
+**Source-level proof the per-plugin manifests are droppable.**
+`apm_cli/deps/github_downloader_validation.py` probes package markers in a fixed order —
+`apm.yml`, then `SKILL.md`, then `plugin.json`, then `.github/plugin/plugin.json`, then
+`.claude-plugin/plugin.json` — and returns on the first hit. Every plugin here keeps its `apm.yml`,
+which is the first probe, so no `plugin.json` path is ever reached. The per-plugin manifests are not
+load-bearing for apm resolution; they were load-bearing only for the native installer.
+
+## Decision
+
+**apm is the only supported install path.** Concretely:
+
+- Delete the flat mirror at every plugin root (`plugins/<name>/skills/`, `agents/`, `hooks/`) and
+  the six per-plugin manifest pairs (`.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.github/plugin/plugin.json`).
+- Delete `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, `tests/test-sync-plugin-content.sh`,
+  `scripts/lib/marketplace-plugins.sh`, and the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook.
+- Delete the `validate-plugins` pre-push hook (`claude plugin validate --strict` over every plugin
+  directory). It is removed on the evidence above — it reads manifests only, so with the per-plugin
+  manifest pairs gone it has nothing left to read, and even while they existed it could not detect
+  the empty-content defect. `validate-marketplace`, which validates the one manifest this repo still
+  ships, is **kept**.
+- **Keep** the root `marketplace:` block in `apm.yml` and the compiled
+  `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. apm's own marketplace consumers read that same file; removing
+  it would stop holocron being an apm marketplace at all.
+
+The asymmetry between those last two bullets is the whole subtlety of this ADR, and it exists
+because apm deliberately reuses Claude Code's catalogue format rather than inventing one. The
+catalogue is shared between the two ecosystems; the per-plugin content contract is not. Deleting the
+content is what ends native support; keeping the catalogue is what preserves apm support.
+
+## Considered options
+
+**Status quo — keep mirroring on every branch (rejected).** Pays ~22,000 tracked lines and ~92
+seconds per push for a path with no users and no working gate. It is not free in author attention
+either: ADR-0017 accrued four amendments in two days, every one of them about a detail of the
+mirroring mechanism rather than about the content being mirrored.
+
+**Generate the mirror only at release, from a tag or a release branch (rejected).** Technically
+supported, and it is worth recording *why* it was rejected rather than leaving it to look like an
+oversight. Claude Code marketplace entries accept ref-pinned git sources, and apm already emits that
+exact shape: the `mattpocock-skills` entry removed from root `apm.yml` on 2026-09-13 compiled to
+`{"source": "github", "repo": ..., "ref": "v1.2.3", "sha": ..., "tag_pattern": "v{version}"}` — a
+`git-subdir` source pinned to a ref. So a release-only mirror would install correctly.
+
+Rejected on three grounds, stacking:
+
+1. It keeps the 813-line script and the 1,289-line test alive in full. It reduces how often they
+   run, not how much there is to maintain — and the maintenance, not the runtime, is what ADR-0017's
+   amendment history shows to be the real cost.
+2. It requires per-package tagging discipline this repo does not practise. `git tag` lists
+   repo-level tags (`v1.0.0`, `v2.0.0`, `v2.0.1`) matching no package version under the
+   `per_package` versioning mode the six plugins use. The tagging convention that would make
+   ref-pinning meaningful would have to be invented first.
+3. **There is no CI in this repo at all.** Every gate here is a git hook on a developer's machine.
+   A release-time regeneration step would therefore depend on a human remembering to run it, and its
+   failure mode is silent: a release tag whose tree contains a stale or absent mirror installs
+   natively and reports zero skills, which is precisely the ADR-0017 defect, reintroduced on the
+   release path where it is hardest to notice.
+
+**Also delete the marketplace catalogue (proposed, then rejected on evidence).** The initial shape
+of this decision deleted `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` along with everything else, on the
+reasoning that it is a Claude Code artifact. That is wrong. `apm marketplace add` probes
+`_MARKETPLACE_PATHS` in `apm_cli/marketplace/client.py` — `marketplace.json`, then
+`.github/plugin/marketplace.json`, then `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, first hit wins — and that
+read is what makes holocron an apm marketplace and what gives consumers the `<name>@holocron`
+short-name form. Deleting it would have broken apm consumers in order to remove a file whose format
+Claude Code merely happens to share.
+
+Note the probe order: `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` is the **last** resort, not the first, and
+the `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` this repo deleted earlier outranked it. That deletion was
+still inconsequential, but for a reason that has to be established rather than assumed — dropping a
+higher-priority candidate only demotes resolution to the next one, and a reviewer reproduced
+`apm marketplace add` against the post-deletion tree: it registered, found all 6 plugins, and
+resolved via `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. What would break is deleting the last candidate,
+which is exactly what this option proposed.
+
+**Declare holocron an apm marketplace as a new step (moot).** Considered as a follow-on to the
+above, and found to be already done: the `marketplace:` block in root `apm.yml` *is* the
+declaration, and `apm marketplace init` produces exactly that block. There is nothing to add.
+
+## Consequences
+
+**1. Native `claude plugin install` no longer works, and the failure is silent.** This is accepted,
+not overlooked. Because apm reuses Claude Code's catalogue format by design — an APM-based
+marketplace stays consumable by Claude Code's existing marketplace mechanism — a Claude Code user
+can still register holocron natively, and will then install six plugins containing zero skills,
+zero agents and zero hooks. No error is raised at any point; the manifests are valid and the
+directories are simply empty. There is no schema change available that would prevent this, because
+the catalogue format cannot express "this marketplace is not for you" — the compatibility is
+structural, and it is the same compatibility that makes keeping the catalogue correct for apm. A
+README note is the only available mitigation, and a note is not a gate.
+
+**2. Consumers now receive dev-fixture files.** apm installs from `.apm/`, and `.apm/` contains the
+per-skill `tests/` directories the mirror explicitly stripped (ADR-0017's depth-scoped
+`<category>/<name>/tests` exclusion). 10 `.bats` files across 6 skills therefore now deploy into
+every consumer's skill directories. Suppressing them would mean switching all six `apm.yml` files
+from `includes: auto` to explicit include lists — and an explicit list that is wrong silently drops
+content, which is the same failure class ADR-0017 was written to fix. Trading a cosmetic problem for
+a correctness problem is a bad trade, so this is deferred deliberately rather than fixed in passing.
+
+**3. `tests/run-bats.sh` must exclude `.claude/skills/`** from both its `find` walk and the
+`git ls-files` set-equality check that derives the expected test list. Deployed `.bats` files are
+now discoverable in the install output and would otherwise be found and double-run against a root
+they do not belong to — exactly the `apm_modules/` problem ADR-0018 recorded, arriving by a second
+route. Any future script that walks this repo's tree needs both exclusions.
+
+**4. No version bumps.** There is no standing rule that would require one. The patch-bump-on-content-
+change convention this repo once followed was ADR-0006's, and ADR-0015 explicitly retired it as a
+dual-manifest artifact: "Conventions that existed only because of hand-authored dual manifests
+(ADR-0006's version-parity/patch-bump rule …) are obsolete under `apm.yml`'s single-manifest model
+and were deliberately dropped." ADR-0015 also records that apm "has no native version-bump
+automation at all", so nothing mechanical demands one either. What remains is the substantive test,
+and it is satisfied independently: nothing under `.apm/` is touched here, only compiled artifacts are
+removed, so the content every apm consumer receives is byte-identical before and after. This also
+avoids triggering the `executables.allow`
+`kyberforge#<version>` pin cascade ADR-0019 describes, which would otherwise turn a cleanup into a
+multi-file coordinated edit for no functional gain.
+
+**5. Reintroduction recipe.** This is the insurance that made the decision acceptable, so it is
+stated concretely rather than left as "it's in git". To restore native install support: recover
+`scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` from git history (`git log --diff-filter=D -- scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`
+finds the deleting commit; `git show <sha>^:scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` recovers it) and re-run
+it with `--all`; it regenerates both the mirror and the per-plugin manifest pairs, because
+`apm pack --format plugin` produces them together. Separately, apm resolves a marketplace at a git
+ref — default `main`, with `--ref` pinning — so a consumer who pins an older ref still gets a tree
+containing the mirror and is unaffected until they move forward.
+
+**6. A negative result, pinned so it is not re-litigated: this does not relax the self-containment
+constraint.** The natural next thought is that with the native installer gone, the no-cross-skill-
+file-sharing rule (the rule that forced ADR-0014's Vale config duplication) could be relaxed,
+because that rule was read as a property of Claude Code's plugin cache-install. It is not.
+`plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/references/deployment-modes.md`, sourced from the
+agentskills.io spec, states the constraint independently for **APM package mode**: file references
+inside `.apm/skills/<name>/` must not reach outside that skill's own directory, and the spec defines
+no cross-skill sharing mechanism. So cross-skill file sharing remains impossible under the only
+install path that survives, and ADR-0014's duplication rationale stands unchanged.
+
+**7. Three of ADR-0017's four amendments become moot, and one loses its enforcement.** Recorded
+because each was a decision someone spent real effort on:
+
+- The `mcpServers` re-injection amendment (2026-08-14) is moot. Its target was
+  `.github/plugin/plugin.json`, which no longer exists; `reinject_mcp_servers()` dies with the
+  script that called it. Its reasoning — a path string, never an inlined object, because inlining
+  bypasses apm's credential sanitizer — is worth carrying forward as a general rule if per-plugin
+  Copilot manifests ever return.
+- The `hooks`-pointer amendment (2026-08-14) is moot in the same way, and its outcome was to change
+  nothing, so nothing is lost.
+- The `hooks/hooks.json` path-correction amendment (2026-08-14) is moot: there is no mirrored hooks
+  file to place.
+- The symlink amendment (2026-08-14) is **not** moot, and this is the one real regression.
+  `check_apm_symlinks()` read the `.apm/` source tree directly to report symlinks, because apm
+  filters them out silently and the resulting content loss is invisible to any mirror-versus-mirror
+  diff. That check dies with the script.
+
+  A previous revision of this ADR left open whether `apm install`'s own copy path drops symlinks the
+  way the bundle exporter does. It does, and the mechanism is now confirmed by reading the installed
+  apm source. Deployment filters them: `ignore_non_content()` in `apm_cli/security/gate.py` is a
+  `shutil.copytree` ignore callback whose docstring states "Excludes symlinks (security)", and
+  `apm_cli/integration/skill_integrator.py` passes it — or the equivalent `_build_copy_ignore()` —
+  to every `copytree` that materialises a skill (`:424`, `:791`, `:1152`), with further per-file
+  `is_symlink()` drops for `bin/` entries and the plugin manifest at `:1671` and `:1696`. None of
+  these log the skip. Materialization into `apm_modules/`, by contrast, **dereferences**: for git
+  sources `deps/github_downloader.py` copies the checkout out with `robust_copytree`/`robust_copy2`
+  and no symlink filter, and for local sources `install/phases/local_content.py`'s
+  `_copy_tree_dereferencing_validated()` resolves each in-package symlink and copies its content as
+  a real file (erroring on dangling, escaping or circular ones). So a symlink under `.apm/` survives
+  into `apm_modules/` as real content and is then silently dropped on deploy — the failure is at the
+  deploy step, not the fetch, which is why it would not show up in a cache inspection.
+
+  **This is accepted, and no replacement guard is added.** No symlink exists under any `.apm/`
+  today, and the mitigations available are worse than the exposure: a standalone repo-side checker
+  would be a new script to maintain for a condition that has never occurred, and it could only warn,
+  since the drop happens inside apm. The operative rule is therefore a convention rather than a
+  gate: do not introduce a symlink under any `plugins/*/.apm/` tree. If one is ever needed, the
+  filtering above is the reason it will not reach consumers, and closing the gap properly means an
+  upstream change in apm, not a local one.
+
+**8. ADR-0017's own exit condition was different from this one, and that is worth noting.** Its
+final consequence anticipated deletion, but conditioned it on an upstream fix: "a future apm release
+that ships a native `.apm/`-aware plugin.json compiler ... would let `sync-plugin-content.sh` and
+its drift gate be deleted outright." That release has not happened. The mirror is being deleted
+because the path it bridges has no users, not because apm closed the gap — the gap is still open,
+and a consumer who installs natively still hits it. ADR-0017's anticipated exit remains available
+and unclaimed; this ADR takes a different one.

docs/ai-constitution.md

@@ -235,4 +235,4 @@ It operationalises current regulatory and research consensus for practitioners.
 
 *Derived from: AI Governance Research Session (May 2026).*
 *Research documentation: `docs/research/governance_principles/ai-governance-research.md` | Open challenges: `docs/research/governance_principles/ai-governance-research-challenges.md`*
-*Operative files: `core/instructions/governance.md` (agent instructions) | `docs/HUMANS.md` (human practitioner rules) | `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md` (deterministic enforcement)*
+*Operative files: `core/instructions/governance.md` (agent instructions) | `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` (human practitioner rules) | `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md` (deterministic enforcement)*

docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Applies to: any environment, repository, or pipeline where AI tools are used.
 Full governance context: `docs/ai-constitution.md` — principles these controls enforce.
-Human practitioner rules: `docs/HUMANS.md` | Agent instructions: `core/instructions/governance.md`
+Human practitioner rules: `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` | Agent instructions: `core/instructions/governance.md`
 This file specifies the enforcement layer: controls that run mechanically, regardless of human or agent intention.
 
 **Why this file exists:** Agent instructions and human practitioner rules are probabilistic — they depend on attention and intent. This layer removes that dependency. A control that runs automatically in CI enforces a principle more reliably than any instruction in any file. Where a principle can be enforced deterministically, it must be.
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ Verify that the controls specified here remain aligned with the current version
 
 The specific tooling used to implement each control is the implementer's choice — tool selection is out of scope here. What is in scope is the requirement: what the control must detect, gate, or produce. Select tools that meet the requirement; replace them when better options exist without needing to update this file.
 
-Human judgment decisions — which AI model to use, whether a specific output is acceptable, how to classify ambiguous data — are governed by `docs/HUMANS.md`. Agent judgment decisions are governed by `core/instructions/governance.md`. This file governs only what can be enforced without judgment.
+Human judgment decisions — which AI model to use, whether a specific output is acceptable, how to classify ambiguous data — are governed by `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md`. Agent judgment decisions are governed by `core/instructions/governance.md`. This file governs only what can be enforced without judgment.
 
 ---
 
 *Derived from AI Constitution v1.1 — May 2026.*
-*Counterpart to: `docs/HUMANS.md` | `core/instructions/governance.md` | Full context: `docs/ai-constitution.md`*
+*Counterpart to: `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` | `core/instructions/governance.md` | Full context: `docs/ai-constitution.md`*

docs/spec/architecture.md

@@ -19,15 +19,17 @@ project repo (local overrides)
 - **Executables** (`DEPLOY_EXECUTABLES`): `providers/claude-code/statusline-command.sh` → `~/.claude/statusline-command.sh` (with `+x`)
 - **Directories** (`DEPLOY_DIRS`): `core/` → `~/.claude/core/` (destination fully replaced on each deploy)
 
-Skills are **not** deployed by `install.sh`. They are distributed as plugins and installed separately — in this repo by `apm install` against the `dependencies.apm` entries in the root `apm.yml`, which lands them in `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/` (ADR-0018); elsewhere by `claude plugin install <name>@holocron`.
+Skills are **not** deployed by `install.sh`. They are distributed as plugins and installed separately — in this repo by `apm install` against the `dependencies.apm` entries in the root `apm.yml`, which lands them in `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/` (ADR-0018). A consuming repo installs them the same way — apm is the only supported install path.
 
 `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` is a thin adapter, not a content source. It imports `~/.agents/AGENTS.md` (always-on rules) and `governance.md` (always-on governance) and carries nothing else — the content index of on-demand instruction files sits in `core/AGENTS.md`, deployed to `~/.agents/AGENTS.md` and imported by it. All always-on content lives in `AGENTS.md` files so other providers can import the same source without duplication.
 
 ## Plugin model
 
-Skills, agents, MCP servers, and hooks are distributed as self-contained plugin units under `plugins/`, installed independently — via `apm install` here, or `claude plugin install <name>@holocron` for a host consuming the marketplace natively (ADR-0018). Self-contained is a hard constraint, not a description: a plugin is copied to a cache on install, so nothing inside it may reference a file outside its own directory. That is why the Vale styles are duplicated across two skills rather than shared (ADR-0014), and why ADR-0020's constants are copied into three validators rather than sourced from one. Each plugin is an **apm package**: `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` plus a hand-authored `plugins/<name>/.apm/{skills,agents,hooks,commands,instructions,extensions}/` tree (ADR-0015). There is no hand-maintained `plugin.json` — every manifest and every host-visible content directory is compiled from that source.
+Skills, agents, MCP servers, and hooks are distributed as self-contained plugin units under `plugins/`, installed independently via `apm install`, here and in any consuming repo (ADR-0018). Each unit is an **apm package**: `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` plus a hand-authored `plugins/<name>/.apm/{skills,agents,hooks,commands,instructions,extensions}/` tree (ADR-0015). There is no per-plugin `plugin.json` at all — apm reads `apm.yml`, and the repo's one generated manifest, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, is compiled from that source.
 
-Which plugin a new skill belongs in follows from what each one is scoped to. The boundary that matters most in practice is `core` vs `kyberforge`: `core` is the home for cross-cutting, repo-agnostic utility skills that a consumer would want against *their* repo, while `kyberforge` is meta-tooling for the holocron marketplace itself. A skill that authors a target repo's `AGENTS.md` is `core`; a skill that audits a `SKILL.md` against this marketplace's contract is `kyberforge`.
+Self-contained is a hard constraint, not a description: a file reference inside `.apm/skills/<name>/` may not reach outside that skill's own directory, and there is no cross-skill sharing mechanism to reach for instead. That is why the Vale styles are duplicated across two skills rather than shared (ADR-0014), and why ADR-0020's constants are copied into three validators rather than sourced from one. The constraint used to be explained by Claude Code's plugin cache-install copying a plugin to a cache; that is no longer the reason and never was the only one. It is stated independently for APM package mode by the agentskills.io spec (`plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/references/deployment-modes.md`), which is why ADR-0024 consequence 6 pins it as a negative result: ending native install did not relax it, and it is not to be re-litigated on the assumption that it did.
+
+Which apm package a new skill belongs in follows from what each one is scoped to. The boundary that matters most in practice is `core` vs `kyberforge`: `core` is the home for cross-cutting, repo-agnostic utility skills that a consumer would want against *their* repo, while `kyberforge` is meta-tooling for the holocron marketplace itself. A skill that authors a target repo's `AGENTS.md` is `core`; a skill that audits a `SKILL.md` against this marketplace's contract is `kyberforge`.
 
 The second boundary worth stating is `git` vs `gitea`, because both own things called branches and both touch pull requests: `git` is whatever works over the git wire protocol against a local clone, `gitea` is whatever goes through the forge's HTTP API. That is why `git-branches` and `gitea-branches` both exist and are not duplicates.
 
@@ -42,14 +44,15 @@ These are routing boundaries, not inventories — they answer "where does a new
 | `lint` | Configuring and running linters against a target repo; repo-agnostic, first linter is Vale |
 | `bin` | Unsorted skills that have not earned a home yet |
 
-Two compilers produce the plugin roots you see in the tree:
+One compiler produces the generated content in the tree:
 
-- **`apm pack` compiles the manifests** (ADR-0015). Per plugin: `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `.github/plugin/plugin.json`, both generated from `plugins/<name>/apm.yml`. Repo-wide, from the root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace:` block: `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (apm's `claude` output profile) and `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (its `codex` profile, a differently-shaped file). Those two are the only marketplace outputs apm has profiles for — the third root manifest, `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` (Copilot CLI's legacy path), is a byte-identical mirror of the Claude one maintained by `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` and gated by the `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` pre-push hook.
-- **`scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` compiles the content mirror** (ADR-0017). It wraps `apm pack --format plugin` and copies the resulting bundle's flat `agents/`, `skills/`, `commands/`, `instructions/`, `extensions/`, and merged `hooks/hooks.json` back to the plugin root. Claude Code's installer convention-scans those flat paths and has no `.apm/` awareness whatsoever, so the mirror exists solely to satisfy the host's discovery contract.
+- **`apm pack` compiles the marketplace manifest** (ADR-0015). Repo-wide, from the root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace:` block: `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (apm's `claude` output profile) — the only manifest this repo generates or ships. Copilot CLI checks for a marketplace manifest at several conventional paths, falling back through `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` to `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` — since this repo already generates the latter, no dedicated Copilot-path mirror is maintained.
 
-`.apm/` is the sole hand-edited authoring source for plugin content. An edit made in the flat mirror is discarded by the next sync and is reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook. Hand-authored material that is not an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json`, and per-plugin extras such as `plugins/git/config.example.json`, `plugins/gitea/references/` and `plugins/bin/evals/` — lives at the plugin **root** and is untouched by either compiler.
+apm is the only supported install path. A flat `skills/`, `agents/`, `hooks/` mirror used to be compiled to each plugin root so Claude Code's installer could convention-scan it, alongside a per-plugin `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `.github/plugin/plugin.json`; both are gone, together with native `claude plugin install` support. apm reads `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` and deploys from `.apm/` directly, and never probed those manifests.
 
-That immunity is positional, not by filename. Anything placed *inside* a mirrored directory is destroyed regardless of what it is: `sync_dir` runs `rm -rf "$dst"` before every copy, and `sync_hooks_json` does the same to `hooks/`. A hand-written `README.md` under `plugins/<name>/hooks/` or `plugins/<name>/skills/` is deleted by the next sync with no drift report, because a file with no `.apm/` counterpart is simply absent from the regenerated tree. This has already cost the repo one document — `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/README.md`, since restored to `plugins/kyberforge/docs/hooks.md`. Plugin-root documentation belongs in `docs/`.
+`.apm/` is the sole hand-edited authoring source for plugin content. Hand-authored material that is not an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, and per-plugin extras such as `plugins/gitea/references/` and `plugins/bin/evals/` — lives at the plugin **root**. A hand-edit to the generated `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` is reported as drift by the `apm-pack-check-clean` pre-push hook.
+
+Plugin-root documentation belongs in `docs/`. That convention is older than the mirror's removal: a hand-written `README.md` placed inside a mirrored directory used to be destroyed by the next sync with no drift report, which cost the repo one document — `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/README.md`, since restored to `plugins/kyberforge/docs/hooks.md`.
 
 ## Governance layer
 

docs/spec/gates.md

@@ -21,38 +21,35 @@ Install hooks via `pc-run`, wiring **all three stages**. This repo's `.pre-commi
 `default_install_hook_types`, so a plain install silently skips `commit-msg` (Conventional Commits)
 and `pre-push` (everything below).
 
-The pre-push command reports **16** hooks, not 14. The extra two are pre-commit's own `meta` hooks,
+The pre-push command reports **11** hooks, not 9. The extra two are pre-commit's own `meta` hooks,
 `check-hooks-apply` and `check-useless-excludes`: they declare no `stages:`, so they run at every
 stage including this one. Both are declared in this repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` like everything
-else — what separates them is `repo: meta` (pre-commit's own built-ins) from `repo: local`. Fourteen
+else — what separates them is `repo: meta` (pre-commit's own built-ins) from `repo: local`. Nine
 is the count of hooks this repo authors itself.
 
-**The caveat: one of those 14 is a silent no-op under that invocation.**
+**The caveat: one of those 9 is a silent no-op under that invocation.**
 `check-release-needed` exits 0 immediately unless `PRE_COMMIT_REMOTE_BRANCH` equals
 `refs/heads/main`, and pre-commit exports that variable only from the real pre-push git hook during
 an actual `git push`. Running the stage by hand — or from a CI runner — therefore reports it
 `Passed` having checked nothing. That is by design for feature branches — pushing WIP must not be
 blocked on cutting a premature tag — but it means `--hook-stage pre-push --all-files` is a full
-rehearsal of 13 hooks and a skip of the fourteenth. The script's own header records the same gap for
+rehearsal of 8 hooks and a skip of the ninth. The script's own header records the same gap for
 a PR merged through Gitea's merge button, where no local push happens at all.
 
 ## The pre-push gate
 
-Fourteen hooks, grouped below by what they guard rather than by the order `.pre-commit-config.yaml` declares them in.
+Nine hooks, grouped below by what they guard rather than by the order `.pre-commit-config.yaml` declares them in.
 
 **Core checks**
 
 | Hook | Guards |
 |---|---|
 | `run-tests` | `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict` — the whole suite, skips fatal (see [Tests](#tests)) |
-| `check-manifests` | `marketplace.json` and `plugin.json` paths resolve (needs `jq`) |
 
 **Generated-content drift gates**
 
 | Hook | Guards |
 |---|---|
-| `check-plugin-content-sync` | each plugin's flat `skills/agents/commands/hooks` mirror matches `.apm/` (issue #90) |
-| `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` | `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` is byte-identical to `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` — no apm output profile targets that path |
 | `check-vale-style-sync` | skill-audit's Vale copy matches agent-audit's canonical copy, plus six glob-coverage probes (see [Vale](#vale)) |
 | `check-scope-walkup-sync` | `validate.sh`, `validate-provenance.sh`, `new-agent.sh` and `new-skill.sh`'s four independent `$HOME`/`.git`/`apm.yml` walk-up ports still agree behaviorally |
 | `check-executables-allow-sync` | root `apm.yml`'s `executables.allow` key names kyberforge's actual version (see [apm gates](#apm-gates)) |
@@ -70,15 +67,13 @@ drift in generated text.
 
 | Hook | Guards |
 |---|---|
-| `apm-marketplace-check` | every `marketplace.packages[]` entry resolves, including network reachability of remote refs |
 | `apm-audit-ci` | `apm audit --ci` once per manifest — root plus each of the six plugin packages |
 | `apm-pack-check-clean` | `apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run` — the compiled marketplace still matches what `apm.yml` + `.apm/` would generate, and per-package versions agree with the `per_package` strategy |
 
-**Host validators** (both need the `claude` CLI on PATH)
+**Host validators** (needs the `claude` CLI on PATH)
 
 | Hook | Guards |
 |---|---|
-| `validate-plugins` | `claude plugin validate --strict` on every plugin directory |
 | `validate-marketplace` | `claude plugin validate --strict` on the root marketplace manifest |
 
 **Release**
@@ -87,20 +82,20 @@ drift in generated text.
 |---|---|
 | `check-release-needed` | on a real `git push` to `main` only — fails if files exposed via `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` changed since the last tag. A no-op everywhere else, including under `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push` (see [the caveat above](#running-the-gates)) |
 
-Four of these shell out to `apm`: `apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`, `apm-pack-check-clean`,
-and `check-plugin-content-sync` (via `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, which wraps `apm pack`). The
-first and third are bare `apm …` entries and the second is a `bash -c` loop calling `apm` once per
-package, so without the CLI the push dies with an unhelpful "command not found". Install with
-`apm-install`, or `curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix | sh`; verify with `apm --version`. `jq` is
-needed by `scripts/check-manifests.sh` and `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` — those at least fail
-loudly (`Error: jq is required but not installed`).
+Two of these shell out to `apm`: `apm-audit-ci` and `apm-pack-check-clean`. The second is a bare
+`apm …` entry and the first is a `bash -c` loop calling `apm` once per package, so without the CLI
+the push dies with an unhelpful "command not found". Install with `apm-install`, or
+`curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix | sh`; verify with `apm --version`.
 
 ## Skill and agent context gates (ADR-0020)
 
 The `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook, scoped to `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$`,
 runs `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`. It is also shipped to external repos as
 `kyberforge-skill-size-check` (see
-[External consumers](#external-consumers-the-root-pre-commit-hooksyaml)).
+[External consumers](#external-consumers-the-root-pre-commit-hooksyaml)). Besides the ADR-0020
+gates below, it also asserts required frontmatter is present: `name`, a non-empty `description`, and
+a `metadata.version` matching three-part semver (`1.0.0`) — folded in from a formerly standalone
+`skill-frontmatter` hook that parsed the same fields with a shell script.
 
 **Two things fall outside that scope, both deliberately.** The `[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` tail admits only a
 `SKILL.md` sitting directly in a skill directory under `.apm/skills/`:
@@ -121,88 +116,9 @@ git ls-files | grep -E '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/.*SKILL\.md$' \
 ```
 
 The first count equals the number of skill directories (`ls -d plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/ | wc -l`);
-the second returns exactly the template. The remaining unmatched `SKILL.md` files in the tree are the
-generated flat mirror, which is excluded by the `.apm/` segment on purpose — a mirror edit is drift,
-not an authoring change.
-
-### `skill-frontmatter`, the other hook on that scope
-
-A second `repo: local` pre-commit hook, `skill-frontmatter`, runs on the **same** `files:` pattern at
-the same stage. It is a shell loop that, **for the YAML frontmatter block only** — everything between
-the opening `---` and the next `---` — asserts four things per file:
-
-| Check | Rejects with |
-|---|---|
-| a `^name:` line is present | "missing required frontmatter fields (name: …)" |
-| a `^description:` line is present | "missing required frontmatter fields (description: …)" |
-| `metadata:` contains a `^  version:` key, anchored, scanning to the next top-level key | "missing required frontmatter fields (metadata.version)" |
-| that version's value is three-part semver (`1.0.0`, quoted or not) | "has a malformed frontmatter metadata.version (…)" |
-
-Every one of those qualifiers is load-bearing, and each replaced a defect that let the hook report
-Passed having measured nothing. `tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh` pins all of them:
-
-- **Frontmatter-scoped, not whole-file.** The checks used to `grep` the entire file, so a `metadata:`
-  or `name:` block quoted in a **body code fence** satisfied them — `skill-author`'s own docs quote
-  exactly such a block.
-- **Bounded by the next top-level key, not by `-A10`.** The version check was
-  `grep -A10 "^metadata:" | grep -q "  version:"`, which ran ten lines past the end of the block: a
-  `version:` belonging to a following `source:` list entry counted (`write-docs` and `research` both
-  have a `source:` list immediately after `metadata:`), while a `metadata:` block with more than ten
-  lines before its `version:` was reported missing.
-- **`^  version:` anchored.** `"  version:"` was an unanchored substring, so a deeper-nested
-  `    version:` matched too.
-- **The value is asserted, not just the key.** `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/write-docs/SKILL.md` carried
-  `version: "1.0"` — present, correctly nested, and not a version — through an entire PR under a
-  presence-only check. Two-part `1.0` is a YAML float, not a version string.
-- **The call shape is pinned.** `entry: bash` with `args: ['-c', <script>, …]` needs an explicit
-  arg0 placeholder after the script: without it `bash -c` puts pre-commit's **first** filename in
-  `$0`, where `for f in "$@"` never sees it. A single-file commit — the normal case — therefore ran
-  the loop body zero times and exited 0. The third `args` entry (`skill-frontmatter`) exists solely
-  to absorb `$0`; do not remove it.
-- **An unreadable file is an error, not a pass.** A file with no closing `---` fails with "no closing
-  YAML frontmatter block" rather than falling through to a green.
-
-**It still overlaps ADR-0020's "description present and non-empty" FAIL, and the overlap is not
-clean.** The ADR (`:95-101`) requires that question be decided on the **YAML-folded value** and
-nowhere else, precisely because a line regex gets it wrong in both directions. Measured on fixtures:
-
-| Frontmatter | `skill-frontmatter` | `skill-size-check` |
-|---|---|---|
-| `description:` with no value, then `model: sonnet` | passes — the key is on a line | ERROR, "missing or empty" |
-| `"description": …` (quoted key, valid YAML) | **fails** — `^description:` does not match | passes, description read normally |
-
-So the grep is not a second opinion on presence. It is blind to the shape ADR-0020 was written
-against, and it is the only one of the two that objects to a quoted key. Neither disagreement is
-currently live in the corpus, and the honest reading is that presence is `skill-size-check`'s
-question — the grep's contribution to it is noise on one shape and silence on the other.
-
-What the hook adds that **no** ADR-0020 check reads is two keys: `name:` and `metadata.version`. A
-`SKILL.md` missing either passes `skill-size-check` at exit 0. That is its unique coverage, and the
-reason not to fold it into the size gate on the grounds of redundancy.
-
-#### Why this one stays a shell parser
-
-[`python3` and PyYAML are hard requirements](#python3-and-pyyaml-are-hard-requirements) below records
-that a hand-rolled frontmatter reader on this exact `files:` scope was **deliberately deleted**,
-because "a reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file it never
-measured." That reasoning is about `skill-size-check` and does **not** transfer here. Do not delete
-this hook citing it. Three differences:
-
-1. **It answers a strictly narrower question.** `skill-size-check` must know the *folded value* of a
-   `>`-block scalar to count its characters, which is where a line reader diverges from a parser —
-   one corpus description measured 270 characters parsed and 412 unparsed. This hook asks only
-   whether a key is on a line and whether one short **plain scalar** matches `N.N.N`. There is no
-   folding, no multi-line value, and no measurement to get subtly wrong.
-2. **It is frontmatter-scoped.** The failure mode that killed the old fallback was silently reading
-   past or short of the block. This one extracts the block explicitly and errors out when it cannot
-   find a closing marker, so "could not parse" is a red, never a green.
-3. **It is pinned by tests.** `tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh` drives the hook through pre-commit's
-   real `bash -c <script> <arg0> <files…>` invocation and asserts each defect class above. The
-   deleted fallback had no such suite; that is how its disagreement with a real parser survived.
-
-The trade it buys is that the hook stays repo-local. Moving it to a script would change the
-externally exposed `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` contract for consumers, for a check that has no need of a
-YAML parser.
+the second returns exactly the template. Every other tracked `SKILL.md` in the tree is one of the
+four vendored `plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/examples/skill-write/` corpus files, excluded by the
+`.apm/skills/` segment — the first of the two deliberate exclusions above.
 
 ### Two independent gate families, neither replaced the other
 
@@ -322,12 +238,9 @@ run it. Four cross-plugin targets here (`gitea-branches` → `git-branches`, `gi
 through `.claude/skills/` alone, so **the same commit measured 2 dangling targets on a developer
 machine and 6 on a fresh clone**. A gate shipping hot with no baseline cannot give two answers.
 
-Verified fixed: running the hook over a tree holding only `plugins/` and the root `apm.yml`, with no
-`.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, produced findings identical to the working tree. The figures that
-reproduction recorded — 26 description FAILs, 9 body FAILs, 2 dangling targets, 0 missing references
-— are the pre-retrofit corpus as it stood when the experiment was run, kept here as the evidence for
-the install-independence claim. They are not current: the retrofit under #99 took the first three to
-zero. What the experiment establishes is that the two trees agree, not what either measured.
+Verified: running the hook over a tree holding only `plugins/` and the root `apm.yml`, with no
+`.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, produces findings identical to the working tree — confirming the
+two trees agree on the current corpus, independent of what happens to be installed locally.
 
 ### Boundary-clause detection: three outcomes, not two
 
@@ -468,14 +381,9 @@ reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file
 which is the exact vacuous-green failure the `python3` check exists to avoid. `pip install pyyaml`
 (or `python3 -m pip install PyYAML`, or the distro's `python3-yaml`) if the hook reports it missing.
 
-**Neither requirement generalises to every hook on this scope, and one deliberate exception sits
-right next to it.** [`skill-frontmatter`](#skill-frontmatter-the-other-hook-on-that-scope) runs on the
-same `files:` pattern as a **shell** parser, on purpose — it asks only whether a key is on a line and
-whether one short plain scalar matches `N.N.N`, with no folding to get wrong, and moving it to a
-script would change the externally exposed `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` contract for consumers. That
-section carries the full argument. A reader arriving here first should not read this one as
-condemning it. `check-rtk-prefix` needs `python3` but **not** PyYAML: it reads the markdown body and
-never touches frontmatter, so it has no scalar to fold.
+**Neither requirement generalises to every hook in this repo.** `check-rtk-prefix` needs `python3`
+but **not** PyYAML: it reads the markdown body and never touches frontmatter, so it has no scalar to
+fold.
 
 ## Agent files take the description gates, not the body gate
 
@@ -515,52 +423,19 @@ knows the difference; doing so silently enforces a gate ADR-0020 declines to set
 
 ## Current retrofit status
 
-**The ADR-0020 gates ship hot, with no baseline file.** A shrinking baseline recording each
-non-compliant skill's current numbers was considered and rejected in favour of hot gates.
+The ADR-0020 gates ship hot, with no baseline file — a shrinking baseline was considered and
+rejected. The corpus is currently clean on both: 0 of 39 descriptions/bodies exceed their FAIL tier,
+0 dangling targets, 0 `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` (Vale) errors. History: issue #99.
 
-**The corpus is now clean on both gates.** Issue **#99** retrofitted all 39 skills plugin by plugin;
-`kyberforge` was the last wave, after which the corpus was swept as a whole rather than per plugin.
-Each sweep is followed by an **independent review round**: a fresh agent with no memory of the
-retrofit re-measures the corpus and files what it finds, and the round repeats until one lands no
-findings. The rounds are recorded as comments on **#99** — read the current state off that thread,
-which is why no round count is pinned here.
-
-| Gate | Current findings |
-|---|---|
-| `skill-size-check` | **0 of 39** descriptions and **0 of 39** bodies exceed their FAIL tier; 0 dangling targets; SUGGESTIONs outstanding (count not pinned — see below) |
-| `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` (Vale) | **0 errors** — the four `gitea-*` carriers were all retrofitted |
-
-**The SUGGESTION count is deliberately not recorded here.** It moves with every skill edit *and*
-with every change to the gate's own tiering, so any figure written down is stale by the next commit.
-Measure it instead:
+Nothing is grandfathered — a new skill, or an edit that crosses a FAIL tier, is blocked on first
+commit. SUGGESTION counts are not pinned here; they move with every edit. Measure and check both
+gates before starting work on a skill:
 
 ```
 bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md | grep -c '^SUGGESTION'
-pre-commit run skill-size-check --all-files    # same findings, via the hook
+pre-commit run --all-files    # size AND Vale — skill-size-check alone can pass while Vale still blocks
 ```
 
-A non-zero count is the expected steady state, not a regression. SUGGESTIONs exit 0 and block
-nothing; only the two FAIL tiers, the dangling-target ERROR and the missing-`references/` ERROR do.
-Read the count as a work queue, and the FAIL columns above as the gate.
-
-`Kyberforge.CompositionNote` is the ADR-0020 Vale rule banning composition and architecture prose
-from a description. Every Vale rule here is `level: error` with no ignorable tier, so a description
-that reintroduces one blocks the commit even though no skill carries one today.
-
-Because nothing is grandfathered, the gates now bite on **first commit**: a new skill, or an edit
-that pushes a description past 400 characters or a body past 900 words, is blocked until it
-complies. That is the steady state the retrofit was for — it is no longer true that an unrelated
-one-line fix to a skill requires retrofitting that skill first.
-
-Check where a skill stands before starting, and check **both** gates:
-
-```
-pre-commit run skill-size-check --all-files   # size/context only
-pre-commit run --all-files                    # size AND Vale
-```
-
-Scoping a retrofit off `skill-size-check` output alone leaves you blocked at the second gate.
-
 ## The `rtk` prefix gate (ADR-0023)
 
 `check-rtk-prefix` is a `repo: local` pre-commit hook running `scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh` over
@@ -738,9 +613,11 @@ Two prefilter hooks, with `.apm/`-scoped `files:` patterns:
 | `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` | `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` |
 | `vale-audit-prefilter-agent` | `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/agents/[^/]+\.agent\.md$` |
 
-Only the **authoring source** triggers them. A `SKILL.md` in the generated flat mirror matches
-neither pattern, so prose findings surface only when you edit the file you are supposed to be
-editing. Without the binary the hooks fail with a bare "command not found" and no install pointer.
+Only the **authoring source** triggers them. The `skill-author` scaffold template and the four
+vendored research-corpus `SKILL.md` files match neither pattern (see
+[Skill and agent context gates](#skill-and-agent-context-gates-adr-0020), which uses the same scope
+for `skill-size-check`), so prose findings surface only when you edit a file this repo actually
+authors. Without the binary the hooks fail with a bare "command not found" and no install pointer.
 
 **Two hooks, not one combined hook.** Both manifests split the prefilter in two precisely because a
 single hook can point at only one copy, and that copy would silently 0-file-skip the other file
@@ -989,10 +866,9 @@ does not deploy and the replay does not compare; shared enforcement belongs in
 
 ### Why it is excluded from `pretty-format-json`
 
-It is the **sixth and last alternation** in that hook's `exclude:` pattern, and the only one there
-for a reason other than "generated manifest". Mind which number you are quoting: **six alternations,
-expanding to sixteen real files** — 3 root marketplace manifests, 2 per plugin × 6 plugins, plus this
-one.
+It is the **second and last alternation** in that hook's `exclude:` pattern, and the only one there
+for a reason other than "generated manifest". Mind which number you are quoting: **two alternations,
+expanding to two real files** — `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, plus this one.
 
 `pretty-format-json --autofix` sorts object keys unless `--no-sort-keys` is passed, while apm's hook
 integrator emits insertion order (`matcher` before `hooks`, `type` before `command`). Leaving the
@@ -1006,30 +882,11 @@ fix.
 
 ## Pushing without a network
 
-Exactly **two** pre-push hooks need the network, for one shared reason: root `apm.yml`'s
-`marketplace.packages[]` contains exactly one remote entry — `mattpocock-skills`,
-`source: mattpocock/skills` — and resolving it needs a `git ls-remote`.
+No pre-push hook needs the network. Every entry in root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace.packages[]`
+resolves from a local `./plugins/<name>` path, so `apm-pack-check-clean` never calls `git ls-remote`.
 
-| Hook | Offline failure |
-|---|---|
-| `apm-marketplace-check` (`always_run`, resolves every entry) | `No cached refs (offline)` |
-| `apm-pack-check-clean` (re-resolves the same entry) | `Error: Git network timeout during ls-remote` |
-
-Pinning the entry to an exact version does **not** remove the call — an exact pin still ls-remotes.
-`--offline` rescues neither.
-
-To push without a network, skip both using pre-commit's own mechanism:
-
-```
-SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push
-```
-
-**Skip those two alone.** Verified under `unshare -rn`: the other twelve pre-push hooks pass offline
-because they are real local checks. (`check-executables-allow-sync` landed after that run, but reads
-two local manifests and makes no network call.) Adding any other hook to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
-
-`apm-audit-ci` calls `apm` too but stays local: its org-policy discovery resolves nothing on this
-remote *before* any network call, so it does not join the pair above.
+`apm-audit-ci` calls `apm` too but was always local: its org-policy discovery resolves nothing on
+this remote before any network call.
 
 ---
 
@@ -1039,10 +896,13 @@ remote *before* any network call, so it does not join the pair above.
   enforcement table (deterministic vs. auditor judgment), and every rejected alternative
 - `docs/adr/0019-session-start-hook-keeps-the-apm-install-current.md` — the `SessionStart` hook, the
   executable-trust gate, and the version-pinned allow key
-- `docs/adr/0017-plugin-content-mirror-bridges-apm-to-host-discovery.md`,
-  `docs/adr/0015-apm-replaces-plugin-marketplace-authoring.md`,
-  `docs/adr/0014-vale-prefilter-ships-from-the-plugin.md` — plugin content sync, apm-generated
-  manifests, committed Vale styles
+- `docs/adr/0024-apm-is-the-only-supported-install-path.md` — apm as the sole install path, and the
+  deletion of the flat content mirror and its `check-plugin-content-sync` gate. It supersedes
+  `docs/adr/0017-plugin-content-mirror-bridges-apm-to-host-discovery.md` (**superseded** — plugin
+  content sync, kept as the historical record)
+- `docs/adr/0015-apm-replaces-plugin-marketplace-authoring.md`,
+  `docs/adr/0014-vale-prefilter-ships-from-the-plugin.md` — apm-generated manifests, committed Vale
+  styles
 - `docs/spec/architecture.md` — directory structure, install pipeline, what is generated and what is
   hand-authored
 - `.pre-commit-config.yaml` — the hooks themselves, with inline rationale comments

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/caveman/README.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-# caveman
-
-Ultra-compressed output mode: drop articles, filler and pleasantries, keep the technical substance exact.
-
-## What it does
-
-Switches the agent into a terse register — no articles, no hedging, no pleasantries, fragments allowed, arrows for causality — while leaving technical terms, code blocks and quoted error strings untouched. The mode is *sticky*: once turned on it stays on for every subsequent response until the user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode", rather than decaying back to normal prose after a few turns.
-
-It carries one built-in escape hatch. Security warnings, confirmations for irreversible actions, multi-step sequences where fragment order could be misread, and any request to clarify are answered in normal prose, then the compressed register resumes.
-
-## Hand-invoked only
-
-`SKILL.md` sets `disable-model-invocation: true`. This is the single most important thing to know about this skill: **the model cannot route to it.** No other skill can hand off to it, and no phrasing in a user's request will cause it to be selected automatically. The only way in is the human typing `/caveman`.
-
-That is deliberate — output style is the user's choice, not an inference the router should make on their behalf. It is also why the description reads as one plain human-facing sentence rather than carrying the trigger phrasing and boundary clause a routable skill needs.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/caveman
-```
-
-Then keep working normally. To leave the mode, say "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — persistence rule, compression rules, worked examples, and the auto-clarity exception |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/diagnose/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# diagnose
-
-A six-phase discipline for hard bugs and performance regressions: feedback loop → reproduce → hypothesise → instrument → fix with a regression test → clean up.
-
-## What it does
-
-Imposes an order of operations on debugging so the agent cannot skip to guessing. The load-bearing phase is the first one: build a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug. Everything downstream — bisection, hypothesis testing, instrumentation — just consumes that signal, so the skill refuses to advance to Phase 2 without one, and says so explicitly rather than hypothesising blind.
-
-The remaining phases each carry a constraint worth knowing about: hypotheses are generated 3–5 at a time and must be falsifiable, so the first plausible idea cannot anchor the whole investigation; every debug log is tagged with a unique prefix (`[DEBUG-a4f2]`) so cleanup is a single grep; the regression test is written before the fix and only at a seam that exercises the real bug pattern; and the run closes by asking what would have prevented the bug, handing off to `improve-codebase-architecture` when the answer is architectural.
-
-Performance regressions take a branch of their own inside Phase 4 — baseline measurement and bisection, not logs.
-
-## Conditional reading
-
-Neither reference file is read on every run; `SKILL.md` names the condition for each.
-
-- `references/feedback-loops.md` is read when Phase 1 has no signal yet, or when the loop you have is slow or intermittent.
-- `references/regression-seams.md` is read when Phase 5 leaves you unsure whether the available seam is deep enough — or whether one exists at all.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/diagnose
-```
-
-Describe the bug or the regression. For filing and triaging a reported bug rather than diagnosing it, use `triage`; for test-first feature work, use `tdd`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The six phases and their gates — what must be true before each one ends |
-| `references/feedback-loops.md` | Loaded when Phase 1 has no loop or the loop is too weak: ten ways to construct one ordered by cost, how to sharpen an existing loop, handling intermittent bugs, and what to ask the user for when the bug resists reproduction |
-| `references/regression-seams.md` | Loaded when Phase 5 is unsure about the seam: what makes a seam correct, the four shapes of a too-shallow seam, and what to do when no correct seam exists |
-| `assets/hitl-loop.template.sh` | Copy-and-edit bash template for the last-resort human-in-the-loop feedback loop, cited by `references/feedback-loops.md`. Provides `step` and `capture` helpers and prints captured values as `KEY=VALUE` for the agent to parse |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md

@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ description: >
   broken, throwing, or failing, or says something got slow. Not filing or
   triaging a reported bug -> `triage`. Not test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
 metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Diagnose
 
 A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.
 
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.
+When exploring the codebase, use the domain glossary for a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area.
 
 ## Phase 1 — Build a feedback loop
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/grill-me/README.md

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-# grill-me
-
-Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until the decision tree is fully resolved.
-
-## What it does
-
-Turns the agent into an interviewer rather than an implementer. It walks the design tree branch by branch, resolving dependencies between decisions one at a time, and offers its own recommended answer alongside each question so the user has something concrete to push against. Two rules give it its shape: **one question at a time**, and **never ask what the codebase can answer** — if a question is settleable by reading the code, the agent goes and reads the code instead of spending the user's attention on it.
-
-## Composition
-
-This is the plain grilling loop, with no documentation side effects. The sibling `grill-with-docs` skill runs the same interview but additionally challenges answers against the project's `CONTEXT.md` glossary and existing ADRs, and writes decisions back into those files as they crystallise. Reach for that one when the project has a domain model worth defending; reach for this one when it does not, or when nothing should be written down yet.
-
-`triage` composes the documented variant, not this one, when an issue needs fleshing out.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/grill-me
-```
-
-Describe the plan or design to be stress-tested. Expect questions one at a time, each with a recommended answer.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — the interview instruction, the one-question-at-a-time rule, and the explore-instead-of-asking rule |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/grill-with-docs/README.md

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-# grill-with-docs
-
-The grilling interview, run against the project's domain model — and writing decisions back into `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs as they land.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs the same relentless one-question-at-a-time interview as `grill-me`, with the project's own documentation as an active participant. During codebase exploration it also locates the domain documentation — a root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`, or a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing at per-context glossaries and ADR directories in a multi-context repo — and then uses it five ways:
-
-- **Challenges terms against the glossary.** When the user's usage conflicts with what `CONTEXT.md` already defines, that is raised immediately rather than absorbed.
-- **Sharpens fuzzy language** by proposing a precise canonical term ("you're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User?").
-- **Stress-tests domain relationships with concrete scenarios**, inventing edge cases that force the user to be precise about where one concept ends and the next begins.
-- **Cross-references claims against the code**, and surfaces contradictions between what the user says happens and what the code does.
-- **Updates `CONTEXT.md` inline**, the moment a term is resolved, rather than batching changes to the end of the session where they get lost.
-
-Files are created lazily — only when there is something real to write.
-
-ADRs are offered *sparingly*, and only when all three tests pass: the decision is hard to reverse, it would surprise a future reader without the context, and it was a genuine trade-off with real alternatives. Missing any one of the three means no ADR.
-
-## Composition
-
-`grill-me` is the same interview without the documentation side effects — use it when there is no domain model to defend or nothing should be written down yet. `triage` composes this skill (not `grill-me`) at step 4 when an issue needs fleshing out. `improve-codebase-architecture` runs its own grilling loop and borrows this skill's `CONTEXT.md` and ADR discipline for the decisions that come out of it.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/grill-with-docs
-```
-
-Describe the plan or design. Expect questions one at a time, each with a recommended answer, and expect `CONTEXT.md` to be edited during the session rather than after it.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The interview instruction plus the domain-awareness rules: file layout discovery, the five during-session behaviours, and the three-part ADR test |
-| `references/context-format.md` | Cited when a term is resolved: the structure of a `CONTEXT.md` and how to write a Language entry |
-| `references/adr-format.md` | Cited when an ADR is offered: `docs/adr/` naming, sequential numbering, and the ADR template |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/README.md

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-# improve-codebase-architecture
-
-Surface architectural friction and propose deepening opportunities — refactors that turn shallow modules into deep ones.
-
-## What it does
-
-Looks for places where a codebase is hard to understand, hard to test, or hard for an agent to navigate, and proposes refactors that concentrate behaviour behind smaller interfaces. It runs in three stages:
-
-1. **Explore.** Reads the domain glossary and any ADRs in the area first, then walks the codebase with an `Explore` sub-agent — organically, noting friction rather than applying fixed heuristics. The **deletion test** is the filter: imagine deleting the module; if complexity vanishes it was a pass-through, if complexity reappears across N callers it was earning its keep.
-2. **Present candidates.** A numbered list, each with files, problem, solution and benefits — benefits stated in terms of *locality* and *leverage* and of how tests would improve. No interfaces are proposed yet; the user picks one.
-3. **Grilling loop.** Walks the design tree for the chosen candidate, with documentation side effects landing inline as decisions crystallise.
-
-The skill is opinionated about vocabulary, and that is the point: **module, interface, implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality**, used exactly, with no drift into "component", "service", "API" or "boundary". Domain nouns come from `CONTEXT.md`, architecture nouns from `references/language.md` — so a proposal reads as "the Order intake module", never "the FooBarHandler".
-
-ADRs are treated as decisions not to be re-litigated. A candidate that contradicts one is surfaced only when the friction is real enough to warrant reopening it, and is marked as such.
-
-## Composition
-
-`diagnose` hands off here when a bug's post-mortem concludes that no correct test seam exists, or that callers are tangled — the recommendation is made after the fix is in, not before. The grilling loop follows `grill-with-docs`'s discipline for `CONTEXT.md` entries and ADR offers, and `SKILL.md` names that skill's format documents directly.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/improve-codebase-architecture
-```
-
-Point at a codebase or an area of one. Expect a numbered candidate list and a "which of these would you like to explore?" before any interface design happens.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Condensed glossary, key principles, and the three-stage process |
-| `references/language.md` | Cited throughout `SKILL.md`: full definitions of every term, the words each one replaces, and the full principle list |
-| `references/interface-design.md` | Read at stage 3 when the user wants alternative interfaces explored: the parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern, framing the problem space, and the per-agent design constraints |
-| `references/deepening.md` | Cited from `references/interface-design.md`: how to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, the four dependency categories (in-process, local-substitutable, remote-but-owned, true external), seam discipline, and the replace-don't-layer testing strategy |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: >
   into deep ones, informed by `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a
   failure -> `diagnose`.
 metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Improve Codebase Architecture
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language give
 
 ### 1. Explore
 
-Read the project's domain glossary and any ADRs in the area you're touching first.
+Read the domain glossary and any ADRs in the area first.
 
 Then use the Agent tool with `subagent_type=Explore` to walk the codebase. Don't follow rigid heuristics — explore organically and note where you experience friction:
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/prototype/README.md

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# prototype
-
-Build a throwaway prototype that answers one design question — either a runnable terminal app or several UI variations.
-
-## What it does
-
-Treats a prototype as **throwaway code that answers a question**, and lets the question decide the artifact. `SKILL.md` opens with a two-row dispatch table and the run resolves exactly one row before doing anything else:
-
-- *"Does this logic / state model feel right?"* → a tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through the cases that are hard to reason about on paper.
-- *"What should this look like?"* → several radically different UI variations on one route, switchable from a floating bottom bar via a URL search param.
-
-The two branches produce fundamentally different artifacts, so picking wrong wastes the whole prototype. When the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user is unreachable, the skill defaults on the shape of the surrounding code (backend module → logic, page or component → UI) and states the assumption at the top of the prototype rather than silently choosing.
-
-Six rules apply to both branches: throwaway and visibly named as such, one command to run, no persistence by default, no polish, surface the full state after every action or variant switch, and delete or absorb the prototype when it is done. The *answer* is the only durable output — the skill captures it in a commit message, ADR, issue or `NOTES.md` before the code is deleted.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/prototype
-```
-
-State the design question. For production code, use `tdd`; for talking a design through without building anything, use `grill-me`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The branch dispatch table and the rules that apply to both branches |
-| `references/logic.md` | The logic branch, read only when that row is selected: when it is the right shape, and how to build the interactive terminal app |
-| `references/ui.md` | The UI branch, read only when that row is selected: when it is the right shape, and how to build and switch between the variations |
-
-Each reference is self-contained — a run reads one of the two, never both.

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/research/README.md

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-# research
-
-Research a tool, library or API from canonical documentation into a directory of structured per-topic reference files.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs a six-step pipeline: scope against the working directory (what version is actually in use, what is already documented), resolve the topic through Context7, websearch for canonical docs covering whatever Context7 missed, read those sources, deepen one level into the links worth following, then write one markdown file per topic area plus a `sources.md` provenance record.
-
-Four gotchas at the top of `SKILL.md` shape the whole run, and each exists because of a specific failure: the output path is never inferred (a guessed destination scatters a directory's worth of files through someone's source tree); nothing is written outside that path; no empty topic file is ever written (a stub `troubleshooting.md` reads downstream as researched and closed); and a Context7 "no results", redirect or header-only response does not count as coverage. If no topic area has content, the run writes nothing at all — `sources.md` included — and reports what it searched.
-
-The frontmatter pins `model: sonnet` and a closed `allowed-tools` list. Notably it grants no subagent tool, so every `WebFetch` is serial and each fetched page lands in the run's own context — which is why steps 4 and 5 insist on reducing each page to notes before fetching the next, and cap deepening at roughly ten extra pages.
-
-## Composition
-
-Both reference files are read on condition, never on every run — `SKILL.md` inlines the minimum each step needs (the seven default topic areas at step 1, the four `sources.md` field names and the topic-file frontmatter keys at step 6) and sends the run to the reference only for what it does not carry. Those four field names are matched literally by the downstream provenance validator, so prose written in their place parses as nothing and the check passes having verified nothing — which is why they are inlined rather than deferred.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/research
-```
-
-Name the topic and the output path — the skill will stop and ask if the path is missing. Supplying starting URLs is treated as a deliberate source choice and skips Context7 resolution and discovery. For documentation derived from existing code or specs, use `write-docs`; for a bug or incident, use `diagnose`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The four gotchas and the six research steps |
-| `references/topics.md` | Read at Step 1 only when what belongs in a default topic is unclear or a custom topic is needed: the per-topic coverage table and the custom-topic naming rule |
-| `references/file-format.md` | Read at Step 6 only when the inlined field names do not settle the case: slug derivation, the Context7 slug and URL convention, and what belongs in a topic body |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/tdd/README.md

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# tdd
-
-Test-driven development as a strict red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time.
-
-## What it does
-
-Two convictions drive this skill. The first is about what a test is for: tests verify behaviour through public interfaces, not implementation details. A good test reads like a specification ("user can checkout with valid cart") and survives refactors because it does not care about internal structure. The warning sign for a bad one is precise — the test breaks when you refactor but behaviour has not changed.
-
-The second is an explicit anti-pattern: **do not write all the tests first, then all the implementation.** Horizontal slicing treats RED as "write every test" and GREEN as "write every implementation", and it produces tests of *imagined* behaviour — tests of the shape of things, insensitive to real change, committed to before the implementation was understood. The correct shape is vertical: one test → one implementation → repeat, each cycle informed by what the last one taught you.
-
-The workflow is four stages: plan (confirm the interface and which behaviours matter, with the user — you cannot test everything), fire a tracer bullet (one test proving the path works end to end), loop incrementally one behaviour at a time, then refactor once everything is green. Refactoring while RED is forbidden.
-
-Codebase exploration uses the project's domain glossary, so test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and ADRs in the area are respected.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/tdd
-```
-
-Describe the feature or bug. Expect the skill to ask what the public interface should look like and which behaviours matter most before any code is written. For diagnosing an existing bug rather than building test-first, use `diagnose`; for throwaway exploratory code, use `prototype`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Philosophy, the horizontal-slicing anti-pattern, the four-stage workflow, and the per-cycle checklist |
-| `references/tests.md` | Cited from Philosophy: worked good and bad test examples |
-| `references/mocking.md` | Cited from Philosophy: mock at system boundaries only, and what not to mock |
-| `references/deep-modules.md` | Cited from stage 1: what a deep module is (small interface, large implementation) and why it is the design to aim for |
-| `references/interface-design.md` | Cited from stage 1: designing interfaces for testability, starting with accepting dependencies rather than creating them |
-| `references/refactoring.md` | Cited from stage 4: the refactor-candidate checklist — duplication, long methods, shallow modules, feature envy, primitive obsession |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/tdd/SKILL.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: >
   red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time. Not diagnosing an existing
   bug -> `diagnose`. Not throwaway exploratory code -> `prototype`.
 metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Test-Driven Development
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ RIGHT (vertical):
 
 ### 1. Planning
 
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
+When exploring the codebase, use the domain glossary so test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area.
 
 Before writing any code:
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/triage/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# triage
-
-Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.
-
-## What it does
-
-Gives issue triage an explicit state model and a fixed set of moves. Every issue carries exactly one **category** role (`bug`, `enhancement`) and one **state** role (`needs-triage`, `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, `wontfix`); conflicting state roles are flagged to the maintainer before anything else happens. Unlabeled issues normally enter at `needs-triage`; `needs-info` returns there once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any point, and unusual transitions are questioned rather than executed silently.
-
-A run does one of three things depending on what the maintainer asks for:
-
-- **Show what needs attention** — three buckets, oldest first: unlabeled, `needs-triage`, and `needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes.
-- **Triage a specific issue** — gather context (including prior triage notes, so resolved questions are not re-asked, and `.out-of-scope/` records that resemble the issue), recommend a category and state with reasoning, attempt reproduction for bugs *before* any grilling, run a `grill-with-docs` session if the issue needs fleshing out, then apply the outcome.
-- **Quick state override** — "move #42 to ready-for-agent" is trusted and applied directly, skipping grilling, after confirming the exact changes.
-
-Two hard rules: every comment or issue the skill posts during triage must open with the AI-generated disclaimer, and the canonical role names above are *not* necessarily the label strings in the tracker — each is resolved against the tracker's live label set before it is applied, and a name with no counterpart there is reported to the maintainer as a gap rather than guessed at.
-
-## Composition
-
-`grill-with-docs` is invoked at step 4 when an issue needs fleshing out; whatever that session establishes is carried into the triage notes so the work is not lost. The reverse direction also exists: `diagnose` names this skill as the place to send a *reported* bug that needs filing rather than debugging.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/triage
-```
-
-Then describe what you want in natural language — "show me anything that needs my attention", "let's look at #42", "move #42 to ready-for-agent", "what's ready for agents to pick up?".
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The roles and state machine, the three invocation modes, the needs-info template, and how to resume a prior session |
-| `references/agent-brief.md` | Cited when an issue moves to `ready-for-agent` (and reused for `ready-for-human`): how to write a brief that stays durable for weeks while the codebase moves under it — describe interfaces and behavioural contracts, not line numbers |
-| `references/out-of-scope.md` | Cited when an enhancement is closed `wontfix` and when checking for prior rejections: how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base is laid out and what it is for — institutional memory, and deduplication against re-litigated requests |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/triage/SKILL.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: >
   tracker's triage states, or an issue prepared for an AFK agent. Not debugging
   the bug itself -> `diagnose`. Not fleshing out a design -> `grill-with-docs`.
 metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Triage
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
 
 ## Triage a specific issue
 
-1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
+1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
 
 2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/write-docs/README.md

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# write-docs
-
-Produce technical documentation derived from code and spec, one section at a time, with a confirmation gate on every section.
-
-## What it does
-
-Casts the agent as a technical writer with one non-negotiable constraint: **every claim must be traceable to a source file line, a spec section, or an explicit user statement.** Nothing is invented, and behaviour that genuinely cannot be documented from the available sources is marked out-of-scope rather than explained away.
-
-The process is eight steps — identify scope, read and extract, gap check, draft section by section, confirmation gate, delta summary, reader testing, finalise — and several of them are deliberately gated on the human:
-
-- Files are read only after the user approves them by name. The skill may propose candidates; it waits.
-- The **gap check** presents what the code does say and asks the user to fill only what it does not: caller intent, error-handling rationale, non-obvious side effects.
-- No section is finalised until the full revised text has been shown. The skill never gates on output the user has not seen, and never reprints the whole document — all edits are surgical.
-- **Reader testing** predicts 5–10 questions a target reader would ask, then spawns a sub-agent that receives only the finished doc and the questions — no source files. If the doc cannot answer them, neither can the sub-agent, and the run loops back to drafting.
-
-Summary and overview sections are written last, once the detail sections are stable.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/write-docs
-```
-
-Name the files or modules to document, the target audience (developer / user / contributor / internal), and the documentation type (reference, guide, README section, inline comment, changelog entry). For a PRD, ADR or decision doc, use `grill-me` or `grill-with-docs` instead — those have dedicated handling.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — role, use/do-not-use boundaries, required inputs, constraints, the eight-step process, output format, failure handling, and a nine-item self-check |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/zoom-out/README.md

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-# zoom-out
-
-Ask the agent to go up a layer of abstraction and map the modules and callers around unfamiliar code.
-
-## What it does
-
-A single-purpose prompt for the moment you land in a part of the codebase you do not know. Instead of answering at the level of the file in front of it, the agent climbs one layer and produces a map of the relevant modules and their callers — and names them using the project's own domain glossary vocabulary, so the map lines up with the language the rest of the repo already uses.
-
-## Hand-invoked only
-
-`SKILL.md` sets `disable-model-invocation: true`, so the router never selects this skill on its own and no other skill can hand off to it. It runs when the human asks for it. That also means its description is written as one plain human-facing sentence — it carries no trigger phrasing or boundary clause, because nothing routes on it.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/zoom-out
-```
-
-Best used with the unfamiliar code already in context — the skill widens the view around what you are looking at rather than picking a starting point for you.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — a single instruction, no supporting files |

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: zoom-out
 description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
 disable-model-invocation: true
 metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
-I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.
+I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary.

plugins/bin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "bin",
-  "version": "1.1.7",
-  "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
-  "author": {
-    "name": "Defame1297",
-    "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
-    "url": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/"
-  },
-  "license": "MIT",
-  "homepage": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/bin",
-  "repository": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/bin",
-  "keywords": [
-    "utility",
-    "diagnostics",
-    "prototyping",
-    "tdd",
-    "research"
-  ],
-  "mcpServers": {
-    "obsidian": {
-      "args": [
-        "@bitbonsai/mcpvault@0.15.0",
-        "docs/"
-      ],
-      "command": "npx",
-      "type": "stdio"
-    }
-  }
-}

plugins/bin/.github/plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "bin",
-  "version": "1.1.7",
-  "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
-  "author": {
-    "name": "Defame1297",
-    "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
-    "url": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/"
-  },
-  "license": "MIT",
-  "homepage": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/bin",
-  "repository": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/bin",
-  "keywords": [
-    "utility",
-    "diagnostics",
-    "prototyping",
-    "tdd",
-    "research"
-  ],
-  "mcpServers": ".mcp.json"
-}

plugins/bin/.mcp.json

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "mcpServers": {
-    "obsidian": {
-      "args": [
-        "@bitbonsai/mcpvault@0.15.0",
-        "docs/"
-      ],
-      "command": "npx",
-      "type": "stdio"
-    }
-  }
-}

plugins/bin/README.md

@@ -4,40 +4,32 @@ A place for things to be binned
 
 ## Install
 
-**Claude Code:**
+apm is the only supported install path (ADR-0024). Declare this package in the consuming project's `apm.yml`:
 
-```bash
-claude plugin marketplace add <owner>/<repo>
-claude plugin install bin@<marketplace-name>
+```yaml
+dependencies:
+  apm:
+    - git: git@git.dev.rkdr.net:Defame1297/holocron.git
+      path: plugins/bin
 ```
 
-**GitHub Copilot CLI:**
+Then:
 
 ```bash
-copilot plugin marketplace add <owner>/<repo>
-copilot plugin install bin
+apm install
 ```
 
-**Local (development):**
+The entry above is unpinned and tracks the remote's default branch — add `ref: <tag>` to pin a release. Registering the catalogue instead (`apm marketplace add git@git.dev.rkdr.net:Defame1297/holocron.git --name holocron`) gets you the `bin@holocron` short name, but writes to `~/.apm/marketplaces.json` at user scope; the git+path object needs nothing beyond the manifest.
 
-```bash
-# Claude Code
-claude --plugin-dir ./plugins/bin
-
-# GitHub Copilot CLI
-copilot plugin install ./plugins/bin
-```
+**Native plugin installs do not work.** This package ships no per-plugin manifest and no flat content directories, so a host that installs it natively gets zero skills — and Claude Code raises no error while doing it (ADR-0024).
 
 ## Contents
 
 | Component | Path | Description |
 |---|---|---|
-| Skills | `.apm/skills/` → `skills/` | Slash commands available after install |
-| MCP servers | `.mcp.json` | The `obsidian` server (`npx @bitbonsai/mcpvault@0.15.0 docs/`), hand-authored at the plugin root |
+| Skills | `.apm/skills/` | Slash commands available after install |
 
-`.apm/` is the authoring source; `skills/` is the generated mirror plugin hosts scan (ADR-0017). This plugin ships no agents. It is the only plugin here with a non-empty `.mcp.json`, which is why its compiled manifests are the only ones carrying an `mcpServers` block.
-
-The two compiled manifests get that block by different routes. `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` gets it from apm itself: `build_plugin_manifest`'s Claude branch calls `collect_mcp_servers`, which reads `.mcp.json`, sanitizes it, and inlines the resulting server objects. `.github/plugin/plugin.json` gets nothing from apm — the Copilot branch drops the field — so `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`'s `reinject_mcp_servers()` puts it back, as the **string `".mcp.json"`** rather than the resolved objects. Copilot's manifest schema types the field as "string or object — MCP server config path or inline definitions", and a path reference cannot carry a credential into a committed manifest. See ADR-0017's `mcpServers` amendment.
+`.apm/` is the authoring source and the only thing apm deploys (ADR-0024). This plugin ships no agents.
 
 ## Author
 

plugins/bin/skills/caveman/README.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-# caveman
-
-Ultra-compressed output mode: drop articles, filler and pleasantries, keep the technical substance exact.
-
-## What it does
-
-Switches the agent into a terse register — no articles, no hedging, no pleasantries, fragments allowed, arrows for causality — while leaving technical terms, code blocks and quoted error strings untouched. The mode is *sticky*: once turned on it stays on for every subsequent response until the user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode", rather than decaying back to normal prose after a few turns.
-
-It carries one built-in escape hatch. Security warnings, confirmations for irreversible actions, multi-step sequences where fragment order could be misread, and any request to clarify are answered in normal prose, then the compressed register resumes.
-
-## Hand-invoked only
-
-`SKILL.md` sets `disable-model-invocation: true`. This is the single most important thing to know about this skill: **the model cannot route to it.** No other skill can hand off to it, and no phrasing in a user's request will cause it to be selected automatically. The only way in is the human typing `/caveman`.
-
-That is deliberate — output style is the user's choice, not an inference the router should make on their behalf. It is also why the description reads as one plain human-facing sentence rather than carrying the trigger phrasing and boundary clause a routable skill needs.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/caveman
-```
-
-Then keep working normally. To leave the mode, say "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — persistence rule, compression rules, worked examples, and the auto-clarity exception |

plugins/bin/skills/caveman/SKILL.md

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
----
-name: caveman
-disable-model-invocation: true
-description: >
-  Ultra-compressed output mode that drops articles, filler and pleasantries while
-  keeping technical substance exact, cutting token usage by roughly 75%.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-Respond terse like smart caveman. All technical substance stay. Only fluff die.
-
-## Persistence
-
-ACTIVE EVERY RESPONSE once user type `/caveman`. No revert after many turns. No filler drift. Still active if unsure. Off only when user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
-
-## Rules
-
-Drop: articles (a/an/the), filler (just/really/basically/actually/simply), pleasantries (sure/certainly/of course/happy to), hedging. Fragments OK. Short synonyms (big not extensive, fix not "implement a solution for"). Abbreviate common terms (DB/auth/config/req/res/fn/impl). Strip conjunctions. Use arrows for causality (X -> Y). One word when one word enough.
-
-Technical terms stay exact. Code blocks unchanged. Errors quoted exact.
-
-Pattern: `[thing] [action] [reason]. [next step].`
-
-Not: "Sure! I'd be happy to help you with that. The issue you're experiencing is likely caused by..."
-Yes: "Bug in auth middleware. Token expiry check use `<` not `<=`. Fix:"
-
-### Examples
-
-**"Why React component re-render?"**
-
-> Inline obj prop -> new ref -> re-render. `useMemo`.
-
-**"Explain database connection pooling."**
-
-> Pool = reuse DB conn. Skip handshake -> fast under load.
-
-## Auto-Clarity Exception
-
-Drop caveman temporarily for: security warnings, irreversible action confirmations, multi-step sequences where fragment order risks misread, user asks to clarify or repeats question. Resume caveman after clear part done.
-
-Example -- destructive op:
-
-> **Warning:** This will permanently delete all rows in the `users` table and cannot be undone.
->
-> ```sql
-> DROP TABLE users;
-> ```
->
-> Caveman resume. Verify backup exist first.

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# diagnose
-
-A six-phase discipline for hard bugs and performance regressions: feedback loop → reproduce → hypothesise → instrument → fix with a regression test → clean up.
-
-## What it does
-
-Imposes an order of operations on debugging so the agent cannot skip to guessing. The load-bearing phase is the first one: build a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug. Everything downstream — bisection, hypothesis testing, instrumentation — just consumes that signal, so the skill refuses to advance to Phase 2 without one, and says so explicitly rather than hypothesising blind.
-
-The remaining phases each carry a constraint worth knowing about: hypotheses are generated 3–5 at a time and must be falsifiable, so the first plausible idea cannot anchor the whole investigation; every debug log is tagged with a unique prefix (`[DEBUG-a4f2]`) so cleanup is a single grep; the regression test is written before the fix and only at a seam that exercises the real bug pattern; and the run closes by asking what would have prevented the bug, handing off to `improve-codebase-architecture` when the answer is architectural.
-
-Performance regressions take a branch of their own inside Phase 4 — baseline measurement and bisection, not logs.
-
-## Conditional reading
-
-Neither reference file is read on every run; `SKILL.md` names the condition for each.
-
-- `references/feedback-loops.md` is read when Phase 1 has no signal yet, or when the loop you have is slow or intermittent.
-- `references/regression-seams.md` is read when Phase 5 leaves you unsure whether the available seam is deep enough — or whether one exists at all.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/diagnose
-```
-
-Describe the bug or the regression. For filing and triaging a reported bug rather than diagnosing it, use `triage`; for test-first feature work, use `tdd`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The six phases and their gates — what must be true before each one ends |
-| `references/feedback-loops.md` | Loaded when Phase 1 has no loop or the loop is too weak: ten ways to construct one ordered by cost, how to sharpen an existing loop, handling intermittent bugs, and what to ask the user for when the bug resists reproduction |
-| `references/regression-seams.md` | Loaded when Phase 5 is unsure about the seam: what makes a seam correct, the four shapes of a too-shallow seam, and what to do when no correct seam exists |
-| `assets/hitl-loop.template.sh` | Copy-and-edit bash template for the last-resort human-in-the-loop feedback loop, cited by `references/feedback-loops.md`. Provides `step` and `capture` helpers and prints captured values as `KEY=VALUE` for the agent to parse |

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md

@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
----
-name: diagnose
-description: >
-  Use when the user says "diagnose this" or "debug this", reports something
-  broken, throwing, or failing, or says something got slow. Not filing or
-  triaging a reported bug -> `triage`. Not test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-# Diagnose
-
-A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.
-
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.
-
-## Phase 1 — Build a feedback loop
-
-**This is the skill.** Everything else is mechanical. If you have a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug, you will find the cause — bisection, hypothesis-testing, and instrumentation all just consume that signal. If you don't have one, no amount of staring at code will save you.
-
-Spend disproportionate effort here. **Be aggressive. Be creative. Refuse to give up.**
-
-**If you do not yet have such a signal, read `references/feedback-loops.md`** — ten ways to build one ordered by cost, and what to ask the user for when the bug resists reproduction entirely.
-
-**If you do have one, it is probably not sharp enough yet.** Make it faster and more deterministic, and make it assert on the exact symptom rather than "didn't crash" — a 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. If it stays slow or intermittent after that, read that file's "Iterate on the loop itself" and "Intermittent bugs" sections.
-
-Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a loop you believe in. If you cannot build one, stop and say so explicitly, listing what you tried — never hypothesise without a signal.
-
-## Phase 2 — Reproduce
-
-Run the loop. Watch the bug appear.
-
-Confirm:
-
-- [ ] The loop produces the failure mode the **user** described — not a different failure that happens to be nearby. Wrong bug = wrong fix.
-- [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs. If it is intermittent, `references/feedback-loops.md` defines the rate high enough to debug against — go back to Phase 1 and raise it.
-- [ ] You have captured the exact symptom (error message, wrong output, slow timing) so later phases can verify the fix actually addresses it.
-
-Do not proceed until you reproduce the bug.
-
-## Phase 3 — Hypothesise
-
-Generate **3–5 ranked hypotheses** before testing any of them. Single-hypothesis generation anchors on the first plausible idea.
-
-Each hypothesis must be **falsifiable**: state the prediction it makes.
-
-> Format: "If <X> is the cause, then <changing Y> will make the bug disappear / <changing Z> will make it worse."
-
-If you cannot state the prediction, the hypothesis is a vibe — discard or sharpen it.
-
-**Show the ranked list to the user before testing.** They often have domain knowledge that re-ranks instantly ("we just deployed a change to #3"), or know hypotheses they've already ruled out. Cheap checkpoint, big time saver. Don't block on it — proceed with your ranking if the user is AFK.
-
-## Phase 4 — Instrument
-
-Each probe must map to a specific prediction from Phase 3. **Change one variable at a time.**
-
-Tool preference:
-
-1. **Debugger / REPL inspection** if the env supports it. One breakpoint beats ten logs.
-2. **Targeted logs** at the boundaries that distinguish hypotheses.
-3. Never "log everything and grep".
-
-**Tag every debug log** with a unique prefix, e.g. `[DEBUG-a4f2]`. Cleanup at the end becomes a single grep. Untagged logs survive; tagged logs die.
-
-**Perf branch.** For performance regressions, logs are usually wrong. Instead: establish a baseline measurement (timing harness, `performance.now()`, profiler, query plan), then bisect. Measure first, fix second.
-
-## Phase 5 — Fix + regression test
-
-Write the regression test **before the fix** — but only at a **correct seam**: one where the test exercises the real bug pattern as it occurs at the call site. If the available seam looks too shallow, or you cannot tell whether it is, read `references/regression-seams.md`.
-
-**If no correct seam exists, that itself is the finding.** Note it and carry it into Phase 6 — the architecture is preventing the bug from being locked down.
-
-At a correct seam:
-
-1. Turn the Phase 1 loop into a failing test at that seam, narrowed to the symptom captured in Phase 2.
-2. Watch it fail.
-3. Apply the fix.
-4. Watch it pass.
-5. Re-run the Phase 1 feedback loop against the original, un-narrowed scenario.
-
-## Phase 6 — Cleanup + post-mortem
-
-Required before declaring done:
-
-- [ ] Original repro no longer reproduces (re-run the Phase 1 loop)
-- [ ] Regression test passes (or absence of seam is documented)
-- [ ] All `[DEBUG-...]` instrumentation removed (`grep` the prefix)
-- [ ] Throwaway prototypes deleted (or moved to a clearly-marked debug location)
-- [ ] The hypothesis that turned out correct is stated in the commit / PR message — so the next debugger learns
-
-**Then ask: what would have prevented this bug?** If the answer involves architectural change (no good test seam, tangled callers, hidden coupling) hand off to the `/improve-codebase-architecture` skill with the specifics. Make the recommendation **after** the fix is in, not before — you have more information now than when you started.

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/assets/hitl-loop.template.sh

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-#!/usr/bin/env bash
-# Human-in-the-loop reproduction loop.
-# Copy this file, edit the steps below, and run it.
-# The agent runs the script; the user follows prompts in their terminal.
-#
-# Usage:
-#   bash hitl-loop.template.sh
-#
-# Two helpers:
-#   step "<instruction>"          → show instruction, wait for Enter
-#   capture VAR "<question>"      → show question, read response into VAR
-#
-# At the end, captured values are printed as KEY=VALUE for the agent to parse.
-
-set -euo pipefail
-
-step() {
-  printf '\n>>> %s\n' "$1"
-  read -r -p "    [Enter when done] " _
-}
-
-capture() {
-  local var="$1" question="$2" answer
-  printf '\n>>> %s\n' "$question"
-  read -r -p "    > " answer
-  printf -v "$var" '%s' "$answer"
-}
-
-# --- edit below ---------------------------------------------------------
-
-step "Open the app at http://localhost:3000 and sign in."
-
-capture ERRORED "Click the 'Export' button. Did it throw an error? (y/n)"
-
-capture ERROR_MSG "Paste the error message (or 'none'):"
-
-# --- edit above ---------------------------------------------------------
-
-printf '\n--- Captured ---\n'
-printf 'ERRORED=%s\n' "$ERRORED"
-printf 'ERROR_MSG=%s\n' "$ERROR_MSG"

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/references/feedback-loops.md

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-# Constructing and sharpening a feedback loop
-
-A feedback loop is a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug. Build the right one and the bug is 90% fixed. This file covers the whole arc: building a loop, sharpening one you already have, and escalating when the bug resists reproduction.
-
-## Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
-
-1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
-2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server.
-3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
-4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
-5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
-6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
-7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
-8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it.
-9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
-10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `assets/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
-
-## Iterate on the loop itself
-
-Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, ask:
-
-- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.)
-- Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".)
-- Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)
-
-A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. A 2-second deterministic loop is a debugging superpower.
-
-## Intermittent bugs — raise the reproduction rate
-
-If the loop only sometimes fails, the goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not — keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.
-
-## When you genuinely cannot build a loop
-
-Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for:
-
-- access to whatever environment reproduces it,
-- a captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or
-- permission to add temporary production instrumentation.
-
-Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop. A hypothesis you cannot falsify against a signal is a guess, and the fix that follows it is unverifiable.

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/references/regression-seams.md

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-# Judging a regression-test seam
-
-Read this when Phase 5 leaves you unsure whether the seam available for the regression test is the correct one — either because the obvious seam looks shallow, or because there appears to be no seam at all.
-
-## What makes a seam correct
-
-A correct seam is one where the test exercises the **real bug pattern** as it occurs at the call site: the same entry point, the same participants, the same ordering, and the same state the real caller holds when it goes wrong.
-
-## Seams that are too shallow
-
-- A single-caller test when the bug only appears with multiple callers.
-- A unit test that cannot replicate the chain of calls that triggered the bug.
-- A test that reproduces the symptom by construction — asserting on a value the test itself set — rather than by driving the code path that produces it.
-- A test that mocks out the collaborator the bug actually lives in.
-
-A regression test at a shallow seam gives false confidence. It passes forever, including after a change reintroduces the bug at the real call site, and it will be read by the next maintainer as proof the bug is locked down.
-
-## When there is no correct seam
-
-Do not force one, and do not settle for a shallow seam to have something green. Instead:
-
-1. Apply the fix and verify it against the Phase 1 loop directly.
-2. Write down which seams you considered and why each was too shallow.
-3. Carry that into Phase 6's "what would have prevented this bug" question. A missing seam is an architecture finding — tangled callers, hidden coupling, or a module with no testable boundary — and the handoff is the `improve-codebase-architecture` skill, with those specifics attached.

plugins/bin/skills/grill-me/README.md

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-# grill-me
-
-Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until the decision tree is fully resolved.
-
-## What it does
-
-Turns the agent into an interviewer rather than an implementer. It walks the design tree branch by branch, resolving dependencies between decisions one at a time, and offers its own recommended answer alongside each question so the user has something concrete to push against. Two rules give it its shape: **one question at a time**, and **never ask what the codebase can answer** — if a question is settleable by reading the code, the agent goes and reads the code instead of spending the user's attention on it.
-
-## Composition
-
-This is the plain grilling loop, with no documentation side effects. The sibling `grill-with-docs` skill runs the same interview but additionally challenges answers against the project's `CONTEXT.md` glossary and existing ADRs, and writes decisions back into those files as they crystallise. Reach for that one when the project has a domain model worth defending; reach for this one when it does not, or when nothing should be written down yet.
-
-`triage` composes the documented variant, not this one, when an issue needs fleshing out.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/grill-me
-```
-
-Describe the plan or design to be stress-tested. Expect questions one at a time, each with a recommended answer.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — the interview instruction, the one-question-at-a-time rule, and the explore-instead-of-asking rule |

plugins/bin/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
----
-name: grill-me
-description: >
-  Use when the user says "grill me" or wants a plan or design stress-tested by
-  relentless interview — one question at a time, down each branch of the
-  decision tree. Not a plan to challenge against `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs ->
-  `grill-with-docs`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
-
-Ask the questions one at a time.
-
-If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.

plugins/bin/skills/grill-with-docs/README.md

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-# grill-with-docs
-
-The grilling interview, run against the project's domain model — and writing decisions back into `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs as they land.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs the same relentless one-question-at-a-time interview as `grill-me`, with the project's own documentation as an active participant. During codebase exploration it also locates the domain documentation — a root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`, or a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` pointing at per-context glossaries and ADR directories in a multi-context repo — and then uses it five ways:
-
-- **Challenges terms against the glossary.** When the user's usage conflicts with what `CONTEXT.md` already defines, that is raised immediately rather than absorbed.
-- **Sharpens fuzzy language** by proposing a precise canonical term ("you're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User?").
-- **Stress-tests domain relationships with concrete scenarios**, inventing edge cases that force the user to be precise about where one concept ends and the next begins.
-- **Cross-references claims against the code**, and surfaces contradictions between what the user says happens and what the code does.
-- **Updates `CONTEXT.md` inline**, the moment a term is resolved, rather than batching changes to the end of the session where they get lost.
-
-Files are created lazily — only when there is something real to write.
-
-ADRs are offered *sparingly*, and only when all three tests pass: the decision is hard to reverse, it would surprise a future reader without the context, and it was a genuine trade-off with real alternatives. Missing any one of the three means no ADR.
-
-## Composition
-
-`grill-me` is the same interview without the documentation side effects — use it when there is no domain model to defend or nothing should be written down yet. `triage` composes this skill (not `grill-me`) at step 4 when an issue needs fleshing out. `improve-codebase-architecture` runs its own grilling loop and borrows this skill's `CONTEXT.md` and ADR discipline for the decisions that come out of it.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/grill-with-docs
-```
-
-Describe the plan or design. Expect questions one at a time, each with a recommended answer, and expect `CONTEXT.md` to be edited during the session rather than after it.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The interview instruction plus the domain-awareness rules: file layout discovery, the five during-session behaviours, and the three-part ADR test |
-| `references/context-format.md` | Cited when a term is resolved: the structure of a `CONTEXT.md` and how to write a Language entry |
-| `references/adr-format.md` | Cited when an ADR is offered: `docs/adr/` naming, sequential numbering, and the ADR template |

plugins/bin/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
----
-name: grill-with-docs
-description: >
-  Use when a plan should be stress-tested against the project's domain model —
-  the interview challenges terms against `CONTEXT.md` and writes decisions into
-  it and into ADRs as they land. Not a plain interview -> `grill-me`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-<what-to-do>
-
-Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
-
-Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
-
-If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
-
-</what-to-do>
-
-<supporting-info>
-
-## Domain awareness
-
-During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
-
-### File structure
-
-Most repos have a single context:
-
-```
-/
-├── CONTEXT.md
-├── docs/
-│   └── adr/
-│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
-│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
-└── src/
-```
-
-If a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
-
-```
-/
-├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
-├── docs/
-│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
-├── src/
-│   ├── ordering/
-│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md
-│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
-│   └── billing/
-│       ├── CONTEXT.md
-│       └── docs/adr/
-```
-
-Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no `CONTEXT.md` exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no `docs/adr/` exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
-
-## During the session
-
-### Challenge against the glossary
-
-When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in `CONTEXT.md`, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
-
-### Sharpen fuzzy language
-
-When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
-
-### Discuss concrete scenarios
-
-When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
-
-### Cross-reference with code
-
-When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
-
-### Update CONTEXT.md inline
-
-When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [context-format.md](references/context-format.md).
-
-Don't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
-
-### Offer ADRs sparingly
-
-Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
-
-1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
-2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
-3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
-
-If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [adr-format.md](references/adr-format.md).
-
-</supporting-info>

plugins/bin/skills/grill-with-docs/references/adr-format.md

@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-# ADR Format
-
-ADRs live in `docs/adr/` and use sequential numbering: `0001-slug.md`, `0002-slug.md`, etc.
-
-Create the `docs/adr/` directory lazily — only when the first ADR is needed.
-
-## Template
-
-```md
-# {Short title of the decision}
-
-{1-3 sentences: what's the context, what did we decide, and why.}
-```
-
-That's it. An ADR can be a single paragraph. The value is in recording *that* a decision was made and *why* — not in filling out sections.
-
-## Optional sections
-
-Only include these when they add genuine value. Most ADRs won't need them.
-
-- **Status** frontmatter (`proposed | accepted | deprecated | superseded by ADR-NNNN`) — useful when decisions are revisited
-- **Considered Options** — only when the rejected alternatives are worth remembering
-- **Consequences** — only when non-obvious downstream effects need to be called out
-
-## Numbering
-
-Scan `docs/adr/` for the highest existing number and increment by one.
-
-## When to offer an ADR
-
-All three of these must be true:
-
-1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
-2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will look at the code and wonder "why on earth did they do it this way?"
-3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
-
-If a decision is easy to reverse, skip it — you'll just reverse it. If it's not surprising, nobody will wonder why. If there was no real alternative, there's nothing to record beyond "we did the obvious thing."
-
-### What qualifies
-
-- **Architectural shape.** "We're using a monorepo." "The write model is event-sourced, the read model is projected into Postgres."
-- **Integration patterns between contexts.** "Ordering and Billing communicate via domain events, not synchronous HTTP."
-- **Technology choices that carry lock-in.** Database, message bus, auth provider, deployment target. Not every library — just the ones that would take a quarter to swap out.
-- **Boundary and scope decisions.** "Customer data is owned by the Customer context; other contexts reference it by ID only." The explicit no-s are as valuable as the yes-s.
-- **Deliberate deviations from the obvious path.** "We're using manual SQL instead of an ORM because X." Anything where a reasonable reader would assume the opposite. These stop the next engineer from "fixing" something that was deliberate.
-- **Constraints not visible in the code.** "We can't use AWS because of compliance requirements." "Response times must be under 200ms because of the partner API contract."
-- **Rejected alternatives when the rejection is non-obvious.** If you considered GraphQL and picked REST for subtle reasons, record it — otherwise someone will suggest GraphQL again in six months.

plugins/bin/skills/grill-with-docs/references/context-format.md

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-# CONTEXT.md Format
-
-## Structure
-
-```md
-# {Context Name}
-
-{One or two sentence description of what this context is and why it exists.}
-
-## Language
-
-**Order**:
-{A concise description of the term}
-_Avoid_: Purchase, transaction
-
-**Invoice**:
-A request for payment sent to a customer after delivery.
-_Avoid_: Bill, payment request
-
-**Customer**:
-A person or organization that places orders.
-_Avoid_: Client, buyer, account
-
-## Relationships
-
-- An **Order** produces one or more **Invoices**
-- An **Invoice** belongs to exactly one **Customer**
-
-## Example dialogue
-
-> **Dev:** "When a **Customer** places an **Order**, do we create the **Invoice** immediately?"
-> **Domain expert:** "No — an **Invoice** is only generated once a **Fulfillment** is confirmed."
-
-## Flagged ambiguities
-
-- "account" was used to mean both **Customer** and **User** — resolved: these are distinct concepts.
-```
-
-## Rules
-
-- **Be opinionated.** When multiple words exist for the same concept, pick the best one and list the others as aliases to avoid.
-- **Flag conflicts explicitly.** If a term is used ambiguously, call it out in "Flagged ambiguities" with a clear resolution.
-- **Keep definitions tight.** One sentence max. Define what it IS, not what it does.
-- **Show relationships.** Use bold term names and express cardinality where obvious.
-- **Only include terms specific to this project's context.** General programming concepts (timeouts, error types, utility patterns) don't belong even if the project uses them extensively. Before adding a term, ask: is this a concept unique to this context, or a general programming concept? Only the former belongs.
-- **Group terms under subheadings** when natural clusters emerge. If all terms belong to a single cohesive area, a flat list is fine.
-- **Write an example dialogue.** A conversation between a dev and a domain expert that demonstrates how the terms interact naturally and clarifies boundaries between related concepts.
-
-## Single vs multi-context repos
-
-**Single context (most repos):** One `CONTEXT.md` at the repo root.
-
-**Multiple contexts:** A `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the repo root lists the contexts, where they live, and how they relate to each other:
-
-```md
-# Context Map
-
-## Contexts
-
-- [Ordering](./src/ordering/CONTEXT.md) — receives and tracks customer orders
-- [Billing](./src/billing/CONTEXT.md) — generates invoices and processes payments
-- [Fulfillment](./src/fulfillment/CONTEXT.md) — manages warehouse picking and shipping
-
-## Relationships
-
-- **Ordering → Fulfillment**: Ordering emits `OrderPlaced` events; Fulfillment consumes them to start picking
-- **Fulfillment → Billing**: Fulfillment emits `ShipmentDispatched` events; Billing consumes them to generate invoices
-- **Ordering ↔ Billing**: Shared types for `CustomerId` and `Money`
-```
-
-The skill infers which structure applies:
-
-- If `CONTEXT-MAP.md` exists, read it to find contexts
-- If only a root `CONTEXT.md` exists, single context
-- If neither exists, create a root `CONTEXT.md` lazily when the first term is resolved
-
-When multiple contexts exist, infer which one the current topic relates to. If unclear, ask.

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/README.md

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-# improve-codebase-architecture
-
-Surface architectural friction and propose deepening opportunities — refactors that turn shallow modules into deep ones.
-
-## What it does
-
-Looks for places where a codebase is hard to understand, hard to test, or hard for an agent to navigate, and proposes refactors that concentrate behaviour behind smaller interfaces. It runs in three stages:
-
-1. **Explore.** Reads the domain glossary and any ADRs in the area first, then walks the codebase with an `Explore` sub-agent — organically, noting friction rather than applying fixed heuristics. The **deletion test** is the filter: imagine deleting the module; if complexity vanishes it was a pass-through, if complexity reappears across N callers it was earning its keep.
-2. **Present candidates.** A numbered list, each with files, problem, solution and benefits — benefits stated in terms of *locality* and *leverage* and of how tests would improve. No interfaces are proposed yet; the user picks one.
-3. **Grilling loop.** Walks the design tree for the chosen candidate, with documentation side effects landing inline as decisions crystallise.
-
-The skill is opinionated about vocabulary, and that is the point: **module, interface, implementation, depth, seam, adapter, leverage, locality**, used exactly, with no drift into "component", "service", "API" or "boundary". Domain nouns come from `CONTEXT.md`, architecture nouns from `references/language.md` — so a proposal reads as "the Order intake module", never "the FooBarHandler".
-
-ADRs are treated as decisions not to be re-litigated. A candidate that contradicts one is surfaced only when the friction is real enough to warrant reopening it, and is marked as such.
-
-## Composition
-
-`diagnose` hands off here when a bug's post-mortem concludes that no correct test seam exists, or that callers are tangled — the recommendation is made after the fix is in, not before. The grilling loop follows `grill-with-docs`'s discipline for `CONTEXT.md` entries and ADR offers, and `SKILL.md` names that skill's format documents directly.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/improve-codebase-architecture
-```
-
-Point at a codebase or an area of one. Expect a numbered candidate list and a "which of these would you like to explore?" before any interface design happens.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Condensed glossary, key principles, and the three-stage process |
-| `references/language.md` | Cited throughout `SKILL.md`: full definitions of every term, the words each one replaces, and the full principle list |
-| `references/interface-design.md` | Read at stage 3 when the user wants alternative interfaces explored: the parallel sub-agent "Design It Twice" pattern, framing the problem space, and the per-agent design constraints |
-| `references/deepening.md` | Cited from `references/interface-design.md`: how to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, the four dependency categories (in-process, local-substitutable, remote-but-owned, true external), seam discipline, and the replace-don't-layer testing strategy |

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
----
-name: improve-codebase-architecture
-description: >
-  Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring
-  opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more
-  testable and AI-navigable — deepening opportunities that turn shallow modules
-  into deep ones, informed by `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a
-  failure -> `diagnose`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-# Improve Codebase Architecture
-
-Surface architectural friction and propose **deepening opportunities** — refactors that turn shallow modules into deep ones. The aim is testability and AI-navigability.
-
-## Glossary
-
-Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary."
-
-- **Module** — anything with an interface and an implementation (function, class, package, slice).
-- **Interface** — everything a caller must know to use the module: types, invariants, error modes, ordering, config. Not just the type signature.
-- **Implementation** — the code inside.
-- **Depth** — leverage at the interface: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface. **Deep** = high leverage. **Shallow** = interface nearly as complex as the implementation.
-- **Seam** — where an interface lives; a place behaviour can be altered without editing in place. (Use this, not "boundary.")
-- **Adapter** — a concrete thing satisfying an interface at a seam.
-- **Leverage** — what callers get from depth.
-- **Locality** — what maintainers get from depth: change, bugs, knowledge concentrated in one place.
-
-Key principles:
-
-- **Deletion test**: imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
-- **The interface is the test surface.**
-- **One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam.**
-
-If a term or principle above is ambiguous in the case in front of you, or you need the definitions and the principles the two lists leave out, read `references/language.md`.
-
-This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. Explore
-
-Read the project's domain glossary and any ADRs in the area you're touching first.
-
-Then use the Agent tool with `subagent_type=Explore` to walk the codebase. Don't follow rigid heuristics — explore organically and note where you experience friction:
-
-- Where does understanding one concept require bouncing between many small modules?
-- Where are modules **shallow** — interface nearly as complex as the implementation?
-- Where have pure functions been extracted just for testability, but the real bugs hide in how they're called (no **locality**)?
-- Where do tightly-coupled modules leak across their seams?
-- Which parts of the codebase are untested, or hard to test through their current interface?
-
-Apply the **deletion test** to anything you suspect is shallow: would deleting it concentrate complexity, or just move it? A "yes, concentrates" is the signal you want.
-
-### 2. Present candidates
-
-Present a numbered list of deepening opportunities. For each candidate:
-
-- **Files** — which files/modules are involved
-- **Problem** — why the current architecture is causing friction
-- **Solution** — plain English description of what would change
-- **Benefits** — explained in terms of locality and leverage, and also in how tests would improve
-
-**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and the architecture glossary above for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
-
-**ADR conflicts**: if a candidate contradicts an existing ADR, only surface it when the friction is real enough to warrant revisiting the ADR. Mark it clearly (e.g. _"contradicts ADR-0007 — but worth reopening because…"_). Don't list every theoretical refactor an ADR forbids.
-
-Do NOT propose interfaces yet. Ask the user: "Which of these would you like to explore?"
-
-### 3. Grilling loop
-
-Once the user picks a candidate, drop into a grilling conversation. Walk the design tree with them — constraints, dependencies, the shape of the deepened module, what sits behind the seam, what tests survive.
-
-Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
-
-- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `references/context-format.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
-- **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `CONTEXT.md` right there.
-- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `references/adr-format.md`.
-- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** Read `references/interface-design.md`.

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/deepening.md

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-# Deepening
-
-How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
-
-## Dependency categories
-
-When assessing a candidate for deepening, classify its dependencies. The category determines how the deepened module is tested across its seam.
-
-### 1. In-process
-
-Pure computation, in-memory state, no I/O. Always deepenable — merge the modules and test through the new interface directly. No adapter needed.
-
-### 2. Local-substitutable
-
-Dependencies that have local test stand-ins (PGLite for Postgres, in-memory filesystem). Deepenable if the stand-in exists. The deepened module is tested with the stand-in running in the test suite. The seam is internal; no port at the module's external interface.
-
-### 3. Remote but owned (Ports & Adapters)
-
-Your own services across a network boundary (microservices, internal APIs). Define a **port** (interface) at the seam. The deep module owns the logic; the transport is injected as an **adapter**. Tests use an in-memory adapter. Production uses an HTTP/gRPC/queue adapter.
-
-Recommendation shape: *"Define a port at the seam, implement an HTTP adapter for production and an in-memory adapter for testing, so the logic sits in one deep module even though it's deployed across a network."*
-
-### 4. True external (Mock)
-
-Third-party services (Stripe, Twilio, etc.) you don't control. The deepened module takes the external dependency as an injected port; tests provide a mock adapter.
-
-## Seam discipline
-
-- **One adapter means a hypothetical seam. Two adapters means a real one.** Don't introduce a port unless at least two adapters are justified (typically production + test). A single-adapter seam is just indirection.
-- **Internal seams vs external seams.** A deep module can have internal seams (private to its implementation, used by its own tests) as well as the external seam at its interface. Don't expose internal seams through the interface just because tests use them.
-
-## Testing strategy: replace, don't layer
-
-- Old unit tests on shallow modules become waste once tests at the deepened module's interface exist — delete them.
-- Write new tests at the deepened module's interface. The **interface is the test surface**.
-- Tests assert on observable outcomes through the interface, not internal state.
-- Tests should survive internal refactors — they describe behaviour, not implementation. If a test has to change when the implementation changes, it's testing past the interface.

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/interface-design.md

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-# Interface Design
-
-When the user wants to explore alternative interfaces for a chosen deepening candidate, use this parallel sub-agent pattern. Based on "Design It Twice" (Ousterhout) — your first idea is unlikely to be the best.
-
-Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. Frame the problem space
-
-Before spawning sub-agents, write a user-facing explanation of the problem space for the chosen candidate:
-
-- The constraints any new interface would need to satisfy
-- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
-- A rough illustrative code sketch to ground the constraints — not a proposal, just a way to make the constraints concrete
-
-Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and thinks while the sub-agents work in parallel.
-
-### 2. Spawn sub-agents
-
-Spawn 3+ sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each must produce a **radically different** interface for the deepened module.
-
-Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [deepening.md](deepening.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
-
-- Agent 1: "Minimize the interface — aim for 1–3 entry points max. Maximise leverage per entry point."
-- Agent 2: "Maximise flexibility — support many use cases and extension."
-- Agent 3: "Optimise for the most common caller — make the default case trivial."
-- Agent 4 (if applicable): "Design around ports & adapters for cross-seam dependencies."
-
-Include both [language.md](language.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
-
-Each sub-agent outputs:
-
-1. Interface (types, methods, params — plus invariants, ordering, error modes)
-2. Usage example showing how callers use it
-3. What the implementation hides behind the seam
-4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
-5. Trade-offs — where leverage is high, where it's thin
-
-### 3. Present and compare
-
-Present designs sequentially so the user can absorb each one, then compare them in prose. Contrast by **depth** (leverage at the interface), **locality** (where change concentrates), and **seam placement**.
-
-After comparing, give your own recommendation: which design you think is strongest and why. If elements from different designs would combine well, propose a hybrid. Be opinionated — the user wants a strong read, not a menu.

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/language.md

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-# Language
-
-Shared vocabulary for every suggestion this skill makes. Use these terms exactly — don't substitute "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Consistent language is the whole point.
-
-## Terms
-
-**Module**
-Anything with an interface and an implementation. Deliberately scale-agnostic — applies equally to a function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice.
-_Avoid_: unit, component, service.
-
-**Interface**
-Everything a caller must know to use the module correctly. Includes the type signature, but also invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, required configuration, and performance characteristics.
-_Avoid_: API, signature (too narrow — those refer only to the type-level surface).
-
-**Implementation**
-What's inside a module — its body of code. Distinct from **Adapter**: a thing can be a small adapter with a large implementation (a Postgres repo) or a large adapter with a small implementation (an in-memory fake). Reach for "adapter" when the seam is the topic; "implementation" otherwise.
-
-**Depth**
-Leverage at the interface — the amount of behaviour a caller (or test) can exercise per unit of interface they have to learn. A module is **deep** when a large amount of behaviour sits behind a small interface. A module is **shallow** when the interface is nearly as complex as the implementation.
-
-**Seam** _(from Michael Feathers)_
-A place where you can alter behaviour without editing in that place. The *location* at which a module's interface lives. Choosing where to put the seam is its own design decision, distinct from what goes behind it.
-_Avoid_: boundary (overloaded with DDD's bounded context).
-
-**Adapter**
-A concrete thing that satisfies an interface at a seam. Describes *role* (what slot it fills), not substance (what's inside).
-
-**Leverage**
-What callers get from depth. More capability per unit of interface they have to learn. One implementation pays back across N call sites and M tests.
-
-**Locality**
-What maintainers get from depth. Change, bugs, knowledge, and verification concentrate at one place rather than spreading across callers. Fix once, fixed everywhere.
-
-## Principles
-
-- **Depth is a property of the interface, not the implementation.** A deep module can be internally composed of small, mockable, swappable parts — they just aren't part of the interface. A module can have **internal seams** (private to its implementation, used by its own tests) as well as the **external seam** at its interface.
-- **The deletion test.** Imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, the module wasn't hiding anything (it was a pass-through). If complexity reappears across N callers, the module was earning its keep.
-- **The interface is the test surface.** Callers and tests cross the same seam. If you want to test *past* the interface, the module is probably the wrong shape.
-- **One adapter means a hypothetical seam. Two adapters means a real one.** Don't introduce a seam unless something actually varies across it.
-
-## Relationships
-
-- A **Module** has exactly one **Interface** (the surface it presents to callers and tests).
-- **Depth** is a property of a **Module**, measured against its **Interface**.
-- A **Seam** is where a **Module**'s **Interface** lives.
-- An **Adapter** sits at a **Seam** and satisfies the **Interface**.
-- **Depth** produces **Leverage** for callers and **Locality** for maintainers.
-
-## Rejected framings
-
-- **Depth as ratio of implementation-lines to interface-lines** (Ousterhout): rewards padding the implementation. We use depth-as-leverage instead.
-- **"Interface" as the TypeScript `interface` keyword or a class's public methods**: too narrow — interface here includes every fact a caller must know.
-- **"Boundary"**: overloaded with DDD's bounded context. Say **seam** or **interface**.

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/README.md

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# prototype
-
-Build a throwaway prototype that answers one design question — either a runnable terminal app or several UI variations.
-
-## What it does
-
-Treats a prototype as **throwaway code that answers a question**, and lets the question decide the artifact. `SKILL.md` opens with a two-row dispatch table and the run resolves exactly one row before doing anything else:
-
-- *"Does this logic / state model feel right?"* → a tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through the cases that are hard to reason about on paper.
-- *"What should this look like?"* → several radically different UI variations on one route, switchable from a floating bottom bar via a URL search param.
-
-The two branches produce fundamentally different artifacts, so picking wrong wastes the whole prototype. When the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user is unreachable, the skill defaults on the shape of the surrounding code (backend module → logic, page or component → UI) and states the assumption at the top of the prototype rather than silently choosing.
-
-Six rules apply to both branches: throwaway and visibly named as such, one command to run, no persistence by default, no polish, surface the full state after every action or variant switch, and delete or absorb the prototype when it is done. The *answer* is the only durable output — the skill captures it in a commit message, ADR, issue or `NOTES.md` before the code is deleted.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/prototype
-```
-
-State the design question. For production code, use `tdd`; for talking a design through without building anything, use `grill-me`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The branch dispatch table and the rules that apply to both branches |
-| `references/logic.md` | The logic branch, read only when that row is selected: when it is the right shape, and how to build the interactive terminal app |
-| `references/ui.md` | The UI branch, read only when that row is selected: when it is the right shape, and how to build and switch between the variations |
-
-Each reference is self-contained — a run reads one of the two, never both.

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/SKILL.md

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
----
-name: prototype
-description: >
-  Use when the user wants a throwaway prototype to answer a design question about
-  a data model, state machine or business logic, or to mock up a UI in several
-  variations. Not production code -> `tdd`. Not talking a design through ->
-  `grill-me`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-# Prototype
-
-A prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides the shape.
-
-## Pick a branch
-
-| Question being answered | Build | Reference |
-|---|---|---|
-| "Does this logic / state model feel right?" | A tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper | `references/logic.md` |
-| "What should this look like?" | Several radically different UI variations on one route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar | `references/ui.md` |
-
-Resolve the row from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around, then read only that reference — each is self-contained.
-
-The two branches produce fundamentally different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.
-
-## Rules that apply to both
-
-1. **Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such.** Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious — but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure.
-2. **One command to run.** Whatever the project's existing task runner supports — `pnpm <name>`, `python <path>`, `bun <path>`, etc. The user must be able to start it without thinking.
-3. **No persistence by default.** State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is *checking*, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear "PROTOTYPE — wipe me" name.
-4. **Skip the polish.** No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype *runnable*, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast and then delete it.
-5. **Surface the state.** After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed.
-6. **Delete or absorb when done.** When the prototype has answered its question, either delete it or fold the validated decision into the real code — don't leave it rotting in the repo.
-
-## When done
-
-The *answer* is the only thing worth keeping from a prototype. Capture it somewhere durable (commit message, ADR, issue, or a `NOTES.md` next to the prototype) along with the question it was answering. If the user is around, that capture is a quick conversation; if not, leave the placeholder so they (or you, on the next pass) can fill in the verdict before deleting the prototype.

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/references/logic.md

@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
-# Logic Prototype
-
-A tiny interactive terminal app that lets the user drive a state model by hand. Use this when the question is about **business logic, state transitions, or data shape** — the kind of thing that looks reasonable on paper but only feels wrong once you push it through real cases.
-
-## When this is the right shape
-
-- "I'm not sure if this state machine handles the edge case where X then Y."
-- "Does this data model actually let me represent the case where..."
-- "I want to feel out what the API should look like before writing it."
-- Anything where the user wants to **press buttons and watch state change**.
-
-If the question is "what should this look like" — wrong branch. Read `references/ui.md`.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. State the question
-
-Before writing code, write down what state model and what question you're prototyping. One paragraph, in the prototype's README or a comment at the top of the file. A logic prototype that answers the wrong question is pure waste — make the question explicit so it can be checked later, whether the user is watching now or returning to it AFK.
-
-### 2. Pick the language
-
-Use whatever the host project uses. If the project has no obvious runtime (e.g. a docs repo), ask.
-
-Match the project's existing conventions for tooling — don't add a new package manager or runtime just for the prototype.
-
-### 3. Isolate the logic in a portable module
-
-Put the actual logic — the bit that's answering the question — behind a small, pure interface that could be lifted out and dropped into the real codebase later. The TUI around it is throwaway; the logic module shouldn't be.
-
-The right shape depends on the question:
-
-- **A pure reducer** — `(state, action) => state`. Good when actions are discrete events and state is a single value.
-- **A state machine** — explicit states and transitions. Good when "which actions are even legal right now" is part of the question.
-- **A small set of pure functions** over a plain data type. Good when there's no implicit current state — just transformations.
-- **A class or module with a clear method surface** when the logic genuinely owns ongoing internal state.
-
-Pick whichever shape best fits the question being asked, *not* whichever is easiest to wire to a TUI. Keep it pure: no I/O, no terminal code, no `console.log` for control flow. The TUI imports it and calls into it; nothing flows the other direction.
-
-This is what makes the prototype useful past its own lifetime. When the question's been answered, the validated reducer / machine / function set can be lifted into the real module — the TUI shell gets deleted.
-
-### 4. Build the smallest TUI that exposes the state
-
-Build it as a **lightweight TUI** — on every tick, clear the screen (`console.clear()` / `print("\033[2J\033[H")` / equivalent) and re-render the whole frame. The user should always see one stable view, not an ever-growing scrollback.
-
-Each frame has two parts, in this order:
-
-1. **Current state**, pretty-printed and diff-friendly (one field per line, or formatted JSON). Use **bold** for field names or section headers and **dim** for less important context (timestamps, IDs, derived values). Native ANSI escape codes are fine — `\x1b[1m` bold, `\x1b[2m` dim, `\x1b[0m` reset. No need to pull in a styling library unless one is already in the project.
-2. **Keyboard shortcuts**, listed at the bottom: `[a] add user  [d] delete user  [t] tick clock  [q] quit`. Bold the key, dim the description, or vice-versa — whatever reads cleanly.
-
-Behaviour:
-
-1. **Initialise state** — a single in-memory object/struct. Render the first frame on start.
-2. **Read one keystroke (or one line)** at a time, dispatch to a handler that mutates state.
-3. **Re-render** the full frame after every action — don't append, replace.
-4. **Loop until quit.**
-
-The whole frame should fit on one screen.
-
-### 5. Make it runnable in one command
-
-Add a script to the project's existing task runner (`package.json` scripts, `Makefile`, `justfile`, `pyproject.toml`). The user should run `pnpm run <prototype-name>` or equivalent — never need to remember a path.
-
-If the host project has no task runner, just put the command at the top of the prototype's README.
-
-### 6. Hand it over
-
-Give the user the run command. They'll drive it themselves; the interesting moments are when they say "wait, that shouldn't be possible" or "huh, I assumed X would be different" — those are the bugs in the _idea_, which is the whole point. If they want new actions added, add them. Prototypes evolve.
-
-### 7. Capture the answer
-
-When the prototype has done its job, the answer to the question is the only thing worth keeping. If the user is around, ask what it taught them. If not, leave a `NOTES.md` next to the prototype so the answer can be filled in (or filled in by you, if you've watched the session) before the prototype gets deleted.
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-- **Don't add tests.** A prototype that needs tests is no longer a prototype.
-- **Don't wire it to the real database.** Use an in-memory store unless the question is specifically about persistence.
-- **Don't generalise.** No "what if we wanted to support X later." The prototype answers one question.
-- **Don't blur the logic and the TUI together.** If the reducer / state machine references `console.log`, prompts, or terminal escape codes, it's no longer portable. Keep the TUI as a thin shell over a pure module.
-- **Don't ship the TUI shell into production.** The shell is optimised for being driven by hand from a terminal. The logic module behind it is the bit worth keeping.

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/references/ui.md

@@ -1,112 +0,0 @@
-# UI Prototype
-
-Generate **several radically different UI variations** on a single route, switchable from a floating bottom bar. The user flips between variants in the browser, picks one (or steals bits from each), then throws the rest away.
-
-If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Read `references/logic.md`.
-
-## When this is the right shape
-
-- "What should this page look like?"
-- "I want to see a few options for this dashboard before committing."
-- "Try a different layout for the settings screen."
-- Any time the user would otherwise spend a day picking between three vague mockups in their head.
-
-## Two sub-shapes — strongly prefer sub-shape A
-
-A UI prototype is much easier to judge when it's **butting up against the rest of the app** — real header, real sidebar, real data, real density. A throwaway route on its own is a vacuum: every variant looks fine in isolation. Default to sub-shape A whenever there's a plausible existing page to host the variants. Only reach for sub-shape B if the prototype genuinely has no nearby home.
-
-### Sub-shape A — adjustment to an existing page (preferred)
-
-The route already exists. Variants are rendered **on the same route**, gated by a `?variant=` URL search param. The existing data fetching, params, and auth all stay — only the rendering swaps. This is the default; pick it unless there's a specific reason not to.
-
-If the prototype is for something that doesn't yet have a page but *would naturally live inside one* (a new section of the dashboard, a new card on the settings screen, a new step in an existing flow) — that's still sub-shape A. Mount the variants inside the host page.
-
-### Sub-shape B — a new page (last resort)
-
-Only use this when the thing being prototyped genuinely has no existing page to live inside — e.g. an entirely new top-level surface, or a flow that can't be embedded anywhere sensible.
-
-Create a **throwaway route** following whatever routing convention the project already uses — don't invent a new top-level structure. Name it so it's obviously a prototype (e.g. include the word `prototype` in the path or filename). Same `?variant=` pattern.
-
-Before committing to sub-shape B, sanity-check: is there really no existing page this could be embedded in? An empty route hides design problems that a populated one would expose.
-
-In both sub-shapes the floating bottom bar is identical.
-
-## Process
-
-### 1. State the question and pick N
-
-Default to **3 variants**. More than 5 stops being radically different and starts being noise — cap there.
-
-Write down the plan in one line, in the prototype's location or a top-of-file comment:
-
-> "Three variants of the settings page, switchable via `?variant=`, on the existing `/settings` route."
-
-This works whether the user is here to push back or not.
-
-### 2. Generate radically different variants
-
-Draft each variant. Hold each one to:
-
-- The page's purpose and the data it has access to.
-- The project's component library / styling system (TailwindCSS, shadcn, MUI, plain CSS, whatever).
-- A clear exported component name, e.g. `VariantA`, `VariantB`, `VariantC`.
-
-Variants must be **structurally different** — different layout, different information hierarchy, different primary affordance, not just different colours. Three slightly-tweaked card grids isn't a UI prototype, it's wallpaper. If two drafts come out too similar, redo one with explicit "do not use a card grid" guidance.
-
-### 3. Wire them together
-
-Create a single switcher component on the route:
-
-```tsx
-// pseudo-code — adapt to the project's framework
-const variant = searchParams.get('variant') ?? 'A';
-return (
-  <>
-    {variant === 'A' && <VariantA {...data} />}
-    {variant === 'B' && <VariantB {...data} />}
-    {variant === 'C' && <VariantC {...data} />}
-    <PrototypeSwitcher variants={['A','B','C']} current={variant} />
-  </>
-);
-```
-
-For sub-shape A (existing page): keep all the existing data fetching above the switcher; only the rendered subtree changes per variant.
-
-For sub-shape B (new page): the throwaway route under `/prototype/<name>` mounts the same switcher.
-
-### 4. Build the floating switcher
-
-A small fixed-position bar at the bottom-centre of the screen with three pieces:
-
-- **Left arrow** — cycles to the previous variant (wraps around).
-- **Variant label** — shows the current variant key and, if the variant exports a name, that name too. e.g. `B — Sidebar layout`.
-- **Right arrow** — cycles forward (wraps around).
-
-Behaviour:
-
-- Clicking an arrow updates the URL search param (use the framework's router — `router.replace` on Next, `navigate` on React Router, etc) so the variant is shareable and reload-stable.
-- Keyboard: `←` and `→` arrow keys also cycle. Don't intercept arrow keys when an `<input>`, `<textarea>`, or `[contenteditable]` is focused.
-- Visually distinct from the page (e.g. high-contrast pill, subtle shadow) so it's obviously not part of the design being evaluated.
-- Hidden in production builds — gate on `process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production'` or an equivalent check, so a stray prototype merge can't ship the bar to users.
-
-Put the switcher in a single shared component so both sub-shapes can reuse it. Locate it wherever shared UI lives in the project.
-
-### 5. Hand it over
-
-Surface the URL (and the `?variant=` keys). The user will flip through whenever they get to it. The interesting feedback is usually **"I want the header from B with the sidebar from C"** — that's the actual design they want.
-
-### 6. Capture the answer and clean up
-
-Once a variant has won, write down which one and why (commit message, ADR, issue, or a `NOTES.md` next to the prototype if running AFK and the user hasn't responded yet). Then:
-
-- **Sub-shape A** — delete the losing variants and the switcher; fold the winner into the existing page.
-- **Sub-shape B** — promote the winning variant to a real route, delete the throwaway route and the switcher.
-
-Don't leave variant components or the switcher lying around. They rot fast and confuse the next reader.
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-- **Variants that differ only in colour or copy.** That's a tweak, not a prototype. Real variants disagree about structure.
-- **Sharing too much code between variants.** A shared `<Header>` is fine; a shared `<Layout>` defeats the point. Each variant should be free to throw out the layout.
-- **Wiring variants to real mutations.** Read-only prototypes are fine. If a variant needs to mutate, point it at a stub — the question is "what should this look like", not "does the backend work".
-- **Promoting the prototype directly to production.** The variant code was written under prototype constraints (no tests, minimal error handling). Rewrite it properly when you fold it in.

plugins/bin/skills/research/README.md

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-# research
-
-Research a tool, library or API from canonical documentation into a directory of structured per-topic reference files.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs a six-step pipeline: scope against the working directory (what version is actually in use, what is already documented), resolve the topic through Context7, websearch for canonical docs covering whatever Context7 missed, read those sources, deepen one level into the links worth following, then write one markdown file per topic area plus a `sources.md` provenance record.
-
-Four gotchas at the top of `SKILL.md` shape the whole run, and each exists because of a specific failure: the output path is never inferred (a guessed destination scatters a directory's worth of files through someone's source tree); nothing is written outside that path; no empty topic file is ever written (a stub `troubleshooting.md` reads downstream as researched and closed); and a Context7 "no results", redirect or header-only response does not count as coverage. If no topic area has content, the run writes nothing at all — `sources.md` included — and reports what it searched.
-
-The frontmatter pins `model: sonnet` and a closed `allowed-tools` list. Notably it grants no subagent tool, so every `WebFetch` is serial and each fetched page lands in the run's own context — which is why steps 4 and 5 insist on reducing each page to notes before fetching the next, and cap deepening at roughly ten extra pages.
-
-## Composition
-
-Both reference files are read on condition, never on every run — `SKILL.md` inlines the minimum each step needs (the seven default topic areas at step 1, the four `sources.md` field names and the topic-file frontmatter keys at step 6) and sends the run to the reference only for what it does not carry. Those four field names are matched literally by the downstream provenance validator, so prose written in their place parses as nothing and the check passes having verified nothing — which is why they are inlined rather than deferred.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/research
-```
-
-Name the topic and the output path — the skill will stop and ask if the path is missing. Supplying starting URLs is treated as a deliberate source choice and skips Context7 resolution and discovery. For documentation derived from existing code or specs, use `write-docs`; for a bug or incident, use `diagnose`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The four gotchas and the six research steps |
-| `references/topics.md` | Read at Step 1 only when what belongs in a default topic is unclear or a custom topic is needed: the per-topic coverage table and the custom-topic naming rule |
-| `references/file-format.md` | Read at Step 6 only when the inlined field names do not settle the case: slug derivation, the Context7 slug and URL convention, and what belongs in a topic body |

plugins/bin/skills/research/SKILL.md

@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
----
-name: research
-description: >-
-  Use when the user wants a tool, library, or API researched from canonical
-  documentation into structured per-topic reference markdown files. Not
-  documentation written from existing code or specs -> `write-docs`. Not a bug
-  or incident -> `diagnose`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
-  category: research
-allowed-tools:
-  - Grep
-  - Glob
-  - Read
-  - Write
-  - WebSearch
-  - WebFetch
-  - mcp__context7__resolve-library-id
-  - mcp__context7__query-docs
-model: sonnet
----
-
-## Gotchas
-
-- Never infer the output path. A run writes a directory's worth of files, and a guessed destination scatters them through someone's source tree. If the user named no path, stop and ask.
-- Write nothing outside the given output path. A file placed beside the agreed directory is one the user never asked for and will not think to look for.
-- Never write an empty topic file. A stub `troubleshooting.md` reads downstream as researched and closed.
-- A Context7 response that is a "no results" message, a redirect notice, or header-only boilerplate is not coverage. A topic area counts as covered only when the response carries at least one substantive paragraph.
-
-## Step 1 — Scope against the working directory
-
-Search for existing use of the topic — imports, config files, version pins, reference files already written — and narrow the research to what is missing: the version actually in use, the topics not yet documented.
-
-The default topic areas are `overview`, `installation`, `configuration`, `cli-reference`,
-`api-reference`, `examples` and `troubleshooting` — one file each, and only where content exists.
-If what belongs in one of them is unclear, or the topic needs a file outside that set, read
-`references/topics.md` for the per-topic coverage table and the custom-topic naming rule.
-
-## Step 2 — Resolve against Context7
-
-If the topic is a library, framework, or API and the user gave no starting URLs, call `resolve-library-id` with the topic name and the user's full question — match quality depends on the question, not the bare name — then `query-docs` once per default topic area. Record each response as a source with slug `context7-<library-slug>`, and mark which topic areas it covered — those skip the web reads at step 4.
-
-If the library does not resolve, or the user gave starting URLs, go to step 3. Explicit URLs are a source choice; do not second-guess them with a resolution attempt.
-
-## Step 3 — Discover sources
-
-If the user gave starting URLs, skip discovery: those URLs are the source list and go straight to step 4.
-
-Otherwise, for every topic area Context7 did not cover, websearch for canonical documentation — `llms.txt`, official developer docs, and API references ahead of tutorials or blog posts. Collect three to five candidate URLs before reading any of them.
-
-If nothing usable comes back, stop and report what was searched, then ask for starting URLs rather than settling for tutorials.
-
-## Step 4 — Read the sources
-
-`WebFetch` each URL in turn. No subagent tool is granted here, so the reads are serial and every fetched page lands in this context: reduce each page to notes by topic area, plus the links worth deepening, before fetching the next one.
-
-## Step 5 — Deepen
-
-`WebFetch` the links worth following, still one at a time and still reducing each page to notes. Stop a branch once its content turns repetitive or leaves the topic, and cap the whole step at roughly ten additional pages — serial reads make that cap a real budget, not a formality.
-
-## Step 6 — Write
-
-Merge every set of notes, Context7 and web alike, by topic area, then write, in the output path:
-
-- `<topic>.md` for each topic area that has content, default or custom. Frontmatter carries `topic:` (the filename without `.md`) and `source_keys:` (kebab-case slugs matching `sources.md`); the body is prose in `##` sections, with no inline URLs.
-- `sources.md`, always, one `##` section per source — including sources that yielded nothing — with exactly these four fields:
-
-  ```markdown
-  - **URL:** <full URL>
-  - **Description:** <one-line summary>
-  - **Contributing files:** <topic files this source contributed to>
-  - **Status:** `extracted` | `no content extracted`
-  ```
-
-Spell those four field names exactly as given. The downstream provenance validator matches them literally; prose in their place parses as nothing, and the check passes having verified nothing.
-
-Read `references/file-format.md` when the four fields above do not settle the case: what a slug should be, the `context7-<library-slug>` slug and `context7:<library-id>` URL convention for a Context7 source, or what belongs in a topic body versus a verbatim copy of the source.
-
-If no topic area has content, write nothing at all, `sources.md` included, and report what was searched.

plugins/bin/skills/research/references/file-format.md

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-# Reference file format
-
-Every topic file follows this structure.
-
-## Frontmatter
-
-```yaml
----
-topic: <topic-slug>          # matches the filename without .md (e.g. "api-reference")
-source_keys:                 # kebab-case slugs of sources that contributed; must match sources.md entries
-  - <slug>
-  - <slug>
----
-```
-
-## Body
-
-Plain prose organized into markdown sections (`##`, `###`). Extract the content most relevant to skill authoring or implementation — not a verbatim copy of the source. Focus on:
-- Decisions that affect how to call the API or tool
-- Options, flags, or parameters with non-obvious behavior
-- Constraints, rate limits, or gotchas
-- Canonical patterns the skill should follow
-
-No inline URLs in the body — all source traceability lives in `sources.md` via `source_keys`.
-
-## sources.md format
-
-```markdown
-# Sources
-
-## <slug>
-
-- **URL:** <full URL>
-- **Description:** <one-line summary of what this source covers>
-- **Contributing files:** <comma-separated list of topic files this source contributed to>
-- **Status:** `extracted` | `no content extracted`
-```
-
-Use one `##` section per source. Slugs are kebab-case derived from the domain or page title (e.g. `stripe-api-docs`, `openai-python-sdk-readme`). For Context7 sources, use the slug `context7-<library-slug>` (e.g. `context7-vercel-next-js`) and set **URL** to `context7:<library-id>` (e.g. `context7:/vercel/next.js`).

plugins/bin/skills/research/references/topics.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-# Default topic list
-
-Create one file per topic when relevant content is found. Skip topics with no content. Add custom topics when content warrants it.
-
-| File | Covers |
-|---|---|
-| `overview.md` | What it is, key concepts, mental model, architecture summary |
-| `installation.md` | Setup, dependencies, prerequisites, version requirements |
-| `configuration.md` | Config files, options, environment variables, defaults |
-| `cli-reference.md` | Commands, subcommands, flags, exit codes |
-| `api-reference.md` | Endpoints, SDK methods, types, request/response shapes |
-| `examples.md` | Common usage patterns, recipes, quickstart walkthroughs |
-| `troubleshooting.md` | Known issues, error codes, gotchas, workarounds |
-
-## Custom topics
-
-Create additional topic files when content doesn't fit the defaults. Examples: `webhooks.md`, `rate-limits.md`, `authentication.md`, `migrations.md`, `security.md`. Use kebab-case filenames.

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/README.md

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
-# tdd
-
-Test-driven development as a strict red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time.
-
-## What it does
-
-Two convictions drive this skill. The first is about what a test is for: tests verify behaviour through public interfaces, not implementation details. A good test reads like a specification ("user can checkout with valid cart") and survives refactors because it does not care about internal structure. The warning sign for a bad one is precise — the test breaks when you refactor but behaviour has not changed.
-
-The second is an explicit anti-pattern: **do not write all the tests first, then all the implementation.** Horizontal slicing treats RED as "write every test" and GREEN as "write every implementation", and it produces tests of *imagined* behaviour — tests of the shape of things, insensitive to real change, committed to before the implementation was understood. The correct shape is vertical: one test → one implementation → repeat, each cycle informed by what the last one taught you.
-
-The workflow is four stages: plan (confirm the interface and which behaviours matter, with the user — you cannot test everything), fire a tracer bullet (one test proving the path works end to end), loop incrementally one behaviour at a time, then refactor once everything is green. Refactoring while RED is forbidden.
-
-Codebase exploration uses the project's domain glossary, so test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and ADRs in the area are respected.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/tdd
-```
-
-Describe the feature or bug. Expect the skill to ask what the public interface should look like and which behaviours matter most before any code is written. For diagnosing an existing bug rather than building test-first, use `diagnose`; for throwaway exploratory code, use `prototype`.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Philosophy, the horizontal-slicing anti-pattern, the four-stage workflow, and the per-cycle checklist |
-| `references/tests.md` | Cited from Philosophy: worked good and bad test examples |
-| `references/mocking.md` | Cited from Philosophy: mock at system boundaries only, and what not to mock |
-| `references/deep-modules.md` | Cited from stage 1: what a deep module is (small interface, large implementation) and why it is the design to aim for |
-| `references/interface-design.md` | Cited from stage 1: designing interfaces for testability, starting with accepting dependencies rather than creating them |
-| `references/refactoring.md` | Cited from stage 4: the refactor-candidate checklist — duplication, long methods, shallow modules, feature envy, primitive obsession |

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/SKILL.md

@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
----
-name: tdd
-description: >
-  Use when the user wants a feature built or a bug fixed test-first, in a strict
-  red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time. Not diagnosing an existing
-  bug -> `diagnose`. Not throwaway exploratory code -> `prototype`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-# Test-Driven Development
-
-## Philosophy
-
-**Core principle**: Tests should verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details. Code can change entirely; tests shouldn't.
-
-**Good tests** are integration-style: they exercise real code paths through public APIs. They describe _what_ the system does, not _how_ it does it. A good test reads like a specification - "user can checkout with valid cart" tells you exactly what capability exists. These tests survive refactors because they don't care about internal structure.
-
-**Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.
-
-If you need worked examples of the difference — a behaviour-level test beside the implementation-coupled version of the same check — read `references/tests.md`. If a test needs a collaborator faked, read `references/mocking.md` before reaching for a mock.
-
-## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices
-
-**DO NOT write all tests first, then all implementation.** This is "horizontal slicing" - treating RED as "write all tests" and GREEN as "write all code."
-
-This produces **crap tests**:
-
-- Tests written in bulk test _imagined_ behavior, not _actual_ behavior
-- You end up testing the _shape_ of things (data structures, function signatures) rather than user-facing behavior
-- Tests become insensitive to real changes - they pass when behavior breaks, fail when behavior is fine
-- You outrun your headlights, committing to test structure before understanding the implementation
-
-**Correct approach**: Vertical slices via tracer bullets. One test → one implementation → repeat. Each test responds to what you learned from the previous cycle. Because you just wrote the code, you know exactly what behavior matters and how to verify it.
-
-```
-WRONG (horizontal):
-  RED:   test1, test2, test3, test4, test5
-  GREEN: impl1, impl2, impl3, impl4, impl5
-
-RIGHT (vertical):
-  RED→GREEN: test1→impl1
-  RED→GREEN: test2→impl2
-  RED→GREEN: test3→impl3
-  ...
-```
-
-## Workflow
-
-### 1. Planning
-
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
-
-Before writing any code:
-
-- [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed
-- [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)
-- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](references/deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
-- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](references/interface-design.md)
-- [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)
-- [ ] Get user approval on the plan
-
-Ask: "What should the public interface look like? Which behaviors are most important to test?"
-
-**You can't test everything.** Confirm with the user exactly which behaviors matter most. Focus testing effort on critical paths and complex logic, not every possible edge case.
-
-### 2. Tracer Bullet
-
-Write ONE test that confirms ONE thing about the system:
-
-```
-RED:   Write test for first behavior → test fails
-GREEN: Write minimal code to pass → test passes
-```
-
-This is your tracer bullet - proves the path works end-to-end.
-
-### 3. Incremental Loop
-
-For each remaining behavior:
-
-```
-RED:   Write next test → fails
-GREEN: Minimal code to pass → passes
-```
-
-Rules:
-
-- One test at a time
-- Only enough code to pass current test
-- Don't anticipate future tests
-- Keep tests focused on observable behavior
-
-### 4. Refactor
-
-After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](references/refactoring.md):
-
-- [ ] Extract duplication
-- [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)
-- [ ] Apply SOLID principles where natural
-- [ ] Consider what new code reveals about existing code
-- [ ] Run tests after each refactor step
-
-**Never refactor while RED.** Get to GREEN first.
-
-## Checklist Per Cycle
-
-```
-[ ] Test describes behavior, not implementation
-[ ] Test uses public interface only
-[ ] Test would survive internal refactor
-[ ] Code is minimal for this test
-[ ] No speculative features added
-```

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/references/deep-modules.md

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-# Deep Modules
-
-From "A Philosophy of Software Design":
-
-**Deep module** = small interface + lots of implementation
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────┐
-│   Small Interface   │  ← Few methods, simple params
-├─────────────────────┤
-│                     │
-│                     │
-│  Deep Implementation│  ← Complex logic hidden
-│                     │
-│                     │
-└─────────────────────┘
-```
-
-**Shallow module** = large interface + little implementation (avoid)
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────┐
-│       Large Interface           │  ← Many methods, complex params
-├─────────────────────────────────┤
-│  Thin Implementation            │  ← Just passes through
-└─────────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
-When designing interfaces, ask:
-
-- Can I reduce the number of methods?
-- Can I simplify the parameters?
-- Can I hide more complexity inside?

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/references/interface-design.md

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-# Interface Design for Testability
-
-Good interfaces make testing natural:
-
-1. **Accept dependencies, don't create them**
-
-   ```typescript
-   // Testable
-   function processOrder(order, paymentGateway) {}
-
-   // Hard to test
-   function processOrder(order) {
-     const gateway = new StripeGateway();
-   }
-   ```
-
-2. **Return results, don't produce side effects**
-
-   ```typescript
-   // Testable
-   function calculateDiscount(cart): Discount {}
-
-   // Hard to test
-   function applyDiscount(cart): void {
-     cart.total -= discount;
-   }
-   ```
-
-3. **Small surface area**
-   - Fewer methods = fewer tests needed
-   - Fewer params = simpler test setup

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/references/mocking.md

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-# When to Mock
-
-Mock at **system boundaries** only:
-
-- External APIs (payment, email, etc.)
-- Databases (sometimes - prefer test DB)
-- Time/randomness
-- File system (sometimes)
-
-Don't mock:
-
-- Your own classes/modules
-- Internal collaborators
-- Anything you control
-
-## Designing for Mockability
-
-At system boundaries, design interfaces that are easy to mock:
-
-**1. Use dependency injection**
-
-Pass external dependencies in rather than creating them internally:
-
-```typescript
-// Easy to mock
-function processPayment(order, paymentClient) {
-  return paymentClient.charge(order.total);
-}
-
-// Hard to mock
-function processPayment(order) {
-  const client = new StripeClient(process.env.STRIPE_KEY);
-  return client.charge(order.total);
-}
-```
-
-**2. Prefer SDK-style interfaces over generic fetchers**
-
-Create specific functions for each external operation instead of one generic function with conditional logic:
-
-```typescript
-// GOOD: Each function is independently mockable
-const api = {
-  getUser: (id) => fetch(`/users/${id}`),
-  getOrders: (userId) => fetch(`/users/${userId}/orders`),
-  createOrder: (data) => fetch('/orders', { method: 'POST', body: data }),
-};
-
-// BAD: Mocking requires conditional logic inside the mock
-const api = {
-  fetch: (endpoint, options) => fetch(endpoint, options),
-};
-```
-
-The SDK approach means:
-- Each mock returns one specific shape
-- No conditional logic in test setup
-- Easier to see which endpoints a test exercises
-- Type safety per endpoint

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/references/refactoring.md

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-# Refactor Candidates
-
-After TDD cycle, look for:
-
-- **Duplication** → Extract function/class
-- **Long methods** → Break into private helpers (keep tests on public interface)
-- **Shallow modules** → Combine or deepen
-- **Feature envy** → Move logic to where data lives
-- **Primitive obsession** → Introduce value objects
-- **Existing code** the new code reveals as problematic

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/references/tests.md

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-# Good and Bad Tests
-
-## Good Tests
-
-**Integration-style**: Test through real interfaces, not mocks of internal parts.
-
-```typescript
-// GOOD: Tests observable behavior
-test("user can checkout with valid cart", async () => {
-  const cart = createCart();
-  cart.add(product);
-  const result = await checkout(cart, paymentMethod);
-  expect(result.status).toBe("confirmed");
-});
-```
-
-Characteristics:
-
-- Tests behavior users/callers care about
-- Uses public API only
-- Survives internal refactors
-- Describes WHAT, not HOW
-- One logical assertion per test
-
-## Bad Tests
-
-**Implementation-detail tests**: Coupled to internal structure.
-
-```typescript
-// BAD: Tests implementation details
-test("checkout calls paymentService.process", async () => {
-  const mockPayment = jest.mock(paymentService);
-  await checkout(cart, payment);
-  expect(mockPayment.process).toHaveBeenCalledWith(cart.total);
-});
-```
-
-Red flags:
-
-- Mocking internal collaborators
-- Testing private methods
-- Asserting on call counts/order
-- Test breaks when refactoring without behavior change
-- Test name describes HOW not WHAT
-- Verifying through external means instead of interface
-
-```typescript
-// BAD: Bypasses interface to verify
-test("createUser saves to database", async () => {
-  await createUser({ name: "Alice" });
-  const row = await db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = ?", ["Alice"]);
-  expect(row).toBeDefined();
-});
-
-// GOOD: Verifies through interface
-test("createUser makes user retrievable", async () => {
-  const user = await createUser({ name: "Alice" });
-  const retrieved = await getUser(user.id);
-  expect(retrieved.name).toBe("Alice");
-});
-```

plugins/bin/skills/triage/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# triage
-
-Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.
-
-## What it does
-
-Gives issue triage an explicit state model and a fixed set of moves. Every issue carries exactly one **category** role (`bug`, `enhancement`) and one **state** role (`needs-triage`, `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, `wontfix`); conflicting state roles are flagged to the maintainer before anything else happens. Unlabeled issues normally enter at `needs-triage`; `needs-info` returns there once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any point, and unusual transitions are questioned rather than executed silently.
-
-A run does one of three things depending on what the maintainer asks for:
-
-- **Show what needs attention** — three buckets, oldest first: unlabeled, `needs-triage`, and `needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes.
-- **Triage a specific issue** — gather context (including prior triage notes, so resolved questions are not re-asked, and `.out-of-scope/` records that resemble the issue), recommend a category and state with reasoning, attempt reproduction for bugs *before* any grilling, run a `grill-with-docs` session if the issue needs fleshing out, then apply the outcome.
-- **Quick state override** — "move #42 to ready-for-agent" is trusted and applied directly, skipping grilling, after confirming the exact changes.
-
-Two hard rules: every comment or issue the skill posts during triage must open with the AI-generated disclaimer, and the canonical role names above are *not* necessarily the label strings in the tracker — each is resolved against the tracker's live label set before it is applied, and a name with no counterpart there is reported to the maintainer as a gap rather than guessed at.
-
-## Composition
-
-`grill-with-docs` is invoked at step 4 when an issue needs fleshing out; whatever that session establishes is carried into the triage notes so the work is not lost. The reverse direction also exists: `diagnose` names this skill as the place to send a *reported* bug that needs filing rather than debugging.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/triage
-```
-
-Then describe what you want in natural language — "show me anything that needs my attention", "let's look at #42", "move #42 to ready-for-agent", "what's ready for agents to pick up?".
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The roles and state machine, the three invocation modes, the needs-info template, and how to resume a prior session |
-| `references/agent-brief.md` | Cited when an issue moves to `ready-for-agent` (and reused for `ready-for-human`): how to write a brief that stays durable for weeks while the codebase moves under it — describe interfaces and behavioural contracts, not line numbers |
-| `references/out-of-scope.md` | Cited when an enhancement is closed `wontfix` and when checking for prior rejections: how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base is laid out and what it is for — institutional memory, and deduplication against re-litigated requests |

plugins/bin/skills/triage/SKILL.md

@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
----
-name: triage
-description: >
-  Use when the user wants an issue created, triaged, or moved through the
-  tracker's triage states, or an issue prepared for an AFK agent. Not debugging
-  the bug itself -> `diagnose`. Not fleshing out a design -> `grill-with-docs`.
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-# Triage
-
-Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.
-
-Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start with this disclaimer:
-
-```
-> *This was generated by AI during triage.*
-```
-
-## Reference docs
-
-- [agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
-- [out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
-
-## Roles
-
-Two **category** roles:
-
-- `bug` — something is broken
-- `enhancement` — new feature or improvement
-
-Five **state** roles:
-
-- `needs-triage` — maintainer needs to evaluate
-- `needs-info` — waiting on reporter for more information
-- `ready-for-agent` — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent
-- `ready-for-human` — needs human implementation
-- `wontfix` — will not be actioned
-
-Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.
-
-These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. Resolve each canonical name against the tracker's live label set before applying it, using whichever tracker skill this install provides. If a name has no counterpart there, report the gap and ask the maintainer for the mapping — never substitute a guess.
-
-State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.
-
-## Invocation
-
-The maintainer invokes `/triage` and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:
-
-- "Show me anything that needs my attention"
-- "Let's look at #42"
-- "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
-- "What's ready for agents to pick up?"
-
-## Show what needs attention
-
-Query the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:
-
-1. **Unlabeled** — never triaged.
-2. **`needs-triage`** — evaluation in progress.
-3. **`needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes** — needs re-evaluation.
-
-Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
-
-## Triage a specific issue
-
-1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
-
-2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.
-
-3. **Reproduce (bugs only).** Before any grilling, attempt reproduction: read the reporter's steps, trace the relevant code, run tests or commands. Report what happened — successful repro with code path, failed repro, or insufficient detail (a strong `needs-info` signal). A confirmed repro makes a much stronger agent brief.
-
-4. **Grill (if needed).** If the issue needs fleshing out, run a `/grill-with-docs` session.
-
-5. **Apply the outcome:**
-   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md)).
-   - `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
-   - `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
-   - `wontfix` (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
-   - `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md)).
-   - `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
-
-## Quick state override
-
-If the maintainer says "move #42 to ready-for-agent", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to `ready-for-agent` without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.
-
-## Needs-info template
-
-```markdown
-## Triage Notes
-
-**What we've established so far:**
-
-- point 1
-- point 2
-
-**What we still need from you (@reporter):**
-
-- question 1
-- question 2
-```
-
-Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".
-
-## Resuming a previous session
-
-If prior triage notes exist on the issue, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.

plugins/bin/skills/triage/references/agent-brief.md

@@ -1,168 +0,0 @@
-# Writing Agent Briefs
-
-An agent brief is a structured comment posted on an issue in the issue tracker when it moves to `ready-for-agent`. It is the authoritative specification that an AFK agent will work from. The original issue body and discussion are context — the agent brief is the contract.
-
-## Principles
-
-### Durability over precision
-
-The issue may sit in `ready-for-agent` for days or weeks. The codebase will change in the meantime. Write the brief so it stays useful even as files are renamed, moved, or refactored.
-
-- **Do** describe interfaces, types, and behavioral contracts
-- **Do** name specific types, function signatures, or config shapes that the agent should look for or modify
-- **Don't** reference file paths — they go stale
-- **Don't** reference line numbers
-- **Don't** assume the current implementation structure will remain the same
-
-### Behavioral, not procedural
-
-Describe **what** the system should do, not **how** to implement it. The agent will explore the codebase fresh and make its own implementation decisions.
-
-- **Good:** "The `SkillConfig` type should accept an optional `schedule` field of type `CronExpression`"
-- **Bad:** "Open src/types/skill.ts and add a schedule field on line 42"
-- **Good:** "When a user runs `/triage` with no arguments, they should see a summary of issues needing attention"
-- **Bad:** "Add a switch statement in the main handler function"
-
-### Complete acceptance criteria
-
-The agent needs to know when it's done. Every agent brief must have concrete, testable acceptance criteria. Each criterion should be independently verifiable.
-
-- **Good:** "Querying the issue tracker for the `needs-triage` label returns issues that have been through initial classification"
-- **Bad:** "Triage should work correctly"
-
-### Explicit scope boundaries
-
-State what is out of scope. This prevents the agent from gold-plating or making assumptions about adjacent features.
-
-## Template
-
-```markdown
-## Agent Brief
-
-**Category:** bug / enhancement
-**Summary:** one-line description of what needs to happen
-
-**Current behavior:**
-Describe what happens now. For bugs, this is the broken behavior.
-For enhancements, this is the status quo the feature builds on.
-
-**Desired behavior:**
-Describe what should happen after the agent's work is complete.
-Be specific about edge cases and error conditions.
-
-**Key interfaces:**
-- `TypeName` — what needs to change and why
-- `functionName()` return type — what it currently returns vs what it should return
-- Config shape — any new configuration options needed
-
-**Acceptance criteria:**
-- [ ] Specific, testable criterion 1
-- [ ] Specific, testable criterion 2
-- [ ] Specific, testable criterion 3
-
-**Out of scope:**
-- Thing that should NOT be changed or addressed in this issue
-- Adjacent feature that might seem related but is separate
-```
-
-## Examples
-
-### Good agent brief (bug)
-
-```markdown
-## Agent Brief
-
-**Category:** bug
-**Summary:** Skill description truncation drops mid-word, producing broken output
-
-**Current behavior:**
-When a skill description exceeds 1024 characters, it is truncated at exactly
-1024 characters regardless of word boundaries. This produces descriptions
-that end mid-word (e.g. "Use when the user wants to confi").
-
-**Desired behavior:**
-Truncation should break at the last word boundary before 1024 characters
-and append "..." to indicate truncation.
-
-**Key interfaces:**
-- The `SkillMetadata` type's `description` field — no type change needed,
-  but the validation/processing logic that populates it needs to respect
-  word boundaries
-- Any function that reads SKILL.md frontmatter and extracts the description
-
-**Acceptance criteria:**
-- [ ] Descriptions under 1024 chars are unchanged
-- [ ] Descriptions over 1024 chars are truncated at the last word boundary
-      before 1024 chars
-- [ ] Truncated descriptions end with "..."
-- [ ] The total length including "..." does not exceed 1024 chars
-
-**Out of scope:**
-- Changing the 1024 char limit itself
-- Multi-line description support
-```
-
-### Good agent brief (enhancement)
-
-```markdown
-## Agent Brief
-
-**Category:** enhancement
-**Summary:** Add `.out-of-scope/` directory support for tracking rejected feature requests
-
-**Current behavior:**
-When a feature request is rejected, the issue is closed with a `wontfix` label
-and a comment. There is no persistent record of the decision or reasoning.
-Future similar requests require the maintainer to recall or search for the
-prior discussion.
-
-**Desired behavior:**
-Rejected feature requests should be documented in `.out-of-scope/<concept>.md`
-files that capture the decision, reasoning, and links to all issues that
-requested the feature. When triaging new issues, these files should be
-checked for matches.
-
-**Key interfaces:**
-- Markdown file format in `.out-of-scope/` — each file should have a
-  `# Concept Name` heading, a `**Decision:**` line, a `**Reason:**` line,
-  and a `**Prior requests:**` list with issue links
-- The triage workflow should read all `.out-of-scope/*.md` files early
-  and match incoming issues against them by concept similarity
-
-**Acceptance criteria:**
-- [ ] Closing a feature as wontfix creates/updates a file in `.out-of-scope/`
-- [ ] The file includes the decision, reasoning, and link to the closed issue
-- [ ] If a matching `.out-of-scope/` file already exists, the new issue is
-      appended to its "Prior requests" list rather than creating a duplicate
-- [ ] During triage, existing `.out-of-scope/` files are checked and surfaced
-      when a new issue matches a prior rejection
-
-**Out of scope:**
-- Automated matching (human confirms the match)
-- Reopening previously rejected features
-- Bug reports (only enhancement rejections go to `.out-of-scope/`)
-```
-
-### Bad agent brief
-
-```markdown
-## Agent Brief
-
-**Summary:** Fix the triage bug
-
-**What to do:**
-The triage thing is broken. Look at the main file and fix it.
-The function around line 150 has the issue.
-
-**Files to change:**
-- src/triage/handler.ts (line 150)
-- src/types.ts (line 42)
-```
-
-This is bad because:
-- No category
-- Vague description ("the triage thing is broken")
-- References file paths and line numbers that will go stale
-- No acceptance criteria
-- No scope boundaries
-- No description of current vs desired behavior

plugins/bin/skills/triage/references/out-of-scope.md

@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
-# Out-of-Scope Knowledge Base
-
-The `.out-of-scope/` directory in a repo stores persistent records of rejected feature requests. It serves two purposes:
-
-1. **Institutional memory** — why a feature was rejected, so the reasoning isn't lost when the issue is closed
-2. **Deduplication** — when a new issue comes in that matches a prior rejection, the skill can surface the previous decision instead of re-litigating it
-
-## Directory structure
-
-```
-.out-of-scope/
-├── dark-mode.md
-├── plugin-system.md
-└── graphql-api.md
-```
-
-One file per **concept**, not per issue. Multiple issues requesting the same thing are grouped under one file.
-
-## File format
-
-The file should be written in a relaxed, readable style — more like a short design document than a database entry. Use paragraphs, code samples, and examples to make the reasoning clear and useful to someone encountering it for the first time.
-
-```markdown
-# Dark Mode
-
-This project does not support dark mode or user-facing theming.
-
-## Why this is out of scope
-
-The rendering pipeline assumes a single color palette defined in
-`ThemeConfig`. Supporting multiple themes would require:
-
-- A theme context provider wrapping the entire component tree
-- Per-component theme-aware style resolution
-- A persistence layer for user theme preferences
-
-This is a significant architectural change that doesn't align with the
-project's focus on content authoring. Theming is a concern for downstream
-consumers who embed or redistribute the output.
-
-```ts
-// The current ThemeConfig interface is not designed for runtime switching:
-interface ThemeConfig {
-  colors: ColorPalette; // single palette, resolved at build time
-  fonts: FontStack;
-}
-```
-
-## Prior requests
-
-- #42 — "Add dark mode support"
-- #87 — "Night theme for accessibility"
-- #134 — "Dark theme option"
-```
-
-### Naming the file
-
-Use a short, descriptive kebab-case name for the concept: `dark-mode.md`, `plugin-system.md`, `graphql-api.md`. The name should be recognizable enough that someone browsing the directory understands what was rejected without opening the file.
-
-### Writing the reason
-
-The reason should be substantive — not "we don't want this" but why. Good reasons reference:
-
-- Project scope or philosophy ("This project focuses on X; theming is a downstream concern")
-- Technical constraints ("Supporting this would require Y, which conflicts with our Z architecture")
-- Strategic decisions ("We chose to use A instead of B because...")
-
-The reason should be durable. Avoid referencing temporary circumstances ("we're too busy right now") — those aren't real rejections, they're deferrals.
-
-## When to check `.out-of-scope/`
-
-During triage (Step 1: Gather context), read all files in `.out-of-scope/`. When evaluating a new issue:
-
-- Check if the request matches an existing out-of-scope concept
-- Matching is by concept similarity, not keyword — "night theme" matches `dark-mode.md`
-- If there's a match, surface it to the maintainer: "This is similar to `.out-of-scope/dark-mode.md` — we rejected this before because [reason]. Do you still feel the same way?"
-
-The maintainer may:
-
-- **Confirm** — the new issue gets added to the existing file's "Prior requests" list, then closed
-- **Reconsider** — the out-of-scope file gets deleted or updated, and the issue proceeds through normal triage
-- **Disagree** — the issues are related but distinct, proceed with normal triage
-
-## When to write to `.out-of-scope/`
-
-Only when an **enhancement** (not a bug) is rejected as `wontfix`. The flow:
-
-1. Maintainer decides a feature request is out of scope
-2. Check if a matching `.out-of-scope/` file already exists
-3. If yes: append the new issue to the "Prior requests" list
-4. If no: create a new file with the concept name, decision, reason, and first prior request
-5. Post a comment on the issue explaining the decision and mentioning the `.out-of-scope/` file
-6. Close the issue with the `wontfix` label
-
-## Updating or removing out-of-scope files
-
-If the maintainer changes their mind about a previously rejected concept:
-
-- Delete the `.out-of-scope/` file
-- The skill does not need to reopen old issues — they're historical records
-- The new issue that triggered the reconsideration proceeds through normal triage

plugins/bin/skills/write-docs/README.md

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# write-docs
-
-Produce technical documentation derived from code and spec, one section at a time, with a confirmation gate on every section.
-
-## What it does
-
-Casts the agent as a technical writer with one non-negotiable constraint: **every claim must be traceable to a source file line, a spec section, or an explicit user statement.** Nothing is invented, and behaviour that genuinely cannot be documented from the available sources is marked out-of-scope rather than explained away.
-
-The process is eight steps — identify scope, read and extract, gap check, draft section by section, confirmation gate, delta summary, reader testing, finalise — and several of them are deliberately gated on the human:
-
-- Files are read only after the user approves them by name. The skill may propose candidates; it waits.
-- The **gap check** presents what the code does say and asks the user to fill only what it does not: caller intent, error-handling rationale, non-obvious side effects.
-- No section is finalised until the full revised text has been shown. The skill never gates on output the user has not seen, and never reprints the whole document — all edits are surgical.
-- **Reader testing** predicts 5–10 questions a target reader would ask, then spawns a sub-agent that receives only the finished doc and the questions — no source files. If the doc cannot answer them, neither can the sub-agent, and the run loops back to drafting.
-
-Summary and overview sections are written last, once the detail sections are stable.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/write-docs
-```
-
-Name the files or modules to document, the target audience (developer / user / contributor / internal), and the documentation type (reference, guide, README section, inline comment, changelog entry). For a PRD, ADR or decision doc, use `grill-me` or `grill-with-docs` instead — those have dedicated handling.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — role, use/do-not-use boundaries, required inputs, constraints, the eight-step process, output format, failure handling, and a nine-item self-check |

plugins/bin/skills/write-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
----
-name: write-docs
-description: >
-  Use when the user wants technical documentation produced or updated from code
-  or spec, every claim traced to a source — "write docs for X", "document this
-  module", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this". Not an ADR
-  or other decision record -> `grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched
-  from its docs -> `research`.
-updated: 2026-05-17
-when: invoked by explicit trigger ("write docs for X", "document this module", "create docs for this feature") or implicit request to produce technical documentation from code or spec
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
-  category: implement
-source:
-  - repo: anthropics/skills
-    commit: f458cee31a7577a47ba0c9a101976fa599385174
-    files:
-      - skills/doc-coauthoring/SKILL.md  # Reader Testing stage, surgical-edit constraint, gap-check step
-    updated: 2026-05-17
-  - repo: mattpocock/skills
-    commit: e74f0061bb67222181640effa98c675bdb2fdaa7
-    files:
-      - skills/productivity/write-a-skill/SKILL.md  # trigger pattern, review checklist items
-    updated: 2026-05-17
-  - repo: bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD
-    commit: 71136bc6af77cbf507d3768494311d5b6ca95cc5
-    files:
-      - src/core-skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/SKILL.md  # confirmation gate before applying changes
-    updated: 2026-05-17
----
-
-## Role
-
-You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec — you derive every claim from a source file or explicit user input and never invent behaviour.
-
-## When to use / When not to use
-
-**Use when:**
-- User wants to document a module, class, function, feature, CLI flag, API endpoint, config file, or README section
-- User says "write docs for X", "document this", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this"
-
-**Do not use when:**
-- User wants an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-with-docs`, which writes ADRs
-- User wants a PRD → no skill in this set produces one; say so rather than redirecting
-- User wants to document a skill file (skill files are self-describing)
-- User wants marketing or blog copy
-- Documentation requires tacit organisational knowledge that cannot be read from code or spec
-
-## Required inputs
-
-- Specific file(s) or module(s) to document, or enough description to propose candidates
-- Target audience: developer / user / contributor / internal
-- Documentation type: reference, guide, README section, inline comment, changelog entry
-
-## Constraints
-
-- Every claim must be traceable to a source file line, spec section, or explicit user statement — never invent behaviour
-- User must approve specific files before the skill reads them; skill may propose candidates but waits for approval
-- Stage skipping is allowed only with an explicit user request and a one-sentence logged reason
-- Show the full revised section before each confirmation gate — never gate on output the user has not seen
-- Never reprint the whole document; all edits are surgical
-- Produce a one-line delta summary after each refinement round
-- Reader Testing sub-agent receives only the finished doc and the question list — no source files
-- Write summary and overview sections last, after all detail sections are stable
-
-## Process
-
-1. **Identify scope.** User names specific files or sections. If not provided, propose candidates based on the description — wait for explicit approval before reading.
-
-2. **Read and extract.** Read approved files. Extract: public API surface, described behaviour, visible constraints, non-obvious invariants. Note what the code does NOT explain (caller intent, error handling rationale, non-obvious side effects).
-
-3. **Gap check.** Present extracted behaviour to the user. Ask them to fill only the gaps — what the code does not explain. Log any explicitly deferred gaps. If the user requests to skip this step, log the reason and proceed.
-
-4. **Draft section by section.** For each section: state the proposed content and its source (code line / spec section / user input). Show; confirm before moving to the next section.
-
-5. **Confirmation gate.** Before finalising any section, show the full revised section. Wait for explicit confirmation or correction — never apply changes the user has not seen.
-
-6. **Delta summary.** After each round of revisions: "Round N: changed [sections], added [X], removed [Y]."
-
-7. **Reader Testing.** Predict 5–10 questions a target reader would ask. Spawn a scoped sub-agent that receives only the finished doc and the questions — no source files. Report its answers. If any answers fail, loop back to step 4.
-
-8. **Finalise.** Write summary and overview sections last. Prompt the user to review the complete document before committing.
-
-## Output format
-
-- Markdown artifact with section headers; produced one section at a time — never as a single large dump
-- Delta summary after each refinement round: "Round N: [what changed]"
-- Reader Testing report: numbered question list with sub-agent answers
-- Final doc at the user-specified or conventionally appropriate path
-
-## Failure handling
-
-- Files not named and description too vague to propose candidates → ask for specific names before reading
-- Stage skipped without a logged reason → flag and require the one-sentence log before continuing
-- Code behaviour is undocumentable (internal implementation detail, no public spec) → note as out-of-scope in the doc; do not invent an explanation
-- Reader Testing sub-agent fails on multiple questions → surface the failures, return to step 4; do not mark complete
-- Requested output is an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-with-docs`; for a PRD, say no skill here produces one instead of redirecting
-
-## Self-check
-
-- [ ] All claims traceable to a source file or explicit user input
-- [ ] No invented behaviour — unverifiable claims removed
-- [ ] User approved specific files before reading
-- [ ] Any stage skips logged with reason
-- [ ] Full revised section shown before each confirmation gate
-- [ ] Delta summary produced after each refinement round
-- [ ] Reader Testing completed with scoped sub-agent (doc + questions only)
-- [ ] Summary/overview written last
-- [ ] User prompted to review before committing

plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/README.md

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-# zoom-out
-
-Ask the agent to go up a layer of abstraction and map the modules and callers around unfamiliar code.
-
-## What it does
-
-A single-purpose prompt for the moment you land in a part of the codebase you do not know. Instead of answering at the level of the file in front of it, the agent climbs one layer and produces a map of the relevant modules and their callers — and names them using the project's own domain glossary vocabulary, so the map lines up with the language the rest of the repo already uses.
-
-## Hand-invoked only
-
-`SKILL.md` sets `disable-model-invocation: true`, so the router never selects this skill on its own and no other skill can hand off to it. It runs when the human asks for it. That also means its description is written as one plain human-facing sentence — it carries no trigger phrasing or boundary clause, because nothing routes on it.
-
-## Usage
-
-```text
-/zoom-out
-```
-
-Best used with the unfamiliar code already in context — the skill widens the view around what you are looking at rather than picking a starting point for you.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | The whole skill — a single instruction, no supporting files |

plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md

@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
----
-name: zoom-out
-description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
-disable-model-invocation: true
-metadata:
-  version: "1.0.0"
----
-
-I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/README.md

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# agentsmd-audit
-
-Audit a target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) for embedded secrets, structural completeness, and drift.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs a single combined pass across every AGENTS.md file in a repo (root and any nested monorepo files): flags embedded secrets/credentials, checks structure against the agents.md common-sections checklist, and resolves referenced commands/paths against the actual repo to catch stale documentation. Outputs a compact findings report — findings only, grouped by dimension, each with Why and Fix. Never inspects provider-specific adapter files (CLAUDE.md, etc.) and never writes or fixes anything.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/agentsmd-audit
-```
-
-Provide the path to the repo root to audit when invoking.
-
-Also invoke it proactively after `agentsmd-author` creates or updates an AGENTS.md, or after a
-hand-edit made outside `agentsmd-author` — the audit is what confirms the result is safe to commit.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` | Scans AGENTS.md files for embedded secrets, API keys, tokens, connection strings |
-| `scripts/validate-structure.sh` | Checks for empty/placeholder content, common-sections checklist, nested-vs-root duplication |
-| `scripts/validate-drift.sh` | Resolves referenced npm/make commands and file paths against the repo |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — sources that informed this skill and which files each contributed to |
-| `scripts/README.md` | Directory documentation for `scripts/` |
-| `tests/README.md` | (source-only) Bats test dependency and run instructions |
-| `tests/validate-secrets.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-structure.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-structure.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-drift.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-drift.sh` |
-
-Rows marked **(source-only)** exist in the authoring source (`.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/`) but are
-not present in an installed plugin: the repo's `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` strips
-`<category>/<name>/tests` when it generates the flat mirror, because these are dev-time fixtures no
-plugin host needs to discover (ADR-0017). Run them from a repo checkout, not from an install.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/agentsmd-author/README.md

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-# agentsmd-author
-
-Create or update a target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) by exploring the repo for real conventions.
-
-## What it does
-
-Explores a target repo (package manager scripts, Makefile/task runner, CI config, linter config, existing docs) and writes or updates `AGENTS.md` with only verified commands and conventions — never invented ones. Supports nested monorepo placement, following the agents.md standard's nearest-file-wins precedence. Closes every run by invoking `agentsmd-audit` inline, and hands off to `provider-adapter-author` when an existing provider-specific file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) now duplicates content AGENTS.md owns.
-
-## Before you start
-
-The `agentsmd-audit` skill must be available (co-installed in the `core` plugin) — this skill invokes it as a mandatory closeout step.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/agentsmd-author
-```
-
-Provide the target repo root (defaults to the current directory) and, if relevant, which subdirectory should get a nested AGENTS.md.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `references/content-guide.md` | Section-by-section AGENTS.md content guidance, a worked example, and monorepo/nested-file precedence rules |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — sources that informed this skill and which files each contributed to |

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/README.md

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-# provider-adapter-author
-
-Convert a target repo's provider-specific instruction file (CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules, copilot-instructions.md, etc.) into a thin adapter over AGENTS.md.
-
-## What it does
-
-Detects a provider-specific AI instruction file in a target repo, diffs it against the repo's `AGENTS.md`, and rewrites it down to a minimal reference — an `@AGENTS.md`-style import for providers that support one, or a text pointer for those that don't — plus only genuinely provider-specific additions. Self-validates its own output with a bundled deterministic script (no LLM judgment, no separate audit skill) before finishing.
-
-## Before you start
-
-The target repo must already have an `AGENTS.md`. If it doesn't, run `agentsmd-author` first — this skill never creates or edits `AGENTS.md` itself.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/provider-adapter-author
-```
-
-Provide the path to the provider-specific file to convert (and the target repo root, if not inferable). Can be invoked directly, or composed into by `agentsmd-author` when it detects an existing provider file with content overlapping AGENTS.md.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `references/provider-matrix.md` | Loaded at Step 1 before searching, unless the target is already a known root `CLAUDE.md`: known files per provider, which ones resolve a cross-file import, the validator flag each needs, and the rule that a standalone run and a run composed into by `agentsmd-author` behave identically |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — the in-repo ADR precedent this skill's design is modeled on |
-| `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` | Self-check gate: reference to AGENTS.md present, no excessive duplication, adapter stays thin |
-| `scripts/README.md` | Directory documentation for `scripts/` |
-| `tests/README.md` | (source-only) Bats test dependency and run instructions |
-| `tests/validate-adapter.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` |
-
-Rows marked **(source-only)** exist in the authoring source (`.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/`)
-but are not present in an installed plugin: the repo's `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` strips
-`<category>/<name>/tests` when it generates the flat mirror, because these are dev-time fixtures no
-plugin host needs to discover (ADR-0017). Run them from a repo checkout, not from an install.

plugins/core/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "core",
-  "version": "1.1.2",
-  "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
-  "author": {
-    "name": "Defame1297",
-    "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
-    "url": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/"
-  },
-  "license": "MIT",
-  "homepage": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/core",
-  "repository": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/core",
-  "keywords": [
-    "agents-md",
-    "documentation",
-    "audit",
-    "provider-adapter",
-    "governance"
-  ]
-}

plugins/core/.github/plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "name": "core",
-  "version": "1.1.2",
-  "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
-  "author": {
-    "name": "Defame1297",
-    "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
-    "url": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/"
-  },
-  "license": "MIT",
-  "homepage": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/core",
-  "repository": "https://git.dev.rkdr.net/Defame1297/holocron/src/branch/main/plugins/core",
-  "keywords": [
-    "agents-md",
-    "documentation",
-    "audit",
-    "provider-adapter",
-    "governance"
-  ]
-}

plugins/core/.mcp.json

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "mcpServers": {}
-}

plugins/core/README.md

@@ -4,37 +4,32 @@ Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter fi
 
 ## Install
 
-**Claude Code:**
+apm is the only supported install path (ADR-0024). Declare this package in the consuming project's `apm.yml`:
 
-```bash
-claude plugin marketplace add <owner>/<repo>
-claude plugin install core@<marketplace-name>
+```yaml
+dependencies:
+  apm:
+    - git: git@git.dev.rkdr.net:Defame1297/holocron.git
+      path: plugins/core
 ```
 
-**GitHub Copilot CLI:**
+Then:
 
 ```bash
-copilot plugin marketplace add <owner>/<repo>
-copilot plugin install core
+apm install
 ```
 
-**Local (development):**
+The entry above is unpinned and tracks the remote's default branch — add `ref: <tag>` to pin a release. Registering the catalogue instead (`apm marketplace add git@git.dev.rkdr.net:Defame1297/holocron.git --name holocron`) gets you the `core@holocron` short name, but writes to `~/.apm/marketplaces.json` at user scope; the git+path object needs nothing beyond the manifest.
 
-```bash
-# Claude Code
-claude --plugin-dir ./plugins/core
-
-# GitHub Copilot CLI
-copilot plugin install ./plugins/core
-```
+**Native plugin installs do not work.** This package ships no per-plugin manifest and no flat content directories, so a host that installs it natively gets zero skills — and Claude Code raises no error while doing it (ADR-0024).
 
 ## Contents
 
 | Component | Path | Description |
 |---|---|---|
-| Skills | `.apm/skills/` → `skills/` | Slash commands available after install |
+| Skills | `.apm/skills/` | Slash commands available after install |
 
-`.apm/` is the authoring source; `skills/` is the generated mirror plugin hosts scan (ADR-0017).
+`.apm/` is the authoring source and the only thing apm deploys (ADR-0024).
 
 ## Skills
 

plugins/core/skills/agentsmd-audit/README.md

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# agentsmd-audit
-
-Audit a target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) for embedded secrets, structural completeness, and drift.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs a single combined pass across every AGENTS.md file in a repo (root and any nested monorepo files): flags embedded secrets/credentials, checks structure against the agents.md common-sections checklist, and resolves referenced commands/paths against the actual repo to catch stale documentation. Outputs a compact findings report — findings only, grouped by dimension, each with Why and Fix. Never inspects provider-specific adapter files (CLAUDE.md, etc.) and never writes or fixes anything.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/agentsmd-audit
-```
-
-Provide the path to the repo root to audit when invoking.
-
-Also invoke it proactively after `agentsmd-author` creates or updates an AGENTS.md, or after a
-hand-edit made outside `agentsmd-author` — the audit is what confirms the result is safe to commit.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` | Scans AGENTS.md files for embedded secrets, API keys, tokens, connection strings |
-| `scripts/validate-structure.sh` | Checks for empty/placeholder content, common-sections checklist, nested-vs-root duplication |
-| `scripts/validate-drift.sh` | Resolves referenced npm/make commands and file paths against the repo |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — sources that informed this skill and which files each contributed to |
-| `scripts/README.md` | Directory documentation for `scripts/` |
-| `tests/README.md` | (source-only) Bats test dependency and run instructions |
-| `tests/validate-secrets.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-structure.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-structure.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-drift.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-drift.sh` |
-
-Rows marked **(source-only)** exist in the authoring source (`.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/`) but are
-not present in an installed plugin: the repo's `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` strips
-`<category>/<name>/tests` when it generates the flat mirror, because these are dev-time fixtures no
-plugin host needs to discover (ADR-0017). Run them from a repo checkout, not from an install.

plugins/core/skills/agentsmd-audit/SKILL.md

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
----
-name: agentsmd-audit
-description: >
-  Use when the user wants a repo's AGENTS.md audited for secrets, structure
-  and drift — "is this AGENTS.md safe to commit" — or after a hand-edit
-  outside `agentsmd-author`.
-  Not converting a provider file -> `provider-adapter-author`.
-  Not writing AGENTS.md -> `agentsmd-author`.
-allowed-tools: Bash Read
-metadata:
-  category: docs
-  source_keys:
-    - agents-md-official
-    - context7-websites-agents-md
-    - context7-agentsmd-agents-md
-    - governance-secrets-hard-prohibition
-  version: "0.1.2"
----
-
-## Gotchas
-
-- Always run all three checks — this skill does a single combined pass, not staged/gated passes. Don't skip structure or drift checks just because a secrets FAIL was found.
-- Never inspect or mention provider-specific adapter files (`CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`, etc.) — that's out of scope.
-- Gather findings internally; don't narrate PASS/FAIL per check as you go — surface them only in the final report.
-
-## Step 1 — Run the validators
-
-```bash
-bash scripts/validate-secrets.sh <repo-root>
-bash scripts/validate-structure.sh <repo-root>
-bash scripts/validate-drift.sh <repo-root>
-```
-
-Each script walks the repo for every `AGENTS.md` file (root and nested, excluding `.git`, `node_modules`, `vendor`, and similar) and prints `FAIL` lines, plus `INFO`/`SUGGESTION` where applicable, with `Why`/`Fix` (or `Note`) per finding. A nonzero exit means at least one FAIL was found in that dimension. If a script cannot execute (`python3` unavailable, Bash denied), fall back to manual review: scan for real-looking credentials, check common sections are present, and spot-check a few referenced commands/paths by hand. Grade a manual finding the way the scripts grade theirs: a missing common section (e.g. no "Security" heading) is informational, not a failure — not every repo needs every section from the checklist. Only flag a FAIL when the file is empty, entirely unfilled placeholder text, or contains a real embedded secret/stale reference.
-
-## Step 2 — Report
-
-Open with a coverage line:
-
-```text
-Checked: secrets · structure · drift
-```
-
-Then output only findings that were found, in this order within a repo: `### Secrets`, `### Structure`, `### Drift`. Omit a dimension heading entirely if it produced nothing — its absence confirms it passed. Report each finding verbatim as emitted by the scripts (they already carry file:line, Why/Fix or Note).
-
-Close with a `## Result` block holding one line: `PASS`, `PASS (N suggestions)`, or `FAIL (N fails · M suggestions)`, each optionally followed by ` · P info`. Omit the suggestion count when there are none, and omit `· P info` when there are none. INFO and SUGGESTION findings are observational — they never flip PASS to FAIL. Do not fix anything — this skill reports and proposes only. Point the user to `agentsmd-author` to apply fixes.