docs: fix two more stale commit hashes in simplification audit

Findings 13 and 21 cited b4c3d5e and 4bbd8a5, both dangling (not
reachable from HEAD) -- an amend after ace2d66 changed the hashes of
the underlying commits to 6cfc357 and f5e4d0d without updating the
self-reference. Corrected both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YR2CjVumUbEGWcMikcoXBD

.claude-plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "holocron",
   "description": "AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.",
-  "version": "0.4.2",
+  "version": "0.4.6",
   "owner": {
     "name": "Defame1297",
     "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
@@ -11,35 +11,35 @@
     {
       "name": "kyberforge",
       "description": "Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.",
-      "version": "1.6.0",
+      "version": "1.6.2",
       "category": "Developer Tools",
       "source": "./plugins/kyberforge"
     },
     {
       "name": "bin",
-      "description": "A place for things to be binned",
+      "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
-      "version": "1.1.3",
+      "version": "1.1.7",
       "category": "Utilities",
       "source": "./plugins/bin"
     },
     {
       "name": "git",
-      "description": "Skills for working with Git — conventional commits, branch management, pull requests, and feature flow.",
+      "description": "Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.",
-      "version": "1.3.3",
+      "version": "1.3.7",
       "category": "Version Control",
       "source": "./plugins/git"
     },
     {
       "name": "gitea",
-      "description": "Skills for managing Gitea repositories — issues, pull requests, milestones, releases, and wikis.",
+      "description": "Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.",
-      "version": "1.3.4",
+      "version": "1.3.8",
       "category": "Version Control",
       "source": "./plugins/gitea"
     },
     {
       "name": "core",
       "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
-      "version": "1.1.1",
+      "version": "1.1.2",
       "category": "Productivity",
       "source": "./plugins/core"
     },
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
     {
       "name": "lint",
       "description": "Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.",
-      "version": "1.1.6",
+      "version": "1.1.7",
       "category": "Developer Tools",
       "source": "./plugins/lint"
     }

.github/plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "holocron",
   "description": "AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.",
-  "version": "0.4.2",
+  "version": "0.4.6",
   "owner": {
     "name": "Defame1297",
     "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",
@@ -11,35 +11,35 @@
     {
       "name": "kyberforge",
       "description": "Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.",
-      "version": "1.6.0",
+      "version": "1.6.2",
       "category": "Developer Tools",
       "source": "./plugins/kyberforge"
     },
     {
       "name": "bin",
-      "description": "A place for things to be binned",
+      "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
-      "version": "1.1.3",
+      "version": "1.1.7",
       "category": "Utilities",
       "source": "./plugins/bin"
     },
     {
       "name": "git",
-      "description": "Skills for working with Git — conventional commits, branch management, pull requests, and feature flow.",
+      "description": "Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.",
-      "version": "1.3.3",
+      "version": "1.3.7",
       "category": "Version Control",
       "source": "./plugins/git"
     },
     {
       "name": "gitea",
-      "description": "Skills for managing Gitea repositories — issues, pull requests, milestones, releases, and wikis.",
+      "description": "Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.",
-      "version": "1.3.4",
+      "version": "1.3.8",
       "category": "Version Control",
       "source": "./plugins/gitea"
     },
     {
       "name": "core",
       "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
-      "version": "1.1.1",
+      "version": "1.1.2",
       "category": "Productivity",
       "source": "./plugins/core"
     },
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
     {
       "name": "lint",
       "description": "Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.",
-      "version": "1.1.6",
+      "version": "1.1.7",
       "category": "Developer Tools",
       "source": "./plugins/lint"
     }

.pre-commit-config.yaml

@@ -75,15 +75,6 @@ repos:
         pass_filenames: false
         always_run: true
 
-      - id: check-manifests
-        name: Check plugin manifests
-        description: Validate marketplace.json and plugin.json paths
-        entry: bash scripts/check-manifests.sh
-        language: system
-        stages: [pre-push]
-        pass_filenames: false
-        always_run: true
-
       - id: check-plugin-content-sync
         name: Check plugin content sync
         description: Verify each plugin's flat skills/agents/commands/hooks/hooks.json mirror is in sync with .apm/ -- Claude Code has no .apm/ awareness so this compiled mirror must stay current (see issue #90)
@@ -113,7 +104,7 @@ repos:
 
       - id: apm-marketplace-check
         name: apm marketplace check
-        description: Validate every marketplace.packages[] entry resolves, including network reachability of remote refs -- catches stale/unreachable remote package references that check-manifests.sh deliberately skips (local-source checks only)
+        description: Validate every marketplace.packages[] entry resolves, including network reachability of remote refs -- the only hook that checks remote package references rather than local-source paths
         entry: apm marketplace check
         language: system
         stages: [pre-push]
@@ -207,7 +198,7 @@ repos:
         # pre-commit prints nothing at all for a passing hook, so without this
         # the opt-out reinstated exactly the silent vacuous pass the script was
         # written to kill, one level up -- the run showed a bare `Passed` and
-        # AGENTS.md's instruction to read that summary line was impossible to
+        # the documented instruction to read that summary line was impossible to
         # follow in the one situation the opt-out exists for. The script's clean
         # output is a single line, so this costs one line per push.
 
@@ -247,25 +238,6 @@ repos:
         pass_filenames: false
         always_run: true
 
-      - id: skill-frontmatter
-        stages: ['pre-commit']
-        name: SKILL.md frontmatter validation
-        description: Ensure SKILL.md files have required frontmatter fields
-        entry: bash
-        language: system
-        files: '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$'
-        args:
-          - -c
-          - |
-            for f in "$@"; do
-              if [[ -f "$f" ]]; then
-                if ! grep -q "^name:" "$f" || ! grep -q "^description:" "$f"; then
-                  echo "ERROR: $f is missing required frontmatter fields (name: and description:)"
-                  exit 1
-                fi
-              fi
-            done
-
       - id: skill-size-check
         stages: ['pre-commit']
         name: SKILL.md size and context-budget ceilings
@@ -284,6 +256,21 @@ repos:
         # records for Vale warnings. Costs nothing on a clean file: the script
         # prints only findings.
 
+      - id: check-rtk-prefix
+        stages: ['pre-commit']
+        name: ADR-0023 rtk prefix on executable git commands
+        description: Enforce ADR-0023 clause 1 -- an executable, instructed git command in a shell code fence or a dispatch-table Run cell is written `rtk git`. Clauses 2 and 3 are not machine-decidable; a deliberately bare command opts out with the literal string ADR-0023 on its own line
+        entry: scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh
+        language: script
+        files: '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/(skills/.*\.md|agents/.*\.agent\.md)$'
+        # README.md is excluded on purpose, not by oversight. A skill-directory
+        # README is consumer-facing prose that no agent ever loads, and the
+        # `git clone` lines in the seven tests/README.md files are setup
+        # instructions for a third party who has no rtk installed. Prefixing
+        # those would be actively wrong -- see ADR-0023's consumer section.
+        exclude: '(^|/)README\.md$'
+        pass_filenames: true
+
       - id: vale-audit-prefilter-skill
         stages: ['pre-commit']
         name: Vale audit prefilter (SKILL.md)

AGENTS.md

@@ -1,29 +1,25 @@
 # Working in this repo
 
-This repo is the global AI development configuration repository — the authoritative source for agent definitions, skills, workflows, and prompts across all projects. Built as a homelab tool intended to scale to professional environments.
+The global AI development configuration repository — the authoritative source for agent definitions, skills, workflows, and prompts across all projects.
+
+This file carries only what applies to **every** session. Setup, prerequisites, and test commands are in `README.md`; the reasoning behind each enforcement gate is in `docs/spec/gates.md`.
 
 ## Structure
 
-- `plugins/` — installable plugin units; each is an apm package (`apm.yml` + `.apm/`) carrying skills, agents, hooks, MCP servers, and bundled assets. This repo consumes them through **apm**, not Claude Code's native plugin install: root `apm.yml` declares all six as `dependencies.apm` git+path entries against the holocron remote, and `apm install` deploys them into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/` (both gitignored). External consumers can still install natively via `claude plugin install <name>@holocron` — the marketplace manifests are unchanged
+- `plugins/` — six installable plugin units, each an apm package (`apm.yml` + `.apm/`). Root `apm.yml` declares all six as `dependencies.apm`; `apm install` deploys them into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`, both gitignored install output.
-- `providers/claude-code/` — Claude Code adapter (deployed to `~/.claude/` via `install.sh`)
+- `providers/claude-code/` — Claude Code adapter, deployed to `~/.claude/` via `scripts/install.sh`.
 
 ## Edit `.apm/`, never the flat mirror
 
-Inside a plugin, `plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the **only** hand-edited source for **plugin content** — the skills, agents, commands, instructions, extensions and hooks a host discovers. Everything in a plugin root that mirrors an `.apm/` primitive, plus both `plugin.json` manifests, is generated:
+`plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the only hand-edited source for plugin content. The flat `plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,commands,instructions,extensions}/` directories, the merged `plugins/<name>/hooks/hooks.json`, and both `plugin.json` manifests are generated — nothing marks them as generated, so check the path before you edit. An edit to the mirror is discarded by the next sync and reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook.
 
-- `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` generates the flat `plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,commands,instructions,extensions}/` directories and the merged `plugins/<name>/hooks/hooks.json` (ADR-0017)
+Not everything in a plugin root is generated. `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json` and per-plugin extras are hand-authored there with no `.apm/` source — edit those in place. The rule is per-path, not per-directory. But a file placed *inside* a mirrored directory is deleted on the next sync (`sync_dir` runs `rm -rf` before every copy), so plugin-root documentation goes in `docs/`, never in `hooks/` or `skills/`.
-- `apm pack` generates both per-plugin manifests — `plugins/<name>/.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `plugins/<name>/.github/plugin/plugin.json` — and **two of the three** root marketplace manifests: `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (apm's `claude` output profile) and `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (its `codex` profile, a differently-shaped file) (ADR-0015)
-- `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` generates the third, `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` — Copilot CLI's legacy manifest path. **No apm output profile targets it**: apm ships exactly two marketplace output profiles, `claude` and `codex` (documented in `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/apm-workflow/references/marketplace.md`). The mirror is a byte-identical copy of `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, gated by the `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` pre-push hook. Do not expect `apm pack` to refresh it — that assumption is exactly the drift this pair exists to prevent
 
-**A plugin root is not wholly generated.** Material that is not an `.apm/` primitive is hand-authored there and no compiler touches it: `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json`, plus per-plugin extras like `plugins/git/config.example.json`, `plugins/gitea/references/` and `plugins/bin/evals/`. Edit those in place — they have no `.apm/` source, and looking for one wastes a search. The rule is per-path, not per-directory: `plugins/<name>/skills/` is generated, `plugins/<name>/docs/` is not. `docs/spec/architecture.md` carries the same carve-out.
+Full model: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
-
-One qualification: "hand-authored, untouched" holds only at the plugin *root*. A file placed **inside** a mirrored directory is destroyed — `sync_dir` runs `rm -rf "$dst"` before every copy, so a `README.md` under `plugins/<name>/hooks/` or `plugins/<name>/skills/` is deleted on the next sync whether or not `.apm/` has a counterpart. Put root-level plugin documentation in `docs/`, never in a mirrored directory.
-
-Nothing labels a generated file as generated — `plugins/kyberforge/skills/forge/SKILL.md` is byte-identical to its `.apm/` original, with no marker in either. Check the path before you edit. An edit to the mirror is discarded by the next sync and is reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook, which is the earliest anyone finds out. Details in `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
 
 ## Prefer plugin skills over raw shell
 
-This repo dogfoods its own plugins. Before shelling out to git, gitea, or lint tooling directly, check whether an installed skill already owns the operation — it usually does:
+This repo dogfoods its own plugins. Before shelling out, check whether a skill already owns the operation — it usually does:
 
 - Commits, branches, history, worktrees, remotes → `git-commits`, `git-branches`, `git-history`, `git-worktrees`, `git-remotes`
 - Pre-commit hook install/config/troubleshooting → `pc-run` / `pc-author`
@@ -31,40 +27,29 @@ This repo dogfoods its own plugins. Before shelling out to git, gitea, or lint t
 - Vale prose linting → `vale-config` / `vale-run`
 - This repo's own AGENTS.md → `agentsmd-author` / `agentsmd-audit`
 
-Use the bare, **unnamespaced** names above. Under the old `claude plugin install` these were `git:git-commits`, `kyberforge:skill-audit`, and so on; `apm install` deploys each skill to `.claude/skills/<name>/` as a plain project skill, which has no plugin prefix to carry. The `<plugin>:` form has not stopped resolving here, though — `~/.claude.json` still enables `core`, `git`, `gitea`, `kyberforge`, and `lint` at **user** scope, and ADR-0018 left those native installs in place on purpose, converting them being a separate decision with a blast radius beyond this repo. Every skill is therefore live under both names right now, and a working `gitea:gitea-prs` is the user-scope copy answering — not evidence that the apm install or this file is broken, and not something to "fix". Prefer the bare name anyway: apm deploys it, an external consumer installing holocron through apm gets it, and it is the form that survives those user-scope installs eventually being converted. The namespaced form also still resolves in any project that installs holocron natively, so a skill body written for both audiences should name the bare skill. Same for agents: `git-orchestrate`, not `git:git-orchestrate`.
+Use the bare, **unnamespaced** names. That is what `apm install` deploys and the only form this repo's own install produces — a project skill has no plugin to prefix (ADR-0018). Whether the `<plugin>:` form (`gitea:gitea-prs`) also resolves depends on native plugin installs at user scope, outside this repo; write the bare name either way.
 
 Fall back to raw shell only when no skill covers it.
 
-## Setup and testing
+## Session rules
 
-- Run `apm install` to deploy this repo's own skills and agents into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`. Both are gitignored install output, not authoring source — `plugins/<name>/.apm/` remains the only place to edit. The six dependencies in root `apm.yml` resolve from the holocron **remote**, unpinned against the default branch, so a `.apm/` edit is not visible to the running session until it is pushed and `apm update` re-runs (`apm install` deploys from `apm.lock.yaml` and does not re-resolve refs). Needs the network, and needs `apm_modules/` (which it materializes) left gitignored. `apm install` also configures the `obsidian` MCP server into the repo's `.mcp.json`, carried over from `plugins/bin/.mcp.json`.
+- **Do not add repo-owned keys to `.claude/settings.json`.** apm treats it as its own deployed artifact and `apm audit --ci` replays the install and diffs, so anything apm would not have written is permanent drift that fails the `apm-audit-ci` pre-push hook. A hook you want here is authored in `plugins/<name>/.apm/hooks/` and deployed by apm, never hand-written into that file. The `SessionStart` entry already in it is exactly that: kyberforge authors it in `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/hooks/hooks.json` and apm merges it in, so it is apm's own output, it is what the replay expects, and it belongs in the commit — do not strip it (ADR-0019). Machine-specific settings go in the gitignored `.claude/settings.local.json`; shared enforcement goes in `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
-- Do not add repo-owned keys to `.claude/settings.json`. apm treats that file as its own deployed artifact: `apm audit --ci` replays the install into a scratch tree and diffs, so anything apm would not have written there — an `enabledPlugins` block, a real `hooks` entry — is permanent drift that fails the `apm-audit-ci` pre-push hook. Its committed content is whatever apm last wrote, which today is the merged `SessionStart` entry for kyberforge's `check-apm-current.sh` — apm's own output, and it belongs in the commit (ADR-0019). What does not change is that nothing repo-authored goes in the file. A hook you want in this repo is authored in `plugins/<name>/.apm/hooks/` and deployed by apm, never hand-written here. The file is also **excluded from `pretty-format-json`** in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` — the sixth and last alternation in that `exclude:` pattern, and the only one there for a reason other than "generated manifest". Mind which number you are quoting: six alternations, expanding to sixteen real files (3 root marketplace manifests, 2 per plugin × 6 plugins, plus this one). `pretty-format-json --autofix` sorts object keys while apm emits insertion order, so leaving the file in that hook's scope rewrites apm's output on the way into every commit and `apm audit --ci` then reports permanent drift on a file with an empty `git diff`. Do not tidy it out of that list; it is load-bearing (see `LESSONS.md`, 2026-08-14). Machine-specific settings go in the gitignored `.claude/settings.local.json`, which apm does not deploy and the replay does not compare; shared enforcement belongs in `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
+- **`apm.lock.yaml` turning up modified is expected, not a bug.** kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook runs `apm outdated` at startup and `apm update --yes` when something is behind, which rewrites the lock. Commit or discard it deliberately.
-- Keeping the install current is automatic but not free. Because the six dependencies are unpinned, deployed skills go stale whenever anyone merges. kyberforge ships a `SessionStart` hook that runs `apm outdated` at startup (~0.7s) and, when something is behind, runs `apm update --yes` and asks the host to re-scan skills (~10.4s). That rewrites `apm.lock.yaml`, so an unexplained modification to it after opening a session is expected, not a bug — commit or discard it deliberately. Note `apm install` alone will **not** pick up remote changes; it deploys from the lock. `apm update` is the command that re-resolves refs.
+- **A `.apm/` edit is not live in this session until it is pushed.** The six dependencies resolve from the holocron remote, unpinned against the default branch. `apm install` deploys from the lock; `apm update` is what re-resolves refs.
-- Install git hooks via `pc-run`, wiring all three stages — this repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` has no `default_install_hook_types`, so a plain install silently skips `commit-msg` (Conventional Commits) and `pre-push` (the 14-hook gate described below).
+- **Pushing without a network** needs `SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push` — those two resolve a remote marketplace entry via `git ls-remote`. Skip only those two; the rest are real local checks, and adding one to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
-- Install the `apm` CLI — four pre-push hooks shell out to it: `apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, and `check-plugin-content-sync` (via `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, which wraps `apm pack`). `apm-marketplace-check` and `apm-pack-check-clean` are bare `apm …` hook entries and `apm-audit-ci` is a `bash -c` loop calling `apm` once per package, so without it the push dies with an unhelpful "command not found". Use `apm-install`, or `curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix | sh`; verify with `apm --version`.
+- **This repo and Gitea are the only source of truth.** All project state, decisions, and working conventions live here. Do not use an external memory system for this project — cached state diverges from the repo and you get a split brain. Before answering any design or architecture question, check `docs/adr/` for an existing decision.
-- Install `jq` — required by `scripts/check-manifests.sh` and `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, both pre-push. These at least fail loudly (`Error: jq is required but not installed`).
-- Install `python3` — required by `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`, the `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook. It measures the *folded* `description` value: most descriptions here are `>`-block scalars, so a regex over the raw lines measures indentation and newlines instead of the value. Missing it fails the hook with an install pointer rather than skipping the ADR-0020 checks, which would be a vacuous green. In practice it is already present — pre-commit is itself a Python application. **PyYAML is a hard requirement too**, not an optional accelerator: the hand-rolled fallback frontmatter reader has been removed, because a reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file it never measured, which is the exact vacuous-green failure the `python3` check exists to avoid. `pip install pyyaml` if the hook reports it missing.
-- That hook enforces **two independent gate families** over `plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`, and neither replaced the other. The agentskills.io spec backstop is unchanged: 500 lines and 2,770 words, counted over the **whole file including frontmatter**. ADR-0020 adds a context budget measured differently — `description` 250 chars SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL (it is preloaded into every session whether the skill fires or not), **body-only** word count 600 SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL (everything after the frontmatter's closing `---`), a missing, valueless or `null` `description:` (a hard FAIL, not a skip — a gate that declines to measure the one preloaded field reports green), every boundary-clause routing target resolving to a real skill or agent, and every `references/<file>.md` a body names actually existing. Target resolution walks up **from the file being checked** to an authoring root — the nearest ancestor holding `plugins/*/.apm/{skills,agents}`, falling back to the nearest `.git`, in two passes so a nested `.git` cannot beat a real monorepo root. The universe is then every skill and agent under `<root>/plugins/*/`, plus the checked file's own apm package and whatever that package declares in its own `apm.yml` `dependencies.apm`; the **root** manifest's `dependencies:` block is not read, and no plugin here declares a cross-plugin apm dependency. Deployed `.claude/`/`.agents/` trees are consulted only when the walk found no plugin monorepo root — whether it landed on a bare `.git` ancestor or on nothing at all (the consumer case). The gate keys on which of the two passes matched, not on whether the root contributed any new name: a single-plugin monorepo re-collects its own package and adds nothing, so a name-count test reads zero there and would drag the deployed trees back into the universe. That matters because those trees are gitignored `apm install` output: resolution used to reach the four cross-plugin `gitea-*` → `git-*` targets through `.claude/skills/` alone, so the same commit measured 2 dangling targets on a developer machine and 6 on a fresh clone. It no longer does — verified by running the hook over a tree holding only `plugins/` and the root `apm.yml`, which reports findings identical to the working tree (26 description / 9 body / 2 dangling / 0 missing references / 58 SUGGESTIONs). Three further checks are SUGGESTION-only: a description with no boundary clause at all, a `## Gotchas` section with more than five entries, and a `## Gotchas` section over 25% of the body. A file can sit well inside one family and fail the other. The hook is `verbose: true` so the SUGGESTION tier is audible — pre-commit prints nothing at all for a passing hook, and a SUGGESTION deliberately does not fail. `skill-audit`'s `validate.sh` holds a second copy of the four ADR-0020 constants; `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh` asserts the copies agree.
-- **Those ADR-0020 gates ship hot, with no baseline file.** 26 of 39 descriptions and 9 of 39 bodies currently exceed their FAIL tier, so editing one of those skills *for any reason* means retrofitting it to the contract first — a one-line fix to `gitea-prs` cannot be committed until that skill complies. This is deliberate, and the retrofit is tracked as Gitea issue #99. Check where a skill stands before starting: `pre-commit run skill-size-check --all-files`.
-- **A second gate ships hot alongside it, and `skill-size-check` will not warn you about it.** `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` — the ADR-0020 Vale rule banning composition and architecture prose from a description — currently fires **10 errors across four skills**: `gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs` and `gitea-workflow`. Every Vale rule here is `level: error` with no ignorable tier, so touching any of those four means fixing its prose findings as well as its size findings. Scoping a retrofit off `skill-size-check` output alone will leave you blocked at the second gate. Check both: `pre-commit run --all-files`.
-- Install the `vale` binary — required by the `vale-audit-prefilter-skill`/`-agent` pre-commit hooks. Their `files:` patterns are `.apm/`-scoped: `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` and `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/agents/[^/]+\.agent\.md$`. Only the authoring source triggers them — a `SKILL.md` in the generated mirror matches neither pattern, so prose findings surface only when you edit the file you are supposed to be editing. Without the binary the hooks fail with a bare "command not found" and no install pointer. `brew install vale` (macOS), `snap install vale` (Linux), `choco install vale` (Windows), or see https://vale.sh/docs/vale-cli/installation/. No `vale sync` needed — the `Kyberforge` styles are committed under `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/{skill-audit,agent-audit}/assets/vale/styles/`, not downloaded packages (see ADR-0014).
-- `vale` is also a **pre-push** dependency, not only pre-commit. `check-vale-style-sync` runs six glob-coverage probes by invoking `vale --config` — they are the only assertions in it that catch a `.vale.ini` glob typo, the failure mode where every text-level check stays clean while vale lints zero files. Missing `vale` is therefore a hard failure there. The opt-out is `CHECK_VALE_STYLE_SYNC_ALLOW_MISSING_VALE=1`, and it is **not** `SKIP=`: the hook still runs and still asserts everything verifiable from file text, but the six probes do not, and its summary says so explicitly — `Vale style sync check passed (text-level only, vale unavailable): … 0 glob probe(s) verified`. Use it only on a machine that genuinely cannot install `vale`, and read that summary line as "the glob axis was not checked", not as a pass.
-- Run `bash tests/run-tests.sh` before considering any change done — it runs every `test-*.sh` script in the repo plus the bats suite (`--bats-only` for just bats). First run auto-initializes the bats submodules; no manual `git submodule update` needed.
-- A suite that exits 77 because a dependency is missing is reported as SKIPPED, and does **not** fail an ad-hoc run. The pre-push hook invokes the same script as `--strict` (`RUN_TESTS_STRICT=1` is equivalent), where a skip **does** fail the push: at pre-push a skip means one of the dependencies above is absent on this machine, so the gate would otherwise report success having run fewer suites than it appears to. Without vale, for instance, three suites skip (`test-check-vale-style-sync.sh`, `test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh`, `test-vale-wrap.sh`) and the strict failure names each one and what to install.
-- `tests/run-bats.sh` derives the set of `.bats` files it expects from `git ls-files`, so a `.bats` file deleted from the worktree but still tracked in the index fails the run rather than silently shrinking the suite. Remove one with `git rm` (or stage the deletion) when the removal is intentional; an untracked new `.bats` file is picked up and needs no ceremony. Both discovery walks (`tests/run-bats.sh` and `tests/run-tests.sh`) exclude `apm_modules/`: `apm install` materializes a full copy of every plugin there, and running a dependency's copy of a `.bats` file breaks its relative path to the bats helpers — 167 spurious failures before the exclusion landed.
-- Pushing runs 14 repo-defined pre-push hooks, not just the test suite — `run-tests` and `check-manifests`, plus generated-content drift gates (`check-plugin-content-sync`, `check-marketplace-mirror-sync`, `check-vale-style-sync`, `check-scope-walkup-sync`, `check-executables-allow-sync`), artifact validators (`check-apm-agents-valid`, which runs agent-audit's `validate.sh` over every real `plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md`), apm's own gates (`apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`, `apm-pack-check-clean`), host validators (`validate-plugins`, `validate-marketplace`, both needing the `claude` CLI), and `check-release-needed`. `check-executables-allow-sync` is the odd one in that first group — it guards a silent failure rather than drift in generated text. apm gates a package's `hooks/` and `bin/` on an exact `<package>#<version>` lookup in root `apm.yml`'s `executables.allow`, with no wildcard and no version-less form, so bumping `plugins/kyberforge/apm.yml`'s `version:` without bumping the key errors nowhere: the entry simply stops matching, kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook stops deploying, and the install goes quietly stale — the failure ADR-0019 records as live. Run `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files` locally — one command, the whole gate. That command reports **16**, not 14: pre-commit's own `meta` hooks, `check-hooks-apply` and `check-useless-excludes`, declare no `stages:` and so run at every stage including this one.
-- `apm-audit-ci` runs `apm audit --ci` once per manifest — the root one and each of the six plugin packages — because the root-only invocation audits the marketplace manifest and **nothing else**, and `apm-pack-check-clean` does not parse plugin `dependencies:` blocks either (verified: a malformed one passes `apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run` and fails `apm audit --ci` in that package's directory). It verifies two things and claims no more: each `apm.yml` parses as a valid APM manifest, and any package declaring dependencies has a consistent `apm.lock.yaml`. It does **not** enforce an org policy — apm discovers one from the git remote and only understands github.com and Azure DevOps, so against this repo's self-hosted Gitea remote it prints `No org policy found at unknown; enforcement skipped`. Do **not** "fix" that with `policy.fetch_failure_default: block` in `apm.yml`: it was tested and rejected, because with no reachable policy source it makes the hook exit 1 on every push forever.
-- `check-apm-agents-valid` derives its expected agent-file set from `git ls-files` (same pattern as `tests/run-bats.sh`), so an agent file deleted from the worktree but still tracked fails the run, and discovering zero agent files is an error rather than a pass. An untracked new agent file is still validated — the derivation is one-directional on purpose, so uncommitted work is not blocked but also cannot bypass the gate. Agents take the ADR-0020 description gates (`agent-audit`'s `validate.sh` holds its own copy of those two constants) and, deliberately, **no** body word gate: an agent body becomes the system prompt of a fresh context rather than competing with the caller's live conversation, so the 900-word FAIL does not transfer. A bats test pins that absence in `agent-audit`'s validator — adding a body gate there contradicts the ADR rather than fixing an inconsistency. Be precise about the scope of that guarantee, though: it holds for the **validator**, not for the shared script. `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` applies its body gate to whatever path it is handed, and `bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md` exits 1 today with 900-word body FAILs on `git-orchestrate` (933), `gitea-orchestrate` (1,199) and `apm-orchestrate` (1,080). Agent files escape only because the hook definitions filter on `SKILL.md` — a file-pattern accident that happens to implement the design, not the design itself. Do not "extend" that hook's `files:` pattern to cover agents on the assumption that the script already knows the difference.
-- **Two** pre-push hooks need the network, for one shared reason: root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace.packages[]` contains exactly one remote entry (`mattpocock-skills`, `source: mattpocock/skills`), and resolving it needs a `git ls-remote`. `apm-marketplace-check` resolves every entry and is `always_run`, so it fails with `No cached refs (offline)`. `apm-pack-check-clean` (`apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run`) re-resolves the same entry and fails with `Error: Git network timeout during ls-remote`. Pinning the entry to an exact version does **not** remove the call — an exact pin still ls-remotes. `--offline` rescues neither. To push without a network, skip both using pre-commit's own mechanism: `SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push`. Skip those two alone — verified under `unshare -rn`, the other twelve pre-push hooks pass offline because they are real local checks (`check-executables-allow-sync` landed after that run, but reads two local manifests and makes no network call), and adding one of them to `SKIP` disarms it silently. `apm-audit-ci` calls `apm` too but stays local: its org-policy discovery resolves nothing on this remote before any network call, so it does not join the pair above.
-- Author commits with `git-commits` — it validates Conventional Commits (enforced at `commit-msg`) for you.
 
 ## Key documents
 
-Read CONTEXT.md at the start of every session in this repo.
+Read `CONTEXT.md` at the start of every session — it is this repo's domain glossary, and the terms it defines are used unglossed everywhere else. It is not exhaustive: terms it does not carry are defined at their point of use, mostly in `docs/spec/`.
 
 Read these on demand:
 
-- `docs/spec/architecture.md` — current directory structure, install pipeline, provider model
+- `README.md` — prerequisites, install, and test commands
+- `docs/VISION.md` — the phased roadmap and where this is going; read when a decision turns on product direction
+- `LESSONS.md` — patterns that went wrong once; read before repeating a class of change that has burned the repo before
+- `docs/spec/gates.md` — what each pre-commit and pre-push hook enforces and why; read when a gate fails or before changing hook config
+- `docs/spec/architecture.md` — directory structure, install pipeline, provider model
 - `docs/adr/` — architectural decisions; read before answering design questions or proposing structural changes
 - `docs/ai-constitution.md` — full governance evidence base; read when a governance decision needs justification
 - `docs/research/ai-coding-factory/ai-coding-factory-principles.md` — factory design rationale; read when implementing, auditing, or reviewing skills or factory structure

CONTEXT.md

@@ -1,106 +1,240 @@
 ---
 name: AI Development Repo
-description: Domain language and decisions for the global AI development config repository
+description: The domain language of the global AI development config repository
 ---
 
-# Context
+# AI Development Repo
 
-## Principles
+The bounded context of this repo is **how agent instructions are authored, packaged, distributed, and
+kept small**. Terms here name concepts specific to that problem. Mechanics live elsewhere:
+`docs/spec/architecture.md` for structure, `docs/spec/gates.md` for enforcement, `docs/adr/` for
+decisions.
 
-### CLAUDE.md index model
+## Language
-`AGENTS.md` is the source of always-on universal rules (provider-agnostic). `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` is a thin adapter: it imports `~/.agents/AGENTS.md` via `@~/.agents/AGENTS.md` and appends Claude Code-specific additions (`@import` for governance.md, content index). Deployed to `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` via `install.sh`. Context size is kept minimal — only what is needed every session is loaded upfront; detailed content is pulled on demand. See ADR-0003.
 
-### Instruction file format
+### Context cost
-`core/instructions/<topic>.md` files are plain markdown — no frontmatter, no schema. The agent decides when to read each file based on task context and the content index label in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md`. Frontmatter is deferred until there is evidence that agents are loading the wrong files in practice.
 
-### Repo/gitea as source of truth
+**Preload tax**:
-All project state, decisions, context, and working conventions live in this repo or Gitea. External memory systems should not be used for this project — they create a split-brain risk where cached state diverges from the repo. At the start of every session, read `CLAUDE.md`, `CONTEXT.md`, and `docs/VISION.md`. Everything needed to orient is here.
+The always-on context cost of every installed skill's `name` and `description`, charged from the
+first token of every session whether the skill is invoked or not. Measurement method: ADR-0020. Its
+**23,427 characters is the pre-retrofit baseline, not a current reading** — measured at the decision
+commit, before #99. Across the same 39 skills it is **10,478 characters** (~2,620 tokens) as of
+2026-09-01. Both figures move with the corpus, so re-derive rather than quote either: sum
+`len(name) + len(description)` over the frontmatter of every `plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`,
+folding block scalars as `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` does.
+_Avoid_: context cost, token overhead
 
-Before answering any design or architecture question, check for existing decisions: `docs/adr/` (hard architectural decisions).
+**Skill context contract**:
+The ADR-0020 authoring rules that hold the preload tax and body size down — a description carries a
+trigger clause, at most one capability clause, and a boundary clause, and nothing else. Thresholds
+and the target-resolution walk: `docs/spec/gates.md`.
+_Avoid_: skill budget, size limit
 
-## Glossary
+**Routing target**:
+The skill or agent name a boundary clause sends work to. It **resolves** when a skill or agent of
+that name is reachable from the file being checked, and **dangles** when none is — a route the router
+cannot take. Dangling is a blocking ERROR in route notation (`/name`, `→ name`) and a SUGGESTION for
+a bare name nothing else in the sentence corroborates. Verdicts and the resolution walk:
+`docs/spec/gates.md`.
+_Avoid_: route, pointer, cross-reference
 
-### Management Application
+**Dispatch body**:
-A separate product (separate repo) for browsing, editing, and configuring AI development configs through a proper product UI. Git is the persistence layer, invisible to the user. The app is repo-agnostic — it works with any git repo that follows these conventions. This repo is the canonical default content (the official starter). See `docs/VISION.md` for the phased roadmap.
+The body pattern a skill with two or more mutually exclusive flows must use — the body carries only
+the dispatch table and the gates common to every branch, and each flow lives in its own
+self-contained `references/` file. Exemplar: `apm-workflow`.
+_Avoid_: router body, thin body
 
-### Skills
+**Hand-invoked skill**:
-Reusable slash commands for AI coding tools, defined as `SKILL.md` files following the [Agent Skills open standard](https://agentskills.io). Authored at `plugins/<plugin-name>/.apm/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` and reaching a host by one of two install paths: `apm install`, which deploys the skill directory to `.claude/skills/<skill-name>/` (this repo's own path — see "apm-consumed install"), or `claude plugin install <name>@<marketplace>`, which caches the whole plugin (still supported for external consumers). Skills are self-contained — they cannot reference files outside the plugin directory after install-time caching. The two paths name skills differently: apm deploys a plain project skill (`skill-audit`), a plugin install namespaces it (`kyberforge:skill-audit`).
+A skill reached only by typing its slash command, declared `disable-model-invocation: true`. The host
+withholds it from the model-visible listing entirely, so it pays no preload tax and its description
+becomes human-facing text. The flag also hard-blocks the Skill tool, so **no other skill can route to
+a hand-invoked skill** — a `` Call `x` `` step in another skill's body stops working the moment `x`
+takes the flag. Check inbound routes before declaring one. Exemplar: `zoom-out`.
+_Avoid_: manual skill, disabled skill
 
-### Preload tax
+**Delegation discipline**:
-The always-on context cost of every installed skill's `name` + `description`, which sit in the agent's context from the first token of every session whether or not the skill is invoked. Measured 2026-08-14 against base commit `f9b919d` at 23,427 chars (~5,900 tokens) across 39 skills, plus 1,325 chars for 4 agents. Method, so it can be re-run: sum `len(name) + len(description)` over each `plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md` frontmatter with `>` block scalars folded to the value the host loads, at ~4 characters per token. Non-routing frontmatter (`metadata.source_keys`, `category`, `version`) is **not** part of it — the model-visible skill listing carries only `name` and `description`, which supersedes `LESSONS.md:63` on this host. Bodies are not part of it either; they are charged on invocation.
+The agent-side counterpart to the dispatch body. A plugin-scope agent is a single `.agent.md` file
+with no sibling `references/` directory, so it cannot disclose to itself — it can only delegate to
+skills. Its characteristic defect is therefore restatement, not length.
+_Avoid_: agent hygiene
 
-### Skill context contract
+### Distribution
-The authoring rules that hold the preload tax and body size down, set by ADR-0020. A description carries a trigger clause, at most one capability clause, and a boundary clause of the form `Not <thing> → <skill-name>` naming a resolvable target — nothing else. "Resolvable" is decided by walking up *from the file being checked* to an **authoring root** — the nearest ancestor holding `plugins/*/.apm/{skills,agents}`, falling back to the nearest `.git`, in two passes so a nested `.git` cannot outrank a real monorepo root. The universe is then every skill and agent under `<root>/plugins/*/` (sibling plugins resolve against each other, which is what a monorepo means), plus the checked file's own apm package and that package's own declared `dependencies.apm`. The **root** manifest's dependency list is never consulted, and no plugin here declares a cross-plugin apm dependency. Deployed `.claude/`/`.agents/` trees count only when there is no authoring root at all — the consumer case. The property this buys is that one commit gets one verdict: those trees are gitignored `apm install` output, so resolving through them made the same commit report 2 dangling targets on a developer machine and 6 on a fresh clone, which a gate shipping hot with no baseline cannot do. A `${BASH_SOURCE}`-relative repo root is the other half of the same defect and is gone — it leaked this repo's 39-skill universe into consumer repos running the hook through pre-commit. A *missing* boundary clause is a SUGGESTION rather than a failure, for skills and agents alike — some skills genuinely have no near-miss sibling. A *missing or empty description* is the opposite: a hard FAIL in all three validators, because a gate that merely declines to measure the one preloaded field reports green. Capability enumeration, output formats, and composition notes ("composes X rather than duplicating Y") belong in the body or `README.md`; a description that summarises workflow is a correctness hazard, not just a cost, because agents act on it instead of reading the body. Sizes are two-tier and sit *below* the agentskills.io spec limits, which stay unchanged as conformance backstops: description 250 SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL (spec 1,024); body 600 SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL (spec 2,770 words / 500 lines). Conflating the quality gate with the spec ceiling is what let `skill-author` and `agent-author` grow to within twelve words of 2,770.
 
-### Dispatch body
+**Skill**:
-The body pattern a skill with two or more mutually exclusive flows must use: the body carries only the dispatch table and the gates common to every branch, and each flow lives in its own self-contained `references/` file. Named for `apm-workflow` (421-word body, 3,006 words of references), which arrived at it independently and is the repo's exemplar. Its absence was the characteristic defect at the time ADR-0020 was written: `skill-author` inlined both its create and improve flows, and `agent-author` carried 50-60 lines marked inapplicable by their own headers on any single run. Both were retrofitted to dispatch tables in the change that carries the ADR — `skill-author` went 2,623 body words to 595 and `agent-author` 2,582 to 616 — so they are now worked examples of the pattern rather than counter-examples of it. The 39-skill corpus at large is not: 9 bodies still exceed the 900-word FAIL (issue #99).
+A reusable slash command defined as a `SKILL.md` file following the
+[Agent Skills open standard](https://agentskills.io), authored at
+`plugins/<plugin>/.apm/skills/<skill>/SKILL.md`.
+_Avoid_: command, prompt, macro
 
-### Hand-invoked skill
+**Plugin**:
-A skill reached only by typing its slash command, declared with `disable-model-invocation: true`. The host withholds it from the model-visible skill listing entirely, so it pays no preload tax and its `description` becomes human-facing text rather than a trigger list. `zoom-out` is the worked example: apm passes the flag through verbatim to both install paths, and the skill is absent from the router while `/zoom-out` still works. Choosing model-invoked vs. hand-invoked is the first question `skill-author` asks, because it determines whether a description needs triggers at all.
+The deployable unit — one or more skills, agents, hooks, commands, and MCP servers bundled into a
+single installable directory under `plugins/<name>/`, compiled from that plugin's `.apm/` source.
+_Avoid_: package, bundle, module
 
-### Delegation discipline
+**apm package**:
-The agent-side counterpart to the dispatch body. A plugin-scope agent is a single `.apm/agents/<name>.agent.md` file with no sibling `references/` directory, so it cannot disclose to itself — it can only delegate to skills. Its characteristic defect is therefore restatement, not length: an agent body that spells out a procedure a skill it can invoke already owns creates a second copy that drifts. `agent-audit` fails that, with the fix being "invoke `<skill>` instead". Agents take the same description gates as skills but no body word gate — a skill body competes with the caller's live conversation, an agent body becomes the system prompt of a fresh context.
+The unit apm builds and installs — `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` plus the hand-authored
+`plugins/<name>/.apm/` tree it compiles from (ADR-0015).
+_Avoid_: plugin directory, source tree
 
-### Plugin
+**Content mirror**:
-The deployable unit in the plugin marketplace. A plugin bundles one or more skills, agents, hooks, prompts, MCP servers, and optionally a `bin/` directory into a single installable directory. In this repo, plugins live under `plugins/<name>/`, each with its own `apm.yml` + `.apm/{skills,agents,hooks,...}` — this is the authoring source of truth for the plugin's content (ADR-0015). Two categories of tracked output are compiled from that source, never hand-edited: `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` (Claude Code) and `.github/plugin/plugin.json` (Copilot CLI) via `apm pack`/`apm compile`; and, alongside them, a flat `agents/`, `skills/`, `commands/`, `instructions/`, `extensions/` directory mirror at the plugin root plus a merged hooks file at `hooks/hooks.json`, generated by `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` — Claude Code's and Copilot's installers convention-scan only these flat paths (`hooks/hooks.json` is the convention path for hooks specifically; a root-level `hooks.json` is scanned by nothing and is deleted as stale by a sync — see ADR-0017's 2026-08-14 amendment) and have no awareness of `.apm/` nesting at all, so this mirror is what actually makes `.apm/` content discoverable at install time (ADR-0017). Plugins are copied to a cache on install — they cannot reference files outside their own directory. Install a plugin with `claude plugin install <name>@<marketplace>`, or consume it as an apm dependency (see "apm-consumed install").
+The generated flat `skills/`, `agents/`, `commands/`, `instructions/`, `extensions/` directories and
+merged `hooks/hooks.json` at a plugin root — also called the flat mirror — compiled from that
+plugin's `.apm/` tree so hosts that convention-scan those paths discover the content (ADR-0017).
+_Avoid_: generated copy, duplicate tree
 
-### Plugin marketplace
+**Output profile**:
-A Git repository with a `marketplace.json` manifest listing installable plugins. No backend, registry, or SaaS required — the Git repo is the marketplace. This repo is the `holocron` marketplace. The manifest at `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (read by both Claude Code and Copilot CLI) is **compiled output** of `apm pack`, generated from the root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace:` block (owner, build/output config, versioning strategy, and the `packages:` list of installable plugins) — it is not hand-edited. See ADR-0015. `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` is Copilot CLI's legacy manifest path; apm has no output profile for it (only `claude` and `codex`, and `codex`'s is a differently-shaped file at `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`), so `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` keeps it byte-identical to `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, checked at pre-push. Each listed package's `source:` still points at that plugin's own `plugins/<name>/` root, not at an `apm pack` build artifact — which is why that root also carries the flat `agents/`/`skills/`/`commands/`/`hooks/hooks.json` content mirror described under "Plugin" (ADR-0017): without it, an install from this marketplace finds a valid manifest but no discoverable content.
+An `apm pack` target format for a generated *marketplace* manifest; apm has `claude`
+(`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`) and `codex` (the differently-shaped
+`.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`), and none for `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` (Copilot CLI's
+legacy path), which a sync script mirrors instead. Mechanics: `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
+_Avoid_: build target, export format
 
-### apm-consumed install
+**Plugin marketplace**:
-How this repo installs its own plugins, as of 2026-08-14: not `claude plugin install <name>@holocron`, but six `dependencies.apm` entries in the root `apm.yml`, each a `git:`/`path:` object against the holocron remote, deployed by `apm install` into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`. Project scope only — apm installs nothing at user scope, so the switch is contained to this repo and any other repo opts in by declaring its own dependencies. The git+path object form is deliberate over the shorter `<name>@holocron` marketplace alias: an alias must first be registered with `apm marketplace add`, which writes to `~/.apm/marketplaces.json` (user scope, outside the repo), whereas the object form needs nothing beyond the committed manifest and so survives a fresh clone.
+A Git repository carrying a `marketplace.json` manifest that lists installable plugins. There is no
+backend, registry, or SaaS — the Git repo is the marketplace.
+_Avoid_: registry, store, catalogue
 
-Four consequences, each load-bearing:
+**holocron**:
-- **Skills gain an unnamespaced name.** apm deploys plain project skills, so `git:git-commits` also answers to `git-commits`. The `<plugin>:` form has not stopped resolving here: `~/.claude.json` still enables `core`, `git`, `gitea`, `kyberforge`, and `lint` at user scope, which ADR-0018 left in place deliberately — converting them is a separate decision with a blast radius beyond this repo. Until it is taken, every skill is live under two names, which is the same "present twice under two names" outcome ADR-0018's own "Alternatives considered" rejected for *keeping both install paths* — reached here by leaving user scope alone rather than by adopting it as the install model. Write the bare name regardless: apm deploys it, and a repo consuming holocron through apm gets only that form. The namespaced form still resolves wherever holocron is installed natively, so cross-audience skill bodies should use the bare name.
+This repository, in its role as a plugin marketplace and as the remote the six plugin dependencies
-- **apm owns `.claude/settings.json`.** `apm audit --ci` (an `apm-audit-ci` pre-push hook) replays the install into a scratch tree and diffs it against the worktree, so any key apm would not have written is permanent drift. Committed content is exactly `{"hooks": {}}`; repo-owned settings have nowhere to live in that file.
+resolve against.
-- **Install output is gitignored.** `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, and `apm_modules/` are all regenerated by `apm install`. `apm.lock.yaml` and the generated `.mcp.json` are committed. Committing the deployed skills would add a third mirror of the same content to the two ADR-0017 already governs.
+_Avoid_: the marketplace, upstream
-- **Test discovery must skip `apm_modules/`.** It holds a full copy of every plugin, `.bats` files included; both `tests/run-bats.sh` and `tests/run-tests.sh` exclude it.
 
-Dependencies are unpinned against the default branch, matching the `autoUpdate: true` the native marketplace install had. The practical cost is a round trip: an edit to `plugins/<name>/.apm/` is invisible locally until it is pushed and `apm install` re-runs, because the dependency resolves from the remote rather than from the working tree beside it.
+**apm-consumed install**:
+How this repo installs its own plugins as of 2026-08-14 — six `dependencies.apm` entries in the root
+`apm.yml` deployed by `apm install`, rather than `claude plugin install <name>@holocron`. Its
+consequences: ADR-0018.
+_Avoid_: apm install, dependency install
 
-### HITL (human-in-the-loop)
+**Provenance chain**:
-Agent pauses before a consequential action; human approves before execution. Required for irreversible or high-stakes actions (architecture changes, production deployments, security configuration). The agent drafts the change plan and waits — it does not proceed autonomously. Contrast with HOTL.
+The three-stage traceability record linking a skill back to its research inputs: `/research` produces
+topic docs and a `sources.md`; the author skill records which sources informed which files in
+`references/sources.md` and `source_keys` frontmatter; `skill-audit` validates the chain is complete
+and internally consistent.
+_Avoid_: sources, citations, attribution
 
-### HOTL (human-on-the-loop)
+### Governance
-Agent acts; human monitors and can intervene after the fact. Acceptable for low-stakes, bounded, reversible actions where the cost of pausing for approval exceeds the blast radius of an error. The distinction between HITL and HOTL must be explicit and documented — defaulting to HOTL for convenience is not acceptable.
 
-### Sycophancy
+**HITL** (human-in-the-loop):
-The failure mode where RLHF-trained models prioritise approval over accuracy. Treated as a first-class reliability risk: models change correct answers to wrong ones under user pressure in a majority of observed cases, then persist in the wrong answer. Designing against sycophancy is an explicit obligation, not a quality-of-life concern. Countermeasures: explicit pushback resistance instructions, prompting for dissent, cross-validating against independent sources. Never interpret AI agreement as AI accuracy.
+The agent pauses before a consequential action and a human approves before execution. Required for
+irreversible or high-stakes actions — architecture changes, production deployments, security
+configuration.
+_Avoid_: manual approval, gated action
 
-### AGENTS.md
+**HOTL** (human-on-the-loop):
-The provider-agnostic always-on instruction entry point. Two files:
+The agent acts and a human monitors, able to intervene after the fact. Acceptable only for
-- **Repo-level `AGENTS.md`** — instructions for agents working inside this repo (structure, key rules); imported by repo `CLAUDE.md` via `@AGENTS.md`.
+low-stakes, bounded, reversible actions where the cost of pausing exceeds the blast radius of an
-- **Global `core/AGENTS.md`** — Communication and Behavior rules that apply across all projects; deployed to `~/.agents/AGENTS.md`; imported by `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` via `@~/.agents/AGENTS.md`.
+error.
+_Avoid_: autonomous, unsupervised
 
-Contains always-on rules in plain markdown with no provider-specific syntax (no `@import`). Provider-specific files (`CLAUDE.md`) are thin adapters that import the relevant `AGENTS.md` and add only Claude Code-specific syntax. This pattern means a single source of truth can serve multiple providers without duplication. See ADR-0003.
+**Sycophancy**:
+The failure mode where an RLHF-trained model prioritises approval over accuracy — changing a correct
+answer to a wrong one under user pressure, then persisting in the wrong answer. Treated here as a
+first-class reliability risk, not a quality-of-life concern.
+_Avoid_: agreeableness, people-pleasing
 
-### Skill composition
+### Documents
-A skill calling another skill by name to delegate a sub-task. The calling skill focuses on the orchestration decision ("when to do X"); the called skill owns the mechanics ("how to do X"). Established compositions: `grill-me` calls `write-adr` when a decision crystallises; `implement-feature` calls `tdd` as its implementation methodology; `forge` calls `grill-with-docs` to refine intent, classifies the target artifact type (skill / agent / plugin / marketplace entry), then routes to the matching `*-author` skill — which owns its own create/improve logic and, where applicable, its own inline audit closeout (`skill-author` runs `/skill-audit`, `agent-author` runs `kyberforge:agent-audit`, both in the same context as the authoring work). Reserve `forge` for genuinely undecided "which artifact type is this" questions — an already-fully-specified corrective edit (exact file, line, and fix already known) should call the target author skill directly instead (`skill-author`, `apm-workflow`, `agentsmd-author`, etc.); routing a known fix through `forge`'s grill-and-classify layer adds unnecessary indirection and, in practice, has been observed to lose track of hard constraints handed down the chain (e.g. "don't commit yet," "edit in this worktree") because each hop re-derives instructions from a shorter brief. `forge` additionally runs its own independent recheck after a skill/agent route finishes: a clean-context subagent (not forked, no inherited context) re-runs the same audit skill against the finished artifact, as a distinct verification layer from the author skill's inline audit — the two can share blind spots since the inline audit runs in the same context as the work it checks. If the clean audit surfaces any unresolved finding, `forge` loops — re-invoke the author skill to resolve it, re-run the clean audit — until the clean audit comes back with nothing unresolved; only then is the route done. `plugin-author` and `marketplace-author` had no audit counterpart and got no recheck; their terminal check was `claude plugin validate`. Both were deprecated per ADR-0015, superseded by `apm-workflow`, and deleted entirely once issue #90 landed.
 
-### Provider-agnostic issue tracker
+**AGENTS.md**:
-Skills and workflows reference "linked issue" generically rather than a specific provider. Gitea is the canonical issue tracker for this repo (see ADR-0007). "Issue" is the cross-provider term (GitHub, GitLab, Gitea all use it).
+The provider-agnostic always-on instruction file, in plain markdown with no provider-specific syntax
+(ADR-0003). Two exist: repo-level, and the global `core/AGENTS.md` deployed to `~/.agents/AGENTS.md`.
+_Avoid_: instructions file, system prompt
 
-### Provenance chain
+**Thin adapter**:
-The three-stage traceability record linking a skill back to its research inputs: (1) `/research` produces topic docs and a `sources.md` in `plugins/<plugin>/docs/research/docs/<topic>/`; (2) `/skill-author` reads those docs and records which sources informed which skill files in `references/sources.md` (including a `Research doc:` back-pointer to the upstream research file) and `source_keys` frontmatter on `SKILL.md` and `references/*.md`; (3) `skill-audit` validates the chain is complete and internally consistent via `validate-provenance.sh`. A skill with research input but no `references/sources.md`, or with `source_keys` that don't match `references/sources.md` slugs, has a broken provenance chain.
+A provider-specific instruction file (`CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`)
+that imports its `AGENTS.md` and adds only that provider's syntax, carrying no original always-on
+content of its own (ADR-0002, ADR-0003).
+_Avoid_: wrapper, shim, provider file
 
-### Bidirectional reference principle
+**LESSONS.md**:
-Files that reference other files should declare those references explicitly. The referencing file carries the forward reference (e.g. content index in `CLAUDE.md`, `references:` in frontmatter). The referenced file carries a `when:` field describing when it is loaded. Both sides should agree — divergence signals staleness. The reverse map ("what files reference this file?") is derived by a reference scanner script, not maintained manually. This principle applies to instruction files, skills, and workflow documents.
+The long-loop feedback log for patterns observed across sessions, at the repo root.
+_Avoid_: changelog, retro, postmortem
 
-### agentsmd-author / agentsmd-audit
+**Management Application**:
-A skill pair in the `core` plugin for writing, updating, and reviewing a repo's `AGENTS.md` file(s) — the generic open-standard file (see the `AGENTS.md` entry above), including this repo's own. `agentsmd-author` creates/updates AGENTS.md content, supports nested monorepo placement (per the standard's nearest-file-wins precedence), and closes out by invoking `agentsmd-audit` inline. `agentsmd-audit` runs a single combined pass checking three mandatory baselines: secrets/credentials (governance.md hard prohibition — AGENTS.md is committed content), structural completeness (common-sections checklist from the agents.md spec), and accuracy/drift (do referenced commands and paths actually resolve against the repo). `agentsmd-audit` never inspects provider adapter files (see `provider-adapter-author`) — its scope is AGENTS.md content only. Chosen over folding this into `kyberforge` because kyberforge's scope is meta-tooling for the holocron marketplace itself, not generic target-repo documentation; `core` is the intended home for cross-cutting, repo-agnostic utility skills.
+A separate product in a separate repo for browsing, editing, and configuring AI development configs
+through a product UI, with Git as an invisible persistence layer. Repo-agnostic; this repo is its
+canonical default content. Roadmap: `docs/VISION.md`.
+_Avoid_: the UI, the dashboard, the app
 
-### provider-adapter-author
+### Quality
-A companion skill (`core` plugin) that detects a target repo's provider-specific instruction file (`CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`, etc.) and, where it duplicates content AGENTS.md should own, converts it into a thin adapter that imports AGENTS.md — mirroring this repo's own ADR-0002/ADR-0003 two-tier adapter pattern. Self-validates via its own bundled deterministic script (`scripts/validate-adapter.sh`: checks for an import reference, no duplicated headings, size threshold) rather than a separate paired audit skill — the check is mechanical, so a script suffices per governance.md's "prefer deterministic code for repeatable tasks." `agentsmd-author` calls this skill via skill composition when it detects an existing provider file with overlapping content.
 
-### lint plugin
+**Skill composition**:
-A standalone, repo-agnostic plugin (`plugins/lint/`) for configuring and running linters — not scoped to kyberforge's own meta-tooling. First linter is Vale (prose style linting), split into two skills per the git/gitea per-concern pattern: `vale-config` (setup — `.vale.ini`, `StylesPath`, styles) and `vale-run` (invoke Vale, interpret/report findings). A `lint-runner` agent composes these for isolated-context lint sweeps; it is report-only **by instruction, not by capability** — its body states "You never edit files" and "Do not edit, fix, or rewrite any flagged content", but nothing enforces that. It previously carried `tools: Bash, Read, Grep, Glob`, which withheld `Edit` outright; plugin-scope APM agents cannot express a `tools:` field at all (ADR-0016 — `apm compile` copies frontmatter verbatim to both Claude Code and Copilot, whose `tools:` vocabularies are incompatible, so a value correct for one harness is wrong for the other), so `plugins/lint/.apm/agents/lint-runner.agent.md` now declares only `name`/`description`/`source_keys` and inherits every tool, `Edit` included. ADR-0016 accepted this loss of enforcement knowingly; the restriction survives as prose the agent is expected to follow. Vale's research docs (`docs/research/docs/vale/`) moved from `plugins/kyberforge/` to `plugins/lint/` to keep the provenance chain same-plugin.
+A skill calling another skill by name to delegate a sub-task — the caller owns the orchestration
+decision ("when to do X"), the callee owns the mechanics ("how to do X").
+_Avoid_: chaining, nesting, sub-skill
 
-### Vale audit prefilter (skill-audit / agent-audit)
+**Vale audit prefilter**:
-Wiring Vale as a deterministic prefilter for `skill-audit`/`agent-audit`'s Description dimension (ADR motivation: issue #84) is repo-specific, not part of the generic `lint` plugin, so it doesn't live in `plugins/lint/` — but per ADR-0014 it also doesn't live at the repo root anymore. Two copies live inside `plugins/kyberforge/`, one per skill, since a plugin's cache-install only copies each skill's own files (no cross-skill sharing): `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/agent-audit/assets/vale/` is canonical (`.vale.ini` plus a custom `Kyberforge` style covering description-opener banning ("This skill/agent..."), vague-capability wording ("helps with", "utilize", ...), and generic "see references/ for details" padding — and a `KyberforgeCopilot` style scoped only to `.agent.md` files for the Copilot-only "Use proactively has no effect" check), and `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-audit/assets/vale/` is a smaller duplicate (`Kyberforge` only, scoped to `SKILL.md`) kept in sync by `scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh` (pre-push). A root-level `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` exposes both copies (plus `skill-size-check`) so any external repo can enforce the same rules via `repo: <this-repo-url>, rev: <tag>` in its own `.pre-commit-config.yaml` — pre-commit clones the pinned rev into its own cache, independent of whether Claude Code or the `kyberforge` plugin is installed at all, and the same mechanism covers CI (`pre-commit run --all-files`). This repo's own `vale-audit-prefilter-skill`/`-agent` pre-commit hooks consume the identical plugin-bundled copies via `repo: local` (not a third root copy, and not a pinned self-reference — a pinned self-reference would lint working-tree edits against the last tagged release rather than the change being made). Every rule is `level: error` and every alert is a FAIL — no ignorable tier, same as shellcheck, the test suite, and conventional-pre-commit. Graded severities do not work here: Vale's exit code keys on `error` alerts alone, so `warning`/`suggestion` rules exit 0 and pre-commit swallows the output of a passing hook, leaving them invisible and blocking nothing. `MinAlertLevel` and `--minAlertLevel` are correspondingly absent from `.vale.ini` and the hook, being no-ops under this model. Vale covers the pattern-matchable sub-checks named in issue #84 (imperative opener, vague filler, `Use proactively`, generic reference-pointer padding) plus, per ADR-0013, one body-wide prose-pattern check ("There is/are" sentence openers) — everything else about body discipline (defaults-vs-menus, why-rationale, non-pattern-matchable judgment calls), near-miss exclusion strength, and control calibration stays LLM judgment.
+The deterministic Vale pass that runs ahead of `skill-audit`/`agent-audit`'s Description dimension,
+so LLM judgment is spent only on what a pattern cannot catch. Mechanics: `docs/spec/gates.md`.
+_Avoid_: linting, style check
 
-Both skills' Step 1, and the `vale-audit-prefilter-skill`/`-agent` pre-commit hooks, call each copy's own `scripts/vale-wrap.sh` rather than `vale` directly — a workaround for a confirmed Vale 3.15.2 limitation (see `vale-config`'s Gotchas): `text.frontmatter.description` silently stops matching on most — not all — multi-line descriptions. Verified by reproduction, not assumed: `>` folded scalars, plain (unquoted) continuation lines, and single- or double-quoted multi-line scalars all yield 0 alerts and exit 0 on a deliberately-bad fixture, while a `|` literal block spanning the same 2+ lines lints normally (alerts fire, exit 1). The wrapper flattens those three broken forms to one physical line in a scratch copy (padding with blank lines so every other line number is unchanged) before handing off to real `vale`; `|` literal blocks and single-line descriptions pass through untouched, already linting correctly. The plain and quoted forms previously passed silently — unflattened and unmatched — so a bad description in either sailed through the prefilter. Handed no `--config` at all, the wrapper falls back to its own sibling `assets/vale/.vale.ini`, located from `${BASH_SOURCE[0]}` rather than from the cwd — which is why both manifests' `entry:` is now the bare script path with no argument after it. pre-commit prefixes only `entry[0]` with the hook-repo clone path (`cmd = (prefix.path(cmd[0]), *cmd[1:])`), so every later argument resolves against the *consuming* repo's root: a `--config` in `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` pointed at a path no consumer has and hard-failed every external run with `E100 [--config] Runtime error`. `.pre-commit-config.yaml` drops the argument too, deliberately keeping the two entries identical — the local `repo: local` hook resolved its `--config` correctly only because the consuming repo *was* this repo, and that divergence is why three review rounds exercised a path no external consumer takes and missed the defect. An explicit `--config` still wins, in all three argv forms (`--config X`, `--config=/abs`, `--config=rel`), and a relative one still resolves against the caller's cwd, matching bare `vale`, not the repo root. Both audit skills' Step 1 now passes no `--config` either: it resolves the script relative to the skill's own directory so the call works from an installed plugin cache, but a relative `--config` alongside it would still resolve against the cwd, yielding `E100 Runtime error ... does not exist` and exit 2 — which both skills' fallback misreads as "vale unavailable" and silently downgrades to full LLM judgment. `tests/test-vale-wrap.sh` regression-tests this against skill-audit's copy specifically (its fixtures are all `SKILL.md`-shaped, and only skill-audit's `.vale.ini` has that glob section). Each `.vale.ini`'s section globs are path-agnostic (`[**/SKILL.md]` for skill-audit's copy; `[**/agents/*.md]`/`[**/*.agent.md]` for agent-audit's) and do no scoping on their own: Vale's `*` crosses `/`. Scoping comes from each pre-commit hook's own `files:` regex and from the audit skills passing one explicit file per invocation. The two manifests scope differently on purpose: this repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` pins its own layout — `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` for `-skill`, `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/agents/[^/]+\.agent\.md$` for `-agent` — while the shipped `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` stays layout-agnostic for external consumers whose skills live anywhere, using `(^|/)SKILL\.md$` and `(^|/)agents/[^/]+\.md$|\.agent\.md$`. Both manifests split the prefilter into two hooks precisely because one combined hook pointed at only one copy would silently 0-file-skip the other file type. A `SKILL.md` outside `plugins/` (e.g. project-scope `.claude/skills/foo/SKILL.md`) still matches `[**/SKILL.md]` and gets linted normally — the globs constrain filename shape, not location. Vale reports 0 files only when the path it is handed matches no glob section at all: a differently-named file, or a directory argument holding nothing that matches. That run prints `✔ 0 errors ... in 0 files.` and exits 0, indistinguishable from a clean pass, so both audits treat a 0-file Vale run as NOT RUN and fall back to full LLM judgment.
+**Authoring root**:
+The directory a gate resolves against — the nearest ancestor of the file being checked holding
+`plugins/*/.apm/skills` or `plugins/*/.apm/agents`, falling back to the nearest ancestor holding
+`.git`. The walk: `docs/spec/gates.md`.
+_Avoid_: repo root, project root
 
-This scope expands per ADR-0013: one cherry-picked low-noise `write-good`/`alex` rule landed in `styles/Kyberforge`, `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` (22 held-out hits, both in-corpus hits clean rewrites, zero suppressions). A second, `Kyberforge.VagueQualifier`, was cherry-picked and then deleted: 2 hits across the skill/agent corpus as it stood at the time of that measurement (2026-08-08, before the `.apm/` restructure), one marginal and one an unfixable false positive (`caveman/SKILL.md` quotes `of course` as an example of filler — a mention, not a use) that forced the repo's only Vale suppression comments. A third, `Kyberforge.CompositionNote`, landed with ADR-0020 and bans architecture and composition prose from a description; it is `level: error` like the rest, and it currently fires 10 times across `gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs` and `gitea-workflow`, so `pre-commit run --all-files` is red on prose as well as on size until issue #99 lands. Also new is a sibling pre-commit hook, `skill-size-check` (`scripts/skill-size-check.sh`), which carries **two independent gate families that must not be conflated** (see "Skill context contract"). The agentskills.io spec backstop is `MAX_LINES=500` and `MAX_WORDS=2770`, both inclusive and both counting the **whole file including frontmatter** (2,770 is a word-count proxy for the 5,000-token limit, calibrated to the densest prose measured in this repo — 1.81 tokens per word — so even a worst-case `SKILL.md` at the ceiling stays under 5,000 tokens; it is not a percentile of the corpus). ADR-0020 adds a context budget measured differently: description characters 250 SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL, **body-only** words 600 SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL, plus deterministic checks that every boundary routing target resolves, that a body's named `references/<file>.md` all exist, and — SUGGESTION-tier — that a boundary clause is present at all, that `## Gotchas` holds at most five entries, and that it stays under 25% of the body. `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh` and `agent-audit/scripts/validate.sh` hold their own copies of the shared constants and `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh` asserts the copies agree, so a `SKILL.md` can no longer pass its own audit yet be blocked by the commit hook. Agents take the description gates and no body word gate. `python3` **and PyYAML** are hard requirements — the earlier hand-rolled frontmatter fallback is gone, because a fallback that silently mis-parses a scalar shape reports a vacuous pass. Scoped to `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` only, same as `vale-audit-prefilter-skill`, so it never lints `docs/research/examples/` reference skills. It's also exposed in the root-level `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` as `kyberforge-skill-size-check` — it has no external asset dependency, so it needed no relocation, only exposure to external consumers. File scope (`SKILL.md` + agent files) and enforcement model (rules land directly in `styles/Kyberforge`, blocking immediately, no trial tier) stay unchanged; governance.md/CONTROLS.md were evaluated and excluded as rule sources (nothing prose-pattern-matchable to mine). House convention: banned phrasing that must be mentioned rather than used goes in backticks or a fenced code block — Vale skips code spans and fences, so no suppression is needed; inline `<!-- vale Rule = NO -->` (HTML-comment form; the MDX `{/* */}` form does not work in plain Markdown) is the fallback only where backticking is impossible.
+**Near-miss**:
+A query that shares keywords with this skill but needs a different one — and, by extension, the
+sibling that would wrongly answer it; boundary clauses exist to exclude genuine near-misses rather
+than to enumerate siblings. Detail: `skill-audit/references/description-quality.md`.
+_Avoid_: overlap, similar skill
 
-### LESSONS.md
+**Vacuous green**:
-Long-loop feedback log for patterns observed across sessions. Three or more entries on the same pattern graduate to the relevant standing file (e.g. a coding convention, a governance rule). Updated by the session-handoff skill or directly by the human. Lives at the repo root.
+A check that reports success because it measured nothing — zero files scanned, an unparsed value read
+as empty, a conditional branch that never armed.
+_Avoid_: false pass, clean run
+
+**Issue**:
+The cross-provider term for a tracked unit of work. Gitea is this repo's canonical tracker
+(ADR-0007), but skills say "linked issue" generically rather than naming a provider.
+_Avoid_: ticket, card, task
+
+## Relationships
+
+- A **Plugin** bundles one or more **Skills** and agents; a **Plugin marketplace** lists **Plugins**;
+  **holocron** is this repo wearing that hat.
+- Every model-invocable **Skill** pays the **Preload tax**. A **Hand-invoked skill** does not — which
+  is the first question to settle when authoring one.
+- The **Skill context contract** bounds both the **Preload tax** (description) and the body.
+  A **Dispatch body** is how a skill stays inside it; **Delegation discipline** is how an agent does.
+- **AGENTS.md** is the source of always-on rules; a **Thin adapter** imports it and originates
+  nothing.
+- **Skill composition** is the caller/callee split. `forge` routes a genuinely *undecided* artifact
+  type to the matching author skill — an already-specified fix (file, line, and change known) calls
+  that author skill directly, because each routing hop re-derives instructions from a shorter brief
+  and has been observed to drop hard constraints handed down the chain.
+- **HITL** and **HOTL** are exclusive per action class, and the choice must be explicit and
+  documented. **Sycophancy** is why HOTL is not the safe default.
+- A **Skill** built on research carries a **Provenance chain**; `skill-audit` fails it when broken.
+- **LESSONS.md** feeds the standing files: three or more entries on one pattern graduate the pattern
+  into the relevant standing document.
+
+## Example dialogue
+
+> **Dev:** "This one only fires when someone types the slash command. Does its description still need
+> trigger words?"
+> **Maintainer:** "No — that's a **hand-invoked skill**. The host withholds it from the model-visible
+> listing, so it pays no **preload tax** at all and the description is human-facing text."
+> **Dev:** "Then the body can be as long as it needs to be?"
+> **Maintainer:** "Different budget. The **skill context contract** gates the body whether or not the
+> skill is model-invoked — the description competes with every other skill's description, the body
+> competes with the caller's live conversation. Four mutually exclusive flows means a **dispatch
+> body**: table in `SKILL.md`, one `references/` file per flow."
+> **Dev:** "And if I split it into an agent instead?"
+> **Maintainer:** "Then you're in **delegation discipline** territory. An agent has no `references/`
+> to disclose to, so the failure mode flips — it stops being length and starts being restatement of
+> a procedure some skill already owns."
+
+## Flagged ambiguities
+
+- "skill" was used for both the authored `SKILL.md` under `plugins/<name>/.apm/skills/` and the
+  deployed copy under `.claude/skills/` — resolved: the authoring source is the **Skill**; the
+  deployed copy is gitignored `apm install` output and is never edited.
+- Skills can answer to two names, bare (`gitea-prs`) and namespaced (`gitea:gitea-prs`), depending on
+  whether a native install exists at user scope alongside the apm one (ADR-0018) — resolved: write
+  the bare name, which is the only form `apm install` produces.
+- "context" means both the model's live token window (the **Preload tax** sense) and the bounded
+  domain this file describes — resolved: unqualified "context" in this repo means the token window.
+- "audit" was used for both an author skill's inline closeout and `forge`'s independent
+  clean-context recheck — resolved: these are two distinct layers, kept separate precisely because
+  an audit running in the same context as the work it checks shares that work's blind spots.

LESSONS.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 # Lessons
 
-Patterns observed during development of this repo. Three or more entries on the same pattern → promote to CONTEXT.md (or the relevant instruction file) as a standing rule.
+Patterns observed during development of this repo. Three or more entries on the same pattern → promote to `docs/spec/architecture.md` (or the relevant instruction file) as a standing rule.
 
-**Graduation rule:** When three or more entries cover the same pattern, the human reviews and promotes it to the appropriate standing location: `CONTEXT.md` for domain-level principles, `core/instructions/coding.md` for coding conventions, `core/instructions/testing.md` for testing conventions, or `core/instructions/subagent-orchestration.md` for delegation conventions. Those four are the whole set — `core/instructions/` holds `coding.md`, `governance.md`, `subagent-orchestration.md` and `testing.md`, and nothing else. Git conventions have no standing file of their own: promote them to `core/instructions/coding.md`, or create a new instruction file deliberately rather than assuming one exists. The graduated entries are marked `[graduated → target file]` rather than deleted (audit trail).
+**Graduation rule:** When three or more entries cover the same pattern, the human reviews and promotes it to the appropriate standing location: `docs/spec/architecture.md` for structural and domain-level principles — `CONTEXT.md` is not a destination, its `## Principles` section was deleted and what was there now sits under that file's "AGENTS.md pattern" and "Reference conventions" headings — `core/instructions/coding.md` for coding conventions, `core/instructions/testing.md` for testing conventions, or `core/instructions/subagent-orchestration.md` for delegation conventions. Those four are the whole set — `core/instructions/` holds `coding.md`, `governance.md`, `subagent-orchestration.md` and `testing.md`, and nothing else. Git conventions have no standing file of their own: promote them to `core/instructions/coding.md`, or create a new instruction file deliberately rather than assuming one exists. The graduated entries are marked `[graduated → target file]` rather than deleted (audit trail).
 
 **Who writes here:** The session-handoff skill (Chunk 3) prompts LESSONS.md extraction before closing a session. The human may also write directly.
 
@@ -10,254 +10,122 @@ Patterns observed during development of this repo. Three or more entries on the
 
 ---
 
-## 2026-05-17 — Workflow documents should prescribe sub-agent usage, not just allow it
-
-When writing workflow documents (like `docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md`), the natural tendency is to describe steps at a high level and leave sub-agent usage as an implementation detail. But if the workflow doesn't explicitly prescribe "spawn a sub-agent here," practitioners default to doing everything in the main context — accumulating token cost and losing the isolation benefit. Fix: make sub-agent usage a named step in the workflow, specifying what the agent receives, what it returns, and why it's isolated. This makes the workflow reproducible rather than dependent on the practitioner remembering to use agents.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Conflict check before synthesis grill, not during
-
-When combining upstream sources into a skill, conflicts with governing documents (AI constitution, factory principles) tend to surface in the middle of the synthesis grill — disrupting the combining discussion and requiring context switches. Fix: run a dedicated conflict-check step before the grill. A sub-agent reads the governing documents, checks the upstream content against them, and returns a numbered list of tensions. The grill then starts with those items as explicit agenda points, making it faster and more systematic. An empty conflict list is also valuable — it confirms the upstreams are clean before co-writing begins.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Cross-references to "produced by issue N" rot before the session ends
-
-Issue files frequently referenced "the workflow defined in `docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md` (produced by issue 0016)." Within the same session that closes issue 0016, that parenthetical is already stale — the document exists and is the authoritative reference. Fix: reference the document path directly, not the issue that produced it. The git history records the producing issue; cross-references should point to the artifact that persists.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — "Read at session start" is a behavioral hope, not a guarantee
-
-The repo CLAUDE.md instructs agents to read CONTEXT.md at session start, but agents skip this in practice — defaulting to reading only what's directly relevant to the immediate prompt (e.g. the skills folder). The governance.md works because `@import` is technically enforced by Claude Code. Fix: (1) add `@CONTEXT.md` to repo CLAUDE.md using `@import` to make it always-loaded; (2) add a "Key decisions" section to CONTEXT.md with one-line resolved-ADR summaries so locked choices are always in context.
-
-**Status (2026-08-14): neither part landed.** Root `CLAUDE.md` imports `@AGENTS.md` only — no `@CONTEXT.md` — and `CONTEXT.md` has no "Key decisions" section. The behavioral hope this entry diagnosed is still the only mechanism in place: `AGENTS.md` carries the line "Read CONTEXT.md at the start of every session in this repo," which is loaded but is itself an instruction, not an import. The proposal above is open work, not a record of a completed change.
-
 ## 2026-05-17 — Instruction rules lose to RLHF defaults without specificity
 
-Behavioral tests (2026-05-17) showed three communication/behavior rules failing: exploratory question format (gave verbose multi-bullet answer instead of 2-3 sentences), file edit intent (asked for clarification instead of stating intent and proceeding), and push confirmation (went straight to tool call instead of asking first). All three rules are present in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` as one-liner statements. The RLHF-trained defaults (thorough answers, risk-averse clarification seeking, fast execution) consistently outcompete thin rules. Fix: rewrite failing rules with specificity, a counter-example, and a boundary statement — not just a single-line imperative.
+Behavioral tests found three one-line rules in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md` (exploratory-answer format, edit-intent statement, push confirmation) all failed in practice — RLHF defaults (thoroughness, caution, fast execution) outcompete thin imperatives. Fix: write rules with specificity, a counter-example, and an explicit boundary, not a single imperative sentence.
 
 ## 2026-05-17 — Secrets rule gap: response text not covered
 
-The secrets prohibition in `core/instructions/governance.md` fired correctly when asked to write a password to a file, but the agent then reproduced the literal credential in its response text (in a shell `export` example). The rule was interpreted as "don't write to files" not "don't output at all." Fix: the rule needs to explicitly state "never produce the credential value in any output" and give an example showing placeholder usage (`export DB_PASSWORD='<your-password>'`).
+The governance.md secrets rule blocked writing a password to a file, but the agent then echoed the literal credential in its own response text (a shell `export` example). The rule read as "don't write files," not "don't output at all." Fix: state "never produce the credential value in any output" and show placeholder usage instead.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Synthesis grill and SKILL.md co-write are two separate conversations
-
-The synthesis grill (step 4) answers schema-level questions: how to combine upstreams, which eval schema to use, merge behaviour. Step 5b is a different conversation: how upstream content maps to each SKILL.md body section, what options each section had, and which was chosen. Collapsing them — writing the SKILL.md immediately after the grill without a per-section walk-through — means the human never sees the upstream options for the body and has no opportunity to redirect before the file is written. Fix: step 5b is now a named gate in the workflow. Walk through every body section one at a time, cite the upstream source, present alternatives, get confirmation. Only then write. Applies to both hand-written (bootstrap) and write-skill-produced skills.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Skill-calls-skill composition must be a named process step
-
-When a skill invokes another skill as part of its work (e.g. write-skill invoking write-eval to produce the eval), that call must be a numbered step in the Process section — not left as an implicit external workflow step. If it isn't named, practitioners either forget it or do it manually outside the skill, breaking the composition chain. The user caught this during the write-skill co-write; it was absent from the process despite being in the workflow doc. Fix: when designing any skill that composes another, list each composed call explicitly as a numbered step with a "do not mark complete until X exists" constraint.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — AGPL-3.0 repos appear prominently in community skill search results
-
-When searching GitHub for agent skill upstreams, AGPL-3.0 repos (e.g. dceoy/speckit-agent-skills) appear alongside permissive-licensed ones without obvious visual distinction. AGPL imposes copyleft obligations on adopted content. Always run a licence check (GitHub API `/license` endpoint) before extracting any content from a new upstream. An AGPL finding is a hard exclude — record the repo, SHA, and licence in source review notes so future sessions don't re-review it.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — Trigger description gate is not satisfied by embedding it in the section walk-through
-
-The per-skill workflow (and write-skill's own process step 4) requires testing the trigger description against 3 cases — explicit, implicit, negative — as a standalone gate with explicit PASS/FAIL markers before any body content is written. During write-docs (issue 0018 phase 2), the trigger description was included in the section walk-through (step 5b) rather than tested first as a named gate. The gate never had explicit pass/fail output, which means neither the human nor the agent confirmed the trigger was sound before section content was written. Fix: treat the trigger test as a numbered standalone step with per-case PASS/FAIL output before step 5b begins. A section walk-through that happens to include the description field is not a substitute.
-
-## 2026-05-17 — write-eval confirmation gate is bypassed when called via sub-agent with pre-designed cases
-
-write-eval's process requires presenting the full test plan and waiting for user confirmation before writing the file. When write-eval is invoked by passing pre-designed test cases directly to a write sub-agent, this gate is skipped — the file is written before the user sees the plan. This happened during write-docs (issue 0018 phase 2). Fix: when orchestrating write-eval as part of a larger workflow, split into two steps: (1) sub-agent proposes test cases and returns to the main conversation; (2) after user confirmation, sub-agent writes the file. Or: design cases in the main conversation, present them to the user, then spawn the write agent. The plan-then-write separation is the gate — collapsing it into a single sub-agent call silently removes it.
-
-## 2026-05-18 — Skill body sections were cargo-culted, not spec-defined
-
-The write-skill authoring standard required 8 body sections including Role and When/When not. These were assumed to be agentskills.io requirements. Checking the actual spec revealed the body has no format restrictions at all — recommended sections are step-by-step instructions, examples, and edge cases. Role and When/When not were added by convention without verifying the standard. Fix: before encoding any requirement as part of an authoring standard, check the upstream spec directly. The agentskills.io spec also confirmed that negative triggers belong in the description field — not in a separate body section — which eliminates a persistent duplication pattern across all skills.
-
-## 2026-05-18 — Provenance fields in frontmatter are loaded on every skill scan
-
-Fields like `source:`, `references:`, `version:`, `updated:`, and `when:` in SKILL.md frontmatter are loaded at agent startup alongside `name` and `description` for every installed skill. None of these are used for routing or runtime execution — they are audit and upgrade-cycle records. Loading them at startup violates progressive disclosure and wastes tokens proportional to the number of installed skills. Fix: move all non-routing frontmatter to a separate `META.md` file in the skill directory. Frontmatter keeps only `name`, `description`, `metadata.category`, and `allowed-tools` (when applicable) — the four fields the spec actually uses for routing and discovery.
-
-## 2026-05-18 — Copy-fill is more deterministic than generate for structured skill artifacts
-
-When a skill produces a structured artifact like SKILL.md, the natural approach is to generate it from internalized rules in the Process section. But this means section structure is only as reliable as the agent's instruction-following under token pressure. Copy-fill (copy the template to the target path, then fill in content) separates structure from content: the template mechanically enforces section order and presence, freeing the Process section to focus only on sequencing constraints (what order to decide things) rather than also policing structure. Side benefit: the template is a human-usable artifact that can be adopted independently of the skill. Fix applied in write-skill refactor: SKILL-TEMPLATE.md and META-TEMPLATE.md are the authoritative structure sources; the Process section no longer contains a body structure constraint — the template handles it.
 
 ## 2026-05-17 — HITL gap: agent delegates confirmation to permission system
 
-The agent-level HITL rule ("require explicit confirmation before irreversible shared-state operations") is being bypassed: the agent calls the tool and lets the permission dialog catch it. This means the rule is not firing in agent reasoning — it's the permission system acting as a safety net. If a user selects "don't ask again," the net disappears. Fix: the HITL rule needs to be framed as "do not call the tool" rather than "ask before proceeding" — the agent must ask first, then act only after explicit confirmation.
+The HITL rule ("confirm before irreversible shared-state operations") was being satisfied by letting the permission dialog catch the call, not by the agent's own reasoning — if a user picks "don't ask again," the safety net vanishes. Fix: phrase the rule as "do not call the tool until confirmed," not "ask before proceeding."
-
-## 2026-05-26 — META-TEMPLATE uses YAML comments; META.md output retains them
-
-META-TEMPLATE.md uses YAML `#` comments to explain fields inline. SKILL-TEMPLATE.md uses HTML comments inside XML tags, which the agent strips on fill. The structural difference means SKILL.md output is clean but META.md output retains the explanatory `#` lines — an inconsistency. Fix (deferred): restructure META-TEMPLATE.md so all explanatory guidance is prose above the code block (markdown, never copied into the output YAML), and the code block itself uses `<placeholder>` syntax with no `#` comment lines. This makes META.md fill behaviour deterministic for the same reason SKILL.md fill is: `<...>` markers are unambiguously replaceable; prose above the block is not part of the template. Do not apply until the human/copy-fill tradeoff is resolved — see 2026-05-26 session discussion.
 
 ## 2026-05-26 — Overlap checks must scan the deployed directory, not just the source repo
 
-`write-a-skill` existed only in `~/.agents/skills/` (installed from a pre-refactor source) and was invisible during a repo-level scan of `.agents/skills/`. Governance reviews and overlap checks that only look at the source repo will miss skills added by install.sh from other sources or prior runs. Fix: overlap checks must scan the deployed `~/.agents/skills/` directory, not just the repo's `.agents/skills/`.
+A skill installed only to `~/.agents/skills/` (not the repo's `.agents/skills/`) was invisible to a repo-level overlap scan. Skills added by `install.sh` or prior runs live in the deployed directory, not just the source. Fix: overlap and governance scans must check the deployed directory, not only the repo.
 
-## 2026-05-26 — `model:` field belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not META.md
+## 2026-05-26 — `model:` field belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not a sidecar file
 
-Claude Code supports `model:` as a provider extension in SKILL.md frontmatter — it overrides the session model for the skill's turn and reverts after. Attempting to put it in META.md was wrong: META.md is provenance/audit metadata, not runtime config. The boundary: if a field affects agent behaviour at invocation time, it belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter; if it serves upgrade reviews and audit trails, it belongs in META.md.
+`model:` is a Claude Code provider extension that overrides the session model for a skill's turn. Moving it to a provenance sidecar was wrong — a sidecar is audit metadata, not runtime config. Rule: if a field affects invocation-time behaviour, it belongs in SKILL.md frontmatter, not a sidecar.
 
 ## 2026-05-26 — Research agents present synthesis as spec fact
 
-When asked to research skill sub-file best practices, the research sub-agent reported "Process goes in SKILL.md. Context goes in reference files" as if it were verbatim from the Claude Code docs or the Agent Skills spec. Checking agentskills.io directly showed the spec says: "There are no format restrictions" on the body. The principle is a reasonable synthesis, not a quoted rule — but it nearly landed in write-skill's constraints as authoritative spec language. Fix: always verify research agent claims against the primary source before encoding them as rules, especially for spec or documentation claims. Plausible synthesis is the hardest fabrication to catch because it's often correct in spirit.
+A research sub-agent reported "Process goes in SKILL.md, context in reference files" as if quoted from the agentskills.io spec; the spec actually says there are no body format restrictions. Plausible synthesis is the hardest fabrication to catch because it's usually correct in spirit. Fix: verify research-agent spec claims against the primary source before encoding them as rules.
 
 ## 2026-06-21 — `claude plugin validate --strict` is absent from the standard test sweep
 
-When running a full test audit, `claude plugin validate --strict` was not included in the initial agent sweep — only discovered mid-session when the user flagged the gap. The command catches warnings that normal mode tolerates (missing `version` fields, non-agent `.md` files in `agents/`) and will cause CI to fail when strict mode is enforced in Chunk 6. Fix: include `claude plugin validate --strict` on all plugin paths and marketplace manifests as a named step in any plugin audit. It belongs in the pre-push hook alongside `check-manifests.sh` — currently only `check-manifests.sh` runs there. See `tests/test-plugin-validate.sh` (pending, Gitea issue #2).
+`claude plugin validate --strict` was left out of the standard plugin audit sweep and only discovered when the user flagged the gap. It catches warnings (missing `version` fields, stray non-agent `.md` files) that will fail CI once strict mode is enforced. Fix: run it on every plugin path and marketplace manifest as a named audit step.
 
 ## 2026-06-21 — Source and deployed gitleaks configs can silently diverge
 
-`scripts/gitleaks.toml` (source, in git, deployed to repo root by `setup-gitleaks.sh`) and `.gitleaks.toml` (deployed root copy, read by the hook, also tracked in git) were found with different allowlist states — someone had updated the deployed file directly without updating the source. Running `setup-gitleaks.sh` again would overwrite the deployed file with the stale source, silently deleting the existing allowlist and re-exposing a known false positive as a blocking pre-commit failure. Fix: treat `scripts/gitleaks.toml` as the single source of truth; never edit `.gitleaks.toml` directly. When making allowlist changes, always update source and deployed copy together in the same commit. Longer-term fix: `setup-gitleaks.sh` should merge rather than overwrite, or detect divergence and warn when `.gitleaks.toml` is tracked in git.
+`scripts/gitleaks.toml` (source) and `.gitleaks.toml` (deployed, hook-read) drifted after someone edited the deployed copy directly; rerunning `setup-gitleaks.sh` would have overwritten it, silently deleting the allowlist. Fix: treat the source as sole truth, never hand-edit the deployed copy, and update both together in the same commit.
 
-## 2026-06-21 — `shellcheck` without `-x` blocks pre-commit on any script using `source` (LEGACY SHELL HOOKS)
+## 2026-06-21 — `shellcheck` without `-x` blocks pre-commit on scripts using `source` (historical)
 
-**Status:** Historical. Shell-hook-based pre-commit was replaced by pre-commit framework (Chunk 5, .pre-commit-config.yaml). Modern repos no longer affected. Documented for reference when supporting legacy repos.
+Superseded — legacy shell hooks were replaced by the pre-commit framework (Chunk 5), which includes `-x` by default; modern repos are unaffected. Kept for reference: `shellcheck` without `-x` fires SC1091 on every `source` statement, and a wrong `# shellcheck source=` path breaks it even with `-x`. Verify with `shellcheck -x <file>` when supporting legacy scripts.
-
-The pre-commit hook ran `shellcheck "$f"` without `-x`. Without `-x`, shellcheck fires SC1091 for every `source` statement and exits non-zero, blocking the commit. This was a latent bug in legacy shell hooks, only triggered when `install.sh` (which sources `deploy-manifest.sh`) was staged for the first time. Compounding it: the `# shellcheck source=` directive in `install.sh` pointed to `deploy-manifest.sh` (bare filename, resolved from CWD = repo root) rather than `scripts/deploy-manifest.sh` (correct repo-root-relative path), so even with `-x` the file wasn't found on the first attempt.
-
-**Lesson for future work:** When writing a `source=` directive, use a path that resolves correctly from the CWD where shellcheck will be invoked — verify with `shellcheck -x <file>` before committing. Pre-commit framework hooks include `-x` by default in the ecosystem's shellcheck integration.
 
 ## 2026-06-22 — Plugin cache isolation rules out shared/ directories between skills
 
-When two skills in the same plugin share a resource (e.g. validate.sh), the instinct is to put it in a shared/ directory and reference it with a relative path. This breaks silently after install: plugins are copied to a cache, and `../` paths across skill directories stop resolving. The correct pattern is duplication with clear ownership — one skill owns the canonical copy and the other delegates to it via a skill invocation (e.g. /skill-audit) rather than a file path. If delegation is not possible, duplicate the file and note the owning skill in a comment.
+Skills sharing a resource (e.g. `validate.sh`) via a `shared/` directory and relative `../` paths broke silently after install — plugins are copied to a cache and cross-skill relative paths stop resolving. Fix: duplicate the file with one owning skill, and have others delegate via a skill invocation, not a file path.
 
-## 2026-06-22 — Qualitative rubrics should be grounded in upstream spec docs, not derived from in-repo usage
+## 2026-06-22 — Qualitative rubrics should be grounded in upstream spec docs, not in-repo usage
 
-When skill-audit's qualitative checks for description quality and body discipline were first written, they were derived from skill-write's own authoring conventions — a circular dependency. Any drift in skill-write's conventions would silently propagate into the audit criteria. Fix: extract condensed reference files directly from the upstream spec (agentskills.io) and load them conditionally from the audit skill. The rubric is then grounded in the authoritative source and independent of in-repo convention drift.
+`skill-audit`'s description and body-discipline rubrics were derived from `skill-write`'s own conventions — circular, so drift in one silently propagated to the other. Fix: extract condensed reference files directly from the upstream spec (agentskills.io) into the audit skill, so the rubric is independent of in-repo convention drift.
 
 ## 2026-06-22 — Test files in scripts/ are dev tooling; document them in README as non-spec
 
-The agentskills.io spec defines scripts/ for bundled executable scripts — it says nothing about test infrastructure. Bats test files placed in scripts/ (or scripts/tests/) are invisible to auditors following the spec and create silent README drift if not documented. Fix: place test files directly in scripts/ (no subdirectory), add a row to the README file table for each with a "dev tooling, not shipped with the plugin" note, and don't nest them in a tests/ subdirectory since that creates a non-spec directory structure.
+The agentskills.io spec defines `scripts/` for bundled executables, not test infrastructure — bats files placed there are invisible to spec-following auditors and cause README drift. Fix: place test files directly in `scripts/` (no subdirectory), and add a README row noting each as "dev tooling, not shipped."
 
 ## 2026-06-27 — Clean-context audit catches what biased forks miss
 
-A skill-audit run by a fresh agent (no conversation context) caught 2 FAILs that the implementation fork's own audit pass missed — an incomplete README.md file table and `references/sources.md` paths invalid in the plugin cache. Forks that built the artifact are biased toward their own output: they know what was intended and fill in gaps silently. A fresh agent has no such priors and audits what is actually written. Fix: always run a clean-context audit as a named final step after implementation forks complete. It is not redundant with the in-process audit — it is a different check.
+A fresh-context skill-audit caught two FAILs (an incomplete README table, invalid cache paths) that the implementing fork's own audit missed — the fork that built the artifact knows what was intended and fills gaps silently. Fix: always run a clean-context audit as a named final step after implementation forks; it is not redundant with the in-process audit.
 
 ## 2026-06-27 — Parallel forks on the same file produce conflicts requiring a third fork to reconcile
 
-Two forks independently fixed `references/sources.md` with different approaches — one added a header comment, the other replaced the paths with relative references. Both were plausible; neither read the spec first. Reconciling required a third fork to read the authoritative source and revert to the correct format (repo-root-relative, per skill-author Step 5). Fix: when multiple forks are in scope for the same file, either (a) scope them to non-overlapping files explicitly, or (b) sequence them rather than parallelise. If a fix is spec-governed, always read the spec before applying it — the "obvious" fix is wrong as often as it is right.
+Two forks independently "fixed" `references/sources.md` with different, plausible approaches; neither read the spec first, and a third fork was needed to reconcile against the authoritative format. Fix: scope forks to non-overlapping files or sequence them. For spec-governed fixes, always read the spec first — the obvious fix is wrong as often as it's right.
 
 ## 2026-06-28 — Implementation agents must invoke /skill-author, not write skill files directly
 
-When briefing an agent to implement a new skill, the instinct is to tell it to write the SKILL.md and supporting files directly. This bypasses Step 5 of the skill-author process (provenance), which requires reading all research `sources.md` files and recording every `extracted` slug in META.md. The `validate-provenance.sh` script catches the gap — but only after the commit, requiring a fix round. This pattern recurred twice in one session (plugin-author and marketplace-author initial implementation, then again in the first round of fix agents). Fix: briefs for implementation agents must explicitly say "invoke `/skill-author` (read and follow `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/SKILL.md`)" — not "write the skill files." Invoking the skill is the only reliable way to ensure all process gates, including provenance, run.
+Briefing an agent to "write the SKILL.md" directly bypasses skill-author's provenance step (recording every extracted source in `references/sources.md`), caught only by `validate-provenance.sh` after the commit — this recurred twice in one session. Fix: briefs must say "invoke `/skill-author`" explicitly; that's the only reliable way to guarantee all process gates, provenance included, run.
 
 ## 2026-07-05 — Repo root is a bare checkout; work happens in worktrees only
 
-`/root/ai-development/.git` has `core.bare = true` — the root directory itself has no working tree. Running plain `git status`, `git commit`, or editing tracked files at the root fails (`fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree`) or silently produces edits git can never see or commit — not discoverable until the error is hit, or worse, missed entirely. All real work — including one-line docs fixes — requires `git worktree add <path> -b <branch> origin/main` first. Fresh worktrees also don't have submodules (`tests/bats`, `docs/wiki`, etc.) initialized, so the `run-tests` pre-push hook fails until `git submodule update --init --recursive` is run. Fix: before any edit/commit in this repo, confirm a working tree exists (`git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree`); if not, create a worktree first, and initialize submodules before attempting to push.
+This repo's root `.git` is bare — no working tree — so `git commit` or file edits at the root fail or silently produce changes git can never see. Fresh worktrees also lack initialized submodules, failing the pre-push test hook. Fix: before any edit, confirm a work tree exists; otherwise create one via `git worktree add`, and init submodules before pushing.
 
 ## 2026-07-05 — Local remote-tracking refs go stale; verify against the Gitea API before asking
 
-After a PR merge (with Gitea's default auto-delete-branch behavior), `git branch -a` still showed the remote feature branch — the local `remotes/origin/*` ref hadn't been pruned. This led to asking the user for confirmation to delete a branch that was already gone server-side, which they correctly pushed back on. Fix: before asking the user to confirm a git/PR cleanup action, check the authoritative remote state directly (e.g. `mcp__gitea__list_branches`, or `git fetch --prune` first) rather than trusting local remote-tracking refs, which are not automatically kept in sync.
+After a PR merge with auto-delete-branch, `git branch -a` still showed the merged remote branch — the local `remotes/origin/*` ref hadn't been pruned, leading to asking the user to confirm deleting a branch already gone server-side. Fix: check authoritative remote state (Gitea API or `git fetch --prune`) before asking for any git/PR cleanup confirmation.
 
 ## 2026-05-18 — Planning meta-commentary does not belong in deployed artifacts
 
-During write-skill refactor, an "open thread" note (about a deferred research step) was written directly into the SKILL.md Process section. The user caught it. The rule it violated: a deployed artifact (SKILL.md, a runtime file loaded by agents) must not contain planning meta-commentary — deferred items, open threads, and implementation notes belong in the issue file, which is the planning artifact. The skill body should contain only content relevant to runtime execution. If a decision is deferred, record it in the issue and leave no trace in the skill. The distinction: issue = planning record; skill = executable instruction.
+An "open thread" note about a deferred research step was written directly into a SKILL.md Process section during a refactor. Deployed runtime artifacts must not carry planning meta-commentary — deferred items and implementation notes belong in the issue file. Rule: issue = planning record; skill = executable instruction only.
 
-## 2026-08-08 — A clean linter result can mean "nothing was checked"
+## 2026-08-08 — A clean linter result can mean "nothing was checked" [graduated → core/instructions/testing.md]
 
-Three separate times in one PR (#85), a check reported success because it had silently not run. (1) Vale's `text.frontmatter.description` scope stops matching once the value is a multi-line YAML block scalar — the style most skills here use — so a repo-wide sweep returned 0 alerts across 49 files and was read as a clean repo. (2) Five of six rules were `level: warning`, but Vale's exit code keys on `error` alone and pre-commit hides output from passing hooks, so those rules were invisible and blocked nothing for two review rounds while the ADR described them as "enforcing immediately." (3) `.vale.ini`'s globs matched no file outside `plugins/`, so Vale printed "0 files" and exited 0, which both audit skills read as "no findings" and used to skip their own judgment passes. Each time the green result was worse than no check at all, because it was cited as positive evidence of cleanliness. Fix: for any new check, prove it fails before trusting that it passes — run it against a deliberately-bad fixture, confirm the failure, then run the real corpus. Where a check can scan zero inputs, assert on the input count, not just the exit code. **[graduated → core/instructions/testing.md]** (4th instance below, kept for audit trail).
+Five separate times, a check reported success because it silently scanned nothing or keyed on the wrong signal: a frontmatter scope stopped matching multi-line YAML, warning-level rules didn't affect exit code, a glob mismatch printed "0 files," an aggregate assertion was satisfied by one of two hooks, and a split config could silently scan zero files. Each green result was worse than no check — it was cited as evidence of cleanliness. Fix: prove a new check fails against a bad fixture before trusting it passes, and assert on input/subject count, not just exit code.
-
-**5th instance (2026-08-09, PR #85 round 6):** `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` asserted `grep -c "VagueWording" >= 2` across the *combined* output of both shipped Vale hooks, and the SKILL.md fixture alone raised two alerts — so one working hook satisfied the threshold and the agent hook could be disabled entirely (glob retargeted to match nothing) while the suite still reported `3 passed` under the message "both hooks flatten and flag". The `Skipped` guard did not catch it: the hook still *matched* the file, Vale simply linted nothing, reported `0 errors in 1 file`, and exited 0, which pre-commit renders as `Passed`. The general shape: **an assertion that aggregates over N subjects proves nothing about any individual subject** — a total is satisfiable by a proper subset. Fix: attribute each signal to its source before asserting (alerts are now filed by path, with a distinct trigger token per fixture so one hook's alert cannot be credited to another), and assert per subject. Corollary technique, now standing practice for any check whose failure mode is silence: run the mutation sweep in *reverse* as well — neuter each assertion in turn and confirm exactly one test case fails. Applied to `check-vale-style-sync.sh` it exposed two assertions bound to no failing case at all, one of them masked by a stronger check that ran first.
-
-**4th instance (2026-08-09, ADR-0014):** splitting the single root `.vale.ini` into two skill-scoped copies (skill-audit: `SKILL.md` only; agent-audit: agent files only) meant a single retargeted pre-commit hook pointed at agent-audit's copy alone would have silently scanned 0 `SKILL.md` files and exited 0 — caught only because the full corpus was dry-run against both the old and new config and the outputs diffed before the old config was deleted, not because any test asserted on file counts. Standing practice going forward: when a Vale (or any linter) config that serves multiple file-glob scopes is split or moved, dry-run the full corpus through both the old and new config and diff the outputs before removing the superseded source — a hook silently scanning 0 files looks identical to a clean pass.
 
 ## 2026-08-08 — One signal, two consumers, no named distinction
 
-Vale's output fed two consumers with different contracts: the audit skills read severity *strings* to grade a report (`error`→FAIL, `warning`→SUGGESTION), while the pre-commit hook read the process *exit code* to allow or block a commit. Severities were tuned for the first consumer; the second silently inherited whatever exit code that produced, which was always 0. CONTEXT.md described both as a single mechanism under one heading, which is precisely why the divergence went unnoticed — there was no vocabulary in which "the gate" and "the prefilter" were different things that could disagree. Fix: when one output feeds two consumers, name them separately in the domain language and state each contract explicitly. If they cannot be given independent contracts, collapse them into one — which is what happened here: every rule became `level: error`, so the gate and the audit now share a single verdict with nothing to keep in sync.
+Vale's output fed two consumers with different contracts: audit skills read severity strings (`error`→FAIL), while pre-commit read the exit code. Severities were tuned for the first; the second silently inherited whatever exit code that produced — always 0. Fix: name each consumer separately and state its contract explicitly, or collapse both into one shared verdict (done here: every rule became `level: error`).
 
 ## 2026-08-08 — Measure a rule's false-positive rate at the severity you will ship it at
 
-`Kyberforge.VagueQualifier` was cherry-picked from `write-good` after being trialled as "low-noise against this repo's corpus" — but the trial ran at `level: warning`, where a false positive costs nothing because nobody ever sees it. Shipped at `error`, the same false positive costs a blocked commit and a permanent suppression comment. Re-measured at the severity it actually shipped at, the rule scored one marginal true positive and one unfixable false positive across 41 files (`caveman/SKILL.md` *quotes* filler words as its subject matter — a mention, not a use), and was deleted. Fix: trial conditions must match shipping conditions. A noise measurement taken where false positives are free does not transfer to a context where they are expensive, and "low-noise" is not a property of a rule alone — it is a property of the rule at a severity.
+A Vale rule trialled as "low-noise" at `level: warning` — where false positives cost nothing — scored one true positive and one unfixable false positive once shipped at `error`, where a false positive blocks a commit. It was deleted. Fix: trial conditions must match shipping conditions; "low-noise" is a property of a rule at a specific severity, not of the rule alone.
 
 ## 2026-08-09 — Exercising a config's "local" mode proves nothing about the mode that ships
 
-The root `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` shipped Vale hooks whose `entry:` carried a `--config <repo-relative-path>` argument. pre-commit prefixes only `entry[0]` with the hook-repo clone path (`cmd = (prefix.path(cmd[0]), *cmd[1:])`), so every later argument resolves against the *consuming* repo's root: each external consumer hard-failed with `E100 [--config] Runtime error ... does not exist`, and two of the three hooks ADR-0014 promised were unusable. The defect survived three review rounds of PR #85 and a green `pre-commit run --all-files` every time, because this repo consumes the same hooks through `repo: local`, where the clone prefix, the cwd, and the repo root are one directory — the byte-identical `entry:` string worked locally for a reason that exists only locally. Nothing under `tests/` exercised the manifest as a hook repo at all. The sharp part: the local run was not weaker evidence of the same thing, it was evidence of a different thing, and the two were indistinguishable by reading either file. Fix: when a config has a local mode whose resolution semantics differ from the shipped mode, test the shipped mode against a real consumer — `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` stands up a `file://` clone of this repo and runs the hooks from it — and then delete the divergence rather than living with it: `vale-wrap.sh` now self-locates its config from `${BASH_SOURCE[0]}`, and the local and shipped `entry:` lines are identical, so the local run no longer exercises a path no consumer takes.
+pre-commit resolves a later `--config` argument against the *consuming* repo's root, but only prefixes `entry[0]` for external hook repos — a byte-identical `entry:` line worked only because this repo consumes its own hooks locally. Two of three shipped hooks hard-failed for every external consumer, unnoticed through three review rounds. Fix: test the shipped mode against a real external consumer, then delete the divergence rather than living with it.
 
 ## 2026-08-09 — Deleting a token from a shared artifact breaks whatever parses it, silently
 
-Dropping the `--config` argument from `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` was the right fix, but `scripts/check-release-needed.sh` derived its release-relevant path list by scanning those same `entry:` lines for `--config` and taking the target's `dirname` — that parse was the only thing giving the bundled `.vale.ini` and its sibling `styles/` tree release coverage. With the token gone the loop simply never fired: no error, no failing test, no warning, just a path list that shrank from six entries to four and lost both `assets/vale/` trees. Consequence: a change to a Vale *rule* could land on `main` without demanding a release tag, leaving external consumers pinned to an old `rev:` with stale rules — the exact drift the gate exists to prevent. It surfaced only because the agent making the change reported it as a suspected side effect of its own edit, and was confirmed by diffing the derived path list before and after. Fix: before removing a token from an artifact more than one script reads, grep for everything that *parses* the artifact, not just everything that consumes its documented purpose. The smell to watch for is a loop that builds a list, where an empty or short list is indistinguishable from a correct one — assert on the expected members, so a derivation whose input vanished fails loudly instead of quietly covering less.
+Removing a `--config` argument from `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` was the right fix, but `check-release-needed.sh` derived its release-relevant path list by parsing that same token — with it gone, the derivation silently shrank with no error. Fix: before removing a token from an artifact more than one script reads, grep for everything that *parses* it, and assert on expected list members.
 
 ## 2026-08-09 — A documented impossibility is a claim, not a constraint
 
-`vale-wrap.sh` flattens multi-line YAML `description:` scalars so Vale's `text.frontmatter.description` scope keeps matching. Its last-resort branch rewrote ASCII `'` to U+2019, justified at the emission site and in review as "the single combination no YAML scalar can carry verbatim" — an accepted-by-design residual, documented and test-covered, which is exactly why nobody retested it. The claim was false: a `|-` literal block with one indented content line carries `'`, `"`, `\` and `: ` verbatim, keeps the scope alive, and the wrapper's own header docstring already said literal blocks were unaffected. The cost of the unexamined claim was a silent underlint on 12 of 54 in-scope files — any rule whose token contained an apostrophe simply never fired, and the covering test (case 20) pinned only "the scope stays alive", so it passed either way. Fix: when a residual is accepted because something is "impossible", write down the specific claim in a falsifiable form and test *that*, not the workaround built on top of it. The tell here was that the residual and its justification were documented in the same breath by the same author — documentation records a belief, and a belief adjacent to a workaround is the one most worth attacking. Related: an assertion written to cover an accepted residual tends to assert the residual's *presence* rather than the behaviour it costs; case 20b asserted the scope survived flattening, never that a rule matching the rewritten characters still fired.
+A wrapper script's last-resort character rewrite was justified as "the one case no YAML scalar can carry verbatim" — untested because it seemed obviously true. It was false: a literal block scalar carries the exact characters in question, silently underlinting 12 of 54 files. Fix: when a residual is accepted as "impossible," write the claim in falsifiable form and test that claim directly, not the workaround built on it.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — A fix handed down with authority is the least-reviewed code in the change
 
-Across one review round, four fixes specified by the orchestrating reviewer were wrong, and every one would have shipped a guard that looked correct and caught nothing — the same defect class the guard was written to close. `nproc([[:space:]]|$)` does not match `$(nproc)`, the only spelling that occurs in real code. `grep -E ... | grep -Evq ...` under `set -o pipefail` returns 141 because `-q` exits on first match and SIGPIPEs the upstream, and 141 as an `if` condition reads as "no findings" — worse, it is *size-dependent*, so on the real 4-line `.vale.ini` the broken form behaves correctly and only fails once the input grows. `FUNCNAME` and `BASH_ARGC` were proposed as never-empty shell arrays to exempt from an unguarded-expansion scan; both are empty in reachable states (outside a function; `BASH_ARGC` measured 1 at top level and 0 inside a function), so exempting them suppresses a real bash 3.2 abort. `sed 's/#.*//'` as a comment-stripper truncates at the `#` in `${var#prefix}` — a form this repo actually uses at `check-manifests.sh:58` — reintroducing the exact blind spot being fixed. Each was caught only because the implementing agent re-derived the fix and measured, rather than applying what it was told; each had survived being written down confidently in a numbered finding with a reproduction attached. The asymmetry is the point: a finding arrives with evidence and gets scrutinised, while the fix beside it arrives with the same authority and gets implemented. Fix: state a proposed fix as a hypothesis with its own falsifiable check, and require the implementer to verify the fix mechanism independently of the defect reproduction — the two are different claims. The tell is a fix whose correctness depends on a regex boundary, a shell exit-status rule, or an "always/never" property of a builtin: measure it at the size, scope, and spelling it will actually meet, because the small case and the shipped case can disagree.
+Four fixes specified by an orchestrating reviewer were all wrong — a regex that didn't match the real code shape, a pipefail exit code misread as "no findings," two "never-empty" shell arrays that were empty in reachable states, and a comment-stripping `sed` that truncated `${var#prefix}`. Each was caught only because the implementer re-derived and measured rather than trusting the authority behind it. Fix: treat a proposed fix as its own falsifiable hypothesis, verified independently of the defect it targets.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — Every assertion needs a revert it provably fails against [graduation candidate]
 
-Mutation testing a review round's own fixes found repeatedly that a passing test was pinning nothing. Deleting `sync_dir`'s stale-directory wipe, its check-mode stale branch, or three of five `MIRROR_DIRS` entries each left the suite at 18/18 green; so did replacing the hooks trailing-newline normalisation with plain `cp`. A pair of concurrency assertions written to guard a reentrancy defect caught it 0 times in 10 runs against the deliberately broken script — and one of them was structurally incapable of ever catching it, because the broken code wrote to the system temp dir while the assertion inspected `$TMPDIR`. A fixture-leak fix ran green with and without the fix, verified only by external observation. Two manifest fixtures passed with the canonicalisation they claimed to cover deleted, rescued by an unrelated name-matching axis. In each case the test named the right behaviour in its description and asserted something adjacent to it. The cheap discipline that finds all of these: for every assertion, construct the revert it is supposed to catch and confirm it fails — and when an assertion survives every revert you can think of, that is not reassurance, it is the finding (one test only revealed itself as decoration once a sixth, differently-targeted revert was built for it). Fix: treat "which revert does this fail against?" as a required answer at the time an assertion is written, and record it where the assertion lives, since a test's own description is exactly the artifact that made the gap invisible.
+Mutation testing repeatedly found tests passing green with the behaviour they claimed to guard deleted — a stale-directory wipe, a reentrancy guard, a fixture-leak fix, canonicalization logic. Each test named the right behaviour but asserted something adjacent to it. Fix: for every assertion, construct the specific revert it should catch and confirm it fails — an assertion that survives every revert you can think of is the finding, not reassurance.
-
-Graduation candidate: this overlaps 2026-08-09's "an assertion written to cover an accepted residual tends to assert the residual's presence rather than the behaviour it costs" and the same date's "assert on the expected members, so a derivation whose input vanished fails loudly instead of quietly covering less." Three entries circling one pattern — human review for promotion to `core/instructions/testing.md`.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — Vale's `existence` extension concatenates `raw:` entries, it does not alternate them
 
-A new `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` rule was first written with seven `raw:` entries, one per banned
+A new rule with seven `raw:` entries (one per banned phrase) loaded without error and matched zero of 43 files — indistinguishable from a clean corpus. `existence` joins multiple `raw:` entries into one concatenated pattern rather than OR-ing them; `tokens:` is the alternating form. Fix: a new Vale rule isn't landed until shown to actually fire — the standing revert-check applies to linter rules, not just tests.
-phrasing. Vale loaded it without a diagnostic and it matched **zero of 43 files** — an outcome
-indistinguishable from a clean corpus, and the exact shape of 2026-08-08's "a clean linter result can
-mean nothing was checked". The cause is that `existence` joins multiple `raw:` entries into one
-pattern rather than OR-ing them, so the rule was searching for all seven phrases concatenated. Every
-pre-existing rule in this style has exactly one `raw:` entry, so nothing in the repo demonstrated the
-difference, and the multi-entry form looks natural beside them. `tokens:` is the alternated form,
-which is why `VagueWording` uses it. Fix: a new Vale rule is not landed until it has been shown to
-*fire* — the standing revert-check applies to linter rules as much as to tests, and the revert here
-is the broken multi-`raw:` form, which `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` now fails against.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — Un-anchoring a description rule to reach mid-sentence text is unshippable
 
-Widening `DescriptionOpener` to catch `gitea-workflow`'s mid-description "This is the human-facing
+Widening a description-opener rule to also catch mid-sentence text looked like a one-character change, but `scope: text.frontmatter.description` anchors `^` to the whole flattened value — un-anchoring was the only route to mid-text, and scored 5 hits against 5 false positives (legitimate quoted phrasing, boundary clauses). Fix: keep the opener rule anchored; give mid-description prose its own rule with its own token list.
-entry point…" looked like a one-character change. Both that skill and `gitea-labels-milestones`
-*open* with "Use when…" and satisfy the opener rule; the offending clause sits at character 377 and
-300 of the folded value respectively, so the rule was never violated and never silently passed — it
-simply had no jurisdiction, which is a different defect and takes a different fix.
-Under `scope: text.frontmatter.description`, `^`
-anchors to the start of the whole description value — and `vale-wrap.sh` has already flattened that
-value to one physical line, so `(?m)` changes nothing. Un-anchoring is therefore the only route to
-mid-description text, and measured across the corpus it scores 5 hits and 5 false positives: skills
-legitimately quote user phrasings (`says "audit this skill"`) and write boundary clauses (`do not use
-this skill to manage label definitions`). That is the `Kyberforge.VagueQualifier` deletion repeating.
-Fix: keep the opener rule opener-anchored and give mid-description prose its own rule with its own
-token list. A rule's scope anchor is part of its contract, not an implementation detail to relax when
-a new case does not fit.
 
 ## 2026-08-14 — A formatter in the commit path manufactures drift on a file with a clean git diff
 
-`apm audit --ci` failed on `.claude/settings.json` while `git diff` on that file was empty — the worst
+`apm audit --ci` failed on `.claude/settings.json` with an empty `git diff` — `pretty-format-json --autofix` silently re-sorts JSON keys, and this generated file was missing from its exclude list, so every commit re-sorted apm's insertion-ordered output before apm compared against it. Separately, a defect introduced 3 hours earlier on the same branch was first mis-described as "pre-existing," an unverified claim about history. Fix: add tool-owned paths to every autofixing hook's exclude the moment ownership is declared, and verify "pre-existing" claims with `git log -S` or `git branch --contains` before writing them down.
-possible pairing of signals, because the file matched HEAD exactly and every instinct says "nothing
-changed here". The content was identical to apm's output to the byte; only the JSON key order
-differed. `pretty-format-json --autofix` sorts object keys unless `--no-sort-keys` is passed, and its
-`exclude:` listed fifteen generated manifests but not this file, so from the commit that first wrote
-a hook entry there onward, apm's insertion-ordered output was silently re-sorted on the way in. apm
-then replayed the install, produced its own order, and reported drift against a file no human had
-touched.
-
-The provenance matters as much as the mechanism, and the first account of this entry got it wrong in
-both directions. `git log --format='%h %ad %s' --date=iso` puts the introducing commit `2e395a4` at
-2026-08-14 18:47 and the fix `7607522` at 21:54 — roughly three hours, not "weeks". And `2e395a4` is
-the **first commit of the `refactor/trim-skills-agents-context` branch**, eleven minutes after the
-base merge `f9b919d`; `git branch -a --contains 2e395a4` returns only that branch and its own
-`remotes/origin/` tracking copy — two lines naming one branch, and `main` is not among them. So
-this was not a latent defect inherited from `main`, it was manufactured inside the same PR that
-diagnosed it, and the fixing commit's own message calling it "pre-existing … red at HEAD before
-ADR-0020 work began" is the mis-attribution rather than the record. Two cheap commands would have
-settled it before either sentence was written.
-
-Three general points. First, a tool-owned generated file that passes through an autofixing formatter
-is drifted by construction, and the diff that would reveal it never appears in `git diff` — it only
-exists between the formatter's input and its output, which nothing stores. Second, the fix is
-self-undoing unless the exclude lands in the same commit: correcting the file alone means the hook
-re-breaks it as it is staged. Third — the one this entry had to learn twice — "pre-existing" is a
-claim about history, and history is queryable; a defect found while working on a branch feels
-inherited, and the feeling is not evidence. A three-hour-old self-inflicted bug and a months-old
-inherited one call for different responses, and writing the wrong one down converts a process failure
-into a story about someone else's neglect. Fix: when a tool declares ownership of a path, add that
-path to every autofixing hook's `exclude` at the moment ownership is declared, not when the drift is
-noticed — and before describing any defect as pre-existing, run `git log -S` or
-`git branch --contains` on the commit that introduced it. This repo gates marketplace-mirror,
-plugin-content and vale-style drift deterministically and has no equivalent gate asserting tool-owned
-paths stay out of formatter scope — `.claude/settings.json` was the sixteenth exclude and nothing
-prevents a seventeenth.
 
 ## 2026-08-16 — A rule reversed inside a retrofit leaves no trace unless someone writes it down
 
-`skill-author/SKILL.md:204` on `main` said "Keep reference chains one level deep — a reference file
+A retrofit replaced "keep reference chains one level deep" with "two hops, never three" — the opposite rule, needed because the new dispatch pattern requires `SKILL.md` → `improve.md` → `retrofit.md`. The ADR never mentioned chain depth, so the reversal was carried entirely by the diff with no sign a contradicting rule ever existed. Fix: when a change inverts a standing rule, record the inversion where the rule's rationale lives, or it reads as forgotten rather than overturned.
-that references another reference file is rarely loaded correctly." The ADR-0020 retrofit replaced it
-with "Two hops from `SKILL.md`, never three" in `references/create.md` and `references/retrofit.md`,
-which permits exactly the chain the old rule banned. The looser rule is the right one and the
-retrofit could not have shipped without it: dispatch pushes each flow into its own file, so the
-shipped structure is `SKILL.md` → `improve.md` → `retrofit.md`, and a one-level ceiling would have
-made the mandatory dispatch pattern illegal. But ADR-0020 says nothing about chain depth, so the
-reversal was carried entirely by the diff — the new text asserts the new rule with no sign that a
-contradicting rule ever existed, and a reader who remembers the old one has no way to tell whether it
-was overturned or overlooked. Fix: when a change inverts a standing authoring rule rather than
-tightening or restating it, record the inversion where the rule's rationale lives — the ADR if the
-ADR is the reason, here otherwise. A rule that quietly flips is indistinguishable from a rule that
-was forgotten, and the second reading is the one that gets it re-added later.

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# holocron
+
+The global AI development configuration repository — the authoritative source for agent definitions, skills, workflows, and prompts across all projects. Built as a homelab tool intended to scale to professional environments.
+
+Content ships as six installable plugins, each an apm (Agent Package Manager) package. This repo consumes its own plugins through apm, so the working copy runs the same released content every other consumer gets.
+
+## Repo layout
+
+| Path | What it holds |
+| --- | --- |
+| `plugins/` | Six apm packages — `bin`, `core`, `git`, `gitea`, `kyberforge`, `lint` — each carrying skills, and where relevant agents, hooks, MCP servers, and bundled assets |
+| `providers/claude-code/` | Claude Code adapter, deployed to `~/.claude/` via `scripts/install.sh` |
+| `core/` | Provider-agnostic always-on content — `core/AGENTS.md` and `core/instructions/` |
+| `docs/` | Specs (`docs/spec/`), architectural decisions (`docs/adr/`), governance, research, and notes |
+| `scripts/` | Install, sync, and check scripts used by the git hooks |
+| `tests/` | `run-tests.sh`, `run-bats.sh`, the `test-*.sh` suites, and the bats submodules |
+
+The six plugins:
+
+- **kyberforge** — skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace
+- **git** — conventional commits, branches, history, submodules, worktrees, remotes, pre-commit hook authoring and running (`pc-author` / `pc-run`), and an interactive router (`git-workflow`)
+- **gitea** — issues, pull requests, labels, milestones, releases, branches, files, and an interactive router (`gitea-workflow`)
+- **core** — authoring and auditing a repo's `AGENTS.md` and the provider adapter files that defer to it
+- **lint** — configuring and running linters
+- **bin** — cross-cutting workflow skills not yet split into a focused plugin: research, documentation, TDD, prototyping, triage, diagnosis, architecture review, requirement grilling, compressed output (`caveman`), and re-orienting mid-task (`zoom-out`)
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+Install all of these before setting up. Each one is a hard dependency of a git hook or a script — several fail with an unhelpful "command not found" if missing.
+
+| Tool | Why | Install |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `apm` CLI | Four pre-push hooks shell out to it (`apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, and `check-plugin-content-sync` via `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`) | The `apm-install` skill, or `curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix \| sh`. Verify with `apm --version` |
+| `jq` | Required by `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, pre-push | Your package manager |
+| `python3` + PyYAML | Required by `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` (the `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook), which reads folded YAML frontmatter | `python3` is usually present — pre-commit is itself a Python application. `pip install pyyaml` if the hook reports PyYAML missing |
+| `vale` | Required by the `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` / `-agent` pre-commit hooks and the `check-vale-style-sync` pre-push hook | `brew install vale` (macOS), `snap install vale` (Linux), `choco install vale` (Windows), or https://vale.sh/docs/vale-cli/installation/ |
+| `claude` CLI | Required by the `validate-plugins` and `validate-marketplace` pre-push hooks | Claude Code |
+
+Two notes worth reading before you skip one:
+
+- **PyYAML is a hard requirement, not an optional accelerator.** The hand-rolled fallback frontmatter reader was removed deliberately: a reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file it never measured.
+- **No `vale sync` is needed.** The `Kyberforge` styles are committed under `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/{skill-audit,agent-audit}/assets/vale/styles/`, not downloaded packages (ADR-0014).
+
+## Setup
+
+Run these in order, from the repo root.
+
+```bash
+# 1. Deploy this repo's own skills and agents
+apm install
+
+# 2. Install the git hooks — all three stages
+pre-commit install -t pre-commit -t commit-msg -t pre-push
+```
+
+**`apm install`** deploys the six plugins into `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/`. Both are gitignored install output, *not* authoring source — `plugins/<name>/.apm/` remains the only place to edit. It needs the network, materializes `apm_modules/` (which stays gitignored), and also configures the `obsidian` MCP server into the repo's `.mcp.json`.
+
+**Git hooks** must be wired for **all three stages**. This repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` has no `default_install_hook_types`, so a plain `pre-commit install` silently skips `commit-msg` (Conventional Commits) and `pre-push` (the full gate) — the `-t` flags above are not optional. The `pc-run` skill handles this and the troubleshooting around it, if you would rather not remember the flags.
+
+## Keeping the install current
+
+The six dependencies in root `apm.yml` are unpinned against the default branch, so deployed skills go stale whenever anyone merges. kyberforge ships a `SessionStart` hook that runs `apm outdated` at startup (~0.7s) and, when something is behind, runs `apm update --yes` and asks the host to re-scan skills (~10.4s).
+
+That rewrites `apm.lock.yaml` — an unexplained modification to it after opening a session is expected, not a bug. Commit or discard it deliberately.
+
+Note the difference between the two commands:
+
+- `apm install` deploys from `apm.lock.yaml`. It does **not** pick up remote changes.
+- `apm update` re-resolves refs. This is the command that pulls in a merged `.apm/` edit.
+
+## Running tests
+
+```bash
+bash tests/run-tests.sh              # every test-*.sh script plus the bats suite
+bash tests/run-tests.sh --bats-only  # just bats
+```
+
+The first run auto-initializes the bats submodules; no manual `git submodule update` needed.
+
+A suite that exits 77 because a dependency is missing is reported as SKIPPED and does **not** fail an ad-hoc run. It *does* fail under `--strict` (equivalently `RUN_TESTS_STRICT=1`), which is how the pre-push hook invokes it — at pre-push, a skip means one of the prerequisites above is absent on this machine, and the gate would otherwise report success having run fewer suites than it appears to. The strict failure names each skipped suite and what to install.
+
+## Before pushing
+
+Run the pre-push gate locally in one command:
+
+```bash
+pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files
+```
+
+One caveat: `check-release-needed` is a silent no-op under this invocation. It exits 0 unless
+`PRE_COMMIT_REMOTE_BRANCH` is `refs/heads/main`, and pre-commit exports that only from the real
+pre-push git hook during an actual `git push` — so the hook reports `Passed` having checked nothing.
+Every other pre-push hook does run.
+
+See [`docs/spec/gates.md`](docs/spec/gates.md) for what each hook enforces and why.
+
+**Offline?** Exactly two pre-push hooks need the network, because root `apm.yml`'s marketplace contains one remote package entry that must be resolved with `git ls-remote`:
+
+```bash
+SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push
+```
+
+Skip **only** those two. The remaining pre-push hooks are real local checks and pass offline; adding one of them to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
+
+## Editing plugin content
+
+`plugins/<name>/.apm/` is the only hand-edited source for plugin content — skills, agents, commands, instructions, extensions, and hooks. The flat `plugins/<name>/{skills,agents,commands,instructions,extensions}/` directories, the merged `hooks/hooks.json`, and every `plugin.json` / `marketplace.json` manifest are generated. Nothing labels a generated file as generated, so check the path before you edit; an edit to the mirror is discarded by the next sync and reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook.
+
+Hand-authored material that is *not* an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json` — lives at the plugin **root** and is untouched. Never place such a file inside a mirrored directory: the sync removes the destination before every copy, so it is deleted with no drift report.
+
+Full detail in [`docs/spec/architecture.md`](docs/spec/architecture.md).
+
+## For external consumers
+
+Install a plugin natively from the marketplace manifests:
+
+```bash
+claude plugin install <name>@holocron
+```
+
+Or consume the packages through apm, the way this repo does — declare them as `dependencies.apm` git+path entries against the holocron remote and run `apm install`.
+
+## Where to go next
+
+- [`AGENTS.md`](AGENTS.md) — the rules for AI agents working in this repo
+- [`CONTEXT.md`](CONTEXT.md) — domain language; read at the start of every session here
+- [`docs/spec/architecture.md`](docs/spec/architecture.md) — directory structure, install pipeline, provider model
+- [`docs/spec/gates.md`](docs/spec/gates.md) — the enforcement gates in depth
+- [`docs/adr/`](docs/adr/) — architectural decisions; read before proposing structural changes
+- [`docs/VISION.md`](docs/VISION.md) — where this is going
+- [`LESSONS.md`](LESSONS.md) — things that went wrong once and should not again

SIMPLIFICATION-AUDIT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+# Simplification audit
+
+Date: 2026-09-10. Read-only analysis; nothing has been changed. Purpose: a hand-off for deciding what to remove, merge, and shrink. Findings are ranked by payoff within each area; effort is S/M/L. Claims were independently re-verified against the repo by a clean reviewer; corrections have been applied.
+
+Assumptions agreed before analysis: anything is on the table, Claude Code and Copilot CLI both stay supported, findings are ranked with effort.
+
+Counting convention: line counts are hand-edited `.apm/` source unless marked "incl. mirror". Every `.apm/` file has a byte-identical generated copy at the plugin root, so plugin cuts count double in the repo total.
+
+## 1. The shape of the problem
+
+| Measure                                                                   | Value                                                                                   |
+| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------| -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Tracked files / lines                                                     | 820 / 102,000                                                                           |
+| Lines in `plugins/`                                                       | 70,600 (69% of repo)                                                                    |
+| Of which the 39 `SKILL.md` files a model actually loads                   | ~2,600 lines (under 4% of plugin lines)                                                 |
+| Generated flat mirror files (byte copies of `.apm/`)                      | 263 files, ~22,000 lines                                                                |
+| `docs/research/` vendored inside plugins                                  | ~19,000 lines, nothing executable reads it                                              |
+| Repo-level `docs/research/` + `docs/notes/`                               | 4,500 lines, 47% of all prose words, 6 of 11 research files linked only from each other |
+| Enforcement: hook entries in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` / pre-push hooks   | 33 / 14                                                                                 |
+| Enforcement: `tests/*.sh` + runners + `scripts/`                          | 12,400 + 475 + 4,500 lines                                                              |
+| Validator scripts inside kyberforge (+ their bats tests)                  | 6,800 + 5,300 lines                                                                     |
+| Preload tax (39 skill names + descriptions)                               | 10,987 chars, ~2,750 tokens per session                                                 |
+| Commits since 2026-05-10 / share touching hook, test, gate, vale, or sync | 447 / ~25%                                                                              |
+
+The pattern across every area is the same: the payload (skill bodies, rules, decisions) is small and the scaffolding around it (mirrors, research dumps, sync gates, tests of tests, justification prose) is 10 to 30 times larger. A quarter of all commits have gone into maintaining the scaffolding.
+
+## 2. Measured baseline: hooks and tests
+
+Measured on this machine, clean tree, all hooks passing. `pre-commit run --all-files` per stage.
+
+| Gate | Wall time |
+|---|---|
+| **Full pre-push stage (everything below, sequential)** | **~5 min 10 s** |
+| `run-tests` (26 bash suites + 351 bats tests) | 276 s |
+| `apm-audit-ci` (7 manifests) | 12.2 s |
+| `validate-plugins` (6 × `claude plugin validate`) | 4.9 s |
+| `check-plugin-content-sync` | 4.5 s |
+| `apm-pack-check-clean` | 3.1 s |
+| Other 9 pre-push hooks combined | 7.6 s |
+| **Full pre-commit stage, all files** | **18.2 s** |
+
+`run-tests` is 90% of the wall time. Every push pays it in full: the runner has no change detection and the config sets `always_run: true`. `apm-audit-ci` is the second-slowest hook; per its own comment block its earlier description overclaimed, and what it verifies today is that seven manifests parse and the lockfile exists.
+
+Where the 276 s goes (each suite run alone, sequential):
+
+| Suite | Time | Note |
+|---|---|---|
+| `test-sync-plugin-content.sh` | 83 s | 14 temp trees, 2 `git init`, repeated `apm pack` |
+| all 351 bats tests (10 files, kyberforge and core validators) | 64 s | mostly `validate.sh` / `validate-provenance.sh` fixtures |
+| `test-adr0020-differential.sh` | 29 s | 12 assertions; re-runs two validators over the live corpus and a fixture tree |
+| `test-check-vale-style-sync.sh` | 25 s | guards a byte-identical copy |
+| `test-vale-wrap.sh` | 14 s | |
+| `test-adr0020-frontmatter.sh` + `-targets.sh` | 25 s | |
+| Remaining 20 suites | 36 s | 12 of them run in under 2 s each |
+
+Five suites account for 215 s of 276 s. Three of those five (sync-plugin-content, vale-style-sync, adr0020-differential) test tooling that findings 2, 7, and 14 propose to delete or shrink, so the fastest path to a quick pre-push is removing the duplication those tests guard rather than optimising the tests.
+
+## 3. Enforcement layer: hooks, tests, scripts
+
+This is the area you named as hardest to understand and slowest. Root cause: most pre-push hooks exist to keep two copies of something in sync, or to re-validate what another hook already validates.
+
+1. **Six hooks validate overlapping sets of the same manifests.** `check-manifests`, `validate-plugins`, `validate-marketplace`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, `apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`. Keep the two `claude plugin validate` hooks plus `apm-pack-check-clean`. ~~Delete `check-manifests` (282 lines + 771 test lines; its `lib/marketplace-plugins.sh` stays because `sync-plugin-content.sh` sources it).~~ `apm-audit-ci` spends 12 s confirming that manifests `apm pack` already parses do parse; drop or keep on that basis. Move the network-dependent `apm-marketplace-check` to a release checklist. Effort S.
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `e647f14` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Deleted the `check-manifests` pre-commit hook entry, `scripts/check-manifests.sh` (282 lines), and `tests/test-check-manifests.sh` (771 lines); kept `scripts/lib/marketplace-plugins.sh`, still sourced by `sync-plugin-content.sh`. Updated the now-stale `check-manifests.sh` mentions in `README.md` and `docs/spec/gates.md` (hook table row and hook counts). The `apm-audit-ci` and `apm-marketplace-check` decisions in this finding remain open — out of scope for this change.
+
+2. **Four "keep two copies in sync" gates: 1,100 script lines + 1,600 test lines.** Each one is a symptom of duplication that could be removed instead of guarded:
+   - `check-vale-style-sync`: 413 lines + 798 test lines guarding a byte-identical 526-line `vale-wrap.sh` and style directory copied between skill-audit and agent-audit. About 350 of its lines run Vale glob probes against the hook file patterns. Disappears if the two audit skills merge (finding 14); the probes belong in `test-vale-wrap.sh`.
+   - `check-scope-walkup-sync`: 365 lines cross-checking four independent ports of the same package-root walk-up. Disappears if the ports share one script or the skills merge.
+   - `check-marketplace-mirror-sync`: guards `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`. The script header calls it Copilot's legacy convention path and says Copilot also accepts the Claude path; the vendored Copilot docs list it as primary. Verify against current Copilot CLI before deleting hook, script, test, and mirror file.
+   - `check-executables-allow-sync`: 474 lines to assert one string equals kyberforge's version. A six-line grep, or drop it (the failure mode is visible and recoverable).
+   Effort S each, M for the walk-up.
+
+3. **Tests of the test harness: 1,090 lines testing 475 lines.** `test-run-tests.sh` and `test-run-bats.sh` defend "green either way" holes that exist only because the runners hand-roll TAP parsing and set-equality checks. Replace both runners with about 40 lines (`bats -r plugins` plus a parallel `find | xargs` over `test-*.sh`) and delete the meta-tests. `lib/batch-run.sh` stays; `sync-plugin-content.sh` sources it. Effort M.
+
+4. [x] ~~**`skill-frontmatter` is a 62-line bash script inlined in YAML** with its own 366-line test. `skill-size-check.sh` already parses the same frontmatter with PyYAML. Fold it in (about 15 Python lines), delete the inline hook, its test, and the 79 lines in `gates.md` arguing for the split. Effort S.~~
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `c8a7c9e` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Added a ~20-line required-frontmatter check (`name`, `description`, `metadata.version` as three-part semver) to `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`, reusing the YAML mapping `description_value()` already parses. Removed the inline `skill-frontmatter` hook (~80 lines) from `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and deleted `tests/test-skill-frontmatter.sh` (366 lines). Removed the 79-line "the other hook on that scope" discussion from `docs/spec/gates.md` and its now-dangling cross-reference, replacing both with a one-line note of the fold; updated the pre-push hook counts there. Updated fixture builders in `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh`, `tests/test-adr0020-body-checks.sh`, `tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh`, `tests/test-adr0020-differential.sh`, and `tests/test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh` to carry valid `metadata.version` so the new check doesn't spuriously fail existing fixtures.
+
+5. **`skill-size-check.sh` has six test files totalling 3,589 lines for one 1,497-line script**, split by ADR section rather than behaviour. `test-adr0020-differential.sh` is 452 lines for 12 assertions. Merge to two files. Effort M.
+
+6. [x] ~~**Prose-grep tests.** `test-governance-layer.sh` and `test-instructions-and-docs.sh` (583 lines) grep markdown for phrases, including a one-shot "issue 0015 refactor incomplete" assertion made permanent and an assertion that `docs/notes/` exists. Delete both.~~ `check-apm-agents-valid.sh` (161 + 264 test lines) is a loop plus fail-closed guards around `validate.sh`; it folds into the merged audit skill's own tests (finding 14). Effort S.
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `5f9f2b3` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Deleted `tests/test-governance-layer.sh` (270 lines) and `tests/test-instructions-and-docs.sh` (313 lines); no other file referenced either. `check-apm-agents-valid.sh` was left untouched — its fate is tied to the separate, out-of-scope skill-merge finding 14.
+
+7. **`check-plugin-content-sync.sh` is 813 lines wrapping `apm pack`, with a 1,291-line test.** The mirror itself must stay (Claude Code marketplace installs need flat directories), and the script does real work a bare `git diff` would lose: it strips `tests/` from the mirror, regenerates both `plugin.json` files with `mcpServers` reinjected, and packs into a scratch copy so `--check` never mutates. Even so, 2,100 lines for that is disproportionate; target a third. Effort M.
+
+8. **`docs/spec/gates.md` (1,048 lines) is roughly 15% "what is enforced" and 85% post-mortems** of defects already fixed and pinned by tests. The 60-line hook table is the useful part. Target 200 lines. The same applies to the 106 comment lines in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` and to `scripts/`, where 8 of 15 files are 40 to 60% comments. Effort M.
+
+**Proposed target.** Pre-push 14 hooks to 6: `run-tests`, `validate-plugins`, `validate-marketplace`, `apm-pack-check-clean`, `check-plugin-content-sync`, `check-release-needed`. Pre-commit stays roughly as is minus `skill-frontmatter`, and minus `check-ast` once finding 9 removes the only `.py` files. Tests 26 files to about 10 (12,400 to about 5,000 lines). Keep bats and its three submodules; the 351 bats tests ship inside plugins and are the right tool there. Do not port the bash suites to bats; delete them instead.
+
+## 4. Plugins
+
+The shared pattern: per-skill `README.md` files no model reads, a `docs/research/` dump per plugin, a `sources.md` provenance chain with its own validator, and reference files that restate man pages.
+
+### 4.1 Cross-plugin (apply everywhere)
+
+9. [ ] **Delete `docs/research/` from every plugin (~19,000 lines).** kyberforge's alone is 14,143 lines, 32% of the plugin, and about 8,900 of those are vendored third-party content (Anthropic `skill-creator` including a 1,325-line `viewer.html` and ten `.py` files, obra/superpowers, mattpocock). The rest is copied tool documentation. The gitea references explicitly say the research doc "has a known history of drifting from the deployed server". Every `apm.yml` uses `includes: auto`; whether the directory ships to consumers needs one check. Keep upstream URLs in one line per plugin README; git history keeps the rest. Check obra/superpowers licence if anything is retained. Goes together with finding 11: 32 `sources.md` files carry "Research doc" paths into these directories. Effort S.
+   > **Decision (2026-09-12):** Keep. `docs/research/` is retained on purpose — it's read by agents doing work sourced from those docs. Not proceeding.
+
+10. [x] ~~**Delete per-skill `README.md` and `references/README.md` (48 files, 1,574 lines).** They restate the SKILL.md in narrative form. The pre-commit config itself notes a skill README "is consumer-facing prose that no agent ever loads". Keep one plugin-level README with one line per skill. Requires dropping the README criterion in `skill-audit/references/file-structure.md` and the README step in `new-skill.sh`. Effort S.~~
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `edcc57c` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Deleted the 48 per-skill/reference READMEs plus 2 scaffold templates; dropped the README criterion from `skill-audit`'s `file-structure.md` and `finding-criteria.md` and the README-generation step from `new-skill.sh`; updated `new-skill.bats` to match. Plugin-root READMEs were kept, not part of this finding.
+
+11. **Drop the provenance chain: `sources.md`, `source_keys` frontmatter, `validate-provenance.sh`.** 32 plugin and skill `sources.md` files (about 1,300 lines) plus 9 research indexes, 216 source files with `source_keys`, two copies of the validator (1,198 and 632 lines) with ten checks, and 125 bats tests exist to track which upstream informed which file. Git blame and a URL in the README do the same job. This is more code than the content it tracks. Effort M (touches skill-audit, both validator copies, two repo tests, and every skill's frontmatter).
+
+12. [x] ~~**Strip ADR and changelog narration from model-facing files.** `ADR-0020` is cited in 3 of 7 kyberforge SKILL.md files and 16 references; ADR-0023 is cited inline 21 times in the git plugin. Examples: "was the old house rule and ADR-0020 deleted it", "were removed per ADR-0015 once issue #90 landed", "this file previously recorded `list_issues` as having neither a `type` nor a `milestones` parameter". `skill-author/references/retrofit.md` (197 lines) is a one-time migration guide; it is loaded from `improve.md` and listed in `sources.md`, so remove those in the same change. These belong in git history or the ADR, not in context. Effort S.~~
+   > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `edcc57c` on `docs/simplification-audit`. Historical narration stripped from kyberforge (ADR-0020) and git (ADR-0023) skill content; `retrofit.md` deleted along with its load-step and `sources.md` entries. Caught in review: some `ADR-0023` tags were not narration but the `check-rtk-prefix` hook's required opt-out marker for intentionally-bare git commands — those 12 were restored, not left stripped.
+
+13. [x] ~~**State repeated boilerplate once or delete it.** A near-identical "Resolve owner and repo" block in 5 of 7 gitea skills; 404-masks-403 in 6 files; manual pagination in 7; main/master refusal in 9 git files; the "use the project's domain glossary, respect ADRs" paragraph in 5 bin skills. Three git skills define three different structured-result JSON shapes whose only consumer is `git-orchestrate` (finding 19). Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `6cfc357`. Trimmed each repeated instance in place — same meaning, fewer words — rather than extracting to a shared file (blocked by the one-file-per-skill install constraint, ADR-0014): the "Resolve owner and repo" block across 5 `gitea-*` skills, the 404-masks-403 note across 6 gitea files, the manual-pagination explanation across 8 gitea files, the main/master force-push refusal across 7 git plugin files (some with multiple internal restatements), and the domain-glossary/ADR paragraph across 5 `bin` skills. This was a trim-in-place pass, not a merge: the cross-skill duplication itself remains and is coupled to the (out-of-scope) skill-merge findings 19/20. Left the three git skills' structured-result JSON shapes untouched, as directed. Verified no regressions with `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` (pre/post diff) and `claude plugin validate` on both plugins.
+
+### 4.2 kyberforge (290 files, 44,568 lines incl. mirror; the 7 SKILL.md bodies are 333 lines, under 1%)
+
+14. **Merge `skill-audit` + `agent-audit` into one `audit` skill (removes about 3,300 lines and two pre-push hooks).** `vale-wrap.sh` is byte-identical in both; five Vale rules byte-identical (agent-audit carries one extra, so it is the superset); `validate.sh` shares a 1,061-line boundary-target resolver block that diffs as zero lines; SKILL.md steps 1, 3, 4 and the gotchas are the same text. Each copy is hard-wired to one mode, so the merged script needs a path switch. The duplication exists because a plugin-cache install copies only each skill's own files (the rule ADR-0014 follows), so a script cannot be shared across skills; merging the skills is the only way to remove the copy. Effort M.
+
+15. **Merge `skill-author` + `agent-author` likewise.** `contract.md` shares most of its Description section; `new-skill.sh` and `new-agent.sh` implement the same package-root walk-up with different mode names; step 1 dispatch tables and step 3 gates are near-identical. Keep the agent scope logic (plugin vs project/user) as its own reference. Effort M.
+
+16. **Cut the validators by an order of magnitude.** `validate.sh` is 1,677 lines of bash with embedded Python, ported twice; `skill-size-check.sh` is 1,497. Target about 200 lines total: frontmatter present, size ceilings, boundary targets resolve. The 526-line `vale-wrap.sh` exists to work around folded `>` scalars in descriptions; writing descriptions as `|` literal blocks removes the folding problem, but the wrapper is also the exported hook entry in `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` and carries the NOT RUN guard the audits depend on, so it shrinks rather than disappears. This is where the real complexity lives and is the item most worth discussing. Effort L.
+
+17. **Fold `forge` and `apm-install`.** `forge` is a four-row routing table plus 207 lines of references explaining fork vs inline; it should be 25 lines with no references. `apm-install` (53 lines + 17-line sources) becomes a sixth dispatch row in `apm-workflow`. Effort S.
+
+18. **Delete prose the model already knows.** "Valid characters: lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens"; what pipx does and PEP 668; "code blocks carry a language tag"; "data to stdout, diagnostics to stderr". Ironically `body-discipline.md` instructs auditors not to include "concepts the agent already knows". Effort S.
+
+### 4.3 git and gitea (153 + 93 files, 9,889 + 6,047 lines incl. mirror; source 3,288 + 2,286)
+
+19. **Delete the two router skills and two orchestrate agents (309 lines + 195 reference lines).** No skill invokes them as a step; they appear only in boundary clauses (`AGENTS.md`, `git-worktrees`, `gitea-issues`, `gitea-prs`) and as worked examples in agent-audit references, all of which must change in the same commit or `skill-size-check` fails on the dangling target. Claude Code already routes on descriptions. The chain today is `git-workflow` step 5 invokes `git-orchestrate`, whose step 5 invokes `git-commits`, which runs `rtk git commit`: three hops. Both agents exceed 900 words; ADR-0020 deliberately sets no agent body gate. Effort S.
+
+20. **Collapse git 7 skills to 1; gitea 7 to 2.** Git references are man-page restatement: `git-log-format.md` (242 lines listing `%H`, `%ar`), `conventional-commits-spec.md` (170 lines), `worktrees.md` (178), `merging.md` explaining fast-forward. Roughly 60% of the plugin is generic. The genuinely house-specific content fits in about 150 lines: the `rtk` rule and ADR-0023 exceptions, main/master refusal, `--no-verify`, the `-i --autosquash` 2.39.5 trap, `--force-with-lease --force-if-includes`, bisect exit codes, submodule push ordering, the detached-HEAD worktree trap. Gitea is more legitimately specific (MCP schema quirks: `tree_sha`, `withLines`, silent drops on PR create, `per_page` 20 vs 30, 404 means 403) and splits naturally into `gitea-tracker` (issues, PRs, labels, milestones) and `gitea-repo` (branches, files, releases). Risk: one description must carry all trigger phrases; keep a dispatch table at the top of the body. Keep `pc-author` and `pc-run` (finding 38). Effort M.
+
+21. [x] ~~**Delete `config.example.json` / `.claude/plugins/git/config.json`.** Read by two steps, written by nothing. Default to GitHub Flow with the existing `develop` / `release/*` inference. Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `f5e4d0d`. Deleted `plugins/git/config.example.json` (the runtime `.claude/plugins/git/config.json` was never a tracked file). Removed the config-read step from `git-orchestrate`'s Process and from `git-branches`' Step 1, leaving the existing default-inference logic (GitHub Flow, with Gitflow inferred from a `develop`/`release/*` branch) as the sole path; updated `git-workflow`'s description of the orchestrator's behaviour to match. Dropped the now-dangling `applied_config` field from `git-orchestrate`'s output shape and the `config.example.json` example from `docs/spec/architecture.md`.
+
+### 4.4 bin, core, lint (88 + 49 + 31 files incl. mirror)
+
+22. **bin: strip generic process theatre.** `write-docs` is 109 lines, mostly form-filling sections plus a 15-line source provenance block; its rules fit in 25 lines. `tdd` is about 70% textbook (RED/GREEN diagram, "good tests are integration-style", five thin references restating textbook design advice). `diagnose` 40%, `prototype` 50% (pixel-level UI switcher spec), `grill-with-docs` 35%. Keep the opinionated parts: "no horizontal slicing", "no phase 2 without a loop", `[DEBUG-xxxx]` tags, "never infer the output path", the triage state machine. Effort M.
+
+23. **bin: merge `grill-me` into `grill-with-docs`.** `grill-me` is 16 lines and a subset of the docs flow; `grill-with-docs` creates `CONTEXT.md` when missing, so the merged skill needs a no-write opt-out. `caveman` (50 lines) and `zoom-out` (9) are hand-invoked prompts rather than workflow skills; they are also the repo's `disable-model-invocation` exemplars in `CONTEXT.md`, `contract.md`, ADR-0020, ADR-0021, and `gates.md`, and `install.sh` has no path for `~/.claude/commands/`, so moving them means picking a new exemplar. `improve-codebase-architecture` defines its glossary twice (inline and in `language.md`; the README documents the split as intentional). Effort S.
+
+24. **core: `provider-adapter-author` is a 1,200-line wrapper around one instruction** ("replace duplicated lines with `@AGENTS.md`, keep provider-specific lines"): a 496-line validator with a 519-line bats suite for a check that is a grep. `agentsmd-author` already calls `agentsmd-audit` as mandatory closeout, and both route to `provider-adapter-author` in boundary clauses that must change with it. Target: one `agentsmd` skill with an audit mode, adapter conversion as a step, validator about 40 lines. Needs an ADR-0012 revisit. Effort L.
+
+25. **lint: delete the `lint-runner` agent.** Its body is "call `vale-run`, reformat output", which `--output=JSON` already gives; it exists for backends that do not exist. It is the example boundary clause in three `agent-author` templates and ADR-0016, so those need a new example. About 40% of `vale-config` is install tables and settings lists the model can fetch from vale.sh. Keep the house-verified matrices (`E100`/`E201`, `Packages` below glob, frontmatter, ignore paths). `lint/docs/research/docs/vale/` overlaps the skill's own references by about two thirds. Effort S.
+
+## 5. Prose and docs (9,600 lines, 109,000 words outside plugins)
+
+26. [ ] **Move or delete `docs/research/` and `docs/notes/` (4,500 lines, 47% of prose words).** Six of eleven research files are linked only from each other; they are self-described session audit trails, agendas, and a "temporary build reference". `docs/notes/factory-research-gaps-conflicts.md` says "Status: Superseded"; `factory-integration-decisions.md` says "Complete" and its decisions already live in ADRs, yet `AGENTS.md` tells every session to read it. `archive/team-self-organisation-sprint-brief.md` (3,400 words) is unrelated to this repo. Archive or delete; drop the three `AGENTS.md` pointers. Moving `CONTROLS.md` to `docs/spec/` means updating its literal path in nine or more files including the deployed `governance.md`. Effort S.
+    > **Decision (2026-09-12):** Keep. Same reasoning as finding 9 — these docs are intentional context for sourced work. Not proceeding.
+
+27. **Four governance documents say one thing.** `core/instructions/governance.md` (949 words, always-on), `docs/ai-constitution.md` (2,906), `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` (1,413), `CONTROLS.md` (1,224), with near-identical preambles and, in three of the four, a "what this file does not govern" block pointing at the others. The constitution repeats one of its own principle lead sentences. Keep `governance.md` as the operative file, trimmed to about 50 lines (drop the classification table that repeats the bullets above it, the footer, the non-governance block). Dedupe the constitution by about 20%. Effort M.
+
+28. **ADRs: 2,740 lines, 72% in eight ADRs over 150 lines.** ADR-0020 is 513 lines with a 71-line measurement log as Context; ADR-0017 has 173 lines of amendments against 45 of decision. ADR-0001 is superseded and ADR-0006 moot, both keeping full text below the banner. ADR-0002 is three lines. Truncate superseded ones to the banner, fold amendments into the decision, cap Context at 20 lines, add a 25-line `docs/adr/README.md` index with status. The rules already live in `gates.md`; the ADRs need only decision and consequences. Effort M.
+
+29. **The same facts are stated in full three or four times.** "Edit `.apm/`, never the mirror": README (2 paragraphs), AGENTS.md (2 paragraphs), architecture.md (2 paragraphs plus the lost-README anecdote), ADR-0017. The apm.lock / SessionStart story: README (11 lines), AGENTS.md, ADR-0018, ADR-0019, gates.md. The offline `SKIP=` command and the three-stage install each appear three times. Rule: README has the how-to, AGENTS.md has one-line rules with links, architecture.md has mechanics. Effort S.
+
+30. [x] ~~**`LESSONS.md`: 41 entries, 2 graduated, about 12 stale.** Twelve entries from 2026-05-17 describe a write-skill / write-eval workflow whose skills no longer exist. One entry is open work labelled "Status: neither part landed". The longest eight are 200 to 550-word incident reports. Delete the stale entries, move open work to an issue, cap entries at about 60 words, target 100 lines. Effort S.~~
+    > **Done (2026-09-12):** see commit `629320b` on `docs/simplification-audit`. 255→131 lines, 41→30 entries. Kept 3 of the same-dated entries (RLHF defaults, secrets-rule gap, HITL gap) — judged unrelated to the defunct write-skill/write-eval workflow and still applicable, so 10 deleted rather than 12. The "neither part landed" open-work entry (CONTEXT.md not `@import`ed at session start) was removed rather than filed as an issue — full text preserved in this session's transcript if wanted later.
+
+31. **`CONTEXT.md`: 28 terms, most used only by gates.md, scripts, or tests rather than by skills;** two (Preload tax, Skill context contract) are never used outside `CONTEXT.md` and ADR-0020. The preload-tax entry quotes two dated numbers then says not to quote them. The example dialogue and flagged-ambiguities sections are grill residue. Cut to about 20 one-line terms. Effort S.
+
+32. **Structure is described three ways** (README layout table, architecture.md plugin table, AGENTS.md structure bullets), and `VISION.md` carries a 35-line stack spec for a product that lives in another repo. One layout table in README; architecture.md keeps mechanics only; VISION drops the stack detail. Effort S.
+
+## 6. Distribution, versioning, and session startup
+
+Not covered by the area audits above; found on a final sweep of the root config and install pipeline. The install pipeline itself (`scripts/install.sh` 55 lines, `deploy-manifest.sh` 24, statusline 109) is fine and needs nothing.
+
+33. **Every plugin version lives in four places (five for kyberforge), plus one per skill.** `plugins/<name>/apm.yml`, two generated `plugin.json` files, the root `apm.yml` packages list, the `executables.allow` key (`kyberforge#1.6.2`), and a `metadata.version` in all 39 SKILL.md files (ADR-0022) that nothing consumes and that drifts freely (gitea skills sit at five different values). Repo tags (`v2.0.1`) follow a third scheme that the declared `tagPattern: v{version}` can never match under `per_package` versioning. ADR-0006, ADR-0022, `check-executables-allow-sync`, `skill-frontmatter`, and `apm pack --check-versions` all exist to police this. Proposal: one version per plugin in its `apm.yml`; drop `metadata.version` and ADR-0022; let `apm pack` derive the rest. Effort M.
+
+34. **The SessionStart hook auto-updates the install on every startup.** `check-apm-current.sh` runs `apm outdated` (network, 60 s timeout) and then `apm update --yes` (300 s timeout) at every session start, rewriting `apm.lock.yaml`. That is why the lock file is dirty at the start of this session and why `AGENTS.md` has to explain "commit or discard it deliberately". It is a 60-line script with a 368-line test, an ADR (0019), the `executables.allow` pin, and a sync hook behind it. For a repo that is its own source, the update belongs in `install.sh` or a manual `apm update`, not in session startup. Effort S to remove; the design question is whether auto-update at startup is wanted at all.
+
+35. **Outputs and packages for consumers that do not exist.** The `codex` output profile generates `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (95 lines) although Codex is not a supported consumer. The `mattpocock-skills` remote package entry is the only reason `apm-marketplace-check` needs the network, and its pin is advanced by hand (ADR-0015). The `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` mirror is a legacy path (finding 2). Removing all three leaves one generated marketplace manifest (the per-plugin `plugin.json` pairs remain) and no network-dependent hook. Effort S.
+
+36. **The release-tag mechanism guards an external contract with no known consumer.** `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` exports three hooks for other repos to pin by `rev: <tag>`. `check-release-needed` (242 lines + 442 test), `test-vale-hooks-consumer` (270 lines), ADR-0014, and three tags exist to serve that. If no other repo pins these hooks today, the whole mechanism can be deferred until one does. Effort S.
+
+37. **Two `.mcp.json` files declare an Obsidian vault server over `docs/`** (root and `plugins/bin/`; the other five plugin `.mcp.json` files are empty stubs), while `AGENTS.md` forbids using an external memory system for this repo. If the Obsidian tools are unused, drop both and the `reinject_mcp_servers` explanation in the bin README; the bin `plugin.json` pair regenerates. Effort S.
+
+38. **`pc-author` / `pc-run` (689 lines) carry generic pre-commit documentation.** `hooks-by-language.md` (128 lines) and `failure-patterns.md` (133) restate pre-commit.com. Keep the skills, trim to the house-specific rules. Effort S.
+
+## 7. Suggested order
+
+1. Quick wins, all S, no design decisions needed: findings 9, 10, 26, 30, 31, 29, 12, 13, 1, 6, 4, 35, 37, 38, and the mirror-sync and executables-allow halves of 2. Removes roughly 25,000 to 30,000 lines and 6 hooks.
+2. Structural changes that need a short discussion: 14, 15, 19, 20, 23, 25, 17, 3, 5, 7, 33, 34, 36.
+3. The real complexity: 16 (validators), 11 (provenance), 24 (core), 8 and 28 (gates.md and ADRs).
+
+Findings 9, 10, 11, and 12 are coupled through the provenance validator and the audit criteria; land them together or the audit gates start reporting the removals.
+
+## 8. Questions to settle before starting
+
+- **Native Claude Code marketplace install vs apm-only.** The flat mirror, `check-plugin-content-sync`, and ADR-0017 exist only for native `claude plugin install`. If apm install is the only supported path, the mirror and its 2,100 lines of tooling go away. Which install paths must work for consumers?
+- **Copilot CLI legacy path.** Is `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` still read by any Copilot version you target? If not, finding 2c is a pure delete.
+- **Provenance chain.** Is "which upstream informed this file" a requirement you still want, or was it a governance experiment? Finding 11 hinges on this.
+- **ADR-0012 (three core skills) and the one-script-per-skill install constraint.** The merges in 14, 15, and 24 need the first revisited and are the only way around the second. Are you open to superseding ADR-0012?
+- **Granularity of git/gitea skills.** One `git` skill vs seven trades routing precision for size. Is one broad description acceptable?
+- **Auto-update at session start.** Do you want the install refreshed from the remote every time a session opens (finding 34), or is a manual `apm update` acceptable?
+- **External hook consumers.** Does any other repo pin this repo's `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` by tag today? If not, finding 36 defers the release mechanism entirely.
+- **Obsidian MCP.** Are the Obsidian tools over `docs/` used by anyone? If not, finding 37 is a pure delete.

apm.yml

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 name: holocron
-version: 0.4.2
+version: 0.4.6
 description: AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.
 license: MIT
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ dependencies:
 # after a kyberforge release, check this first.
 executables:
   allow:
-    kyberforge#1.6.0:
+    kyberforge#1.6.2:
       hooks: true
       bin: true
 
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ marketplace:
   # top-level apm.yml description:/version: above are NOT inherited into the
   # compiled output despite being used elsewhere (e.g. by `apm audit`).
   description: AI development skills for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI — factory, design, implement, review, and cross-cutting workflows.
-  version: 0.4.2
+  version: 0.4.6
   owner:
     name: Defame1297
     email: defame1297@rkdr.net
@@ -79,31 +79,31 @@ marketplace:
     - name: kyberforge
       description: Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace.
       source: ./plugins/kyberforge
-      version: 1.6.0
+      version: 1.6.2
       category: Developer Tools
 
     - name: bin
-      description: A place for things to be binned
+      description: Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.
       source: ./plugins/bin
-      version: 1.1.3
+      version: 1.1.7
       category: Utilities
 
     - name: git
-      description: Skills for working with Git — conventional commits, branch management, pull requests, and feature flow.
+      description: Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it.
       source: ./plugins/git
-      version: 1.3.3
+      version: 1.3.7
       category: Version Control
 
     - name: gitea
-      description: Skills for managing Gitea repositories — issues, pull requests, milestones, releases, and wikis.
+      description: Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone.
       source: ./plugins/gitea
-      version: 1.3.4
+      version: 1.3.8
       category: Version Control
 
     - name: core
       description: Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.
       source: ./plugins/core
-      version: 1.1.1
+      version: 1.1.2
       category: Productivity
 
     - name: mattpocock-skills
@@ -115,5 +115,5 @@ marketplace:
     - name: lint
       description: Skills and agents for configuring and running linters.
       source: ./plugins/lint
-      version: 1.1.6
+      version: 1.1.7
       category: Developer Tools

docs/adr/0007-gitea-canonical-issue-tracker.md

@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ Three alternatives were rejected. Keeping the file-based fallback adds code comp
 
 The file-based model also had a structural weakness: issues in `docs/issues/` were invisible from the Gitea UI, making it impossible to track work, assign milestones, or filter by label without opening the repo locally. Gitea provides all of that natively.
 
-The "Provider-agnostic issue tracker" glossary entry in CONTEXT.md is updated in the same workstream to remove the file-based phase framing. The `providers/gitea/` adapter path described in ADR-0011 was never implemented — Gitea integration runs entirely via MCP, not a provider adapter.
+The "Provider-agnostic issue tracker" glossary entry in CONTEXT.md is updated in the same workstream to remove the file-based phase framing. (Amended 2026-08-17: the CONTEXT.md trim renamed that entry to **Issue**; it still records Gitea as this repo's canonical tracker and still tells skills to say "linked issue" generically.) The `providers/gitea/` adapter path described in ADR-0011 was never implemented — Gitea integration runs entirely via MCP, not a provider adapter.

docs/adr/0013-vale-harness-scope-and-rule-sources.md

@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ deferred PR #85 review item to broaden that coverage, retroactively captures #84
 (since it was never recorded as a decision in its own right), and layers the expansion on top
 without reversing or weakening the original four rules.
 
+**2026-08-17 amendment.** The CONTEXT.md section named above no longer holds that documentation.
+CONTEXT.md was cut back to a glossary and the prefilter's mechanics — the two-copy style layout,
+`vale-wrap.sh`, the `--config` argv defect, the rule inventory, and the 0-files-means-NOT-RUN
+fallback — moved to `docs/spec/gates.md`. Read that file, not CONTEXT.md, for the harness itself;
+this ADR still owns the scope decision.
+
 **File scope stays the same.** `SKILL.md` plus agent files (`**/agents/*.md`,
 `**/*.agent.md`) only — matching the existing prefilter's globs. Skill-level
 `README.md` files and `plugin.json` manifests are not added: README.md files are navigational, not

docs/adr/0015-apm-replaces-plugin-marketplace-authoring.md

@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ new hand-maintained manifest format.
   that work through to merge.
 - `CONTEXT.md`'s "Plugin"/"Plugin marketplace" glossary entries were rewritten in issue #90 to
   describe the compiled-output model directly, rather than carrying a forward-pointer to this ADR.
+  Superseded 2026-08-17: CONTEXT.md was cut back to one-line definitions, and the compiled-output
+  model is now described in `docs/spec/architecture.md`. The same trim deleted the "lint plugin"
+  entry cited under Considered options below; that pointer now reads `docs/spec/architecture.md`'s
+  plugin scope table, which carries the repo-agnostic-versus-marketplace-specific argument.
 
 ## Considered options
 
@@ -66,7 +70,7 @@ maintenance in place unchanged.
 
 **New standalone `plugins/apm/` plugin (rejected).** `plugins/lint/` was split out of `kyberforge`
 specifically because Vale tooling is generic and repo-agnostic, not holocron-marketplace-specific
-(see `CONTEXT.md`'s "lint plugin" entry) — the same argument applies to a generic `apm` CLI
+(see `docs/spec/architecture.md`'s plugin scope table) — the same argument applies to a generic `apm` CLI
 wrapper. The shipped `apm-install`/`apm-workflow` skills are, in fact, generic, repo-agnostic APM
 CLI documentation with no holocron-specific content, so a standalone `plugins/apm/` would have
 been a defensible split on artifact content alone. Rejected anyway, in favor of `kyberforge`,

docs/adr/0017-plugin-content-mirror-bridges-apm-to-host-discovery.md

@@ -329,7 +329,9 @@ mirror does carry, and is reported.
   stands; this ADR fixes the second, previously-unverified half.
 - `CONTEXT.md`'s "Plugin" and "Plugin marketplace" glossary entries are updated to describe the
   flat mirror as a second compiled-output category, alongside the existing
-  `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`/`marketplace.json` description.
+  `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`/`marketplace.json` description. Superseded 2026-08-17: CONTEXT.md was
+  cut back to one-line definitions and no longer describes either compiled-output category;
+  `docs/spec/architecture.md` is where the mirror is documented.
 - A future apm release that ships a native `.apm/`-aware plugin.json compiler (closing this gap
   upstream) would let `sync-plugin-content.sh` and its drift gate be deleted outright — nothing in
   this ADR's decision depends on the flat mirror existing beyond satisfying the current installer's

docs/adr/0018-repo-consumes-its-own-plugins-through-apm.md

@@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ answers to `git-commits` and `kyberforge:skill-audit` to `skill-audit`. This is
 a project skill has no plugin to prefix. `AGENTS.md` and `CONTEXT.md` are updated to name the bare
 form, which is what apm deploys and the only form a repo consuming holocron through apm gets.
 
-**Correction (2026-08-14): the namespaced form did not stop resolving.** An earlier revision of
+**Correction (2026-08-14): the namespaced form did not stop resolving.** *Superseded by the
+2026-08-17 correction below: the machine state this cites is no longer present. Both are kept
+because the pair is the finding — read neither as current.* An earlier revision of
 this consequence said every `<plugin>:<skill>` reference "was stale the moment the switch landed",
 and `AGENTS.md`/`CONTEXT.md` were written to match. That contradicts the "User scope is untouched,
 deliberately" consequence below, and the contradiction resolves against it: `~/.claude.json` still
@@ -72,6 +74,20 @@ survives those user-scope installs eventually being converted, and the namespace
 resolves for anyone installing holocron natively, so skill bodies written for both audiences
 should name the bare skill.
 
+**Correction (2026-08-17): the evidence under the correction above is gone, and the claim goes with
+it — not to its opposite.** Observed on this machine: `~/.claude/plugins/installed_plugins.json` is
+`{"version": 2, "plugins": {}}`; there is no `enabledPlugins` key anywhere in `~/.claude.json`
+(`grep -c enabledPlugins` returns 0); `~/.apm/marketplaces.json` is `{"marketplaces": []}`. The
+`holocron` entry in `~/.claude/plugins/known_marketplaces.json` survives, but a registered
+marketplace is not an installed plugin. So the user-scope installs the 2026-08-14 correction cited
+are not there, and neither is the state the *original* consequence described before it. The claim
+about the namespaced form has now been written twice off two different observations of the same
+machine, and this ADR has already reversed itself once on it. That is the finding: the fact is
+machine state, not a property of this decision, and it changes without any commit. No instruction
+file — `AGENTS.md`, `CONTEXT.md`, or a skill body — should assert either way whether
+`<plugin>:<skill>` resolves. The rule that survives every observation is the one that was always the
+actionable half: write the bare name, because it is the only form `apm install` produces.
+
 **apm owns `.claude/settings.json`.** (ADR-0019 supersedes the "exactly `{"hooks": {}}`" claim
 below — once a package ships a hook, apm merges it into that file and the merged entry is apm's own
 output. The rule that nothing repo-authored goes in the file is unchanged.) `apm audit --ci` replays the install into a scratch tree and
@@ -117,10 +133,11 @@ pinned `resolved_commit` in `apm.lock.yaml` and does not re-resolve refs (`apm i
 documents this explicitly — "does NOT refresh refs; use 'apm update' for that"). Running it after a
 merge redeploys the same content and reports success.
 
-**User scope is untouched, deliberately.** `bin@holocron`, `gitea@holocron`, and a stale
+**User scope is untouched, deliberately.** This decision changed project scope only; whatever is
-`hello-world@holocron` remain natively installed at user scope, and every project other than this
+natively installed at user scope was left alone, and converting it is a separate decision with a
-one still resolves its skills that way. Converting them is a separate decision with a blast radius
+blast radius beyond this repo. The specific inventory this paragraph used to name
-beyond this repo.
+(`bin@holocron`, `gitea@holocron`, a stale `hello-world@holocron`) is machine state and is stale —
+see the 2026-08-17 correction above. The decision recorded here is unaffected by what that state is.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 

docs/adr/0020-skill-description-and-body-context-contract.md

@@ -127,8 +127,15 @@ clause**, and a **boundary clause**. Capability enumeration, output-format detai
   gate shipping hot with no baseline cannot give two answers. Under the walk-up those four resolve
   because sibling plugins are in the universe — no plugin here declares a cross-plugin apm
   dependency, and none needs to. Verified: a tree holding only `plugins/` and the root `apm.yml`,
-  with no `.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, now produces findings identical to the working tree —
+  with no `.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, produced findings identical to the working tree. The
-  26 description FAILs, 9 body FAILs, 2 dangling targets, 0 missing references, 58 SUGGESTIONs.
+  figures that reproduction recorded — 26 description FAILs, 9 body FAILs, 2 dangling targets, 0
+  missing references, 58 SUGGESTIONs — are the **pre-retrofit** corpus as it stood when the
+  experiment ran, kept here as the evidence for the install-independence claim, not as a current
+  reading. *Amended 2026-09-01: the #99 retrofit took the first three to zero. Measured at that
+  date over the same install-free tree: 0 description FAILs, 0 body FAILs, 0 dangling targets, 0
+  missing references, 29 SUGGESTIONs.* What the experiment establishes is that the two trees agree,
+  not what either measured; re-derive rather than quote —
+  `bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`.
 - **The universe is the apm marketplace, and nothing else.** A routing target resolves to a skill or
   an agent, or it does not resolve. Host built-ins are deliberately outside it: `/compact`, `/clear`
   and `/init` are Claude Code slash commands with no counterpart in Copilot CLI or Codex, so a
@@ -185,8 +192,11 @@ becomes the system prompt of a fresh context. The rationale for the 900-word FAI
 That exemption is expressed in `agent-audit/scripts/validate.sh`, which has no body constant, and in
 the `files:` pattern of the `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook, which is `SKILL.md`-only. It is *not*
 expressed in `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` itself, which measures whatever path it is handed —
-running it directly over `plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md` today reports 900-word body FAILs on
+running it directly over `plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md` exits 1 with 900-word body FAILs on
-`git-orchestrate` (933), `gitea-orchestrate` (1,199) and `apm-orchestrate` (1,080). Agents escape by
+`git-orchestrate` and `gitea-orchestrate`. *Amended 2026-09-01: this sentence named a third agent,
+`apm-orchestrate`, at 1,080 words. It is 876 today — a SUGGESTION, not a FAIL. Counts are
+deliberately no longer pinned here: agent bodies are edited like any other file and a figure in this
+paragraph goes stale the moment one is trimmed. Run the command.* Agents escape by
 file pattern, not by the script knowing the difference. Anyone widening that pattern to cover agents
 would silently enforce a gate this ADR declines to set.
 
@@ -203,8 +213,14 @@ with no trigger list.
 
 Verified end-to-end rather than assumed: `plugins/bin/.apm/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4` carries the
 flag, apm passes it through verbatim to both `.claude/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4` and the flat mirror
-at `plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4`, and `zoom-out` is the one installed skill absent from
+at `plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md:4`, and `zoom-out` was — at the time of that check, when it
-the model-visible skill listing in a live session. It remains invocable as `/zoom-out`.
+was the only carrier — the one installed skill absent from the model-visible skill listing in a live
+session. It remains invocable as `/zoom-out`. `caveman` has since taken the flag as well, so the
+corpus now has **two** carriers. Do not read a carrier list off this page; re-derive it:
+
+```
+grep -l '^disable-model-invocation: true' plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md
+```
 
 ### Merging siblings
 
@@ -219,10 +235,13 @@ rather than the core job.
 skills still exist separately, and this change made the split deeper rather than shallower: retrofit
 to the dispatch pattern took `skill-audit` from 3 reference files to 7 and `agent-audit` from 4 to 8,
 and their two same-named `references/description-quality.md` files now differ on 100 of ~120 lines
-after normalising `skill`/`agent`, where before they were closer. The merge stays the decision; it
+after normalising `skill`/`agent`, where before they were closer. It has kept deepening since: the
-reopens ADR-0008 (agent-audit's single-file invocation contract) and touches every call site in
+#99 retrofit added `finding-criteria.md` to `skill-audit`, drawing it level with `agent-audit`. Both
-`skill-author`, `agent-author` and `forge`, which is why it is its own change and not a rider on
+figures move with the next retrofit, so measure rather than quote —
-this one. Recorded here rather than dropped, so the gap between the rule and the tree is deliberate
+`ls plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/<name>/references/ | grep -c '\.md$'`. The merge stays the
+decision; it reopens ADR-0008 (agent-audit's single-file invocation contract) and touches every call
+site in `skill-author`, `agent-author` and `forge`, which is why it is its own change and not a rider
+on this one. Recorded here rather than dropped, so the gap between the rule and the tree is deliberate
 and dated instead of discovered later.
 
 ### Enforcement and rollout
@@ -233,11 +252,13 @@ which tier each rule is in, because the failure this ADR is most exposed to is a
 
 | Check | Applies to | Tier | Home |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| description characters (250 SUGGESTION / 400 FAIL) | skills, agents | deterministic | `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`; constants mirrored in `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh` and `agent-audit/scripts/validate.sh` |
+| description characters (250 SUGGESTION † / 400 FAIL) | skills, agents | deterministic | `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`; constants mirrored in `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh` and `agent-audit/scripts/validate.sh` |
 | body-only words (600 SUGGESTION / 900 FAIL) | skills | deterministic | `skill-size-check.sh`, `skill-audit/scripts/validate.sh` |
 | description present and non-empty (ERROR) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
-| boundary target resolves to a real skill or agent (ERROR when written as `/name` or `-> name`, or when its own sentence names another target that resolves; SUGGESTION otherwise) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
+| boundary target resolves to a real skill or agent — **three** verdicts, not two (ERROR when written in route notation — `/name`, or any arrow form; or when a *terminal* bare name's own sentence names another target that resolves. SUGGESTION otherwise. INFO, "DID NOT RUN", exit 0, when no skill universe could be determined for the path at all — no authoring root above it, no apm package root, no declared apm dependencies, no deployed `.claude/` or `.agents/` tree: the targets are named and left unchecked) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
-| boundary clause absent (SUGGESTION) | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
+| boundary clause absent — `absent` (SUGGESTION) † | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
+| an arrow clause is present but no target can be read out of it — `unparsed` (SUGGESTION) † | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
+| one arrow clause naming two or more targets, of which only the first is resolved (SUGGESTION, issue #107) † | skills, agents | deterministic | same |
 | Gotchas entry count over five (SUGGESTION) | skills | deterministic | same |
 | Gotchas over 25% of the body (SUGGESTION) | skills | deterministic | same |
 | every `references/<file>.md` a body names exists (ERROR) | skills | deterministic | same |
@@ -254,6 +275,21 @@ that guessed at them would be a worse gate than no gate, because it would be bel
 enforced, they are reviewed, and this table exists so that distinction is written down rather than
 inferred from whether a validator happens to have been written yet.
 
+**† These four, and only these four, are lifted for a hand-invoked file** — one whose frontmatter
+carries `disable-model-invocation: true`, read as a boolean by `hand_invoked()` in all three scripts.
+No validator knew the field existed (issue **#108**), so every routing SUGGESTION above fired on
+exactly the shape the *Invocation as a design axis* section mandates, and the boundary-clause
+remedy — "so the router knows where NOT to send this skill" — was addressed to a router that cannot
+see the skill at all. An author who took the advice made the file worse.
+
+What does **not** lift is the point of the carve-out. Both body word tiers stand: the body is still
+loaded on invocation and still competes with the caller's live conversation. The 400-character
+description FAIL stands: that description is not preloaded, but it is the one line a user reads when
+choosing from the `/` menu, and the ceiling is an outlier stop rather than a routing-quality budget —
+which is exactly why the 250-character *target* is the tier that lifts. And a target the description
+does happen to name is still resolved and can still dangle as a blocking ERROR. Mechanics, and the
+reason the field is read as a boolean rather than as a mention of the key: `docs/spec/gates.md`.
+
 Two of the deterministic rows are tuned for **false positives over recall**, and what they decline to
 see is part of the contract. On target extraction: a bare hyphenated name counts only inside a
 boundary sentence, and a single-word name is never matchable bare — `research`, `triage`, `forge`,
@@ -264,7 +300,8 @@ raise an error: one followed by an ordinary lowercase noun is a compound **modif
 confirm-only — it still resolves and still counts as a route when the name exists, but it can never
 dangle. Only a *terminal* target can. The compressed arrow form `→ <name>` is exempt from that
 follower test and is always error-eligible, because nothing reads as a compound modifier after an
-arrow; a `/slash` target reached through a route verb is **not** exempt and takes the same test. The
+arrow; a `/slash` target reached through a route verb is **not** exempt and takes the same test.
+*Amended 2026-08-31 — the `/slash` half is reversed: it is exempt too. See the amendment below.* The
 simpler rule — "only marked targets may dangle" — was available and would have been wrong here: both
 live true positives are bare, `research`'s "(use neuledge-context)" and the `gitea-labels-` /
 `milestones` fold. On the body-shape checks: a `## Gotchas` heading must *end* in "gotchas", not
@@ -296,6 +333,46 @@ Three pre-existing contradictions are fixed in the same change, because they are
 - `description-quality.md:45-50` has no FAIL condition for internal-mechanics content, which is why
   `skill-author/SKILL.md:102` never bit.
 
+## Amendment (2026-08-31): route notation short-circuits the follower test, `/name` included
+
+The Enforcement section above exempts the arrow form from the follower test and then withholds the
+same exemption from `/name`: "a `/slash` target reached through a route verb is **not** exempt and
+takes the same test." That half is reversed. **Both spellings of route notation are exempt, and the
+exemption is decided before the follower test rather than weighed against it.**
+
+Three things make the original call wrong rather than merely strict.
+
+**It contradicted the promise the same paragraph makes.** Route notation is offered to an author as
+the way to get a target checked unconditionally — the SUGGESTION text on an unpromoted target says
+so in as many words: "write it as `/name` or `-> name` and it will be checked properly." Under the
+original rule that was true of one of the two spellings. `-> name` reached `_add()` with
+`strict=True` from both its call sites; `/name` did not, so it fell through to `_terminal()` and any
+follower outside `FOLLOWER_OK` demoted it. `Do not use for Y — use /no-such-skill afterwards.` exited
+0 — and, before the companion visibility fix, in total silence.
+
+**The follower test's own justification does not reach `/name`.** That test exists for *prose*: a
+bare hyphenated token followed by an ordinary lowercase noun is a compound modifier, "pre-commit
+hooks" and "pull-request template". A leading slash is Claude Code's invocation syntax and occurs in
+no English compound, so there is no attributive reading to protect. The exemption was withheld from
+the one shape the rule it protects against cannot describe.
+
+**`FOLLOWER_OK` is a closed whitelist of roughly eighty words, and a closed list is the wrong thing
+to hang a blocking gate on.** Leaving `/name` under it made *whether a commit is blocked* depend on
+whether someone had thought to enumerate the next word — the gate failing open on its own
+unfamiliarity. The bare-target path keeps the follower test precisely because it needs a brake it can
+justify; the notation path asked for one and was given the same brake by accident.
+
+What is unchanged: the **corroboration** branch. A *bare* terminal name still earns its blocking
+ERROR only from a resolving sibling in the same sentence, and a compound modifier still cannot
+dangle at all. The conservative tuning that decision rests on is untouched — this amendment moves one
+explicitly-marked spelling out from under it, not the prose path.
+
+Verified on fixtures inside a synthetic plugin tree: `… Do not use for Y — use /no-such-skill
+afterwards.` exits 1, while the same sentence with the bare `no-such-skill` exits 0 at SUGGESTION,
+and rises to a blocking ERROR the moment a resolving sibling joins it. The reasoning is recorded at
+the point of enforcement in `_add()`'s docstring in `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` and its two
+mirrored copies, and the verdict table in `docs/spec/gates.md` states the corrected shape.
+
 ## Consequences
 
 **Editing any non-compliant skill now requires retrofitting it first.** At decision time, 30 of 39
@@ -311,10 +388,17 @@ carries is the ordinary one for hot gates: a gate expensive enough to be inconve
 with `SKIP=` and loses its authority.
 
 **A second hot gate ships alongside it, and it is easy to miss.** `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` is
-`level: error` like every other rule in that style, so `pre-commit run --all-files` is red on 10
+`level: error` like every other rule in that style, so at decision time `pre-commit run --all-files`
-alerts across `gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs` and `gitea-workflow`
+was red on 10 alerts across `gitea-issues`, `gitea-labels-milestones`, `gitea-prs` and
-independently of anything `skill-size-check` reports. Someone scoping the #99 retrofit off the size
+`gitea-workflow` independently of anything `skill-size-check` reports. Someone scoping the #99
-findings alone will fix those and still be blocked. The two gates want fixing together.
+retrofit off the size findings alone would have fixed those and still been blocked. The two gates
+wanted fixing together, and were. *Amended 2026-09-01: that figure is historical. The Vale prefilter
+over the same 39 files now reports 0 errors, 0 warnings and 0 suggestions, so
+`Kyberforge.CompositionNote` fires nowhere in the corpus today. The rule is still hot and still
+independent of `skill-size-check`, so a new description can reintroduce it; `skill-size-check` does
+not cover the Vale half, and no `references/` file is linted by anything (`docs/spec/gates.md` has
+both causes, issue #117 tracks them). Re-derive rather than quote —*
+`bash plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-audit/scripts/vale-wrap.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md`.
 
 **A ceiling does not produce an average.** If every author writes to the 400-character FAIL, the
 preload lands at 39 × 400 = 15,600 chars — a 33% cut off 23,427, not the ~50% intended. Writing to
@@ -342,8 +426,8 @@ and `git-*` families — where every sibling shares a keyword and boundary claus
 — are the ones most likely to sit at the FAIL tier permanently. If the retrofit shows that family
 routing degrades, the tier is the first thing to revisit.
 
-**Four broken routing targets were found; two are fixed here and two are live.** Tracked as issue
+**Four broken routing targets were found; two were fixed here and two shortly after.** Tracked as
-#100.
+issue #100.
 
 - `skill-audit` routed to `/skill-improve` twice in its description plus `README.md:10`, and no such
   skill exists — the real target is `skill-author`. **Fixed here**, as a side effect of retrofitting
@@ -353,14 +437,24 @@ routing degrades, the tier is the first thing to revisit.
   detectable by the resolvable-target check and never will be: "examine agent files manually" names
   no target, and a check that resolves names cannot see a name that is absent. A misroute to nowhere
   is a review finding, not a gate finding.
-- `research` routes to `neuledge-context`, which exists only inside that string. **Live.**
+- `research` routes to `neuledge-context`, which exists only inside that string. Was **live**;
+  **fixed under #99** — the retrofitted description names no such target.
 - `gitea-issues` carries the literal string `gitea-labels- milestones` in its folded description, a
-  stray space introduced by YAML wrapping mid-token, breaking the skill name in preloaded text.
+  stray space introduced by YAML wrapping mid-token, breaking the skill name in preloaded text. Was
-  **Live** — the check reports it as a dangling `gitea-labels`.
+  **live**, reported as a dangling `gitea-labels`; **fixed under #99** — the name now folds intact.
 
-So the check fires on 3 of the 4 against the base commit and on 2 at the tip of this change, and
+So the check fired on 3 of the 4 against the base commit and on 2 at the tip of the change that
-`tests/test-skill-size-check.sh` probes exactly those three by name rather than asserting a count, so
+carried this ADR. **The corpus dangling set is now empty**, and that is asserted rather than
-it degrades to SKIP as #100 lands rather than going stale.
+observed: `tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh` pins the set as empty, so a new boundary clause naming a
+non-existent skill fails the suite instead of joining a backlog. `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh`
+probed the three original names rather than asserting a count; as each was retrofitted its probe was
+**removed, not skipped**, because a `pass "SKIP: …"` branch is an assertion-free result counted in
+the totals and makes the suite look one test stronger than it is. That file's commentary survives the
+probes and states the rule. Re-derive the current set — never read it off this page:
+
+```
+bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md | grep 'does not resolve'
+```
 
 **Duplication between `skill-author` and `agent-author` survives un-gated.** The merge rule
 deliberately excludes the author pair, so the commit-verification argument in four near-copies, the

docs/adr/0021-plugin-descriptions-state-a-domain-boundary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+# A plugin's published description states its domain boundary and never enumerates its skills
+
+Three of this repo's six plugins publish a `description` that lists the skills they ship. That style
+has now failed three times in four days, the third time inside the correction for the second. It is
+enforced by nothing, it obliges a marketplace release on every skill addition, and it was never
+applied to the other three plugins. This ADR retires it: a published description says what the
+plugin is *for*, and the inventory lives where an inventory can be read off the tree.
+
+**Status: accepted (2026-08-17).**
+
+## Context
+
+A plugin's published description is one string authored twice — in `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` and in
+the matching `marketplace.packages[]` entry of the root `apm.yml` — and compiled into four generated
+files per plugin edit: the plugin's `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `.github/plugin/plugin.json`,
+plus the repo-wide `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` and its `.github/plugin/marketplace.json`
+mirror. (`.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`, apm's codex profile, carries no per-package
+`description` or `version` at all and is unaffected.) It is the only text a consumer sees in a marketplace listing before
+installing. It is **not** a SKILL.md `description`: it is never preloaded into an agent's context and
+routes nothing at runtime. ADR-0020 governs that other artifact; this one governs this one. The
+overlap is a finding, not a scope: ADR-0020 established that capability enumeration in a description
+is "a correctness hazard, not only a token cost". The hazard at this layer is different — staleness
+in published metadata rather than an agent shortcutting the body — but the enumeration is the same
+construct and it fails the same way.
+
+Measured at `de84d1b`, the branch tip before this change. Each figure is reproducible from the tree:
+skill counts are `ls plugins/<name>/.apm/skills/ | wc -l`, description text is
+`plugins/<name>/apm.yml`.
+
+| Plugin | Style | Skills | Items enumerated | Skills named | Unnamed |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| `bin` | enumeration | 11 | 8 | 9 | `caveman`, `zoom-out` |
+| `git` | enumeration | 9 | 8 | 8 | `git-workflow` |
+| `gitea` | enumeration | 7 | 7 | 6 | `gitea-workflow` |
+| `core` | boundary | 3 | — | — | — |
+| `kyberforge` | boundary | 7 | — | — | — |
+| `lint` | boundary | 2 | — | — | — |
+
+Three failures, in order.
+
+**`bb9158d` (2026-08-14) — `core`'s description described `bin`.** The text it deleted read
+"Cross-cutting utility skills for everyday AI-assisted coding — triage, diagnosis, architecture
+review, and session navigation." All four items are real skills and not one of them is `core`'s:
+they are `bin`'s `triage`, `diagnose`, `improve-codebase-architecture` and `zoom-out`. `core` ships
+`agentsmd-author`, `agentsmd-audit` and `provider-adapter-author`, and the published description
+named none of them.
+
+This is the failure the whole style was later adopted against, and it is worth being exact about
+what it was, because the record has been read the other way twice since. It was **wrong content**,
+not an incomplete list. The description was a syntactically perfect, complete, four-item enumeration
+of a real skill set; it just belonged to a different plugin. Enumerating harder could not have caught
+it, and a gate that asked "does every enumerated item exist as a skill?" would have passed it — all
+four did exist. `bb9158d`'s own fix went the other direction: it replaced the enumeration with a
+domain boundary, and `core` has needed no correction since. The precedent set by that commit was
+therefore *boundary*, and the two commits below cite it while doing the opposite.
+
+**`65bac15` (2026-08-17) — `git` advertised `gitea`'s domain, `gitea` advertised a skill that does
+not exist.** `git` read "conventional commits, branch management, pull requests, and feature flow";
+pull requests reach the forge over HTTP and are `gitea`'s, which is the exact boundary
+`docs/spec/architecture.md` draws between the two plugins. `gitea` read "issues, pull requests,
+milestones, releases, and wikis"; `grep -ri wiki plugins/gitea/.apm/` returns nothing and no wiki
+skill has ever existed. Both were repaired by re-enumerating.
+
+**`de84d1b` (2026-08-17) — the re-enumeration was itself incomplete.** `bin`'s "A place for things to
+be binned" was replaced with an eight-item list over eleven skills; `caveman` and `zoom-out` are
+absent. `zoom-out` is the same skill `bb9158d` had called "session navigation" three days earlier
+while deleting it from the wrong plugin's description — named when it was in the wrong place,
+unnamed once it was in the right one. And the miss is not confined to `bin`: `git-workflow` is
+unnamed in `git`'s corrected description, though `65bac15`'s own commit message states it was added
+("omitting pc-author/pc-run, git-submodules and git-workflow"), and `gitea-workflow` is unnamed in
+`gitea`'s. Across the three plugins, 23 of 27 skills are named at the third attempt.
+
+**Nothing checks any of this.** `scripts/check-manifests.sh` does not contain the string
+`description`. The three ADR-0020 validators (`scripts/skill-size-check.sh` and skill-audit's and
+agent-audit's `validate.sh`) gate on SKILL.md and agent frontmatter; they do open `apm.yml`, but only
+to read `dependencies.apm` when resolving the boundary-target universe — none of them reads the
+`description:` key, and their hook globs match `SKILL.md` and `*.agent.md` only. `apm audit --ci`,
+`apm pack --check-clean` and `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh --check --all` all compare compiled
+output against `apm.yml`, so their entire job is to propagate whatever the description says into
+those four files byte-for-byte and confirm they match. The `wiki` claim passed every one of the fourteen pre-push hooks, every day it
+was published.
+
+**And the obligation is unbounded.** Under enumeration, adding one skill to `bin`, `git` or `gitea`
+means editing two copies of a prose string on top of the version bumps and regeneration any skill
+addition already owes under this repo's release policy
+(`plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/apm-workflow/references/marketplace.md`). The bumps are not the
+marginal cost — the prose edit is, and it is the half nothing checks. A skill *rename* triggers the
+same, for a string no consumer can tell went stale. 27 of the repo's 39 skills sat behind
+a description carrying that obligation; the other 12 did not, and their three plugins have generated
+no defect of this class.
+
+### Scope
+
+This decision covers the six plugins this repo authors. The root marketplace also lists
+`mattpocock-skills`, a third-party package whose description is not this repo's to write; its entry
+is out of scope and is left as published upstream.
+
+## Decision
+
+**A plugin's published `description` states the plugin's domain boundary. It does not enumerate the
+skills the plugin ships, by name or by paraphrase.**
+
+- The boundary answers "what kind of work belongs to this plugin, and where is its edge against its
+  nearest sibling" — the question a consumer deciding whether to install is actually asking. It is
+  stable under skill addition, rename and removal, which is the entire point: an artifact that does
+  not change when the tree changes cannot go stale against it.
+- **The boundary must cover everything the plugin actually ships.** A boundary drawn narrower than
+  the contents is the same defect as an incomplete enumeration, one level up, and it is the specific
+  risk in this change. `git` carries `pc-author` and `pc-run`, which are not git operations at all;
+  "Skills for working with Git" silently drops them, so the boundary names the pre-commit hooks
+  explicitly rather than trusting a reader to file them under Git.
+- The two copies — package `apm.yml` and the root `marketplace.packages[]` entry — stay identical.
+  This is already the rule in practice and both prior corrections state why: the root entry is what
+  reaches the compiled marketplace, so fixing only the package manifest leaves it half-propagated.
+- The three descriptions, rewritten here, with `core`/`kyberforge`/`lint` shown for register:
+
+  | Plugin | Published description | Chars |
+  |---|---|---|
+  | `bin` | Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin. | 152 |
+  | `git` | Skills and agents for working with a local Git clone over the git wire protocol, and for authoring and running the pre-commit hooks that guard it. | 146 |
+  | `gitea` | Skills and agents for working with a Gitea forge through its HTTP API — the forge's own objects, as distinct from the local git clone. | 134 |
+  | `core` | *(unchanged)* Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it. | 101 |
+  | `kyberforge` | *(unchanged)* Skills and agents for creating, maintaining, and managing a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace. | 105 |
+  | `lint` | *(unchanged)* Skills and agents for configuring and running linters. | 54 |
+
+- **No gate is added.** This is a deliberate omission and the reasoning is below, not an item left
+  for later.
+
+### Why no gate
+
+The check enumeration would need — "every skill directory appears in the description" — was writable
+in principle and was never written, including by the two commits that corrected an enumeration by
+enumerating again and had every reason to. It is also only half a check: it
+catches a skill missing from the list, and it cannot catch `wiki`, because "this noun does not name
+any skill" requires a vocabulary of permissible non-skill nouns that no one is going to maintain.
+Under a boundary there is no correspondence left to check, which is the property being bought.
+
+What survives un-gated is `bb9158d`'s actual failure: a boundary that is simply wrong about its
+plugin. That was never machine-checkable in either style — the text was a well-formed description of
+a real plugin — and it is caught by the same review that has to happen when a published,
+consumer-facing string is edited at all. A gate that would catch it needs a declared per-plugin
+skill-to-boundary mapping for the description to be checked against, which is a second artifact
+requiring exactly the per-skill maintenance this ADR exists to delete, relocated one file over.
+
+Two cheap partial gates were considered and rejected in the same breath. Forbidding a comma-separated
+run of three or more noun phrases is a prose heuristic that fires on `lint`'s perfectly good
+"configuring and running linters" class of sentence. Forbidding any string matching a skill directory
+name under `plugins/<name>/.apm/skills/` bans legitimate boundary vocabulary — `git-branches` exists,
+and a `git` boundary has every right to say "branches". Both would be believed, and both would be
+wrong, which ADR-0020 already records as worse than no gate.
+
+## Considered options
+
+**Keep enumeration and gate it.** The only option that makes the current style safe. Rejected on the
+three grounds above: the check is one-directional, it cannot see an invented capability, and it makes
+a marketplace release the consequence of adding a directory. It also hard-couples published consumer
+copy to internal directory names, so a skill rename becomes a version bump on the plugin and on the
+marketplace.
+
+**Enumerate consistently across all six plugins**, on the grounds that the real defect is the split
+style. Rejected: it takes an obligation that has produced three failures on three plugins and applies
+it to six. The measured outcome of the most recent attempt to enumerate carefully, with the defect
+fresh and two prior commits as precedent, is four skills unnamed.
+
+**Cap the description length**, mirroring ADR-0020's 250/400-character tiers, on the theory that a
+short description has no room to enumerate. Rejected because length does not measure correspondence:
+`gitea`'s failing description was 96 characters and asserted a skill that has never existed, while
+`bin`'s 176-character enumeration is under the same cap. All six descriptions here, before and after,
+sit inside ADR-0020's tiers; the tier would have been silent through all three failures.
+
+**Delete the description to a bare name.** Rejected: apm's Claude marketplace mapper emits
+`description` into `marketplace.json`, and it is the only prose a consumer sees before installing.
+
+**Point the description at the plugin's `README.md`.** Rejected: a marketplace listing renders a
+string, not a link — and the README's own plugin list carries the same enumeration with the same
+staleness, so this relocates the defect rather than fixing it.
+
+## Consequences
+
+**Three descriptions are rewritten and the compiled output regenerated.** Eight generated files
+change: `plugins/{bin,git,gitea}/.claude-plugin/plugin.json`,
+`plugins/{bin,git,gitea}/.github/plugin/plugin.json`, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` and its
+byte-identical `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` mirror. `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (the
+codex profile) is unchanged and correctly so — it carries no per-package `description` or `version`
+field at all, only `name`, `source`, `policy` and `category`.
+
+**Version bumps, all PATCH under the `per_package` strategy:** `bin` 1.1.4 → 1.1.5, `git` 1.3.4 →
+1.3.5, `gitea` 1.3.5 → 1.3.6, `marketplace.version` 0.4.4 → 0.4.5.
+
+**The root `apm.yml` top-level `version:` is restored to lockstep with `marketplace.version`,
+0.4.2 → 0.4.5.** These two fields have moved together in every commit that has ever touched root
+`apm.yml` — 0.3.2, 0.3.3, 0.3.4, 0.4.0, 0.4.1, 0.4.2 in both — until `65bac15` and
+`de84d1b` on this branch bumped `marketplace.version` to 0.4.3 and then 0.4.4 while leaving the
+top-level field at 0.4.2. Lockstep is not folklore: it is stated at
+`plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/apm-workflow/references/marketplace.md`. This is a defect, not a
+style: `apm.yml`'s comment inside the marketplace block records that the top-level `version:` is not inherited into the compiled output
+"despite being used elsewhere (e.g. by `apm audit`)", so the field is live and was silently two
+releases behind what the marketplace published. Closed here rather than tracked, because the
+correction is one line and the drift is three days old.
+
+**`docs/spec/architecture.md`'s plugin table is unchanged and stays a routing table.** It answers
+"where does a new skill go" for someone working *inside* this repo; the published description answers
+"should I install this" for someone outside it. The two now read similarly, and that is not
+duplication to collapse — they have different readers and different lifecycles, and the table already
+says so in its own preamble ("These are routing boundaries, not inventories"). One caveat for whoever
+next edits that page: its closing sentence sends a reader to the published description "for what a
+consumer actually gets", which was true against an enumeration and is now a pointer to a second
+boundary statement. Neither artifact carries an inventory after this change, so that sentence was
+rewritten in the same branch to point at `plugins/<name>/.apm/skills/` and `README.md` instead.
+
+**`README.md`'s plugin bullet list becomes the only place an inventory lives, and it still
+enumerates.** That is deliberate, but it makes the list load-bearing in a way it was not before, so
+its `bin`, `git` and `gitea` bullets were completed in the same branch to name every skill those
+plugins ship. This ADR does not otherwise extend to it: a README is a hand-read document where a
+list of what you get is the useful thing, it is not compiled into four files, and a stale line in it
+costs a reader a moment rather than misrepresenting a published package. The tradeoff that makes
+enumeration wrong in a marketplace manifest is precisely the one that makes it fine there.
+
+**Nothing in the ADR-0020 gate set changes.** Its character and word tiers, its Vale rules and its
+three validators all read `SKILL.md` and `*.agent.md` frontmatter; none of them opens an `apm.yml`.
+The two contracts are adjacent and independent, and a future author retrofitting a skill under
+issue #99 is not touched by this ADR.
+
+**The failure mode this leaves open is a wrong boundary, and it is un-gated by design.** If a fourth
+failure of this class occurs it will be a description that describes the wrong plugin — `bb9158d`'s
+shape, the one enumeration never addressed. That is the trigger to revisit, and the thing to build
+then is a declared skill-to-boundary mapping, not a return to enumeration.

docs/adr/0022-skill-metadata-version-is-mandatory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# Every skill's `metadata.version` is mandatory, not a per-plugin option
+
+**Status: accepted (2026-09-07).**
+
+## Context
+
+`metadata.version` is optional SKILL.md frontmatter (`create.md`'s "Optional frontmatter" list:
+"uncomment and fill in, or remove entirely"). `skill-author`'s own bump logic was written
+conditionally — "with `metadata.version` present, bump the minor version on create... and the
+patch version on improve" — which only makes sense if presence is a real per-skill choice.
+
+Adoption never followed a rule; it followed the plugin. Of 39 skills, 12 carry a version:
+
+| Plugin | Has it | Total |
+|---|---|---|
+| `core` | 3 | 3 |
+| `gitea` | 6 | 7 |
+| `lint` | 2 | 2 |
+| `git` | 1 | 9 |
+| `bin` | 0 | 11 |
+| `kyberforge` | 0 | 7 |
+
+`core`, `gitea` and `lint` are consistent adopters (`gitea-files` the one gap); `bin` and
+`kyberforge` are consistent non-adopters; `git` has one outlier (`git-commits`, versioned for no
+plugin-specific reason found on inspection — no comment, no cross-reference, nothing distinguishing
+it from its eight siblings). Issue #127 raised this as an undocumented split: two house norms
+coexisting with no stated rule for which applies where, the same class of defect as an unstated
+`rtk`/bare-`git` convention (#113) found in the same audit pass.
+
+## Decision
+
+**Every skill's frontmatter carries `metadata.version`.** It is no longer optional, and no longer a
+per-plugin choice.
+
+- **The 27 skills that never carried one are seeded at `1.0.0`**, not `0.1.0`. `0.1.0` is
+  `skill-author`'s existing new-skill starting point, chosen for a skill with no revision history to
+  its name yet. These 27 have all been through the ADR-0020 retrofit and repeated audit passes
+  without ever tracking a version; crediting them with `0.1.0` would understate that, and there is
+  no real history to justify seeding higher than a first stable release. `1.0.0` marks "versioned as
+  of this retrofit," `0.1.0` keeps meaning "created and never yet revised."
+- **New skills still start at `0.1.0`.** `skill-author`'s create/improve bump convention is
+  unchanged; only the presence of the field stops being conditional.
+- **The one outlier in the other direction, `git-commits`, keeps its existing value** (`0.1.3`) —
+  it already had real tracked history under the old conditional rule, and this decision does not
+  reset skills that were already compliant.
+- **`bin/write-docs`'s top-level `version:` moves into `metadata:`, normalized to `1.0.0`.** It is
+  the one skill that carried a version outside the `metadata:` block, which is why the table above
+  counts `bin` as 0 — a top-level `version:` is not `metadata.version`, and nothing reads it. #127
+  raised it alongside the split because "does a skill carry a version" and "where does it live" are
+  the same question. Its value (`1.0`) is not semver and carries no more real history than the 27
+  unversioned skills, so it is relocated and reset to the same `1.0.0` seed rather than preserved
+  like `git-commits`'s tracked `0.1.3`.
+- **`skill-frontmatter`'s pre-commit hook gains the check.** It already fails a SKILL.md missing
+  `name:` or `description:`; a missing `metadata.version` is now the same class of failure, not a
+  style nit an audit might or might not catch.
+
+## Considered options
+
+**Leave it per-plugin, document the split.** This was the initial framing of #127 and is coherent —
+`core`/`gitea`/`lint` keep it, `bin`/`kyberforge` don't, two outliers get normalized to match their
+plugin. Rejected on reconsideration: a rule that says "some plugins track this and some don't" is
+strictly harder to state, audit and onboard against than "every skill does," for a field whose entire
+job is answering "did this change since I last read it" — a question with the same shape everywhere
+it's asked, not one that varies by plugin domain.
+
+**Drop the field corpus-wide.** Rejected: `skill-author` already depends on it to decide whether a
+create/improve pass owes a bump, so the 12 skills carrying it are not tracking dead weight — removing
+it discards real revision signal for no gain.
+
+## Consequences
+
+27 SKILL.md files gain `metadata.version: "1.0.0"`, and a 28th — `bin/write-docs` — reaches the same
+value by relocating its top-level `version: "1.0"` into `metadata:`. `skill-author`'s `create.md`
+moves the field from "Optional frontmatter" to the required list, citing this ADR. `skill-author`'s
+own SKILL.md drops the "with `metadata.version` present" conditional in its bump-rule line, since
+presence is no longer in question. `.pre-commit-config.yaml`'s `skill-frontmatter` hook is extended
+to require the field, closing the gap #113 and #118 both named in the same audit pass: a stated rule
+with nothing enforcing it drifts the same way an unstated one does.

docs/adr/0023-rtk-prefix-marks-executable-commands-only.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+# The `rtk` prefix marks executable commands only, and is repo-wide
+
+**Status: accepted (2026-09-08).**
+
+## Context
+
+`CLAUDE.md` states the org convention as a golden rule: "Always prefix commands with `rtk`. If RTK
+has a dedicated filter, it uses it. If not, it passes through unchanged. This means RTK is always
+safe to use." Issue #113 observed that the rule had never been written down for skill *prose*, where
+a `git <subcommand>` mention can be either an instruction to execute or a reference to the concept,
+and that the corpus had drifted into carrying both spellings with no stated rule. PR #130 swept the
+`git` plugin and recorded a two-way split in `plugins/git/README.md`.
+
+Review found two defects in that sweep, and both are in the premise rather than the execution.
+
+**RTK is not output-transparent.** `rtk git --help` enumerates twelve filtered subcommands — `diff`,
+`log`, `status`, `show`, `add`, `commit`, `push`, `pull`, `branch`, `fetch`, `stash`, `worktree`.
+Everything else is a true passthrough. Inside that set the filter is not a formatting preference; it
+changes what the command *reports*. Measured against rtk 0.42.4:
+
+| Command | What rtk does to it |
+|---|---|
+| `worktree list --porcelain -z` | discards both flags; no NUL separators, no `locked`/`lock_reason` field at all |
+| `worktree list -v` | abbreviates `/root/…` to `~/…`, collapses column alignment |
+| `branch --list <name>` | emits a phantom `* ` line even on no match |
+| `diff --name-only` / `--name-status` | appends a blank line and a `Changes:` trailer |
+| `diff --word-diff[=color\|=porcelain]` | emits no `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers; substitutes a diffstat |
+| `log -L` | truncates each diff body line at ~72 characters with an ellipsis |
+| `stash pop` (on conflict) | prints only `FAILED: git stash pop`, swallowing `CONFLICT`, `Unmerged paths` and the retained-entry notice |
+| `stash list` (empty) | prints `No stashes` where git prints nothing |
+
+Every one of those falsified a skill that was written against the bare output. `git-worktrees`'s
+Step 2 required `locked` and `lock_reason` from a command whose rtk rendering has never carried
+them; `git-log-format.md` documented `[-removed-] {+added+}` markers beside a command that no longer
+produces them. The two-way split could not see any of this, because both halves of it are about what
+a *sentence* is doing and none of it is about what the *command* does.
+
+**The rule is not `git`-plugin-scoped.** `plugins/git/README.md` claimed the `gitea-*` skills
+"contain no `git`/`rtk` mentions at all". Five `gitea-*` SKILL.md files run `git remote get-url
+origin` in a fenced ```bash Step block — the README's own canonical example of "executable,
+instructed" — plus `git branch --show-current` in a reference file and three `git remote -v` in
+`gitea-orchestrate.agent.md`. A convention stated inside one plugin's README is invisible from the
+plugin next door, which is how those eight sites stayed bare through the sweep that existed to find
+them.
+
+## Decision
+
+**One rule, three clauses, repo-wide** — every `plugins/*/.apm/skills/**` and
+`plugins/*/.apm/agents/**` file, not the `git` plugin alone.
+
+1. **Executable and instructed → `rtk git`.** Anything telling the agent to run a command now: an
+   imperative step, a dispatch-table "Run" cell, a fenced code-block procedure.
+   `rtk git push -u origin <branch>`.
+2. **Illustrative or referential → bare `git`.** Naming a flag's behaviour, quoting a doc's own
+   heading, describing a command in the abstract, warning against an anti-pattern. "`git switch`
+   refuses rather than clobbering conflicting local edits."
+3. **Machine-parsed or interactive → bare `git`, and say why inline.** A command whose output the
+   skill parses, where rtk is in the filtered set above; or a command that hands control to an
+   interactive child process.
+
+Clause 3 is the new one and it looks arbitrary without the table in Context, which is why the
+measurements are recorded here rather than left in a PR thread. It is applied per subcommand and per
+flag, not per skill: `tag --list` stays prefixed because rtk passes it through byte-identically,
+while `branch --list` two words away goes bare because it does not. `git remote get-url origin`,
+`git remote -v`, `git branch --show-current`, `git log --oneline -1` and `git add -u` were all
+re-measured as byte-identical passthroughs and are therefore prefixed, parsing notwithstanding.
+
+Two consequences of that per-subcommand basis are worth stating, because both are load-bearing and
+neither is comfortable:
+
+- **rtk's filtered set is a moving target.** `git rebase` and `git mergetool` are passthroughs on
+  0.42.4 — verified under `script(1)`, both inherit a real TTY, contradicting an earlier report that
+  they did not. They stay bare anyway, on the interactive limb: a token filter has nothing to offer a
+  command that hands control to an editor, and the prefix would only buy exposure to whatever a later
+  rtk version decides to do with those subcommands. The same reasoning makes the *inner* call in
+  `` `rtk git remote add origin-push $(git config remote.origin.url)` `` bare while the outer stays
+  prefixed — `config` passes through cleanly today, but its stdout becomes a remote URL that is then
+  force-pushed to, and that is not a blast radius to lend to a future filter change.
+- **`branch --show-current` sits on the sharp edge.** It is in the filtered set, it is parsed, and it
+  is prefixed — on a measurement, in a subcommand whose sibling `--list` is exactly the defect clause
+  3 exists for. If rtk's `branch` filter is ever extended, that is the first site to break. It is
+  called out rather than hedged, because a rule whose exceptions are unrecorded is the state this ADR
+  is replacing.
+
+**A clause-3 site says so inline, in a few words.** "bare, not `rtk`: rtk prints a phantom `* ` line
+even on no match". Without it the next sweep re-prefixes the command, which is how #113 recurs.
+
+**The rule lives here, and `docs/spec/gates.md` carries the gate.** `plugins/git/README.md` is
+reduced to a pointer. It had also cited `git-workflow/references/hard-rules.md` as a place the rule
+was written down; that file contains no occurrence of "rtk", and the citation is removed rather than
+repaired.
+
+**Clause 1 is enforced by a `check-rtk-prefix` pre-commit hook; clauses 2 and 3 are not enforceable
+and are not gated.** The hook checks the two places a `git` mention is unambiguously an instruction —
+a line in a shell-tagged code fence, and the opening backticked span of a "Run" column cell — and a
+deliberately-bare command opts out with the literal string `ADR-0023` on its own line. Its coverage
+limits are recorded in `docs/spec/gates.md`, not smoothed over.
+
+## Considered options
+
+**Add `compatibility:` frontmatter to every skill.** These six plugins are installable by third
+parties, and a consumer who installs `git` from the marketplace has no `rtk` on their PATH. Every
+prefixed command in the corpus is a plain `git` invocation with a word in front of it, so the prefix
+is *droppable*: delete `rtk ` and the command is correct. A `compatibility:` line per skill would
+state that in a machine-readable field. Rejected on cost. It is 39 lines of frontmatter restating one
+sentence, it is preloaded into every agent's context every session under ADR-0020's budget — the
+field is not free the way a line in a doc is — and it has no consumer: nothing reads
+`compatibility:`, so the field would be a comment with a colon in it. The consumer situation is
+documented here and in `plugins/git/README.md` instead, which is where a human installing a plugin
+actually looks. The same two-line note is owed to the other five plugin READMEs and is not yet
+written.
+
+**Move rtk to the execution layer entirely.** Skills instruct bare `git` throughout; `CLAUDE.md`'s
+session rule handles prefixing at the point of execution. This is the strongest rejected option and
+it deserves the space: it closes the consumer gap and all eight output defects at once, because the
+executing agent knows what it is about to parse and the skill does not have to predict it. It also
+removes clause 3 entirely — there is nothing to except. Rejected because the prefix is lost wherever
+an agent copies a command literally, which is the common case for a fenced procedure block and the
+whole reason dispatch tables exist. The org convention's value is that the prefix is *already there*
+in the text the agent lifts; a rule that relies on the agent remembering to add it is the rule that
+produced the drift in the first place. Worth revisiting if rtk ever ships a shell shim, which would
+make the execution layer transparent and this trade different.
+
+**Keep the two-way split and fix the eight sites by hand.** Rejected: the split has no vocabulary for
+"this command is executable, instructed, and must still be bare", so the eight sites would be
+unexplained exceptions and the next sweep re-prefixes them. That is the failure this ADR exists to
+stop, not a smaller version of it.
+
+**Gate clauses 2 and 3 as well.** Rejected as undecidable. "Run `git switch <branch>`" and "`git
+switch` refuses rather than clobbering local edits" are the same token sequence; separating them is a
+judgement about what a sentence is doing. A gate that guessed would fire on correct content, and a
+gate that fires on correct content gets added to `SKIP`, which disarms clause 1 along with it.
+
+## The boundary the rule does not decide
+
+Two shapes in the corpus resisted the two-way split. The three-clause rule resolves one and does not
+resolve the other; both are recorded so an author meeting a third one knows which kind it is.
+
+**`git-worktrees/SKILL.md`'s tracking row carries both spellings in one Run cell** — `rtk git
+worktree add --track -b <branch> <path> <remote>/<branch>` — always correct. `git worktree add
+<path> <branch>` expands to exactly this. **Resolved: the clauses apply per mention, not per row,
+per cell or per file.** The first is the instruction (clause 1), the second names what the first
+expands to (clause 2), and one table cell can hold one of each. The rule needed no change; the
+*gate* did, and it checks only a Run cell's opening span for exactly this reason.
+
+**`git-submodules/references/setup-and-update.md:80` has a git command inside a quoted argument to
+another command** — `rtk git submodule foreach 'git pull origin main || :'`. **Not resolved: all
+three clauses describe a command the reading agent executes, and the inner `git pull` is not one.**
+It is the literal text of an argument that `git submodule foreach` hands to a subshell running inside
+each submodule's own working tree, where the local convention does not reach. The file already gets
+this right and already justifies it in prose two lines below ("the git calls in it are the
+submodule's own — that is the one place a bare `git` is correct"). **An author meeting this shape
+should do the same: leave the inner command bare and justify it inline.** It is deliberately not
+promoted to a fourth clause on one instance. The gate does not decide it either — it happens to pass
+this line, because the segment containing the inner command begins with `rtk`, and that is an
+accident of the split rather than an understanding of quoting.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Eleven sites in `plugins/git/.apm/skills/**` revert to bare `git` under clause 3, each carrying a
+short inline reason. Eight sites across `plugins/gitea/.apm/skills/**` and
+`plugins/gitea/.apm/agents/gitea-orchestrate.agent.md` gain the prefix under clause 1, and one in
+`pc-run/SKILL.md` that the #130 sweep's grep missed because the backtick opens with `SKIP=` rather
+than `git `. `plugins/git/README.md`'s Conventions section becomes a pointer here, minus a paragraph
+that was false about the `gitea-*` skills and a citation to a file that does not carry the rule.
+A `check-rtk-prefix` pre-commit hook and `tests/test-check-rtk-prefix.sh` land with it; the test runs
+the gate against the pre-sweep corpus on `main` and asserts it fails there, because a gate that only
+passes on the fixed tree proves nothing about the drift it was written for.

docs/notes/factory-integration-decisions.md

@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ All skills — new and rebuilt — must follow this standard:
 - `name:` — matches directory name
 - `description:` — trigger-tested before writing the body (explicit, implicit, negative cases)
 - `metadata: category:` — from the category table above
-
+- `metadata: version:` — mandatory for every skill (ADR-0022)
-`version:`, `updated:`, `when:`, `source:`, and `references:` are provenance/audit fields — they live in `META.md` alongside the SKILL.md (not in frontmatter). See `META-TEMPLATE.md` in `.agents/skills/write-skill/` for the META.md schema.
 
 **Body required sections:**
 - Constraints (highest-ROI element — prevents overengineering)

docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md

@@ -103,21 +103,21 @@ Do not write the SKILL.md until the human has confirmed every section. The synth
 **c. SKILL.md** (sub-agent)
 Once all sections are confirmed, spawn a write agent to produce the SKILL.md using `write-skill` (or hand-write for bootstrap skills). The agent receives: trigger description, per-section decisions from step b, upstream content to incorporate, authoring standard (see below).
 
-**c. META.md — `source:` and `references:` fields**
+**d. Provenance — source and reference records**
-Populate `META.md` after upstream review. Two distinct fields:
+Record provenance after upstream review. Two distinct kinds:
-- `source:` — upstream provenance tracking (repo slug, commit SHA, files adopted with inline comments, updated date). Present only if content was adopted. Absence = self-authored.
+- Upstream provenance (repo slug, commit SHA, files adopted with inline comments, updated date). Present only if content was adopted. Absence = self-authored.
-- `references:` — general citations (research papers, documentation, standard specifications). Present only if the skill cites external research.
+- General citations (research papers, documentation, standard specifications). Present only if the skill cites external research.
 
-Both fields live in `META.md` alongside the SKILL.md — not in frontmatter. See `META-TEMPLATE.md` in `.agents/skills/write-skill/` for the full schema.
+Both are recorded in the skill's own `references/sources.md`, keyed by the `source_keys:` its SKILL.md and reference files declare. `validate-provenance.sh` checks that chain.
 
-**d. eval.yaml** (sub-agent)
+**e. eval.yaml** (sub-agent)
 Invoke `write-eval` in two steps to preserve its confirmation gate:
 1. Sub-agent proposes test cases and returns the plan to the main conversation.
 2. Human confirms the plan; then sub-agent writes the file.
 
 Do not pass pre-designed test cases directly to a write agent — that collapses the plan-then-confirm gate into a single step, bypassing write-eval's own constraint. Co-located at `.agents/evals/<category>/<skill-name>/eval.yaml`. Must contain all five required test types (see Eval schema below).
 
-**e. HITL behavioral test**
+**f. HITL behavioral test**
 Human opens a fresh Claude session, invokes the skill with its trigger phrase, and verifies output. Do not batch more than 2–3 skills before running behavioral tests — output volume must stay within genuine human review capacity. An approval that cannot be meaningfully evaluated is not an approval.
 
 ### Step 6 — Session handoff
@@ -157,12 +157,11 @@ name: skill-name
 description: <trigger description — routing only; written and tested first; max 1024 chars>
 metadata:
   category: <design|factory|implement|test|review|deploy|operate|cross-cutting|iac>
+  version: <semver — mandatory for every skill; see ADR-0022>
 # allowed-tools: <add only when the skill has a narrow, well-defined tool surface; omit otherwise>
 ---
 ```
 
-Frontmatter contains only these fields. `version`, `updated`, `when`, `source`, and `references` are provenance/audit fields — they are not used for routing or runtime execution. They live in `META.md` alongside the SKILL.md, loaded only when needed. See `META-TEMPLATE.md` in `.agents/skills/write-skill/` for the META.md schema.
-
 ### Body sections
 
 Use `.agents/skills/write-skill/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md` as the authoritative structure reference. The template defines the required sections, correct order, XML grouping, and placeholder comments for each section.
@@ -230,6 +229,6 @@ Upstream review happens per-skill during step 2, not once at chunk start.
 
 ## Open decisions carried forward
 
-- **Bidirectional reference convention** — Chunk 4 (reference scanner tooling; reverse map "what files point to X?"). The `when:` field itself is resolved — it lives in `META.md` alongside every skill.
+- **Bidirectional reference convention** — Chunk 4 (reference scanner tooling; reverse map "what files point to X?").
 - **PRD/issue template scope** — refined during `write-prd` (0020) and `write-issue-spec` (0019) implementation
 - **Merging `zoom-out` into architect role** — revisit at Chunk 5 grill

docs/spec/architecture.md

@@ -21,18 +21,33 @@ project repo (local overrides)
 
 Skills are **not** deployed by `install.sh`. They are distributed as plugins and installed separately — in this repo by `apm install` against the `dependencies.apm` entries in the root `apm.yml`, which lands them in `.claude/skills/` and `.claude/agents/` (ADR-0018); elsewhere by `claude plugin install <name>@holocron`.
 
-`~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` is a thin adapter, not a content source. It imports `~/.agents/AGENTS.md` (always-on rules) and `governance.md` (always-on governance), then lists the content index. All always-on content lives in `AGENTS.md` files so other providers can import the same source without duplication.
+`~/.claude/CLAUDE.md` is a thin adapter, not a content source. It imports `~/.agents/AGENTS.md` (always-on rules) and `governance.md` (always-on governance) and carries nothing else — the content index of on-demand instruction files sits in `core/AGENTS.md`, deployed to `~/.agents/AGENTS.md` and imported by it. All always-on content lives in `AGENTS.md` files so other providers can import the same source without duplication.
 
 ## Plugin model
 
-Skills, agents, MCP servers, and hooks are distributed as self-contained plugin units under `plugins/`, installed independently — via `apm install` here, or `claude plugin install <name>@holocron` for a host consuming the marketplace natively (ADR-0018). Each plugin is an **apm package**: `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` plus a hand-authored `plugins/<name>/.apm/{skills,agents,hooks,commands,instructions,extensions}/` tree (ADR-0015). There is no hand-maintained `plugin.json` — every manifest and every host-visible content directory is compiled from that source.
+Skills, agents, MCP servers, and hooks are distributed as self-contained plugin units under `plugins/`, installed independently — via `apm install` here, or `claude plugin install <name>@holocron` for a host consuming the marketplace natively (ADR-0018). Self-contained is a hard constraint, not a description: a plugin is copied to a cache on install, so nothing inside it may reference a file outside its own directory. That is why the Vale styles are duplicated across two skills rather than shared (ADR-0014), and why ADR-0020's constants are copied into three validators rather than sourced from one. Each plugin is an **apm package**: `plugins/<name>/apm.yml` plus a hand-authored `plugins/<name>/.apm/{skills,agents,hooks,commands,instructions,extensions}/` tree (ADR-0015). There is no hand-maintained `plugin.json` — every manifest and every host-visible content directory is compiled from that source.
+
+Which plugin a new skill belongs in follows from what each one is scoped to. The boundary that matters most in practice is `core` vs `kyberforge`: `core` is the home for cross-cutting, repo-agnostic utility skills that a consumer would want against *their* repo, while `kyberforge` is meta-tooling for the holocron marketplace itself. A skill that authors a target repo's `AGENTS.md` is `core`; a skill that audits a `SKILL.md` against this marketplace's contract is `kyberforge`.
+
+The second boundary worth stating is `git` vs `gitea`, because both own things called branches and both touch pull requests: `git` is whatever works over the git wire protocol against a local clone, `gitea` is whatever goes through the forge's HTTP API. That is why `git-branches` and `gitea-branches` both exist and are not duplicates.
+
+These are routing boundaries, not inventories — they answer "where does a new skill go", so they deliberately do not enumerate what each plugin ships today. The plugin's published `description` in its `apm.yml` states the same boundary for a consumer deciding whether to install (ADR-0021); neither carries an inventory. For what a plugin ships today, read `plugins/<name>/.apm/skills/` or the plugin list in `README.md`.
+
+| Plugin | Scope |
+|---|---|
+| `core` | Authoring and auditing a repo's `AGENTS.md` and the provider adapter files that defer to it |
+| `git` | Git operations and git hook tooling — anything driven over the git wire protocol against a local clone, plus the pre-commit hooks that guard it |
+| `gitea` | Anything reached through the Gitea HTTP API rather than the git wire protocol — the forge's own objects |
+| `kyberforge` | Creating and maintaining a Claude Code / Copilot CLI plugin marketplace — this repo's own meta-tooling |
+| `lint` | Configuring and running linters against a target repo; repo-agnostic, first linter is Vale |
+| `bin` | Unsorted skills that have not earned a home yet |
 
 Two compilers produce the plugin roots you see in the tree:
 
 - **`apm pack` compiles the manifests** (ADR-0015). Per plugin: `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` and `.github/plugin/plugin.json`, both generated from `plugins/<name>/apm.yml`. Repo-wide, from the root `apm.yml`'s `marketplace:` block: `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` (apm's `claude` output profile) and `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` (its `codex` profile, a differently-shaped file). Those two are the only marketplace outputs apm has profiles for — the third root manifest, `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` (Copilot CLI's legacy path), is a byte-identical mirror of the Claude one maintained by `scripts/sync-marketplace-mirror.sh` and gated by the `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` pre-push hook.
 - **`scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` compiles the content mirror** (ADR-0017). It wraps `apm pack --format plugin` and copies the resulting bundle's flat `agents/`, `skills/`, `commands/`, `instructions/`, `extensions/`, and merged `hooks/hooks.json` back to the plugin root. Claude Code's installer convention-scans those flat paths and has no `.apm/` awareness whatsoever, so the mirror exists solely to satisfy the host's discovery contract.
 
-`.apm/` is the sole hand-edited authoring source for plugin content. An edit made in the flat mirror is discarded by the next sync and is reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook. Hand-authored material that is not an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json`, and per-plugin extras such as `plugins/git/config.example.json`, `plugins/gitea/references/` and `plugins/bin/evals/` — lives at the plugin **root** and is untouched by either compiler.
+`.apm/` is the sole hand-edited authoring source for plugin content. An edit made in the flat mirror is discarded by the next sync and is reported as drift by the `check-plugin-content-sync` pre-push hook. Hand-authored material that is not an `.apm/` primitive — `README.md`, `docs/`, `bin/`, `sources.md`, `.mcp.json`, and per-plugin extras such as `plugins/gitea/references/` and `plugins/bin/evals/` — lives at the plugin **root** and is untouched by either compiler.
 
 That immunity is positional, not by filename. Anything placed *inside* a mirrored directory is destroyed regardless of what it is: `sync_dir` runs `rm -rf "$dst"` before every copy, and `sync_hooks_json` does the same to `hooks/`. A hand-written `README.md` under `plugins/<name>/hooks/` or `plugins/<name>/skills/` is deleted by the next sync with no drift report, because a file with no `.apm/` counterpart is simply absent from the regenerated tree. This has already cost the repo one document — `plugins/kyberforge/hooks/README.md`, since restored to `plugins/kyberforge/docs/hooks.md`. Plugin-root documentation belongs in `docs/`.
 
@@ -40,6 +55,8 @@ That immunity is positional, not by filename. Anything placed *inside* a mirrore
 
 `core/instructions/governance.md` is the always-on governance instruction file. Unlike the on-demand instruction files in the content index, governance.md is loaded into every Claude session via `@import` in `providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md`. This is a technical guarantee, not a behavioural instruction — `@import` causes Claude Code to expand and load the file at launch, before any interaction begins.
 
+Those on-demand files are plain markdown — no frontmatter, no schema. The agent decides when to read each one from task context and the content index label alone. Frontmatter is deferred until there is evidence that agents are loading the wrong files in practice; it is a deliberate deferral, not an oversight to close.
+
 The governance layer has two phases:
 - **Phase 1** (complete): instruction and documentation layer — `governance.md` loaded via `@import`; `docs/ai-constitution.md` and `docs/wiki/HUMANS.md` as human-facing reference; `CONTEXT.md` extended with governance domain language.
 - **Phase 2** (planned): deterministic enforcement layer — pre-commit hooks, CI gates, secret scanning, licence scanning. Specified in `docs/research/governance_principles/CONTROLS.md`.
@@ -57,10 +74,14 @@ This repo also has a `CLAUDE.md` at its root — the Claude Code entry point for
 
 `CONTEXT.md` is therefore **not** always-loaded. `AGENTS.md` instructs agents to read it at session start, which is a behavioural instruction, not an `@import` guarantee — `LESSONS.md`'s 2026-05-17 entry proposed adding the import and it was never applied. Treat that entry as open work rather than a record of a landed change.
 
+## Reference conventions
+
+The stated convention is that files referencing other files declare those references explicitly: the referencing file carries the forward reference (the content index in `core/AGENTS.md`, `references:` in frontmatter), the referenced file carries a `when:` field describing when it is loaded, and divergence between the two signals staleness. It is aspirational, not a description of the repo today — no file under `core/instructions/` carries frontmatter at all, `when:` appears in exactly one of the 39 `SKILL.md` sources under `plugins/*/.apm/skills/`, and the reference scanner script meant to derive the reverse map ("what files reference this file?") does not exist; `docs/notes/skill-implementation-workflow.md` still lists it as unbuilt work. Treat it as intent for instruction files, skills, and workflow documents, not as a rule the repo enforces.
+
 ## Provider model
 
 `core/` is never tool-specific. `providers/` is never shared. When adding a new provider, write an adapter in `providers/<name>/` that translates core content into the tool's expected format and location. The core content itself does not change.
 
 ## Architectural decisions
 
-Key hard-to-reverse decisions are recorded as ADRs in `docs/adr/`. There is no index file — the directory holds 19 numbered ADRs whose filenames state their decision, so `ls docs/adr/` is the index. Read a superseding ADR before the one it supersedes: ADR-0015 (apm as the authoring source of truth) supersedes ADR-0001 and moots ADR-0006, ADR-0017 corrects ADR-0015's host-discovery gap, and ADR-0019 supersedes one claim in ADR-0018 (that `.claude/settings.json`'s committed content is exactly `{"hooks": {}}`) while keeping the rule behind it. Entry points for the structure described on this page: ADR-0002 (two-tier CLAUDE.md), ADR-0003 (AGENTS.md as the provider-agnostic entry point), ADR-0015 and ADR-0017 (the two compilers behind the plugin roots).
+Key hard-to-reverse decisions are recorded as ADRs in `docs/adr/`. There is no index file — the directory holds numbered ADRs whose filenames state their decision, so `ls docs/adr/` is the index. Read a superseding ADR before the one it supersedes: ADR-0015 (apm as the authoring source of truth) supersedes ADR-0001 and moots ADR-0006, ADR-0017 corrects ADR-0015's host-discovery gap, and ADR-0019 supersedes one claim in ADR-0018 (that `.claude/settings.json`'s committed content is exactly `{"hooks": {}}`) while keeping the rule behind it. Entry points for the structure described on this page: ADR-0002 (two-tier CLAUDE.md), ADR-0003 (AGENTS.md as the provider-agnostic entry point), ADR-0015 and ADR-0017 (the two compilers behind the plugin roots).

docs/spec/gates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,966 @@
+# Enforcement gates
+
+Reference for this repo's pre-commit and pre-push hooks: what each one guards, what its numbers
+mean, and which shapes were tried and rejected. Read it when a gate fails, before changing anything
+in `.pre-commit-config.yaml`, or before "fixing" something that looks like an inconsistency — several
+of the oddities documented here are load-bearing and have already been re-litigated once.
+
+`AGENTS.md` carries only the operative rules an agent needs in the moment. The reasoning lives here.
+
+---
+
+## Running the gates
+
+| Command | Scope |
+|---|---|
+| `pre-commit run --all-files` | the commit-stage hooks |
+| `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push --all-files` | the push gate, one command — with one caveat below |
+| `pre-commit run skill-size-check --all-files` | just the ADR-0020 size/context gates |
+
+Install hooks via `pc-run`, wiring **all three stages**. This repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` has no
+`default_install_hook_types`, so a plain install silently skips `commit-msg` (Conventional Commits)
+and `pre-push` (everything below).
+
+The pre-push command reports **15** hooks, not 13. The extra two are pre-commit's own `meta` hooks,
+`check-hooks-apply` and `check-useless-excludes`: they declare no `stages:`, so they run at every
+stage including this one. Both are declared in this repo's `.pre-commit-config.yaml` like everything
+else — what separates them is `repo: meta` (pre-commit's own built-ins) from `repo: local`. Thirteen
+is the count of hooks this repo authors itself.
+
+**The caveat: one of those 13 is a silent no-op under that invocation.**
+`check-release-needed` exits 0 immediately unless `PRE_COMMIT_REMOTE_BRANCH` equals
+`refs/heads/main`, and pre-commit exports that variable only from the real pre-push git hook during
+an actual `git push`. Running the stage by hand — or from a CI runner — therefore reports it
+`Passed` having checked nothing. That is by design for feature branches — pushing WIP must not be
+blocked on cutting a premature tag — but it means `--hook-stage pre-push --all-files` is a full
+rehearsal of 12 hooks and a skip of the thirteenth. The script's own header records the same gap for
+a PR merged through Gitea's merge button, where no local push happens at all.
+
+## The pre-push gate
+
+Thirteen hooks, grouped below by what they guard rather than by the order `.pre-commit-config.yaml` declares them in.
+
+**Core checks**
+
+| Hook | Guards |
+|---|---|
+| `run-tests` | `bash tests/run-tests.sh --strict` — the whole suite, skips fatal (see [Tests](#tests)) |
+
+**Generated-content drift gates**
+
+| Hook | Guards |
+|---|---|
+| `check-plugin-content-sync` | each plugin's flat `skills/agents/commands/hooks` mirror matches `.apm/` (issue #90) |
+| `check-marketplace-mirror-sync` | `.github/plugin/marketplace.json` is byte-identical to `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` — no apm output profile targets that path |
+| `check-vale-style-sync` | skill-audit's Vale copy matches agent-audit's canonical copy, plus six glob-coverage probes (see [Vale](#vale)) |
+| `check-scope-walkup-sync` | `validate.sh`, `validate-provenance.sh`, `new-agent.sh` and `new-skill.sh`'s four independent `$HOME`/`.git`/`apm.yml` walk-up ports still agree behaviorally |
+| `check-executables-allow-sync` | root `apm.yml`'s `executables.allow` key names kyberforge's actual version (see [apm gates](#apm-gates)) |
+
+`check-executables-allow-sync` is the odd one in this group: it guards a *silent failure* rather than
+drift in generated text.
+
+**Artifact validators**
+
+| Hook | Guards |
+|---|---|
+| `check-apm-agents-valid` | runs agent-audit's `validate.sh` over every real `plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md` (see [Agent files](#agent-files-take-the-description-gates-not-the-body-gate)) |
+
+**apm's own gates**
+
+| Hook | Guards |
+|---|---|
+| `apm-marketplace-check` | every `marketplace.packages[]` entry resolves, including network reachability of remote refs |
+| `apm-audit-ci` | `apm audit --ci` once per manifest — root plus each of the six plugin packages |
+| `apm-pack-check-clean` | `apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run` — the compiled marketplace still matches what `apm.yml` + `.apm/` would generate, and per-package versions agree with the `per_package` strategy |
+
+**Host validators** (both need the `claude` CLI on PATH)
+
+| Hook | Guards |
+|---|---|
+| `validate-plugins` | `claude plugin validate --strict` on every plugin directory |
+| `validate-marketplace` | `claude plugin validate --strict` on the root marketplace manifest |
+
+**Release**
+
+| Hook | Guards |
+|---|---|
+| `check-release-needed` | on a real `git push` to `main` only — fails if files exposed via `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` changed since the last tag. A no-op everywhere else, including under `pre-commit run --hook-stage pre-push` (see [the caveat above](#running-the-gates)) |
+
+Four of these shell out to `apm`: `apm-marketplace-check`, `apm-audit-ci`, `apm-pack-check-clean`,
+and `check-plugin-content-sync` (via `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh`, which wraps `apm pack`). The
+first and third are bare `apm …` entries and the second is a `bash -c` loop calling `apm` once per
+package, so without the CLI the push dies with an unhelpful "command not found". Install with
+`apm-install`, or `curl -sSL https://aka.ms/apm-unix | sh`; verify with `apm --version`. `jq` is
+needed by `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` — it at least fails loudly (`Error: jq is required but
+not installed`).
+
+## Skill and agent context gates (ADR-0020)
+
+The `skill-size-check` pre-commit hook, scoped to `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$`,
+runs `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`. It is also shipped to external repos as
+`kyberforge-skill-size-check` (see
+[External consumers](#external-consumers-the-root-pre-commit-hooksyaml)). Besides the ADR-0020
+gates below, it also asserts required frontmatter is present: `name`, a non-empty `description`, and
+a `metadata.version` matching three-part semver (`1.0.0`) — folded in from a formerly standalone
+`skill-frontmatter` hook that parsed the same fields with a shell script.
+
+**Two things fall outside that scope, both deliberately.** The `[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` tail admits only a
+`SKILL.md` sitting directly in a skill directory under `.apm/skills/`:
+
+- the `plugins/kyberforge/docs/research/examples/` reference skills, which are vendored upstream
+  corpus and not this repo's to gate;
+- `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/skill-author/assets/templates/SKILL.md` — inside `.apm/skills/`,
+  but two directories deeper. It is the `FILL IN:` scaffold `skill-author` copies, so its
+  `description: >` is a comment block rather than a description and every ADR-0020 measurement over
+  it would be meaningless. A reader adjusting the pattern needs to know it is there.
+
+Everything else it matches exactly, with nothing over- or under-caught. Re-derive both halves:
+
+```
+git ls-files | grep -cE '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$'          # the real skills
+git ls-files | grep -E '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/.*SKILL\.md$' \
+             | grep -vE '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$'          # the scaffold only
+```
+
+The first count equals the number of skill directories (`ls -d plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/ | wc -l`);
+the second returns exactly the template. The remaining unmatched `SKILL.md` files in the tree are the
+generated flat mirror, which is excluded by the `.apm/` segment on purpose — a mirror edit is drift,
+not an authoring change.
+
+### Two independent gate families, neither replaced the other
+
+**Family 1 — agentskills.io spec backstop** (unchanged, conformance not quality):
+
+| Constant | Value | Measured over |
+|---|---|---|
+| `MAX_LINES` | 500 | whole file, **frontmatter included** |
+| `MAX_WORDS` | 2,770 | whole file, **frontmatter included** |
+
+**Family 2 — ADR-0020 context budget** (measured differently, on purpose):
+
+| Check | SUGGESTION | FAIL | Measured over |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| `description` characters | 250 | 400 | the YAML-**folded** value |
+| body words | 600 | 900 | **body only** — everything after the frontmatter's closing `---` |
+
+Plus two hard FAILs with no suggestion tier:
+
+- **A missing, valueless or `null` `description:`.** Not a skip. The description is the one field
+  preloaded into every session, so a gate that declines to measure it reports green. (This is not
+  hypothetical: `description:` with no value followed by `model: sonnet` let a line regex capture the
+  *next* key, which looked non-empty, so the "missing or empty" branch never fired and every gate
+  below early-returned on the genuinely empty folded value — exit 0, zero output, on a blocking gate.)
+- **Every `references/<file>.md` a body names must exist** on disk. A dispatch table pointing at a
+  file that was never written is a silently dead branch, and nothing else in the gate/audit/vale
+  stack notices it.
+
+A file can sit well inside one family and fail the other. 2,770 whole-file words is a conformance
+backstop; 900 body-only words is a quality gate. Conflating them is what produced the current state.
+
+### An unresolved routing target is not automatically a FAIL
+
+A boundary-clause target that resolves to no skill or agent has **three** possible verdicts, not one
+(`unresolved_targets()` in `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`):
+
+| Verdict | When |
+|---|---|
+| **SUGGESTION** — the default | the target does not resolve and neither promotion condition below holds |
+| **blocking ERROR** | the target is written in **route notation** — `/name` for any name, or any arrow form (a bare `-> name` only when the name is hyphenated, a backticked `` -> `name` `` for any — see the gap below); **or** it is a bare **terminal** name (not a compound modifier) **corroborated** by another target in the same sentence that *does* resolve |
+| **INFO, "DID NOT RUN"** | no skill universe could be determined for the path at all — the targets are named and left unchecked, exit 0 |
+
+The default is deliberately soft because a hyphenated word in a boundary clause is as likely to be a
+tool, a file format or an English compound as a route: "pre-commit hooks" is prose about a tool and
+never reaches the check at all, being a compound modifier rather than a terminal name. The
+SUGGESTION text says how to opt in — write it as `/name` or `-> name` and it gets checked properly.
+
+**The two promotion conditions are not symmetric, and the order matters.** `_add()` decides
+**notation first**: when the name is written `/name`, or reached through any arrow form, the target
+is marked error-eligible there and the terminal test is never run. Terminality gates only the *bare*
+path — a name in prose earns its error from corroboration, and a compound modifier can never dangle.
+Reading the row as "terminal AND (notation OR corroborated)" gets the notation half backwards: it
+predicts that `` … Do not use for Y — use /no-such-skill afterwards. `` is a SUGGESTION, because
+`afterwards` is a follower outside `FOLLOWER_OK`. It exits 1. That was the defect — `-> name` reached
+`_add()` with `strict=True` from both its call sites and `/name` did not, so the one spelling
+ADR-0020 offers an author who wants a route checked unconditionally was the one spelling a stray
+follower could silence.
+
+**Known gap: a BARE arrow target must be hyphenated.** Target extraction is built on `NAME_HYPH` in
+`scripts/skill-size-check.sh`, which requires at least one hyphen, and `ARROW_BOUNDARY` inherits
+that. So `Not X -> gitea-prs` is extracted and checked, while `Not X -> triage` yields no target.
+The exclusion is deliberate, not an oversight: `research`, `triage`, `forge`, `prototype` and `tdd`
+are all real skill names *and* ordinary English, so a bare single-word rule would flag most of the
+corpus. The marked spellings carry no such restriction — `` `triage` `` and `/triage` are both
+extracted — and are the forms to prefer. **Both arrow spellings are recognised:** `ARROW_MARKED`,
+`ARROW_BOUNDARY` and `BOUNDARY_ARROW` are each built from `(?:->|→)`, so the unicode arrow `→`
+behaves exactly like `->` in every case below. Cite these constants by symbol name, never by line
+number: the script moves often enough that a pinned line lands a reader in an unrelated comment
+block and reads as plausible.
+
+**The gap is no longer silent.** It used to be exactly that — no ERROR, no SUGGESTION, exit 0 — which
+made the dangling-target SUGGESTION's own advice unsafe for a single-word skill: taking it silenced
+the finding instead of checking it. `boundary_clause_status()` now separates the case out and
+reports it as `unparsed` (see below), naming the parse failure and the two spellings that fix it.
+The target is still not *resolved*; the author is now told so rather than left with a green gate.
+`tests/test-adr0020-targets.sh` covers both directions (`arrow-single-word-target` and the silent
+control `arrow-single-word-marked`).
+
+Corroboration is what makes the soft default safe: a sentence whose *other* target resolves is
+demonstrably a routing sentence, so a sibling that does not resolve is a typo rather than a noun, and
+gets promoted.
+
+### Target resolution walk
+
+Resolution walks up **from the file being checked** — never from the script's own location. Deriving
+it from `${BASH_SOURCE}` leaked holocron's 39-skill universe into every consumer repo running the
+hook through pre-commit, so a consumer skill routing to `skill-audit` resolved against a plugin it
+had never installed.
+
+The walk finds an **authoring root**: the nearest ancestor holding `plugins/*/.apm/skills` or
+`plugins/*/.apm/agents`, falling back to the nearest ancestor holding `.git`. **Two passes, not one
+interleaved walk**, so a nested `.git` (a submodule, a sub-package worktree) cannot beat a real
+monorepo root further up.
+
+The universe is then:
+
+1. every skill and agent under `<root>/plugins/*/` — sibling plugins resolve, which is what a
+   monorepo means;
+2. the checked file's own apm package;
+3. the packages that package declares in **its own** `apm.yml` `dependencies.apm`.
+
+The **root** manifest's `dependencies:` block is not read, and no plugin here declares a cross-plugin
+apm dependency — none needs to.
+
+Deployed `.claude/` / `.agents/` trees are consulted **only** when the walk found no plugin monorepo
+root, whether it landed on a bare `.git` ancestor or on nothing at all. That is the consumer case.
+
+**The gate keys on which of the two passes matched, never on whether the root contributed a new
+name.** A name-count delta looks equivalent and is not: `_collect_authoring_root()` re-collects the
+checked file's own plugin, whose names the earlier steps already added, so a single-plugin monorepo
+shows a delta of zero and would wrongly reach for the deployed trees — including the user's global
+`~/.claude/skills`, making the verdict depend on what happens to be installed.
+
+Why it matters: those trees are gitignored `apm install` output, present only on a machine that has
+run it. Four cross-plugin targets here (`gitea-branches` → `git-branches`, `gitea-branches` →
+`git-history`, `gitea-issues` → `git-branches`, `gitea-workflow` → `git-workflow`) once resolved
+through `.claude/skills/` alone, so **the same commit measured 2 dangling targets on a developer
+machine and 6 on a fresh clone**. A gate shipping hot with no baseline cannot give two answers.
+
+Verified fixed: running the hook over a tree holding only `plugins/` and the root `apm.yml`, with no
+`.claude/` or `.agents/` anywhere, produced findings identical to the working tree. The figures that
+reproduction recorded — 26 description FAILs, 9 body FAILs, 2 dangling targets, 0 missing references
+— are the pre-retrofit corpus as it stood when the experiment was run, kept here as the evidence for
+the install-independence claim. They are not current: the retrofit under #99 took the first three to
+zero. What the experiment establishes is that the two trees agree, not what either measured.
+
+### Boundary-clause detection: three outcomes, not two
+
+`boundary_clause_status()` returns one of three values, and the two findings get separate messages:
+
+| Status | When | Reported as |
+|---|---|---|
+| `present` | a prose marker (`do not`, `instead`, `rather than`, `not for`) or an arrow clause was found | nothing |
+| `absent` | neither was found | SUGGESTION: add a boundary clause, in either form |
+| `unparsed` | an arrow clause was found and **no target could be read out of it** | SUGGESTION: the clause is present — this is a *parse* failure, not a missing clause |
+
+The third had to be split out. Collapsing it into `absent` is a **wrong** finding, not a strict one:
+it sends the author to add a clause that is already there. Three of them instead reworded a correct
+clause until the regex accepted it, one stripping the very filename that discriminates the skill
+from its neighbour (**#110**).
+
+`unparsed` is narrow and certain on purpose. It fires only on the arrow form, which *always* names a
+target, so zero targets means the name is written in a shape the extractor cannot see — in practice
+a bare single-word target, per the known gap above, and the message says to write it `` `name` `` or
+`/name`. A **prose** clause yielding no target is not reported at all: "Do not use for anything else"
+is a complete and legitimate boundary clause that names nowhere to go.
+
+**One arrow, one target.** An arrow clause naming two or more targets draws its own SUGGESTION,
+quoting both names and asking for a split, because only the first is ever resolved: the conjunction
+continuation (`CONT_MARKED` / `CONT_ANY`) is wired to the prose route verbs and never to arrows. So
+`Not X -> a or b` resolved `a`, left `b` resolved by nothing and reported by nothing, and then let
+the audit print "1 of 1 boundary target(s) resolve" on a clause naming two — a gate under-reporting
+its own coverage, which is the one failure mode ADR-0020 says a gate must not have (**#107**). The
+clause is **rejected rather than the arrow scan extended**: extending it would widen the resolver's
+deliberately conservative false-positive tuning across every arrow in the corpus, where splitting
+costs the author one full stop. The convention is one arrow per target — `Not X -> a. Not Y -> b.` —
+already what every retrofitted `gitea-*` skill does in practice, now stated in
+`skill-author`'s `references/contract.md` instead of being folklore.
+
+**Dotted filenames in a boundary clause now parse.** `CLAUSE_BODY` — what may sit between `Not` and
+the arrow — used to be `[^.;]`, a class that cannot cross a `.`, so every clause naming a dotted
+filename between the two (`AGENTS.md`, `.vale.ini`, `.pre-commit-config.yaml`) was invisible to both
+`BOUNDARY_ARROW` and `ARROW_BOUNDARY`. The two resulting failures were different sizes (**#110**):
+
+- with a **backticked** target the clause was *misdiagnosed*. The backtick sweep still extracted the
+  target, so the route was checked, but the gate reported "no boundary clause" on a clause that was
+  present and working. That is the misdiagnosis the three rewordings above came from.
+- with a **bare** target the clause was *unchecked*. `ARROW_BOUNDARY` is the only extractor for a
+  bare arrow target, so `Not AGENTS.md -> no-such-skill` produced no target, no dangling report and
+  no missing-clause SUGGESTION. Silence, not noise — the worse of the two.
+
+`CLAUSE_BODY` is now `(?:[^.;]|\.(?=\S))`: a dot inside a filename is followed by a non-space, a
+sentence-ending dot by whitespace or end of string, so the class crosses `AGENTS.md` and still stops
+at a real sentence end. **Read the second bullet forward as well as back:** a bare target sitting
+after a dotted filename is now extracted, resolved, and a blocking ERROR when it dangles, where the
+same clause used to pass unchecked in silence.
+
+### SUGGESTION-only checks
+
+Deterministic to measure, judgment to act on:
+
+- a description with **no boundary clause at all** (`absent`);
+- an **arrow clause whose target could not be read** (`unparsed`);
+- an **arrow clause naming more than one target**;
+- a `## Gotchas` section with **more than five entries**;
+- a `## Gotchas` section over **25% of the body**.
+
+### Hand-invoked skills are exempt from the routing rules, and only those
+
+A skill or agent whose frontmatter carries `disable-model-invocation: true` skips three checks:
+
+- the boundary-clause check, `absent` and `unparsed` alike;
+- the multi-target arrow check;
+- the 250-character description **target** (`hand_invoked()` in `scripts/skill-size-check.sh`).
+
+It keeps the 400-character description FAIL and **both** body word tiers, and if its description
+does happen to name a target, that target is still resolved and can still dangle.
+
+Why the exemption is right: `disable-model-invocation: true` removes the skill from the
+model-visible listing entirely — it is not preloaded, and the Skill tool refuses to call it — so its
+description is never matched against user intent. ADR-0020 and `skill-author`'s contract therefore
+give such a skill **one plain human-facing sentence**: no trigger list, no boundary clause. No
+validator knew the field existed (**#108**), so the boundary-clause SUGGESTION fired on exactly the
+shape the contract mandates, and its remedy — "so the router knows where NOT to send this skill" —
+was addressed to a router that cannot see the skill at all. An author who followed the advice made
+the file worse. There is no router to inform.
+
+The half that does **not** lift is the point. The body is still loaded on invocation and still
+competes with the caller's live conversation, so neither body tier moves. The 400-character ceiling
+stands too: a hand-invoked description is not preloaded, but it is still the one line the user reads
+when choosing from the `/` menu, and that ceiling is an outlier stop rather than a routing-quality
+budget — which is precisely why the 250-character target is the tier that lifts.
+
+The field is read as a **boolean**, not as a mention of the key. PyYAML already resolves the
+unquoted YAML 1.1 booleans, so the extra handling catches a quoted `"true"`, which a host reads as
+truthy; `disable-model-invocation: false` is the model-invoked case written out longhand and buys
+nothing. A frontmatter parse failure returns false rather than raising — the flag is a *modifier* on
+other checks, and `description_value()` on the same text already reports the broken frontmatter, so
+raising here would diagnose one file twice two different ways.
+
+`caveman` and `zoom-out` are the two carriers here. `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh` pins both
+halves — what the carve-out lifts, each with a flag-removed control, and what it must not.
+
+### `verbose: true` is load-bearing
+
+The hook is declared `verbose: true` so the SUGGESTION tier is audible. pre-commit prints nothing at
+all for a passing hook, and a SUGGESTION deliberately does not fail — without verbose every
+suggestion is swallowed, which is exactly the invisibility ADR-0013 records for Vale warnings.
+ADR-0020's preload arithmetic depends on it: writing to the 400-char FAIL delivers roughly half the
+cut that writing to the 250-char SUGGESTION does, so the intended saving depends entirely on that
+tier being visible. The numbers, and the measurement method behind them, are not restated here —
+they live in ADR-0020's Consequences section, under "A ceiling does not produce an average", whose
+figures are pinned to the base commit the decision was taken on (`f9b919d`). Quoting them here would
+just create a second copy to go stale. It costs nothing on a clean file — the script prints only
+findings.
+
+### Duplicated constants
+
+`skill-audit`'s `validate.sh` holds a second copy of the four ADR-0020 constants
+(`DESC_SUGGEST_CHARS` / `DESC_MAX_CHARS` / `BODY_SUGGEST_WORDS` / `BODY_MAX_WORDS`), and
+`agent-audit`'s `validate.sh` holds a third copy of the two description constants. They are copied
+rather than imported because a cache-installed plugin's scripts cannot read files outside their own
+plugin directory. `tests/test-skill-size-check.sh` asserts the copies agree, so drift fails CI rather
+than silently letting an audit bless a skill the commit hook then rejects. The shared boundary
+resolver block is embedded verbatim in all three scripts between `BEGIN`/`END ADR-0020 SHARED
+BOUNDARY RESOLVER` markers and must stay byte-identical.
+
+### `python3` and PyYAML are hard requirements
+
+Both, and neither is a best-effort accelerator.
+
+`python3` because the script measures the **folded** `description` value. Most descriptions here are
+`>`-block scalars, so a regex over the raw lines measures indentation and newlines instead of the
+value. Missing it fails the hook with an install pointer rather than skipping the ADR-0020 checks,
+which would be a vacuous green. In practice it is already present — pre-commit is itself a Python
+application.
+
+**PyYAML** because the hand-rolled fallback frontmatter reader has been **removed deliberately**. It
+disagreed with a real parser across the FAIL boundary — one corpus description measured 270
+characters parsed and 412 unparsed — and a quoted `"description"` key or an explicit
+`description: null` returned empty from it, silently skipping the description *and* routing checks. A
+reader that mis-parses an unfamiliar scalar shape reports a clean pass on a file it never measured,
+which is the exact vacuous-green failure the `python3` check exists to avoid. `pip install pyyaml`
+(or `python3 -m pip install PyYAML`, or the distro's `python3-yaml`) if the hook reports it missing.
+
+**Neither requirement generalises to every hook in this repo.** `check-rtk-prefix` needs `python3`
+but **not** PyYAML: it reads the markdown body and never touches frontmatter, so it has no scalar to
+fold.
+
+## Agent files take the description gates, not the body gate
+
+`check-apm-agents-valid` runs agent-audit's `validate.sh` over every real
+`plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md`. It derives its expected file set from `git ls-files` — the pattern
+`tests/run-bats.sh` established — so an agent file deleted from the worktree but still tracked fails
+the run, and **discovering zero agent files is an error, not a pass**. An untracked *new* agent file
+is still validated: the derivation is one-directional on purpose, so uncommitted work is not blocked
+but also cannot bypass the gate.
+
+The hook exists because `validate.sh` was previously exercised only by `check-scope-walkup-sync`,
+against synthetic `mktemp` fixtures — it had never run against the agent files it governs. That is
+how ADR-0016 could be amended to bless a `disallowedTools` frontmatter field while `validate.sh`'s
+allowlist still rejected it: spec and enforcer disagreed and every gate stayed green.
+
+Agents take the ADR-0020 **description** gates (agent-audit's `validate.sh` holds its own copy of
+those two constants) and, deliberately, **no body word gate**. A skill body is loaded into the
+caller's context and competes with the live conversation; an agent body becomes the system prompt of
+a *fresh* context. The rationale for the 900-word FAIL does not transfer. A bats test pins that
+absence in agent-audit's validator — adding a body gate there contradicts the ADR rather than fixing
+an inconsistency.
+
+**Be precise about the scope of that guarantee: it holds for the *validator*, not for the shared
+script.** `scripts/skill-size-check.sh` applies its body gate to whatever path it is handed, and
+
+```
+bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/agents/*.agent.md
+```
+
+exits 1 today with 900-word body FAILs on `git-orchestrate` and `gitea-orchestrate`. (Counts are
+deliberately not pinned here — agent bodies are edited like any other file, and a figure in this
+paragraph goes stale the moment one is trimmed. Run the command.) Agent files escape only because
+the hook definitions filter on `SKILL.md`
+— a file-pattern accident that happens to implement the design, not the design itself. **Do not
+"extend" that hook's `files:` pattern to cover agents** on the assumption that the script already
+knows the difference; doing so silently enforces a gate ADR-0020 declines to set.
+
+## Current retrofit status
+
+**The ADR-0020 gates ship hot, with no baseline file.** A shrinking baseline recording each
+non-compliant skill's current numbers was considered and rejected in favour of hot gates.
+
+**The corpus is now clean on both gates.** Issue **#99** retrofitted all 39 skills plugin by plugin;
+`kyberforge` was the last wave, after which the corpus was swept as a whole rather than per plugin.
+Each sweep is followed by an **independent review round**: a fresh agent with no memory of the
+retrofit re-measures the corpus and files what it finds, and the round repeats until one lands no
+findings. The rounds are recorded as comments on **#99** — read the current state off that thread,
+which is why no round count is pinned here.
+
+| Gate | Current findings |
+|---|---|
+| `skill-size-check` | **0 of 39** descriptions and **0 of 39** bodies exceed their FAIL tier; 0 dangling targets; SUGGESTIONs outstanding (count not pinned — see below) |
+| `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` (Vale) | **0 errors** — the four `gitea-*` carriers were all retrofitted |
+
+**The SUGGESTION count is deliberately not recorded here.** It moves with every skill edit *and*
+with every change to the gate's own tiering, so any figure written down is stale by the next commit.
+Measure it instead:
+
+```
+bash scripts/skill-size-check.sh plugins/*/.apm/skills/*/SKILL.md | grep -c '^SUGGESTION'
+pre-commit run skill-size-check --all-files    # same findings, via the hook
+```
+
+A non-zero count is the expected steady state, not a regression. SUGGESTIONs exit 0 and block
+nothing; only the two FAIL tiers, the dangling-target ERROR and the missing-`references/` ERROR do.
+Read the count as a work queue, and the FAIL columns above as the gate.
+
+`Kyberforge.CompositionNote` is the ADR-0020 Vale rule banning composition and architecture prose
+from a description. Every Vale rule here is `level: error` with no ignorable tier, so a description
+that reintroduces one blocks the commit even though no skill carries one today.
+
+Because nothing is grandfathered, the gates now bite on **first commit**: a new skill, or an edit
+that pushes a description past 400 characters or a body past 900 words, is blocked until it
+complies. That is the steady state the retrofit was for — it is no longer true that an unrelated
+one-line fix to a skill requires retrofitting that skill first.
+
+Check where a skill stands before starting, and check **both** gates:
+
+```
+pre-commit run skill-size-check --all-files   # size/context only
+pre-commit run --all-files                    # size AND Vale
+```
+
+Scoping a retrofit off `skill-size-check` output alone leaves you blocked at the second gate.
+
+## The `rtk` prefix gate (ADR-0023)
+
+`check-rtk-prefix` is a `repo: local` pre-commit hook running `scripts/check-rtk-prefix.sh` over
+`^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/(skills/.*\.md|agents/.*\.agent\.md)$`, with `README.md` excluded. It enforces
+**ADR-0023 clause 1 and nothing else**: an executable, instructed local git command in plugin skill
+or agent content is written `rtk git`.
+
+It is wider in file scope than the ADR-0020 hooks — every markdown file under a plugin's
+`.apm/skills/` and `.apm/agents/`, not `SKILL.md` alone — because the rule it enforces is about
+commands an agent runs, and most of those live in `references/`, which the ADR-0020 gates do not
+reach ([the `references/` blind spot](#the-blind-spot-references-is-unlinted-for-two-independent-reasons)).
+
+### What it can decide, and what it declines to
+
+ADR-0023 has three clauses and only the first is a pattern:
+
+| Clause | Rule | Gated |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 | executable + instructed → `rtk git` | yes |
+| 2 | illustrative / referential → bare `git` | no — undecidable |
+| 3 | machine-parsed or interactive → bare `git` | no — opt-out marker |
+
+Clause 2 is a judgement about what a sentence is *doing*. "Run `git switch <branch>`" and "`git
+switch` refuses rather than clobbering local edits" are the same token sequence. A gate that guessed
+would fire on correct prose, and **a gate that fires on correct content gets added to `SKIP`** —
+which disarms clause 1 along with it. So the hook looks only at the two contexts where a `git`
+mention is unambiguously an instruction to execute:
+
+- a line inside a fenced code block whose info string names a shell — `bash`, `sh`, `shell`, `zsh`,
+  `console`, `shell-session`. Fences tagged `text`, `yaml`, `json`, or tagged with nothing, are **not**
+  checked;
+- the **opening** backticked span of a "Run" column cell in a markdown dispatch table, and only the
+  opening span.
+
+That last narrowing is not fussiness. A Run cell routinely carries a command followed by prose about
+it, and the prose is clause 2. `git-worktrees/SKILL.md` has both shapes on adjacent rows — one cell
+reading `` `rtk git worktree add --track …` `` — always correct. `` `git worktree add <path>
+<branch>` `` expands to exactly this (instruction, then reference), and a `**Never** …` row whose Run
+cell is entirely explanation containing a bare `git push`. Checking every backticked span flags both;
+checking only a leading span flags neither, and still catches the ordinary
+`` | List | `git worktree list -v` | `` case the gate exists for.
+
+### The clause-3 opt-out
+
+A command that is deliberately bare — because rtk rewrites the output the skill parses, or because
+the command is interactive — is exempted by putting the literal string `ADR-0023` **on the same
+line**: in a shell comment for a code line, in the cell text for a table row.
+
+Per line, never per block. A fenced procedure routinely mixes `rtk git` steps with one deliberately
+bare command (`git-remotes/references/push.md` does exactly that), and a block-level marker would
+silently disarm every checked line around the marked one. The cost is a repeated `# bare per
+ADR-0023` in the three blocks of `git-log-format.md` where every line is deliberately bare; that
+repetition is the price of the marked line being the only line the marker speaks for.
+
+The marker is a plain substring match, so a line that mentions `ADR-0023` for an unrelated reason is
+also exempt. Accepted deliberately: the marker records an author's opt-out, it is not a security
+boundary, and a stricter form would only move the same trust to a different string.
+
+### What it deliberately does not cover
+
+- **Clause 2.** Nothing checks that an illustrative mention stayed bare. A sweep that re-prefixes a
+  referential `git` passes this gate. The inline reasons ADR-0023 requires on clause-3 sites are the
+  only defence, and they are prose.
+- **Prose bullets.** Most of `branch-operations.md`, `merging.md` and `rewrite-history.md` instruct
+  in list items, not fences. Those are clause-1 sites the gate cannot see, because it cannot
+  distinguish them from clause-2 mentions in the same list.
+- **`README.md`, excluded by pattern.** A skill-directory README is consumer-facing prose no agent
+  loads, and the `git clone https://github.com/bats-core/…` lines in the seven `tests/README.md`
+  files are setup instructions for a third party who has no `rtk`. Prefixing those would be actively
+  wrong, not merely noisy — see ADR-0023's consumer section.
+- **Quoting.** The line splitter breaks on `;`, `|`, `&&`, `||`, `$(` and backticks without tracking
+  quotes, so a git command inside a quoted argument is decided by accident.
+  `rtk git submodule foreach 'git pull origin main || :'` passes because the segment holding the
+  inner command begins with `rtk` — the right answer for the wrong reason. Write
+  `foreach 'git a; git b'` and the second inner command is a false positive needing the marker.
+  ADR-0023 records this shape as one the rule itself does not decide.
+- **Non-git commands.** Only `git` is checked. `rtk` fronts `gh`, `docker`, `kubectl` and others; no
+  gate covers those, and the corpus does not currently instruct them.
+
+`tests/test-check-rtk-prefix.sh` pins all of it, including the false-positive cases. Its first case
+reconstructs the plugin corpus as it stood on `main` before the #113 sweep and asserts the gate
+fails there with at least 20 findings, one of them the `gitea-*` `git remote get-url origin` drift
+the sweep missed — a gate that only passes on the already-fixed tree proves nothing about the drift
+it was written for.
+
+## Vale
+
+Install the `vale` binary — `brew install vale` (macOS), `snap install vale` (Linux),
+`choco install vale` (Windows), or see <https://vale.sh/docs/vale-cli/installation/>. No `vale sync`
+is needed: the `Kyberforge` styles are **committed** under
+`plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/{skill-audit,agent-audit}/assets/vale/styles/`, not downloaded
+packages (ADR-0014).
+
+### Two copies, one canonical
+
+Wiring Vale as a deterministic prefilter for `skill-audit`/`agent-audit`'s Description dimension
+(motivation: issue #84) is repo-specific, not part of the generic `lint` plugin, so it does not live
+in `plugins/lint/` — and per ADR-0014 it no longer lives at the repo root either. It lives **twice**,
+one copy per skill, both under `plugins/kyberforge/.apm/skills/`:
+
+| Copy | Styles | `.vale.ini` sections |
+|---|---|---|
+| `agent-audit/assets/vale/` — **canonical** | `Kyberforge`, `KyberforgeCopilot` | `[**/agents/*.md]`, `[**/*.agent.md]` |
+| `skill-audit/assets/vale/` — smaller duplicate | `Kyberforge` | `[**/SKILL.md]` |
+
+Duplicated rather than shared because a plugin's cache-install copies only each skill's own files —
+there is no cross-skill sharing to point at. `check-vale-style-sync` at pre-push is what keeps them
+from drifting; `KyberforgeCopilot` is the one deliberate inequality, being scoped only to `.agent.md`
+files for the Copilot-only "`Use proactively` has no effect" check.
+
+### What Vale owns, and what stays LLM judgment
+
+Eleven rule files across the two copies, six distinct rules:
+
+| Rule | Vale scope | Bans | From |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| `Kyberforge.DescriptionOpener` | `text.frontmatter.description` | non-imperative openers ("This skill/agent…") | issue #84 |
+| `Kyberforge.VagueWording` | `text.frontmatter.description` | vague capability wording ("helps with", "utilize", …) | issue #84 |
+| `Kyberforge.PaddingPhrase` | `text` | generic "see `references/` for details" padding | issue #84 |
+| `KyberforgeCopilot.ProactivePhrase` | `text.frontmatter.description` | `Use proactively` (no effect in Copilot) | issue #84 |
+| `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` | `sentence` | "There is/are" sentence openers | ADR-0013 |
+| `Kyberforge.CompositionNote` | `text.frontmatter.description` | architecture and composition prose in a description | ADR-0020 |
+
+Vale covers the **pattern-matchable** sub-checks named in issue #84 plus, per ADR-0013, one
+cherry-picked body-wide prose-pattern rule. Everything else stays LLM judgment: defaults-vs-menus,
+why-rationale, the non-pattern-matchable body-discipline calls, near-miss exclusion strength, and
+control calibration. New rules land directly in `styles/Kyberforge` and block immediately — there is
+no trial tier.
+
+The cherry-pick record, so it is not re-litigated:
+
+- `Kyberforge.SentenceOpenerThereIs` **landed** — 22 held-out hits, both in-corpus hits clean
+  rewrites, zero suppressions needed.
+- `Kyberforge.VagueQualifier` was cherry-picked and then **deleted**. 2 hits across the corpus as it
+  stood on 2026-08-08 (before the `.apm/` restructure): one marginal, and one unfixable false
+  positive — `caveman/SKILL.md` quotes `of course` as an example of filler, a mention rather than a
+  use — which forced the repo's only Vale suppression comments.
+- `governance.md` and `CONTROLS.md` were evaluated as rule sources and **excluded**: nothing
+  prose-pattern-matchable to mine.
+
+### Why every rule is `level: error`
+
+Every alert is a FAIL, with no ignorable tier — same all-or-nothing model as shellcheck, the test
+suite, and conventional-pre-commit. Graded severities do not work here: **Vale's exit code keys on
+`error` alerts alone**, so a `warning` or `suggestion` rule exits 0, and pre-commit swallows a
+passing hook's output. Such a rule would be invisible and would block nothing.
+
+`MinAlertLevel` and `--minAlertLevel` are correspondingly **absent** from both `.vale.ini` files and
+from the hook definitions. Under this model they are no-ops; adding one is not a missing knob.
+
+The `verbose: true` escape hatch that makes `skill-size-check`'s SUGGESTION tier audible has no
+analogue here — Vale has no tier to make audible.
+
+### External consumers: the root `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml`
+
+The root `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` exposes both Vale copies (`kyberforge-vale-audit-skill`,
+`kyberforge-vale-audit-agent`) plus `kyberforge-skill-size-check`, so any external repo can enforce
+the same rules with `repo: <this-repo-url>, rev: <tag>` in its own `.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
+pre-commit clones the pinned rev into its own cache, independent of whether Claude Code or the
+`kyberforge` plugin is installed at all; the same mechanism covers CI via `pre-commit run
+--all-files`. `skill-size-check` has no external asset dependency, so it needed no relocation under
+ADR-0014 — only exposure.
+
+This repo's own `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` / `-agent` hooks consume the **identical**
+plugin-bundled copies via `repo: local`. Deliberately not a third root copy, and deliberately **not a
+pinned self-reference** — a pinned self-reference would lint working-tree edits against the last
+tagged release rather than against the change being made.
+
+### Pre-commit
+
+Two prefilter hooks, with `.apm/`-scoped `files:` patterns:
+
+| Hook | Pattern |
+|---|---|
+| `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` | `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` |
+| `vale-audit-prefilter-agent` | `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/agents/[^/]+\.agent\.md$` |
+
+Only the **authoring source** triggers them. A `SKILL.md` in the generated flat mirror matches
+neither pattern, so prose findings surface only when you edit the file you are supposed to be
+editing. Without the binary the hooks fail with a bare "command not found" and no install pointer.
+
+**Two hooks, not one combined hook.** Both manifests split the prefilter in two precisely because a
+single hook can point at only one copy, and that copy would silently 0-file-skip the other file
+shape (see [A 0-file Vale run is NOT RUN](#a-0-file-vale-run-is-not-run)).
+
+### The `.vale.ini` globs do no scoping
+
+Each `.vale.ini`'s section globs are **path-agnostic** — `[**/SKILL.md]` for skill-audit's copy,
+`[**/agents/*.md]` and `[**/*.agent.md]` for agent-audit's — and constrain filename *shape*, not
+location: Vale's `*` crosses `/`. A `SKILL.md` outside `plugins/` (a project-scope
+`.claude/skills/foo/SKILL.md`, say) still matches `[**/SKILL.md]` and gets linted normally.
+
+All scoping therefore comes from the pre-commit hook's own `files:` regex and from the audit skills
+passing one explicit file per invocation. The two manifests scope **differently on purpose**:
+
+| Manifest | `-skill` | `-agent` |
+|---|---|---|
+| `.pre-commit-config.yaml` (pins this repo's layout) | `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` | `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/agents/[^/]+\.agent\.md$` |
+| `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` (layout-agnostic for consumers) | `(^\|/)SKILL\.md$` | `(^\|/)agents/[^/]+\.md$\|\.agent\.md$` |
+
+Narrowing a `.vale.ini` glob to a `plugins/`-shaped path to "tighten" it breaks the consumer case,
+and `check-vale-style-sync`'s probe set is built to catch exactly that.
+
+### The blind spot: `references/` is unlinted, for two independent reasons
+
+Every `references/*.md` file in the corpus is outside the prose gate. Count them with
+`git ls-files | grep -cE '^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/references/.*\.md$'` rather than reading
+a figure here; it moves with every retrofit. This is the gap that matters most, because the context
+contract's own remedy for an over-long body is to move prose **into** `references/` — the gate pushes
+text across its own boundary and then stops watching it.
+
+**Closing either cause alone changes nothing.** There are two, and they are independent:
+
+| Cause | Where | Effect on a `references/` file |
+|---|---|---|
+| the `Kyberforge` style is scoped `[**/SKILL.md]` | `skill-audit/assets/vale/.vale.ini` | matches no section, so Vale lints 0 files and exits 0 |
+| the hook's `files:` regex is `^plugins/[^/]+/\.apm/skills/[^/]+/SKILL\.md$` | `vale-audit-prefilter-skill` in `.pre-commit-config.yaml` | the file is never handed to Vale at all |
+
+Verified both ways. Handing skill-audit's `vale-wrap.sh` a reference file directly — bypassing
+pre-commit entirely, so only the style scope is in play — prints `0 errors … in 0 files` and exits 0,
+where the same wrapper on a `SKILL.md` reports `in 1 file`. And the hook's `files:` regex, applied to
+`git ls-files`, selects only the skill-directory `SKILL.md` files scoped at the top of this page, so
+pre-commit never hands Vale a reference file to begin with. Widening the glob to `[**/*.md]` would
+still lint nothing through the hook; widening the hook's `files:` alone would hand Vale files its own
+config declines to match, which is the [0-file NOT RUN](#a-0-file-vale-run-is-not-run) shape — a
+green run that measured nothing. **Issue #117** records the style-scope half; the hook half has to
+land in the same change or the fix is cosmetic.
+
+The consumer manifest is a third axis and does not rescue this either: `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml`'s
+`(^|/)SKILL\.md$` is layout-agnostic but still filename-shaped, so an external repo running
+`kyberforge-vale-audit-skill` has the same gap.
+
+### `vale-wrap.sh`, never bare `vale`
+
+Both audit skills' Step 1 and both pre-commit hooks call **each copy's own**
+`scripts/vale-wrap.sh`, not `vale`. It works around a confirmed **Vale 3.15.2** limitation:
+`text.frontmatter.description` silently stops matching on most — not all — multi-line descriptions.
+
+Verified by reproduction on a deliberately-bad fixture, not assumed:
+
+| Description scalar spanning 2+ lines | Vale's behaviour |
+|---|---|
+| `>` folded block | 0 alerts, exit 0 — **broken** |
+| plain (unquoted) continuation lines | 0 alerts, exit 0 — **broken** |
+| single- or double-quoted, wrapped | 0 alerts, exit 0 — **broken** |
+| `\|` literal block | alerts fire, exit 1 — lints normally |
+
+The wrapper flattens the three broken forms to a single-line scalar in a scratch copy — or, for the
+rare value no inline scalar can spell verbatim, a `|-` block with one content line — padding with
+blank lines so **every other line number is unchanged**. `|` literal blocks and single-line
+descriptions pass through untouched. Most descriptions in this repo are `>` blocks, so before the
+wrapper a bad description in any of the three broken forms sailed straight through the prefilter.
+
+### The `--config` argv defect
+
+Handed **no `--config` at all**, the wrapper falls back to its own sibling `assets/vale/.vale.ini`,
+located from `${BASH_SOURCE[0]}` rather than from the cwd. That is why both manifests' `entry:` is
+now the bare script path with **no argument after it**.
+
+pre-commit prefixes only `entry[0]` with the hook-repo clone path (`cmd = (prefix.path(cmd[0]),
+*cmd[1:])`), so every later argument resolves against the **consuming** repo's root. A `--config` in
+`.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` therefore pointed at a path no consumer has and hard-failed every external
+run with `E100 [--config] Runtime error`.
+
+`.pre-commit-config.yaml` drops the argument too, deliberately keeping the two entries identical.
+The local `repo: local` hook resolved its `--config` correctly only because the consuming repo *was*
+this repo — and that divergence is why three review rounds exercised a path no external consumer
+takes and missed the defect. **Do not reintroduce a `--config` to either manifest to make the local
+run "explicit".**
+
+An explicit `--config` from any other caller still wins, in all three argv forms (`--config X`,
+`--config=/abs`, `--config=rel`), and a relative one resolves against the caller's cwd — matching
+bare `vale`, not the repo root.
+
+Both audit skills' Step 1 passes no `--config` either. Step 1 resolves the script relative to the
+skill's own directory so the call works from an installed plugin cache; a relative `--config`
+alongside it would resolve against the cwd instead, yielding `E100 Runtime error … does not exist`
+and exit 2 — which both skills' fallback misreads as "vale unavailable" and silently downgrades to
+full LLM judgment.
+
+`tests/test-vale-wrap.sh` regression-tests this against **skill-audit's** copy specifically: its
+fixtures are all `SKILL.md`-shaped, and only skill-audit's `.vale.ini` carries that glob section.
+
+### A 0-file Vale run is NOT RUN
+
+Vale reports 0 files only when the path it is handed matches **no glob section at all** — a
+differently-named file, or a directory argument holding nothing that matches. That run prints
+
+```
+✔ 0 errors ... in 0 files.
+```
+
+and exits 0, indistinguishable from a clean pass. Both audits therefore treat a 0-file Vale run as
+**NOT RUN** and fall back to full LLM judgment rather than reporting the Description dimension
+clean.
+
+### Pre-push
+
+`vale` is a **pre-push** dependency too, not only pre-commit. `check-vale-style-sync` runs **six
+glob-coverage probes** by invoking `vale --config` — one representative path per file shape the
+prefilter is supposed to cover. They are the only assertions in the script that catch a `.vale.ini`
+glob typo (`[**/SKILL.md]` → `[**/SKILLS.md]`), the failure mode where every text-level check stays
+clean while vale lints zero files. As a warning this self-disabled on exactly that mutation and
+exited 0, and since pre-commit swallows a passing hook's output the stderr line was never seen — the
+hook reported `Passed`. Missing `vale` is therefore a hard failure here.
+
+The opt-out is `CHECK_VALE_STYLE_SYNC_ALLOW_MISSING_VALE=1`, and **it is not `SKIP=`**: the hook
+still runs and still asserts everything verifiable from file text, but the six probes do not, and its
+summary says so explicitly —
+
+```
+Vale style sync check passed (text-level only, vale unavailable): … 0 glob probe(s) verified.
+```
+
+Use it only on a machine that genuinely cannot install `vale`, and read that line as "the glob axis
+was not checked", not as a pass. The hook is `verbose: true` for exactly that reason — its clean
+output is a single line, so it costs one line per push.
+
+### Mentioning banned phrasing without tripping the rule
+
+House convention: banned phrasing that must be **mentioned** rather than used goes in backticks or a
+fenced code block. Vale skips code spans and fences, so no suppression is needed — which is why this
+document quotes `Use proactively` and "There is/are" the way it does.
+
+Inline `<!-- vale Rule = NO -->` is the fallback **only** where backticking is impossible. Use the
+HTML-comment form; the MDX `{/* */}` form does not work in plain Markdown. The one time a rule forced
+suppression comments, the rule was deleted instead (see the `VagueQualifier` entry above).
+
+## Tests
+
+```
+bash tests/run-tests.sh              # every test-*.sh plus the bats suite
+bash tests/run-tests.sh --bats-only  # just bats
+```
+
+First run auto-initializes the bats submodules; no manual `git submodule update` needed.
+
+**Exit 77 = SKIPPED.** A suite that skips because a dependency is missing does **not** fail an ad-hoc
+run. The pre-push hook invokes the same script as `--strict` (`RUN_TESTS_STRICT=1` is equivalent),
+where a skip **does** fail the push: at pre-push a skip means one of the documented dependencies is
+absent on this machine, so the gate would otherwise report success having run fewer suites than it
+appears to. Without `--strict` the gate once went green having verified 15 of 17 suites on a
+vale-less PATH, with the skip list swallowed. Without vale, three suites skip —
+`test-check-vale-style-sync.sh`, `test-vale-hooks-consumer.sh`, `test-vale-wrap.sh` — and the strict
+failure names each one and what to install.
+
+`tests/run-bats.sh` derives the set of `.bats` files it expects from `git ls-files`, so a `.bats`
+file deleted from the worktree but still tracked in the index fails the run rather than silently
+shrinking the suite. Remove one with `git rm` (or stage the deletion) when intentional; an untracked
+new `.bats` file is picked up and needs no ceremony.
+
+Both discovery walks (`tests/run-bats.sh` and `tests/run-tests.sh`) exclude `apm_modules/`:
+`apm install` materializes a full copy of every plugin there, and running a dependency's copy of a
+`.bats` file breaks its relative path to the bats helpers — **167 spurious failures** before the
+exclusion landed.
+
+## apm gates
+
+### `apm-audit-ci`
+
+Runs `apm audit --ci` **once per manifest** — the root one and each of the six plugin packages —
+because the root-only invocation audits the marketplace manifest and **nothing else**, and
+`apm-pack-check-clean` does not parse plugin `dependencies:` blocks either. Verified: a malformed
+dependency entry passes `apm pack --check-versions --check-clean --dry-run` and fails
+`apm audit --ci` in that package's directory. Costs ~0.5s per package.
+
+It verifies **exactly two things** per manifest and claims no more:
+
+- **manifest-parse** — each `apm.yml` parses as a valid APM manifest. Unconditional; verified to fire
+  on a dependency entry missing its `git`/`path`/`registry` field (`Cannot parse apm.yml`).
+- **lockfile-exists** — any package declaring dependencies has a consistent `apm.lock.yaml`.
+  Conditional, and vacuous while every plugin `apm.yml` declares `dependencies: {apm: [], mcp: []}`;
+  it arms itself the moment one does not (verified by adding a git dependency to
+  `plugins/lint/apm.yml`).
+
+It does **not** enforce an org policy. apm discovers one from the git remote and only understands
+github.com and Azure DevOps, so against this repo's self-hosted Gitea remote it prints:
+
+```
+No org policy found at unknown; enforcement skipped
+```
+
+**Do not "fix" that with `policy.fetch_failure_default: block` in `apm.yml`.** apm's own message
+suggests it; it was tried on a scratch copy and **rejected**. With no reachable policy source it does
+not make the check meaningful, it makes it permanently red — `apm audit --ci` exits 1 with
+`No org policy found at unknown (policy.fetch_failure_default=block)` on every push, forever. A gate
+that can never go green is not a gate. Revisit only if this repo gains a policy source apm can reach.
+
+It also does not scan for hidden Unicode: that scan is plain `apm audit`, a different mode (`--ci`
+refuses to combine with `--file`/`--strip`/`--dry-run`/`PACKAGE`), and plain `apm audit` here reports
+`No apm.lock.yaml found -- nothing to scan` and exits 0. Adding it would buy a second vacuous check.
+
+### `check-executables-allow-sync`
+
+apm gates a package's `hooks/` and `bin/` on an **exact `<package>#<version>` dictionary lookup** in
+root `apm.yml`'s `executables.allow` (`apm_cli/security/executables.py`, `is_package_approved`).
+There is no wildcard and no version-less form.
+
+So bumping `plugins/kyberforge/apm.yml`'s `version:` without bumping the key **errors nowhere**: the
+entry simply stops matching, the gate blocks the hook, kyberforge's `SessionStart` hook stops
+deploying, and the apm install goes quietly stale — the exact failure ADR-0019 exists to end,
+reintroduced through the mechanism meant to secure it. ADR-0019 records this as a live failure mode;
+the release that shipped the hook hit it immediately.
+
+`scripts/check-executables-allow-sync.sh` parses `version:` out of `plugins/kyberforge/apm.yml` and
+asserts root `apm.yml` carries the matching `kyberforge#<version>` key. A comment in the
+`executables:` block stays as the human-facing pointer; the hook is what actually holds. It parses
+with PyYAML where importable and falls back to a two-shape scan otherwise, so a missing pip package
+cannot become the thing that blocks every push.
+
+## `.claude/settings.json`
+
+**apm owns this file. Nothing repo-authored goes in it.**
+
+`apm audit --ci` replays the install into a scratch tree and diffs the result byte-for-byte, so
+anything apm would not have written there — an `enabledPlugins` block, a real `hooks` entry — is
+permanent drift that fails `apm-audit-ci`. A hook you want in this repo is authored in
+`plugins/<name>/.apm/hooks/` and deployed by apm, never hand-written here.
+
+Its committed content is whatever apm last wrote, which today is the merged `SessionStart` entry for
+kyberforge's `check-apm-current.sh`. That is apm's own output and it belongs in the commit (ADR-0019;
+ADR-0018's statement that the committed content is exactly `{"hooks": {}}` is superseded on that
+point only). Machine-specific settings go in the gitignored `.claude/settings.local.json`, which apm
+does not deploy and the replay does not compare; shared enforcement belongs in
+`.pre-commit-config.yaml`.
+
+### Why it is excluded from `pretty-format-json`
+
+It is the **sixth and last alternation** in that hook's `exclude:` pattern, and the only one there
+for a reason other than "generated manifest". Mind which number you are quoting: **six alternations,
+expanding to sixteen real files** — 3 root marketplace manifests, 2 per plugin × 6 plugins, plus this
+one.
+
+`pretty-format-json --autofix` sorts object keys unless `--no-sort-keys` is passed, while apm's hook
+integrator emits insertion order (`matcher` before `hooks`, `type` before `command`). Leaving the
+file in that hook's scope therefore rewrites apm's output into a form apm would never produce on the
+way into **every** commit, and `apm-audit-ci` then reports permanent drift on a file with an empty
+`git diff` — exactly what happened when the `SessionStart` hook first landed in `2e395a4`. Re-running
+`apm install` fixes the file; leaving it in scope would re-break it on the very commit carrying the
+fix.
+
+**Load-bearing. Do not tidy it out of that list** (see `LESSONS.md`, 2026-08-14).
+
+## Pushing without a network
+
+Exactly **two** pre-push hooks need the network, for one shared reason: root `apm.yml`'s
+`marketplace.packages[]` contains exactly one remote entry — `mattpocock-skills`,
+`source: mattpocock/skills` — and resolving it needs a `git ls-remote`.
+
+| Hook | Offline failure |
+|---|---|
+| `apm-marketplace-check` (`always_run`, resolves every entry) | `No cached refs (offline)` |
+| `apm-pack-check-clean` (re-resolves the same entry) | `Error: Git network timeout during ls-remote` |
+
+Pinning the entry to an exact version does **not** remove the call — an exact pin still ls-remotes.
+`--offline` rescues neither.
+
+To push without a network, skip both using pre-commit's own mechanism:
+
+```
+SKIP=apm-marketplace-check,apm-pack-check-clean git push
+```
+
+**Skip those two alone.** Verified under `unshare -rn`: the other twelve pre-push hooks pass offline
+because they are real local checks. (`check-executables-allow-sync` landed after that run, but reads
+two local manifests and makes no network call.) Adding any other hook to `SKIP` disarms it silently.
+
+`apm-audit-ci` calls `apm` too but stays local: its org-policy discovery resolves nothing on this
+remote *before* any network call, so it does not join the pair above.
+
+---
+
+## See also
+
+- `docs/adr/0020-skill-description-and-body-context-contract.md` — the context contract, its
+  enforcement table (deterministic vs. auditor judgment), and every rejected alternative
+- `docs/adr/0019-session-start-hook-keeps-the-apm-install-current.md` — the `SessionStart` hook, the
+  executable-trust gate, and the version-pinned allow key
+- `docs/adr/0017-plugin-content-mirror-bridges-apm-to-host-discovery.md`,
+  `docs/adr/0015-apm-replaces-plugin-marketplace-authoring.md`,
+  `docs/adr/0014-vale-prefilter-ships-from-the-plugin.md` — plugin content sync, apm-generated
+  manifests, committed Vale styles
+- `docs/spec/architecture.md` — directory structure, install pipeline, what is generated and what is
+  hand-authored
+- `.pre-commit-config.yaml` — the hooks themselves, with inline rationale comments

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/caveman/SKILL.md

@@ -1,17 +1,18 @@
 ---
 name: caveman
+disable-model-invocation: true
 description: >
-  Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by dropping
+  Ultra-compressed output mode that drops articles, filler and pleasantries while
-  filler, articles, and pleasantries while keeping full technical accuracy.
+  keeping technical substance exact, cutting token usage by roughly 75%.
-  Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman",
+metadata:
-  "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman.
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 Respond terse like smart caveman. All technical substance stay. Only fluff die.
 
 ## Persistence
 
-ACTIVE EVERY RESPONSE once triggered. No revert after many turns. No filler drift. Still active if unsure. Off only when user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
+ACTIVE EVERY RESPONSE once user type `/caveman`. No revert after many turns. No filler drift. Still active if unsure. Off only when user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
 
 ## Rules
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 ---
 name: diagnose
-description: Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
+description: >
+  Use when the user says "diagnose this" or "debug this", reports something
+  broken, throwing, or failing, or says something got slow. Not filing or
+  triaging a reported bug -> `triage`. Not test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Diagnose
 
 A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.
 
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.
+When exploring the codebase, use the domain glossary for a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area.
 
 ## Phase 1 — Build a feedback loop
 
@@ -15,40 +20,11 @@ When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear me
 
 Spend disproportionate effort here. **Be aggressive. Be creative. Refuse to give up.**
 
-### Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
+**If you do not yet have such a signal, read `references/feedback-loops.md`** — ten ways to build one ordered by cost, and what to ask the user for when the bug resists reproduction entirely.
 
-1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
+**If you do have one, it is probably not sharp enough yet.** Make it faster and more deterministic, and make it assert on the exact symptom rather than "didn't crash" — a 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. If it stays slow or intermittent after that, read that file's "Iterate on the loop itself" and "Intermittent bugs" sections.
-2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server.
-3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
-4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
-5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
-6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
-7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
-8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it.
-9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
-10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
 
-Build the right feedback loop, and the bug is 90% fixed.
+Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a loop you believe in. If you cannot build one, stop and say so explicitly, listing what you tried — never hypothesise without a signal.
-
-### Iterate on the loop itself
-
-Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, ask:
-
-- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.)
-- Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".)
-- Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)
-
-A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. A 2-second deterministic loop is a debugging superpower.
-
-### Non-deterministic bugs
-
-The goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not — keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.
-
-### When you genuinely cannot build a loop
-
-Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for: (a) access to whatever environment reproduces it, (b) a captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or (c) permission to add temporary production instrumentation. Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop.
-
-Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a loop you believe in.
 
 ## Phase 2 — Reproduce
 
@@ -57,7 +33,7 @@ Run the loop. Watch the bug appear.
 Confirm:
 
 - [ ] The loop produces the failure mode the **user** described — not a different failure that happens to be nearby. Wrong bug = wrong fix.
-- [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs (or, for non-deterministic bugs, reproducible at a high enough rate to debug against).
+- [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs. If it is intermittent, `references/feedback-loops.md` defines the rate high enough to debug against — go back to Phase 1 and raise it.
 - [ ] You have captured the exact symptom (error message, wrong output, slow timing) so later phases can verify the fix actually addresses it.
 
 Do not proceed until you reproduce the bug.
@@ -90,19 +66,17 @@ Tool preference:
 
 ## Phase 5 — Fix + regression test
 
-Write the regression test **before the fix** — but only if there is a **correct seam** for it.
+Write the regression test **before the fix** — but only at a **correct seam**: one where the test exercises the real bug pattern as it occurs at the call site. If the available seam looks too shallow, or you cannot tell whether it is, read `references/regression-seams.md`.
 
-A correct seam is one where the test exercises the **real bug pattern** as it occurs at the call site. If the only available seam is too shallow (single-caller test when the bug needs multiple callers, unit test that can't replicate the chain that triggered the bug), a regression test there gives false confidence.
+**If no correct seam exists, that itself is the finding.** Note it and carry it into Phase 6 — the architecture is preventing the bug from being locked down.
 
-**If no correct seam exists, that itself is the finding.** Note it. The codebase architecture is preventing the bug from being locked down. Flag this for the next phase.
+At a correct seam:
 
-If a correct seam exists:
+1. Turn the Phase 1 loop into a failing test at that seam, narrowed to the symptom captured in Phase 2.
-
-1. Turn the minimised repro into a failing test at that seam.
 2. Watch it fail.
 3. Apply the fix.
 4. Watch it pass.
-5. Re-run the Phase 1 feedback loop against the original (un-minimised) scenario.
+5. Re-run the Phase 1 feedback loop against the original, un-narrowed scenario.
 
 ## Phase 6 — Cleanup + post-mortem
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/diagnose/references/feedback-loops.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Constructing and sharpening a feedback loop
+
+A feedback loop is a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug. Build the right one and the bug is 90% fixed. This file covers the whole arc: building a loop, sharpening one you already have, and escalating when the bug resists reproduction.
+
+## Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
+
+1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
+2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server.
+3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
+4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
+5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
+6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
+7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
+8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it.
+9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
+10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `assets/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
+
+## Iterate on the loop itself
+
+Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, ask:
+
+- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.)
+- Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".)
+- Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)
+
+A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. A 2-second deterministic loop is a debugging superpower.
+
+## Intermittent bugs — raise the reproduction rate
+
+If the loop only sometimes fails, the goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not — keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.
+
+## When you genuinely cannot build a loop
+
+Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for:
+
+- access to whatever environment reproduces it,
+- a captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or
+- permission to add temporary production instrumentation.
+
+Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop. A hypothesis you cannot falsify against a signal is a guess, and the fix that follows it is unverifiable.

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/diagnose/references/regression-seams.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Judging a regression-test seam
+
+Read this when Phase 5 leaves you unsure whether the seam available for the regression test is the correct one — either because the obvious seam looks shallow, or because there appears to be no seam at all.
+
+## What makes a seam correct
+
+A correct seam is one where the test exercises the **real bug pattern** as it occurs at the call site: the same entry point, the same participants, the same ordering, and the same state the real caller holds when it goes wrong.
+
+## Seams that are too shallow
+
+- A single-caller test when the bug only appears with multiple callers.
+- A unit test that cannot replicate the chain of calls that triggered the bug.
+- A test that reproduces the symptom by construction — asserting on a value the test itself set — rather than by driving the code path that produces it.
+- A test that mocks out the collaborator the bug actually lives in.
+
+A regression test at a shallow seam gives false confidence. It passes forever, including after a change reintroduces the bug at the real call site, and it will be read by the next maintainer as proof the bug is locked down.
+
+## When there is no correct seam
+
+Do not force one, and do not settle for a shallow seam to have something green. Instead:
+
+1. Apply the fix and verify it against the Phase 1 loop directly.
+2. Write down which seams you considered and why each was too shallow.
+3. Carry that into Phase 6's "what would have prevented this bug" question. A missing seam is an architecture finding — tangled callers, hidden coupling, or a module with no testable boundary — and the handoff is the `improve-codebase-architecture` skill, with those specifics attached.

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 ---
 name: grill-me
-description: Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
+description: >
+  Use when the user says "grill me" or wants a plan or design stress-tested by
+  relentless interview — one question at a time, down each branch of the
+  decision tree. Not a plan to challenge against `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs ->
+  `grill-with-docs`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: grill-with-docs
-description: Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
+description: >
+  Use when a plan should be stress-tested against the project's domain model —
+  the interview challenges terms against `CONTEXT.md` and writes decisions into
+  it and into ADRs as they land. Not a plain interview -> `grill-me`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 <what-to-do>
@@ -71,7 +76,7 @@ When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you
 
 ### Update CONTEXT.md inline
 
-When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./CONTEXT-FORMAT.md).
+When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [context-format.md](references/context-format.md).
 
 Don't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
 
@@ -83,6 +88,6 @@ Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
 2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
 3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
 
-If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md).
+If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [adr-format.md](references/adr-format.md).
 
 </supporting-info>

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: improve-codebase-architecture
-description: Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring
+  opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more
+  testable and AI-navigable — deepening opportunities that turn shallow modules
+  into deep ones, informed by `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a
+  failure -> `diagnose`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Improve Codebase Architecture
@@ -9,7 +16,7 @@ Surface architectural friction and propose **deepening opportunities** — refac
 
 ## Glossary
 
-Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Full definitions in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md).
+Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary."
 
 - **Module** — anything with an interface and an implementation (function, class, package, slice).
 - **Interface** — everything a caller must know to use the module: types, invariants, error modes, ordering, config. Not just the type signature.
@@ -20,19 +27,21 @@ Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point
 - **Leverage** — what callers get from depth.
 - **Locality** — what maintainers get from depth: change, bugs, knowledge concentrated in one place.
 
-Key principles (see [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) for the full list):
+Key principles:
 
 - **Deletion test**: imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
 - **The interface is the test surface.**
 - **One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam.**
 
+If a term or principle above is ambiguous in the case in front of you, or you need the definitions and the principles the two lists leave out, read `references/language.md`.
+
 This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate.
 
 ## Process
 
 ### 1. Explore
 
-Read the project's domain glossary and any ADRs in the area you're touching first.
+Read the domain glossary and any ADRs in the area first.
 
 Then use the Agent tool with `subagent_type=Explore` to walk the codebase. Don't follow rigid heuristics — explore organically and note where you experience friction:
 
@@ -53,7 +62,7 @@ Present a numbered list of deepening opportunities. For each candidate:
 - **Solution** — plain English description of what would change
 - **Benefits** — explained in terms of locality and leverage, and also in how tests would improve
 
-**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
+**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and the architecture glossary above for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
 
 **ADR conflicts**: if a candidate contradicts an existing ADR, only surface it when the friction is real enough to warrant revisiting the ADR. Mark it clearly (e.g. _"contradicts ADR-0007 — but worth reopening because…"_). Don't list every theoretical refactor an ADR forbids.
 
@@ -65,7 +74,7 @@ Once the user picks a candidate, drop into a grilling conversation. Walk the des
 
 Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
 
-- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `/grill-with-docs` (see [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](../grill-with-docs/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md)). Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
+- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `references/context-format.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
 - **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `CONTEXT.md` right there.
-- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See [ADR-FORMAT.md](../grill-with-docs/ADR-FORMAT.md).
+- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `references/adr-format.md`.
-- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** See [INTERFACE-DESIGN.md](INTERFACE-DESIGN.md).
+- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** Read `references/interface-design.md`.

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/deepening.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Deepening
 
-How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
+How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
 
 ## Dependency categories
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/interface-design.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 When the user wants to explore alternative interfaces for a chosen deepening candidate, use this parallel sub-agent pattern. Based on "Design It Twice" (Ousterhout) — your first idea is unlikely to be the best.
 
-Uses the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
+Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
 
 ## Process
 
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Uses the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**,
 Before spawning sub-agents, write a user-facing explanation of the problem space for the chosen candidate:
 
 - The constraints any new interface would need to satisfy
-- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
+- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
 - A rough illustrative code sketch to ground the constraints — not a proposal, just a way to make the constraints concrete
 
 Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and thinks while the sub-agents work in parallel.
@@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and th
 
 Spawn 3+ sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each must produce a **radically different** interface for the deepened module.
 
-Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
+Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [deepening.md](deepening.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
 
 - Agent 1: "Minimize the interface — aim for 1–3 entry points max. Maximise leverage per entry point."
 - Agent 2: "Maximise flexibility — support many use cases and extension."
 - Agent 3: "Optimise for the most common caller — make the default case trivial."
 - Agent 4 (if applicable): "Design around ports & adapters for cross-seam dependencies."
 
-Include both [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
+Include both [language.md](language.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
 
 Each sub-agent outputs:
 
 1. Interface (types, methods, params — plus invariants, ordering, error modes)
 2. Usage example showing how callers use it
 3. What the implementation hides behind the seam
-4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
+4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
 5. Trade-offs — where leverage is high, where it's thin
 
 ### 3. Present and compare

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/prototype/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 ---
 name: prototype
-description: Build a throwaway prototype to flush out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants a throwaway prototype to answer a design question about
+  a data model, state machine or business logic, or to mock up a UI in several
+  variations. Not production code -> `tdd`. Not talking a design through ->
+  `grill-me`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 # Prototype
@@ -9,10 +15,12 @@ A prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides
 
 ## Pick a branch
 
-Identify which question is being answered — from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:
+| Question being answered | Build | Reference |
+|---|---|---|
+| "Does this logic / state model feel right?" | A tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper | `references/logic.md` |
+| "What should this look like?" | Several radically different UI variations on one route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar | `references/ui.md` |
 
-- **"Does this logic / state model feel right?"** → [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md). Build a tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper.
+Resolve the row from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around, then read only that reference — each is self-contained.
-- **"What should this look like?"** → [UI.md](UI.md). Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.
 
 The two branches produce fundamentally different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/prototype/references/logic.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ A tiny interactive terminal app that lets the user drive a state model by hand.
 - "I want to feel out what the API should look like before writing it."
 - Anything where the user wants to **press buttons and watch state change**.
 
-If the question is "what should this look like" — wrong branch. Use [UI.md](UI.md).
+If the question is "what should this look like" — wrong branch. Read `references/ui.md`.
 
 ## Process
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/prototype/references/ui.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Generate **several radically different UI variations** on a single route, switchable from a floating bottom bar. The user flips between variants in the browser, picks one (or steals bits from each), then throws the rest away.
 
-If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Use [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md).
+If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Read `references/logic.md`.
 
 ## When this is the right shape
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/research/META.md

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-```yaml
-version: "1.1"
-updated: 2026-06-21
-
-when: >-
-  Invoked when the user wants to gather structured reference documentation for a
-  tool, library, or API from MCP documentation indexes or web sources. Typically
-  run before writing a new skill that wraps an external tool, or any time
-  reference files are needed for a topic. Triggered explicitly
-  ("/research <topic> <path>") or implicitly when the user asks to look up,
-  gather, or pull docs for a topic before implementing something.
-
-references:
-  - .agents/skills/context7-mcp/SKILL.md  # context7-mcp — MCP source channel integrated at step 2
-```

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/research/SKILL.md

@@ -1,97 +1,79 @@
 ---
 name: research
 description: >-
-  Use when the user wants to research a topic and generate structured reference
+  Use when the user wants a tool, library, or API researched from canonical
-  markdown files. Handles: finding canonical docs for a tool/library/API via
+  documentation into structured per-topic reference markdown files. Not
-  Context7 MCP or web sources, reading and deepening into linked pages,
+  documentation written from existing code or specs -> `write-docs`. Not a bug
-  organizing extracted content into topic files (overview, installation,
+  or incident -> `diagnose`.
-  configuration, cli-reference, api-reference, examples, troubleshooting). Do
-  NOT use when the user wants to write documentation from existing code or specs
-  (use write-docs), install or manage the neuledge-context MCP server (use
-  neuledge-context), or research a bug/incident (use diagnose).
 metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
   category: research
 allowed-tools:
-  - WebSearch
+  - Grep
-  - WebFetch
+  - Glob
   - Read
   - Write
+  - WebSearch
+  - WebFetch
   - mcp__context7__resolve-library-id
   - mcp__context7__query-docs
 model: sonnet
 ---
 
-<requirements>
+## Gotchas
 
-## Required inputs
+- Never infer the output path. A run writes a directory's worth of files, and a guessed destination scatters them through someone's source tree. If the user named no path, stop and ask.
+- Write nothing outside the given output path. A file placed beside the agreed directory is one the user never asked for and will not think to look for.
+- Never write an empty topic file. A stub `troubleshooting.md` reads downstream as researched and closed.
+- A Context7 response that is a "no results" message, a redirect notice, or header-only boilerplate is not coverage. A topic area counts as covered only when the response carries at least one substantive paragraph.
 
-- **Topic** — the subject to research (tool, library, API, concept); inferred from user description if clear, ask if ambiguous
+## Step 1 — Scope against the working directory
-- **Output path** — directory where reference files will be written; must be provided explicitly — do not infer or default
-- **Starting URLs** — optional; if provided, skip discovery websearch and read these first
 
-## Constraints
+Search for existing use of the topic — imports, config files, version pins, reference files already written — and narrow the research to what is missing: the version actually in use, the topics not yet documented.
 
-- Never write files outside the explicitly provided output path
+The default topic areas are `overview`, `installation`, `configuration`, `cli-reference`,
-- Skip any default topic file if no relevant content is found for it — do not create empty files
+`api-reference`, `examples` and `troubleshooting` — one file each, and only where content exists.
-- Create additional topic files beyond the default list when content warrants it (e.g. `webhooks.md`, `rate-limits.md`)
+If what belongs in one of them is unclear, or the topic needs a file outside that set, read
-- Subagents handle parallel source reading and link deepening — the orchestrator writes all files; subagents return summaries only, never write directly
+`references/topics.md` for the per-topic coverage table and the custom-topic naming rule.
-- Context7 MCP calls (`resolve-library-id`, `query-docs`) are made only by the orchestrator at step 2 — subagents must not call them
-- `sources.md` is always written, even if only one source was read
-- Each topic file must have frontmatter with `topic` and `source_keys`; body is prose only — no inline URLs
-- Source keys in `sources.md` must be kebab-case slugs: derived from the source domain or page title for web sources; for Context7 sources use `context7-<library-slug>` (e.g. `context7-vercel-next-js`)
-- Default topic list and file format spec live in `references/` sub-files — read them at step 1
 
-</requirements>
+## Step 2 — Resolve against Context7
 
-<steps>
+If the topic is a library, framework, or API and the user gave no starting URLs, call `resolve-library-id` with the topic name and the user's full question — match quality depends on the question, not the bare name — then `query-docs` once per default topic area. Record each response as a source with slug `context7-<library-slug>`, and mark which topic areas it covered — those skip the web reads at step 4.
 
-## Process
+If the library does not resolve, or the user gave starting URLs, go to step 3. Explicit URLs are a source choice; do not second-guess them with a resolution attempt.
 
-1. **Scan codebase.** Search the working directory for existing usage of the topic — imports, config files, version pins, existing reference files. Use findings to narrow research scope (e.g. target the version already in use, skip topics already documented). Read `references/topics.md` for the default topic list and `references/file-format.md` for the output file format spec.
+## Step 3 — Discover sources
 
-2. **Try Context7.** If the topic is a library, framework, or API and no starting URLs were provided, call `resolve-library-id` with the topic name and the user's question. If a match resolves, call `query-docs` once per default topic area (see `references/topics.md`). Treat each response as a source summary with slug `context7-<library-slug>` (e.g. `context7-vercel-next-js`). A topic area has sufficient content when the Context7 response contains at least one substantive paragraph — not a "no results" message, redirect notice, or header-only boilerplate. Mark covered topic areas — skip their subagent web reads in step 4. If the library does not resolve, or starting URLs were provided (explicit source choice by the user), skip this step entirely.
+If the user gave starting URLs, skip discovery: those URLs are the source list and go straight to step 4.
 
-3. **Discover sources.** For topics not covered by Context7 (or when no starting URLs were provided and Context7 did not resolve), websearch for canonical documentation (prefer `llms.txt`, developer docs, official API references over tutorials or blog posts). Collect 3–5 candidate URLs before reading any.
+Otherwise, for every topic area Context7 did not cover, websearch for canonical documentation — `llms.txt`, official developer docs, and API references ahead of tutorials or blog posts. Collect three to five candidate URLs before reading any of them.
 
-4. **Read sources in parallel.** Spawn one subagent per source URL. Each subagent fetches the page, extracts relevant content, identifies links worth deepening, and returns a structured summary (content by topic area + links to follow). Subagents do not write files.
+If nothing usable comes back, stop and report what was searched, then ask for starting URLs rather than settling for tutorials.
 
-5. **Deepen.** For each subagent that returned links worth following, spawn child subagents per branch. Continue until content becomes repetitive or out of scope. Cap at ~10 additional pages total across all branches.
+## Step 4 — Read the sources
 
-6. **Consolidate.** Merge all subagent summaries (Context7 and web) by topic area. Identify which default topics have sufficient content and which custom topics emerged.
+`WebFetch` each URL in turn. No subagent tool is granted here, so the reads are serial and every fetched page lands in this context: reduce each page to notes by topic area, plus the links worth deepening, before fetching the next one.
 
-7. **Write topic files.** For each topic with content, write `<output-path>/<topic>.md` using the format in `references/file-format.md`. Orchestrator writes all files — never delegate file writing to a subagent.
+## Step 5 — Deepen
 
-8. **Write `sources.md`.** Write `<output-path>/sources.md` mapping each source slug to its URL (use `context7:<library-id>` as the URL for Context7 sources), description, and list of topic files it contributed to. Include sources that yielded no content, marked `no content extracted`.
+`WebFetch` the links worth following, still one at a time and still reducing each page to notes. Stop a branch once its content turns repetitive or leaves the topic, and cap the whole step at roughly ten additional pages — serial reads make that cap a real budget, not a formality.
 
-## Output format
+## Step 6 — Write
 
-- `<output-path>/<topic>.md` per topic with content — formatted per `references/file-format.md`
+Merge every set of notes, Context7 and web alike, by topic area, then write, in the output path:
-- `<output-path>/sources.md` — always produced; maps slug → URL, description, contributing files
 
-</steps>
+- `<topic>.md` for each topic area that has content, default or custom. Frontmatter carries `topic:` (the filename without `.md`) and `source_keys:` (kebab-case slugs matching `sources.md`); the body is prose in `##` sections, with no inline URLs.
+- `sources.md`, always, one `##` section per source — including sources that yielded nothing — with exactly these four fields:
 
-<checks>
+  ```markdown
+  - **URL:** <full URL>
+  - **Description:** <one-line summary>
+  - **Contributing files:** <topic files this source contributed to>
+  - **Status:** `extracted` | `no content extracted`
+  ```
 
-## Failure handling
+Spell those four field names exactly as given. The downstream provenance validator matches them literally; prose in their place parses as nothing, and the check passes having verified nothing.
 
-- Output path not provided — stop and ask; do not infer or default
+Read `references/file-format.md` when the four fields above do not settle the case: what a slug should be, the `context7-<library-slug>` slug and `context7:<library-id>` URL convention for a Context7 source, or what belongs in a topic body versus a verbatim copy of the source.
-- No sources found after websearch — report what was searched, ask user to provide starting URLs
-- Subagent returns no usable content — skip that source, log in `sources.md` as `no content extracted`
-- All topic files would be empty — stop, report what was searched, do not write any files
 
-## Self-check
+If no topic area has content, write nothing at all, `sources.md` included, and report what was searched.
-
-- [ ] Codebase scanned before any websearch was performed
-- [ ] Output path was explicitly provided — not inferred
-- [ ] `references/topics.md` and `references/file-format.md` read at step 1
-- [ ] Context7 resolution attempted before websearch when topic is a library/framework/API
-- [ ] Context7 calls made only at orchestrator step 2 — no subagent called `resolve-library-id` or `query-docs`
-- [ ] Context7 sources recorded in `sources.md` with `context7:<library-id>` as URL
-- [ ] No topic file written without content
-- [ ] `sources.md` written with all sources read (including those with no content extracted)
-- [ ] All file writes performed by the orchestrator, not subagents
-- [ ] Each topic file has `topic` and `source_keys` frontmatter fields
-- [ ] All source keys in topic files have a matching entry in `sources.md`
-- [ ] No files written outside the provided output path
-
-</checks>

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/tdd/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: tdd
-description: Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants a feature built or a bug fixed test-first, in a strict
+  red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time. Not diagnosing an existing
+  bug -> `diagnose`. Not throwaway exploratory code -> `prototype`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Test-Driven Development
@@ -13,7 +18,7 @@ description: Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user
 
 **Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.
 
-See [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.
+If you need worked examples of the difference — a behaviour-level test beside the implementation-coupled version of the same check — read `references/tests.md`. If a test needs a collaborator faked, read `references/mocking.md` before reaching for a mock.
 
 ## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices
 
@@ -44,14 +49,14 @@ RIGHT (vertical):
 
 ### 1. Planning
 
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
+When exploring the codebase, use the domain glossary so test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area.
 
 Before writing any code:
 
 - [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed
 - [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)
-- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
+- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](references/deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
-- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](interface-design.md)
+- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](references/interface-design.md)
 - [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)
 - [ ] Get user approval on the plan
 
@@ -88,7 +93,7 @@ Rules:
 
 ### 4. Refactor
 
-After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](refactoring.md):
+After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](references/refactoring.md):
 
 - [ ] Extract duplication
 - [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/triage/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: triage
-description: Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants an issue created, triaged, or moved through the
+  tracker's triage states, or an issue prepared for an AFK agent. Not debugging
+  the bug itself -> `diagnose`. Not fleshing out a design -> `grill-with-docs`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Triage
@@ -15,8 +20,8 @@ Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start
 
 ## Reference docs
 
-- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
+- [agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
-- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
+- [out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
 
 ## Roles
 
@@ -35,7 +40,7 @@ Five **state** roles:
 
 Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.
 
-These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
+These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. Resolve each canonical name against the tracker's live label set before applying it, using whichever tracker skill this install provides. If a name has no counterpart there, report the gap and ask the maintainer for the mapping — never substitute a guess.
 
 State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.
 
@@ -60,7 +65,7 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
 
 ## Triage a specific issue
 
-1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
+1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
 
 2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.
 
@@ -69,11 +74,11 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
 4. **Grill (if needed).** If the issue needs fleshing out, run a `/grill-with-docs` session.
 
 5. **Apply the outcome:**
-   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).
+   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md)).
    - `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
    - `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
    - `wontfix` (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
-   - `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).
+   - `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md)).
    - `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
 
 ## Quick state override

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/triage/references/agent-brief.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Writing Agent Briefs
 
-An agent brief is a structured comment posted on a GitHub issue when it moves to `ready-for-agent`. It is the authoritative specification that an AFK agent will work from. The original issue body and discussion are context — the agent brief is the contract.
+An agent brief is a structured comment posted on an issue in the issue tracker when it moves to `ready-for-agent`. It is the authoritative specification that an AFK agent will work from. The original issue body and discussion are context — the agent brief is the contract.
 
 ## Principles
 
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Describe **what** the system should do, not **how** to implement it. The agent w
 
 The agent needs to know when it's done. Every agent brief must have concrete, testable acceptance criteria. Each criterion should be independently verifiable.
 
-- **Good:** "Running `gh issue list --label needs-triage` returns issues that have been through initial classification"
+- **Good:** "Querying the issue tracker for the `needs-triage` label returns issues that have been through initial classification"
 - **Bad:** "Triage should work correctly"
 
 ### Explicit scope boundaries

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/write-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
 ---
 name: write-docs
-description: Write documentation for X, document this module, create docs for this feature. Use when the user wants to produce or update technical documentation derived from code, spec, or existing artifacts. Do NOT use when the user wants a PRD, ADR, decision doc, or skill file — those have dedicated skills.
+description: >
-version: "1.0"
+  Use when the user wants technical documentation produced or updated from code
+  or spec, every claim traced to a source — "write docs for X", "document this
+  module", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this". Not an ADR
+  or other decision record -> `grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched
+  from its docs -> `research`.
 updated: 2026-05-17
 when: invoked by explicit trigger ("write docs for X", "document this module", "create docs for this feature") or implicit request to produce technical documentation from code or spec
 metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
   category: implement
 source:
   - repo: anthropics/skills
@@ -35,7 +40,8 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
 - User says "write docs for X", "document this", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this"
 
 **Do not use when:**
-- User wants a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `to-prd` or `grill-me`
+- User wants an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-with-docs`, which writes ADRs
+- User wants a PRD → no skill in this set produces one; say so rather than redirecting
 - User wants to document a skill file (skill files are self-describing)
 - User wants marketing or blog copy
 - Documentation requires tacit organisational knowledge that cannot be read from code or spec
@@ -88,7 +94,7 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
 - Stage skipped without a logged reason → flag and require the one-sentence log before continuing
 - Code behaviour is undocumentable (internal implementation detail, no public spec) → note as out-of-scope in the doc; do not invent an explanation
 - Reader Testing sub-agent fails on multiple questions → surface the failures, return to step 4; do not mark complete
-- Requested output is a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `to-prd`, `grill-me`, or `grill-with-docs`
+- Requested output is an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-with-docs`; for a PRD, say no skill here produces one instead of redirecting
 
 ## Self-check
 

plugins/bin/.apm/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 name: zoom-out
 description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
 disable-model-invocation: true
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
-I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.
+I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary.

plugins/bin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "bin",
-  "version": "1.1.3",
+  "version": "1.1.7",
-  "description": "A place for things to be binned",
+  "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Defame1297",
     "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",

plugins/bin/.github/plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "bin",
-  "version": "1.1.3",
+  "version": "1.1.7",
-  "description": "A place for things to be binned",
+  "description": "Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Defame1297",
     "email": "defame1297@rkdr.net",

plugins/bin/apm.yml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 name: bin
-version: 1.1.3
+version: 1.1.7
-description: A place for things to be binned
+description: Skills for everyday AI-assisted development work that is not tied to a single tool, forge or language, and has not yet been split into a focused plugin.
 author:
   name: Defame1297
   email: defame1297@rkdr.net

plugins/bin/evals/research/research/eval.yaml

@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@ trigger_tests:
     query: "Research why these integration tests are failing"
     should_trigger: false
 
-  - id: negative-neuledge
-    name: "Negative — MCP server setup goes to neuledge-context"
-    query: "Install the neuledge context server and set it up"
-    should_trigger: false
-
   - id: negative-context7-direct-question
     name: "Negative — direct doc question goes to context7-mcp, not research"
     query: "What are the Next.js middleware options?"

plugins/bin/skills/caveman/SKILL.md

@@ -1,17 +1,18 @@
 ---
 name: caveman
+disable-model-invocation: true
 description: >
-  Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by dropping
+  Ultra-compressed output mode that drops articles, filler and pleasantries while
-  filler, articles, and pleasantries while keeping full technical accuracy.
+  keeping technical substance exact, cutting token usage by roughly 75%.
-  Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman",
+metadata:
-  "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman.
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 Respond terse like smart caveman. All technical substance stay. Only fluff die.
 
 ## Persistence
 
-ACTIVE EVERY RESPONSE once triggered. No revert after many turns. No filler drift. Still active if unsure. Off only when user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
+ACTIVE EVERY RESPONSE once user type `/caveman`. No revert after many turns. No filler drift. Still active if unsure. Off only when user says "stop caveman" or "normal mode".
 
 ## Rules
 

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,18 @@
 ---
 name: diagnose
-description: Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
+description: >
+  Use when the user says "diagnose this" or "debug this", reports something
+  broken, throwing, or failing, or says something got slow. Not filing or
+  triaging a reported bug -> `triage`. Not test-first feature work -> `tdd`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Diagnose
 
 A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.
 
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.
+When exploring the codebase, use the domain glossary for a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area.
 
 ## Phase 1 — Build a feedback loop
 
@@ -15,40 +20,11 @@ When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear me
 
 Spend disproportionate effort here. **Be aggressive. Be creative. Refuse to give up.**
 
-### Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
+**If you do not yet have such a signal, read `references/feedback-loops.md`** — ten ways to build one ordered by cost, and what to ask the user for when the bug resists reproduction entirely.
 
-1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
+**If you do have one, it is probably not sharp enough yet.** Make it faster and more deterministic, and make it assert on the exact symptom rather than "didn't crash" — a 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. If it stays slow or intermittent after that, read that file's "Iterate on the loop itself" and "Intermittent bugs" sections.
-2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server.
-3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
-4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
-5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
-6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
-7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
-8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it.
-9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
-10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `scripts/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
 
-Build the right feedback loop, and the bug is 90% fixed.
+Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a loop you believe in. If you cannot build one, stop and say so explicitly, listing what you tried — never hypothesise without a signal.
-
-### Iterate on the loop itself
-
-Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, ask:
-
-- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.)
-- Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".)
-- Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)
-
-A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. A 2-second deterministic loop is a debugging superpower.
-
-### Non-deterministic bugs
-
-The goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not — keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.
-
-### When you genuinely cannot build a loop
-
-Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for: (a) access to whatever environment reproduces it, (b) a captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or (c) permission to add temporary production instrumentation. Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop.
-
-Do not proceed to Phase 2 until you have a loop you believe in.
 
 ## Phase 2 — Reproduce
 
@@ -57,7 +33,7 @@ Run the loop. Watch the bug appear.
 Confirm:
 
 - [ ] The loop produces the failure mode the **user** described — not a different failure that happens to be nearby. Wrong bug = wrong fix.
-- [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs (or, for non-deterministic bugs, reproducible at a high enough rate to debug against).
+- [ ] The failure is reproducible across multiple runs. If it is intermittent, `references/feedback-loops.md` defines the rate high enough to debug against — go back to Phase 1 and raise it.
 - [ ] You have captured the exact symptom (error message, wrong output, slow timing) so later phases can verify the fix actually addresses it.
 
 Do not proceed until you reproduce the bug.
@@ -90,19 +66,17 @@ Tool preference:
 
 ## Phase 5 — Fix + regression test
 
-Write the regression test **before the fix** — but only if there is a **correct seam** for it.
+Write the regression test **before the fix** — but only at a **correct seam**: one where the test exercises the real bug pattern as it occurs at the call site. If the available seam looks too shallow, or you cannot tell whether it is, read `references/regression-seams.md`.
 
-A correct seam is one where the test exercises the **real bug pattern** as it occurs at the call site. If the only available seam is too shallow (single-caller test when the bug needs multiple callers, unit test that can't replicate the chain that triggered the bug), a regression test there gives false confidence.
+**If no correct seam exists, that itself is the finding.** Note it and carry it into Phase 6 — the architecture is preventing the bug from being locked down.
 
-**If no correct seam exists, that itself is the finding.** Note it. The codebase architecture is preventing the bug from being locked down. Flag this for the next phase.
+At a correct seam:
 
-If a correct seam exists:
+1. Turn the Phase 1 loop into a failing test at that seam, narrowed to the symptom captured in Phase 2.
-
-1. Turn the minimised repro into a failing test at that seam.
 2. Watch it fail.
 3. Apply the fix.
 4. Watch it pass.
-5. Re-run the Phase 1 feedback loop against the original (un-minimised) scenario.
+5. Re-run the Phase 1 feedback loop against the original, un-narrowed scenario.
 
 ## Phase 6 — Cleanup + post-mortem
 

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/references/feedback-loops.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Constructing and sharpening a feedback loop
+
+A feedback loop is a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug. Build the right one and the bug is 90% fixed. This file covers the whole arc: building a loop, sharpening one you already have, and escalating when the bug resists reproduction.
+
+## Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
+
+1. **Failing test** at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
+2. **Curl / HTTP script** against a running dev server.
+3. **CLI invocation** with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
+4. **Headless browser script** (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
+5. **Replay a captured trace.** Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
+6. **Throwaway harness.** Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
+7. **Property / fuzz loop.** If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
+8. **Bisection harness.** If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can `git bisect run` it.
+9. **Differential loop.** Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
+10. **HITL bash script.** Last resort. If a human must click, drive _them_ with `assets/hitl-loop.template.sh` so the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
+
+## Iterate on the loop itself
+
+Treat the loop as a product. Once you have _a_ loop, ask:
+
+- Can I make it faster? (Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope.)
+- Can I make the signal sharper? (Assert on the specific symptom, not "didn't crash".)
+- Can I make it more deterministic? (Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network.)
+
+A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than no loop. A 2-second deterministic loop is a debugging superpower.
+
+## Intermittent bugs — raise the reproduction rate
+
+If the loop only sometimes fails, the goal is not a clean repro but a **higher reproduction rate**. Loop the trigger 100×, parallelise, add stress, narrow timing windows, inject sleeps. A 50%-flake bug is debuggable; 1% is not — keep raising the rate until it's debuggable.
+
+## When you genuinely cannot build a loop
+
+Stop and say so explicitly. List what you tried. Ask the user for:
+
+- access to whatever environment reproduces it,
+- a captured artifact (HAR file, log dump, core dump, screen recording with timestamps), or
+- permission to add temporary production instrumentation.
+
+Do **not** proceed to hypothesise without a loop. A hypothesis you cannot falsify against a signal is a guess, and the fix that follows it is unverifiable.

plugins/bin/skills/diagnose/references/regression-seams.md

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# Judging a regression-test seam
+
+Read this when Phase 5 leaves you unsure whether the seam available for the regression test is the correct one — either because the obvious seam looks shallow, or because there appears to be no seam at all.
+
+## What makes a seam correct
+
+A correct seam is one where the test exercises the **real bug pattern** as it occurs at the call site: the same entry point, the same participants, the same ordering, and the same state the real caller holds when it goes wrong.
+
+## Seams that are too shallow
+
+- A single-caller test when the bug only appears with multiple callers.
+- A unit test that cannot replicate the chain of calls that triggered the bug.
+- A test that reproduces the symptom by construction — asserting on a value the test itself set — rather than by driving the code path that produces it.
+- A test that mocks out the collaborator the bug actually lives in.
+
+A regression test at a shallow seam gives false confidence. It passes forever, including after a change reintroduces the bug at the real call site, and it will be read by the next maintainer as proof the bug is locked down.
+
+## When there is no correct seam
+
+Do not force one, and do not settle for a shallow seam to have something green. Instead:
+
+1. Apply the fix and verify it against the Phase 1 loop directly.
+2. Write down which seams you considered and why each was too shallow.
+3. Carry that into Phase 6's "what would have prevented this bug" question. A missing seam is an architecture finding — tangled callers, hidden coupling, or a module with no testable boundary — and the handoff is the `improve-codebase-architecture` skill, with those specifics attached.

plugins/bin/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 ---
 name: grill-me
-description: Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
+description: >
+  Use when the user says "grill me" or wants a plan or design stress-tested by
+  relentless interview — one question at a time, down each branch of the
+  decision tree. Not a plan to challenge against `CONTEXT.md` and ADRs ->
+  `grill-with-docs`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.

plugins/bin/skills/grill-with-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: grill-with-docs
-description: Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
+description: >
+  Use when a plan should be stress-tested against the project's domain model —
+  the interview challenges terms against `CONTEXT.md` and writes decisions into
+  it and into ADRs as they land. Not a plain interview -> `grill-me`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 <what-to-do>
@@ -71,7 +76,7 @@ When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you
 
 ### Update CONTEXT.md inline
 
-When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./CONTEXT-FORMAT.md).
+When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [context-format.md](references/context-format.md).
 
 Don't couple `CONTEXT.md` to implementation details. Only include terms that are meaningful to domain experts.
 
@@ -83,6 +88,6 @@ Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:
 2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
 3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons
 
-If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md).
+If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [adr-format.md](references/adr-format.md).
 
 </supporting-info>

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: improve-codebase-architecture
-description: Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring
+  opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more
+  testable and AI-navigable — deepening opportunities that turn shallow modules
+  into deep ones, informed by `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. Not debugging a
+  failure -> `diagnose`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Improve Codebase Architecture
@@ -9,7 +16,7 @@ Surface architectural friction and propose **deepening opportunities** — refac
 
 ## Glossary
 
-Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Full definitions in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md).
+Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point — don't drift into "component," "service," "API," or "boundary."
 
 - **Module** — anything with an interface and an implementation (function, class, package, slice).
 - **Interface** — everything a caller must know to use the module: types, invariants, error modes, ordering, config. Not just the type signature.
@@ -20,19 +27,21 @@ Use these terms exactly in every suggestion. Consistent language is the point
 - **Leverage** — what callers get from depth.
 - **Locality** — what maintainers get from depth: change, bugs, knowledge concentrated in one place.
 
-Key principles (see [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) for the full list):
+Key principles:
 
 - **Deletion test**: imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
 - **The interface is the test surface.**
 - **One adapter = hypothetical seam. Two adapters = real seam.**
 
+If a term or principle above is ambiguous in the case in front of you, or you need the definitions and the principles the two lists leave out, read `references/language.md`.
+
 This skill is _informed_ by the project's domain model. The domain language gives names to good seams; ADRs record decisions the skill should not re-litigate.
 
 ## Process
 
 ### 1. Explore
 
-Read the project's domain glossary and any ADRs in the area you're touching first.
+Read the domain glossary and any ADRs in the area first.
 
 Then use the Agent tool with `subagent_type=Explore` to walk the codebase. Don't follow rigid heuristics — explore organically and note where you experience friction:
 
@@ -53,7 +62,7 @@ Present a numbered list of deepening opportunities. For each candidate:
 - **Solution** — plain English description of what would change
 - **Benefits** — explained in terms of locality and leverage, and also in how tests would improve
 
-**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
+**Use CONTEXT.md vocabulary for the domain, and the architecture glossary above for the architecture.** If `CONTEXT.md` defines "Order," talk about "the Order intake module" — not "the FooBarHandler," and not "the Order service."
 
 **ADR conflicts**: if a candidate contradicts an existing ADR, only surface it when the friction is real enough to warrant revisiting the ADR. Mark it clearly (e.g. _"contradicts ADR-0007 — but worth reopening because…"_). Don't list every theoretical refactor an ADR forbids.
 
@@ -65,7 +74,7 @@ Once the user picks a candidate, drop into a grilling conversation. Walk the des
 
 Side effects happen inline as decisions crystallize:
 
-- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `/grill-with-docs` (see [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](../grill-with-docs/CONTEXT-FORMAT.md)). Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
+- **Naming a deepened module after a concept not in `CONTEXT.md`?** Add the term to `CONTEXT.md` — same discipline as `grill-with-docs`, in the format `grill-with-docs`'s `references/context-format.md` defines. Create the file lazily if it doesn't exist.
 - **Sharpening a fuzzy term during the conversation?** Update `CONTEXT.md` right there.
-- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See [ADR-FORMAT.md](../grill-with-docs/ADR-FORMAT.md).
+- **User rejects the candidate with a load-bearing reason?** Offer an ADR, framed as: _"Want me to record this as an ADR so future architecture reviews don't re-suggest it?"_ Only offer when the reason would actually be needed by a future explorer to avoid re-suggesting the same thing — skip ephemeral reasons ("not worth it right now") and self-evident ones. See `grill-with-docs`'s `references/adr-format.md`.
-- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** See [INTERFACE-DESIGN.md](INTERFACE-DESIGN.md).
+- **Want to explore alternative interfaces for the deepened module?** Read `references/interface-design.md`.

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/deepening.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Deepening
 
-How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
+How to deepen a cluster of shallow modules safely, given its dependencies. Assumes the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**.
 
 ## Dependency categories
 

plugins/bin/skills/improve-codebase-architecture/references/interface-design.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 When the user wants to explore alternative interfaces for a chosen deepening candidate, use this parallel sub-agent pattern. Based on "Design It Twice" (Ousterhout) — your first idea is unlikely to be the best.
 
-Uses the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
+Uses the vocabulary in [language.md](language.md) — **module**, **interface**, **seam**, **adapter**, **leverage**.
 
 ## Process
 
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Uses the vocabulary in [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) — **module**, **interface**,
 Before spawning sub-agents, write a user-facing explanation of the problem space for the chosen candidate:
 
 - The constraints any new interface would need to satisfy
-- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
+- The dependencies it would rely on, and which category they fall into (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
 - A rough illustrative code sketch to ground the constraints — not a proposal, just a way to make the constraints concrete
 
 Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and thinks while the sub-agents work in parallel.
@@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ Show this to the user, then immediately proceed to Step 2. The user reads and th
 
 Spawn 3+ sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each must produce a **radically different** interface for the deepened module.
 
-Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
+Prompt each sub-agent with a separate technical brief (file paths, coupling details, dependency category from [deepening.md](deepening.md), what sits behind the seam). The brief is independent of the user-facing problem-space explanation in Step 1. Give each agent a different design constraint:
 
 - Agent 1: "Minimize the interface — aim for 1–3 entry points max. Maximise leverage per entry point."
 - Agent 2: "Maximise flexibility — support many use cases and extension."
 - Agent 3: "Optimise for the most common caller — make the default case trivial."
 - Agent 4 (if applicable): "Design around ports & adapters for cross-seam dependencies."
 
-Include both [LANGUAGE.md](LANGUAGE.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
+Include both [language.md](language.md) vocabulary and CONTEXT.md vocabulary in the brief so each sub-agent names things consistently with the architecture language and the project's domain language.
 
 Each sub-agent outputs:
 
 1. Interface (types, methods, params — plus invariants, ordering, error modes)
 2. Usage example showing how callers use it
 3. What the implementation hides behind the seam
-4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md))
+4. Dependency strategy and adapters (see [deepening.md](deepening.md))
 5. Trade-offs — where leverage is high, where it's thin
 
 ### 3. Present and compare

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 ---
 name: prototype
-description: Build a throwaway prototype to flush out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants a throwaway prototype to answer a design question about
+  a data model, state machine or business logic, or to mock up a UI in several
+  variations. Not production code -> `tdd`. Not talking a design through ->
+  `grill-me`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
 ---
 
 # Prototype
@@ -9,10 +15,12 @@ A prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides
 
 ## Pick a branch
 
-Identify which question is being answered — from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:
+| Question being answered | Build | Reference |
+|---|---|---|
+| "Does this logic / state model feel right?" | A tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper | `references/logic.md` |
+| "What should this look like?" | Several radically different UI variations on one route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar | `references/ui.md` |
 
-- **"Does this logic / state model feel right?"** → [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md). Build a tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper.
+Resolve the row from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around, then read only that reference — each is self-contained.
-- **"What should this look like?"** → [UI.md](UI.md). Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.
 
 The two branches produce fundamentally different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.
 

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/references/logic.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ A tiny interactive terminal app that lets the user drive a state model by hand.
 - "I want to feel out what the API should look like before writing it."
 - Anything where the user wants to **press buttons and watch state change**.
 
-If the question is "what should this look like" — wrong branch. Use [UI.md](UI.md).
+If the question is "what should this look like" — wrong branch. Read `references/ui.md`.
 
 ## Process
 

plugins/bin/skills/prototype/references/ui.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Generate **several radically different UI variations** on a single route, switchable from a floating bottom bar. The user flips between variants in the browser, picks one (or steals bits from each), then throws the rest away.
 
-If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Use [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md).
+If the question is about logic/state rather than what something looks like — wrong branch. Read `references/logic.md`.
 
 ## When this is the right shape
 

plugins/bin/skills/research/META.md

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-```yaml
-version: "1.1"
-updated: 2026-06-21
-
-when: >-
-  Invoked when the user wants to gather structured reference documentation for a
-  tool, library, or API from MCP documentation indexes or web sources. Typically
-  run before writing a new skill that wraps an external tool, or any time
-  reference files are needed for a topic. Triggered explicitly
-  ("/research <topic> <path>") or implicitly when the user asks to look up,
-  gather, or pull docs for a topic before implementing something.
-
-references:
-  - .agents/skills/context7-mcp/SKILL.md  # context7-mcp — MCP source channel integrated at step 2
-```

plugins/bin/skills/research/SKILL.md

@@ -1,97 +1,79 @@
 ---
 name: research
 description: >-
-  Use when the user wants to research a topic and generate structured reference
+  Use when the user wants a tool, library, or API researched from canonical
-  markdown files. Handles: finding canonical docs for a tool/library/API via
+  documentation into structured per-topic reference markdown files. Not
-  Context7 MCP or web sources, reading and deepening into linked pages,
+  documentation written from existing code or specs -> `write-docs`. Not a bug
-  organizing extracted content into topic files (overview, installation,
+  or incident -> `diagnose`.
-  configuration, cli-reference, api-reference, examples, troubleshooting). Do
-  NOT use when the user wants to write documentation from existing code or specs
-  (use write-docs), install or manage the neuledge-context MCP server (use
-  neuledge-context), or research a bug/incident (use diagnose).
 metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
   category: research
 allowed-tools:
-  - WebSearch
+  - Grep
-  - WebFetch
+  - Glob
   - Read
   - Write
+  - WebSearch
+  - WebFetch
   - mcp__context7__resolve-library-id
   - mcp__context7__query-docs
 model: sonnet
 ---
 
-<requirements>
+## Gotchas
 
-## Required inputs
+- Never infer the output path. A run writes a directory's worth of files, and a guessed destination scatters them through someone's source tree. If the user named no path, stop and ask.
+- Write nothing outside the given output path. A file placed beside the agreed directory is one the user never asked for and will not think to look for.
+- Never write an empty topic file. A stub `troubleshooting.md` reads downstream as researched and closed.
+- A Context7 response that is a "no results" message, a redirect notice, or header-only boilerplate is not coverage. A topic area counts as covered only when the response carries at least one substantive paragraph.
 
-- **Topic** — the subject to research (tool, library, API, concept); inferred from user description if clear, ask if ambiguous
+## Step 1 — Scope against the working directory
-- **Output path** — directory where reference files will be written; must be provided explicitly — do not infer or default
-- **Starting URLs** — optional; if provided, skip discovery websearch and read these first
 
-## Constraints
+Search for existing use of the topic — imports, config files, version pins, reference files already written — and narrow the research to what is missing: the version actually in use, the topics not yet documented.
 
-- Never write files outside the explicitly provided output path
+The default topic areas are `overview`, `installation`, `configuration`, `cli-reference`,
-- Skip any default topic file if no relevant content is found for it — do not create empty files
+`api-reference`, `examples` and `troubleshooting` — one file each, and only where content exists.
-- Create additional topic files beyond the default list when content warrants it (e.g. `webhooks.md`, `rate-limits.md`)
+If what belongs in one of them is unclear, or the topic needs a file outside that set, read
-- Subagents handle parallel source reading and link deepening — the orchestrator writes all files; subagents return summaries only, never write directly
+`references/topics.md` for the per-topic coverage table and the custom-topic naming rule.
-- Context7 MCP calls (`resolve-library-id`, `query-docs`) are made only by the orchestrator at step 2 — subagents must not call them
-- `sources.md` is always written, even if only one source was read
-- Each topic file must have frontmatter with `topic` and `source_keys`; body is prose only — no inline URLs
-- Source keys in `sources.md` must be kebab-case slugs: derived from the source domain or page title for web sources; for Context7 sources use `context7-<library-slug>` (e.g. `context7-vercel-next-js`)
-- Default topic list and file format spec live in `references/` sub-files — read them at step 1
 
-</requirements>
+## Step 2 — Resolve against Context7
 
-<steps>
+If the topic is a library, framework, or API and the user gave no starting URLs, call `resolve-library-id` with the topic name and the user's full question — match quality depends on the question, not the bare name — then `query-docs` once per default topic area. Record each response as a source with slug `context7-<library-slug>`, and mark which topic areas it covered — those skip the web reads at step 4.
 
-## Process
+If the library does not resolve, or the user gave starting URLs, go to step 3. Explicit URLs are a source choice; do not second-guess them with a resolution attempt.
 
-1. **Scan codebase.** Search the working directory for existing usage of the topic — imports, config files, version pins, existing reference files. Use findings to narrow research scope (e.g. target the version already in use, skip topics already documented). Read `references/topics.md` for the default topic list and `references/file-format.md` for the output file format spec.
+## Step 3 — Discover sources
 
-2. **Try Context7.** If the topic is a library, framework, or API and no starting URLs were provided, call `resolve-library-id` with the topic name and the user's question. If a match resolves, call `query-docs` once per default topic area (see `references/topics.md`). Treat each response as a source summary with slug `context7-<library-slug>` (e.g. `context7-vercel-next-js`). A topic area has sufficient content when the Context7 response contains at least one substantive paragraph — not a "no results" message, redirect notice, or header-only boilerplate. Mark covered topic areas — skip their subagent web reads in step 4. If the library does not resolve, or starting URLs were provided (explicit source choice by the user), skip this step entirely.
+If the user gave starting URLs, skip discovery: those URLs are the source list and go straight to step 4.
 
-3. **Discover sources.** For topics not covered by Context7 (or when no starting URLs were provided and Context7 did not resolve), websearch for canonical documentation (prefer `llms.txt`, developer docs, official API references over tutorials or blog posts). Collect 3–5 candidate URLs before reading any.
+Otherwise, for every topic area Context7 did not cover, websearch for canonical documentation — `llms.txt`, official developer docs, and API references ahead of tutorials or blog posts. Collect three to five candidate URLs before reading any of them.
 
-4. **Read sources in parallel.** Spawn one subagent per source URL. Each subagent fetches the page, extracts relevant content, identifies links worth deepening, and returns a structured summary (content by topic area + links to follow). Subagents do not write files.
+If nothing usable comes back, stop and report what was searched, then ask for starting URLs rather than settling for tutorials.
 
-5. **Deepen.** For each subagent that returned links worth following, spawn child subagents per branch. Continue until content becomes repetitive or out of scope. Cap at ~10 additional pages total across all branches.
+## Step 4 — Read the sources
 
-6. **Consolidate.** Merge all subagent summaries (Context7 and web) by topic area. Identify which default topics have sufficient content and which custom topics emerged.
+`WebFetch` each URL in turn. No subagent tool is granted here, so the reads are serial and every fetched page lands in this context: reduce each page to notes by topic area, plus the links worth deepening, before fetching the next one.
 
-7. **Write topic files.** For each topic with content, write `<output-path>/<topic>.md` using the format in `references/file-format.md`. Orchestrator writes all files — never delegate file writing to a subagent.
+## Step 5 — Deepen
 
-8. **Write `sources.md`.** Write `<output-path>/sources.md` mapping each source slug to its URL (use `context7:<library-id>` as the URL for Context7 sources), description, and list of topic files it contributed to. Include sources that yielded no content, marked `no content extracted`.
+`WebFetch` the links worth following, still one at a time and still reducing each page to notes. Stop a branch once its content turns repetitive or leaves the topic, and cap the whole step at roughly ten additional pages — serial reads make that cap a real budget, not a formality.
 
-## Output format
+## Step 6 — Write
 
-- `<output-path>/<topic>.md` per topic with content — formatted per `references/file-format.md`
+Merge every set of notes, Context7 and web alike, by topic area, then write, in the output path:
-- `<output-path>/sources.md` — always produced; maps slug → URL, description, contributing files
 
-</steps>
+- `<topic>.md` for each topic area that has content, default or custom. Frontmatter carries `topic:` (the filename without `.md`) and `source_keys:` (kebab-case slugs matching `sources.md`); the body is prose in `##` sections, with no inline URLs.
+- `sources.md`, always, one `##` section per source — including sources that yielded nothing — with exactly these four fields:
 
-<checks>
+  ```markdown
+  - **URL:** <full URL>
+  - **Description:** <one-line summary>
+  - **Contributing files:** <topic files this source contributed to>
+  - **Status:** `extracted` | `no content extracted`
+  ```
 
-## Failure handling
+Spell those four field names exactly as given. The downstream provenance validator matches them literally; prose in their place parses as nothing, and the check passes having verified nothing.
 
-- Output path not provided — stop and ask; do not infer or default
+Read `references/file-format.md` when the four fields above do not settle the case: what a slug should be, the `context7-<library-slug>` slug and `context7:<library-id>` URL convention for a Context7 source, or what belongs in a topic body versus a verbatim copy of the source.
-- No sources found after websearch — report what was searched, ask user to provide starting URLs
-- Subagent returns no usable content — skip that source, log in `sources.md` as `no content extracted`
-- All topic files would be empty — stop, report what was searched, do not write any files
 
-## Self-check
+If no topic area has content, write nothing at all, `sources.md` included, and report what was searched.
-
-- [ ] Codebase scanned before any websearch was performed
-- [ ] Output path was explicitly provided — not inferred
-- [ ] `references/topics.md` and `references/file-format.md` read at step 1
-- [ ] Context7 resolution attempted before websearch when topic is a library/framework/API
-- [ ] Context7 calls made only at orchestrator step 2 — no subagent called `resolve-library-id` or `query-docs`
-- [ ] Context7 sources recorded in `sources.md` with `context7:<library-id>` as URL
-- [ ] No topic file written without content
-- [ ] `sources.md` written with all sources read (including those with no content extracted)
-- [ ] All file writes performed by the orchestrator, not subagents
-- [ ] Each topic file has `topic` and `source_keys` frontmatter fields
-- [ ] All source keys in topic files have a matching entry in `sources.md`
-- [ ] No files written outside the provided output path
-
-</checks>

plugins/bin/skills/tdd/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: tdd
-description: Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants a feature built or a bug fixed test-first, in a strict
+  red-green-refactor loop, one behaviour at a time. Not diagnosing an existing
+  bug -> `diagnose`. Not throwaway exploratory code -> `prototype`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Test-Driven Development
@@ -13,7 +18,7 @@ description: Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user
 
 **Bad tests** are coupled to implementation. They mock internal collaborators, test private methods, or verify through external means (like querying a database directly instead of using the interface). The warning sign: your test breaks when you refactor, but behavior hasn't changed. If you rename an internal function and tests fail, those tests were testing implementation, not behavior.
 
-See [tests.md](tests.md) for examples and [mocking.md](mocking.md) for mocking guidelines.
+If you need worked examples of the difference — a behaviour-level test beside the implementation-coupled version of the same check — read `references/tests.md`. If a test needs a collaborator faked, read `references/mocking.md` before reaching for a mock.
 
 ## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slices
 
@@ -44,14 +49,14 @@ RIGHT (vertical):
 
 ### 1. Planning
 
-When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary so that test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.
+When exploring the codebase, use the domain glossary so test names and interface vocabulary match the project's language, and respect ADRs in the area.
 
 Before writing any code:
 
 - [ ] Confirm with user what interface changes are needed
 - [ ] Confirm with user which behaviors to test (prioritize)
-- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
+- [ ] Identify opportunities for [deep modules](references/deep-modules.md) (small interface, deep implementation)
-- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](interface-design.md)
+- [ ] Design interfaces for [testability](references/interface-design.md)
 - [ ] List the behaviors to test (not implementation steps)
 - [ ] Get user approval on the plan
 
@@ -88,7 +93,7 @@ Rules:
 
 ### 4. Refactor
 
-After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](refactoring.md):
+After all tests pass, look for [refactor candidates](references/refactoring.md):
 
 - [ ] Extract duplication
 - [ ] Deepen modules (move complexity behind simple interfaces)

plugins/bin/skills/triage/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: triage
-description: Triage issues through a state machine driven by triage roles. Use when user wants to create an issue, triage issues, review incoming bugs or feature requests, prepare issues for an AFK agent, or manage issue workflow.
+description: >
+  Use when the user wants an issue created, triaged, or moved through the
+  tracker's triage states, or an issue prepared for an AFK agent. Not debugging
+  the bug itself -> `diagnose`. Not fleshing out a design -> `grill-with-docs`.
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
 # Triage
@@ -15,8 +20,8 @@ Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start
 
 ## Reference docs
 
-- [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
+- [agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
-- [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
+- [out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
 
 ## Roles
 
@@ -35,7 +40,7 @@ Five **state** roles:
 
 Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.
 
-These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
+These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. Resolve each canonical name against the tracker's live label set before applying it, using whichever tracker skill this install provides. If a name has no counterpart there, report the gap and ask the maintainer for the mapping — never substitute a guess.
 
 State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.
 
@@ -60,7 +65,7 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
 
 ## Triage a specific issue
 
-1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
+1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue (body, comments, labels, reporter, dates). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any prior rejection that resembles this issue.
 
 2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the issue. Wait for direction.
 
@@ -69,11 +74,11 @@ Show counts and a one-line summary per issue. Let the maintainer pick.
 4. **Grill (if needed).** If the issue needs fleshing out, run a `/grill-with-docs` session.
 
 5. **Apply the outcome:**
-   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).
+   - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([agent-brief.md](references/agent-brief.md)).
    - `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
    - `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
    - `wontfix` (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
-   - `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).
+   - `wontfix` (enhancement) — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([out-of-scope.md](references/out-of-scope.md)).
    - `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
 
 ## Quick state override

plugins/bin/skills/triage/references/agent-brief.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Writing Agent Briefs
 
-An agent brief is a structured comment posted on a GitHub issue when it moves to `ready-for-agent`. It is the authoritative specification that an AFK agent will work from. The original issue body and discussion are context — the agent brief is the contract.
+An agent brief is a structured comment posted on an issue in the issue tracker when it moves to `ready-for-agent`. It is the authoritative specification that an AFK agent will work from. The original issue body and discussion are context — the agent brief is the contract.
 
 ## Principles
 
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Describe **what** the system should do, not **how** to implement it. The agent w
 
 The agent needs to know when it's done. Every agent brief must have concrete, testable acceptance criteria. Each criterion should be independently verifiable.
 
-- **Good:** "Running `gh issue list --label needs-triage` returns issues that have been through initial classification"
+- **Good:** "Querying the issue tracker for the `needs-triage` label returns issues that have been through initial classification"
 - **Bad:** "Triage should work correctly"
 
 ### Explicit scope boundaries

plugins/bin/skills/write-docs/SKILL.md

@@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
 ---
 name: write-docs
-description: Write documentation for X, document this module, create docs for this feature. Use when the user wants to produce or update technical documentation derived from code, spec, or existing artifacts. Do NOT use when the user wants a PRD, ADR, decision doc, or skill file — those have dedicated skills.
+description: >
-version: "1.0"
+  Use when the user wants technical documentation produced or updated from code
+  or spec, every claim traced to a source — "write docs for X", "document this
+  module", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this". Not an ADR
+  or other decision record -> `grill-with-docs`. Not an external tool researched
+  from its docs -> `research`.
 updated: 2026-05-17
 when: invoked by explicit trigger ("write docs for X", "document this module", "create docs for this feature") or implicit request to produce technical documentation from code or spec
 metadata:
+  version: "1.0.0"
   category: implement
 source:
   - repo: anthropics/skills
@@ -35,7 +40,8 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
 - User says "write docs for X", "document this", "create docs for this feature", "write a README for this"
 
 **Do not use when:**
-- User wants a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `to-prd` or `grill-me`
+- User wants an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → `grill-with-docs`, which writes ADRs
+- User wants a PRD → no skill in this set produces one; say so rather than redirecting
 - User wants to document a skill file (skill files are self-describing)
 - User wants marketing or blog copy
 - Documentation requires tacit organisational knowledge that cannot be read from code or spec
@@ -88,7 +94,7 @@ You are a technical writer that produces documentation by reading code and spec
 - Stage skipped without a logged reason → flag and require the one-sentence log before continuing
 - Code behaviour is undocumentable (internal implementation detail, no public spec) → note as out-of-scope in the doc; do not invent an explanation
 - Reader Testing sub-agent fails on multiple questions → surface the failures, return to step 4; do not mark complete
-- Requested output is a PRD, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `to-prd`, `grill-me`, or `grill-with-docs`
+- Requested output is an ADR, decision doc, or architecture proposal → redirect to `grill-with-docs`; for a PRD, say no skill here produces one instead of redirecting
 
 ## Self-check
 

plugins/bin/skills/zoom-out/SKILL.md

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 name: zoom-out
 description: Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
 disable-model-invocation: true
+metadata:
+  version: "1.0.1"
 ---
 
-I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary vocabulary.
+I don't know this area of code well. Go up a layer of abstraction. Give me a map of all the relevant modules and callers, using the project's domain glossary.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# agentsmd-audit
-
-Audit a target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) for embedded secrets, structural completeness, and drift.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs a single combined pass across every AGENTS.md file in a repo (root and any nested monorepo files): flags embedded secrets/credentials, checks structure against the agents.md common-sections checklist, and resolves referenced commands/paths against the actual repo to catch stale documentation. Outputs a compact findings report — findings only, grouped by dimension, each with Why and Fix. Never inspects provider-specific adapter files (CLAUDE.md, etc.) and never writes or fixes anything.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/agentsmd-audit
-```
-
-Provide the path to the repo root to audit when invoking.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` | Scans AGENTS.md files for embedded secrets, API keys, tokens, connection strings |
-| `scripts/validate-structure.sh` | Checks for empty/placeholder content, common-sections checklist, nested-vs-root duplication |
-| `scripts/validate-drift.sh` | Resolves referenced npm/make commands and file paths against the repo |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — sources that informed this skill and which files each contributed to |
-| `scripts/README.md` | Directory documentation for `scripts/` |
-| `tests/README.md` | (source-only) Bats test dependency and run instructions |
-| `tests/validate-secrets.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-structure.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-structure.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-drift.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-drift.sh` |
-
-Rows marked **(source-only)** exist in the authoring source (`.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/`) but are
-not present in an installed plugin: `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` strips `<category>/<name>/tests`
-when it generates the flat mirror, because these are dev-time fixtures no plugin host needs to
-discover (ADR-0017). Run them from a repo checkout, not from an install.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/SKILL.md

@@ -1,20 +1,11 @@
 ---
 name: agentsmd-audit
 description: >
-  Use when the user wants to review a repo's AGENTS.md file, says "audit this
+  Use when the user wants a repo's AGENTS.md audited for secrets, structure
-  AGENTS.md", "check my AGENTS.md", "is this AGENTS.md any good", or wants to
+  and drift — "is this AGENTS.md safe to commit" — or after a hand-edit
-  know if AGENTS.md is safe to commit — even if they don't use the word
+  outside `agentsmd-author`.
-  "audit". Also invoke proactively after agentsmd-author creates or updates
+  Not converting a provider file -> `provider-adapter-author`.
-  AGENTS.md, or after a hand-edit made outside agentsmd-author. Audits a
+  Not writing AGENTS.md -> `agentsmd-author`.
-  target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) — root and any nested monorepo files — for
-  embedded secrets/credentials, structural completeness against the
-  agents.md common-sections checklist, and drift (referenced commands or
-  paths that no longer resolve against the repo). Produces a compact
-  findings report (findings only, no PASS noise) with Why and Fix per
-  finding. Do not use to audit CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules, or other
-  provider-specific adapter files — that's provider-adapter-author's
-  self-contained concern. Do not use to fix or write AGENTS.md content — use
-  agentsmd-author instead.
 allowed-tools: Bash Read
 metadata:
   category: docs
@@ -23,14 +14,13 @@ metadata:
     - context7-websites-agents-md
     - context7-agentsmd-agents-md
     - governance-secrets-hard-prohibition
-  version: "0.1.1"
+  version: "0.1.2"
 ---
 
 ## Gotchas
 
 - Always run all three checks — this skill does a single combined pass, not staged/gated passes. Don't skip structure or drift checks just because a secrets FAIL was found.
-- Never inspect or mention provider-specific adapter files (`CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`, etc.) — that's out of scope. If one exists and duplicates AGENTS.md content, that's `provider-adapter-author`'s concern, not this skill's.
+- Never inspect or mention provider-specific adapter files (`CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`, etc.) — that's out of scope.
-- A missing common section (e.g. no "Security" heading) is informational, not a failure — not every repo needs every section from the checklist. Only flag a FAIL when the file is empty, entirely unfilled placeholder text, or contains a real embedded secret/stale reference.
 - Gather findings internally; don't narrate PASS/FAIL per check as you go — surface them only in the final report.
 
 ## Step 1 — Run the validators
@@ -41,7 +31,7 @@ bash scripts/validate-structure.sh <repo-root>
 bash scripts/validate-drift.sh <repo-root>
 ```
 
-Each script walks the repo for every `AGENTS.md` file (root and nested, excluding `.git`, `node_modules`, `vendor`, and similar) and prints `FAIL`/`INFO`/`SUGGESTION` lines with `Why`/`Fix` (or `Note`) per finding. A nonzero exit means at least one FAIL was found in that dimension. If a script cannot execute (`python3` unavailable, Bash denied), fall back to manual review: scan for real-looking credentials, check common sections are present, and spot-check a few referenced commands/paths by hand.
+Each script walks the repo for every `AGENTS.md` file (root and nested, excluding `.git`, `node_modules`, `vendor`, and similar) and prints `FAIL` lines, plus `INFO`/`SUGGESTION` where applicable, with `Why`/`Fix` (or `Note`) per finding. A nonzero exit means at least one FAIL was found in that dimension. If a script cannot execute (`python3` unavailable, Bash denied), fall back to manual review: scan for real-looking credentials, check common sections are present, and spot-check a few referenced commands/paths by hand. Grade a manual finding the way the scripts grade theirs: a missing common section (e.g. no "Security" heading) is informational, not a failure — not every repo needs every section from the checklist. Only flag a FAIL when the file is empty, entirely unfilled placeholder text, or contains a real embedded secret/stale reference.
 
 ## Step 2 — Report
 
@@ -53,16 +43,4 @@ Checked: secrets · structure · drift
 
 Then output only findings that were found, in this order within a repo: `### Secrets`, `### Structure`, `### Drift`. Omit a dimension heading entirely if it produced nothing — its absence confirms it passed. Report each finding verbatim as emitted by the scripts (they already carry file:line, Why/Fix or Note).
 
-Close with a result block:
+Close with a `## Result` block holding one line: `PASS`, `PASS (N suggestions)`, or `FAIL (N fails · M suggestions)`, each optionally followed by ` · P info`. Omit the suggestion count when there are none, and omit `· P info` when there are none. INFO and SUGGESTION findings are observational — they never flip PASS to FAIL. Do not fix anything — this skill reports and proposes only. Point the user to `agentsmd-author` to apply fixes.
-
-```text
-## Result
-
-PASS
-PASS · P info
-PASS (N suggestions) · P info
-FAIL (N fails)
-FAIL (N fails) · P info
-```
-
-INFO and SUGGESTION findings are observational — they never flip PASS to FAIL. Do not fix anything — this skill reports and proposes only. Point the user to `agentsmd-author` to apply fixes.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/agentsmd-author/README.md

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-# agentsmd-author
-
-Create or update a target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) by exploring the repo for real conventions.
-
-## What it does
-
-Explores a target repo (package manager scripts, Makefile/task runner, CI config, linter config, existing docs) and writes or updates `AGENTS.md` with only verified commands and conventions — never invented ones. Supports nested monorepo placement, following the agents.md standard's nearest-file-wins precedence. Closes every run by invoking `agentsmd-audit` inline, and hands off to `provider-adapter-author` when an existing provider-specific file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) now duplicates content AGENTS.md owns.
-
-## Before you start
-
-The `agentsmd-audit` skill must be available (co-installed in the `core` plugin) — this skill invokes it as a mandatory closeout step.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/agentsmd-author
-```
-
-Provide the target repo root (defaults to the current directory) and, if relevant, which subdirectory should get a nested AGENTS.md.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `references/content-guide.md` | Section-by-section AGENTS.md content guidance, a worked example, and monorepo/nested-file precedence rules |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — sources that informed this skill and which files each contributed to |

plugins/core/.apm/skills/agentsmd-author/SKILL.md

@@ -1,20 +1,10 @@
 ---
 name: agentsmd-author
 description: >
-  Use when the user wants to create or update a repo's AGENTS.md file
+  Use when the user wants a repo's AGENTS.md written or updated, root or
-  ("write an AGENTS.md for this repo", "add setup/test instructions for
+  nested, including "document this for AI coding tools". Writes only verified
-  agents", "update AGENTS.md", "give this package its own AGENTS.md") — even
+  conventions. Not review-only -> `agentsmd-audit`. Not converting CLAUDE.md ->
-  if they don't name the file explicitly, e.g. "document this for AI coding
+  `provider-adapter-author`.
-  tools" or "make sure agents know how to run tests here". Writes/updates
-  AGENTS.md by exploring the target repo for real build, test, lint, and
-  style conventions — never invents commands. Supports nested monorepo
-  placement (a subdirectory can get its own AGENTS.md following
-  nearest-file-wins precedence). Closes every run by invoking agentsmd-audit
-  inline, and calls provider-adapter-author when an existing provider file
-  (CLAUDE.md, etc.) now duplicates what AGENTS.md owns. Do not use to review
-  an existing AGENTS.md without changing it — use agentsmd-audit instead. Do
-  not use to convert CLAUDE.md/.cursor/rules into a thin adapter — use
-  provider-adapter-author instead.
 allowed-tools: Bash Read Write Edit
 metadata:
   category: docs
@@ -22,16 +12,13 @@ metadata:
     - agents-md-official
     - context7-websites-agents-md
     - context7-agentsmd-agents-md
-  version: "0.1.1"
+  version: "0.1.2"
 ---
 
 ## Gotchas
 
 - Never invent a command. Every line under a setup/test/build section must come from something you actually found in the repo (`package.json` scripts, a `Makefile` target, a CI workflow step, a README). If you can't verify a command, don't include it.
-- AGENTS.md has no required schema — don't force every common-sections-checklist heading into every repo. Include only sections that reflect something real about this repo; a thin, accurate file beats a padded, generic one.
+- Never write to a provider file yourself, in any circumstance: `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md` and their equivalents are `provider-adapter-author`'s to own. That holds even when the user asks for one in the same breath as AGENTS.md, and even when the file is merely stale or missing a pointer rather than duplicating anything. Detect it and hand off.
-- Nested placement is for genuinely different conventions, not convenience. Only create a subdirectory AGENTS.md when that subtree has its own build tool, stack, or conventions distinct from the root — otherwise you're duplicating content the root already covers, which the nearest-file-wins rule doesn't merge back together.
-- This skill never touches CLAUDE.md, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `copilot-instructions.md`, or similar provider files directly — that's `provider-adapter-author`'s job. Detect and hand off; don't reconcile it yourself.
-- This skill never audits on its own judgment — the closing `agentsmd-audit` invocation is mandatory, not optional, even when the change looks trivial.
 
 ## Step 1 — Explore the target repo
 
@@ -40,17 +27,17 @@ Before writing anything, gather real facts: package manager and scripts (`packag
 ## Step 2 — Decide placement
 
 - No `AGENTS.md` at the repo root yet → create one there first, covering whole-repo conventions.
-- A subdirectory has materially different build/test tooling or conventions than the root → create or update a nested `AGENTS.md` there, scoped to what's different. Don't repeat root-level content — the nearest-file-wins rule means the nested file is read alone, not merged with the root.
+- A subdirectory has materially different build/test tooling or conventions than the root → create or update a nested `AGENTS.md` there, scoped to what's different. Convenience is not a reason to create one — without a distinct stack you are duplicating content the root already covers. **Don't repeat root-level content** in a nested file: the nearest-file-wins rule means it is read alone, never merged back with the root.
 - Otherwise → update the existing file(s) in place.
 
 ## Step 3 — Write or update
 
-Use only sections that reflect something real about the repo — never fill in every common-sections-checklist heading just because it exists. Read `references/content-guide.md` for section-by-section guidance, a worked example, and what separates useful content from generic padding, before writing.
+AGENTS.md has no required schema. Use only sections that reflect something real about the repo — never fill in every common-sections-checklist heading just because it exists, because a thin accurate file beats a padded generic one. Read `references/content-guide.md` for section-by-section guidance, a worked example, and what separates useful content from generic padding, before writing.
 
 ## Step 4 — Check for an existing provider file
 
-Look for `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, or similar in the target repo. If one exists and now duplicates content the AGENTS.md you just wrote/updated already owns, invoke the `provider-adapter-author` skill on it to reconcile — don't rewrite it yourself.
+Look for `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, or similar in the target repo. If one exists, invoke the `provider-adapter-author` skill on it to reconcile — whether it duplicates content the AGENTS.md you just wrote/updated now owns, or is merely stale or missing a pointer to it. Never edit it yourself in either case.
 
 ## Step 5 — Audit and report
 
-Invoke the `agentsmd-audit` skill directly on the AGENTS.md file(s) you just wrote or updated. Resolve any FAIL findings before considering the work done — re-invoke this skill's own writing steps to fix them, then re-run the audit, same as any other close-the-loop check. Report what was created/changed, whether a provider file was reconciled, and the audit's final result.
+Invoke the `agentsmd-audit` skill on the target repo root — its validators take a `<repo-root>` and walk the tree for every AGENTS.md themselves; there is no per-file entry point. This closeout is mandatory, not optional, even when the change looks trivial — never sign the work off on your own judgment. Resolve any FAIL findings before considering the work done — re-invoke this skill's own writing steps to fix them, then re-run the audit, same as any other close-the-loop check. Report what was created/changed, whether a provider file was reconciled, and the audit's final result.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# provider-adapter-author
-
-Convert a target repo's provider-specific instruction file (CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules, copilot-instructions.md, etc.) into a thin adapter over AGENTS.md.
-
-## What it does
-
-Detects a provider-specific AI instruction file in a target repo, diffs it against the repo's `AGENTS.md`, and rewrites it down to a minimal reference — an `@AGENTS.md`-style import for providers that support one, or a text pointer for those that don't — plus only genuinely provider-specific additions. Self-validates its own output with a bundled deterministic script (no LLM judgment, no separate audit skill) before finishing.
-
-## Before you start
-
-The target repo must already have an `AGENTS.md`. If it doesn't, run `agentsmd-author` first — this skill never creates or edits `AGENTS.md` itself.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/provider-adapter-author
-```
-
-Provide the path to the provider-specific file to convert (and the target repo root, if not inferable). Can be invoked directly, or composed into by `agentsmd-author` when it detects an existing provider file with content overlapping AGENTS.md.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — the in-repo ADR precedent this skill's design is modeled on |
-| `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` | Self-check gate: reference to AGENTS.md present, no excessive duplication, adapter stays thin |
-| `scripts/README.md` | Directory documentation for `scripts/` |
-| `tests/README.md` | (source-only) Bats test dependency and run instructions |
-| `tests/validate-adapter.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` |
-
-Rows marked **(source-only)** exist in the authoring source (`.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/`)
-but are not present in an installed plugin: `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` strips
-`<category>/<name>/tests` when it generates the flat mirror, because these are dev-time fixtures no
-plugin host needs to discover (ADR-0017). Run them from a repo checkout, not from an install.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/SKILL.md

@@ -1,43 +1,41 @@
 ---
 name: provider-adapter-author
 description: >
-  Use when the user wants to convert a provider-specific AI instruction file
+  Use when a provider file (CLAUDE.md, .cursor rules, copilot-instructions)
-  (CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules/*.mdc, copilot-instructions.md, etc.) into a
+  duplicating the repo's AGENTS.md should be cut to a thin adapter — "make
-  thin adapter that defers to a repo's AGENTS.md — e.g. "reduce duplication
+  CLAUDE.md just import AGENTS.md".
-  between CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md", "make CLAUDE.md just import AGENTS.md"
+  Not writing the AGENTS file -> `agentsmd-author`.
-  — even if the pattern isn't named explicitly. Also invoke when
+  Not auditing the AGENTS file -> `agentsmd-audit`.
-  agentsmd-author detects an existing provider file overlapping with
-  AGENTS.md it just wrote. Detects redundant content in a provider file
-  relative to AGENTS.md and rewrites it down to a minimal reference (an
-  `@AGENTS.md`-style import where supported, or a text pointer otherwise)
-  plus genuinely provider-specific additions. Self-validates via a bundled
-  deterministic script before finishing. Do not use to write or audit
-  AGENTS.md itself — use agentsmd-author or agentsmd-audit.
 allowed-tools: Bash Read Edit Write
 metadata:
   category: docs
   source_keys:
     - adr-0002-0003-two-tier-claude-md
-  version: "0.1.0"
+  version: "0.1.1"
 ---
 
 ## Gotchas
 
-- Not every provider supports cross-file imports. Claude Code does — a `CLAUDE.md` can consist of nothing but one or more `@path` lines (e.g. `@AGENTS.md`), with no other content required. Cursor's `.cursor/rules/*.mdc` and GitHub Copilot's `copilot-instructions.md` have no native import mechanism as of current tooling — for those, "thin" means a short text pointer to AGENTS.md plus only what that tool actually needs, not a literal import line. Pass `--no-import-syntax` to `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` for these providers.
+- Assume a provider has no cross-file import mechanism until you have confirmed it has one. Claude Code is the exception, not the rule: a `CLAUDE.md` may consist of nothing but `@path` lines, while the same `@AGENTS.md` line in a Cursor rule or a Copilot instructions file is inert text no tool resolves. Pass `--no-import-syntax` to `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` for those providers.
-- This skill never creates or edits `AGENTS.md` itself. If the target repo has no `AGENTS.md` yet, stop and point the user to `agentsmd-author` first — there's nothing to adapt to.
+
-- Only strip content from the provider file that's genuinely redundant with AGENTS.md. Provider-specific material (IDE settings, tool-only syntax, model-specific instructions) stays — the goal is thin, not empty.
+- Works standalone or composed-into by `agentsmd-author` — behave identically either way; do not assume a caller skill exists. Detect the provider file, confirm `AGENTS.md`, and run the closeout validator yourself in both cases (`references/provider-matrix.md`).
-- Works standalone or composed-into by `agentsmd-author` — behave identically either way; don't assume a caller skill exists.
 
 ## Step 1 — Detect
 
-Look for known provider instruction files in the target repo: `CLAUDE.md` (repo root, and any deployed copies), `.cursor/rules/*.mdc`, `.github/copilot-instructions.md`, and similar tool-specific files. Confirm `AGENTS.md` exists at the repo root — if not, stop and tell the user to run `agentsmd-author` first.
+Find the provider instruction file to convert. Before searching, read `references/provider-matrix.md` — skip it only when the target is already a known root `CLAUDE.md`, which is the common case.
+
+Then confirm `AGENTS.md` exists at the repo root. If it does not, stop and tell the user to run `agentsmd-author` first — there is nothing to adapt to.
 
 ## Step 2 — Diff and rewrite
 
 Read the provider file and `AGENTS.md` side by side. Separate the provider file's content into two buckets: lines that restate what `AGENTS.md` already owns (universal rules, conventions, project overview) versus lines that are genuinely provider-specific (tool syntax, IDE behavior, model-specific instructions). Rewrite the provider file:
 
-- **Providers with import syntax** (Claude Code): replace the redundant bucket with an `@AGENTS.md` (or correct relative path) import line, keep the provider-specific bucket below it.
+- **Providers with import syntax** (Claude Code): replace the redundant bucket with an `@AGENTS.md` (or correct relative path) import on a line of its own, keep the provider-specific bucket below it. An import folded into a sentence is not the thin-adapter shape and `scripts/validate-adapter.sh` will not credit it — nor one inside a code fence, an indented block, or an HTML comment, nor one whose path does not resolve to a real, non-empty file on disk.
-- **Providers without import syntax** (Cursor, Copilot, etc.): replace the redundant bucket with a short pointer sentence mentioning `AGENTS.md`, keep the provider-specific bucket.
+- **Providers without import syntax** (Cursor, Copilot, etc.): replace the redundant bucket with a short sentence pointing at `AGENTS.md` ("See AGENTS.md at the repo root for ..."), keep the provider-specific bucket. A bare or negated mention is not a pointer and will not be credited.
+
+The provider file is the only file this skill ever writes. Never create or edit `AGENTS.md` — not in this step, not in any step, whatever the payoff looks like.
+
+Strip only what is genuinely redundant. Provider-specific material stays even when it is short — the goal is thin, not empty.
 
 ## Step 3 — Self-validate
 
@@ -47,7 +45,7 @@ Run the bundled check before finishing — this is the skill's own closeout gate
 bash scripts/validate-adapter.sh [--no-import-syntax] [--max-lines N] <adapter-file> <agents-md-file>
 ```
 
-Fix any `FAIL` and re-run until it exits `0`.
+Fix any `FAIL` by editing the provider file, and re-run until it exits `0`. Exits `2` and `3` are not `FAIL`s and nothing was graded under either, so neither is a reason to touch the adapter: `2` means the invocation or the input is wrong (a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown option, or a file that is not UTF-8), and `3` means a named file exists but could not be read.
 
 ## Step 4 — Report
 

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/references/provider-matrix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+---
+source_keys:
+  - adr-0002-0003-two-tier-claude-md
+---
+
+# Known provider instruction files
+
+Which files to look for when detecting a provider-specific instruction file, whether each provider
+resolves a cross-file import, and what a thin adapter therefore looks like for it.
+
+| Provider | File(s) | Import syntax | Thin adapter shape | Validator flag |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Claude Code | `CLAUDE.md` at the repo root, plus any deployed copies | Yes — `@path` lines, e.g. `@AGENTS.md` | One or more `@` import lines; no other content is required | none |
+| Cursor | `.cursor/rules/*.mdc` | No | A short sentence pointing at `AGENTS.md`, plus the rule's own frontmatter and provider-specific body | `--no-import-syntax` |
+| GitHub Copilot | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | No | A short sentence pointing at `AGENTS.md`, plus Copilot-only instructions | `--no-import-syntax` |
+| Anything else | tool-specific instruction file at whatever path the tool documents | Assume no | Text pointer, as above | `--no-import-syntax` |
+
+A provider not listed here is not evidence it has an import mechanism. Confirm against that tool's
+own documentation before emitting an `@`-style line; an unresolved import reads as literal text and
+silently drops every rule the adapter was supposed to defer to.
+
+Detection is a search, not a lookup: a repo may hold more than one of these, and each one converts
+independently against the same `AGENTS.md`.
+
+## Standalone and composed runs behave identically
+
+This skill is reached two ways: invoked directly by a user, and composed into by `agentsmd-author`
+once it has written or updated the repo's `AGENTS.md`. Behave identically either way — do not
+assume a caller skill exists. Detect the provider file yourself, confirm `AGENTS.md` yourself, and
+run the closeout validator yourself, rather than treating any step as already done by the caller or
+as something the caller will do afterwards. No handshake exists to rely on, and no state is
+passed in beyond the file paths.

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/references/sources.md

@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@
 - **URL:** (in-repo precedent — not an external source or plugin research corpus entry)
 - **Description:** This repo's own two-tier CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md pattern: AGENTS.md is the provider-agnostic source of always-on rules; provider-specific files (CLAUDE.md) become thin adapters that import it (`@AGENTS.md` plus provider-specific additions). Grounds this skill's entire adapter-conversion design — the "thin adapter" shape, the `@`-import convention, and the size/duplication expectations enforced by `scripts/validate-adapter.sh`.
 - **Research doc:** docs/adr/0002-two-tier-claude-md.md, docs/adr/0003-agents-md-provider-agnostic-entry-point.md, providers/claude-code/CLAUDE.md (in-repo ADRs and a live example, not a plugin research corpus entry; referenced here since this skill's design is modeled directly on an existing implementation rather than external research)
-- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md
+- **Contributing files:** SKILL.md, references/provider-matrix.md
 - **Status:** `extracted`

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/scripts/README.md

@@ -4,6 +4,25 @@ Deterministic self-check this skill shells out to instead of relying on LLM judg
 
 | File | Purpose |
 |------|---------|
-| `validate-adapter.sh` | Checks a rewritten provider file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) has a reference to AGENTS.md, doesn't duplicate its content, and stays under a thin-file line threshold |
+| `validate-adapter.sh` | Checks a rewritten provider file (CLAUDE.md, etc.) has a working reference to AGENTS.md, doesn't duplicate its content, and stays under a thin-file line threshold |
 
-Takes `<adapter-file> <agents-md-file>`, with optional `--no-import-syntax` and `--max-lines N` flags. Prints `FAIL` findings to stdout and exits non-zero on any failure.
+Takes exactly `<adapter-file> <agents-md-file>`, with optional `--no-import-syntax` and `--max-lines N` flags (also accepted as `--max-lines=N`). A third positional argument or an unknown option is an error, not something quietly ignored.
+
+## What counts as a reference to AGENTS.md
+
+Both modes require the named path to be a real path segment ending in `AGENTS.md` — `AGENTS.md` or `…/AGENTS.md`, not `NOTAGENTS.md` — that resolves on disk, relative to the adapter file, to a non-empty file. An adapter deferring to a path that is not there defers to nothing, so the check has to touch the disk rather than pattern-match the line.
+
+A reference only counts where something would actually resolve it. A line inside a fenced code block, an indented code block, or an HTML comment is not credited in either mode: Claude Code resolves an import in none of those, so a fenced `@AGENTS.md` is the silent-drop failure this gate exists to catch, not a pass.
+
+Default mode wants a real import: `@AGENTS.md` alone on its own line, indented no more than three spaces. `--no-import-syntax` wants a prose pointer that reads as one — the sentence naming `AGENTS.md` must carry a deference cue (see, read, refer to, documented in, conventions, …) and must not be negated. `Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete.` and `We deleted AGENTS.md last year.` name the file while pointing the reader away from it, and neither is a pointer.
+
+## Exit codes
+
+The distinction matters because the skill's closeout tells the agent to fix any non-zero exit by editing the provider file. That is right for exactly one of these.
+
+| Code | Meaning | What to do |
+|------|---------|------------|
+| `0` | Passes every check | Nothing |
+| `1` | One or more `FAIL` findings printed to stdout — empty adapter, no working reference to AGENTS.md, excessive duplication, or not thin | Edit the provider file |
+| `2` | Usage or input error: a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown option, a path that is not a file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing was graded, so there is no `FAIL` line | Fix the invocation or the file's encoding — do not edit the adapter |
+| `3` | A named input file exists but could not be read (permissions, I/O error). Nothing was graded and the adapter's contents are unknown | Fix the file's readability — do not edit the adapter |

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/scripts/validate-adapter.sh

@@ -14,27 +14,85 @@ Arguments:
   adapter-file     Path to the provider-specific file to check.
   agents-md-file   Path to the AGENTS.md file it should defer to.
 
+  Exactly two positional arguments are accepted. Extra ones are rejected
+  rather than ignored: a third path silently graded nothing but the first
+  two, so a typo'd invocation passed against the wrong file.
+
 Options:
   --no-import-syntax  The target provider has no native cross-file import
-                       mechanism. Accept a plain-text pointer mention of
+                       mechanism. Require a plain-text pointer line naming
-                       "AGENTS.md" instead of requiring an @import-style line.
+                       "AGENTS.md" instead of an @import-style line; an
+                       @AGENTS.md line alone does not satisfy it, because
+                       such a provider never resolves it. Without this flag
+                       an actual @import line is required, and naming
+                       AGENTS.md in prose alone does not satisfy it.
   --max-lines N        Max non-blank lines allowed in the adapter file before
-                       it's considered no longer "thin". Default: 60.
+                       it's considered no longer "thin". Must be a
+                       non-negative integer. Default: 60.
   --help, -h           Show this help and exit 0.
+  --                   End of options; every later argument is positional.
+
+Both flags also accept the --flag=value form (--max-lines=40). An unknown
+option is reported as an unknown option, not as a missing file.
+
+What counts as a reference:
+
+  In both modes the named path must be a real path segment ending in
+  AGENTS.md ("AGENTS.md" or ".../AGENTS.md" — not NOTAGENTS.md), and it must
+  resolve on disk, relative to the adapter file, to a non-empty file. An
+  adapter deferring to a path that is not there defers to nothing.
+
+  A mention inside a fenced code block, an indented code block, or an HTML
+  comment is not credited in either mode. Nothing resolves those, so an
+  adapter whose only "import" is fenced silently defers to nothing.
+
+  With --no-import-syntax the pointer must read as a pointer: the sentence
+  naming AGENTS.md has to carry a deference cue (see, read, refer to,
+  documented in, conventions, ...) and must not be a negation ("do not read
+  AGENTS.md", "we deleted AGENTS.md"). A bare mention is not a pointer.
 
 Exit codes:
   0  Adapter file passes all checks
   1  One or more checks failed (empty file, no reference to AGENTS.md,
      excessive duplication, or file too long)
+  2  Usage or input error — a bad, missing, or extra argument, an unknown
+     option, a path that is not a file, or a file that is not UTF-8. Nothing
+     was graded, so there is no FAIL line and no adapter edit to make: fix
+     the invocation or the file's encoding and re-run. Kept distinct from 1
+     because the skill's own closeout tells the agent to fix every non-zero
+     exit by editing the provider file, which for a mistyped flag edits the
+     wrong file forever.
+  3  A named input file exists but could not be read (permissions, a
+     directory swapped in mid-run, I/O error). Also not a FAIL: nothing was
+     graded and the adapter's contents are unknown, so editing it is
+     guesswork. Fix the file's readability and re-run.
 EOF
 }
 
 NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX=0
 MAX_LINES=60
 ARGS=()
+END_OF_OPTS=0
+
+require_int() {
+  # $1 = the value to validate
+  if [[ ! "$1" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
+    echo "Error: --max-lines expects a non-negative integer, got '$1'." >&2
+    exit 2
+  fi
+}
 
 while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
+  if [[ $END_OF_OPTS -eq 1 ]]; then
+    ARGS+=("$1")
+    shift
+    continue
+  fi
   case "$1" in
+    --)
+      END_OF_OPTS=1
+      shift
+      ;;
     --help|-h)
       usage
       exit 0
@@ -43,10 +101,38 @@ while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
       NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX=1
       shift
       ;;
+    --no-import-syntax=*)
+      echo "Error: --no-import-syntax is a flag and takes no value (got '$1')." >&2
+      exit 2
+      ;;
     --max-lines)
-      MAX_LINES="${2:-}"
+      if [[ $# -lt 2 ]]; then
+        echo "Error: --max-lines requires a value (a non-negative integer)." >&2
+        exit 2
+      fi
+      MAX_LINES="$2"
+      require_int "$MAX_LINES"
       shift 2
       ;;
+    --max-lines=*)
+      MAX_LINES="${1#--max-lines=}"
+      if [[ -z "$MAX_LINES" ]]; then
+        echo "Error: --max-lines requires a value (a non-negative integer)." >&2
+        exit 2
+      fi
+      require_int "$MAX_LINES"
+      shift
+      ;;
+    -*)
+      # Reported as an unknown option rather than falling through to the
+      # positional bucket, where it used to surface as "'--bogus' is not a
+      # file" — the right exit code attached to a diagnostic that sends the
+      # reader looking for a path they never typed.
+      echo "Error: unknown option '$1'." >&2
+      echo "" >&2
+      usage >&2
+      exit 2
+      ;;
     *)
       ARGS+=("$1")
       shift
@@ -58,7 +144,14 @@ if [[ ${#ARGS[@]} -lt 2 ]]; then
   echo "Error: adapter-file and agents-md-file are required." >&2
   echo "" >&2
   usage >&2
-  exit 1
+  exit 2
+fi
+
+if [[ ${#ARGS[@]} -gt 2 ]]; then
+  echo "Error: expected exactly 2 positional arguments (adapter-file and agents-md-file), got ${#ARGS[@]}: ${ARGS[*]}." >&2
+  echo "" >&2
+  usage >&2
+  exit 2
 fi
 
 python3 -u - "${ARGS[0]}" "${ARGS[1]}" "$NO_IMPORT_SYNTAX" "$MAX_LINES" <<'PYTHON'
@@ -70,17 +163,80 @@ adapter_path, agents_md_path, no_import_syntax, max_lines = sys.argv[1:5]
 no_import_syntax = no_import_syntax == "1"
 max_lines = int(max_lines)
 
+EXIT_FAIL = 1
+EXIT_USAGE = 2
+EXIT_UNREADABLE = 3
+
 if not os.path.isfile(adapter_path):
     print(f"Error: '{adapter_path}' is not a file.", file=sys.stderr)
-    sys.exit(1)
+    sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
 if not os.path.isfile(agents_md_path):
     print(f"Error: '{agents_md_path}' is not a file.", file=sys.stderr)
-    sys.exit(1)
+    sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
 
-with open(adapter_path, encoding="utf-8", errors="replace") as f:
+
-    adapter_content = f.read()
+def read_text(path):
-with open(agents_md_path, encoding="utf-8", errors="replace") as f:
+    r"""File contents as text, UTF-8, every BOM stripped.
-    agents_md_content = f.read()
+
+    The BOM strip is not cosmetic. IMPORT_RE anchors on `^ {0,3}@`, and a BOM
+    is not whitespace in Python, so a CLAUDE.md saved by an editor that emits
+    one had its first line — the `@AGENTS.md` import, which is the whole
+    adapter — silently treated as prose. The check then said "no reference to
+    AGENTS.md" and told the author to add the line already sitting in front of
+    them. Same class of silent BOM miss recorded in scripts/skill-size-check.sh;
+    strip it at the reader so no later check has to know about it.
+
+    Every U+FEFF goes, not just one at offset 0. Stripping exactly the first
+    one left the mirror-image false FAIL for a doubled BOM (two concatenated
+    files, or a tool that re-adds one) and for a BOM mid-file at the head of
+    the import line. U+FEFF has no meaning as a character in a markdown
+    instruction file, so removing all of them cannot lose signal.
+
+    Decoding is strict, not errors="replace". Replacement mangles the file and
+    the checks then grade the mangling: a UTF-16 adapter whose first line is
+    `@AGENTS.md` decoded to interleaved NULs and failed as "no reference",
+    which is a true FAIL for a false reason and points the fix at the wrong
+    thing. But strict UTF-8 alone does not catch it — BOM-less UTF-16LE/BE and
+    UTF-32LE are *valid* UTF-8, because NUL is a legal code point, so they
+    decoded clean and produced exactly that false diagnosis anyway. The NUL
+    byte is the complete signal and is checked first: no plausible markdown
+    adapter contains one, and every UTF-16/32 encoding of ASCII is full of
+    them. A file this gate cannot read gets an encoding diagnostic and exit 2,
+    the same policy the ADR-0020 validators' read_text() uses.
+
+    A file that exists but cannot be read at all is neither a pass nor a FAIL —
+    nothing was graded — so it exits 3 rather than 1. Exit 1 sends the skill's
+    closeout into "fix the FAIL by editing the provider file", which for a file
+    it cannot open is an instruction to edit blind.
+    """
+    try:
+        with open(path, "rb") as fh:
+            raw = fh.read()
+    except OSError as exc:
+        print(f"Error: '{path}' exists but could not be read ({exc.strerror}). "
+              "Nothing was checked — fix whatever is blocking the read "
+              "(permissions, ownership, the underlying device) and re-run; do "
+              "not edit the adapter on the strength of this.", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(EXIT_UNREADABLE)
+    if b"\x00" in raw:
+        print(f"Error: '{path}' is not valid UTF-8 — it contains NUL bytes, so "
+              "it is almost certainly UTF-16 or UTF-32 (with or without a BOM). "
+              "Re-save it as UTF-8; this check does not guess at other "
+              "encodings.", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
+    try:
+        text = raw.decode("utf-8")
+    except UnicodeDecodeError as exc:
+        print(f"Error: '{path}' is not valid UTF-8 ({exc.reason} at byte "
+              f"{exc.start}) — re-save it as UTF-8; this check does not guess "
+              "at other encodings.", file=sys.stderr)
+        sys.exit(EXIT_USAGE)
+    return text.replace("\ufeff", "")
+
+
+adapter_content = read_text(adapter_path)
+agents_md_content = read_text(agents_md_path)
+adapter_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(adapter_path))
 
 has_fail = False
 
@@ -89,30 +245,229 @@ if not adapter_content.strip():
     print("      Why: An empty adapter carries no reference to AGENTS.md and no provider-specific content.")
     print("      Fix: Add at least an import (or text pointer) to AGENTS.md.")
     print()
-    sys.exit(1)
+    sys.exit(EXIT_FAIL)
 
-IMPORT_RE = re.compile(r'(?m)^\s*@\S*AGENTS\.md\s*$')
+
-lines = adapter_content.splitlines()
+# --- Inert regions -----------------------------------------------------------
-import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if IMPORT_RE.match(ln)]
+#
+# A reference only counts where something would actually resolve it. Fenced
+# code blocks, indented code blocks and HTML comments are shown to the reader
+# (or hidden from them) as literal text; Claude Code resolves an @import in
+# none of them. Without this, a ```-fenced `@AGENTS.md` — the exact
+# copy-the-example-into-the-file mistake this gate exists to catch — exited 0
+# with the adapter deferring to nothing.
+#
+# Indented code blocks are handled by IMPORT_RE's `^ {0,3}` instead of by the
+# mask: four leading spaces is what opens an indented code block in CommonMark,
+# so an import has to sit within three. The mask deliberately does not apply
+# that rule to prose pointers, where four-space indentation is ordinary list
+# continuation rather than code.
+FENCE_RE = re.compile(r'^( {0,3})(`{3,}|~{3,})(.*)$')
+COMMENT_RE = re.compile(r'<!--.*?(?:-->|\Z)', re.DOTALL)
+
+
+def line_offsets(text):
+    """[(char offset, line without its terminator)] over `text`."""
+    out = []
+    off = 0
+    for raw in text.splitlines(keepends=True):
+        out.append((off, raw.rstrip("\r\n")))
+        off += len(raw)
+    return out
+
+
+def build_inert_mask(text, offsets):
+    """Per-character flags: 1 where a reference would never be resolved."""
+    mask = bytearray(len(text))
+    fence = None  # (fence char, opening run length)
+    for start, line in offsets:
+        m = FENCE_RE.match(line)
+        if fence is None:
+            if m:
+                fence = (m.group(2)[0], len(m.group(2)))
+                for i in range(start, start + len(line)):
+                    mask[i] = 1
+            continue
+        for i in range(start, start + len(line)):
+            mask[i] = 1
+        if (m and m.group(2)[0] == fence[0]
+                and len(m.group(2)) >= fence[1]
+                and not m.group(3).strip()):
+            fence = None
+    for m in COMMENT_RE.finditer(text):
+        if m.start() < len(mask) and mask[m.start()]:
+            continue  # a literal "<!--" printed inside a fence opens nothing
+        for i in range(m.start(), min(m.end(), len(mask))):
+            mask[i] = 1
+    return mask
+
+
+# --- Reference shapes --------------------------------------------------------
+#
+# `\S*AGENTS\.md` had no path-separator boundary, so `@NOTAGENTS.md` and
+# `@zzzAGENTS.md` counted as imports of AGENTS.md. The matched path must end in
+# AGENTS.md as a whole segment.
+IMPORT_RE = re.compile(r'^ {0,3}@(?P<path>\S+?)\s*$')
+# A mention in prose: an optional relative path, then AGENTS.md, with no
+# identifier character glued to the front (so NOTAGENTS.md does not match) and
+# nothing glued to the back.
+MENTION_RE = re.compile(r'(?<![0-9A-Za-z_.\-/])((?:[\w.\-~]+/)*AGENTS\.md)(?![0-9A-Za-z])')
+
+# A pointer has to read as a pointer. `"AGENTS.md" in ln` passed
+# "Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete." and "We deleted AGENTS.md last
+# year." — both of which point the reader away from the file. Require a
+# deference cue in the naming sentence, and reject a negated one.
+DIRECTIVE_RE = re.compile(
+    r'\b(see|read|refer|refers|referring|consult|consults|follow|follows|'
+    r'defer|defers|deferring|described|documented|documents|covered|covers|'
+    r'found|listed|specified|defined|governed|per|use|uses|using|apply|obey|'
+    r'start|check|live|lives|contains|holds|carries|inherit|inherits|import|'
+    r'imports|conventions|instructions|guidelines|guidance|rules|standards|'
+    r'reference|setup)\b', re.I)
+NEGATION_RE = re.compile(
+    r"(\bnot\b|n't\b|\bnever\b|\bno longer\b|\bdeleted\b|\bremoved\b|"
+    r"\bobsolete\b|\bdeprecated\b|\bignore\b|\bignores\b|\bignoring\b|"
+    r"\bdisregard\b|\bsuperseded\b|\bgone\b|\bunused\b|\bstale\b)", re.I)
+SENTENCE_SPLIT_RE = re.compile(r'(?<=[.;:!?])\s+')
+
+
+def sentence_around(line, index):
+    """(sentence of `line` containing character `index`, its start offset)."""
+    bounds = [0]
+    for m in SENTENCE_SPLIT_RE.finditer(line):
+        bounds.append(m.end())
+    bounds.append(len(line) + 1)
+    for i in range(len(bounds) - 1):
+        if bounds[i] <= index < bounds[i + 1]:
+            return line[bounds[i]:bounds[i + 1]], bounds[i]
+    return line, 0
+
+
+def reads_as_pointer(line, match):
+    """Does the sentence naming AGENTS.md actually point the reader at it?
+
+    The matched path is blanked out before the cues are applied. It is a
+    filename, not prose, and leaving it in let its own characters vote: the
+    perfectly ordinary `docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md` tripped the negation
+    cue on the `not` path segment, so a pointer got rejected for the wrong
+    reason and the near-miss line then reported the wrong diagnosis.
+    """
+    sentence, sentence_start = sentence_around(line, match.start())
+    rel_start = match.start() - sentence_start
+    rel_end = match.end() - sentence_start
+    probe = sentence[:rel_start] + " AGENTS.md " + sentence[rel_end:]
+    if NEGATION_RE.search(probe):
+        return False
+    return bool(DIRECTIVE_RE.search(probe))
+
+
+def resolve(raw_path):
+    """An import/pointer path resolved the way the provider would resolve it."""
+    p = os.path.expanduser(raw_path)
+    if not os.path.isabs(p):
+        p = os.path.join(adapter_dir, p)
+    return os.path.normpath(p)
+
+
+def target_problem(raw_path):
+    """None if `raw_path` names a real, non-empty file; else why not."""
+    resolved = resolve(raw_path)
+    if not os.path.isfile(resolved):
+        return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which does not exist"
+    try:
+        if os.path.getsize(resolved) == 0:
+            return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which is empty"
+        with open(resolved, "rb") as fh:
+            if not fh.read().strip():
+                return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which is blank"
+    except OSError as exc:
+        return f"'{raw_path}' resolves to {resolved}, which cannot be read ({exc.strerror})"
+    return None
+
+
+def names_agents_md(path):
+    return path == "AGENTS.md" or path.endswith("/AGENTS.md")
+
+
+offsets = line_offsets(adapter_content)
+lines = [line for _, line in offsets]
+mask = build_inert_mask(adapter_content, offsets)
+
+
+def is_inert(abs_index):
+    return abs_index < len(mask) and bool(mask[abs_index])
+
+
+# Lines shaped like an @AGENTS.md import, whether or not the target resolves.
+# Used to exclude them from the duplication denominator and from the prose
+# pointer scan, both of which only care about the shape.
+import_shaped_lines = set()
+# (line, raw path) for every import whose target actually resolves.
+live_imports = []
+# Diagnostics for imports that are the right shape but resolve to nothing.
+dead_imports = []
+# Imports that exist only inside a fence or an HTML comment.
+inert_imports = []
+
+for start, line in offsets:
+    m = IMPORT_RE.match(line)
+    if not m or not names_agents_md(m.group("path")):
+        continue
+    at_index = start + line.index("@")
+    if is_inert(at_index):
+        inert_imports.append(line.strip())
+        continue
+    import_shaped_lines.add(line)
+    problem = target_problem(m.group("path"))
+    if problem:
+        dead_imports.append(problem)
+    else:
+        live_imports.append(line)
+
+live_pointers = []
+dead_pointers = []
+inert_pointers = []
+mention_only = []
+
+for start, line in offsets:
+    if line in import_shaped_lines:
+        continue
+    for m in MENTION_RE.finditer(line):
+        if is_inert(start + m.start()):
+            inert_pointers.append(line.strip())
+            continue
+        if not reads_as_pointer(line, m):
+            mention_only.append(sentence_around(line, m.start())[0].strip())
+            continue
+        problem = target_problem(m.group(1))
+        if problem:
+            dead_pointers.append(problem)
+        else:
+            live_pointers.append(line)
 
 if no_import_syntax:
-    has_reference = "AGENTS.md" in adapter_content
+    has_reference = bool(live_pointers)
+    near_misses = dead_pointers + [f"{d} (inside a code fence or HTML comment)" for d in inert_pointers]
+    near_misses += [f"'{s}' names AGENTS.md but does not point at it" for s in mention_only]
 else:
-    has_reference = bool(import_lines) or "AGENTS.md" in adapter_content
+    has_reference = bool(live_imports)
+    near_misses = dead_imports + [f"'{d}' is inside a code fence or HTML comment, where no import is resolved" for d in inert_imports]
 
 if not has_reference:
     has_fail = True
     print(f"FAIL  Adapter has no reference to AGENTS.md — {adapter_path}")
     if no_import_syntax:
-        print("      Why: This provider has no import syntax, so the adapter must at least mention AGENTS.md as a text pointer.")
+        print("      Why: This provider resolves no cross-file import, so the adapter must point at AGENTS.md in prose; an `@AGENTS.md` line here is inert text. The pointer has to read as a pointer and name a file that is really there — a bare or negated mention (\"we deleted AGENTS.md\") defers nothing, and neither does a mention buried in a code fence or an HTML comment.")
-        print("      Fix: Add a sentence like \"See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.\"")
+        print("      Fix: Add a sentence like \"See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.\", outside any fence, naming a path that exists relative to this file.")
     else:
-        print("      Why: A thin adapter must import AGENTS.md (e.g. `@AGENTS.md`) rather than silently omitting it.")
+        print("      Why: A thin adapter must import AGENTS.md with an `@AGENTS.md` line of its own, indented no more than three spaces, and the path must resolve to a real non-empty file. Naming the file mid-sentence or inside backticks is prose this check will not credit; putting the line inside a ``` fence, an indented code block, or an HTML comment is worse, because nothing resolves it and it looks right.")
-        print("      Fix: Add an `@AGENTS.md` (or equivalent relative path) import line.")
+        print("      Fix: Put `@AGENTS.md` (or the equivalent relative path) alone on its own line at the top level of the file, or pass --no-import-syntax if this provider resolves no imports.")
+    for miss in near_misses:
+        print(f"      Near miss: {miss}")
     print()
 
 # --- Duplication check ---
-non_import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if not IMPORT_RE.match(ln)]
+non_import_lines = [ln for ln in lines if ln not in import_shaped_lines]
 adapter_lines = [ln.strip() for ln in non_import_lines if ln.strip()]
 agents_lines = {ln.strip() for ln in agents_md_content.splitlines() if ln.strip()}
 
@@ -132,10 +487,10 @@ if non_blank_count > max_lines:
     has_fail = True
     print(f"FAIL  Adapter is not thin — {adapter_path}")
     print(f"      Why: {non_blank_count} non-blank lines exceeds the {max_lines}-line threshold for a thin adapter.")
-    print("      Fix: Move provider-agnostic content into AGENTS.md; keep only genuinely provider-specific additions here.")
+    print("      Fix: Delete the lines already covered by AGENTS.md; keep only genuinely provider-specific additions here.")
     print()
 
 if has_fail:
-    sys.exit(1)
+    sys.exit(EXIT_FAIL)
 sys.exit(0)
 PYTHON

plugins/core/.apm/skills/provider-adapter-author/tests/validate-adapter.bats

@@ -115,6 +115,51 @@ EOF
     assert_output --partial "no reference"
 }
 
+@test "the two --no-import-syntax branches disagree: a text-pointer-only adapter fails in default mode" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+See AGENTS.md at the repo root for setup, style, and testing conventions.
+
+## Copilot-specific
+Prefer inline suggestions over chat for one-line edits.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, an inert @AGENTS.md line alone is not a prose pointer" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+@AGENTS.md
+
+## Copilot-specific
+Prefer inline suggestions over chat for one-line edits.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "--max-lines as the final argument reports a real error instead of failing silently" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD" --max-lines
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "--max-lines requires a value"
+}
+
+@test "--max-lines rejects a non-numeric value with a real error" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --max-lines abc "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "non-negative integer"
+}
+
 @test "--help exits 0 and documents usage" {
     run bash "$SCRIPT" --help
     assert_success
@@ -123,6 +168,352 @@ EOF
 
 @test "fails with a clear error when the adapter file argument is missing" {
     run bash "$SCRIPT"
-    assert_failure
+    assert_failure 2
     assert_output --partial "required"
 }
+
+@test "a UTF-8 BOM before the @import line does not hide it" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'w', encoding='utf-8-sig').write('@AGENTS.md\n')" "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+@test "a usage error exits 2, a genuine finding exits 1" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --max-lines -3 "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 2
+    refute_output --partial "FAIL"
+
+    : > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "FAIL"
+}
+
+@test "a non-UTF-8 adapter is reported as an encoding error, not as a missing reference" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write('@AGENTS.md\n'.encode('utf-16'))" "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "not valid UTF-8"
+    refute_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "an @AGENTS.md folded into a sentence fails, and the message says the import needs its own line" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+See @AGENTS.md for shared conventions.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+    assert_output --partial "line of its own"
+}
+
+# --- Q1: a reference only counts where something would resolve it -------------
+
+@test "an @AGENTS.md inside a backtick code fence is not credited as an import" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+# Claude notes
+
+Put this at the top of the file:
+
+```
+@AGENTS.md
+```
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "an @AGENTS.md inside a tilde code fence is not credited as an import" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+~~~
+@AGENTS.md
+~~~
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "an @AGENTS.md in a four-space indented code block is not credited as an import" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+# Claude notes
+
+    @AGENTS.md
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "an @AGENTS.md inside a multi-line HTML comment is not credited as an import" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+# Claude notes
+
+<!--
+@AGENTS.md
+-->
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "an @AGENTS.md indented up to three spaces is still credited" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    printf '   @AGENTS.md\n' > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+# --- Q2: encodings that decode as valid UTF-8 but are not UTF-8 ---------------
+
+@test "a BOM-less UTF-16LE adapter is an encoding error, not a missing reference" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write('@AGENTS.md\n'.encode('utf-16-le'))" "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "not valid UTF-8"
+    refute_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "a BOM-less UTF-32LE adapter is an encoding error, not a missing reference" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write('@AGENTS.md\n'.encode('utf-32-le'))" "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "not valid UTF-8"
+    refute_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "a doubled UTF-8 BOM does not hide the @import line" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write(('@AGENTS.md\n').encode('utf-8'))" "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+@test "a BOM in front of a mid-file @import line does not hide it" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    python3 -c "import sys; open(sys.argv[1], 'wb').write(('# Claude notes\n\n@AGENTS.md\n').encode('utf-8'))" "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+# --- Q3: a file that exists but cannot be read is not a FAIL -----------------
+
+@test "an adapter that exists but cannot be read exits 3 with a diagnostic and no FAIL" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    chmod 000 "$ADAPTER"
+    # chmod is not enough under a uid that bypasses it (root in CI containers).
+    # /proc/self/mem is a regular file whose read returns EIO for every uid, so
+    # it exercises the same branch where chmod cannot.
+    if cat "$ADAPTER" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        if [ -e /proc/self/mem ]; then
+            ADAPTER=/proc/self/mem
+        else
+            chmod 644 "$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+            skip "no way to make a readable-by-stat, unreadable-by-open file here"
+        fi
+    fi
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    chmod 644 "$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    assert_failure 3
+    assert_output --partial "could not be read"
+    refute_output --partial "FAIL"
+}
+
+# --- Q4: the reference has to name, and resolve to, a real AGENTS.md ---------
+
+@test "an @import naming a path that does not exist is not credited" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+    assert_output --partial "does not exist"
+}
+
+@test "@NOTAGENTS.md and @zzzAGENTS.md are not imports of AGENTS.md" {
+    # The decoys are real files, so the on-disk resolution check cannot be what
+    # rejects them. Only the path-segment boundary can — without the fixtures
+    # this test passes against a substring match and proves nothing.
+    cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/NOTAGENTS.md"
+    cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/zzzAGENTS.md"
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@NOTAGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+
+    echo "@zzzAGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "an @import resolving to a zero-byte AGENTS.md is not credited" {
+    SUB="$TMPDIR/empty"
+    mkdir -p "$SUB"
+    : > "$SUB/AGENTS.md"
+    ADAPTER="$SUB/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+    assert_output --partial "empty"
+}
+
+@test "an @import naming a real relative path to AGENTS.md is credited" {
+    mkdir -p "$TMPDIR/docs"
+    cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/docs/AGENTS.md"
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@docs/AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+# --- Q5: --no-import-syntax needs a pointer, not a mention -------------------
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a negated mention of AGENTS.md is not a pointer" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+Do NOT read AGENTS.md; it is obsolete.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a past-tense mention of a deleted AGENTS.md is not a pointer" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+We deleted AGENTS.md last year.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a pointer inside a code fence is not credited" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+Example of what to write:
+
+```
+See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.
+```
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a pointer inside an HTML comment is not credited" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+# Copilot instructions
+
+<!-- See AGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions. -->
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a name merely ending in AGENTS.md is not a pointer to it" {
+    # Real decoy files, so the on-disk resolution check cannot be what rejects
+    # these — only the token boundary in the mention pattern can. zzzAGENTS.md
+    # is the load-bearing case: dropping the boundary from NOTAGENTS.md leaves
+    # the fragment "NOT" behind, which the negation cue then rejects for an
+    # unrelated reason, so that case alone would prove nothing.
+    cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/zzzAGENTS.md"
+    cp "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/NOTAGENTS.md"
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+See zzzAGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+See NOTAGENTS.md at the repo root for shared conventions.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a pointer naming a path that does not exist is not credited" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+See docs/does/not/exist/AGENTS.md for shared conventions.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+    assert_output --partial "does not exist"
+}
+
+# --- argument handling -------------------------------------------------------
+
+@test "a third positional argument is rejected instead of silently ignored" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD" "$TMPDIR/also-not-graded.md"
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "exactly 2 positional arguments"
+    # The usage text this prints mentions the word FAIL, so refute the shape of
+    # a real finding line rather than the bare word.
+    refute_output --partial "FAIL  Adapter"
+}
+
+@test "an unknown option is reported as an unknown option, not as a missing file" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    echo "@AGENTS.md" > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --bogus "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 2
+    assert_output --partial "unknown option '--bogus'"
+    refute_output --partial "'--bogus' is not a file"
+    refute_output --partial "FAIL  Adapter"
+}
+
+@test "--max-lines=N is accepted in the equals form" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/CLAUDE.md"
+    {
+        echo "@AGENTS.md"
+        for i in $(seq 1 10); do echo "Provider-specific line $i unrelated to AGENTS.md content."; done
+    } > "$ADAPTER"
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --max-lines=5 "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "thin"
+
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --max-lines=40 "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_success
+}
+
+@test "with --no-import-syntax, a bare mention with no deference cue is not a pointer" {
+    ADAPTER="$TMPDIR/copilot-instructions.md"
+    cat > "$ADAPTER" <<'EOF'
+# Copilot instructions
+
+This repo also has an AGENTS.md.
+
+Prefer inline suggestions over chat for one-line edits.
+EOF
+    run bash "$SCRIPT" --no-import-syntax "$ADAPTER" "$AGENTS_MD"
+    assert_failure 1
+    assert_output --partial "no reference"
+}

plugins/core/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "core",
-  "version": "1.1.1",
+  "version": "1.1.2",
   "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Defame1297",

plugins/core/.github/plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "core",
-  "version": "1.1.1",
+  "version": "1.1.2",
   "description": "Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.",
   "author": {
     "name": "Defame1297",

plugins/core/apm.yml

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 name: core
-version: 1.1.1
+version: 1.1.2
 description: Skills for authoring and auditing a repo's AGENTS.md and the provider adapter files that defer to it.
 author:
   name: Defame1297

plugins/core/skills/agentsmd-audit/README.md

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-# agentsmd-audit
-
-Audit a target repo's AGENTS.md file(s) for embedded secrets, structural completeness, and drift.
-
-## What it does
-
-Runs a single combined pass across every AGENTS.md file in a repo (root and any nested monorepo files): flags embedded secrets/credentials, checks structure against the agents.md common-sections checklist, and resolves referenced commands/paths against the actual repo to catch stale documentation. Outputs a compact findings report — findings only, grouped by dimension, each with Why and Fix. Never inspects provider-specific adapter files (CLAUDE.md, etc.) and never writes or fixes anything.
-
-## Usage
-
-```
-/agentsmd-audit
-```
-
-Provide the path to the repo root to audit when invoking.
-
-## Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| `SKILL.md` | Skill instructions for agents |
-| `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` | Scans AGENTS.md files for embedded secrets, API keys, tokens, connection strings |
-| `scripts/validate-structure.sh` | Checks for empty/placeholder content, common-sections checklist, nested-vs-root duplication |
-| `scripts/validate-drift.sh` | Resolves referenced npm/make commands and file paths against the repo |
-| `references/sources.md` | Provenance record — sources that informed this skill and which files each contributed to |
-| `scripts/README.md` | Directory documentation for `scripts/` |
-| `tests/README.md` | (source-only) Bats test dependency and run instructions |
-| `tests/validate-secrets.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-secrets.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-structure.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-structure.sh` |
-| `tests/validate-drift.bats` | (source-only) Bats test suite for `scripts/validate-drift.sh` |
-
-Rows marked **(source-only)** exist in the authoring source (`.apm/skills/agentsmd-audit/`) but are
-not present in an installed plugin: `scripts/sync-plugin-content.sh` strips `<category>/<name>/tests`
-when it generates the flat mirror, because these are dev-time fixtures no plugin host needs to
-discover (ADR-0017). Run them from a repo checkout, not from an install.