Closes #5. Single authoring skill replaces the factory trio — one set of standards, one script, one place for future governance rules. Routes to create or improve flow based on context. Passes skill-audit with no findings. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016z2ZFYHQCex8yZAMVMTZzZ
237 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
237 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: skill-author
|
|
description: >
|
|
Use when the user wants to create a new skill from scratch ("write a skill
|
|
for X", "build a skill that does Y", "create a SKILL.md for Z"), or improve
|
|
an existing one ("improve this skill", "fix based on feedback", "apply these
|
|
audit findings", "update based on grill output"). Also use when the user
|
|
provides inline feedback about a skill's behavior and wants it applied, or
|
|
when a grill session, eval run, or audit has produced findings the user wants
|
|
acted on — even if they don't say "improve" explicitly. Authors and refines
|
|
skills following the agentskills.io specification. Performs best when preceded
|
|
by a grill session and domain research. Do not use for read-only review — use
|
|
/skill-audit instead. Do not use to author agent definition files.
|
|
allowed-tools: Bash Read Write Edit
|
|
metadata:
|
|
category: factory
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Gotchas
|
|
|
|
- Patching per symptom is the default failure mode. Three eval failures may all trace to one missing instruction — always identify the root cause before editing.
|
|
- Do not create new scripts unless a signal explicitly calls for it. Writing scripts from scratch requires transcript analysis that is out of scope here; flag the opportunity as a suggestion instead.
|
|
|
|
## Route
|
|
|
|
Determine which flow to follow before touching the filesystem:
|
|
|
|
- **No skill directory at the target path** → follow **Creating a new skill**
|
|
- **Directory exists + at least one improvement signal present** → follow **Improving an existing skill**
|
|
- **Directory exists + no signals present** → ask: "No improvement signals found. Did you mean to create a new skill, or do you have feedback to apply?"
|
|
|
|
Signals include: grill session output, `/skill-audit` findings (PASS/FAIL punch list), inline user feedback, session context describing what went wrong.
|
|
|
|
## Creating a new skill
|
|
|
|
### Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
Run `/grill-me` on the skill's design and research the target domain first.
|
|
Share those outputs in this conversation: grill context, research docs, examples, constraints.
|
|
|
|
**Before touching the filesystem, verify you have:**
|
|
- [ ] A clear purpose — what specific task will this skill handle?
|
|
- [ ] Trigger scenarios — when should an agent activate it, including indirect cases?
|
|
- [ ] Skill name (kebab-case) and destination path
|
|
|
|
If any are missing, stop and ask the user before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
**Requires `/skill-audit`** — used in Step 5 for final validation. Both skills ship in the kyberforge plugin and are co-installed. If `/skill-audit` is unavailable, stop and ask the user to install the kyberforge plugin before continuing.
|
|
|
|
### Step 1 — Scaffold
|
|
|
|
Run the copy script with the skill name and destination directory:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
bash scripts/new-skill.sh <skill-name> <destination-dir>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
```bash
|
|
bash scripts/new-skill.sh my-tool ~/.agents/skills/
|
|
bash scripts/new-skill.sh data-analyzer plugins/myplugin/skills/
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This creates `<destination-dir>/<skill-name>/` with annotated templates ready to fill in.
|
|
|
|
If the destination is inside a plugin directory (path contains a `plugin.json`), read `references/deployment-modes.md` before adding any file references to SKILL.md.
|
|
|
|
### Step 2 — Fill in SKILL.md
|
|
|
|
Open `<destination-dir>/<skill-name>/SKILL.md`. Replace every `FILL IN:` placeholder.
|
|
|
|
#### Frontmatter
|
|
|
|
**`name`** — already set by the scaffold script. Must exactly match the directory name.
|
|
|
|
**`description`** — carries the entire triggering burden. Rules:
|
|
- Imperative: "Use when..." not "This skill..."
|
|
- Focus on user intent, not implementation — describe what the user is trying to achieve, not the skill's internal mechanics
|
|
- Specific about capabilities ("parses and validates OpenAPI specs", not "helps with APIs")
|
|
- Include indirect triggers: "even if the user doesn't mention X explicitly"
|
|
- Add "Do not use when..." only if a near-miss skill exists that could steal activations
|
|
- Hard limit: 1024 characters — count before finalizing
|
|
|
|
**Optional fields** — uncomment and fill in or remove entirely:
|
|
- `license` — include when distributing the skill externally
|
|
- `compatibility` — include if the skill requires specific tools, runtimes, or network access
|
|
- `metadata` — key-value map; use `author`, `version`, `category`
|
|
- `allowed-tools` — space-separated pre-approved tools; reduces permission prompts
|
|
|
|
#### Body — include only what the agent lacks
|
|
|
|
Rename the placeholder section heading to one that fits the skill's structure — `## Step 1`, `## Workflow`, `## Instructions`, etc.
|
|
|
|
Ask of every sentence: "Would the agent get this wrong without it?" Cut anything that answers "no."
|
|
|
|
**Include:**
|
|
- Non-obvious sequences or ordering constraints — the agent may skip or reorder steps without this
|
|
- Domain conventions the agent cannot infer from general knowledge — this is the core value a skill adds
|
|
- One default per decision point, plus one escape hatch — never a menu; menus cause the agent to pause or pick arbitrarily
|
|
- Gotchas — facts that defy reasonable assumptions; the agent will get these wrong every time without them
|
|
|
|
**Exclude:**
|
|
- Concepts the agent already knows (what JSON is, how HTTP works) — adds tokens without changing behavior
|
|
- Exhaustive option lists — pick a default; the agent doesn't benefit from choosing
|
|
- Steps the agent handles independently — over-specifying leads agents to follow unproductive paths
|
|
- Restatements of the description — it's already in context; repeating it wastes the token budget
|
|
|
|
#### Patterns
|
|
|
|
**Gotchas** — highest value; place near the top:
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Gotchas
|
|
- <Fact that defies a reasonable assumption>
|
|
- <Non-obvious naming discrepancy or hidden constraint>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Default with escape hatch** (not a menu):
|
|
```markdown
|
|
Use <X> for <task>. For <edge case>, use <Y> instead.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Prescriptive sequence** (when order is critical or fragile):
|
|
```markdown
|
|
Run exactly:
|
|
\`\`\`bash
|
|
<command>
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
Do not modify flags.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Checklist** (multi-step workflows):
|
|
```markdown
|
|
- [ ] Step 1: ...
|
|
- [ ] Step 2: ...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Conditional reference** (progressive disclosure — load only when needed):
|
|
```markdown
|
|
If <condition>, read `references/<file>.md`.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### Size budget
|
|
|
|
Keep `SKILL.md` under 500 lines and 5,000 tokens. When approaching the limit:
|
|
- Move reference material to `references/<topic>.md` and load it conditionally
|
|
- Bundle repeated executable logic into `scripts/` rather than reinventing each run
|
|
|
|
### Step 3 — Add scripts (if needed)
|
|
|
|
Place executable scripts in `scripts/`. Rules for agentic scripts:
|
|
|
|
- **Self-contained** — bundle dependencies inline so the agent can run the script with a single command; do not require a separate install step
|
|
- **No interactive prompts** — agents run non-interactive; blocking on TTY input hangs indefinitely. Accept all input via flags, env vars, or stdin.
|
|
- **Expose `--help`** — concise usage output; keep it short (it enters the agent's context)
|
|
- **Structured output** — data (JSON, CSV) to stdout; diagnostics and progress to stderr
|
|
- **Idempotent** — "create if not exists"; agents may retry on failure
|
|
- **Meaningful exit codes** — `0` success, non-zero failure; document in `--help`
|
|
- **Dry-run support** — add `--dry-run` for destructive operations
|
|
|
|
If the skill needs scripts with external package dependencies or language-specific tooling (Python, TypeScript, Ruby, Go), read `references/scripts.md` for package runner patterns and inline dependency formats.
|
|
|
|
If no scripts are needed, delete `scripts/README.md` and the `scripts/` directory.
|
|
|
|
### Step 4 — Add references, assets, and tests (if needed)
|
|
|
|
**`references/`** — additional documentation loaded on demand. One topic per file.
|
|
Reference conditionally from SKILL.md: `If <condition>, read references/<file>.md`.
|
|
|
|
**`assets/`** — static resources: templates, schemas, lookup tables.
|
|
Reference by relative path from SKILL.md.
|
|
|
|
**`tests/`** — test files for scripts in `scripts/`. Use when scripts are complex
|
|
enough to break silently. Test infrastructure (`.bats`, `*_test.*`) belongs here,
|
|
not in `scripts/`. See `tests/README.md` for setup instructions.
|
|
|
|
If not needed, delete the placeholder READMEs and their directories.
|
|
|
|
### Step 5 — Validate
|
|
|
|
Run `/skill-audit` on `<destination-dir>/<skill-name>`.
|
|
|
|
All FAIL findings must be resolved before the skill is considered done.
|
|
|
|
## Improving an existing skill
|
|
|
|
### Step 1 — Verify inputs
|
|
|
|
Confirm the skill directory path exists and that at least one improvement signal is present in the conversation or a referenced file.
|
|
|
|
If the skill dir is missing, ask for it. If no signals are present, stop: "This skill applies existing signals to a skill. For a blind review without signals, use `/skill-audit` instead."
|
|
|
|
Signals can come from anywhere in the conversation or referenced files:
|
|
- Grill session output (most common predecessor in the factory sequence)
|
|
- `/skill-audit` findings (PASS/FAIL/SUGGESTION punch list)
|
|
- Human feedback (feedback.json, inline in conversation, PR or issue comments)
|
|
- Session context describing what went wrong
|
|
|
|
### Step 2 — Gather and group signals
|
|
|
|
Read the current skill files (SKILL.md and any files in scripts/, references/, assets/, tests/). Then collect all signals from the conversation and any file paths the user has referenced.
|
|
|
|
Group signals by **root cause**, not symptom. Ask: "What single gap in the skill causes this cluster of failures?" One root cause → one fix. Do not make a separate edit for each symptom.
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
Example:
|
|
- Session context: output format is wrong on every run
|
|
- Audit finding: no output template defined
|
|
- User feedback: "I always have to ask it to format the output"
|
|
→ Root cause: SKILL.md has no output format specification → one fix: add an output template
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 3 — Announce planned changes
|
|
|
|
Before editing, state:
|
|
- Which root causes were identified and what evidence supports each
|
|
- Which files will be changed and what will change in each
|
|
|
|
Then proceed — edits are reversible via git, no approval checkpoint needed.
|
|
|
|
### Step 4 — Apply changes
|
|
|
|
Edit any file in the skill directory that the signals point to: SKILL.md, scripts/, references/, assets/, tests/, README.md.
|
|
|
|
**Generalize, don't patch.** Find the underlying gap, not the specific example that failed. A fix scoped only to the test cases you've seen will overfit and perform worse on new inputs.
|
|
|
|
**Keep it lean.** Remove instructions that aren't pulling their weight. For every sentence you add, ask: "Would the agent get this wrong without it?" A shorter, focused skill consistently outperforms an exhaustive one.
|
|
|
|
**Explain the why.** Reasoning-based instructions outperform rigid directives. If you find yourself writing a rule in all caps (ALWAYS/NEVER), reframe it: explain why the behavior matters so the agent can apply judgment in edge cases.
|
|
|
|
If a signal points to a script or reference file, edit that file directly rather than adding a workaround in SKILL.md.
|
|
|
|
**On scripts**: Fix and edit existing scripts freely when signals point to them.
|
|
|
|
### Step 5 — Validate
|
|
|
|
Run `/skill-audit` on the skill directory. Resolve any FAIL findings before considering the improvement complete.
|