Defame1297
5e232503c4
Why: ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills. Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88 (apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing). Implementation notes: - All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field, no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory, permissionMode). - Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package, matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice. - .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs. url, Unicode escaping). - plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0 for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped 0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated script (apm has no native version-bump automation). - Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml, scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh, scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures -- including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path isolation regression introduced mid-fix. - Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments. - Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive. Impact: plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on -- editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats, 13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean. Fixes: #90 Refs: #88, #89 ADR: 0015 ADR: 0016 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC
53 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: gitea-releases
|
|
|
|
description: >
|
|
Use when managing Gitea releases and tags for a repository: listing, creating, or deleting
|
|
releases (with draft/prerelease flags and release notes), and listing, creating, or deleting the
|
|
underlying git tags. Use even if the user doesn't say "release" explicitly — "cut a v1.2.0",
|
|
"publish a prerelease", "tag this commit", or "what's the latest release" all apply. Do not use
|
|
for git branch or commit history operations (use gitea-branches) or for issue/PR management (use
|
|
gitea-issues / gitea-prs).
|
|
|
|
metadata:
|
|
category: gitea
|
|
source_keys:
|
|
- gitea-mcp-repo
|
|
- gitea-mcp-slim-go
|
|
- context7-websites-gitea
|
|
- context7-gitea-tea-cli
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Gotchas
|
|
|
|
- **`delete_release` takes a numeric `id`, never a tag name.** `delete_tag` is the mirror opposite — it takes the `tag_name` string, never a numeric id. These two tools are asymmetric on purpose; passing a tag name to `delete_release` or a numeric id to `delete_tag` fails. Always resolve the numeric release id via `list_releases` or `get_release` first if you only have a tag name in hand.
|
|
- **Deleting a release does not delete its tag.** They are separate destructive operations against separate resources — a release is a wrapper (title, notes, draft/prerelease flags, assets) around a tag, not the tag itself. If the intent is to remove both, call `delete_release` and `delete_tag` separately.
|
|
- **`list_releases`/`list_tags` default to `per_page: 20`**, unlike most other gitea-mcp tools which default to 30. The MCP layer does no auto-pagination — to get a complete result set, loop `page` upward until a page returns fewer than `per_page` results.
|
|
- **`is_draft`/`is_pre_release` are explicit booleans the caller sets on `create_release` — never inferred from `tag_name`.** Note the input param is `is_draft`, which maps to the `draft` field on the *response* object (see Dispatch table below and `references/call-signatures.md`) — `draft` is never a valid input key. Practitioner convention (per the `tea` CLI) uses `-beta`/`-rc` suffixes for prereleases (e.g. `v2.0.0-beta.1`), but Gitea does not enforce or infer this from the tag string. If the user names a tag that looks like a prerelease, set `is_pre_release: true` explicitly rather than assuming the flag is redundant with the name.
|
|
- **Tag names are conventionally semver, `v`-prefixed** (`v1.2.0`, `v2.0.0-beta.1`), but this is a practitioner convention, not a Gitea constraint — don't reject or rewrite a caller-supplied tag name that doesn't follow it.
|
|
|
|
## Dispatch table
|
|
|
|
| Action | Tool | Required params | Optional params |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| List releases | `list_releases` | `owner`, `repo` | `is_draft`, `is_pre_release`, `page` (default 1), `per_page` (default 20) |
|
|
| Get one release | `get_release` | `owner`, `repo`, `id` (number) | — |
|
|
| Get latest release | `get_latest_release` | `owner`, `repo` | — |
|
|
| Create release | `create_release` | `owner`, `repo`, `tag_name`, `target`, `title` | `body`, `is_draft`, `is_pre_release` |
|
|
| Delete release | `delete_release` | `owner`, `repo`, `id` (number) | — |
|
|
| List tags | `list_tags` | `owner`, `repo` | `page` (default 1), `per_page` (default 20) |
|
|
| Get one tag | `get_tag` | `owner`, `repo`, `tag_name` | — |
|
|
| Create tag | `create_tag` | `owner`, `repo`, `tag_name` | `target`, `message` |
|
|
| Delete tag | `delete_tag` | `owner`, `repo`, `tag_name` | — |
|
|
|
|
`target` (on `create_release`/`create_tag`) is a commitish — a branch name, existing tag, or commit SHA — the point the new tag is cut from. See `references/call-signatures.md` for response shapes.
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Creating a release:** Call `create_release` directly with `tag_name` + `target` + `title` — Gitea is assumed to create the underlying tag automatically if `tag_name` doesn't already exist (this is plausible behavior inferred from the API shape, not directly confirmed in the research docs), so a separate `create_tag` call is only needed when you want to tag a commit without wrapping it in a release yet. Verify the tag exists afterward if this matters to the caller. Set `is_pre_release`/`is_draft` explicitly per the Gotchas above; don't leave them to default inference.
|
|
- [ ] **Deleting a release safely:** Resolve the numeric id first — call `list_releases` (paginate if needed, see Gotchas) or `get_release` if the id is already known, find the entry matching the target `tag_name`, then call `delete_release` with that `id`. Never pass `tag_name` to `delete_release`.
|
|
- [ ] **Deleting a tag along with its release:** Delete the release first (frees the id lookup), then call `delete_tag` with the `tag_name` separately — confirm both are intended before proceeding, since each is an independent irreversible operation.
|
|
- [ ] **Listing every page:** If the caller needs all releases or tags (not just the first page), loop `page: 1, 2, 3...` until a response has fewer than `per_page` entries.
|
|
|
|
If exact response field shapes or additional conventions are needed, read `references/call-signatures.md` and `references/conventions.md`.
|