Files

Defame1297 5e232503c4 feat(kyberforge): execute plugin-to-apm marketplace conversion

Why:
ADR-0015 established that Microsoft APM (apm.yml + .apm/) should replace
this repo's hand-authored plugin.json/marketplace.json model, with those
files becoming compiled output of `apm pack` instead of files edited by
hand via the (now-retired) plugin-author/marketplace-author skills.
Issue #90 was the deferred execution of that decision, gated on #88
(apm tooling) and #89 (apm-native agent-author/skill-author routing).

Implementation notes:
- All six plugins (bin, core, git, gitea, kyberforge, lint) now carry
  apm.yml + .apm/{skills,agents,hooks} as their authoring source. Skills
  moved with a plain git mv (content-identical across targets). Agents
  were re-authored, not moved: per ADR-0016, .apm/agents/*.agent.md
  compiles verbatim to both Claude and Copilot, so plugin-scope agents
  now carry only name/description/model/source_keys -- no tools: field,
  no Claude-only knobs (isolation, maxTurns, effort, memory,
  permissionMode).
- Root apm.yml registers all 7 marketplace packages (6 local plus
  mattpocock-skills as a remote entry) under versioning: per_package,
  matching this repo's existing independent-plugin-versioning practice.
- .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and every plugin's plugin.json are now
  apm-pack-compiled output, verified against the prior hand-maintained
  content: same names/descriptions/versions/licenses/authors, only
  cosmetic serialization differences (JSON key order, owner email vs.
  url, Unicode escaping).
- plugin-author and marketplace-author are retired now that apm-based
  authoring fully replaces their job; kyberforge bumped 1.3.1 -> 1.4.0
  for that removal, and the root marketplace catalog bumped
  0.3.1 -> 0.3.2 to match, per the version-bump convention now
  documented in apm-workflow's reference docs instead of a dedicated
  script (apm has no native version-bump automation).
- Fixed hardcoded pre-.apm/ path assumptions across
  .pre-commit-config.yaml, .pre-commit-hooks.yaml,
  scripts/check-scope-walkup-sync.sh, scripts/sync-vale-styles.sh,
  scripts/check-vale-style-sync.sh, six plugins' root plugin.json
  (stale skills/hooks/agents pointer fields that check-manifests.sh
  validates), and several tests/*.bats and tests/*.sh fixtures --
  including a bats REPO_ROOT relative-path depth bug (10 files, one
  extra .apm/ directory level to walk up) and a vale probe-path
  isolation regression introduced mid-fix.
- Corrected empirically-wrong assumptions surfaced this session in
  apm-workflow/apm-install's own reference docs: `apm marketplace
  package add` does not accept local paths (only owner/repo remote
  shorthand -- local packages are registered by editing apm.yml's
  marketplace.packages[] directly); `apm compile` is a consumer-side
  AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md generator, not the plugin.json producer, and
  hard-fails on skill/agent-only packages without --clean; `apm plugin
  init <name>` nests a stray subdirectory when run with a positional
  name arg from inside a same-named directory; no native Copilot
  marketplace output profile exists; .mcp.json is merged into the
  compiled plugin.json content-aware and target-scoped, with no
  dependencies.mcp entry needed for simple passthrough; pipx is the
  correct pip fallback on externally-managed Python environments.
- Renamed agent-author's copilot.agent.md template asset to
  copilot.agent.md.template so apm compile's recursive *.agent.md glob
  stops misparsing the placeholder template as a real agent primitive.

Impact:
plugin.json and marketplace.json are compiled artifacts from here on --
editing them by hand is no longer the workflow; edit apm.yml/.apm/ and
run apm pack. CONTEXT.md's Plugin/Plugin marketplace glossary entries
reflect this. ADR-0001 is marked superseded, ADR-0006 moot, and
ADR-0010 updated for the new .apm/agents/ path (project/user scope
unaffected, per ADR-0016). Full local verification: claude plugin
validate --strict on all 6 plugins, apm audit --ci, apm marketplace
check, check-manifests.sh, and the full test suite (165/165 bats,
13/13 shell scripts) all pass clean.

Fixes: #90
Refs: #88, #89
ADR: 0015
ADR: 0016

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ub96PyaSRD9BHPktotj1pC

2026-08-12 18:21:24 +00:00

2.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

topic, source_keys

topic

source_keys

conventions

context7-websites-gitea

context7-gitea-tea-cli

Release and tag conventions

Practitioner conventions that inform how to use the mechanics in call-signatures.md — not additional tool schemas.

Release wraps a tag, not the reverse

A release is a title, body (notes), and draft/prerelease flags layered on top of an existing or newly-created tag. The tag is the git-level object (a name pointing at a commit); the release is a Gitea-level metadata wrapper around it. This is why delete_release and delete_tag are separate calls with separate identifiers (numeric id vs. tag name) — removing the wrapper never implies removing the underlying pointer, and vice versa.

Semver tag naming

Per the tea CLI (the reference Gitea client), tag names conventionally follow semver with a v prefix: v1.2.0, v2.0.0-beta.1. This is a convention observed by tooling and humans, not a Gitea-enforced constraint — the API accepts any string as tag_name. Don't validate or rewrite a caller-supplied tag name against semver; just pass it through.

Draft and prerelease are explicit flags

is_draft and is_pre_release are booleans the caller sets directly on create_release — Gitea does not infer either from the tag name, even though the -beta/-rc suffix convention above is commonly used to signal a prerelease to humans. When a user asks to "cut a beta" or "publish a release candidate," set is_pre_release: true explicitly in the same call rather than relying on the tag string to carry that meaning.

Note the input/output naming mismatch: the input param is is_draft, but the release object returned by the API uses draft (and prerelease) as the field names. draft is never a valid input key — passing draft: true to create_release is silently ignored rather than erroring.

Release notes sourcing

Practitioner convention (per tea) is to source release notes (body) from a changelog file rather than typing them inline for each release — useful context when a caller asks to "generate" or "use the changelog for" release notes rather than write them from scratch.

2.1 KiB Raw Blame History